Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Will new state law changes bring help or harm?
    A man and woman strain to touch each other but are separated by an amorphous, see-through barrier in this illustration.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles is one of several counties in the state that delayed implementation of a new law that would open up treatment to more people living with serious mental illness and substance use issues. Once the law is implemented, will it pave the way for counties to provide consistent, “last resort” care or will it strip people of their individual rights?

    Why now: Last month, the Board of Supervisors voted to postpone enacting the law, noting that the county was not yet ready to provide the facilities and services to make it work. But some mental health advocates and family members of people struggling with mental illness argue that waiting years to move forward with the new law would continue to keep those who are sickest out of lifesaving treatment.

    The reaction: “Our health care facilities are not prepared for the magnitude of what this response could look like,” Board Chair Lindsey Horvath said last month.

    “We can’t accept the status quo any longer,” said Teresa Pasquini, a longtime mental health advocate whose son lives with a serious mental illness. “It’s killing our loved ones.”

    What's next: The Board of Supervisors delayed implementation of SB 43 until January 2026.

    Los Angeles is one of several counties in the state that delayed implementation of a new law that would open up treatment to more people living with serious mental illness and substance use issues.

    Last month, the Board of Supervisors voted to postpone enacting the law, noting that the county was not yet ready to provide the facilities and services to make it work.

    “Our health care facilities are not prepared for the magnitude of what this response could look like,” Board Chair Lindsey Horvath said before the vote to delay until January 2026.

    But some mental health advocates and family members of people struggling with mental illness argue that waiting years to move forward with the new law would continue to keep those who are sickest out of lifesaving treatment.

    “We can’t accept the status quo any longer,” said Teresa Pasquini, a longtime mental health advocate whose son lives with a serious mental illness.

    “It’s killing our loved ones.”

    The delay highlights the ongoing debate about what the new law, when in effect, will likely accomplish. Will it pave the way for counties to provide consistent, “last resort” behavioral health care for people who can’t provide it on their own? Or will it strip people of their individual rights, leading to people being warehoused under the guise of treatment?

    What the new law does

    Senate Bill 43, which was signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in October, changed state law to allow people living with a serious mental illness or severe substance use disorder — who are also unable to provide for their personal safety or medical care — to be deemed “gravely disabled” and held against their will.

    According to Newsom’s office, SB 43 provided the first significant changes to existing conservatorship law in 50 years by broadening who is eligible, updating situations for which conservatorship can be considered and creating “the first-ever meaningful transparency” into data on conservatorships.

    “The mental health crisis affects us all, and people who need the most help have been too often overlooked,” the governor said in a news release. “We are working to ensure no one falls through the cracks, and that people get the help they need and the respect they deserve.”

    The bill gave counties the option of implementing the law at the start of this year or waiting until 2026. A majority of the counties opted to wait.

    That choice is distressing to many families dealing with severe mental illness and who have seen their loved ones cycle from treatment facilities they say are inadequate to the streets and, in some cases, jail.

    Mark Gale, criminal justice chair for the National Alliance on Mental Illness of Greater L.A. County said families of loved ones living with serious mental illness have been waiting too long for changes to the law that they believe will open up more options for care. He said advocates like himself are “exhausted” and “disappointed” at counties’ decision to delay.

    “Some people with mental illness are gonna continue to make catastrophic decisions for themselves until they’re found dead… ,” Gale said. “I’m not waiting for that.”

    Opponents fear return to 'warehousing'

    Others see SB 43 not as a way forward, but means of reverting to the past, when people living with mental illness were too often warehoused in inhumane conditions across the country.

    They worry that the new law will ultimately lead to more locked facilities that will provide a prison-like setting rather than a therapeutic one.

    Vanessa Ramos of Disability Rights California has been diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder and substance use issues. She has been sober for nearly 12 years. She told LAist she is concerned that under SB 43, California will be on a path to creating more locked facilities that are easier to enter than they are to exit.

    “SB43 has the ingredients to banish poor, non-white and white and, for sure, disabled people for the lack of community-based mental health and harm reduction services that people need,” Ramos said.

    Of particular concern for Ramos are people living with severe substance-use issues. The new law allows them to be placed on an involuntary hold and make them possibly eligible for conservatorship if they are unable to provide for their personal safety or necessary medical care.

    Gary Tsai, director of Substance Abuse Prevention and Control at the county Department of Health, pointed out last month that right now there is no involuntary care model for people living with substance use issues. Tsai told the Board of Supervisors that infrastructure would need to be built out in order for the county to provide appropriate care under the new law.

    But even if that infrastructure were available, some local health advocates still don’t think it’s a good idea.

    Carolina Valle, senior policy director for the California Pan-Ethnic Health Network, said Angelenos already have enough information from history to be suspicious of locking people up with substance use disorders.

    “It’s called the War on Drugs,” Valle said. “We had models of involuntary substance use treatment, it was called jails and prisons and we continue to have those today.”

    Valle said she’d like to see SB 43 not only delayed, but repealed.

    Newsom wants more urgency

    Newsom has said that he’s not happy with counties that have chosen to postpone SB 43 implementation.

    “We cannot wait until 2026... on the conservatorship reform,” Newsom told reporters during a virtual news conference last month. “People literally will lose their lives. And people are losing confidence and trust in government.”

    Newsom’s demands for urgency on the part of counties comes just as the most populous areas of the state launch CARE Court, a new program he championed that aims to get more people living with serious mental illness into treatment.

    And the governor wants voters to agree to open up new funding to pay for the mental health care and housing infrastructure needed to make all of these legislative moves successful.

    Earlier this month, Newsom was joined in L.A. by Mayor Karen Bass and others to drum up support for Proposition 1, the measure on the ballot in March which his office says would raise more than $6 billion for mental health treatment facilities and housing.

  • Students mistrust results and fear job impact
    A close-up of a hand on a laptop computer.
    A student takes notes during history class.

    Topline:

    Nearly every student in the California State University system has used artificial intelligence tools, but most don’t trust the results, are worried about how AI will affect their future job security and want more say in systemwide AI policy.

    CSU AI survey: CSU polled more than 94,000 students, faculty and staff, making it the largest survey of AI perception in higher education. Nearly all students have used AI but most question whether it is trustworthy. Both faculty and students want more say in systemwide AI policies. Faculty are divided about the impact of AI on teaching and research. 

    The results: Educators want a say in how and which AI tools are used. Students across the CSU system want to be included in those discussions. Some professors teach students how to use AI and encourage students to use it, while others forbid its use in the classroom. In addition to clarity around use of AI policies, students in this year’s survey said they want training that will be relevant to their careers. “I want to learn AI tools that are actually used in my industry, not just generic chatbots,” a mechanical engineering student responded. “Show me what engineers are actually doing with AI on the job.”

    Nearly every student in the California State University system has used artificial intelligence tools, but most don’t trust the results, are worried about how AI will affect their future job security and want more say in systemwide AI policy.

    That’s according to results of a 2025 survey of more than 80,000 students enrolled at CSU’s 22 campuses, plus faculty and staff — the largest and most comprehensive study of how higher education students and instructors perceive artificial intelligence.

    Nationwide, university faculty struggle to reconcile the learning benefits of AI — hailed as a “transformative tool” for providing tutoring and personalized support to students — and the risks that students will depend on AI agents to do their thinking for them and, very possibly, get the wrong information. Educators want a say in how and which AI tools are used. Students across the CSU system want to be included in those discussions.

    Some professors teach students how to use AI and encourage students to use it, while others forbid its use in the classroom, said Katie Karroum, vice president of systemwide affairs for the Cal State Student Association, representing more than 470,000 students.

    “Both of these things are allowed to coexist right now without a policy,” she said.

    Karroum said that faculty practices are too varied and that what students need are consistent and transparent rules developed in collaboration with students. “There are going to be students who are graduating with AI literacy and some that graduate without AI literacy.”

    In February 2025, the CSU system announced an initiative to adopt AI technologies and an agreement with OpenAI to make ChatGPT available throughout the system. The system-wide survey released Wednesday confirms that ChatGPT is the most used AI tool across CSUs. The system will also work with Adobe, Google, IBM, Intel, LinkedIn, Microsoft and NVIDIA.

    Campus leaders say the survey and accompanying dashboard provide much needed data on how the system continues to integrate AI into instruction and assessment.

    “We need to have data to make data-informed decisions instead of just going by anecdote,” said Elisa Sobo, a professor of anthropology at San Diego State who was involved in interpreting the survey’s findings. “We have data that show high use, but we also have high levels of concern, very valid concern, to help people be responsible when they use it.”

    Faculty at San Diego State designed the survey, which received more than 94,000 responses from students, faculty and staff. Among all responding CSU students, 95% reported using an AI tool; 84% said they used ChatGPT and 82% worry that AI will negatively impact their future job security. Others worry that they won’t be competitive if they don’t understand AI well enough.

    “Even though I don’t want to use it, I HAVE TO!” wrote a computer science major. “Because if I don’t, then I’ll be left behind, and that is the last thing someone would want in this stupid job market.”

    Faculty are divided about the impact of AI on teaching and research. Just over 55% reported a positive benefit, while 52% said AI has had a negative impact so far.

    San Diego State conducted its first campuswide survey in 2023 in response to complaints from students about inconsistent rules about AI use in courses, said James Frazee, vice president for information technology at the campus.

    “Students are facing this patchwork of expectations even within the same course taught by different instructors,” Frazee said. In one introductory course, the professor might encourage students to use AI, but another professor teaching the same course might forbid it, he said. “It was a hot mess.”

    In that 2023 survey, one student made this request: “Please just tell us what to do and be clear about it.”

    Following that survey, the San Diego State Academic Senate approved guidelines for the use of generative AI in instruction and assessments. In 2025, the Senate made it mandatory that faculty include language about AI use in course syllabi.

    “It doesn’t say what your disposition has to be, whether it’s pro or con,” Frazee said. “It just says you have to be clear about your expectations. Without the 2023 survey data, that never would have happened.”

    According to the 2025 systemwide survey, only 68% of teaching faculty include language about AI use in their syllabi.

    Sobo and other faculty who helped develop the 2025 survey hope other CSU campuses will find the data helpful in informing policies about AI use. The dashboard allows users to search for specific campus and discipline data and view student responses by demographic group.

    The 2025 survey shows that first-generation students are more interested in formal AI training and that Black, Hispanic and Latino students are more interested than white students. At San Diego State, students are required to earn a micro-credential in AI use during their first year — another change that was made after the 2023 survey.

    Students in this year’s survey said they want training that will be relevant to their careers. “I want to learn AI tools that are actually used in my industry, not just generic chatbots,” a mechanical engineering student responded. “Show me what engineers are actually doing with AI on the job.”

    The California Faculty Association, which represents about 29,000 educators in the CSU system, said in a February statement that faculty should be included in future systemwide decisions about AI, including whether the contract with OpenAI should be renewed in July.

    “CFA members continue to advocate for ethical and enforceable safeguards governing the use of artificial intelligence,” the CFA said in the statement, asking for “protections for using or refusing to use the technology, professional development resources to adapt pedagogy to incorporate the technology, and further protections for faculty intellectual property.”

    EdSource is an independent nonprofit organization that provides analysis on key education issues facing California and the nation. LAist republishes articles from EdSource with permission.

  • Sponsored message
  • SoCal institutions lean into April Fools' Day
    Multiple tennis courts can be seen from overhead.
    Tennis courts featured in an April Fools' Day social media post by Irvine.

    Topline:

    Many Southern California cities and institutions are dropping big, grabby news today — from the city of Irvine going "pickle-ball" only, to the Huntington Botanical Gardens announcing it'll be bottling the scent of the famed corpse flower as a perfume.

    Why now: Before you go "what the what" — remember today's the first day of April.

    Read on ... to find a roundup of some of the April Fools' jokes from your city and local trusted institutions.

    Many Southern California cities and institutions are dropping big, grabby news today. Before you go "what the what" — remember, it's the first day of April.

    Here's a roundup of some of the April Fools' news dump items.

    Irvine, the 'pickleball-only' city

    Irvine announced that it'll be converting all tennis courts into pickleball courts by 2027. That's one notch for Team Pickleball in the ongoing turf war between tennis lovers and pickleball players over the fight for court space to engage in their beloved sport.

    "Starting today, April 1, all tennis courts are being converted to pickleball courts as part of a citywide effort to make Irvine a pickleball-only City by 2027," the post stated. "We don’t just think this is a good idea … we dink it’s a great one."

    Catch that? They "dink" it's a great idea.

    All hail Queen Latifah in Long Beach

    Over in Long Beach, Mayor Rex Richardson announced the city's reigning royalty, the Queen Mary, will be renamed after another queen.

