Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
is an arts and general assignment reporter on LAist's Explore LA team.
Published June 24, 2025 10:26 AM
Stores in L.A.'s flower district near 8th Street and San Pedro Street in downtown L.A.
(
Adolfo Guzman-Lopez/LAist
)
Topline:
Vendors in downtown L.A.’s wholesale flower district say business is down 60% after a recent immigration raid. A large part of their customer base is flower sellers hawking roses in buckets on street corners. Many of them are immigrants, and vendors say the fear of deportation is causing many to stay home.
Why it matters: Wholesale vendors, who buy their flowers from overseas, were already hurting after tariffs caused prices to rise. With the current drop in sales, many are wondering how long they can stay in business.
Why now: Immigration agents made arrests in the area earlier this month, causing chaos. Since then it’s been quiet. One floral company owner said the news was amplified on social media, and that dissemination is needlessly keeping many people away.
Normally, L.A.’s flower market is bustling with people speeding down sidewalks and indoor aisles with armfuls of flowers. But on Monday, there was plenty of elbow room.
The flower market is eerily empty
(
Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
/
LAist
)
“It's Monday, today's the day where a lot of florists come to get their flowers and as you can tell, it's kind of dead,” said Evelin Esparza, standing in her shop on 8th and San Pedro streets, surrounded by sunflowers, pink roses and white gladioli.
Listen
0:48
Rose sellers staying home impacts L.A.’s wholesale flower market
She began running Armenta Bee Flowers with her husband three years ago.
Evelin Esparza runs Armenta Bee Flowers with her husband in L.A.'s wholesale flower district.
(
Adolfo Guzman-Lopez/LAist
)
The wholesale flower district is a multi-block zone where storefronts large and small face the streets and even more businesses operate in stalls inside malls inside.
Many of them are owned and run by Spanish speaking immigrants and many of their employees are also Latin American immigrants, some without proper documentation to remain in the U.S.
Vendors at L.A.'s wholesale flower district say the sidewalks would normally be bustling on a Monday.
(
Adolfo Guzman-Lopez/LAist
)
As soon as the first raid hit … I'm in charge of our social media, I had to tell my followers and my customers, that [immigration agents] were here and they were present.
— Evelin Esparza, co-owner of Armenta Bee Flowers
Esparza said when immigration agents suddenly arrived in the area last week, it caused chaos. The owner of her mall closed the street-facing steel curtain to keep agents from coming in.
“As soon as the first [immigration] raid hit… I'm in charge of our social media and my parents are immigrants, I had to tell my followers and my people who are my customers, that [immigration agents] were here and they were present,” Esparza said.
Vendors in L.A.'s wholesale flower district cater to a range of events.
(
Adolfo Guzman-Lopez/LAist
)
For many store owners like Esparza, it had been a busy May, with graduations, Mother’s Day and other events.
But since the raids, business has dropped by 60%, she said. One big reason: street corner flower sellers, mostly immigrants, who sell roses and bouquets at traffic stops are staying away.
“They appear small, but those buyers are a big part of this business,” said Silvia Lozano, manager at My Floral Factory.
One client, Lozano said, would stop by each week to buy 1,000 bunches of 25 roses each. The client would then employ about a dozen people to distribute and sell those flowers, including family members.
Sometimes [customers] call and say, ‘Hey, how is it out there, is it still kind of rough up there?’ No, it's not [I say] but they’re scared.
— Robert Rojas, owner of flower shop in L.A.'s flower district
Lozano said only about 20% of those people are still showing up to buy flowers. But the raids have also deterred her other customers, U.S. citizens who run small and large flower-related businesses.
Fear, founded and unfounded
So far, no other immigration agents have turned up at the market. But the fear of their presence is having a powerful effect. Robert Rojas, owner of The Vinny’s Company, said his regular customers have been checking in.
“Sometimes they call and say, ‘Hey, how is it out there, is it still kind of rough up there?’ No, it's not [I say], but they’re scared,” Rojas said.
Robert Rojas said he's had to buy fewer flowers from South American purveyors since immigration raids caused business to decline.
(
Adolfo Guzman-Lopez/LAist
)
Some wonder if such pervasive fear is warranted.
“I think there's a lot of hype, so it's scaring people,” said Annette Yonemitsu, who was at the mall on Monday to buy flowers for her shop, Century City Flower Market.
She said amplification of the raids on social media is partly to blame for people staying away from the flower district.
“I was here when the helicopters were around — everybody's like, ‘They're coming in.’ Nobody came in,” she said.
How long can they hang on?
Vendors said they were already paying more for flowers after the Trump administration announced tariffs earlier this year. The vast majority of their flowers arrive by plane from Colombia and other South American countries a few days after being picked, and the announcement of tariffs had caused prices to rise.
The recent drop in business due to the raids is adding to that pain, with some wondering how long they can stay afloat.
One owner, who would not give his name, said his 10 foot by 30 foot stall costs $4,000 in monthly rent. He estimated that he can stay afloat for only two to three months at the current level of sales.
Others pay a lot more.
“ I can't wait. I got a lot of overhead. I gotta pay bills, rent,” Rojas said.
Rent for his shop and the adjacent store run by his brother is $14,000 a month, he said.
There’s also another aspect of the current atmosphere: people are having fewer get-togethers, which means lower demand for flowers for all occasions, from funerals wreaths to wedding arrangements.
“We are Latinos and we love to have parties, but people aren’t having as many parties as they used to,” Lozano said.
The Trump administration announced Thursday a three-phase transition that will move significant management of and responsibility for the nation's federal student loan portfolio from the U.S. Education Department to the U.S. Treasury Department.
Why now: The administration says the Treasury Department is better equipped to, among other things, help millions of borrowers who are in default return to repayment on their loans, though the move is also political: The latest sign of President Trump's efforts to close the Education Department.
About the three-phase plan: The deal's first phase will see Treasury resuming control of collecting on defaulted student loans, an authority it has long held but deferred to the Education Department. The agreement's second phase expands Treasury's management beyond defaulted loans to include servicing much of what's left, even the Education Department's non-defaulted debts. The third and final phase would see Treasury take over key responsibilities beyond the handling of current loans, assuming administration of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), which students are required to complete if they want to receive federal financial aid.
The Trump administration announced Thursday a three-phase transition that will move significant management of and responsibility for the nation's federal student loan portfolio from the U.S. Education Department to the U.S. Treasury Department.
The administration says the Treasury Department is better equipped to, among other things, help millions of borrowers who are in default return to repayment on their loans, though the move is also political: The latest sign of President Donald Trump's efforts to close the Education Department.
"As the Federal student aid portfolio soars to nearly $1.7 trillion and with nearly a quarter of student loan borrowers in default, Americans know that the Department of Education has failed to effectively manage and deliver these critical programs," said U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in a press release. "By leveraging Treasury's world-renowned expertise in finance and economic policy, we are confident that American students, borrowers and taxpayers will finally have functioning programs after decades of mismanagement."
More than 40 million borrowers hold federal student loans.
According to the interagency agreement obtained by NPR, the deal's first phase will see Treasury resuming control of collecting on defaulted student loans, an authority it has long held but deferred to the Education Department. A senior Education Department official told reporters that 9.2 million borrowers were in default as of the beginning of March, with another 2.4 million in late-stage delinquency on their payments.
The agreement's second phase expands Treasury's management beyond defaulted loans to include servicing much of what's left, even the Education Department's non-defaulted debts, "to the extent practicable, following Treasury's assessment of the portfolio and its operations."
The third and final phase would see Treasury take over key responsibilities beyond the handling of current loans, assuming administration of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), which students are required to complete if they want to receive federal financial aid.
The Treasury Department already plays an important role in the FAFSA, using its data-retrieval tool to expedite the once-onerous income-verification process for families.
It was nearly one year ago that President Trump suggested a very different move – that the Small Business Administration (SBA) would assume responsibility for the student loan portfolio. It's unclear why the administration changed its thinking and pivoted to the Treasury Department.
This is the 10th interagency agreement the administration has reached to disperse large swaths of the work of the Education Department to other agencies.
"The Trump Administration continues to unlawfully dismantle the Education Department by moving programs and offices to other federal agencies despite clear warning from Congress that Education Secretary Linda McMahon lacks the authority to do so," said Rachel Gittleman, president of AFGE Local 252, which represents more than 2,000 current and former employees at the U.S. Department of Education.
In response to an NPR question, a senior Education Department official acknowledged that, as was the case with many of those previous agreements, the Treasury Department cannot fully assume all the Education Department's statutory student loan obligations. The official said the department will be wound down to the extent allowable by law and that Education Secretary Linda McMahon understands that "Congress is the only entity that can close the Department."
As for what impact this may have on borrowers, the department officials told reporters: "You should see no change. This should be seamless."
The Federal Communications Commission yesterday said it had approved the merger of local television giants Nexstar Media Group and rival Tegna, the same day that two lawsuits trying to block the deal were announced.
About the deal: Nexstar said last August that it would buy Tegna for $6.2 billion.
Where things stand: The deal needed the approval of the Republican Trump administration's FCC because the government had to waive rules that limit how many local stations that one company can own. Nexstar said it had also received approval from the Justice Department, but attempts to independently confirm that were not immediately successful Thursday.
Who opposes it: Attorneys general in eight states, including California, and DirecTV filed lawsuits with the U.S. District Court in Sacramento seeking to block the merger. The lawsuits make similar arguments that the deal will lead to higher prices for consumers and stifle local journalism.
The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday said it had approved the merger of local television giants Nexstar Media Group and rival Tegna, the same day that two lawsuits trying to block the deal were announced.
Nexstar said last August that it would buy Tegna for $6.2 billion. The deal would create a company that owns 265 television stations in 44 states and the District of Columbia, most of them local affiliates of ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr said the company had agreed to divest itself of six of those stations.
The deal needed the approval of the Republican Trump administration's FCC because the government had to waive rules that limit how many local stations that one company can own. Nexstar said it had also received approval from the Justice Department, but attempts to independently confirm that were not immediately successful Thursday.
"We are grateful to President Trump, Chairman Carr and the DOJ for recognizing the dynamic forces shaping the media landscape and allowing this transaction to move forward," said Perry Sook, Nexstar's chairman and CEO.
Attorneys general in eight states and DirecTV filed lawsuits with the U.S. District Court in Sacramento, California, seeking to block the merger. The lawsuits make similar arguments that the deal will lead to higher prices for consumers and stifle local journalism.
The action was filed by the top lawyers in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Oregon and Virginia — all of them Democrats. "If this merger moves forward, cable prices will spike for consumers in New York and across the country," said Letitia James, New York attorney general, on Thursday. The state lawyers argued the merger would run afoul of federal laws designed to protect against monopolies.
Similarly, DirecTV predicted the deal would allow Nexstar to jack up the price it can extract from DirecTV and other distributors to carry their stations, "which will force them to raise prices to their subscribers."
Given Nexstar's tendency to consolidate newsrooms in communities where it owns more than one station, both lawsuits expressed concern that the merger would hurt the already struggling local news business. There are 31 markets across the country where Nexstar and Tegna own at least one station, according to the states' lawsuit.
In approving the deal, Carr said that "if you care about local news, you should care about the future of local broadcast stations." He said the deal will ensure that the broadcasters have the resources to continue investing in those operations. Sook, too, said Nexstar will be a stronger company, "better positioned to deliver exceptional journalism and local programming."
Nexstar had no direct comment on the lawsuits, a spokesman said.
The merger was endorsed in February by President Donald Trump, who wrote on social media that "we need more competition against THE ENEMY, the Fake News National TV Networks."
Anna Gomez, a Democratic member of the FCC, condemned the Republican-controlled agency's decision, saying it was done behind closed doors without an actual vote.
"Local journalism is under extraordinary strain," she said. "Across the country newsrooms are being consolidated, reporters laid off and editorial decisions made far from the communities broadcast stations are licensed to serve. The Nexstar-Tegna merger will accelerate exactly that trend, concentrating broadcast power in fewer corporate hands, shrinking independent editorial voices and prioritizing national business interests over local needs."
Nexstar flexed its muscles last fall in ordering its ABC stations to yank late-night host Jimmy Kimmel following comments he made about assassinated Republican activist Charlie Kirk, briefly leading to Kimmel's suspension. But ABC brought Kimmel back following an outcry, and Nexstar backed down.
The attorneys general said they were open to having other states support their actions — even those whose chief legal officials are Republicans.
Copyright 2026 NPR
Keep up with LAist.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
Frank Stoltze
is a veteran reporter who covers local politics and examines how democracy is and, at times, is not working.
Published March 19, 2026 4:45 PM
A mural inside the César Chávez building at Santa Ana College.
(
Destiny Torres
/
LAist
)
Topline
Public officials across California are contemplating what to do with dozens of streets, parks and libraries named in honor of civil rights icon César Chávez in the wake of allegations he sexually assaulted two girls and a woman decades ago. Chávez died in 1993.
The backstory: The allegations surfaced in an investigation by the New York Times published earlier this week that sent shock waves across the country.
Renaming a holiday: Many state and local leaders, including L.A.’s mayor and county supervisors, suggested changing the César Chávez holiday on March 31 to Farmer Workers Day. March 31 was Chávez’s birthday. In Sacramento on Thursday, Democratic leaders of the state Legislature said they would push for such a change.
What's next: The process for renaming streets and other public structures varies from city to city and school district to school district. It could take months before many cities move to erase Chávez's name from public spaces.
Read on ... for more on the movement to rename these monuments and tributes.
Public officials across California are contemplating what to do with dozens of streets, parks and libraries named in honor of civil rights icon César Chávez in the wake of allegations he sexually assaulted two girls and a woman decades ago.
The allegations surfaced in an investigation by the New York Times published earlier this week that sent shock waves across the country.
Chávez, who was head of the United Farm Workers union, is widely recognized as one of the most influential labor leaders in U.S. history, known for founding the union and for leading national boycotts of grapes to improve working conditions for farmworkers.
Chávez died in 1993.
Many state and local leaders, including L.A.’s mayor and county supervisors, suggested changing the César Chávez holiday on March 31 to Farm Workers Day. March 31 was Chávez’s birthday.
In Sacramento on Thursday, Democratic leaders of the state Legislature said they would push for such a change.
“The farmworker movement was never ever about one man,” Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas said at a news conference. “It was built by tens of thousands of workers. People who labored in the fields, people who organized, people who sacrificed and who stood up when it was hard.
“We have a responsibility to remember the movement and to move it forward with integrity.”
Also on Thursday, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass signed a proclamation renaming the city's César Chávez Day holiday as “Farm Workers Day.” The city recognizes the holiday on the last Monday of March.
“I grew up as a child admiring the farmworker movement,'' Bass said. “I didn't think I was ever going to eat grapes again because my family boycotted grapes.”
The grape strike, organized in part by Chávez, lasted five years from 1965 to 1970.
Multiple allegations of sexual assault
The New York Times investigation uncovered multiple allegations that Chávez had sexually assaulted girls and women in the 1960s and ‘70s, when he was head of United Farm Workers, including union co-founder Dolores Huerta.
Huerta, now 95, told the Times the rape and sexual assault resulted in pregnancies that she kept secret. Huerta said she gave the children up for adoption after birth.
In a statement, Huerta said in part: “... for the last 60 years [I] have kept a secret because I believed that exposing the truth would hurt the farmworker movement I have spent my entire life fighting for.”
Bass said Thursday she met Chávez once and “thought it was an opportunity of a lifetime.” She said her heart “broke” this week when she heard the allegation that Chávez had raped Huerta.
The mayor said renaming the holiday would allow people “to reflect on how the struggle of farmworkers has elevated working people everywhere.”
She added that the city would need to consider changing the names of buildings, streets and other things named in honor of Chávez.
For example, César Chávez Avenue runs through the heart of the Boyle Heights neighborhood. Several murals of Chávez dot the city.
Bass said she had been in contact with Chávez's family, and they supported her action.
The mayor was joined at the proclamation signing by Councilwoman Eunisses Hernandez, who said in a statement that the farmworker movement has always been about the power of the people, “especially the women whose labor built it and too often went unseen."
“As we honor that legacy, we also have a responsibility to tell the truth about harm and stand with survivors,” Hernandez said.
Councilwoman Ysabel Jurado also attended the news conference. She said the movement doesn’t belong to one person.
“Farm Workers Day honors the workers, families and organizers still in the fields and still fighting for fair wages, safe conditions and dignity,” the statement from Jurado read. “And it recognizes that this movement is carried forward every single day by people whose names we may never know but whose impact continues to define the spirit of Los Angeles.”
Other cities and counties
Many other cities and counties are considering wiping Chávez's name from public spaces.
L.A. County Supervisor Hilda Solis said she would introduce a motion looking at renaming the county’s César Chávez holiday.
Supervisor Janice Hahn suggested the county consider renaming Chávez day “Farm Worker Day.”
“For those of us who grew up admiring the farmworker movement, today's news is heartbreaking,'' Hahn said in a statement Wednesday. "But as in any other civil rights movement, men were only half the story. The abuses of one man will never diminish the extraordinary sacrifices, accomplishments, and legacy of the women of the farmworker movement.
“It's time we put them first.”
The process for renaming streets and other public structures varies from city to city and school district to school district. It could take months before many cities move to erase Chávez's name from public spaces.
You can follow your city council agenda to keep up with what’s going on, or better yet, reach out to your representatives on the council and county Board of Supervisors to make your voice heard on the issue.
Gov. Gavin Newsom (right) speaks as Attorney General Rob Bonta looks on during a news conference April 16, 2025, in Ceres. A new lawsuit seeks to reinstate the 2009 conclusion that carbon dioxide and other planet-warming gases threaten public health and welfare.
(
Justin Sullivan
/
Getty Images
)
Topline:
California, as well as Los Angeles County, along with a coalition of 23 other states and a dozen cities and counties, sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday for rolling back the scientific finding requiring it to regulate greenhouse gas pollution.
Why it matters: The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, seeks to reinstate a 2009 conclusion known as the endangerment finding — that carbon dioxide and other planet-warming gases threaten public health and welfare. The climate rule served as the scientific basis for the agency’s ability to limit emissions under the Clean Air Act.
California, along with a coalition of 23 other states and a dozen cities and counties, sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday for rolling back the scientific finding requiring it to regulate greenhouse gas pollution.
“This isn’t a small technical change,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta said at a press conference in Sacramento. “It’s a sweeping decision that would increase pollution, worsen climate change and put the health of millions of Americans at risk. And it’s not based on any credible science.”
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, seeks to reinstate a 2009 conclusion known as the endangerment finding — that carbon dioxide and other planet-warming gases threaten public health and welfare.
The climate rule served as the scientific basis for the agency’s ability to limit emissions under the Clean Air Act.
The Trump administration finalized the repeal of the endangerment finding Feb. 12. A post on the EPA’s website stated the change would also dissolve restrictions on vehicle emissions and save Americans $1.3 trillion.
“As a result of these changes, engine and vehicle manufacturers no longer have any future obligations for the measurement, control and reporting of GHG emissions for any highway engine and vehicle, including model years manufactured prior to this final rule.”
Sanchez said California’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the landmark 2006 Global Warming Solutions Act, AB 32, signed into law by then-Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, “remains unchanged.”
Los Angeles, San Francisco and Santa Clara counties also were parties to the suit.