Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Memo lists up to 36 more nations on new list
    Up to 36 more countries could face travel bans to the U.S.
    Up to 36 more countries could face travel bans to the U.S.

    Topline:

    A State Department memo says dozens of countries have until Wednesday morning to come up with a plan to address some U.S. concerns, or face travel restrictions.

    Which countries are on notice? The memo went out to diplomats in about two dozen African nations, along with others in Central Asia, the Caribbean and several Pacific Island countries.

    What's next? The memo demands that they detail how they will begin to address U.S. concerns and comply with new State Department requirements by this Wednesday.

    The Trump administration is considering a move that could nearly triple the number of countries subject to a travel ban, according to a State Department memo obtained by NPR. Up to 36 additional nations could be added to the list of 19 that were placed under full or partial restrictions earlier this month.

    The memo to diplomats in about two dozen African nations, along with others in Central Asia, the Caribbean and several Pacific Island countries, demands that they detail by this Wednesday, how they will begin to address U.S. concerns and comply with new State Department requirements.

    Signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the memo, first reported by The Washington Post, says the 36 countries have been identified as having "vetting and screening information [that] is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension" of entry of their citizens to the U.S. It's the latest move in President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown that has included mass deportations of immigrants accused or convicted of criminal activity and others.


    The memo says, some of the nations are designated as state sponsors of terror, or some of their citizens have been "involved with acts of terrorism in the United States." Some lack a credible "government authority to produce reliable identity documents," keep unreliable criminal records, or are beset by "widespread government fraud," according to the memo. Other concerns include claims that the countries have high rates of citizens overstaying visas, or citizens who have been "involved in antisemitic or Anti-American activity in the United States." Countries that do not address concerns could be recommended for a travel ban as soon as August.

    Limiting entry of individuals from those countries "will help secure the American homeland and make our communities safer," said Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin in a statement to NPR.

    The memo also cites requirements that foreign governments be "fully cooperative" in removing foreign nationals when it is "vital to U.S. national security." And any specific concerns that the U.S. may have with a specific country could be "mitigated," the memo says, if that country is willing to accept deportees from the U.S. who cannot be sent back to their country of origin.

    "This is a necessary step to garner cooperation from foreign governments to accept deportation flights of their own citizens, strengthen national security, and help restore integrity to the immigration system," McLaughlin said.

    Critics of the travel bans, however, have railed against President Trump's previous bans as racially and religiously discriminatory for targeting many African and Muslim-majority nations.

    The countries listed in the memo as facing bans are: Angola; Antigua and Barbuda; Benin; Bhutan; Burkina Faso; Cabo Verde; Cambodia; Cameroon; Côte D'Ivoire; Democratic Republic of Congo; Djibouti; Dominica; Ethiopia; Egypt; Gabon; The Gambia; Ghana; Kyrgyzstan; Liberia; Malawi; Mauritania; Niger; Nigeria; Saint Kitts and Nevis; Saint Lucia; Sao Tome and Principe; Senegal; South Sudan; Syria; Tanzania; Tonga; Tuvalu; Uganda; Vanuatu; Zambia; and Zimbabwe.

    Nations already fully banned on June 4 are: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Those partially banned are Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela.

    In his first term in office, Trump banned travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries, but the order was rescinded under the Biden administration.

    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Emerging tech can help manage electricity demand
    A dark-skinned man is inserting an electric vehicle charging plug into his Nissan. He is wearing a white shirt and black pants, and his head is not shown. It is daytime, and cars are parked around him.
    A technology called "active managed charging" could alleviate strain on electricity grids as EV adoption grows.

    Topline:

    Early evening electricity demand is only expected to grow as the world moves away from fossil fuels, with more people buying induction stoves, heat pumps and electric vehicles. That’s a challenge for utilities, which are already managing creaky grids across the United States, all while trying to meet a growing demand for power. So they’re now trying to turn EVs from a burden into a boon.

    Active managed charging: One idea showing promise is using algorithms stagger when EVs charge, instead of them all drawing energy as soon as their owners plug in. The idea is for some people to charge later, but still have a full battery when they leave for work in the morning.

    Vehicle to grid: Another emerging technology allows EV batteries to supplement power available on the grid.

    Read on ... to learn more about how it all works.

    If you’re a typical American, you get home from work and start flipping switches and turning knobs — doing laundry, cooking dinner, watching TV. With so many other folks doing the same, the strain on the electrical grid in residential areas is highest at this time.

    That demand will only grow as the world moves away from fossil fuels, with more people buying induction stoves, heat pumps and electric vehicles.

