Support for LAist comes from
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Stay Connected
Audience-funded nonprofit news
Listen

Share This

News

AT&T’s Plan To ‘Phase Out’ Landline Service In California Likely To Be Denied

A close up of a grey phone handle resting on a phone with a small screen
State regulators are likely to prevent AT&T from dropping landline service.
(
Dan Dennis on Unsplash
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive. 

After months of public backlash, California regulators are expected to reject AT&T’s bid to phase out landline service at a meeting on Thursday this week — but the company is still exploring other legal remedies.

AT&T is trying to withdraw as a carrier of last resort (COLR) which requires the company to offer basic phone service to anyone who wants it. It’s held that designation since 1996, and remains one of the only companies in the state to offer traditional copper-based landline service.

Public comments

Thousands of Californians submitted public comments and called into public meetings over the last year to urge the commission to reject AT&T’s application due to public safety. They say the move could hurt older adults, people with disabilities and other groups impacted by the digital divide.

Support for LAist comes from

Public commenters also highlighted the unreliability of cell phone networks or VoIP (voice over internet protocol), which allows users to make calls over an internet connection.

In the case of an emergency, copper landlines are considered more dependable because they work during power outages — especially for people who live in rural or coastal communities.

“We're now in fire season and people had better have a way to receive emergency alerts and communicate with each other when the power goes out,” said Regina Costa of the advocacy group TURN. It helped organize residents around the landline issue.

Proposed denial

Last month, the California Public Utilities Commission issued a proposed denial of AT&T’s request, citing public feedback and the fact that no other telecommunications company stepped up to replace AT&T in that role (Other companies could still offer landline service if they wanted to, but would not be legally required to do so).

“Specifically, AT&T failed to demonstrate the availability of replacement providers willing and able to serve as COLR, nor did AT&T prove that alternative providers met the COLR definition,” the CPUC said in a statement.

Support for LAist comes from

The proposal will now be fully voted on by the commission during its June 20 meeting.

“AT&T did not prove its case at the commission … they didn't present any evidence to show that customers would have any real alternatives, and in fact, they admitted that they don't,” Costa said.

Outlier

California may be something of an outlier in this issue. Twenty states have already given the telecom giant permission to drop landlines. In Illinois, the company agreed to pay $23 million in fines for allegedly bribing lawmakers to end mandated landline service.

“In California, we tend to look at things a little more closely, so hopefully [lawmakers] will see through this,” Costa said.

About 5% of AT&T’s customers, or 500,000 people, have traditional copper-based phone service. A spokesperson said it plans to phase out its copper-based network over the next few years because it’s an “older, antiquated technology,” and that people are leaving the network everyday in favor of advanced services like fiber.

“We remain committed to keeping our customers connected to voice service and will continue working with state leaders on policies that allow us to bring modern communications to Californians,” the company said in a statement.

Support for LAist comes from

AT&T says state regulators dismissed its application before it had the chance to create a plan that would ensure that no customer would be left behind.

It recently partnered with Assemblymember Tina McKinnor of Inglewood on a new bill that would “modernize” the state’s communications infrastructure and essentially remove any carrier of last resort obligations. It’s expected to be heard in the Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee in early July.

Meanwhile the CPUC says it will also consider updating the rules for carrier of last resort service obligations in its meeting this week.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist