With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Ending DACA Would Have Disproportionate Effect On California, Home To More DREAM-ers Than Any Other State
More than 750,000 young immigrants have received work authorization and deportation relief through the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program since 2012, when it was implemented through an executive order by then-President Barack Obama. The future of the program and the fate of the DREAM-ers (as participants are known) has hung in the balance since November when President Trump was elected. Any changes to the DACA program would have an outsize effect on California; there are more DREAM-ers living in California than any other state in the nation.
Trump had pledged to "immediately" end the program while on the campaign trail, but he changed his tune slightly not long after taking office, saying that DREAM-ers "shouldn't be very worried" because he was "looking at it with great heart." In mid-June, the Department of Homeland Security issued new guidance about DACA that Politico characterized as the administration's "most explicit promise to date that so-called Dreamers can keep their permission to work legally in the U.S."
Despite those assurances, the precarious future of the program was back in national headlines on Wednesday, after Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly told members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus that the administration couldn't commit to defending the program from legal challenges, which could put it in serious jeopardy.
“This is what [Kelly is] being told by different attorneys, that if it goes to court it might not survive,” DHS spokesman David Lapan told the Washington Post after the meeting.
1/ Here is a summary of what happened on #immigration today.
— Juan Escalante (@JuanSaaa) July 12, 2017
Buckle down, because it a lot.
"I think we have to prepare for the worst and get ready to fight mass deportation," Rep. Luis V. Gutiérrez (D-IL) said in a statement issued Wednesday. Gutiérrez was among the members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus in Wednesday's meeting with Kelly. "We showed up at airports to fight the Muslim and Refugee Ban and now DREAMers and people who have lived here legally for decades with TPS [Temporary Protective Status] are in imminent danger," he continued.
"Ending this program would have an outsize effect on California, as more than a quarter of DACA grantees live in our state," California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said during a press call on Wednesday afternoon. "That’s more than 200,000 young people who are working and contributing to our economy, buying their first car or their first home, and making their community a better place to live," Becerra continued, pledging to "do everything in my power as Attorney General for the state of California to defend DACA and the young people who make countless contributions to our state and country."
California leads the nation in DACA recipients https://t.co/SqbSLae7tb pic.twitter.com/XxyI5oc60h
— Pew Research Race and Ethnicity (@pewidentity) July 6, 2017
According to the state attorney general, California would also lose more than a billion dollars in turnover costs (associated with losing trained and qualified workers and being forced to re-hire for those positions) if DACA is eliminated. California overwhelmingly leads the nation in DACA recipients, housing almost 100,000 more DREAM-ers than Texas, according to research published by the Pew Center in January. Texas is home to the nation's second largest concentration of DACA recipients.
Related: First DREAMer With Protected Status Deported Under Trump
These California Lawmakers Are Bringing DACA Recipients As Guests To Trump's Congressional Speech
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
-
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.