Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Demand craters after ICE sweeps in downtown LA
    Flower arrangements in front of stores.
    Stores in L.A.'s flower district near 8th Street and San Pedro Street in downtown L.A.

    Topline:

    Vendors in downtown L.A.’s wholesale flower district say business is down 60% after a recent immigration raid. A large part of their customer base is flower sellers hawking roses in buckets on street corners. Many of them are immigrants, and vendors say the fear of deportation is causing many to stay home.

    Why it matters: Wholesale vendors, who buy their flowers from overseas, were already hurting after tariffs caused prices to rise. With the current drop in sales, many are wondering how long they can stay in business.

    Why now: Immigration agents made arrests in the area earlier this month, causing chaos. Since then it’s been quiet. One floral company owner said the news was amplified on social media, and that dissemination is needlessly keeping many people away.

    Go deeper: 
    PHOTOS: Valentine’s Day, a great day at L.A.’s wholesale flower district.

    Normally, L.A.’s flower market is bustling with people speeding down sidewalks and indoor aisles with armfuls of flowers. But on Monday, there was plenty of elbow room.

    The interior of a warehouse like building which houses multiple stalls. Each stall has buckets of multi colored flowers, stretching as far as the eye can see.
    The flower market is eerily empty
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
    /
    LAist
    )

    “It's Monday, today's the day where a lot of florists come to get their flowers and as you can tell, it's kind of dead,” said Evelin Esparza, standing in her shop on 8th and San Pedro streets, surrounded by sunflowers, pink roses and white gladioli.

    Listen 0:48
    Rose sellers staying home impacts L.A.’s wholesale flower market

    She began running Armenta Bee Flowers with her husband three years ago.

    Female persenting person stands next to sunflowers.
    Evelin Esparza runs Armenta Bee Flowers with her husband in L.A.'s wholesale flower district.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez/LAist
    )

    The wholesale flower district is a multi-block zone where storefronts large and small face the streets and even more businesses operate in stalls inside malls inside.

    Many of them are owned and run by Spanish speaking immigrants and many of their employees are also Latin American immigrants, some without proper documentation to remain in the U.S.

    A medium skinned man with a baseball cap walks down a sidewalk with long plants in his arms.
    Vendors at L.A.'s wholesale flower district say the sidewalks would normally be bustling on a Monday.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez/LAist
    )

    As soon as the first raid hit … I'm in charge of our social media, I had to tell my followers and my customers, that [immigration agents] were here and they were present.
    — Evelin Esparza, co-owner of Armenta Bee Flowers

    Esparza said when immigration agents suddenly arrived in the area last week, it caused chaos. The owner of her mall closed the street-facing steel curtain to keep agents from coming in.

    “As soon as the first [immigration] raid hit… I'm in charge of our social media and my parents are immigrants, I had to tell my followers and my people who are my customers, that [immigration agents] were here and they were present,” Esparza said.

    
A flower arrangement in the shape of a heart.
    Vendors in L.A.'s wholesale flower district cater to a range of events.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez/LAist
    )

    For many store owners like Esparza, it had been a busy May, with graduations, Mother’s Day and other events.

    But since the raids, business has dropped by 60%, she said. One big reason: street corner flower sellers, mostly immigrants, who sell roses and bouquets at traffic stops are staying away.

    “They appear small, but those buyers are a big part of this business,” said Silvia Lozano, manager at My Floral Factory.

    One client, Lozano said, would stop by each week to buy 1,000 bunches of 25 roses each. The client would then employ about a dozen people to distribute and sell those flowers, including family members.

    Sometimes [customers] call and say, ‘Hey, how is it out there, is it still kind of rough up there?’ No, it's not [I say] but they’re scared.
    — Robert Rojas, owner of flower shop in L.A.'s flower district

    Lozano said only about 20% of those people are still showing up to buy flowers. But the raids have also deterred her other customers, U.S. citizens who run small and large flower-related businesses.

    Fear, founded and unfounded

    So far, no other immigration agents have turned up at the market. But the fear of their presence is having a powerful effect. Robert Rojas, owner of The Vinny’s Company, said his regular customers have been checking in.

    “Sometimes they call and say, ‘Hey, how is it out there, is it still kind of rough up there?’ No, it's not [I say], but they’re scared,” Rojas said.

    A person among buckets with flowers
    Robert Rojas said he's had to buy fewer flowers from South American purveyors since immigration raids caused business to decline.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez/LAist
    )

    Some wonder if such pervasive fear is warranted.

    “I think there's a lot of hype, so it's scaring people,” said Annette Yonemitsu, who was at the mall on Monday to buy flowers for her shop, Century City Flower Market.

    She said amplification of the raids on social media is partly to blame for people staying away from the flower district.

    “I was here when the helicopters were around — everybody's like, ‘They're coming in.’ Nobody came in,” she said.

    How long can they hang on?

    Vendors said they were already paying more for flowers after the Trump administration announced tariffs earlier this year. The vast majority of their flowers arrive by plane from Colombia and other South American countries a few days after being picked, and the announcement of tariffs had caused prices to rise.

    The recent drop in business due to the raids is adding to that pain, with some wondering how long they can stay afloat.

    One owner, who would not give his name, said his 10 foot by 30 foot stall costs $4,000 in monthly rent. He estimated that he can stay afloat for only two to three months at the current level of sales.

    Others pay a lot more.

    “ I can't wait. I got a lot of overhead. I gotta pay bills, rent,” Rojas said.

    Rent for his shop and the adjacent store run by his brother is $14,000 a month, he said.

    There’s also another aspect of the current atmosphere: people are having fewer get-togethers, which means lower demand for flowers for all occasions, from funerals wreaths to wedding arrangements.

    “We are Latinos and we love to have parties, but people aren’t having as many parties as they used to,” Lozano said.

  • Why Trump administration is challenging new law
    People carry signs reading: TANNC Amazon UPL Strike in white, gold and black.
    Manny Ruiz strikes alongside other workers with Teamsters 2785 at Amazon Warehouse DCK6 in the Bayview District in San Francisco on Dec. 19, 2024. Amazon workers at multiple facilities across the U.S. went on strike to fight for a union contract.

    Topline:

    Under a law taking effect Jan. 1, California seeks to uphold the labor and unionization rights of private-sector employees, as the federal agency that has held that power for decades is in limbo.

    Where things stand: The new law’s future is unclear because the Trump administration is challenging it.

    Why now: The law, which grants more powers to the California Public Employment Relations Board, is a response to the National Labor Relations Board lacking a quorum. President Donald Trump fired the NLRB’s chairperson, Gwynne Wilcox, days after he began his second term in January. His two nominees to the board have yet to be confirmed, so the federal board has been without the three members it needs for a quorum for months.

    California under a law taking effect today seeks to uphold the labor and unionization rights of private-sector employees, as the federal agency that has held that power for decades is in limbo.

    But the new law’s future is unclear because the Trump administration is challenging it.

    The law, which grants more powers to the California Public Employment Relations Board, is a response to the National Labor Relations Board lacking a quorum.

    President Donald Trump fired the NLRB’s chairperson, Gwynne Wilcox, days after he began his second term in January. His two nominees to the board have yet to be confirmed, so the federal board has been without the three members it needs for a quorum for months.

    Assemblymember Tina McKinnor, the Inglewood Democrat who wrote the bill, said when the governor signed it in September that “California will not sit idly as its workers are systematically denied the right to organize due to employer intransigence or federal inaction.”

    The NLRB sued California over the law in October, saying in its lawsuit that the state is trying to assert authority over “areas explicitly reserved for federal oversight.”

    On the legal challenge to the law, Terry Schanz, McKinnor’s chief of staff, referred CalMatters to the state attorney general. Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office is responsible for defending the law in court. A spokesperson for Bonta said the office would have nothing to say about it.

    With the NLRB unable to fulfill its duties, states are trying to fill the gap in enforcing the National Labor Relations Act, which Congress passed in 1935. But labor experts contacted by CalMatters do not have high hopes for the California law, which is similar to a law passed in New York this year. They said courts, including the Supreme Court, have ruled that states cannot decide matters pertaining to federal labor law because of preemption, the doctrine that a higher authority of law overrides a lower authority.

    “It’s difficult to imagine a scenario where the courts do not overturn these (state) laws,” said John Logan, professor and chairperson of Labor and Employment Studies at San Francisco State University.

    William Gould, a former chairperson of the National Labor Relations Board during the Clinton administration and a professor emeritus at Stanford University, agreed: “In the courts the matter is a dead letter unless (the Supreme Court) shifts gears.”

    That’s what the California and U.S. chambers of commerce, along with other business groups, are hoping, according to their amicus brief in support of the Trump administration’s lawsuit against California: “Under California’s view, every state could have its own labor law for private-sector workers. Dozens of laws would overlap and collide.”

    The California Labor Federation, an umbrella organization for unions that represents about 2 million California workers, said in an amicus brief that even before Trump fired the NLRB chief, the federal agency’s backlog had been a problem, leading to companies being able to delay bargaining in good faith with their employees’ unions without consequences.

    If the California law is overturned, employees who have formed unions but have not succeeded in securing contracts with employers such as Amazon and Starbucks — which are among the companies seeking to have the NLRB declared unconstitutional — may continue to face delays, according to Logan. Or, he said, it’s not clear what would happen if other workers tried to organize and their companies simply fired them.

    “The NLRB defunctness is a scandal which cries out for political reform,” Gould said.

  • Sponsored message
  • Photos from New Year's Eve around the world

    Topline:

    Check out celebrations around the world.

    Why now: As the clock struck midnight across time zones, people gathered to celebrate the new year.

    Keep reading... for those photos.

    As the clock strikes midnight across time zones, people gather to celebrate the new year.

    We take a look at the shared joy and traditions in these photos.
    Copyright 2026 NPR

    Falling balloons and confetti drop on people.
    Reveler use their smartphones to film the falling balloons and confetti as they celebrate the start of 2026 during the New Year countdown event held at a shopping mall in Beijing, early Thursday, Jan. 1, 2026.
    (
    Andy Wong
    /
    AP
    )
    2026 in lights.
    Revellers watch a fireworks and light show for children on Museumplein as part of New Year's Eve celebrations in Amsterdam on December 31, 2025.
    (
    Remko de Waal
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    Large crowd of revelers.
    Members of the public gather to celebrate the New Year during the annual bell-tolling ceremony at the Bosingak Pavilion on January 01, 2026 in Seoul, South Korea.
    (
    Chung Sung-Jun
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    Skyscrapers are lined in lights with fireworks in the dark sky.
    Fireworks explode over skyscrapers during New Year celebrations on January 01, 2026 in Makati, Metro Manila, Philippines.
    (
    Ezra Acayan
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    People hold lighted New Year's wishes.
    People buy batons that read happy New Year 2026 on December 31, 2025 in Bangkok, Thailand. Thousands lined the Chao Phraya river in Bangkok as the country welcomed the new year.
    (
    Lauren DeCicca
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    Fireworks light up the sky.
    Fireworks explode from the Taipei 101 building during the New Year's celebrations in Taipei, Taiwan, Thursday, Jan. 1, 2026.
    (
    Chiang Ying-Ying
    /
    AP
    )
    White fireworks over a bridge.
    Revellers watch the New Year's Eve fireworks from the The Huc Bridge at Hoan Kiem Lake in Hanoi on Jan. 1, 2026.
    (
    Nhac Nguyen
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    People wear 2026 hats.
    People attend the New Year countdown event to celebrate the start of 2026 in the Central district of Hong Kong, on Wednesday, Dec. 31, 2025.
    (
    Chan Long Hei
    /
    AP
    )
    Muli-colored fireworks.
    Fireworks explode around the Burj Khalifa, the world's tallest building, during New Year's Eve celebrations in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Thursday, Jan. 1, 2026.
    (
    Fatima Shbair
    /
    AP
    )
    2026 is in lights.
    People pose for pictures near illuminated decorations on New Year's Eve in Mumbai, India, Wednesday, Dec. 31, 2025.
    (
    Rafiq Maqbool
    /
    AP
    )
    Fireworks over a domed building.
    Revellers watch fireworks during the New Year celebrations in Karachi on January 1, 2026.
    (
    Rizwan Tabassum
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    Heart arches are lighted.
    Iraqis gather in Baghdad's Al-Zawraa Park during New Year's Eve celebrations on December 31, 2025.
    (
    Ahmad Al-Rubaye
    /
    AFP/Getty Images
    )
    White lights in 2026 along with a deer and a gazebo.
    Onlookers stand beside light ornaments on New Year's Eve at Bakrkoy Square in Istanbul on Dec. 31, 2025.
    (
    Yasin Akgul
    /
    Getty Images
    )
    Two people strike a big bell.
    People strike a giant bell to celebrate the New Year at the Zojoji Buddhist temple, minutes after midnight Thursday Jan. 1, 2026, in Tokyo.
    (
    Eugene Hoshiko
    /
    AP
    )
    People are sillhouetted against a setting sun in a cloudy sky.
    A couple takes a selfie as the last sunset of 2025 is seen over the Mediterranean Sea in Beirut, Lebanon, Wednesday, Dec. 31, 2025.
    (
    Hassan Ammar
    /
    AP
    )
    A ferris wheel is lighted with the word "happy."
    People watch and take photos as the Ferris wheel displays "Happy New Year" in 16 different languages at Pacific Park on Wednesday, Dec. 31, 2025 in Santa Monica.
    (
    Juliana Yamada
    /
    Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
    )

  • Bipartisan group is working on a compromise

    Topline:

    Millions of Americans are facing higher health care premiums in the new year after Congress allowed Affordable Care Act subsidies to expire.

    Where things stand: Earlier this week, a bipartisan group of senators worked to strike a compromise that could resurrect the enhanced ACA premium tax credits — potentially blunting the blow of rising monthly payments for Obamacare enrollees.

    What's next: Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., who is part of that effort, says he thinks the Senate can pass a "retroactive" Affordable Care Act subsidy extension, but "we need President Trump."

    Millions of Americans are facing higher health care premiums in the new year after Congress allowed Affordable Care Act subsidies to expire. But earlier this week, a bipartisan group of senators worked to strike a compromise that could resurrect the enhanced ACA premium tax credits — potentially blunting the blow of rising monthly payments for Obamacare enrollees.

    "There's a number of Republican and Democratic senators who are seeing what a disaster this will be for families that they represent," Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., said on Morning Edition Thursday. "That's the common ground here, and it's a doable thing."

    Welch said he joined a bipartisan call Tuesday — first reported by Punchbowl News — in which a handful of senators charted out a possible health care compromise.

    "We could extend the credits for a couple of years, we could reform it," Welch said of the call. "You could put an income cap, you could have a copay, you could have penalties on insurers who commit fraud. You actually could introduce some cost saving reductions that have bipartisan support."

    But according to Welch, this legislation is only doable with President Trump's blessing.

    "It would require that President Trump play a major role in this, because he has such influence over the Republican majority in the House and even in the Senate," Welch said.

    Last fall, Republicans and Democrats fought bitterly over the Obamacare subsidy extension, causing a political standoff that led to the longest government shutdown in U.S. history. Meanwhile, Trump has remained relatively hands-off, withholding his support for any health care legislation.

    Despite these obstacles, Welch said he believes the jump in prices that people across the country now face will break the logjam in Congress.

    "A farmer in Vermont, their premium is going to go from $900 a month to $3,200, a month," Welch said. "So they're going to really face sticker shock. There's going to be a secondary impact, because the hospitals, particularly in rural areas, are going to lose revenue."

    But even if the Senate advanced a compromise bill on the ACA, the House would also have to get behind it. And the lower chamber has its own bipartisan effort on an ACA subsidy extension.

    Just before the recess began in mid-December, four House Republicans joined Democrats in signing a discharge petition on a three-year extension of the ACA subsidies — forcing a floor vote on the bill when the House returns.

    Hours after bucking House Speaker Mike Johnson and joining Democrats, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., told Morning Edition back in December that he thinks this vote will get even more Republican support.

    "I don't like the clean extension without any income cap," Fitzpatrick said. "But given the choice between a clean three-year extension and letting them expire, that's not a hard choice for me. And I suspect many of my other colleagues are going to view it the same way."

    Fitzpatrick and Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-N.Y., have held meetings with moderate senators on legislative paths to extend the ACA subsidies, a source familiar with the talks but not authorized to speak publicly tells NPR.

    The Senate returns on Jan. 5 and the House comes back to Capitol Hill on Jan. 6.

    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • New CA laws take aim at fraud, out-of-state dogs
    A group of men in women stand next to each other on steps outside a building while smiling. Two of the women are holding black and white puppies.
    State lawmakers Steve Bennett, Marc Berman and Tom Umberg celebrate the passage of new legislation to protect consumers and animals from deceptive practices in the pet industry.

    Topline:

    California is once again taking steps to limit the influx of dogs from out-of-state puppy mills with a package of laws that take effect in the new year.

    What the laws do: AB 519, authored by Assemblymember Marc Berman, D-Menlo Park, prohibits both in-person and online pet brokers from selling dogs, cats or rabbits under a year old. In addition to the pet broker ban, the “Stop The Puppy Mill Pipeline” legislative package includes two other bills that aim to protect consumers from deceptive third-party pet sellers. The laws are part of a slate of statewide animal protections that will go into effect today, including a ban on declawing cats.

    Why now: Lawmakers introduced these bills to close loopholes that emerged after California’s initial effort to shut down the puppy mill pipeline.

    The backstory: In 2019, California led the nation in banning pet stores from selling dogs from commercial breeders, also called puppy mills, which prioritize profits over animals’ welfare. But the law did not cover online marketplaces, and resellers cropped up to take the place of pet stores.

    Read on ... for more on what's changing today.

    California is once again taking steps to limit the influx of dogs from out-of-state puppy mills with a package of laws that take effect in the new year.

    AB 519, authored by Assemblymember Marc Berman, D-Menlo Park, prohibits both in-person and online pet brokers from selling dogs, cats or rabbits under a year old.

    “The goal is that this will … funnel Californians into the legitimate avenues for either purchasing or rescuing an animal, and it’ll make it harder for bad people to do bad things,” Berman said.

    The bill defines a broker as a person or business that sells, processes or transports a pet bred by someone else for profit. It carves out exceptions for shelters, rescues and educational nonprofits teaching kids to care for animals. Service animals and those involved with government agencies, like police dogs, are also exempt.

    In addition to the pet broker ban, the “Stop The Puppy Mill Pipeline” legislative package includes two other bills that aim to protect consumers from deceptive third-party pet sellers. The laws are part of a slate of statewide animal protections that will go into effect on Jan. 1, including a ban on declawing cats.

    AB 506 by Assemblymember Steve Bennett, D-Ventura, voids any pet contracts that include a nonrefundable deposit or fail to disclose the pet’s medical information and breeder origin. If a contract is voided, the purchaser is entitled to a refund and is not required to return the pet.

