Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Amid Budget Crisis, Garcetti Wants to Spend $6,700 on Christmas Tree Lights

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

atwaterxmas.jpg
Photo by [cipher] via Flickr


Photo by [cipher] via Flickr
Perhaps you could file this under the list of the many symptoms contributing to Los Angeles' budget crisis, now hovering around $218 million with 1,000 jobs to be eliminated. On Today's City Council agenda, Council President Eric Garcetti has a motion requesting $6,766 for the "Glendale Boulevard and Brunswick Avenue Urban Forestry Christmas Light Installation" in Atwater Village. In the motion, Garcetti writes that there is a "great need for funding to cover the cost" of the event, which took place during the last holiday season. "Our office stepped in to help the Chamber and Neighborhood Council this year when the event was in jeopardy," explained Garcetti Spokesperson Julie Wong, who explained how the night of the lighting spurs economic activity.

"People come out to Glendale Blvd (Atwater Village's main drag) and end up eating in the restaurants and shopping in the stores," she said. "In addition, it draws people to this shopping/dining community throughout the holidays."

The costs include $4,000 for overtime and $2,766 for supplies. Garcetti is using money from the city's Street Furniture Revenue Fund, which is generated from half of all advertising placed on street furniture like bus benches and kiosks. Some people would call this the City Council's slush fund for pet projects and its something Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa would like to go towards fixing the budget.

"Revenues deposited into the Fund shall be divided equally among the Council Districts," the city charter states, which says the money can only be spent on mainly transportation related improvements such as charter buses, sidewalk improvements, speed humps and street resurfacing. However, there is one clause that allows for money to go towards "public amenities to improve the quality of life for public transit patrons, residents and businesses, including but not limited to, public safety, community and cultural awareness programs." The Christmas lights fall under the "community" programs part, says Wong.

Garcetti also has a motion on today's agenda to spend $25,000 "for consulting work associated with the creation a new streetscape design along Hollywood Boulevard to enhance the amenities for pedestrians and create continuity in the general appearance of the area."

Admittedly, $6,700 is pocket change in the big picture of L.A.'s multil-billion budget and there's no doubt spurring economic activity is important. In fact, the lack of it has at least partly caused the city's budget crisis--taxes projected to be collected by the city weren't just there because the economy was down and people weren't spending money. However, in a crisis, when every little penny is being examined by the city's budget officers, is it really the right time to bail out other groups?

Sponsored message

As one observer noted to LAist... "He couldn't get some deal with like the 99-cents store? she said. "That's crazy--$4,000 in overtime salary? How about some volunteers? Operating supplies? How about donations?"

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today