Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Lawyer Says Deputy Gang Witnesses Claim Unmarked Sheriff’s Cars Followed Them Home

Two Sheriff’s Department officials who testified publicly on deputy gangs last month were followed home afterwards by what appeared to be unmarked department cars, according to the attorney leading the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission’s investigation into the secretive groups.
Attorney Bert Deixler told the panel Friday that the incidents are the latest examples of the fear and intimidation surrounding the panel’s hearings on gangs, which have been going on since May.
Sheriff’s Sgt. Jefferson Chow, who testified last month about allegations that Sheriff Alex Villanueva blocked an investigation into the Banditos gang of deputies from the East L.A. station, saw the alleged undercover car following him and parking directly in front of his house, according to Deixler.
“If engaged in legitimate surveillance, I am informed by reliable police sources the car would have been parked unobtrusively,” he told the commission.
The same thing happened to Sheriff’s Capt. Angela Walton after her testimony, Deixler said. Walton took a picture of the car’s license plate and urged the commission to find out if it is a department car, he said.
“Captain Walton has asked me to publicly inform the commission of these facts and to assert that she will not be intimidated,” Deixler said.
The Sheriff's Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Two unnamed sergeants were scheduled to testify Friday, but both backed out, Deixler said, adding that they both feared retaliation.
One of the sergeants was scheduled to speak anonymously over an internet phone line about possible reforms at the department that would eliminate deputy gangs.
“Last night, the sergeant called me and emotionally said that he had spoken with his spouse and concluded that because a hoped-for promotion might be forthcoming, that even anonymously and with a voice distorter, the fear of retaliation was too great to take a risk and testify,” Deixler said.
Several other department personnel have also cancelled their appearances at the last minute, fearing damage to their careers or physical retaliation.
A retired LAPD division chief who was supposed to discuss possible reforms also backed out Friday, worried he would look “too political” testifying during the sheriff’s re-election campaign, Deixler said. Villanueva faces former Long Beach Police Chief Robert Luna in the November election.
Former LAPD Assistant Chief Sandy Jo MacArthur was the sole witness at Friday’s hearing. She discussed reforms implemented under that department’s consent decree that improved transparency and accountability.
Villanueva has said deputy gangs are not a problem at the department and condemned the hearings as political theater orchestrated by his enemies.
Search Of Supervisor's Home Criticized
Also Friday, the oversight commission voted unanimously to condemn Sheriff’s deputies’ searches of the home of one of its members and a county supervisor last week as part of a public corruption probe involving a Metro contract.
“LASD searched the homes of Commissioner Patti Giggans and Supervisor [Sheila] Kuehl in an attempt to besmirch their reputations and embarrass them in the press,” the resolution stated. “The latest stunt by the LASD and sheriff should be called out for what it is — a brazen abuse of power.”
Giggans and Kuehl are two of the sheriff’s sharpest critics.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta has taken over the investigation from the Sheriff’s Department amid concerns the sheriff is targeting enemies.
The resolution also called on Villanueva to disband his Public Corruption Unit, which some have called his “secret police.”
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.