Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Caltech and USC Sue Federal Government Over New Visa Restrictions
A statue of the school mascot, the Trojan, stands on the campus of the University of Southern California. (David McNew/Getty Images)
()
Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletters. To support our nonprofit public service journalism: Donate now.
Caltech and the University of Southern California are among plaintiffs suing the federal government for putting new restrictions on H1-B visas for highly skilled foreign workers.
The policy changes released by the Departments of Labor and Homeland Security earlier this month would make it harder for U.S. employers to hire foreign workers for jobs in specialized fields, like engineering, technology or healthcare.
Support for LAist comes from
The new rules propose a narrowed definition of "specialty work." Applicants will be expected to match a specific bachelor's degree to the position they're applying for. A general degree in engineering, for example, will no longer suffice -- applicants will need a sub-specific degree, like in software or mechanical engineering.
The government is also raising minimum salaries for high-skilled international workers to rates some employers say they can't afford.
According to an interim final rule posted in the the Federal Register, the restrictions on the H-1B visa are intended to protect U.S. workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
"...this rule will improve program integrity and better ensure that only petitioners who meet the statutory criteria for the H-1B classification are able to employ H-1B workers who are qualified for the classification. This, in turn, will protect jobs of U.S. workers as a part of responding to the national emergency, and facilitate the Nation's economic recovery," the rule reads.
Local universities, along with several business groups and other plaintiffs, are pushing back against these changes. In their complaint filed in the Federal District Court for Northern California, the plaintiffs argue the government's expectations would cause harm by forcing employers to terminate qualified workers.
The plaintiffs estimate that higher minimum salaries would cost $198.29 billion in extra costs on employers over ten years.
Miriam Feldblum is Executive Director of the Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a coalition of university leaders and a plaintiff in the suit. She said the restrictions are particularly a threat to local research institutions.
Support for LAist comes from
"Science cannot be done without also attracting the best global talent in the world -- something Caltech does so well," Feldblum said.
Feldblum believes the restrictions could discourage international students from applying to local universities, and she doesn't buy the rationale that H1-B visa holders are preventing U.S. workers from finding jobs during the pandemic.
"This is the time to open up our doors to talent and contributors," Feldblum said. "We need to jump start our economy, not dampen our economy."
The plaintiffs are asking a federal district judge to block the federal government's new policies. Meanwhile, the public comment period for the rule aimed at restricting H-1B visas is set to end Nov. 9.
WE LOVE TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist