Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Jurado talks housing issues, public safety, more
    A woman with medium-light skin tone and short dark hair wearing a lavender blazer and a beige and maroon scarf places an "I Voted" sticker on her blazer while smiling and looking towards left of frame.
    Yasabel Jurado places an "I Voted" sticker on her blazer after voting at the Arroyo Seco Regional Library in Los Angeles, California on Nov. 5, 2024.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles City Council District 14 will soon have a new representative in Ysabel Jurado. LAist's "Morning Edition" talks with Jurado about her top priorities — tackling the homelessness crisis, guaranteed housing for all, and public safety.

    Why it matters: She defeated incumbent Kevin DeLeon earlier this month after a tense race, scooping up 57% of the vote, in the district that includes parts of Boyle Heights, Highland Park and downtown L.A.

    Why now: Jurado will join the incoming City Council on Dec. 9.

    Listen 15:42
    Jurado pledges to stop 'eviction to homelessness pipeline,' and says LA can't police it's way out of problems

    Los Angeles City Council District 14 will soon have a new representative in Ysabel Jurado.

    She defeated incumbent Kevin de León earlier this month after a tense race, scooping up 57% of the vote in the district that includes parts of Boyle Heights, Highland Park and downtown L.A.

    Jurado — a tenant rights attorney, daughter of undocumented Filipino immigrants, and single mother — spoke with LAist's Morning Edition host Austin Cross about her top priorities as the newly-elected councilmember. This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

    Housing issues in CD14

    LAist: Let's talk about housing because your background as a tenant, your background as a tenant rights attorney gives you a unique perspective. What are the most urgent housing issues that you're seeing in your district right now?

    Jurado: We have to stop the eviction to homelessness pipeline, strengthen our renter protections, actually fund the departments that can enforce it to make sure that folks like our seniors can stay in the housing that they've stayed in for the majority of their lives.

    That is a huge issue for us. So making sure that renters have a place to stay, using the ULA funds that we all voted for to make sure that seniors can still stay in these low income affordable units for the duration of their livelihood, right? Making sure that folks can age well in the neighborhoods in which they're choosing.

    And when it comes to homelessness, this district is home to Skid Row and we haven't had a City Council leader that's been able to corral all of the agencies, non profits, mutual aid groups that are coordinating in that area. And so wanting to work hand in glove with Supervisor Hilda Solis to really attack Skid Row's homelessness problem and try out new things.

    They may not always work out, but we can't keep doing the same things and expecting different results.

    Public land for more housing

    LAist: In the past, you've pointed to Hilda Solis' Care First Village as an effective, more affordable model for housing. You've also spoken about community land trusts. That was a part of your housing platform. What kind of housing solutions will you prioritize? What do you think is going to bring the most change the most quickly?

    Jurado: I mean, one of them is the Care First Villages, right? Supervisor Solis was able to use public lands to build transitional and interim housing for unhoused people, whether it's women, whether it's seniors, whether it's young folks who are just newly unhoused, and able to stand that up in less than six months using rehabbed shipping containers, and that's something that we can be doing in the city.

    LAUSD, the county, and the city — we have all of these unused parcels that are underutilized. We already know which ones they are, we should really start leveraging them in that same way to create more interim housing, especially in this district. Comparatively to other districts, this district has less interim housing sites, based on sheer location and numbers.

    The second thing is, yes, working with community land trusts, using the public monies we raised through ULA, in order to help give tenants a pathway to homeownership, promising them permanent affordability, making sure that's embedded in the covenant for the housing.

    Obstacles to combatting homelessness

    LAist: Just looking at some of the numbers, councilmember, L.A. city's latest point in time homeless count saw a 10.4% drop in unsheltered homelessness in the past year. We're still talking about close to 30,000 people living on the streets in L.A. city alone, about 75,000 in the county. What's not happening in your view, though? And how do we speed up the change?

    Jurado: Part of it is even just looking at the numbers of shelter beds that we have. The city controller has put out a great briefing on this and showing how we're just not meeting the demand and the need.

