Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen

Share This

Criminal Justice

After 41 years in prison, man ensnared in OC snitch scandal is freed

Sprawling, beige government building with the words: Orange County Courthouse in letters across the top of the building.
The Orange County courthouse in Santa Ana.
(
Jill Replogle
/
LAist
)

Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.

A judge this week ordered the release of a man who has spent the last 41 years in prison in a case marked by prosecutorial misconduct, the latest fallout in the long-running Orange County “jailhouse snitch” scandal.

Guy Scott, who’s now 69 with gray hair and a wiry mustache, wiped away tears and pressed his hands together in gratitude as the judge announced that he would reduce the charges against Scott from murder to manslaughter. That means Scott, who was patched into the O.C. courtroom via teleconference from Corcoran state prison, has more than served his sentence and will be released in the coming days.

“This is a true second chance,” said Scott Sanders, the man’s lawyer.

Sanders is the former O.C. public defender who, a decade ago, first uncovered the county’s secret jailhouse informant program, now known as the “snitch scandal.” Since then, close to 60 convictions, including Scott’s, have been reduced or overturned, and the O.C. District Attorney’s Office and Sheriff’s Department have fought to recover their reputation and implement reforms.

Support for LAist comes from

After the hearing this week, Sanders commended Orange County prosecutors’ efforts to unearth and share the long-hidden evidence that led to Scott’s imminent release from prison.

“They ultimately did the right thing,” he told LAist.

How we got here

Larry Miner was killed in his apartment in 1981 while three men were staying with him. Two of the men, Scott and Peter McDonald, were convicted of the murder, while a third, Robert Neary, became an informant for prosecutors and was given immunity in exchange for his testimony.

New evidence suggests Neary lied to put increasing blame on Scott for Miner’s death, and to downplay his own role. But some of that evidence was initially hidden from Scott’s lawyers. Earlier this year, though, the evidence was discovered by an O.C. prosecutor and turned over to Scott’s new lawyer, Sanders.

If that evidence had initially been given to Scott’s lawyers, he “would have been acquitted 41 years ago,” Sanders wrote in a recent court filing.

Support for LAist comes from

Ultimately, both sides agreed to reduce the charges against Scott from first-degree murder to the much-less-serious voluntary manslaughter. That charge carries a sentence of up to 11 years in prison, meaning Scott has spent at least an extra three decades behind bars.

“It’s the most rewarding part of this job when justice finally gets delivered,” Sanders said, “but it’s also brutal that it took this long. He cannot get those years back.”

The start of the 'snitch scandal'

A man with short dark hair and small eyeglasses holds two fingers to his mouth, looking attentive. In the background, a partially bald man with black eyeglasses and an orange jail shirt looks down.
Assistant public defender Scott Sanders, at right, surfaced evidence of a secret, unconstitutional jailhouse informant program.
(
Mark Boster
/
Getty Images
)

In 2014, Sanders, who worked for the O.C. Public Defender’s Office at the time, was defending Scott Dekraai, the man accused of gunning down eight people at a Seal Beach salon several years earlier. And it was then that Sanders discovered evidence of a secret jailhouse informant program in Orange County.

Subsequently, a string of judges — and the U.S. Department of Justice — determined the informant program violated defendants’ constitutional right to due process in two ways:

  • One, by having informants or “snitches” question defendants behind bars without them knowing their words could be used against them in court, and without their lawyer present; and
  • Two, by not turning over evidence about those informants to defendants. 

The misconduct now known as "the snitch scandal" happened under Tony Rackauckas, the previous district attorney.

Support for LAist comes from

Even as evidence of the scandal mounted, Rackauckas repeatedly denied the existence of a secret informant program. He lost his re-election bid in 2018 to current District Attorney Todd Spitzer, who has implemented reforms and pledged not to tolerate cheating among prosecutors.

Coincidentally, Rackauckas was the prosecutor handling Scott’s case at the time and served as a witness in several phases of Scott’s trial. The discovery of misconduct in the use of informants in Scott’s case suggests the problem extends back “at least thirty years earlier” than the period investigated by the federal Department of Justice,” Sanders wrote in a recent court filing. “No single individual bears more responsibility for what has occurred — and what remains hidden — than Rackauckas,” Sanders wrote.

After this week’s resentencing hearing, Sanders told LAist that Scott’s decades-long wrongful imprisonment “may be the worst [of the snitch scandal] in terms of life sacrificed.”

Scott plans to move into a sober living home in Northern California as soon as he’s released.

“I cannot put enough words into how much I appreciate you,” Scott told Sanders and his colleagues at the hearing.

As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.

Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.

We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.

Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.

Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist