Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Three ways it's getting worse

    Topline:

    One year after UnitedHealthcare's CEO was shot and killed, the crisis in U.S. health care has gotten even worse — in ways both obvious and hidden.


    Insurance costs are rising: The costs of both Obamacare and employer-sponsored insurance plans are set to skyrocket next year, in a country where health care is already the most expensive in the developed world. The end result is that nearly half of U.S. adults expect they won't be able to afford necessary health care next year, according to a Gallup poll published last month.

    Insurers are also struggling financially: Some of those increased costs are also hitting insurers — even the ones that also control other parts of the health care ecosystem. UnitedHealth Group is far more than just the owner of the largest U.S. health insurance company. It's one of the largest companies in the world, and it's involved in almost every part of how Americans access health care — from employing or overseeing 10% of the doctors they see to processing about 20% of the prescriptions they fill. Shares in UnitedHealth Group have plunged 44% from a year earlier.

    Read on . . . to see how healthcare costs are affecting Wall St.

    One year after UnitedHealthcare's CEO was shot and killed, the crisis in U.S. health care has gotten even worse — in ways both obvious and hidden.

    People increasingly can't afford health insurance. The costs of both Obamacare and employer-sponsored insurance plans are set to skyrocket next year, in a country where health care is already the most expensive in the developed world.

    Yet even as costs surge, the companies and the investors who profit from this business are also struggling financially. Shares in UnitedHealth Group, the giant conglomerate that owns UnitedHealthcare and that plays a key role in the larger stock market, have plunged 44% from a year earlier. (It was even worse before a rally in UnitedHealth shares on Wednesday.)

    "UnitedHealth's reputation in the investment community, before December 4 last year, was [as] a safe place to put your money. And that basically got all blown up," says Julie Utterback, a senior equity analyst who covers health care companies for Morningstar.

    Then, on Dec. 4, 2024, UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was shot on a Manhattan street on his way to an investor event. The shocking act of violence sparked a widespread consumer outcry over U.S. health care costs and denied claims, and plunged UnitedHealth Group into a public relations disaster.

    But that was only the start of the business woes for the company and its entire industry — which are facing regulatory scrutiny, tightening margins, and investor skepticism. Many of UnitedHealth's top competitors have also seen their shares suffer in the past year, at a time when the stock market in general has been hitting tech-driven record highs. The S&P 500's healthcare index has lagged the larger market. And some Wall Street analysts are bracing for another rocky year in the business of health care.

    "Near term, there's a lot more volatility to come," says Michael Ha, a senior equity research analyst who covers health care companies for investment bank Baird.

    Dec. 4 started to reveal the depth of U.S. health care problems

    This wide-ranging crisis for both consumers and businesses underlines the brokenness of the U.S. health care system: When neither the people it's supposed to serve nor the people making money from it are happy, does it work at all?

    "We're really at an inflection point," says Katherine Hempstead, a senior policy officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the author of a book about the insurance industry.

    "Every segment of the health insurance business right now is stressed," she adds.

    These stresses became brutally visible a year ago — and persist today. Luigi Mangione, the 27-year-old suspect in Thompson's killing, was in court this week for hearings ahead of his trial.

    But the crisis in U.S. health care is much bigger than his case. Here are three main ways it's playing out this year, from Main Street to Wall Street.

    Prices are going up — and people are getting ready to go without medical care

    No matter how you get your health insurance, it will likely cost more next year.

    For the roughly 24 million people who get their insurance through the government's health care exchanges, Affordable Care Act subsidies are set to expire at the end of the year — sending premiums soaring. Another 154 million people are insured through their employers — and premiums for those plans are also set to skyrocket.

    Costs are increasing for several reasons: Drug companies have developed more effective cancer treatments and weight-loss drugs, which they can charge more for. More people are going back to the doctor after the pandemic kept them away, which is creating more demand and allowing providers and hospitals to increase prices. And some hospitals, doctors' offices, insurance companies and other businesses within the health care system have merged or consolidated, often allowing the remaining businesses to raise prices for their services.

    The end result is that nearly half of U.S. adults expect they won't be able to afford necessary health care next year, according to a Gallup poll published last month.

    Jennifer Blazis and her family are among them.

    "It just always blows me away, how much I have to consider cost when something happens with the kids," the 44-year-old nonprofit worker and mother of four told NPR this fall in an interview for its Cost of Living series.

    Blazis and her family live in Colorado Springs and get their insurance through her husband's small property-management business. She says she's postponing leg surgery that would address a condition that's causing her pain, but which her doctors say is not yet urgent.

    "We wait to go to the doctor because we know if we do, we're going to get hit with just a massive bill," Blazis says. "And this is with … a really good health insurance plan that our [family] company pays a ton of money for."

    Yet even the biggest businesses selling these services are struggling

    Some of those increased costs are also hitting insurers — even the ones that also control other parts of the health care ecosystem.

    UnitedHealth Group is far more than just the owner of the largest U.S. health insurance company. It's one of the largest companies in the world, and it's involved in almost every part of how Americans access health care — from employing or overseeing 10% of the doctors they see to processing about 20% of the prescriptions they fill.

    It's also one of the most influential stocks on Wall Street. UnitedHealth Group is one of 30 companies that makes up the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average — so what happens with its shares helps determine what happens with the overall stock market.

    The company has had a miserable year on both fronts. The reasons come down to profits, more than PR: UnitedHealth and its competitors have been facing rising costs in the Medicare Advantage businesses that allow private insurers to collect government payments for managing the care of seniors.

    These programs were once widely seen as moneymakers for big health insurers, but now they've gotten UnitedHealth embroiled in financial and regulatory trouble, including a Department of Justice investigation into its Medicare business. The company abruptly replaced its CEO in May, a few months before it acknowledged that it was facing the government probe.

    Now UnitedHealth is trying to get rid of about 1 million Medicare Advantage patients — and otherwise move on from the past year's many problems.

    "We want to show that we can get back to the swagger the company once had," Wayne DeVeydt, UnitedHealth's chief financial officer, told investors last month.

    One prominent investor is betting it can: In August, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway disclosed that it had bought more than 5 million shares in UnitedHealth Group. The news helped lift the stock from its depths — but it still has a long way to go for both its share price and its profits to recover from this year's slump.

    Chief Executive Stephen Hemsley acknowledged as much in October, promising investors "higher and sustainable, double-digit growth beginning in 2027 and advancing from there."

    Spokespeople for UnitedHealth declined to comment for this story.

    Wall Street used to think health care was safe. It's waiting for a turnaround

    Health care spending accounts for about a fifth of the U.S. economy, making the for-profit companies that earn this money some of the most powerful in the world.

    That's helped their appeal to investors, who traditionally tend to consider health care stocks "defensive," or safe, investments. That appeal sometimes overrides the industry's current financial challenges: In the past month, as Wall Street had its now-quarterly panic over the artificial intelligence bubble, health care stocks actually outperformed the broader market for a few weeks.

    Still, health care is massively lagging the market in the long term.

    Morningstar's Utterback is optimistic that the industry can eventually turn around its deeper financial, regulatory and reputational problems. She even calls most health care stocks "undervalued" currently — but she warns that investors will have to have a lot of patience if they want to see bets on the sector pay off.

    "My explicit forecast period is 10 years. It's not three," she says. "There's a murky outlook here for the next couple years, at least."

    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Patients under 19 guaranteed care through January
    About a dozen people stand on a street corner holding LGBTQ and trans pride flags.
    Protesters gathered outside the Orange County children's hospital in January.

    Topline:

    Children’s Hospital of Orange County’s parent company, Rady Children’s Health, will keep offering gender-affirming care to people under 19 for at least six more months as part of a temporary restraining order in an ongoing court case.

    What’s in the order? In addition to the extension, the court action guarantees gender-affirming care at Rady Children’s Health hospitals includes puberty-blocking implants.

    Does this case have implications for other hospitals? No. California Attorney General Rob Bonta brought the suit due to the terms of a merger agreement between Children’s Hospital of Orange County and Rady Children’s Hospital in San Diego. The case does not apply to other clinics or hospitals.

    How to find care: Despite the legal battles and federal threats, advocates stress that gender-affirming care for people under 18 is legal and they expect it to remain so in California. However, it may require going through an agency that can act as an intermediary, especially as providers take their information off the public internet.

    Other efforts: The state Legislature has approved $26 million in funding for gender-affirming healthcare in the next state budget. That is awaiting approval by Gov. Gavin Newsom.

    Read on … for reaction from advocates and more details about the case

    More than 1,000 families in Southern California learned this week that they will be able to access healthcare for transgender youth under 19 for at least another six months. That’s according to an extended temporary restraining order in a court case between the state of California and Rady Children’s Health, which operates the largest hospital networks for kids in the region.

    The agreement is the longest guarantee of medical care these families have had since January for the network that includes Children’s Hospital of Orange County and Rady Children’s Hospital in San Diego.

    While patient advocates told LAist the news is welcome, they also said it’s been a confusing time for families.

    What’s in the agreement?

    The California Attorney General’s Office, which sued Rady Children’s Health in January after the hospital announced it would stop gender-affirming care for people under 19, confirmed that the care at Rady hospitals will continue until the court issues a ruling on a permanent injunction. That hearing is slated for January 2027.

    The temporary restraining order also now explicitly protects doctors’ ability to prescribe puberty-blocking implants when deemed medically appropriate. The Attorney General’s Office said that this provision was put in at their request.

    The judge overseeing the case has issued or extended temporary restraining orders requiring Rady hospitals to continue offering gender-affirming healthcare to people under 19 multiple times since February.

    The state of California also said in a June 22 court filing that there was no evidence that Rady Children’s Health has been served with a subpoena for patients’ health records, which advocates say the federal government has used as a tactic to intimidate hospitals into stopping gender-affirming care for people under 19.

    How advocates are responding

    Advocates for trans youth healthcare access say that the news is a welcome reprieve for families.

    “We're very happy that the [Attorney General’s Office] is pushing this as hard as they are, and the judge just keeps extending this [temporary restraining order] time and time again,” said Kathie Moehlig, director of the nonprofit TransFamily Support Services.

    But Moehlig, who works directly with families to connect them to gender-affirming care providers, said the situation is also proving “very confusing” for families, who say the hospital hasn’t been properly communicating important updates to them.

    Patient families also launched their own lawsuit against Rady Children’s Health in March seeking to restore the care at the hospital system, alleging that the hospital’s plans to end care at its hospital violated state anti-discrimination law.

    “This is an incredibly important time in this country where the federal government has targeted this medical care, not based on science or medicine, but based on politics,” said attorney Amy Whelan of the National Center for LGBTQ Rights, part of the legal team representing Rady patient families.

    Rady Children’s Health did not respond to a request for comment before publication.

    What this means for families with trans kids

    Advocates have stressed that gender-affirming care for youth is legal, and families should continue to seek it if needed for their children. California has passed shield laws protecting the care within state boundaries.

    “Patients are protected, and Rady Children's Health is continuing this care, and they will do that for at least the next six months,” said Whelan.

    Moehlig of TransFamily Support Services said that she hopes Rady Children’s Health will be more communicative with patient families in the months ahead.

    “If you're not following what's happening, if you haven't seen today or yesterday's news, you might not know that they're still open,” she said.

    The state’s lawsuit against Rady Children’s Health will not have implications for other hospitals in the state. California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s lawsuit specifically cited a merger agreement his office approved in 2024 in which Rady Children’s Health hospitals agreed to maintain their current level of gender-affirming care.