    CD14 is one of the districts that has the most, and I think there's a lot of discretionary funds that they could be using to tackle these crises head on and yet isn't. I think part of it has to do with priorities and failed leadership and, you know, lack of interest. And so looking at the inspiration from the Care First Village of like innovating through shipping containers, using public lands, we all have the opportunity in this district and we should really be doing that to meet the moment right now with our homeless crisis here in LA.

    "F— the police" controversy

    LAist: I want to go back to a time during the campaign. There was a moment in that campaign that made national news, and that was your response to a question about police budgets during a public forum at Cal State LA. You quoted a song by N. W. A. Would you have handled that question differently?

    Jurado: I mean, I was talking to students and I was reflecting back the sentiment of folks in this district in which, you know, they are concerned with over policing. I think, you know, if anybody knows a parent or someone that's talking to you, or even a group that maybe you're not necessarily a part of, you start from a point of reference in which . . . we'll do something that's familiar to them and then drift off to a further point.

    And at the end of the day, we were having a conversation about how neighborhoods like Boyle Heights and El Sereno, you know, they want more policing, but at the same time, they don't want to be over policed. They don't want to call the police when they're the victim and then suddenly be arrested for being the suspect, which is a reality that is far too common than we care to admit, right?

    And so, I think we can all have a conversation, a mature one at that, about public safety and also about accountability at the same time. And so, that's what we were having that day, and we can continue to have that as we continue moving forward and looking at our city and trying to figure out what's best for, you know, the constituents in CD14 and greater L.A.

    LAist: I mean, a lot of people would say, "Yeah, there's a real benefit to connecting with your audience, meeting them where they are at," — the lyrics of that song, is that your personal view of the police?

    Jurado: No. . . you know, the song is a criticism. Like when we think about the song and why it was created, it was created [in] the wake of the violence of Rodney King in an L.A. that was torn.

    That's where I grew up. That is, I grew up in Highland Park before it was cool and public safety was a real big issue for me and even one of my cousins joined a gang and got caught up in trouble and struggles with recidivism. And so I think the reality of that is still here. Part of why I ran was, you know, the racial reckoning we were promised post George Floyd, that doesn't feel like it's been reckoned with — really.

    And so I think when we look at public safety, it looks different for every community, and my constituents do want more police, and it's about public safety and police accountability. And also thinking about the bigger issues, right? What we've been doing has not been working.

    On the LAPD

    LAist: I'm sure there will be some efforts to invest in those but looking at topics such as the LAPD staffing levels, they have hit their lowest mark in more than two decades. In your view, should the size of the LAPD grow, shrink, or stay the same?

    Jurado: The department has been funded more than it's ever been before. But when we look at departments like street lighting, it's funded less than 1% and has been continued to be cut over the years, especially as we head into a financial deficit. We're looking at CD14 where downtown nearly half of all the lights are out, where every main street in this district, Eagle Rock, Highland Park, El Sereno, down the street from my house, every light has a sign that says out of service call this number, you call the number, and it goes to no one, and the reality is 70% of these lights are out because of lack of maintenance.

    Because we've underfunded a department. And so when we think about safety, I really think we should be broadening it, because we know the studies show that lighting industry cleanliness contributes to the safety of a neighborhood.

    LAist: I will say on the topic of street lights, that is a topic that we have covered extensively here. There is a task force involving the LAPD regarding those lights because some of the wiring has been removed possibly for profit by individuals. I do want to come back though to my question about LAPD and their size and their budgets. Should they grow, shrink, or stay the same?

    Jurado: At the end of the day, we have to look at what's been working and we can't keep doing the same things and expecting different results. And they have already, you know, they've been spot on. They've been paid more than they've ever been before. I don't know if you know this — in the past year, due to bad policing and the liability claims from that, the city has had to dip into 300 million of its reserves.

    That's our emergency funds and that was in the first three months of the year, 300 million. And if we continue on that rate, we are going to bankrupt the city, and next year, the city council may need to declare a fiscal emergency, and so every expense after that declaration would have to be voted by a 15-member council. . . So I think we really have to be critical about the choices that we're making in funding departments in this next year, especially with a lot of our responsibilities as council members to our constituents, but also with these global events that are coming up in our city.

