Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Jurado talks housing issues, public safety, more
    A woman with medium-light skin tone and short dark hair wearing a lavender blazer and a beige and maroon scarf places an "I Voted" sticker on her blazer while smiling and looking towards left of frame.
    Yasabel Jurado places an "I Voted" sticker on her blazer after voting at the Arroyo Seco Regional Library in Los Angeles, California on Nov. 5, 2024.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles City Council District 14 will soon have a new representative in Ysabel Jurado. LAist's "Morning Edition" talks with Jurado about her top priorities — tackling the homelessness crisis, guaranteed housing for all, and public safety.

    Why it matters: She defeated incumbent Kevin DeLeon earlier this month after a tense race, scooping up 57% of the vote, in the district that includes parts of Boyle Heights, Highland Park and downtown L.A.

    Why now: Jurado will join the incoming City Council on Dec. 9.

    Listen 15:42
    Jurado pledges to stop 'eviction to homelessness pipeline,' and says LA can't police it's way out of problems

    Los Angeles City Council District 14 will soon have a new representative in Ysabel Jurado.

    She defeated incumbent Kevin de León earlier this month after a tense race, scooping up 57% of the vote in the district that includes parts of Boyle Heights, Highland Park and downtown L.A.

    Jurado — a tenant rights attorney, daughter of undocumented Filipino immigrants, and single mother — spoke with LAist's Morning Edition host Austin Cross about her top priorities as the newly-elected councilmember. This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

    Housing issues in CD14

    LAist: Let's talk about housing because your background as a tenant, your background as a tenant rights attorney gives you a unique perspective. What are the most urgent housing issues that you're seeing in your district right now?

    Jurado: We have to stop the eviction to homelessness pipeline, strengthen our renter protections, actually fund the departments that can enforce it to make sure that folks like our seniors can stay in the housing that they've stayed in for the majority of their lives.

    That is a huge issue for us. So making sure that renters have a place to stay, using the ULA funds that we all voted for to make sure that seniors can still stay in these low income affordable units for the duration of their livelihood, right? Making sure that folks can age well in the neighborhoods in which they're choosing.

    And when it comes to homelessness, this district is home to Skid Row and we haven't had a City Council leader that's been able to corral all of the agencies, non profits, mutual aid groups that are coordinating in that area. And so wanting to work hand in glove with Supervisor Hilda Solis to really attack Skid Row's homelessness problem and try out new things.

    They may not always work out, but we can't keep doing the same things and expecting different results.

    Public land for more housing

    LAist: In the past, you've pointed to Hilda Solis' Care First Village as an effective, more affordable model for housing. You've also spoken about community land trusts. That was a part of your housing platform. What kind of housing solutions will you prioritize? What do you think is going to bring the most change the most quickly?

    Jurado: I mean, one of them is the Care First Villages, right? Supervisor Solis was able to use public lands to build transitional and interim housing for unhoused people, whether it's women, whether it's seniors, whether it's young folks who are just newly unhoused, and able to stand that up in less than six months using rehabbed shipping containers, and that's something that we can be doing in the city.

    LAUSD, the county, and the city — we have all of these unused parcels that are underutilized. We already know which ones they are, we should really start leveraging them in that same way to create more interim housing, especially in this district. Comparatively to other districts, this district has less interim housing sites, based on sheer location and numbers.

    The second thing is, yes, working with community land trusts, using the public monies we raised through ULA, in order to help give tenants a pathway to homeownership, promising them permanent affordability, making sure that's embedded in the covenant for the housing.

    Obstacles to combatting homelessness

    LAist: Just looking at some of the numbers, councilmember, L.A. city's latest point in time homeless count saw a 10.4% drop in unsheltered homelessness in the past year. We're still talking about close to 30,000 people living on the streets in L.A. city alone, about 75,000 in the county. What's not happening in your view, though? And how do we speed up the change?

    Jurado: Part of it is even just looking at the numbers of shelter beds that we have. The city controller has put out a great briefing on this and showing how we're just not meeting the demand and the need.

    CD14 is one of the districts that has the most, and I think there's a lot of discretionary funds that they could be using to tackle these crises head on and yet isn't. I think part of it has to do with priorities and failed leadership and, you know, lack of interest. And so looking at the inspiration from the Care First Village of like innovating through shipping containers, using public lands, we all have the opportunity in this district and we should really be doing that to meet the moment right now with our homeless crisis here in LA.

    "F— the police" controversy

    LAist: I want to go back to a time during the campaign. There was a moment in that campaign that made national news, and that was your response to a question about police budgets during a public forum at Cal State LA. You quoted a song by N. W. A. Would you have handled that question differently?

