One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Big Tobacco Says Scary New Cigarette Labels Will Kill Off Their Customer Base, Files Suit Against Uncle Sam
One of the nine new labels (FDA)
The graphic new images poised to adorn American cigarette packs next year are meant to warn smokers and would-be smokers of the health dangers associated with the habit. However a few large U.S. tobacco companies say the new labels will just plain scare their customers away from cigarettes, and they've filed a suit against the federal government.
R.J. Reynolds, Lorillard, Commonwealth, Liggett, and Santa Fe Natural Tobacco, are suing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), claiming that the nine new warning labels violate their First Amendment rights, because it's forcing companies who make a legal product to tell their customers not to buy the product, explains Health News.
The companies think the FDA has "overstepped their bounds from warning territory to an advocacy position to kill tobacco use," which jeopardizes the livelihood of tobacco farmers and cigarette makers.
The labels include images on the more macabre side, like a stitched up corpse, rotting teeth, and smoke-damaged lungs. There's the distressed baby, the guy with the hole in the throat, and a woman emotionally overwrought because we're meant to think she either has lung cancer as a result of inhaling second hand smoke or knows someone who that happened to.
"The lawsuit said the images were manipulated to be especially emotional," notes ABC7.
The FDA has not commented on the suit.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
