Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Criminal Justice

Commander Claims Sheriff Villanueva Covered Up Jail Video For Many Months

Three L.A. Sheriff's deputies knees over a man; one has his knee on the man's head. Six other deputies stand watching. Two other deputies are off to the side.
A screenshot from a jailhouse surveillance video obtained by LAist shows a deputy identified as Douglas Johnson kneeling on the head of a man identified as Enzo Escalante.

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

Update

Sheriff Villanueva announced Tuesday that he is investigating three people in connection with the leak of the video to the Los Angeles Times — including the reporter who first broke the story.

Sheriff Alex Villanueva attempted to cover up a video that showed a deputy with his knee on the head of a person in custody for about three minutes because he feared people would compare it to George Floyd’s murder, according to a legal claim filed Monday by a department commander.

The man in custody, Enzo Escalante, suffered minor injuries. Deputy Douglas Johnson was holding the handcuffed Escalante down with his knee after he had punched the deputy in the face.

In his whistleblower claim, Commander Allen Castellano asserts he immediately sent the video of the March 10, 2021 incident, which was obtained by LAist, up the chain of command to Assistant Sheriff Robin Limon.

The claim says Limon watched the video with Villanueva and Undersheriff Tim Murakami on or about March 15 —  many months before when the sheriff has previously said he viewed the incident. Castellano’s lawyer, Vincent Miller, said in an interview with LAist that Limon told Castellano she had watched the tape with the sheriff and undersheriff.

Sponsored message

The incident happened inside a lockup at the San Fernando Courthouse and left Escalante with minor injuries. Castellano claims the sheriff delayed an administrative investigation into the deputy’s actions for nearly a month and prevented the department’s Internal Criminal Investigations Bureau from reviewing the incident.

“Sheriff Villanueva blocked and stalled an investigation into an excessive Use of Force (“UOF”) incident to obstruct justice and avoid bad publicity for his re-election campaign,” the complaint claims. Villanueva faces eight challengers in the June primary.

The sheriff was not immediately available to comment when we reached out to his office.

He did address the case last month after the Los Angeles Times first reported that department officials had covered up the video. Villanueva held a news conference to say he hadn’t seen the video until November, some eight months after the incident. He said as soon as he watched it he ordered Johnson relieved from duty and called for a criminal probe.

Villanueva Cites A 'Potential Coverup' By Some Of His Senior Staff

The sheriff said the handling of the case had led him to launch an investigation into a "potential coverup" after he learned that "many people, including senior executives" in the department, failed to ensure there was a criminal investigation of the deputy, rather than just an administrative one.

As a result, Villanueva said he made "a change in our senior command." He then introduced Holly Francisco as acting assistant sheriff for countywide operations, a position that has been held by Limon.

Sponsored message

Villanueva also demoted Limon to captain, according to Miller.

Limon also was unavailable for immediate comment when contacted.

The claim says the sheriff’s aide, Lt. Anthony Blanchard, also watched the video on or about March 15 along with Villanueva, Limon, and Murakami at the sheriff’s headquarters inside the Hall of Justice. The complaint alleges the sheriff expressed “dismay” at the video and noted the failure of two supervisors to intervene.

“We do not need bad media at this time,” the claim asserts Villanueva said, adding that he allegedly told Limon he would “handle the matter.”

The complaint alleges Villanueva ordered that no criminal charges be filed against Escalante, who is seen on the video attacking Deputy Johnson, in an effort to prevent the recording from falling into the hands of Escalante's lawyer.

A legal claim is a precursor to a lawsuit.

Villanueva And Castellano Have A History

A criminal investigation was initiated in November only after a captain charged with reviewing use of force incidents looked at the video at the request of an internal affairs investigator, according to Miller.

Sponsored message

Johnson has been relieved of duty and the investigation is ongoing, according to Villanueva.

The complaint alleges the sheriff retaliated against Castellano the day after the investigation began by opening an internal affairs investigation into his handling of the initial administrative investigation into the video. The claim maintains Castellano followed all department procedures and that the sheriff ordered the inquiry “with malice and to cover for his own crimes and mistakes.”

Miller said Castellano received a written reprimand.

The complaint alleges Villanueva and Castellano have a history, that the sheriff “long harbored animosity and thirst for revenge” against Castellano. It describes a 2015 incident in which Villanueva, then a lieutenant, allegedly failed to get medical aid to a person in custody who had been tased by a deputy.

Castellano, then Villanueva’s captain, reported the alleged misconduct and Villanueva was given a five-day suspension. Villanueva retired in 2018 before the discipline was finalized, the claim states.

Castellano alleges the investigation into him was also payback for his reporting Villanueva’s alleged misconduct.

Corrected April 25, 2022 at 1:30 PM PDT

An earlier version of this story erroneously said the lawsuit alleged the sheriff watched the video on March 15. It claims he watched it "on or about" March 15.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right