    How to get connected with resources for trans youth

    For families looking for care, Moehlig stressed that the care is still legal and protected for youth in the state of California, and TransFamily Support Services is one of many organizations that can help connect parents with doctors and other resources.

    “I think it's important for families to work with agencies that are really committed to getting them the best care rather than necessarily trying to find it through a Google search,” Moehlig said.

    You can find more information on how to get connected with TransFamily Support Services’ resources on their website.

    The organization Gender Wellness of Los Angeles has a list of resources for transgender peopple in Southern California, including some specifically for families.

    The L.A. LGBT Center also has a list of organizations for people looking to support their trans loved ones.

    What's next

    The extension of gender-affirming care at CHOC and Rady’s other hospitals comes as advocates are seeking to beef up protections for trans healthcare, especially as the federal government issues a fresh round of subpoenas to hospitals around the country, some of which have already been blocked.

    Advocates are also watching to see if Gov. Gavin Newsom will approve increased funding aimed at protecting gender-affirming care and reproductive healthcare. Tens of millions of dollars were proposed for the California budget but didn’t make it into Newsom’s version. The governor has until Tuesday to decide whether to include the funding.

  • Sponsored message
  • Millions of pounds of food remain inside warehouse
    Boxes of rotting food
    The smell of rotten meat and fish permeated throughout the home of Alfonso Hernandez, 67, who lives just a few houses north of where the Lineage warehouse fire in Boyle Heights took place.

    Topline:

    Now that the Boyle Heights warehouse fire has been knocked down, officials are shifting to the next phase: cleaning up the millions of pounds of seafood, pork, beef, and poultry left inside what remains of the damaged warehouse.

    Cleanup effort: Lineage said it hired Signal Restoration Services to lead cleanup efforts and has already staged cleanup equipment on-site. Plans for disinfection, odor control, and pest control will be implemented. Lineage is also exploring ways to minimize disruption to the community, including the use of watertight trailers and containers to transport waste off-site. Firefighters will remain on site to keep the building cool and address any remaining hot spots deep within the harder to reach regions of the structure. They will also support safety measures for cleanup crews. 

    Resources continue to be available: Officials are working with AltaMed, specifically the sites nearest to the scene, and St. John’s Community Health Clinic, to open mobile clinics throughout the district in the days ahead. The smoke respite shelter at City Terrace Park will close at noon on Saturday, June 27, as use has significantly declined, Solis shared in a statement. 

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    The smell of rotten meat and fish permeated throughout the home of Alfonso Hernandez, 67, who lives just a few houses north of where the Lineage warehouse fire in Boyle Heights took place. Despite running an air purifier, the stench mixed with Thursday’s heat reminded him of the notorious smell of driving by the Farmer John meatpacking plant in the city of Vernon, less than 3 miles away. 

    To him, this was worse.

    “It’s like sometimes when I forget food in my car and then two days later I’m like, ‘What the heck?’,” Hernandez said.

    Even though the warehouse fire has been declared knocked down, nearby residents are still dealing with its aftermath. Now, officials are shifting into the next phase: Cleaning up the millions of pounds of seafood, pork, beef, and poultry left inside what remains of the damaged warehouse.

    “Once we turn this building over to the building owner and the business owner, they will be responsible for paying all the expenses with the haul away,” Los Angeles Fire Department Chief Jaime Moore told reporters at Thursday’s press conference. 

    Regulatory agencies like the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are expected to play a role in overseeing product disposal, Moore explained. 

    Firefighters will remain on site to keep the building cool and address any remaining hot spots deep within the harder to reach regions of the structure. They will also support safety measures for cleanup crews. 

    In a statement, Lineage said it hired Signal Restoration Services to lead cleanup efforts and has already staged cleanup equipment on-site.

    Plans for disinfection, odor control, and pest control will be implemented. Lineage is also exploring ways to minimize disruption to the community, including the use of watertight trailers and containers to transport waste off-site.

    “To move forward as quickly as possible, we urge the government agencies involved to promptly address any permitting or other approvals necessary to begin cleanup,” the company said.