    LAist: Although you did say that the people within your district, they do want police. How do you find that balance when it sounds as though they might need more police, more hiring might be necessary at this point? It sounds to me as though you aren't really in a position right now to say that you want to put more money toward the hiring of more LAPD officers.

    Jurado: When we look at our budget, how can we allocate more money that we don't have? And reimagining public safety and widening what that view means, means different things for every community.

    And so part of our first 100 days, in addition to lighting up CD14 . . .doing some deep listening and deep canvassing, which is what we intend to do in our first 100 days, to talk to all of our constituents and see what that is.

    The budget cycle is going to come again as it does every single year, but we're in a big fiscal deficit and it sounds like we're not going to have enough money to fund many things this next year.

    Street safety and reducing traffic fatalities in CD 14

    LAist: What are your plans to improve street safety? Maybe what recommendations would you make to reduce those fatalities?

    Jurado: Increasing the multi-modality of downtown is important, but even in neighborhoods like Boyle Heights, which is a neighborhood that is considered a hot spot because it's bordered by a lot of freeways, it is one of the areas where there are a lot of traffic fatalities. So looking at how we can reduce the distraction of drivers, increase the ability to have reliable, accessible transit, and make sure that we do have the cleanliness and the city services to make sure the streets are actually safe for folks and pedestrians alike.

    What gives Jurado hope about LA's future?

    LAist: My last question, you're entering office at a challenging time for the city. What gives you hope about LA's future? 

    Jurado: I always said on the campaign trail, we always find joy in the struggle. Whether we're singing at the picket line or, you know, we're going to organize a party to raise money for someone who needs legal funds.

    And I think that this group of people that have elected me have always been able to find joy and work and living in community with one another. And I think that will continue no matter who their elected is, but being elected can uplift that joy and make it easier for people to feel that has always been kind of the thing that brings me joy, right?

    And throughout this campaign that has been a through line for me, and everyone that has chipped in has always provided me with some hope that they have for CD 14. So starting a new chapter, having radical colleagues who are willing to join me in the struggle, and all the people that we are serving who still are resolving the problems on their own, creatively and without a budget all the time.

    And making sure that working class voices are heard and we'll do it alongside them.

  • Trump renews push to shift funding
    Rows of tents stretch across a dirt plot of land with porta potties in the corner.
    Rows of tents at the O Lot Safe Sleeping site in San Diego on Aug. 12, 2024. The city of San Diego opened the site in 2023 to offer temporary shelter for unhoused residents after it began implementing the Unsafe Camping Ordinance, which bans homeless encampments.

    Topline:

    The Trump administration wants to shift more money to homeless shelters that require sobriety, a change that would disrupt California’s “housing-first” policies.

    The backstory: It tried last year to move federal homelessness funds away from permanent housing and into temporary housing that requires sobriety. That move, which goes against the existing “housing first” policy favoring a no-strings-attached approach to housing, was blocked by a federal judge.

    More details: The Trump administration’s callous decision to take a second bite at dismantling one of our nation’s most important homelessness prevention programs after a federal court already blocked the administration’s first attempt shows a complete disregard for the people who depend on this funding to keep a roof over their heads,” Santa Clara County Counsel Tony LoPresti said in a news release.

    Read on... for more on the push to shift homelessness funding.

    The Trump administration is renewing its push to change the way it funds homeless shelters and housing in California and other states, and several agencies say it could disrupt their services.

    It tried last year to move federal homelessness funds away from permanent housing and into temporary housing that requires sobriety. That move, which goes against the existing “housing first” policy favoring a no-strings-attached approach to housing, was blocked by a federal judge.

    Now, the Trump administration is trying again. Once again, it’s facing pushback.

    This week, a group that includes the National Alliance to End Homelessness and Santa Clara County filed a challenge in Rhode Island’s federal court to the Trump administration’s latest funding guidelines.

    The Trump administration’s callous decision to take a second bite at dismantling one of our nation’s most important homelessness prevention programs after a federal court already blocked the administration’s first attempt shows a complete disregard for the people who depend on this funding to keep a roof over their heads,” Santa Clara County Counsel Tony LoPresti said in a news release.

    More than $4 billion in federal funding is at stake. The National Alliance to End Homelessness estimates the proposed changes could cost California nearly $238 million for permanent housing, and threaten to put nearly 15,000 Californians back on the street.

    “The ‘housing first’ experiment failed Americans by warehousing the vulnerable without results. This ideology promised to end homelessness. Instead, billions of taxpayer dollars were spent while homelessness increased to record levels,” HUD Secretary Scott Turner said in a news release earlier this month.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Sponsored message
  • Nonprofit behind it faces debt crisis
    A low angle show of three people wearing t-shirts celebrating underneath and holding a large Pride flag with palm trees in the background.
    A large Pride flag is carried through the 41st Annual Long Beach Pride Parade in Long Beach on May 19, 2024.

    Topline:

    More than a month after the abrupt cancellation of this year’s Long Beach Pride Festival, the nonprofit behind the enduring celebration remains in a financial bind. It has so far been unable to repay its vendors, ticketholders and sponsors as it awaits a decision on whether its insurer will cover its losses.

    Why it matters: That decision, according to Long Beach Pride president Tonya Martin, will factor heavily into whether they take more drastic action to cover the debt, such as selling or leasing out their headquarters.

    The backstory: The festival was canceled last month after the city of Long Beach issued a cease-and-desist letter less than an hour before its opening event, saying Pride lacked the necessary permits to start.

    Read on... for more on the organization and festival.

    More than a month after the abrupt cancellation of this year’s Long Beach Pride Festival, the nonprofit behind the enduring celebration remains in a financial bind. It has so far been unable to repay its vendors, ticketholders and sponsors as it awaits a decision on whether its insurer will cover its losses.

    That decision, according to Long Beach Pride President Tonya Martin, will factor heavily into whether they take more drastic action to cover the debt, such as selling or leasing out their headquarters.

    “We do want to keep the building,” Martin said. “But if we have to sell it, we have to sell it, because right now all we can think about is how we’re going to pay back all the vendors and the rest of the ticketholders.”

    According to the organization’s treasurer, Wayne Manous, Long Beach Pride filed a claim with its carrier, the Nonprofits Insurance Alliance of California, a few days after the festival was canceled on May 15. They expect a determination in the next week, Martin said.

    “Once we receive the determination and award, we can begin refunding payments to our festival vendors which encompasses Information Booths, Seller Booths, Food Booths, Food Trucks, and others awaiting a refund,” Manous wrote in a June 10 email to vendors seeking refunds.

    In an emailed statement Tuesday, the organization declined to offer the total amount it owes or elaborate more on its insurance claim, saying it will wait until “those processes are fully resolved.”

    The festival was canceled last month after the city of Long Beach issued a cease-and-desist letter less than an hour before its opening event, saying Pride lacked the necessary permits to start.

    Many vendors and ticketholders — some who flew in or drove from other parts of the country — say they were in transit or had already arrived at the festival grounds when they were given notice of the cancellation, either from the city or from friends on social media.

    Erica Loring, who owns Shecanter, an online retailer of feminist and queer products, said she was driving up from San Diego the morning of the event when a friend texted her the news.

    “I was very confused,” Loring said. “I had to try and figure out what the heck that meant, what it means for vendors, if we’ve gotten any emails to notify us. ‘Do we still go up there?’”

    Kaitlyn Nguyen with Heritage 1857, a Vietnamese-style coffee brand, said she received notice not from Pride but from the city’s Health Department, telling her she no longer had permission to sell her goods there.

    By that point, she said, her festival crew had already driven into town from Texas and set up a tent and driven an hour outside of town. When she tried to call Long Beach Pride’s general line to get more information, it was disconnected.

    Nguyen said she spent around $2,500 on gas, fees, product, permitting and everything else she needed to participate. Now she’s uncertain how much, if any, she will recover. “With the communication that it is at right now, it’s just hard to tell, but I do hope that we get that amount back,” she said.

    In the days following the festival’s cancellation, the city and Pride traded blame, offering dueling timelines over what caused it. Long Beach Pride argued it submitted documents and worked with the city in good faith through the final hours and was taken off guard by the city’s order to clear out.

    Martin said she was stunned when officers delivered the cease-and-desist to the festival grounds. “You have two days to get everything off the site, or you’ll be arrested,” she recalled being told. “I was in shock, just floored. I was just weak at the knees.”

    A woman with light skin tone, light blonde hair, wearing a graphic t-shirt, looks out of frame as she stands next to a man with light skin tone, glasses, short hair and a mustache, who is slightly out of focus in the foreground.
    Tonya Martin, with an original Pride founder, Bob Crow, talks about Long Beach Pride in Long Beach, Monday, June 26, 2023.
    (
    Thomas R. Cordova
    /
    Long Beach Post
    )

    The city fired back in a 23-page memo, saying the nonprofit repeatedly failed to provide permitting materials and structural plans for stages, electrical systems and security. As the situation worsened, city officials offered to move guests into the Terrace Theater and open Bixby Park for a smaller event on Sunday, without alcohol sales or fenced festival grounds.

    Pride declined both options, later saying the theater was too costly — more than $100,000, they said — while Bixby Park did not allow enough time to satisfy performers’ contractual requirements.

    City spokesperson Laath Martin said Tuesday that Long Beach’s business licensing team has been offering refunds to vendors for city fees. But in the month since the event, vendors say they’ve heard little to no word from Pride itself on when or if they will be repaid for other expenses and fees.

    Even before this year’s shock cancellation, the festival, established in 1983, had been struggling.

    According to tax filings, Pride lost more than $1.8 million between 2022 and 2024 — $819,066 in 2022, $716,729 in 2023 and $306,000 in 2024. The organization has not turned a profit since 2019.

    When Martin took over as president in 2023, she said she unknowingly inherited an organization already carrying $2.6 million in outstanding debt. A year after Martin took the helm, the nonprofit relinquished control of its long-running Pride parade. The city took over planning and funding for the signature event while Pride attempted to keep running the corresponding festival.

    A crowd of people celebrate along a street wearing colorful shirts and holding flags.
    The crowds gather along Ocean Boulevard for the 41st Annual Long Beach Pride Parade in Long Beach, Sunday, May 19, 2024.
    (
    Thomas R. Cordova
    /
    Long Beach Post
    )

    The festival’s budget this year was $500,000, and Pride had raised less than $100,000 of it by the time the event was canceled, with only 331 tickets sold as of late April, according to Q Voice News. Pride declined to confirm the number of tickets sold or provide any detailed financial information to the Long Beach Post.

    Corporate sponsorships, once a reliable source of major revenue, had largely evaporated, Martin said, naming Walmart and Coca-Cola as examples of large companies that have quietly pulled back as the Trump administration has coerced firms to forgo LGBTQ+ and diversity initiatives.

    “They don’t want to upset the president,” Martin said. “Nobody will come out and say it, which I wish they would.”

    Normally, Martin said, Pride hires an outside operator to put on the festival, which can run upwards of $400,000. But under financial pressure, she and the board voted to avoid the expense and handle the festival setup themselves. As Martin has repeatedly emphasized since the cancellation, they are all part-time volunteers.

    This year’s event was shaping up to be small, according to Loring; only 13 retail or merchandise vendors were listed to participate. “Smaller than a tiny farmer’s market,” Loring said. Another 10 or so food vendors were signed up, Nguyen said, about half of what she’d expect at a festival this size.

    “I was like, OK, was the application process a deterrent, or have bridges already been burned, and these businesses have learned not to come to Long Beach due to prior experience?” Nguyen said.

    In a letter over the weekend, Pride said it wants to bring the festival back in 2027 under new leadership, with lessons learned and, it hopes, a more stable financial footing.

    The board also said that Martin would step down from the presidency in August, a transition the organization said had been planned before the cancellation. Martin confirmed her exit on Monday, saying she will step away from the role and intends to help whoever succeeds her get up to speed. She said she also plans to hold a debrief with Mayor Rex Richardson to discuss what went wrong.

    The organization is also working with the city to hold a free Teen Pride event in September.

    “I don’t think Pride will ever go away, no matter what they do, even if we change the whole scope of the event itself,” Martin said. “It will never go away. It’ll always be there.”

    But Loring, who made her vendor debut in Long Beach, said she would not return if the event is run by the same people.