    About this article

    This article was originally published by Grist, an LAist partner newsroom. Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at Grist.org. Sign up for Grist's weekly newsletter here.

    That’s a challenge for utilities, which are already managing creaky grids across the United States, all while trying to meet a growing demand for power. So they’re now trying to turn EVs from a burden into a boon.

    More and more models, for instance, feature “vehicle-to-grid,” or V2G, capabilities, meaning they can send power to the grid as needed.

    Others are experimenting with what’s called active managed charging, in which algorithms stagger when EVs charge, instead of them all drawing energy as soon as their owners plug in. The idea is for some people to charge later, but still have a full battery when they leave for work in the morning.

    A new report from the Brattle Group, an economic and energy consultancy, done for EnergyHub, which develops such technology, has used real-world data from EV owners in Washington state to demonstrate the potential of this approach, both for utilities and drivers.

    They found that an active managed charging program saves up to $400 per EV each year, and the vehicles were still always fully charged in the morning.

    Utilities, too, seem to benefit, as the redistributed demand results in less of a spike in the early evening. That, in turn, would mean that a utility can delay costly upgrades — which they need in order to accommodate increased electrification — saving ratepayers money.

    How it works

    Active managed charging works in conjunction with something called “time of use,” in which a utility charges different rates depending on the time of day. Between 4 p.m. and 9 p.m., when demand is high, rates are also high. But after 9 p.m., they fall. EV owners who wait until later in the evening to charge pay less for the same electricity.

    Time-of-use pricing discourages energy use when demand is highest, lightening the load and reducing how much electricity utilities need to generate. But there’s nothing stopping everyone from plugging in as soon as cheaper rates kick in at 9 p.m. As EV adoption grows, that coordination problem can create a new spike in demand.

    “An EV can be, on its own, twice the peak load of a typical home,” said Akhilesh Ramakrishnan, managing energy associate at the Brattle Group. “You get to the point where they start needing to be managed differently.”

    That’s where active managed charging comes in. Using an app, an EV owner indicates when they need their car to be charged, and how much charge their battery needs for the day. (The app also learns over time to predict when a vehicle will unplug.) When the owner gets home at 6 p.m., the owner can plug in, but the car won’t begin to charge. Instead, the system waits until some point in the night to turn on the juice, leaving enough time to fully charge the vehicle by the indicated hour.

    “If customers don’t believe that we’re going to get them there, then they’re not going to allow us to control their vehicle effectively,” said Freddie Hall, a data scientist at EnergyHub.

    The typical driver goes only 30 miles in a day, Hall added, requiring about two hours of charging each night. By actively managing many cars across neighborhoods, the system can more evenly distribute demand throughout the night: Folks will leave for work earlier or later than their neighbors, vehicles with bigger batteries will need more time to charge, and some will be almost empty while others may need to top up.

    They’re all still getting the lower prices with time of use rates, but they’re not taxing the grid by all charging at 9 p.m.

    “The results are actually very, very promising in terms of reducing the peak loads,” said Jan Kleissl, the director of the Center for Energy Research at UC San Diego who wasn’t involved in the report. “It shows big potential for reducing costs of EV charging in general.”

    Active managed charging would allow the grid to accommodate twice the number of EVs before a utility has to start upgrading the system to handle the added load, according to the report. (And consider all the additional demand for energy from things like data centers.) Those costs inevitably get passed down to all ratepayers. But, the report notes, active managed charging could delay those upgrades by up to a decade.

    “As EVs grow, if you don’t implement these solutions, there’s going to be a lot more upgrades, and that’s going to lead to rate impacts for everyone,” Ramakrishnan said.

    Vehicle-to-grid technology

    At the same time, EVs could help reduce those rates in the long term, thanks to V2G, a separate emerging technology.

    It allows a utility to call on EVs sitting in garages as a vast network of backup power. So when demand surges, those vehicles can send power to the grid for others to use, or just power the house they’re sitting in, essentially removing the structure from the grid and lowering demand. (And think of all the fleets of electric vehicles, like school buses, with huge batteries to use as additional power.)

    With all that backup energy, utilities might not need to build as many costly battery facilities of their own, projects that ratepayers wouldn’t need to foot the bill for.

    Active managed charging and V2G could work in concert, with some batteries draining at 6 p.m. as they provide energy, then recharging later at night. But that ballet will require more large-scale experimentation.

    “How are we going to fit in discharging a battery, as well as charging it overnight?” Hall said. “Because you do want it available the next day.”

    To cut greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible, the world needs more EVs. Now it’s just a matter of making them benefit the grid instead of taxing it.

  • Sponsored message
  • Highs in the mid 60s to low 70s
    May gray skies provide a gloomy background over the Los Angeles basin in a view with homes and skyscrapers in the background. Palm trees line some of the streets below.
    Mostly cloudy today.

    QUICK FACTS

    • Today’s weather: Mostly Cloudy
    • Beaches: 63 to 71 degrees
    • Mountains: 61 to 70 degrees
    • Inland: 69 to 74 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: None

    What to expect: A mostly cloudy day with highs in the mid 60s around the coast up to the low 70s for the valleys.

    Rain in the forecast: A low pressure system is bringing a chance of light to moderate rain to SoCal for the next few days.

    QUICK FACTS

    • Today’s weather: Mostly cloudy
    • Beaches: 63 to 71 degrees
    • Mountains: 61 to 70 degrees
    • Inland: 69 to 74 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: None

    The mostly cloudy skies today are courtesy of a low-pressure system that brings a 30 to 50% chance of showers to the region. It will be dry today, but we can't rule out a slight chance of showers tonight.

    Today's temperatures will be cooler, with highs mostly in the mid- to upper 60s for the beaches and coastal communities. The valleys will see temperatures between 68 to 73 degrees and up to 74 degrees over in the Inland Empire.

    High temperatures in the Coachella Valley will reach 70 to 75 degrees. Meanwhile, in the Antelope Valley, temperatures there will remain between 58 to 66 degrees.

    The National Weather Service says any showers will be light to moderate come Thursday into Friday morning.

  • School district plans for cuts
    Students wait to cross an intersection towards a building with large glass windows and signage on top that reads "Roosevelt High School."
    Students cross Fourth Street on their way to Roosevelt High School.

    Topline:

    Next month Los Angeles Unified School District leaders will vote on layoffs at central offices and school sites as part of a plan to save $1.4 billion over the next two years.

    Why now: LAUSD is spending more money than it brings in. There are more than 40% fewer students compared to the early 2000s and the district has not closed schools or significantly reduced staff as costs have increased. LAUSD hired more staff to support students during the pandemic, but the federal relief dollars that initially funded those positions are gone. For the last two years, the district has relied on diminishing reserves to backfill a multi-billion-dollar deficit.

    Who will be laid off? The district’s fiscal stabilization plan outlines three categories where layoffs are likely: central office ($150 million), unfunded positions ($60 million) and the Student Equity Needs Index, or “SENI” ($99 million) which supports schools with higher-need students. District staff said the exact number and types of positions will be provided to the board in the coming weeks.

    What's next: The Board is scheduled to vote on the layoffs at its Feb. 10 meeting and impacted staff will be notified by March 15 as required by California law.  “It is not a foregone conclusion that people will lose jobs,” said Superintendent Alberto Carvalho. For example, he said staff may be reassigned to vacant positions or given the opportunity to transfer to another school.

    What’s still unknown: Several factors will shape LAUSD’s spending plan including the outcome of stalled contract negotiations with the district’s teachers union, the final state budget and changes to federal education funding.

    Next month, Los Angeles Unified School District leaders will vote on layoffs at central offices and school sites as part of a plan to save $1.4 billion over the next two years.

    The district’s fiscal stabilization plan outlines three categories where layoffs are likely: central office ($150 million), unfunded positions ($60 million) and the Student Equity Needs Index, or “SENI,” ($99 million), which supports schools with higher-need students. District staff said the exact number and types of positions will be provided to the board in the coming weeks.

     “It is not a forgone conclusion that people will lose jobs,” said Superintendent Alberto Carvalho. For example, he said staff may be reassigned to vacant positions or given the opportunity to transfer to another school.

    How did we get here

    LAUSD is spending more money than it brings in. There are more than 40% fewer students compared to the early 2000s and the district has not closed schools or significantly reduced staff as costs have increased. LAUSD hired more staff to support students during the pandemic, but the federal relief dollars that initially funded those positions are gone.

    For the past two years, the district has relied on diminishing reserves to backfill a multi-billion-dollar deficit. Most recently, the district pulled $496 million from its reserve.

     “Every available reserve of the district is being used to either offset reductions that otherwise would've happened or to pay for cost increases that we're expecting over the coming years,” said chief financial officer Saman Bravo-Karimi.

    Several still-unknown factors will shape LAUSD’s spending plan, including the outcome of stalled contract negotiations with the district’s teachers union, the final state budget and changes to federal education funding.

    Weigh in on LAUSD’s planned layoffs

    The Board is scheduled to vote on the layoffs at its Feb. 10 meeting and impacted staff will be notified by March 15, as required by California law.