    Jurado: I mean, I was talking to students and I was reflecting back the sentiment of folks in this district in which, you know, they are concerned with over policing. I think, you know, if anybody knows a parent or someone that's talking to you, or even a group that maybe you're not necessarily a part of, you start from a point of reference in which . . . we'll do something that's familiar to them and then drift off to a further point.

    And at the end of the day, we were having a conversation about how neighborhoods like Boyle Heights and El Sereno, you know, they want more policing, but at the same time, they don't want to be over policed. They don't want to call the police when they're the victim and then suddenly be arrested for being the suspect, which is a reality that is far too common than we care to admit, right?

    And so, I think we can all have a conversation, a mature one at that, about public safety and also about accountability at the same time. And so, that's what we were having that day, and we can continue to have that as we continue moving forward and looking at our city and trying to figure out what's best for, you know, the constituents in CD14 and greater L.A.

    LAist: I mean, a lot of people would say, "Yeah, there's a real benefit to connecting with your audience, meeting them where they are at," — the lyrics of that song, is that your personal view of the police?

    Jurado: No. . . you know, the song is a criticism. Like when we think about the song and why it was created, it was created [in] the wake of the violence of Rodney King in an L.A. that was torn.

    That's where I grew up. That is, I grew up in Highland Park before it was cool and public safety was a real big issue for me and even one of my cousins joined a gang and got caught up in trouble and struggles with recidivism. And so I think the reality of that is still here. Part of why I ran was, you know, the racial reckoning we were promised post George Floyd, that doesn't feel like it's been reckoned with — really.

    And so I think when we look at public safety, it looks different for every community, and my constituents do want more police, and it's about public safety and police accountability. And also thinking about the bigger issues, right? What we've been doing has not been working.

    On the LAPD

    LAist: I'm sure there will be some efforts to invest in those but looking at topics such as the LAPD staffing levels, they have hit their lowest mark in more than two decades. In your view, should the size of the LAPD grow, shrink, or stay the same?

    Jurado: The department has been funded more than it's ever been before. But when we look at departments like street lighting, it's funded less than 1% and has been continued to be cut over the years, especially as we head into a financial deficit. We're looking at CD14 where downtown nearly half of all the lights are out, where every main street in this district, Eagle Rock, Highland Park, El Sereno, down the street from my house, every light has a sign that says out of service call this number, you call the number, and it goes to no one, and the reality is 70% of these lights are out because of lack of maintenance.

    Because we've underfunded a department. And so when we think about safety, I really think we should be broadening it, because we know the studies show that lighting industry cleanliness contributes to the safety of a neighborhood.

    LAist: I will say on the topic of street lights, that is a topic that we have covered extensively here. There is a task force involving the LAPD regarding those lights because some of the wiring has been removed possibly for profit by individuals. I do want to come back though to my question about LAPD and their size and their budgets. Should they grow, shrink, or stay the same?

    Jurado: At the end of the day, we have to look at what's been working and we can't keep doing the same things and expecting different results. And they have already, you know, they've been spot on. They've been paid more than they've ever been before. I don't know if you know this — in the past year, due to bad policing and the liability claims from that, the city has had to dip into 300 million of its reserves.

    That's our emergency funds and that was in the first three months of the year, 300 million. And if we continue on that rate, we are going to bankrupt the city, and next year, the city council may need to declare a fiscal emergency, and so every expense after that declaration would have to be voted by a 15-member council. . . So I think we really have to be critical about the choices that we're making in funding departments in this next year, especially with a lot of our responsibilities as council members to our constituents, but also with these global events that are coming up in our city.

    LAist: Although you did say that the people within your district, they do want police. How do you find that balance when it sounds as though they might need more police, more hiring might be necessary at this point? It sounds to me as though you aren't really in a position right now to say that you want to put more money toward the hiring of more LAPD officers.

    Jurado: When we look at our budget, how can we allocate more money that we don't have? And reimagining public safety and widening what that view means, means different things for every community.

    And so part of our first 100 days, in addition to lighting up CD14 . . .doing some deep listening and deep canvassing, which is what we intend to do in our first 100 days, to talk to all of our constituents and see what that is.

    The budget cycle is going to come again as it does every single year, but we're in a big fiscal deficit and it sounds like we're not going to have enough money to fund many things this next year.

    Street safety and reducing traffic fatalities in CD 14

    LAist: What are your plans to improve street safety? Maybe what recommendations would you make to reduce those fatalities?

    Jurado: Increasing the multi-modality of downtown is important, but even in neighborhoods like Boyle Heights, which is a neighborhood that is considered a hot spot because it's bordered by a lot of freeways, it is one of the areas where there are a lot of traffic fatalities. So looking at how we can reduce the distraction of drivers, increase the ability to have reliable, accessible transit, and make sure that we do have the cleanliness and the city services to make sure the streets are actually safe for folks and pedestrians alike.

    What gives Jurado hope about LA's future?

    LAist: My last question, you're entering office at a challenging time for the city. What gives you hope about LA's future? 

    Jurado: I always said on the campaign trail, we always find joy in the struggle. Whether we're singing at the picket line or, you know, we're going to organize a party to raise money for someone who needs legal funds.

    And I think that this group of people that have elected me have always been able to find joy and work and living in community with one another. And I think that will continue no matter who their elected is, but being elected can uplift that joy and make it easier for people to feel that has always been kind of the thing that brings me joy, right?

    And throughout this campaign that has been a through line for me, and everyone that has chipped in has always provided me with some hope that they have for CD 14. So starting a new chapter, having radical colleagues who are willing to join me in the struggle, and all the people that we are serving who still are resolving the problems on their own, creatively and without a budget all the time.

    And making sure that working class voices are heard and we'll do it alongside them.

  • 10 things that wowed NPR staffers

    Topline:

    The 2026 World Cup has ended — after almost six weeks, 104 matches and games spread across three countries: the United States, Canada and Mexico. Here are some of the moments that stood out to NPR's team of journalists who covered the tournament.

    More countries, more excitement: People were treated to some remarkable soccer games. Let's not forget the hand-wringing when the announcement was made about expanding the number of countries from 32 to 48.

    Those World Cup debutants — or those that hadn't been in decades — were just delightful. Scotland (and their wonderful fans), anyone? People from other countries enjoying and exploring the U.S. and posting the absolute best social media videos about it.

    And what about African countries powering into the knockout rounds? Soccer at its best.
    Enthusiasm for U.S. team: There was the roar from the crowd in Seattle when forward Folarin Balogun forced an own goal when the U.S. faced Australia. Or the screams in Santa Clara, Calif., when midfielder Malik Tillman hit the free kick to put the U.S. up 2-0 despite being shorthanded after the Balogun red card.

    The U.S. still has a long way to go to match the passion of, say, Argentina when it comes to our national soccer team but here's hoping that the passion will linger for a long time to come.

    Read on . . . for more of the top moments from the World Cup 2026.

    The 2026 World Cup has ended — after almost six weeks, 104 matches and games spread across three countries: the United States, Canada and Mexico.

    Spain is the World Cup champion again, defeating the defending champion Argentina to claim its second title. With the win, Spain holds World Cup titles for both the men's and women's national teams — a first.

    Here are the moments that stood out to NPR's team of journalists who covered the tournament:

    All the drama before the tournament, and just pure enjoyment once underway

    For the most part, the 2026 World Cup was a smooth, fun and safe one.

    Sure, the mandatory hydration breaks added for all games (including those in domed stadiums with air conditioning) and a first-ever halftime show in the final were maddening for the soccer purists. But, still, the U.S., Mexico and Canada put on a great show for the world — with record viewership and attendance.

    And, wow, were people treated to some remarkable soccer games. Let's not forget the hand-wringing when the announcement was made about expanding the number of countries from 32 to 48. "The quality of play will be poor! There will be blowouts! It just won't be as fun!" And then we all saw what actually happened.
    Those World Cup debutants — or those that hadn't been in decades — were just delightful. Scotland (and their wonderful fans), anyone? People from other countries enjoying and exploring the U.S. and posting the absolute best social media videos about it. And what about African countries powering into the knockout rounds? Soccer at its best.
    — Russell Lewis

    A sold out stadium of fans watch as players play in the final round of the World Cup 2026.
    During the World Cup round of 32 match between the United States and Bosnia-Herzegovina, fans of the U.S. roared and cheered throughout in Santa Clara, Calif. The Americans won 2-0 on July 1 to advance to the round of 16 against Belgium.
    (
    Charlotte Wilson
    /
    Getty Images
    )

    The enthusiasm for the U.S. team is hopefully the start of something

    I've been to a lot of sporting events, but I'm not sure I've heard a crowd pop like in Seattle when forward Folarin Balogun forced an own goal when the U.S. faced Australia, or like in Santa Clara, Calif., when midfielder Malik Tillman hit the free kick to put the U.S. up 2-0 despite being shorthanded after the Balogun red card.

    It's been a joy to see children all over the country, from L.A. to Kansas City to Atlanta to New York, wearing the team's red-and-white striped jerseys. I had friends and family who never normally watch the sport text me during the U.S. games.

    Look, I'm not naive. The U.S. still has a long way to go to match the passion of, say, Argentina when it comes to our national soccer teams. But compared to the tiny crowds at other friendlies I've attended, or getting outnumbered by Mexico fans in the Gold Cup final in Houston, this was a great start.

    And I'm hopeful that come the next CONCACAF Nations League, which begins this fall, or even the possible Copa América that might be on deck here in the States in 2028, the passion will linger long enough that this story might change.
    — Becky Sullivan

    The Cape Verde-Argentina game

    Cape Verde was an exciting team to watch in this tournament. The narrative was that they came out of nowhere, which is not quite true: yes, this was their first time qualifying for a World Cup, but in African tournaments, Cape Verde has been playing amazing soccer for years.
    As someone who follows soccer closely, I think African soccer is having a moment, and we may see it come to full bloom in the 2030 World Cup (hosted in part by Morocco). Vozinha, Cape Verde's extraordinary goalie, was one of the breakout stars of this cup at age 40.

    On the other hand, Argentina is a relentless team; they were the defending champions. They have Lionel Messi, a living legend. The game, played in Miami, was a nail-biter: until the last moment, no one knew how it would end.

    The fans were wild (there was a moment in the press box when the stadium was shaking so hard, a local journalist turned to me and said, "It never shakes like this." I will never forget that game.
    — Jasmine Garsd

    A soccer player is pictured from behind wearing a blue and white striped jersey.
    Argentina's forward Lionel Messi reacts during the 2026 World Cup final loss against Spain. This is likely Messi's final World Cup game.
    (
    Patricia de Melo Moreira
    /
    AFP via Getty Images
    )

    The Argentina team working to decrease cardiac health globally

    As someone who has followed the Argentina team for decades, this is nothing new: It is a team notorious for being slow starters, as if they needed to be up against the wall to find their motivation.

    They started off the last World Cup, in 2022, with a shocking loss to Saudi Arabia, and then, just as everyone had discounted them, they went on to win the entire tournament.

    The matches in this year's World Cup followed a similar pattern: Like against Cape Verde, Argentina seeming to be on standby during the first half, then coming to life in the second.

    Another example was Argentina-England, and yet another heart attack special. Argentina seemed to be getting its bearings in the first half of the game. It wasn't until after the 55th minute, when England scored a goal, that Argentina began to awaken and put up a fight. They equalized in the 85th minute, and then scored again in stoppage time to win and advance to the final.

    Argentina played the same way in the final, but unlike the previous games, could not find a way to bounce back.

    — Jasmine Garsd

    Unfortunately, the high ticket prices were justified

    From the moment FIFA released the first tickets, our eyes collectively popped at the price of the tickets — what a cash grab! Hundreds of dollars for the seemingly low-demand group stage games, $1,000 or more for each U.S. game, and thousands for Sunday's final.

    But the fears of half-empty stadiums, of empty hotels, or visitors turned off by the high prices, never quite came to fruition. I'm sad to report it turns out FIFA was onto something. It turns out the World Cup is very fun and very cool, and many people are willing to pay those prices, whether diehard fans traveling from overseas or curious locals who wanted the experience.

    Soccer has long hung its hat on being the most accessible sport to play — all you need is a ball! — but a $10,000 entry price to the final, and hundreds for the cheapest games, are the latest proof that's changing.

    — Becky Sullivan

    A soccer player wearing a dark blue jersey runs on a soccer field holding up his right hand. Behind him is another player wearing a yellow jersey.
    France's forward Kylian Mbappé celebrates scoring a goal against Sweden in a round of 32 match. Mbappé finished the tournament as the Golden Boot winner with 10 goals, increasing his overall World Cup total to 22, the most all-time.
    (
    Angela Weiss
    /
    AFP via Getty Images
    )

    Kylian Mbappé's unbelievable speed

    It's one thing to watch him play on TV, but when you see him in person, you really understand just how fast French captain Kylian Mbappé is.

    I did a little digging after the France-Morocco game near Boston, and found that Mbappé's fastest recorded sprint on a pitch was faster than Jamaican Olympic gold medalist Usain Bolt's average set in his 100m World Record in 2009.

    Mbappé's speed was 23.6 miles per hour, recorded in a 2019 match between Paris Saint-Germain and AS Monaco. And that speed helped him win yet another Golden Boot award. His 10 goals were the most in the tournament, increasing his overall World Cup total to 22, the most all-time.

    — Jasmine Garsd

    The much-hated VAR

    VAR, or video assistant referee, was first introduced at the World Cup in 2018. At the time, fans and teams appreciated it as a way to correct the occasional referee error or missed call. Fast-forward to 2026, and VAR is ubiquitous in almost every game.
    At times, the decisions have been accused of being ludicrous: a Colombian goal against Portugal annulled because a toenail was found offside by the VAR.
    An Iranian goal against Belgium was wiped away because the striker's butt was offside. There have also been controversial VAR calls, like the questionable foul that led to an Egyptian goal against Argentina being annulled. Argentina won that game and Egypt got knocked out.

    Fans also say it's slowing down the game and putting a damper on goal celebrations, lest the great VAR take the moment away.

    — Jasmine Garsd

    The continued politicizing of the Cup

    It's nothing new: The 2018 Russia World Cup was rife with accusations of sportswashing of human rights abuses and FIFA corruption. The 2022 Qatar World Cup faced similar criticism.

    During this World Cup, there were critiques of the U.S. government's immigration policy as tens of thousands of foreign tourists tried to enter the country. The U.S.-led war against Iran trickled onto the soccer field, too.

    Iran's soccer team had planned to base its training camp in Arizona. But it moved to Tijuana, Mexico, amid security fears and other worries. Then, the U.S. government only allowed Iran's team to enter the country a single day (and, later, two days) before each game, and the team had to depart immediately afterward.

    And, of course, the prohibitive cost of tickets, and President Trump's involvement in the tournament. He only attended one game, the final between Argentina and Spain, and was booed. There were also conversations about various teams and their colonial histories.

    — Jasmine Garsd

    A group of me wearing dark suits walk across a soccer field.
    FIFA President Gianni Infantino (L) and President Donald Trump arrive for the final ceremony after the 2026 World Cup final won by Spain over Argentina in East Rutherford, N.J. on July 19, 2026.
    (
    Odd Andersen
    /
    AFP via Getty Images
    )

    Trump's call to Infantino was an uncomfortable new frontier

    The White House's involvement with the red card given to Balogun, the U.S. striker, was an uncomfortable new frontier for U.S. national teams.

    It wasn't a surprise, exactly — President Trump has often used sports as a way to score political points. But it was extraordinary for Trump to personally call FIFA president Gianni Infantino to ask for the red card to be reviewed.

    Whether his call made a difference in FIFA's decision to allow Balogun to play — FIFA insists it did not — the optics were terrible, and for many fans, it dimmed a summer's worth of enthusiasm for the team.
    For days after Trump confirmed reports of his call to Infantino, U.S. Soccer remained silent on the president's involvement. That silence left some fans feeling as though the organization welcomed the White House's intervention.

    Then, when asked about it last week — after plenty of time had passed to issue a statement — the head of U.S. Soccer essentially shrugged.

    "The president is able to do what the president wants to do. The president is the president of the United States," U.S. Soccer CEO J.T. Batson said. "Obviously we're incredibly grateful for all the support for all of our fans all across the country, wherever they are. And we're excited about that, and we know that that'll pay dividends going forward."

    — Becky Sullivan

    Fans react to a soccer game, cheering and raising their hands in the air.
    Fans react at a bar in New York as the USA scores to make it 4-1 against Paraguay in a World Cup group match.
    (
    Adam Gray
    /
    Getty Images
    )

    The World Cup that sparkled and thrilled 

    This is the fourth World Cup that I've covered for NPR, and, unlike at the Olympics, the pride in one's country at the World Cup is always so striking.

    Fans — young and old — attend the games or show up in the host cities to be around others to cheer on their team. The passion, the fervor and just the sheer love of home.

    Seeing tens of thousands of fans in a stadium, a bar, or a watch party and watching them will their country forward believing that anything is possible on the pitch. And sometimes the fans aren't even from any of the countries playing that day.

    Soccer is a global sport and a global love. It truly is a treat to see in person.
    — Russell Lewis

    Want more fútbol in the United States? Major League Soccer has just resumed its season, and is working to capitalize on World Cup fever in the U.S.

    NWSL, the National Women's Soccer League and USL Championship are also underway. And the number-two-ranked U.S. Women's National Team is back in action this fall with a pair of tune-up matches against No. 1 Spain — ahead of next year's Women's World Cup in Brazil.
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • CA's new rules are stricter than many states
    A large neoclassical style building with a black dome and columned pediment at dawn.

    Topline:

    Gov, Gavin Newsom's return-to-office mandate has been in effect since July 1. Roughly 108,000 of California’s more than 245,900 state employees are affected by the mandate, according to the state human resources department. It’s a stance that has upset — and at times befuddled — some state workers who are calling for the governor to scrap the four-day-a-week in-office policy as they hammer out new labor agreements.

    About the return-to-office mandate: The new rule that requires state employees to work in office for four days a week also allows for some exemptions. Those include for workers who live 50 miles or farther from their worksite, or who conduct work outside the office, such as telehealth providers and inspectors. Public transportation costs for commuting are also reimbursable.

    Opposition to the new rules: Service Employees International Union Local 1000, California’s largest state worker union, represents 96,000 employees and is in contract negotiations. It argues that remote work saves taxpayers and employees money, reduces traffic and lowers emissions — all without affecting productivity. Many workers maintain they’re just as effective at home, which they say they proved when Newsom ordered them to work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. SEIUS filed an unfair labor practices complaint in May with the California Public Employment Relations Board. It also threw its support behind a bill that would give state agencies more authority to shape their hybrid work policies. “A blanket mandate does not work for all the jobs that our workers do,” said Anica Walls, the union’s president. “Let the departments decide.”

    In one big way, Gov. Gavin Newsom is tougher on public employee unions than his Republican counterpart in Texas: Making state workers show up in the office.

    After facing strong opposition from workers, it took Texas Gov. Greg Abbott three months to reverse his 2025 ban on remote work for state employees. But Newsom, whose return-to-office mandate has been in effect since July 1, shows no signs of backing down.

    It’s a stance that has upset — and at times befuddled — some state workers who are calling for the governor to scrap the four-day-a-week in-office policy as they hammer out new labor agreements.

    Typically, they’re allies to the Democratic governor. They helped him fight off a recall in 2021, and they encouraged their members to vote for him against his Republican opponents.

    More importantly to them, they maintain they’re just as effective at home, which they say they proved when Newsom ordered them to work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “It’s confusing to people when they think that they’ve done a great job to be told, ‘Well we don’t think it’s good enough and you should incur going back into the office,’” said D’Arcy McLeod, chairperson of the Professional Engineers in California Government’s bargaining team.

    Roughly 108,000 of California’s more than 245,900 state employees are affected by the mandate, according to the state human resources department. The others generally already are required to work at a specific location five days a week, including prison, firefighting, law enforcement, and custodial employees.

    Service Employees International Union Local 1000, California’s largest state worker union, represents 96,000 employees and is in contract negotiations. It argues that remote work saves taxpayers and employees money, reduces traffic and lowers emissions — all without affecting productivity.

    Newsom’s mandate allows exemptions on a case-by-case basis, including for those who live 50 miles or farther from their worksite, or who conduct work outside the office, such as telehealth providers and inspectors. Public transportation costs for commuting are also reimbursable.

    But that isn’t enough for SEIU, which in May filed an unfair labor practices complaint with the California Public Employment Relations Board. It also threw its support behind a bill that would give state agencies more authority to shape their hybrid work policies.

    “A blanket mandate does not work for all the jobs that our workers do,” said Anica Walls, the union’s president. “Let the departments decide.”

    California exceptionalism?

    States have taken different approaches to calling workers back to the office since the pandemic. Republican-led Nevada and Democratic-led New Mexico require state employees to be in the office five days a week, for example. Utah with a Republican governor wants them at the office twice a week.

    But Newsom’s blanket policy appears to be an outlier among other blue states with robust public employee unions: Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon and Washington state still embrace remote work in some capacity. It also differs from Texas, a Republican-led state that Newsom has contrasted with California.

    A few months after President Donald Trump began his second term and called for federal employees to return to the office, Abbott banned remote work for Texas state employees. But following a multi-agency survey that found that telework did not curb productivity and helped reduce turnover, Abbott walked back the move.

    Newsom “is a man who has talked about the importance of innovation, wrote an entire book about government adapting to technology and providing services in a more cost-effective way,” said Ted Toppin, the executive director of the engineers union.

    “It strikes me as interesting and ironic that Texas would have a more modern, flexible and efficient take on state employee telework.”

    Despite a state audit that concluded that telework could save California as much as $225 million a year, Newsom moved forward with his March 2025 executive order directing workers back into the office at least four days a week.

    In May during a state budget presentation, Newsom told reporters that he is “empathetic to change,” but that returning to the office helps build a sense of community. The governor has also contended that in-person work fosters collaboration, accountability and helps boost small businesses.

    McLeod said he’s surprised Newsom remains resolute to the mandate even after the audit found that remote work proved successful during and after the pandemic.

    “Every single Newsom appointed official that testified for the state auditor indicated that … the work that was being delivered during telework was substantially of higher quality and more efficient,” said McLeod of the engineers union.

    The CalPERS Sacramento Regional Office in downtown Sacramento on July 15, 2026. Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters

    What unions wanted from Newsom

    In some ways the rift echoes labor disputes from California’s last two governors.

    Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger came out swinging against public employees with unsuccessful ballot measures that were designed to cut their influence. He later imposed unpaid furloughs on public employees during the Great Recession.

    Then Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown battled with unions over pensions, passing a law that curbed retirement benefits and required workers to chip in more for their benefits. He had a reputation for being stingy with raises, too.

    Public employee unions were optimistic about Newsom. He offered concessions when he asked workers for temporary pay reductions during the pandemic, gave one-time bonuses to many employees and negotiated contracts that often included goodies for workers in hard-to-fill positions even if the deals didn’t please everyone.

    Then came the fight over returning to the office.

    Besides union leaders, Newsom’s steadfast commitment to in-person work has baffled Steve Maviglio, a Democratic political consultant who has worked with public employee unions on pension issues. For Newsom, a Democratic politician who is likely eyeing a bid for the presidency, “it’s political malpractice to come across as anti-labor,” said Maviglio.

    “The only thing you’ll be able to say is that ‘I stood up to state workers,’ which isn’t particularly helpful in a Democratic primary where labor is the key constituency nationwide for Democrats.”

    But for Will Swaim, chief executive of the libertarian think tank California Policy Center, Newsom’s fight with the unions signals something larger than remote work. Rather, it is a “policy disagreement that has turned into a foundational challenge to democracy,” said Swaim.

    SEIU 1000 has donated at least $2 million to current members of the Legislature, according to the CalMatters Digital Democracy database. In addition to its contract, the union is pushing for more flexible telework policies through a legislative proposal currently in the state Senate.

    Through its campaign donations and labor talks, SEIU is attempting to wrest control from Newsom, a publicly elected official, over who gets to shape policies over government work, according to Swaim.

    “That’s simply undemocratic,” said Swaim. “I don’t know anybody out there who believes that in their jobs they could tell their boss, ‘I’m not coming to the office, no matter what you want.’ It just doesn’t fly.”

    But bosses should work to accommodate current employees, according to SEIU president Walls — especially if they have presumably bigger ambitions to oversee even more workers.

    “As a state employee I would have trouble voting for someone who would be the boss of federal employees when I know he hasn’t shown to be a stellar employer to state employees,” said Walls.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • So many delicious, deep-fried creations to try!
    A "Chicken Charlie's" Dr. Pepper is held up in front of a crowd of OC Fair people.
    As a Dr. Pepper lover, I knew I had to try Chicken Charlie's — not new — but strange creation: Pickle Dr. Pepper.
    Topline: The OC Fair is back in town, with plenty of new food items for people to try. How about a PB&J cheeseburger with bacon? Sounds weird, but it works!

    Why this matters: Because there's so much food, and so little belly space. The PB&J burger at the Philly Cheesesteak stand is definitely worth your time, and so is the cheesy, greasy French onion bun from the Ten Pound Bun stand. And if you love sweets, don't miss the chocolate chip croffle from Mom's Bakeshoppe: That's a croissant + a waffle covered in ice cream and whipped cream.

    Read on ... for more drool-worthy details about what's new to eat at the OC Fair.

    Picture a gigantic, greasy, fried tiramisu. Layers of cream, espresso and lady fingers are deep fried in a thick, sweet batter before being sprinkled with cocoa powder.

    This unique treat can only be found right now at the Orange County Fair.

    The fair runs through Aug. 16 and in addition to pig races, carnival rides and outdoor music, the big draw is the food — carefully curated creations that test the limits of what’s typical. This year is no different. I was there on opening day, and here’s what I tried:

    What’s new at the fair this year, and where you can find it:

    A fried treat is topped with whipped cream, icecream, chocolate chips and caramel drizzle.
    One of my favorite new items was the Croffle from Mom's Bakeshoppe. This treat was sweet and refreshing with the cold ice cream.
    (
    Joshua Letona
    /
    LAist
    )

    • The Chocolate Chip Croffle from Mom's Bakeshoppe is a must if you like sweet treats. It’s a cross between a buttery croissant and crispy waffle. Then it’s adorned with vanilla ice cream, chocolate chips, whipped cream and a caramel drizzle. This creation made its way to the States from South Korea, where it’s a beloved street food. 
    • A French onion bun is an OC Fair exclusive from Ten Pound Buns, which bills itself as the king of cheese breads. The French onion bun combines gooey melted cheese and caramelized onions on a crispy piece of bread. Everything at their stand is made to order, and the portion sizes are very shareable! 
    A cheeseburger with bacon, lettuce, tomato and peanut butter and jelly.
    I love peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, but had never taken it to this level before. Highly recommend.
    (
    Joshua Letona
    /
    LAist
    )

    • The Peanut Butter and Jelly Bacon Cheeseburger from the Philly Cheesesteak stand did not disappoint. Don’t be alarmed by this strange sweet and savory combo; the flavors balance each other out perfectly. The burger comes with crispy bacon, cheese, lettuce, tomato and pickles on top of a beef patty smothered in jelly and peanut butter.  

