Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • City leaders vote to explore idea for Great Park
    Cable cars ferry people above a roadway, with a city silhouette in the background.
    A rendering of a gondola public transit system.

    Topline:

    Irvine leaders voted to move forward in negotiations with a company to bring a gondola style public transit system to Great Park. 

    What does Tuesday’s vote mean: City officials will begin drawing up agreements with Swyft Cities, a company that is yet to have a gondola transit system up and running. Swyft Cities is offering Irvine a trial period of one year worth around $10 million in equipment and services to build eight gondolas operating between two stations.

    Red flags: Councilmember James Mai called Swyft Cities “an unproven start up” and said the staff report did not contain independently verified data, a detailed breakdown of long term operation costs, or information on whether the gondola system can withstand strong winds, earthquakes and intense heat.

    Read on ... for more about where the idea for a gondola originated.

    It could eventually get easier to navigate Irvine’s massive Great Park — and do it with a view.

    Irvine’s Great Park board — composed of the mayor and City Council members — voted, 5-1, to authorize the city manager to begin negotiations with a startup to build a gondola-style transit system to ferry people across the 1,300-acre space.

    But the vote came with concerns over what critics said was a lack of transparency and red flags about the project, which if completed, would be the first such public transit system in the country.

     "We've always prided ourselves in Irvine on being first," Mayor Larry Agran said. "I've learned over time that in many cases it's better be second to see what happens first."

    Tuesday’s vote means city officials will begin drawing up agreements with Swyft Cities, a company that is yet to have a gondola transit system up and running. Swyft Cities is offering Irvine a one-year trial period worth around $10 million in equipment and services if they are recognized as “the mass transit option for the Great Park.” The money will cover eight gondolas operating between two stations connecting the visitor center and balloon with a planned retail facility, as well as maintenance and operational costs for three days a week. The rest of the time the city would be on the hook.

    In their report to the board, officials noted that the elevated cable system “allows the mobility option to overcome traditional pedestrian obstacles that create complexity and cost for land-based transit systems.” Basically, the gondolas will go over buildings and park features instead around them.

    But Councilmember Kathleen Treseder and other councilmembers raised concerns about the relatively new gondola company, as well as the lack of transparency in the staff report.

    “ If I'm supportive of this motion, it's with an entire red flag on the whole entire thing,” said Councilmember James Mai.

    Issues Mai raised included:

    • The data in the staff report was from  Swyft Cities without independent verification.
    • The report did not contain a  detailed breakdown of long-term operating maintenance and upgrade costs. The city could be on the hook, he said, if the system fails. 
    • The system, he added, is proprietary, and Swyft Cities is “an unproven start up.”
    • There was no information on what happens if the technology breaks down or becomes obsolete.
    • The report did not address if the gondola system can withstand strong winds, earthquakes and high heat. 
    • During the initial trial period, the staff report did not address who was on the hook in case of accidents or liabilities.

     ”I'd hope that you guys would take that in consideration because a lot of these are not just about the fiscal issues, it's about safety as well for the residents,” Mai said.

    Given that Irvine is only negotiating a contract, City Attorney Jeff Melching told the board there is no exposure to possible liabilities.

    Chi also said that Mai’s questions and the issues raised will be addressed in a pending regulatory review.

    “If we do move forward, all of that would get taken into account and would be papered over in any agreement that we enter into with an entity to take those issues into account,” he said.

    A person wearing a black hoodie and black pants enters a gondola pushing stroller. A girl in a multicolored dress stands beside them.
    Swyft Cities licenses its gondola system from New Zealand-based Whoosh.
    (
    Courtesy Swyft Cities
    )

    What we know about the gondola system and company

    Jeral Poskey, the chief executive of Swyft Cities, said the idea for the gondola public transit system was born at Google when the tech giant was exploring solutions to connect its campus. Poskey worked at Google at the time and was introduced to the gondola public transit system. The system, Whoosh, was pioneered by a New Zealand-based company.

    While Google was interested in furthering the project, the pandemic shuttered those plans, and Poskey left to start his own firm and become the U.S. licenser for the Whoosh system.

    LAist reached out to Swyft Cities for comment and is waiting to hear back.

    The city’s current agreement with Swyft Cities

    Chi told LAist the city is currently contracted with Swyft Cities to study the viability of the gondola system. The contract is for around $200,000. And now they will move to implement the system after Tuesday’s vote.

     ”We've been having conversations with the Great Park Board for the better part of the last year, year-and-a-half about Swyft Cities,” he said. “The question really to the Great Park Board last night wasn't, you know, whether or not you approve anything, it was whether or not we want to formally start assessing Swyft and engage contract negotiations for what a system could look like in the Great Park.”

  • Youth baseball program expanding
    A child with black hair and light skin poses for a photo with a mascot wearing a Dodgers uniform.
    Logan Cattaneo, 6, poses for a photo with the Dodgers mascot during Dodgers Dreamteam PlayerFest at Dodgers Stadium in 2024.

    Topline:

    The Dodgers Foundation says it's expanding Dodgers Dreamteam, its program for underserved youth. The foundation says the program will be able to serve 17,000 kids this year, 2,000 more than last year.

    Why it matters: Now in its 13th season, the program connects underserved youth with opportunities to play baseball and softball and provides participants with free uniforms and access to baseball equipment. It also offers training for coaches in positive youth development practices, as well as wraparound services for participant families like college workshops, career panels, literacy resources and scholarship opportunities.

    How to sign up: For more information and to sign up, click here.

  • Sponsored message
  • Low snowpack could signal early fire season
    Aerial view of a forest of trees covered in snow
    An aerial view of snow-capped trees after a winter snowstorm near Soda Springs on Feb. 20, 2026.

    Topline:

    California clocked its second-worst snowpack on record Wednesday, a potentially troubling signal ahead for fire season. It’s an alarming end to a winter that saw abnormally dry conditions briefly wiped from California’s drought map in January, for the first time in a quarter-century.

    What happened? Though precipitation to date has been near average, much of it fell as rain rather than snow. Then March’s record-breaking heat melted most of the snow that remains. The state’s major reservoirs are nevertheless brimming above historic averages and are flirting with capacity, and a smattering of snow, rain and thunderstorms are dousing last month’s heat wave.

    Why it matters: Experts now warn that California’s case of the missing snowpack could herald an early fire season in the mountains. State data reports that California’s snowpack is closing out the season at an alarming 18% of average statewide, and an even more abysmal 6% of average in the northern mountains that feed California’s major reservoirs. “I think everyone's anticipating that it will be a long, busy fire season,” said Lenya Quinn-Davidson, director of the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Fire Network.

    California clocked its second-worst snowpack on record Wednesday, a potentially troubling signal ahead for fire season.

    It’s an alarming end to a winter that saw abnormally dry conditions briefly wiped from California’s drought map in January, for the first time in a quarter-century.

    Though precipitation to date has been near average, much of it fell as rain rather than snow. Then March’s record-breaking heat melted most of the snow that remains. The state’s major reservoirs are nevertheless brimming above historic averages and are flirting with capacity, and a smattering of snow, rain and thunderstorms are dousing last month’s heat wave.

    But experts now warn that California’s case of the missing snowpack could herald an early fire season in the mountains.

    On Wednesday, state engineers conducting the symbolic April 1 snowpack measurement at Phillips Station south of Lake Tahoe found no measurable snow in patches of white dotting the grassy field.

    “I want to welcome you call to probably one of the quickest snow surveys we’ve had — maybe one where people could actually use an umbrella,” joked Karla Nemeth, director of the California Department of Water Resources. “We’re getting a lot of questions about are we heading into a hydrologic drought? The answer is, I don’t know.”

    State data reports that California’s snowpack is closing out the season at an alarming 18% of average statewide, and an even more abysmal 6% of average in the northern mountains that feed California’s major reservoirs.

    Only the extreme drought year of 2015 beat this year’s snowpack for the worst on record, measuring in at just 5% of average on April 1st, when the snow historically is at its deepest.

    “I think everyone's anticipating that it will be a long, busy fire season,” said Lenya Quinn-Davidson, director of the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Fire Network.

    “Without a snowpack, and with an early spring, it just means that there’s much more time for something like that to happen.”

    ‘It’s pretty bizarre up here’ 

    In the city of South Lake Tahoe, which survived the massive Caldor Fire in the fall of 2021 without losing any structures, fire chief Jim Drennan said his department is already ramping up prevention efforts.

    “It's pretty bizarre up here right now. It really seems like June conditions more than March,” Drennan said. “People are already turning the sprinklers on for their lawns.”

    Without more precipitation, an early spring may complicate prescribed burning efforts. But Drennan said fire agencies in the Tahoe basin can start mechanically clearing fuels from forest areas earlier than usual.

    “That means we can get more work done,” he said.

    It also means homeowners need to start hardening their homes now, said Martin Goldberg, battalion chief and fuels management officer for the Lake Valley Fire Protection District, which protects unincorporated communities in the Lake Tahoe Basin’s south shore.

    Goldberg urges residents to scour their yards for burnable materials, create defensible space and reach out to local fire departments with questions. The risks are widespread — from firewood, wooden fences, gas cans, plants, pine needles — even lawn furniture stacked against a house.

    “In years past, I wouldn't even think of raking and clearing until May,” Goldberg said. “But my yard's completely cleared of snowpack, and it has been for a couple weeks now.”

    ‘A haystack fire’

    Battalion chief David Acuña, a spokesperson for Cal Fire, said fire season is shaped by more than just one year’s snowpack.

    Climate change has been remaking California’s fire seasons into fire years. And California’s recent average to abundant water years have fueled what Acuña called “bumper crops of vegetation and brush.”

    “Most of California is like a haystack. And if you’ve ever seen a haystack fire, they burn very intensely because there's layers of fuel,” Acuña said.

    Like Quinn-Davidson, Acuña wasn’t ready to make specific predictions about fires to come.

    But John Abatzoglou, a professor of climatology at UC Merced, said the temperatures and snowpack conditions this year offer a glimpse of California in the latter decades of this century, as fossil fuel use continues to drive global temperatures higher.

    How this year’s fires will play out will depend on when, where and how wind, heat, fuel and ignitions combine. But it foreshadows the consequences of a warmer California for water and fire under climate change.

    “This,” Abatzoglou said, “is yet another stress test for the future in the state.”

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • The airport will close in 2028 to become a park
    One white plane lands on the runway. Off to the right, another plan is parked.
    The Santa Monica Airport will close in 2028 and become a sprawling public park.

    Topline:

    The Santa Monica Airport will close in 2028 and become a sprawling public park that city officials say will improve quality of life and boost green space.

    What we know: The city is in the very early stages of planning how to transform the 192 acres into a park. The preliminary report shows some potential amenities of the park, such as gardens, biking trails, art galleries, a community center and much more.

    Background: After a long legal battle between the city and the Federal Aviation Administration, a settlement was reached that ruled that the city could close the more than 100-year-old airport. The park was controversial among residents because of air quality and noise concerns, and was the subject of many legal battles in recent decades.

    What’s next? The city wants to hear from residents. You’re encouraged to review the framework and fill out this survey. Feedback will be accepted until April 26.

  • Certain immigrants no longer eligible
    An adult reaches for a banana on a metal shelve as a child carries a toy rolling grocery basket with groceries inside it. On their left are shelves of canned food and other bags of food.
    Thousands of immigrants, including refugees and asylees, in California are set to lose their food assistance benefits, known as CalFresh, starting this month.

    Topline:

    Thousands of immigrants who are lawfully in California are set to lose their food assistance benefits, known as CalFresh, starting this month.

    What’s new: The changes apply to certain immigrants who are here lawfully, including refugees and asylees. It also applies to people from Iraq and Afghanistan who have special visas for helping the U.S. military overseas.

    Why now: The new restrictions stem from H.R. 1 — also known as the “Big Beautiful Bill” — which Congress passed last year.

    What’s next: Officials estimate 23,000 people in Los Angeles County will be affected. State officials say noncitizens who are currently receiving benefits will continue to get them until it’s time to renew their benefits — adding that people might be able to receive benefits again if their legal status changes to lawful permanent residents.

    Thousands of immigrants who are lawfully in California are set to lose their food assistance benefits, known as CalFresh, starting this month.

    The new restrictions stem from H.R. 1 — also known as the “Big Beautiful Bill” — which Congress passed last year.

    The changes remove eligibility for certain noncitizens, including people with refugee status and victims of trafficking. It also applies to immigrants from Iraq and Afghanistan who have special immigrant visas for helping the U.S. government overseas.

     ”These are folks … many of whom have large families that we have a commitment to as a country because we welcomed them and invited them here to find a place of refuge,” said Cambria Tortorelli, president of the International Institute of Los Angeles, a refugee resettlement agency. “They’re authorized to work and they’ve been brought here by the U.S. government.”

    The federal spending bill, H.R. 1, made sweeping cuts to social safety net programs, including food assistance and Medicaid. In signing the bill, President Donald Trump said the changes were delivering on his campaign promises of “America first.”

    Officials estimate 23,000 people in Los Angeles County will be affected. The state estimates about 72,000 immigrants with lawful presence will be affected across California.

    CalFresh is the state’s version of the federally funded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. Undocumented immigrants have not been eligible to receive CalFresh benefits.

    State officials say noncitizens who are currently receiving benefits will continue to get them until it’s time to renew their benefits — adding that people might be able to receive benefits again if their legal status changes to lawful permanent residents.

    Who the changes apply to:

    • Asylees
    • Refugees
    • Parolees (unless they are Cuban and Haitian entrants)
    • Individuals with deportation or removal withheld
    • Conditional entrants
    • Victims of trafficking
    • Battered noncitizens
    • Iraqi or Afghan with special immigrant visas (SIV) who are not lawful permanent residents (LPR)
    • Certain Afghan Nationals granted parole between July 31, 2021, and Sept. 30, 2023
    • Certain Ukrainian Nationals granted parole between Feb. 24, 2022, and Sep. 30, 2024