    A 2024 fire in Finley, Washington, offers a glimpse into what residents might expect moving forward. The cold-storage warehouse, also operated by Lineage Logistics, burned for two months. Cleanup cost about $10 million. The entire building was lost and county commissioners at the time grew frustrated with how long the process took. In some cases, clearing took time because certain areas required approval from fire investigators or local agencies

    “Knocking down the fire does not mean the crisis is behind us. It means we’re entering a new phase,” said Councilmember Ysabel Jurado. “Now, our focus must be on protecting people’s health, supporting recovery and making sure this community gets the answers it deserves.” 

    Officials are working with AltaMed, specifically the sites nearest to the scene, and St. John’s Community Health Clinic, to open mobile clinics throughout the district in the days ahead. 

    Jurado and LA County Supervisor Hilda Solis authored separate motions on June 23 seeking answers about the cause of the fire, the facility’s compliance history, inspections, and oversight systems. Accountability, Jurado said, begins with facts. 

    The smoke respite shelter at City Terrace Park will close at noon on Saturday, June 27, as use has significantly declined, Solis shared in a statement. 

    “The County’s Department of Health Services mobile unit was deployed multiple times this week at City Terrace Park, alongside Via Care and other FQHC partners, and will continue to support distribution efforts and deployments as needed, providing basic care, respiratory checks, screenings, and referrals at no cost.” 

    How to report odors: 

    Contact the South Coast Air Quality Management District by calling (800) CUT SMOG or (800) 288-7664.

    Boyle Heights Beat senior reporter Alejandra Molina contributed to this story.

  • What you need to know for this Sunday
    A crowd of people walk and visit stands under tents on a street closed off to vehicles.
    Leimert Park Village during Martin Luther King Day on Monday, Jan. 19, 2026, in Los Angeles, CA.

    Topline:

    Hit the brakes on whatever you’re doing because CicLAvia is coming to South L.A. on Sunday and there’s a lot to know about the 66th L.A. Open Streets event hosted by L.A. Metro.

    Why it matters: Around 3.6 miles between Leimert Park and Expo Park will become a car-free zone for people to walk, jog, bike and skate, according to CicLAvia’s website. The route will also include restricted parking and limited vehicle access.

    Meet LAist at CicLAvia: LAist staff will be at the Leimert Park hub in Leimert Park from 9 a.m. to 4.m. with special LAist swag. More information can be found here.

    Read on... for tips on what to know ahead of the event.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    Hit the brakes on whatever you’re doing because CicLAvia is coming to South L.A. on Sunday and there’s a lot to know about the 66th L.A. Open Streets event hosted by L.A. Metro.

    Around 3.6 miles between Leimert Park and Expo Park will become a car-free zone for people to walk, jog, bike and skate, according to CicLAvia’s website. The route will also include restricted parking and limited vehicle access.

    Here’s what to know ahead of the event.

    When is the event?

    CicLAvia takes place between 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Sunday, stretching for 3.6 miles between Leimert Park and Expo Park.

    How can I join the fun?

    The CicLAvia route will include multiple hubs, or stops where there will be “safe, fun and family-oriented activities,” according to the event’s website.

    The following locations will serve as hubs:

    • Leimert Park Hub: 4330 Crenshaw Blvd.
    • King Estates Hub: 1745 W. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
    • Expo Park Hub: 874 W. MLK Blvd. 
    • MLK Hub: 632 E. MLK Blvd.
    • Historic South Central Hub: 1922 S. Central Ave.

    Participants can enjoy food and activities at each of these locations. Restrooms, first aid and free water will also be available.

    Meet LAist at CicLAvia

    LAist staff will be at the Leimert Park hub in Leimert Park from 9 a.m. to 4.m. with special LAist swag. More information can be found here. See you there!

    Which streets will be closed and when?

