The Brief

Los Angeles is one of several counties in the state that delayed implementation of a new law that would open up treatment to more people living with serious mental illness and substance use issues.

Last month, the Board of Supervisors voted to postpone enacting the law, noting that the county was not yet ready to provide the facilities and services to make it work.

“Our health care facilities are not prepared for the magnitude of what this response could look like,” Board Chair Lindsey Horvath said before the vote to delay until January 2026.

But some mental health advocates and family members of people struggling with mental illness argue that waiting years to move forward with the new law would continue to keep those who are sickest out of lifesaving treatment.

“We can’t accept the status quo any longer,” said Teresa Pasquini, a longtime mental health advocate whose son lives with a serious mental illness.

“It’s killing our loved ones.”

The delay highlights the ongoing debate about what the new law, when in effect, will likely accomplish. Will it pave the way for counties to provide consistent, “last resort” behavioral health care for people who can’t provide it on their own? Or will it strip people of their individual rights, leading to people being warehoused under the guise of treatment?

What the new law does

Senate Bill 43, which was signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in October, changed state law to allow people living with a serious mental illness or severe substance use disorder — who are also unable to provide for their personal safety or medical care — to be deemed “gravely disabled” and held against their will.

According to Newsom’s office, SB 43 provided the first significant changes to existing conservatorship law in 50 years by broadening who is eligible, updating situations for which conservatorship can be considered and creating “the first-ever meaningful transparency” into data on conservatorships.

“The mental health crisis affects us all, and people who need the most help have been too often overlooked,” the governor said in a news release. “We are working to ensure no one falls through the cracks, and that people get the help they need and the respect they deserve.”

The bill gave counties the option of implementing the law at the start of this year or waiting until 2026. A majority of the counties opted to wait.

That choice is distressing to many families dealing with severe mental illness and who have seen their loved ones cycle from treatment facilities they say are inadequate to the streets and, in some cases, jail.

Mark Gale, criminal justice chair for the National Alliance on Mental Illness of Greater L.A. County said families of loved ones living with serious mental illness have been waiting too long for changes to the law that they believe will open up more options for care. He said advocates like himself are “exhausted” and “disappointed” at counties’ decision to delay.

“Some people with mental illness are gonna continue to make catastrophic decisions for themselves until they’re found dead… ,” Gale said. “I’m not waiting for that.”

Opponents fear return to 'warehousing'

Others see SB 43 not as a way forward, but means of reverting to the past, when people living with mental illness were too often warehoused in inhumane conditions across the country.

They worry that the new law will ultimately lead to more locked facilities that will provide a prison-like setting rather than a therapeutic one.

Vanessa Ramos of Disability Rights California has been diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder and substance use issues. She has been sober for nearly 12 years. She told LAist she is concerned that under SB 43, California will be on a path to creating more locked facilities that are easier to enter than they are to exit.

“SB43 has the ingredients to banish poor, non-white and white and, for sure, disabled people for the lack of community-based mental health and harm reduction services that people need,” Ramos said.

Of particular concern for Ramos are people living with severe substance-use issues. The new law allows them to be placed on an involuntary hold and make them possibly eligible for conservatorship if they are unable to provide for their personal safety or necessary medical care.

Gary Tsai, director of Substance Abuse Prevention and Control at the county Department of Health, pointed out last month that right now there is no involuntary care model for people living with substance use issues. Tsai told the Board of Supervisors that infrastructure would need to be built out in order for the county to provide appropriate care under the new law.

But even if that infrastructure were available, some local health advocates still don’t think it’s a good idea.

Carolina Valle, senior policy director for the California Pan-Ethnic Health Network, said Angelenos already have enough information from history to be suspicious of locking people up with substance use disorders.

“It’s called the War on Drugs,” Valle said. “We had models of involuntary substance use treatment, it was called jails and prisons and we continue to have those today.”

Valle said she’d like to see SB 43 not only delayed, but repealed.

Newsom wants more urgency

Newsom has said that he’s not happy with counties that have chosen to postpone SB 43 implementation.

“We cannot wait until 2026... on the conservatorship reform,” Newsom told reporters during a virtual news conference last month. “People literally will lose their lives. And people are losing confidence and trust in government.”

Newsom’s demands for urgency on the part of counties comes just as the most populous areas of the state launch CARE Court, a new program he championed that aims to get more people living with serious mental illness into treatment.

And the governor wants voters to agree to open up new funding to pay for the mental health care and housing infrastructure needed to make all of these legislative moves successful.

Earlier this month, Newsom was joined in L.A. by Mayor Karen Bass and others to drum up support for Proposition 1, the measure on the ballot in March which his office says would raise more than $6 billion for mental health treatment facilities and housing.

Community advocates and elected officials are amplifying Know Your Rights information and rapid response networks as an increase in immigration enforcement once again hits California.

On Saturday, neighbors in North Long Beach rushed out of their homes and blocked federal immigration agents from detaining a man they violently knocked to the ground.

Unión del Barrio has shared video footage of immigration agents spotted in Inglewood, Koreatown and East LA in recent days and is urging residents “to be cautious during this wave of deportations” and to “not surrender to fear.”

With just weeks before the Nov. 3 election, community and labor organizations, including InnerCity Struggle, have hosted voter-protection trainings to ensure voters understand how to protect their votes and what they can do in the face of any interference. 

While there are no known examples of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at California polling places, organizers at a recent training said even rumors can create fear and urged trainees to encourage voters to stay in line and to observe and document what’s happening. 

The Boyle Heights Immigrant Rights Network last week said it is continuing its rapid response efforts and seeking volunteers to spread the word about what people can do when they spot ICE agents. 

“Sharing this information and encouraging people to commit to these different opportunities is the best thing we can do to help protect our community,” said Ken Campa, director of programs at Proyecto Pastoral. 

Here’s who to call if you spot ICE:

Boyle Heights Immigrant Rights Network

Hotline: (323) 805-1049

Instagram: @boyleheightsirn

Los Angeles Raids and Rapid Response Network

Hotline: (888) 624-4752

Unión Del Barrio

Hotline: (213) 444-6561

Instagram: @uniondelbarrio

Immigrant Defenders Law Center

Hotline: (213) 833-8283

Instagram: @immdef_lawcenter

Have this information ready, advocates say:

• Date and time of the sighting or activity
• The street name or description of the area where officials were seen
• Pictures or videos with time stamps of the current interaction
• First-person witness testimony

Join Know Your Rights workshops

The Immigrant Defenders Law Center is offering free virtual Know Your Rights webinars.

Oct. 21 at 6:30 p.m. (Spanish)

Oct. 22 at 6:30 p.m. (English)

Oct. 28 at 6 p.m. (Bilingual; Detention-focused)

Register here: https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/cNo_v5Z6RVu7ahDCsfn2ig#/registration

The post Rapid response groups say ICE is surging in California. Here’s what you can do appeared first on LA Local.

As the Nov. 3 election draws closer, many of us have yet to vote. Why? ‘Cause the ballot is long! Voting guides can help.

LAist has one: Our Voter Game Plan is a nonpartisan guide to elections in Los Angeles County and in Orange County that lays out the information you need to understand the positions and issues on the ballot and then evaluate your choices to make sure they align with your values and beliefs.

What we don't do is tell you how to vote.

That said, we know it can also be helpful to look to organizations or individuals that you trust to see where they stand on a particular candidate or initiative, and use those endorsements as a guide for filling out your ballot.

That’s where this evolving guide to L.A.'s and O.C.'s many voting guides comes in. This is by no means an exhaustive list. But it’s a good place to start. To keep things simple, we have divided this list into four broad categories including guides that lean left — as Los Angeles and California overwhelmingly do — as well as guides that lean right, guides from the top political parties, and guides from news organizations. If we missed a guide that you think would be helpful to share here, please email us and we might include it:

Voter guides that lean to the left

This lists starts with organization local to L.A.:

East Area Progressive Democrats

The EAPD meets every month at a coffee house in Eagle Rock and started in late 2013 to fight for more progressive representation. With more than 1,100 members, they call themselves the largest Democratic club in L.A. County and California. EAPD says its top issues include housing for all, dignity for workers and universal healthcare. The group is led by Hans Johnson, an organizer who specializes in coalition strategy and environmental activism. Their endorsements are short and to the point.

Knock LA

Knock LA started as a Medium blog in 2017 when members of Ground Game LA, a grassroots community organizing group, decided to start their own news outlet for alt-weekly style coverage of the topics they cared most about, including police misconduct, labor abuse and the housing crisis. They are a self-described horizontally organized publication, meaning they try to make all major decisions by group consensus, and they don’t accept funding from advertisers or “any source that may influence [their] coverage.” The Knock team writes that their voter guide is a “labor of love for a better Los Angeles.” If you feel strongly about “building and preserving affordable housing, stopping planet-destroying emissions, reimagining public safety and getting people off the streets and sustainably into shelter and housing,” this is your guide.

La Defensa

This group describes themselves as “femme-led and abolitionist.” They are also affiliated with The La Defensa Justice PAC, which is dedicated to supporting progressive judicial candidates for L.A. County’s Superior Court. The group is led by mostly women of color who are immigration and social-justice minded. Their guide is a detailed one with candidates tagged with a hearty "endorsed," a more tempered "recommended," or a "harm reduction" label, which indicates that while the candidate doesn't earn the group’s endorsement, they are seen as the best alternative. La Defensa also outlines their “vetting criteria” for individual candidates, explaining what factors they considered while determining endorsement.

L.A. Forward

L.A. Forward is a political organizing group working to grow and support a progressive base in almost every L.A. City Council District. Their guide breaks down the races and offers up details about why a particular candidate has earned their endorsement. L.A. Forward hosts a Progressive Campaign Leadership Academy to recruit and train a diverse cohort of Los Angeles County residents to be the next generation of candidates and campaign staffers, along with a Judicial Leadership Academy that helps social justice-oriented attorneys run for seats as Los Angeles County Superior Court judges.

Leyla’s Extremely Opinionated 2026 General Election Voter Guide

Leyla Farah is a self-described political junkie, tech nerd, travel addict and author of the book Black, Gifted and Gay. Her guide is on Medium and is delivered with a healthy dose of cynicism. It includes personal recommendations sprinkled with fun little disclaimers like “Our political system is a giant turducken” and "All candidate qualifications being equal, I’ll pick the non-white, non-guy, non-cis, non-straight (you get where I’m going with this) candidate every time."

California Working Families Party

This one is a little different in that it’s a political party that sometimes runs its own candidates through Democratic Party primaries or on their own. The California Working Families Party was founded in 1998 by a coalition of labor unions. They describe themselves on X as “a progressive grassroots political party building a multiracial, feminist movement of working people to transform America.” Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders called the party “the closest thing to socialism” in 2016, although they officially endorsed U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren when she ran for president in 2020. Their endorsements are straightforward, and include candidates up and down the state, so you'll need to sift through a bit to find Los Angeles. They also cover races in several other states, including Arizona, Colorado and Texas.

Courage California

A nonprofit organization with over a million members, according to their website, Courage California’s mission is to “defend and extend economic justice, human rights and corporate and political accountability.” Their “Know Your Vote” downloadable guide outlines the big-picture impact of each race and which California organizations support or oppose each proposition. Courage California also publishes the highly detailed Progressive Voter Guide, in which they “combine the endorsements of California’s leading progressive organizations with our expert knowledge and research” to provide recommendations for races at the local level too.

American Civil Liberties Union

The ACLU has long been recognized for supporting big-picture issues like criminal justice reform, immigrant rights and reproductive freedom. The Southern California chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union has published a voter guide to propositions on this fall’s ballot.

While ACLU SoCal’s guide doesn’t get into individual candidate races, the organization’s nonpartisan political arm, ACLU California Action, does. They’ve published the survey results of a questionnaire submitted to candidates running for California Senate, Assembly, and two U.S. Congressional districts. The questions posed to candidates were answered with either “yes,” “no” or “no reply.” They’re intended to illuminate candidate viewpoints on larger issues like LGBTQ+ rights, homelessness and ICE activity.

Planned Parenthood Action Fund  

The political arm of Planned Parenthood bills itself as a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization involved in grassroots organizing, education campaigns and electioneering. Their mission is in line with Planned Parenthood writ large, according to their about page: “to improve the quality and affordability of reproductive and sexual health care, protect and expand services that prevent unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease and ensure continued access to safe, legal and confidential abortion care.” Accordingly, their 2026 voter guide endorses candidates based on their stance on family planning and women's health. The national nonprofit endorses candidates for U.S. Congress, while the Los Angeles County contingent outlines who they support in local and state races.

Voter guides that lean to the right

Nancy's Picks

Conservative Republican Nancy Sandoval says her guide aims to help the busy conservative voter who doesn't have the time to do the research, but cares about voting in alignment with their conservative convictions, especially on lesser known items. Each election, she goes deep on all offices and propositions for all of Orange County's city and county races.

Here is her 2026 midterm election guide. She bases her criteria on conservative convictions including securing and sealing the nation's borders, parental rights in education and supporting an "America First" agenda. Sandoval explains her extensive methodology here: "The selections are made from group forums, personal knowledge, interviews, on-line research, questionnaires sent, various outside vote guides, candidate endorsements, voting records, candidate statements, testimonies of reliable secondary sources, and various news media. I also verify the amount of money a candidate has to run an effective campaign."

Election Forum

This is a guide for evangelical Christians who say they're fighting for conservative values locally. Election Forum is a national nonprofit with wings in Los Angeles and Nashville, led by conservative political commentator and author Craig Huey.

Their guide “will help you cut through the rhetoric, election propaganda and biased media coverage of the campaigns” by evaluating candidates based on their views on crime, government spending and the Bible, according to the group’s website. For access to their California guide, Election Forum requires you first register with your name, email and ZIP code.

Reform California

Assemblymember Carl DeMaio leads this group with the goal of “taking back our state from far-Left politicians and special interests.” DeMaio currently represents north and east San Diego County in the California Assembly's 75th District. He’s also served one term on the San Diego City Council, hosts a conservative news radio show and is an enthusiastic supporter of President Donald Trump.

Beyond that, he is playing a huge role in the Nov. 3 general election: DeMaio is the architect behind Proposition 39, the voter ID initiative. You can hear more about DeMaio's campaign here on the LAist podcast, Imperfect Paradise:

Reform California believes that the Democratic Party's domination in California has become extremist and ineffective. According to Reform, their “Plain English,” all-state Voter Guide supports “the most principled reform-minded candidates” and “provides an easy-to-understand truthful description of deceptive ballot measures that politicians put on the ballot.” The organization also provides county-specific endorsements. Here's the guide for Los Angeles County. Here's the guide for Orange County.

Christian Voter Guide

This voter guide is national in scope but does include a guide to voting in local Orange County elections, including races in the Irvine Unified School District, Orange Unified School District and North Orange County Community College District.

The guide breaks down candidate answers to six questions, including their stance on removing books with explicit sexual content from schools and public libraries and whether individuals should be allowed to access school restrooms based on their gender expression.

Voter guides from political parties

Los Angeles County and Orange County Democratic Party

The L.A. County Democratic Party describes itself as the largest and most influential local Democratic Party in the country. This local chapter of the Democratic party is run by seven elected members who are chosen from each state Assembly district of Los Angeles County during presidential primaries — and serve as the official governing body of the LACDP.

The slate of endorsements go deep, including federal, state and local Los Angeles races. You can find the Orange County Democratic Party Statewide Endorsements here, and their guide to Orange County elections here.

Democratic Socialists of Los Angeles

The local chapter of Democratic Socialists of America, is endorsing nine candidates this election cycle, including Nithya Raman, who is hoping to make the jump from Los Angeles City Council member to mayor. The party identifies as “a team of union leaders, renters, tenant organizers, parents, and activists who are committed to working class values and ready to create real change across Los Angeles.”

The DSALA supports a “multiracial working class” and reforms like Medicare for All, defunding the police and the Green New Deal. They say they aren’t a political party or a nonprofit, but rather “a socialist organization,” according to their website.

The Republican Party of L.A. County and the Republican Party of Orange County

The L.A. GOP is chaired by Roxanne Hoge, an actor and business owner who unsuccessfully ran for a Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors seat in 2022. "With over 1 million Republicans registered, Los Angeles County is the largest Republican county party in the USA," its website says. Here's the L.A. GOP's guide to the upcoming election and it's goal: "We need you here to stop incompetent one-party rule. We want to connect you with the fellow Angelenos who want good governance and who believe in individual liberty."

The Republican Party of Orange County has published its 2026 General Election voter guide here. The chair of the O.C. GOP is William O’Neill, an attorney who has served on the Newport Beach City Council and as mayor. Here's why this election matters, O’Neill says in a statement on the O.C. GOP’s website: “What we do here in Orange County ripples throughout our state and our nation. We are a beacon of hope, safety, security, and freedom. We are the counterexample to the lawlessness and policy abuses inflicted by Democratic elected officials in Sacramento, San Francisco and Los Angeles. Join us!”

Voter guides from news organizations

CalMatters 

Self-described as, “the leading nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom committed to explaining California politics and policy,” CalMatters’ voter guide is exhaustive. It has categories for state offices, the Legislature, and propositions, and includes side-by-side comparisons of candidate campaign finance. This voter guide also includes incredibly accessible explanations of individual propositions and the reasons to support or oppose each measure. One standout feature of CalMatters’ guide is the “proposition quizzes”; it's an interactive series of questions that helps you “weigh your thoughts on each ballot measure to figure out how to vote.”

Los Angeles Times

The Los Angeles Times got out of the endorsement game after its owner spiked the editorial board's presidential endorsement in 2024, leading several staff members to resign in protest. As it has for many years, though, the paper's news staff produces thorough, non-endorsement-style guides to statewide and local elections. The outlet's guide can be found here.

The Orange County Register

The Register's Voter Guide goes deep on Orange County candidates as well as candidates whose districts straddle Los Angeles. It also publishes in-depth looks at races and measures that cut across the state. This one leans more “guide” and less “endorsement” in that each candidate is offered the chance to fill out a questionnaire where they answer questions about “housing policy, the state's role in working with or against the federal government on issues impacting Californians, what's next for disaster relief efforts, among other important topics.”

The LAist guide to voter guides was first published in 2024 and written by journalist Gina Pollack, and has since been updated. LAist's Rene Lynch also contributed to this report. If you have a voter guide you think should be included here, email us a link to the guide, with a brief explanation about why you believe LAist readers will find it helpful.

Tens of thousands of state government workers are expected to walk off the job Wednesday in a one-day strike that could affect services at the DMV, unemployment offices and more.

Members of SEIU Local 1000 are protesting what they argue are bad-faith bargaining practices by Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration. The union has been negotiating a new labor agreement since its latest three-year contract expired on June 30, and the strike would be Local 1000’s first statewide walkout in its 44-year history.

The union represents about 100,000 public workers, with members employed in dozens of agencies across California. They’re accountants, government analysts, nurses, IT workers, custodians and more.

Local 1000 could call off the work stoppage at any time leading up to Wednesday. But if it happens, here’s how the strike could affect you.

Can I still go to the DMV

Yes, you can, but services could be delayed depending on who is participating in the strike. DMV offices might close early, too, a department spokesperson said. The same holds for other public-facing services, including unemployment benefits at the Employment Development Department and food assistance at CalFresh.

State parks could be affected, too, even though rangers are not represented by Local 1000. Hearst Castle in San Luis Obispo County, for instance, adjusted its tour schedule to accommodate people who’ve already reserved spots to see the newspaper magnate’s estate.

This may not be ideal from a customer service standpoint, but union president Anica Walls urges Californians “to give our employees some grace.”

“If you happen to go to the DMV office and the services are limited, make an appointment for another day,” Walls said. “Realize that we are standing up for 100,000 state workers who have not had a good living wage. … It’s not just about state employees. It really is about the working class.”

Which state workers can't strike?

Local 1000 represents almost half of the state’s workforce, and 95,000 workers would be able to participate in the strike. The remaining 5,000 workers are legally excluded from the strike, because their absence “would create an imminent and substantial threat to public health or safety,” according to the union. In general, they work in healthcare or public safety.