    She was shocked when Pride asked in a June 10 email if vendors and ticketholders would consider donating back a portion of their refunds to the organization. “The audacity for that was on another level,” Loring said.

    “It seems as though the entire Pride organization needs an overhaul,” she said. “It needs a fresh set of eyes, a fresh set of experience in order for the community to move forward faithfully.”

  • Weekend pop-up celebrates two L.A. originals
    A hand holding a Kogi Korean BBQ sauce in front of Sam Woo BBQ.
    Kogi x Sam Woo collab is happening this weekend.

    Topline:

    Two icons of Los Angeles are coming together in Alhambra for a food pop-up this weekend — each has carved a unique place in Asian America.

    Why now: On one end you have Kogi, bringing its Korean-Mexican fusion kimchi taco and blackjack quesadilla — and its food truck — to the collab. On the other is Sam Woo, old-school purveyor of Cantonese taste lending its char siu and roast duck from its OG location on Valley between 5th and 6th.

    Why it matters: Together, they represent two generations of immigrant entrepreneurship that reshaped how L.A. eats.

    Read on ... for details and the stories of immigrant entrepreneurship the two restaurants embody ...

    Two icons of Los Angeles are coming together in Alhambra for a food pop-up this weekend — each has carved a unique place in Asian America.

    On one end you have Kogi, bringing its Korean-Mexican fusion kimchi taco and blackjack quesadilla — and its food truck — to the collab. On the other is Sam Woo, old-school purveyor of Cantonese taste lending its char siu and roast duck from its OG location on Valley between 5th and 6th.

    Together, they represent two generations of immigrant entrepreneurship that reshaped how L.A. eats.

    Kogi x Sam Woo
    Where: Sam Woo BBQ, 514 Valley Blvd., Alhambra
    When: Saturday, 11 a.m.-3 p.m. | Sunday, 4-8 p.m.

    “The best way to do it would be to come together like Voltron, but be ourselves separately,” said Roy Choi, chef and founder of Kogi BBQ. “So don't do anything to your roast duck. Don't do anything to your char siu. Don't do anything to our blackjack quesadilla. Don't do anything to our taco.”

    The mash-up features two items – roast duck kimchi taco, and char siu blackjack quesadilla. The best-of-both-worlds concept extends to where the food will be served.

    “ My whole vision was for Kogi truck to be parked in front,” said Karen Cheung, daughter of Sam Woo’s original owner.

    A flyer advertising for a pop-up collaboration between Kogi BBQ and Sam Woo BBQ
    Kogi x Sam Woo
    (
    Courtesy Kogi and Sam Woo
    )

    From Chinatown to everywhere

    Restaurants come and go, but Sam Woo has remained the byword for Cantonese barbeque in Los Angeles and beyond for more than four decades.

    On Christmas Day 1979, new immigrant Peter Cheung opened a stand serving take-out roast duck, char siu and the likes in Chinatown, bringing the family craft from Hong Kong to L.A.

    “At the time, it was just my dad, my brother, and me,” Cheung, 67, said in Cantonese. “We hired a cashier and a meat cutter, that was about it.”

    Cheung also brought over the Chinese name from the family business back home. It means “three harmonies” – among earth, heaven, and man. The English name Sam Woo was chosen because it sounded like the Cantonese words.

    A restaurant named Sam Woo BBQ on a street.
    Sam Woo in Alhambra.
    (
    Fiona Ng
    /
    LAist
    )

    In the late 1970s, his clientele was mainly Chinese and Vietnamese immigrants in the then-bustling enclave, with a small handful of customers coming in from Monterey Park.

    Back then, he said, “All the restaurants were concentrated in Chinatown.”

    As the Chinese-speaking diaspora expanded to the San Gabriel Valley, so too did Sam Woo. Cheung opened a Monterey Park location in 1981 (now closed) and the Alhambra outpost on Valley Boulevard in 1983.

    Today, Cheung and his family own and operate four locations across the L.A. region — the oldest in Alhambra.

    That little storefront served a loyal legion of eaters, including my family, who moved to Alhambra in the early 1990s — and a kid named Roy Choi.