    The following streets will be closed between 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Sunday:

    • Crenshaw Boulevard, from West Vernon Avenue to West MLK Boulevard
    • West MLK Boulevard, from Crenshaw Boulevard to South Figueroa

    Some streets may close as early as 6 a.m.

    Can vehicles cross the route at selected major intersections?

    Yes, cars can cross the CicLAvia route at the following intersections:

    • Stocker Street and Crenshaw Boulevard
    • MLK Boulevard and Arlington Avenue 
    • MLK Boulevard and Western Avenue 
    • MLK Boulevard and Normandie Avenue 
    • MLK Boulevard and Vermont Avenue

    What are the parking restrictions?

    No parking or vehicles will be allowed on the route from 1 a.m. to about 6 p.m. on Sunday.

    All driveways on the route will be blocked off from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., those who need to use their vehicles must park elsewhere before 7 a.m.

    Are there open lots near the route?

    Yes, all lots are pay lots, and you can find them through Parkme.com and Parkopedia.com.

    Can I get reimbursed for any parking expenses?

    CicLAvia can reimburse residents and business employees who regularly park on the route up to $20 per vehicle for any parking costs incurred from 8 p.m. on Saturday through 6 p.m. on Sunday.

    Just email a copy of your parking receipt and proof of residence or employment to info@ciclavia.org, with the subject line: “Parking Reimbursement.”

    Can I ride my e-bike? Are there any other types of vehicle restrictions?

    CicLAvia’s general rule is that only people-powered vehicles are allowed, with exceptions for persons with mobility restrictions.

    There are three classes of e-bikes allowed during CicLAvia:

    • Class 1: These are common, pedal-assist e-bikes.
    • Class 2: These are e-bikes that have throttles, and are allowed specifically if the power is switched off and the user is pedaling.
    • Class 3: These are faster e-bikes, whether they have throttles or not, and are allowed if the power is switched off and the user is pedaling.

    Basically: “If you’re primarily pedaling, and keeping with the flow of traffic, you’re fine,” according to organizers. Find out more here.

    Those with mobility restrictions are encouraged to use manual wheelchairs, motorized wheelchairs, scooters, pedal-assist bikes and adaptive bicycles.

  • Measure heads to November ballot
    Close up a white t-shirt being worn by a person. On the t-shirt is a blue outline of the state of California with the words "Tax the billionaires" superimposed
    A man's shirt and sticker are displayed at the Billionaire Tax Now booth at the 2026 California Democratic Party State Convention in San Francisco on Feb. 21, 2026.

    Topline:

    California hospitals and the state’s largest health workers union reached an agreement Thursday to pull two competing initiatives from the November ballot hours before a state deadline. But a separate measure to impose a one-time tax on billionaires remains headed toward voters, potentially reshaping how California funds healthcare.

    About the Billionaire Tax measure: That measure would levy a one-time 5% tax on California billionaires if approved by voters. Supporters estimate the tax would bring in $100 billion to replace recent state and federal healthcare cuts. The union accused Gov. Gavin Newsom, who tried to strike a last-minute deal to kill the ballot measure, of having “no plan” to prevent cuts projected to lose jobs and leave millions of Californians uninsured, according to recent projections.

    A history of dealmaking: For decades, Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West has used ballot initiatives to gain leverage over the healthcare industry, broker deals with lawmakers and push its political agenda forward. In addition to the wealth tax, the union had qualified an initiative to limit how much hospital executives are paid; while the California Hospital Association hit back with a proposal to limit the union’s political spending without member approval. Those two measures will no longer appear on the ballot under a deal brokered by the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO.

    California hospitals and the state’s largest health workers union reached an agreement Thursday to pull two competing initiatives from the November ballot hours before a state deadline. But a separate measure to impose a one-time tax on billionaires remains headed toward voters, potentially reshaping how California funds healthcare.

    That measure would levy a one-time 5% tax on California billionaires if approved by voters. Supporters estimate the tax would bring in $100 billion to replace recent state and federal healthcare cuts. The union accused Gov. Gavin Newsom, who tried to strike a last-minute deal to kill the ballot measure, of having “no plan” to prevent cuts projected to lose jobs and leave millions of Californians uninsured, according to recent projections.