    "After careful consideration, I am proud to announce that the Queen Mary will officially be renamed the RMS Queen Latifah," he said. "Long Beach is stepping into a new era as a major music destination — with a new amphitheater, a deep cultural legacy, and a future built on sound. It’s only right that our most iconic Queen reflects that energy."

    In real-real news, LBC native and everyone's favorite Olympics commenter Snoop Dogg is headlining the grand opening show of the Long Beach Amphitheater in June. That's the new waterfront venue near the RMS Queen Latifah.

    Prolific author gets his own library branch

    Suspense writer James Patterson has more than 200 novels to his name, selling more than 450 million copies. If anyone deserves his own namesake branch, it would be Patterson, no?

    The Los Angeles Public Library certainly dinks so, announcing today the James Patterson Canoga Park branch, "with wall to wall Patterson books and programming centered around this prolific author."

    Eau de corpse flower

    The opening of the corpse flower has become an annual event at the Huntington Botanical Gardens. The event brings legions hoping to get a whiff of the famed flower's "pungent aroma."

    The San Marino institution announced that it's bottling the scent, as part of its new "The Huntington's Stank Collection."

    "A musky gym sock note opens this unique fragrance, with a sweet, rotten-egg base to ground it. Smells like you – but smellier," the post explained.

    Adopt something you can just leave at home, always

    Pasadena Humane got in on the fun with a special event — today only — where you can adopt a rock.

    "Adoption ROCKS! And today only, you can adopt a friend you won't take for granite," the message said.

  • Some listener, staff recs broken down by location
    A woman sorts through a rack of patterned shirts.
    We curated some great spots to thrift throughout the region.

    Topline:

    Southern California is home to a vast array of vintage boutiques, thrift stores, and resale shops. Here are the hottest recommendations from our most avid thrifters.

    Pasadena City College Flea Market

    Open on every third Sunday of the month, the flea market houses 400 vendors.

    The Left Bank

    For if you’re looking for something more curated. Located in Frogtown.

    Laura’s House

    Several locations throughout Orange County, including Costa Mesa and Aliso Viejo.

    Revivals

    Palm Springs is a apparently a thrifting hot spot. This thrift chain has locations throughout the Coachella Valley.

    Read more... for lots of other secondhand spots.

    Los Angeles may not be the fashion capital of the world, but it could contend for best thrift, at least in our humble opinion!

    The key is knowing where to look.

    Here are some of the best thrift and resale stores in different parts of Southern California according to our listeners and (very stylish) LAist colleagues.

    Pasadena

    Pasadena City College Flea Market

    The pinnacle of Pasadena and open every third Sunday of the month, the flea market houses 400 vendors with goods ranging from antique furniture to unique second-hand clothing.

    1570 E. Colorado Blvd., Pasadena

    Ritz Resale

    For high-end designer clothing, Dee in Pasadena, who likes handbags, recommends the consignment boutique, Ritz Resale.

    “I found a Coach bag that I paid about $19 for that I use all the time,” she said.

    2028 E. Villa St., Pasadena

    Hotbox Vintage

    If you’re looking for more affordable clothing and household items, Delaine Ureño, LAist senior institutional giving officer, frequents Hotbox Vintage in South Pasadena.

    1125 Mission St., South Pasadena

    Los Angeles

    The Ticktocker Thrift Shop

    This thrift shop in San Pedro is owned and operated by the Peninsula Chapter of National Charity League and comes recommended by Mel in the South Bay, who says proceeds support local charities and scholarship funds.

    353 W. 6th St., San Pedro

    Public Estrellas

    If you’re ever in Lincoln Heights, Sarah Steinman, LAist's membership manager, encourages people to check out her neighborhood thrift store.

    2701 N. Broadway, Los Angeles

    Society of St. Vincent de Paul

    This thrift store rec near Elysian Park comes from Lulu in Glendale, who says shoppers can grab a cute pair of pants along with unique furniture to put them in.

    210 N. Avenue 21, Los Angeles

    Berda Paradise

    “Full of treasures and benefits the Hollywood Health Clinic, which is a few doors down,” said Malka Fenyvesi, LAist's major gifts officer.

    3506 Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles

    The Left Bank

    LAist's Lucie Russo recommends The Left Bank in Frogtown if you’re looking for something more curated.