    SB 312 by state Sen. Tom Umberg, D-Santa Ana, requires dog importers to send health certificates to the buyer and the California Department of Food and Agriculture at least 10 days before the dog enters the state. The CDFA must keep these records for five years and make them publicly available.

    Lawmakers introduced these bills to close loopholes that emerged after California’s initial effort to shut down the puppy mill pipeline.

    In 2019, California led the nation in banning pet stores from selling dogs from commercial breeders, also called puppy mills, which prioritize profits over animals’ welfare. But the law did not cover online marketplaces, and resellers cropped up to take the place of pet stores, as revealed by a 2024 Los Angeles Times investigation.

    The report detailed truckloads of designer dogs, many of them abused and neglected, shipped into the state from commercial breeders in the Midwest. Consumers were advertised puppies from small, local breeders on online marketplaces and unwittingly ended up with sick puppies requiring expensive veterinary care. In one case, a puppy died within weeks.

    Brittany Benesi, the senior legislative director for the Western division of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, said these online marketplaces hide the origin and condition of animals even more than brick-and-mortar pet stores do.

    “You can go to these websites and they will tell you the astrological sign of a puppy, but you could not find out who that puppy was bred by,” Benesi said.

    She argues that the 2019 bill effectively shut off one valve of the puppy mill pipeline, but the online market took advantage of that absence. The ASPCA, which co-sponsored the legislative package, expects these new laws to shut off the online valve as well.

    “I think California is such a large, powerful market that these retailers are going to have a really hard time making up for the loss,” Benesi said. “And it may force their hand to change their business models or their business practices in order to regain the California market.”

    Opponents of AB 519 argue the law will have a similar unintended consequence as the 2019 retail ban, which they see as having worsened the underground market for puppies.

    “You’re once again removing the ability for Californians to access well-regulated, well-run and folks that have oversight, both in the animal welfare and consumer protection areas,” said Alyssa Miller-Hurley, the vice president for government affairs for the Pet Advocacy Network, a national trade association representing breeders, retailers and distributors. “And it’s just going to exacerbate a problem that, unfortunately, already exists.”

    By preventing USDA-licensed pet brokers from selling puppies under a year old, Miller-Hurley said this law will push consumers “into the shadows” and force them to work with unregulated online markets like Craigslist, Facebook Marketplace and even TikTok.

    “How do you enforce something … over some random person selling an animal on TikTok Live?” Miller-Hurley said.

    Animal welfare groups have long been critical of the standards for licensed dog dealers. In 2024, USDA investigations at commercial breeding operations found more than 800 direct violations, according to an ASPCA report. Only two dealers lost their licenses and not a single dog was removed from the facility.

    “The federal laws around animal welfare are very, very low bars to meet,” Benesi said. “The USDA licensure allows for dogs to be kept in wire cages with only six inches of space on any side of them for their entire lives, breeding out litter after litter after litter.”

    California Attorney General Rob Bonta supported all three bills, and Benesi said the office has made it clear they are committed to enforcing them. She said groups like the ASPCA, as well as the public, will help monitor and file complaints to the attorney general’s office.

    Although they oppose the broker ban, the Pet Advocacy Network supports stronger regulations on the puppy trade, like Umberg’s bill, streamlining pet medical information to a single department.

    Previously, California required importers to send certificates of veterinary inspection to individual counties. However, many counties were unaware they were supposed to receive them, and many importers would send them to the CDFA, which deleted the files.

    “We’re happy to see California join what most of the states already do, which is allow the state department of agriculture or department health to have oversight of these critical pieces of information,” Miller-Hurley said.

    This holiday season, as Californians welcome new furry family members to their homes, Benesi encourages people to consider adopting through a rescue or shelter.

    For those working with a breeder, she urges prospective pet owners to see where the puppy was raised, meet its parents in person and vet the breeder as carefully as the breeder should be vetting them.