    “We thought it was important to do everything we could to try to solve that problem,” said Dave Regan, president of Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West.

    In addition to the wealth tax, SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West had qualified an initiative to limit how much hospital executives are paid; while the California Hospital Association hit back with a proposal to limit the union’s political spending without member approval. Those two measures will no longer appear on the ballot under a deal brokered by the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO.

    Union members argued that money has been siphoned away from patient care through federal and state budget cuts as well as business decisions that support costly executive salaries. In turn, hospitals and some experts contended that capping leadership salaries would drain talent from pricey California and result in worse patient care.

    Initially the two sides were adamant that they weren’t interested in negotiating, but Thursday’s agreement is the latest reminder that few things are fixed in Sacramento politics. Both sides had raised tens-of-millions of dollars to support their proposals.

    Carmela Coyle, hospital association president and CEO, said in a statement that the agreement would “ensure high-quality health care services are accessible throughout California.”

    Lorena Gonzalez, president of the labor federation, said the deal would support “quality healthcare and good union jobs to Californians.”

    SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West declined to comment on the agreement.

    A history of dealmaking

    This marked the sixth time the union has attempted to cap healthcare executive salaries at $450,000 through state or local ballot measures.

    For decades the union led by Regan has used ballot initiatives to gain leverage over the healthcare industry, broker deals with lawmakers and push its political agenda forward.

    Voters may remember dialysis center initiatives appearing on three back-to-back ballots in 2018, 2020 and 2022. All three failed, and the dialysis industry spent hundreds of millions of dollars to defeat them.

    That strategy is what SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West does — and what it’s doing this year.

    Since 2012, the union has sponsored 48 state and local ballot initiatives spending $120 million. Most of the measures have been withdrawn or voted down. Despite those specific failures, the strategy has yielded major wins, including a $25 per hour health worker minimum wage. On that issue, the union asked voters across multiple cities to increase salaries before striking a deal with lawmakers and hospitals that included a 10-year moratorium on local minimum wage ballot measures.

    That strategy is shaping debate over this year’s most contentious measure, which would put a major question before voters: whether California should impose a new tax on its wealthiest residents to help fund healthcare.

    The proposal has drawn opposition from an unusual mix of business interests, Newsom, billionaires and progressive groups like Planned Parenthood and the California Teachers Association.

    “We have to use all of the tools in our toolbox,” union spokesperson Renée Saldaña said prior to the agreement. “We see the ballot initiative as one way to take it directly to California voters.”

    Good policy or ballot blackmail?

    It’s a game of cat-and-mouse dating back to the early 1900s. California special interests spend millions to place a ballot initiative before voters; use it for political leverage; and ultimately strike a deal with lawmakers or political rivals to pull the measures in exchange for some other benefit.

    Dan Schnur, a longtime Republican analyst and political communications professor at USC, said special interests have always taken advantage of ballot initiatives to try and advance their agendas. What makes SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West unusual is how often it repeats initiatives that fail, but the willingness to do so may be what gives the union so much political leverage.

    “A ballot initiative is the ultimate blunt instrument,” Schnur said. “The threat of a ballot measure can help shape negotiations in the Legislature on the same subject.”

    John Matsusaka, a USC law professor and executive director of the Initiative and Referendum Institute, said ballot initiatives are intended to allow voters to decide directly whether a proposal should become law. This helps bypass a Legislature that constituents may feel doesn’t actually reflect their interests.

    California groups have attempted to pass more initiatives than any other state, Matsusaka said, but wielding them for leverage is an unhealthy way to view the law.

    “Laws shouldn’t be used as bargaining chips in your negotiations in my opinion,” he said.

    Supported by the California Health Care Foundation (CHCF), which works to ensure that people have access to the care they need, when they need it, at a price they can afford. Visit www.chcf.org to learn more.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.