Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
City Council Could Hit The Brakes On Uber And Lyft Pick-Ups At LAX
Arrivals at LAX (Photo by ckramer via the Creative Commons on Flickr)
()
Looks like Uber and Lyft might not be allowed to pick you up at LAX after all, if some L.A. City Council members have their way.
Six council members are now saying they want to halt plans to allow ride-share services like Uber and Lyft from legally picking people up from the airport. Led by Councilman Paul Krekorian, they argue in a proposed motion that they want to further examine concerns about passenger safety, disability access, vehicle emissions and more, according to City News Service. The council vote comes fast on the heels of LAX and Mayor Eric Garcetti giving the thumbs up to the companies to apply for permits to do pick-ups.
Just a couple weeks ago, LAX's Board of Airport Commissioners voted unanimously to allow the ride-sharing companies to make pick-ups as early as August, pending approval by airport officials and the city attorney. Before that, Garcetti had proposed the change in his State of the City address back in April, and has been pushing for it since. But apparently the City Council is not about to give the plan five stars, at least not without some significant changes.
Councilmembers Krekorian and Paul Koretz, who seconded the motion, previously sent a letter to the Airport Commission, stating their concerns with the plan. The May 13 letter explains, "Given the security and safety concerns unique to the airport and the surrounding area, it is our view that [ride-sharing services] currently lack the necessary regulatory framework to do business at LAX." They argue that they would not approve of a plan that doesn't demand the same level of regulations that are imposed on taxi companies. They worry that things like background checks, environmental requirements and insurance coverage will not be enough with the ride-sharing companies.
Support for LAist comes from
The Airport Commission-approved agreement would require Uber, Lyft and other ride-sharing companies to obtain an active permit from the California Public Utilities Commission, maintain sufficient insurance coverage, pay a $4-per-trip fee and a monthly licensing fee, and meet other requirements as well.
The council is expected to vote on the motion next week, and if approved, the would then be reviewed by the 15 member council.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist