Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
Child Care Providers Will Get More Financial Help From The State

Members of California's child care union who have continued to operate during the pandemic will get additional financial relief from the state under a new labor agreement.
The tentative pact, which still requires legislative approval, includes:
- A one-time $525 stipend for each child enrolled in a subsidized child care program. This program is typically available to low-income families but during the pandemic it has been extended to essential workers.
- 16 additional paid closure days in the event that a provider has to temporarily shut down because of COVID-19.
- Establishing a working group to discuss how California should spend an estimated $700 million in federal money for child care included in the most recent coronavirus relief act – $300 million was already designated through last year’s budget.
- A grievance process to settle any disputes related to the agreement.
The stipends will be funded through the federal Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Act and cost an estimated $144 million. The $31.25 million for the additional closure days will be pulled from leftover money allocated for the same purpose last year.
California's legislature has to approve the stipends and paid closure days before the 43,000 providers represented by the union will see any of the money.
"We cannot stop putting the pressure on the state of California," said union chair Max Arias. "This is just the first step."
The average pay L.A. County family child care providers, who are largely women of color, is $11.73 an hour.
Almost half of California family child care providers haven't been able to pay themselves at some point during the pandemic and 22% missed a rent or mortgage payment, according to a survey from the Center for the Study of Child Care Employment at UC Berkeley.
As of January 25, 2,599 licensed child care homes had closed permanently since the start of the pandemic, according to the California Department of Social Services.
While there have been relatively few reported coronavirus cases in child care settings, home-based child care providers also carry the burden of potentially exposing their families to the virus.
Signal Hill family child care provider Zoila Carolina Toma has had to shut down three times during the pandemic, once when she and her family were sick with COVID-19 and twice for possible exposures.
Toma plans to use the money and the stipend to continue paying her assistant but says for other providers, it won't be enough to pay off the debt they've built up over the last year.
"It was not an easy decision because unfortunately some providers are going to be out, no doubt," said Toma, who's a member of the union's bargaining committee.
The details of the agreement will exclude some providers who've cared for families in the subsidy program during the pandemic. For example, the stipends will be calculated based on a providers' enrollment as of November 2020.
Toma knows from running her own business that enrollment has fluctuated from day to day during the pandemic. Her license allows her to care for up to 14 children but on Tuesday just six showed up.
LAist has reached out to the state's Department of Human Resources for comment.
READ MORE ABOUT EARLY CHILDHOOD:
- What LA Child Care Providers Need to Know About Getting the COVID-19 Vaccine
- Thousands Of California Child Care Providers Have Closed. A New Child Care Union Aims To Save The Rest
- For California Child Care Workers, Inequality Is Baked Into The System
Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletter. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
-
The weather’s been a little different lately, with humidity, isolated rain and wind gusts throughout much of Southern California. What’s causing the late-summer bout of gray?
-
Hexavalent chromium is the same carcinogen Erin Brockovich warned about in the 1990s, but researchers say more study is needed on the potential health effects of nanoparticles detected earlier this year. Experts will answer questions at a webinar this evening.