With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Technically, California won’t delay an oil well protection law — but Newsom axes funding to enforce it
Gavin Newsom’s late session proposal to extend deadlines — by more than four years in one case — for oil companies to comply with a new law fizzled and died late this week.
But environmental groups didn’t have a chance to cheer a rare victory over California’s fossil fuel interests: When the governor’s administration withdrew the proposal, it also eliminated from the budget bill any funding to implement the 2022 law — a law that prohibits new oil operations within 3,200 feet of homes and schools and calls for a robust monitoring system to track leaks and air and water quality.
State agencies maintained that the deadlines for implementing many of the law’s requirements were never practical and did not allow sufficient time to hire staff to oversee a new state program, or to understand and put in place the complex monitoring and testing regimes to ensure public health.
While some of the law’s elements are already in place — no new oil or gas wells are now permitted within the buffer zone, for example — leak detection protocols and other critical monitoring elements have yet to be determined.
Environmental groups say there’s an inherent contradiction to the governor’s actions. Officials needed more time to prepare and put in place a suite of sophisticated regulations that were new to them. But, by holding back the funding that would have allowed regulators to hire staff and build expertise, it makes it more difficult for agencies to carry out the law, ensuring more delays.
The original law’s author, Lena A. Gonzalez, a Democrat from Long Beach, has expressed frustration at the delay and the toll it will take on communities affected by California oil wells, noting that if state agencies are understaffed, there’s been “plenty of time to figure this out.”
At the end of this week, she struck a cautiously optimistic tone. “As negotiations continue, I remain hopeful that we can reach an agreement that won’t delay the critical protections our communities have fought so hard to achieve,” she said in a statement. “This is a pivotal opportunity to protect our progress — there’s no time to move backward.”
Some 2.5 million Californians, mostly those in low-income communities of color, live within 3,200 feet of an oil or gas well. And those wells are risky neighbors: Research has linked their proximity to a higher incidence of premature and low birthweight babies.
-
The weather’s been a little different lately, with humidity, isolated rain and wind gusts throughout much of Southern California. What’s causing the late-summer bout of gray?
-
Hexavalent chromium is the same carcinogen Erin Brockovich warned about in the 1990s, but researchers say more study is needed on the potential health effects of nanoparticles detected earlier this year. Experts will answer questions at a webinar this evening.
-
The budget gap has led to a tuition hike, along with spending cuts and fewer course offerings. At the same time, generative AI already has transformed higher ed — including post-grad job prospects.
-
The construction work is part of a $143.7 million plan to rehabilitate pavement between Van Nuys and Westwood along the Sepulveda Pass.
-
Over $17 million has already been raised to support and oppose Prop. 50, California’s congressional redistricting measure. We fill you in on how to track the money ahead of the special election on Nov. 4.
-
A City Council committee voted 3-1 to advance a proposal that — if passed by the full council — would explore ending parking requirements citywide.