Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Criminal Justice

LA Sheriff bans deputy gangs 3 years after law required policy. Watchdog inspector calls it 'bare minimum'

A man in a law enforcement uniform is standing behind a microphone with one hand raised.
Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna.
(
Brian Feinzimer
/
LAist
)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

The L.A. County Sheriff’s Department has announced a long-awaited — and legally required — policy banning deputy gangs — an issue that has challenged the department for decades.

Max Huntsman, L.A. County's inspector general, said the policy released Wednesday doesn't go far enough.

"We've gotten a policy that seems to be the bare minimum required by law that they could have put in place two-plus years [ago] now," Huntsman said.

He also said his office was kept out of developing the policy. The department denies that claim.

What's outlined in the policy?

The new policy is just over 800 words and says officers can be disciplined and fired for being in a law enforcement gang or hate group.

It also said the department will investigate alleged officer gangs within its ranks and cooperate with other authorized agencies conducting similar investigations.

Sponsored message

The policy was posted on internal section of the Sheriff’s Department website.

Why now

It comes three years after California legislators passed a law requiring law enforcement agencies to ban gang membership.

Why it matters

A report by a special counsel appointed by the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission last year called deputy gangs a “cancer” on the department and identified at least six deputy gangs or cliques within its ranks.

Two months after that report was issued, a judge issued an preliminary injunction blocking Huntsman from asking 35 deputies to reveal any gang tattoos they may have.

As LAist correspondent Frank Stoltze reported at the time:

Sponsored message
The deputies union argued it would have been an unreasonable search and would have violated California labor law... [Huntsman] argued a new state law that bans law enforcement gangs required the deputies to cooperate. In addition, Sheriff Robert Luna ordered the deputies to cooperate.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today