Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
California Lawmakers Approve School Reopening Deal, But Will It Lead To Reopened Campuses?
An example of what an L.A. Unified School District classroom could look like if campuses reopen. (Chava Sanchez/LAist)
()
California lawmakers this morning easily approved a $6.6 billion package aimed at coaxing reluctant public schools to resume on-campus classes for the youngest and most at-risk students by April 1.
Gov. Gavin Newsom has promised a speedy final signature on Assembly Bill 86, which both State Senate and Assembly lawmakers approved by wide margins this morning.
“The goal of (AB 86) is to spur districts on the sidelines to act,” said Asm. Kevin McCarty, D-Sacramento, “and also help those that are already acting.”
Support for LAist comes from
The legislation includes $2 billion in incentives which public schools can only claim if they promise to bring all students in kindergarten through second grade back to campuses by April 1. In order to claim the incentive funds, districts must also agree to take steps to partially reopen middle- and high schools as soon as their county exits the “purple tier,” the highest and most restrictive tier on California’s COVID-19 monitoring system.
Districts could use the incentive money to pay for physical safety measures. The bill also includes $4.6 billion in aid schools can use to combat learning loss through tutoring programs, a longer school year and direct support for students at risk of missing graduation.
‘WITH OR WITHOUT THIS BILL…’
But in school districts like Los Angeles Unified, it’s not clear the bill’s passage will spur change.
LAUSD’s teachers' union has said it wants all staff members vaccinated before campuses reopen. They’re still negotiating with the district on a series of on-campus safety protocols. United Teachers Los Angeles leaders have panned AB 86 as, effectively, a subsidy to rich communities where schools are already prepared to open.
Other critics, like Sen. Scott Wilk, R-Santa Clarita, voted for the bill, but said it represented a punt from Gov. Gavin Newsom; Wilk felt the governor could have done more to compel reluctant districts to reopen.
“I believe with or without this bill, school districts that want to reopen will, and school districts that don’t want to reopen, won’t,” Wilk said on the floor of the state Senate. “So if this is not a school reopening bill, what is it? I believe it’s a CYA maneuver by Gov. Newsom to get parents to believe he’s doing everything he can for them.”
Support for LAist comes from
Assemblymember Lorena Gonzalez, D-San Diego, also said she was voting to support the bill despite concerns about its flaws. She also urged lawmakers to pass follow-up legislation to address the needs of students who were completely checked out during the last year.
“I know people are really anxious to get their kids back to school in every community,” Gonzalez said, “but there’s justifiable fear” of the virus, she added, especially in low-income communities.
READ MORE:
- LA Teachers Union Says Newsom’s Campus Reopening Deal Is Unfair To Hard-Hit Districts
- Beutner: Governor Promises LAUSD 25,000 Vaccines -- Enough For All Elementary Employees
- Who Has The Power To Reopen California Classrooms?
Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletters. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity. -
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
-
The weather’s been a little different lately, with humidity, isolated rain and wind gusts throughout much of Southern California. What’s causing the late-summer bout of gray?
-
Hexavalent chromium is the same carcinogen Erin Brockovich warned about in the 1990s, but researchers say more study is needed on the potential health effects of nanoparticles detected earlier this year. Experts will answer questions at a webinar this evening.
Best of LAist