    2479 Fletcher Dr., Los Angeles

    Far Outfit

    Anything on Long Beach’s aptly named Retro Row is worth hitting, according to AirTalk producer Manny Valladares. His favorite spot is Far Outfit. They have unique finds mostly from the early 2000s with a self-described “weird” factor.

    2020 E. 4th St., Long Beach

    Orange County

    Laura’s House

    With several locations throughout Orange County, including Costa Mesa and Aliso Viejo, LAist reporter Yusra Farzan recommends Laura’s House, noting they have a great curated collection and proceeds help domestic violence victims.

    23635 El Toro Road, Suite F, Lake Forest

    Timeless Vintage

    Old Towne Orange is home to many great thrift stores and antique malls. If you’re looking for some good streetwear and sports jerseys, Timeless Vintage is a good choice. They have a great selection of 90s Looney Tunes and Disney graphic tees as well.

    110 1/2 S. Glassell St., Orange

    Retropolis

    Another O.C. favorite is a fairly new addition to downtown Fullerton. Retropolis has a wide selection of apparel, but I like to go there for their chunky 80s sweaters and colorful jackets.

    206 N. Harbor Blvd., Fullerton

    And Beyond

    Eco Thrift

    “[Eco Thrift] has really good discount days on top of already affordable clothing,” said Dañiel Martinez, LAist’s Weekend Edition producer. “Tons of good vintage and designer finds hidden in the racks.”

    1190 S. Garey Ave., Pomona

    Revivals

    “I went to Palm Springs where they have some of the best thrifting,” said AirTalk listener Monica in Artesia. She bought a pair of Ferragamo shoes for just $8.

    Kevin Tidmarsh, LAist’s All Things Considered producer, specifically recommends Revivals, a thrift chain with locations throughout the Coachella Valley.

    611 South Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs

  • Despite iconic restaurants closing their doors
    A grey blue building with a sign that reads "Echo Park Eats food delivery." There's a second sign that reads "good kitchen" with an arrow above the words pointing to the left.
    The storefront at Echo Park Eats, which rents ghost kitchens to 40 restaurants.

    Topline:

    Some of Los Angeles’s most iconic eateries — Papa Cristo’s in Pico-Union, Guerrilla Tacos in Downtown and French eatery TAIX in Echo Park — have closed their doors, prompting hand-wringing about the decline of the city’s rich and diverse food scene. But those closures obscured a more notable achievement; 758 new restaurants opened last year, surpassing the previous record set in 2024, when 729 restaurants opened.

    Self service and delivery apps: The explosion of digital-order services has rewritten the business model for restaurants, which are now operating with less space, reduced staff and tighter margins. Many of the new eateries do much of their business from behind a screen — either through self-service tablets or off delivery apps such as DoorDash, GrubHub and Uber Eats.

    Ghost kitchens: Ghost kitchens, or private kitchens used exclusively for delivery and takeout, have become a business model of their own. At Beverly Bites, 56 restaurants operate out of one facility serving the densely populated Beverly Hills and Beverlywood neighborhoods, though not all of them are open simultaneously. At Echo Park Eats, 40 restaurants are now within a five minute walk of Dodger Stadium.

    Some of Los Angeles’s most iconic eateries — Papa Cristo’s in Pico-Union, Guerrilla Tacos in Downtown and French eatery TAIX in Echo Park — have closed their doors, prompting hand-wringing about the decline of the city’s rich and diverse food scene.

    But those closures obscured a more notable achievement; 758 new restaurants opened last year, surpassing the previous record set in 2024, when 729 restaurants opened.

    The split-screen view of dining in Los Angeles is part of a broader transformation that is reshaping the industry nationwide.

    The explosion of digital-order services has rewritten the business model for restaurants, which are now operating with less space, reduced staff and tighter margins. Many of the new eateries do much of their business from behind a screen—either through self-service tablets or off delivery apps such as DoorDash, GrubHub and Uber Eats.

    So-called “limited-service” restaurants now account for nearly a third of all newly opened establishments. The number of traditional, or full-service, restaurants has also been growing, hitting 539 openings in 2025, and a record-high 587 the year before. If you count the number of coffee, smoothie and snack joints, the numbers rise even further.

    Pizza to go

    Many of Los Angeles’s restaurateurs are adapting to this burgeoning business model. Last year, Liz Gutierrez turned her pop-up restaurant, Fiorelli Pizza, into a small brick-and-mortar location in Beverly Grove with just a couple of stools at a counter for seating. As she saw restaurants closing their doors, the advantages of the new business model quickly dawned on her.

    “This was something that could be operated with minimum labor, it could be way more manageable in terms of fixed costs and expenses, and we could still deliver restaurant-quality [food],” Gutierrez said.

    The bevy of new food establishments opening their doors is a lone bright spot in an otherwise bleak economic picture: The total number of new businesses opening in the city is nearly half what it was a decade ago. That is driven in part by some of the same forces, such as Amazon.com, Inc. and other online retailers that put pressure on businesses operating out of traditional storefronts.

    But the flourishing restaurant industry has been able to buck that trend so far. While Amazon can deliver clothes and even groceries, it still can’t deliver a fresh pizza or poké bowl.

    The QR code will take your order

    Linchi Kwok, a hospitality management researcher at Collins College of Hospitality Management at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, said a lack of interest in working in the hospitality industry, paired with rising labor costs, has pushed restaurant owners to find cost-effective workarounds to run their operations with fewer people.

    “Limited-service restaurants don’t have to hire many people to do the work. It saves labor costs, saves space, and saves the service turn-around time. They don’t have to worry about it,” Kwok said.

    Restaurants must share a portion of their already slim profit margins—usually between 2-4% in L.A.—with an app service and the driver. To offset that, restaurants have cut down on staff, letting go of waiters, hostesses and dishwashers, many of whom are no longer needed when orders are increasingly being delivered in disposable containers.

    Despite the record number of openings, running a restaurant in the city has not gotten any easier. Jot Condie, president and chief executive of the California Restaurant Association, noted that in 2024 taxable restaurant revenue hit $11 billion, which, when adjusted for inflation, is on par with 2012 levels.

    “The piece of the pie that each restaurant gets is slimmer.”

    Condie also said that the hollowing out of entertainment work, increased presence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and stricter regulations “are conspiring against the L.A. restaurant scene.”

    Condie said that regulations from city hall, such as stricter labor oversight and a proposal for a $30 minimum wage for some workers, are making it even tougher.

    “The business environment is bad generally in L.A., but the city council and the mayor seem to be throwing salt in the wound.”

    As the number of new restaurant openings has spiked, so have the number of closings reported to the city. However, business closure figures are not as reliable as business opening data, as some establishments close without reporting it to the city. Since 2021, 593 full- and limited-service restaurants have reported closing, compared with 3,148 openings.

    Jimmy Chu spent several years working in fine dining, which inspired him to start his own restaurant. He knew it would be expensive. Rather than opening another fine-dining establishment, he opted for a limited-service restaurant where customers could order at the counter, no waiters involved.

    Chu quit his job by the end of 2024, and in May 2025, he opened Bomb Hot Dog in Downtown Los Angeles. He estimates that his eatery gets roughly a third of its customers through mobile delivery orders.

    Ghost kitchens

    Ghost kitchens, or private kitchens used exclusively for delivery and takeout, have become a business model of their own. At Beverly Bites, 56 restaurants operate out of one facility serving the densely populated Beverly Hills and Beverlywood neighborhoods, though not all of them are open simultaneously. At Echo Park Eats, 40 restaurants are now within a five minute walk of Dodger Stadium. The Los Angeles Dodgers schedule was hung on the wall inside the facility, so owners can anticipate heavy foot traffic and delivery orders during home games.  

    Last December, Ali Elreda rented out a space for his Mediterranean-Mexican fusion restaurant, Fatima’s Grill, at Echo Park Eats. 

    Elreda operates four brick-and-mortar Fatima’s Grill locations, and this is his first time renting a ghost kitchen. He said the decision to start a delivery and takeout location was both a matter of savings and efficiency.  

    “A lot of people are going the ghost-kitchen route because it’s quicker, it’s faster,” Elreda said. “You avoid a lot of overhead and foot traffic and having to find staff these days with the expensive economy out there is kind of tough.” 

    With ghost kitchen facilities, business owners also no longer have to compete with each other to find prime real estate in Los Angeles.  

    “You don’t have to do that research where you’ve got to find the right location. It’s just right there waiting for you,” Elreda said. 

    How we did it: We examined more than 15 years of business license data reported to the Los Angeles Office of Finance.  Have questions about our data or want to ask us something? Write to use at askus@xtown.la 
    Hyperlocal News