Eight state agencies and divisions employ workers who are deemed essential. These include workers such as veterans homes nurses, cooks at state prisons, Caltrans dispatchers and others:

• Department of Veterans Affairs
• Correctional Health Care Services
• Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
• Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Adult Parole Operations
• Department of Education
• Department of Developmental Services
• Department of State Hospitals
• Caltrans

To see which employees at which worksites are deemed essential, check out this list.

How did we get here?

Many state workers are frustrated with Newsom, who has demanded wage cuts to help balance the budget in three of the eight years he’s led the state. These cuts essentially negated the last 3% salary increase he gave Local 1000 members.

Pointing to a $20 billion increase in general fund spending over the past two years, the union wants better pay and more affordable healthcare coverage than the administration has offered. It also wants more flexibility to work from home, pushing back against the governor’s return-to-office mandate for state workers.

But talks have been contentious. In July, the union filed a complaint with the state’s Public Employment Relations Board, accusing CalHR, the state agency that handles labor negotiations, of delaying negotiations and rejecting proposals outright. Last month the labor board sided with the union and concluded that CalHR “refused to meet and confer in good faith.”

Earlier this month, union members authorized the strike. Local 1000 members will hold demonstrations in more than a dozen cities, including Oakland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego and Sacramento, where members will also hold a march to lawmakers’ offices near the Capitol.

How has the Newsom administration responded?

In response to the labor board’s findings, Angela Musallam, CalHR’s deputy director of communications, said in an email to CalMatters that “the state has been and remains open to negotiation” She added that the state “is prepared to move into mediation to assist the parties in reaching an agreement.”

CalHR also filed an unfair practice complaint of its own to the board in an effort to stop the strike. CalHR claimed that the strike was unlawful because the union did not initially identify which essential workers would be excluded from the walkout. The union disagreed with CalHR’s interpretation of events, arguing that it did identify these employees. The board sided with the union last week, rejecting CalHR’s request for an injunction.

Could there be another strike?

Both parties are scheduled to meet for mediation talks on Oct. 30. For now the union is planning to only strike on Wednesday, but Walls said that if the Newsom administration continues to engage in bad-faith bargaining, the union will “escalate” its actions. This could include filing another complaint with the labor board, and potentially holding another strike.

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

An employee of Los Angeles County’s Office of Emergency Management has sued his employer, alleging he was retaliated against for making whistleblower complaints about the response to the deadly Eaton Fire.

Nicholas Vaquero, an associate director in the Office of Emergency Management, alleges that officials leading the office failed to properly staff the response to the fire, which killed at least 19 people and burned thousands of homes and businesses in January 2025.

He also alleges the county’s emergency alerts were inadequate and that it submitted fraudulent data in order to receive FEMA reimbursement. Vaquero says in the suit that he used official county whistleblower channels to raise his concerns, in addition to speaking to OEM’s top two officials, Director Kevin McGowan and Deputy Director Leslie Luke.

Vaquero’s lawyers and the county declined to comment on the substance of the lawsuit. “L.A. County is going to address the allegations in court,” spokesperson Elizabeth Marcellino wrote in a statement to LAist.

LAist previously reported on Vaquero’s whistleblower complaint, in which he alleged that a now-retired employee with “a long history of sleeping on the job” was put in charge of emergency workers sending evacuation alerts and was asleep during critical moments of the first night of the Eaton Fire, when many of the deaths and much of the devastation occurred. County officials deny this account.

In the lawsuit, Vaquero alleges he has faced retaliation after raising his concerns, including being excluded from meetings he previously was a part of and being treated with hostility by the department’s leadership, among other things.

The complaint comes after county leadership launched a three-year restructuring of the Office of Emergency Management, which includes working to add staff and to conduct regular training for all staff on emergency alert software.

An after-action report from the McChrystal Group highlighted that the emergency management office was severely short-staffed during the fire. The department, which serves 10 million people, had a staff of 37 people at the time the fires broke out. Meanwhile, New York City has a population of 8.5 million and an emergency management staff of about 200 people, the report noted.