    Find Your LAUSD Board Member

    LAUSD board members can amplify concerns from parents, students and educators. Find your representative below.

    District 1: Map, includes Mid City, parts of South L.A.
    Board member: Sherlett Hendy Newbill
    Email: BoardDistrict1@lausd.net

    Call: (213) 241-6382 (central office); (323) 298-3411 (field office)

    District 2: Map, includes Downtown, East L.A.
    Board member: Rocío Rivas
    Email: rocio.rivas@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6020

    District 3: Map, includes West San Fernando Valley, North Hollywood
    Board member: Scott Schmerelson
    Email: scott.schmerelson@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-8333

    District 4: Map, includes West Hollywood, some beach cities
    Board member: Nick Melvoin 
    Email: nick.melvoin@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6387

    District 5: Map, includes parts of Northeast and Southwest L.A.
    Board Member: Karla Griego
    Email: district5@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-1000

    District 6: Map, includes East San Fernando Valley
    Board Member: Kelly Gonez
    Email: kelly.gonez@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6388

    District 7: Map, includes South L.A., and parts of the South Bay
    Board Member: Tanya Ortiz Franklin
    Email: tanya.franklin@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6385

  • Focus on wife's health benefits
    A light-skinned Black man with glasses, a short-cropped salt-and-pepper beard, and short-cropped salt-and-pepper hair, smiles at the camera.
    A preliminary hearing on corruptions charges facing Curren Price began Tuesday.

    Topline:

    A court hearing for Los Angeles City Councilmember Curren Price got underway Tuesday, with a focus on allegations Price was married to another woman when he collected city health insurance benefits for his wife — which prosecutors say amounted to embezzlement of city funds.

    Backstory: In addition to facing five counts of grand theft by embezzlement of public funds, Price faces four counts of conflict of interest related to votes he took on projects connected to his wife’s business and three counts of perjury by declaration related to allegations he failed to disclose financial interests related to his wife’s business.

    The details: Price has pleaded not guilty in Los Angeles County Superior Court. At the end of the preliminary hearing, which is expected to run several days, a judge will be asked to determine whether there’s enough evidence for the case to go to trial. If convicted on all charges, he faces up to 11 years behind bars.

    What's next: Ex-employees of both Price and his wife are expected to testify.

    A court hearing for Los Angeles City Councilmember Curren Price got underway Tuesday, with a focus on allegations Price was married to another woman when he collected city health insurance benefits for his wife — which prosecutors say amounted to embezzlement of city funds.

    In addition to facing five counts of grand theft by embezzlement of public funds, Price faces four counts of conflict of interest related to votes he took on projects connected to his wife’s business and three counts of perjury by declaration related to allegations he failed to disclose financial interests related to his wife’s business.

    Price has pleaded not guilty in Los Angeles County Superior Court. At the end of the preliminary hearing, which is expected to run several days, a judge will be asked to determine whether there’s enough evidence for the case to go to trial.

    If convicted on all charges, he faces up to 11 years behind bars.

    On Tuesday, prosecutors called an analyst with the city’s Personnel Department to testify and presented him with documents that showed Price placed his current wife Del Richardson on his city-issued healthcare plan from 2013 to 2017, before they were legally married.

    Deputy District Attorney Casey Higgins then showed the analyst a 1981 marriage certificate showing Price’s marriage to Suzette Price. The analyst said his office never saw the certificate.

    “We most likely would have asked questions,” said Paul Makowski, chief benefits analyst with the city’s Personnel Department.

    Prosecutors say Price bilked the city out of tens of thousands of dollars in health benefits for Richardson.

    Price has said he thought he was divorced from his wife when he signed Richardson up for the benefit. He and Suzette Price had been separated since 2002. His attorney Michael Schafler noted Price never sought benefits for both women at the same time.

    Prosecutors say the conflict of interest and perjury charges relate to Price failing to recuse himself from votes on projects that benefited his wife’s business, which provides relocation services and community engagement on big projects.

    For example, the Housing Authority of the city of Los Angeles paid Richardson & Associates more than $600,000 over two years from 2019 to 2020. During that same time, Price voted to support a $35 million federal grant and a state grant application for $252 million for the agency, according to prosecutors.

    In addition, LA Metro paid Richardson & Associates about $219,000 over two years from 2020 to 2021. Prosecutors say during that time, Price introduced and voted for a motion to award $30 million to Metro.

    Price’s staff allegedly alerted Price about both transactions as potential conflicts of interest, according to prosecutors.

    The preliminary hearing is expected to last six days.