    What else is on the menu?

    As a born-and-raised Nebraskan, this was my first time at the OC Fair, and I felt like I needed to try some classics. So, I headed to the OG at the OC Fair, Chicken Charlie’s.

    They've been at the OC Fair for 30 years now, and are known for classics like the deep-fried Oreos and new eye-popping inventions. Some of their new concoctions this year include: A fried mangonada — which features fresh mango battered, deep fried and topped with chamoy, lime and Tajin. There's also a Shawarma fry cone, Parmesan garlic fry cone and the fried tiramisu I mentioned.

    The treats I tried ranged from $10 and $15 each, but there are some deals to be had. Chicken Charlie’s is offering a $30 anniversary meal deal that includes an entrée, fries, fried Oreos and a drink.

    “I love being at the fair,” Charlie Boghosian, creator and owner of Chicken Charlie’s, told me. “I love creating new things, because I think frying is an art.”

    Profound words from the person who created items like fried Kool-Aid, bacon-wrapped pickles and a Krispy Kreme chicken sandwich.

    More new fair creations and where you can find them at the fair this year:

    • Street Corn Baked Potato (Corn Star & Baked Potato Club)
    • Chili Mac 'n' Cheese Baked Potato (Corn Star & Baked Potato Club)
    • Street Corn Fries (Corn Star & Baked Potato Club)
    • Tot-Zilla (Corn Star & Baked Potato Club)
    • Vegetarian Broc-Star Potato with broccoli (Corn Star & Baked Potato Club)
    • Dutch Fries with black truffle mayo (Biggy's)
    • Dubai Deep-Fried Oreo (Fried Affair)
    • Porkapalooza Pizza (Enzo's Pizza)
    • Korean Corn Dogs and Cheese Sticks rolled in Takis or buldak ramen (Mustard's)
    • Chupacabra Tasti Chips (Tasti Chips)
    • Candied drinks dirty beverages (Sugar Puff Candy)
    • Gluten-free Cheese Curds (Tasti Burger)
    • Loaded Tater Kegs (Tasti Burger)
    • Pizza Bacon Bombs and Bacon-Wrapped Churro (Bacon Nation)
    • Lord of the Rings Dog (Pink's)
    • Freeze-dried candy beverages and Candy Blast gummies (Sugar Puff Candy)
    • Gooey Maple Butter Popcorn Cone (Planet Popcorn)

    The OC Fair: What you need to know before you go

    • When: The fair is open 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. Wednesdays through Sundays and 11 a.m. to midnight Fridays and Saturdays. It runs through Aug. 16.
    • Where: 88 Fair Drive, Costa Mesa
    • How much: Tickets start at $15 for adults and $9 for children, with additional costs for rides. Discounts are available for seniors and veterans.
    • More info: OCFair.com

  • Deadline looms to apply for county watchdog group
    A large building with an entrance sign that reads "Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration."
    The Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration in downtown Los Angeles, where the L.A. County Board of Supervisors meets.

    Topline:

    Members of the public have until July 26 to submit their applications for L.A. County’s first Ethics Commission.

    Why it matters: The commission is meant to serve as a watchdog over local government. Commissioners will be tasked with overseeing and enforcing laws related to campaign finance, lobbying, conflicts of interest and other related issues.

    The details: Through a multilingual ad campaign, the county is seeking residents who reflect its diverse communities. The commission will have seven members who will meet at least six times a year. Members will spend about 5 to 20 hours a month on commission-related work. They are also expected to receive $250 for each meeting they participate in, along with reimbursement for any expenses they incur while performing their official duties.

    The backstory: In 2024, L.A. County voters approved Measure G, which required the creation of an independent Ethics Commission “to increase restrictions on lobbying and investigate misconduct.” The measure came amid a series of corruption cases at L.A. City Hall, but calls for reform spilled over into county government. In May 2026, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to establish the Commission.

    Where can I submit my application? L.A. County residents must apply online.

    Go deeper: Supervisors vote to create LA County's first ethics commission