    An Asian man with medium-tone skin hands food down to a customer at a food truck.
    Roy Choi, left, hands out food from his Kogi BBQ truck in Maywood in January 2024.
    (
    Allen J. Schaben
    /
    Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
    )

    When Roy met Sam

    Choi was hanging out in Alhambra and nearby 626 cities during high school and into college, at all-night Asian cafes and their parking lots where a subculture centered around modified Japanese cars took root.

    “It was the cafes and the barbecue spots back in Alhambra that were early on in having a kind of a meeting ground for young Asian youth,” Choi said. “It might have been the birth of the AZN movement, you know what I'm saying?”

    One place he always ate at was Sam Woo.

    A rectangular sign outdoors reads "Valley Plaza" with Chinese characters underneath. Then another rectangular sign below it is divided into 12 smaller rectangular signs each with Chinese character & English names for various businesses in the strip mall.
    Strip mall signs in San Gabriel point to a majority Asian population in this part of Los Angeles.
    (
    Samanta Helou Hernandez
    /
    LAist
    )

    “One of the top five things to eat for me is roast duck or roast pork over rice with the sauce that drips down into it,” he said. “That's where I started really eating barbecue  — and this is before I was a chef.”

    Forty-three years since it opened, the hole-in-the-wall in Alhambra has not been changed — inside or out. Karen remembers hanging out at the shop with her sisters growing up, filling small containers of sauces while their parents ran the operation.

    “ When you walk into Alhambra, you feel like you are going back in time,” Karen said. “That's what people remember Sam Woo as, like the Mahjong clock, or the vintage menu that you do not ever see anymore. That's people's memories.”

    How the collab fell into place

    Choi wrote about eating at Sam Woo among other culinary adventures in L.A. earlier this year for the Financial Times.

    Karen, one of Peter’s four children, read the story – and fired off a DM.

    “I was like, ‘We're so honored. Out of all the restaurants you could talk about, you mentioned Sam Woo,” Karen said. “‘Let's do a collab.’”

    Six months of planning later, with hundreds of pounds of char siu ready to be cooked, the crossover is happening.

    “The inspiration is how delicious their food is [and] the longevity of their restaurant,” Choi said, whose Kogi has redefined fusion cooking and the food truck experience for 19 years and counting.

    “We wanna bring something really special to Alhambra," he said. "Just a moment that you could say, ‘I was there.’”

  • Olivia Rodrigo to bring mega music festival to OC
    Olivia Rodrigo performing on stage wearing sparkly shorts and a white tank top.
    The Daisy Chain Fields music festival, founded by Olivia Rodrigo, will debut at Irvine's Great Park in August.

    Topline:

    Fans will now have to join a waitlist for tickets to the largest music festival to hit the Great Park in Irvine after presale windows opened at 10 a.m. on Wednesday. The Daisy Chain Fields music festival, founded by Olivia Rodrigo, will feature Chappell Roan, Stevie Nicks and more.

    What you need to know: It will be held on Aug. 29 and is expected to draw 45,000 guests. Tickets range from $255 to $1,255. Organizers said that the waitlist is now open and that fans will have a chance for tickets if they're made available.

    Getting there: Parking passes will cost $95. Shuttles to the festival will also be available from UC Irvine and the Honda Center for $50 per person. Those tickets must be purchased in advance because seats are limited.

    Who is playing? An all-woman setlist includes Bikini Kill, Die Spitz, Doechii, Eli, Garbage, KATSEYE, Mitski, Not For Radio, Quiet Light, Rachel Chinourir, Santigold, and The Breeders, all across two stages. Special guests include Karen O, Sarah McLachlan and Stevie Nicks.

    What else is there? All proceeds from the festival will go to 10 nonprofit partners, including the Black Mamas Matter Alliance, the Center for Reproductive Rights, the Johns Hopkins Center for Indigenous Health and Planned Parenthood.

    Officials say: Irvine Mayor Larry Agran said in a statement, “This summer has been nothing short of exceptional, with the U.S. Men’s National Team making the Great Park its home base while competing in the 2026 World Cup, and now Daisy Chain Fields bringing a modern-day celebration of women in music, creativity, and community to Irvine.”