The Brief

It’s now nearly impossible to pass through the majority Latino neighborhood of Oak View in Huntington Beach without being captured on camera. The city quietly signed two contracts in April to install 10 high-tech surveillance cameras trained on the main entrances, arteries and gathering areas of the densely-packed neighborhood that covers about half a square mile.

The AI-equipped cameras have 360 degree vision, night vision, and most are capable of magnifying a subject up to 32 times, like a telescope, without losing image quality. They also expose long simmering tensions in Oak View.

On the one hand, some residents of this historically neglected neighborhood told LAist they welcomed the added surveillance if it helps deter crime and catch criminals.

But others question the city’s motives at a time when local officials have pledged to support the federal government’s efforts to find and deport hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants. They worry the cameras could be used to facilitate racial profiling, or that they could lead to Oak View residents being targeted for federal immigration enforcement.

“The truth is we need more security in this community,” said Hortensia Villanueva, who said she’s lived in the community for more than three decades.

At the same time, Villanueva said things were already “tense” in the community since immigration agents began chasing, tackling and detaining suspected undocumented immigrants across Los Angeles and Orange County.

“What we’re seeing on television, the children are freaking out thinking their parents are going to be taken away or beat up,” Villanueva said. “That affects all of us.”

She said she has mixed feelings about the cameras, and hopes they will only be used to catch criminals, and to curb crimes like graffiti and drunk driving.

In an emailed response to questions about the cameras from LAist, City spokesperson Corbin Carson wrote that the Oak View cameras “were installed due to incidents of vandalism, gun violence, and assaults.” He said additional cameras are being installed throughout the city.

“These cameras will provide real-time officer safety information to responding officers by delivering critical, situational awareness before officers arrive on scene,” he wrote.

LAist also reached out about the cameras to City Council members Gracey Van Der Mark and Casey McKeon, who also sit on the city’s Oak View Task Force, but did not receive a response.

Split contracts, no city council vote

Public records show the city signed two separate contracts in April with the security company Convergint to install the 10 cameras in and around the Oak View neighborhood.

Rules require City Council approval for any contract for services worth more than $100,000.

The contracts, if combined, would have met that threshold.

One of the contracts was for four 360-degree cameras at a cost of $50,488; the other, at a cost of $96,058, was for six camera pairs that allow for 360-degree surveillance, 32x optical zoom, movement tracking and audio detection.

Approving the contracts without a City Council vote “raises red flags,” said Mark Bixby, a local watchdog and publisher of Surf City Sentinel, who discovered the camera contracts.

By avoiding a vote, the city also avoided a public debate about the cameras and a chance for city council members to ask questions about their intended use.

Carson, the city spokesperson, said the contracts were “completed at different times with different funding sources” and one being a grant. “Therefore, the contracts were procured separately,” Carson said.

But both contracts are dated April 3, 2025, in the city’s contract database. They were both signed by Burns and other city officials, and approved by City Manager Travis Hopkins. Burns told LAist he didn’t recall approving the cameras, and didn’t have any information about them.

A 360-degree security camera is affixed to a light pole in Oak View.

(

Jill Replogle

/

LAist

)

In February 2023, the council did unanimously approve funding for five security cameras that year to address retail crime in the city at a total cost of $50,000. During the meeting, police department leaders said they hoped to install 25 security cameras around the city over the subsequent five years, focused on areas with the most retail crime. But it’s unclear if the cameras in Oak View are part of that plan. There are retail businesses around the perimeter of the neighborhood, but not in the vicinity of most of the cameras.

Oscar Rodriguez, a former City Council candidate who grew up in Oak View, said he and other community leaders have questions, including “if this type of surveillance is going to be used for immigration enforcement in some way, shape, or form or capacity? And if so, is the city of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Police Department going to assist immigration officials with their immigration enforcement?”

Huntington Beach’s growing surveillance network

The cameras add to a growing surveillance network around the city, with a particular focus on Oak View. The city also has three automated license plate readers from the company Flock Safety at major exits from the neighborhood, which appears to be an unusually high density for a residential area compared to the rest of the city, according to the crowd-sourced website, deflock.me. Data from license plate readers in other Southern California cities has been shared with federal immigration authorities in the past.

The city’s most recent contract with Flock Safety, in effect as of July 2024, includes a clause stating the company “may access, use, preserve and/ or disclose the Footage to law enforcement authorities, government officials, and/ or third parties, if legally required to do so” or if the company “has a good faith belief” that providing access to the footage “is reasonably necessary to comply with a legal process, enforce this Agreement, or detect, prevent or otherwise address security, privacy, fraud or technical issues, or emergency situations.”

Just this week, Huntington Beach police launched a new “drones as first responders program” to deploy drones to crimes or public safety incidents. Police Lt. Chris Nesmith said Tuesday that the drones will only record footage when responding to an emergency call.

“ The citizens don't need to worry about officers spying in their backyards or surveilling them,” he said. “This isn't a Big Brother program.”

City leaders say the drones can respond to a call for service in under 2 minutes.

(

Jill Replogle

/

LAist

)

Jeramie Scott, who heads the surveillance oversight program at the nonprofit Electronic Privacy Information Center, said he’s skeptical of using surveillance cameras to prevent crime, especially in neighborhoods.

“Surveillance equipment and surveillance, in general, are a lot of times a crutch for bad social policies,” he said. “They don't solve the underlying issues of crime.”

He noted that the new system installed in Oak View has the ability to analyze information and alert officers. Scott said he would be concerned the cameras could be used by police to hone in on residents or locations based on “shaky parameters,” like loitering, “as a flag for potential criminal activity.”

“People loiter all the time. It's not indicative of a crime, per se,” he said. “So if [the camera system] is being used in that way, then all of a sudden you're having increased police presence.”

Scott also questioned how the data from cameras would be stored and under what conditions it could be released to other law enforcement agencies, including federal immigration authorities.

Carson, the city spokesperson, said the city follows California law limiting data-sharing with federal immigration authorities. “Unless legally compelled through a valid court order or warrant, we do not provide non-public video footage or other records to immigration enforcement,” he wrote.

The city recently used a $5 million grant from Caltrans to make improvements in the neighborhood, including street signage, landscape, and ongoing graffiti and trash abatement.

(

Jill Replogle

/

LAist

)

Oak View’s history of neglect 

Oak View has long been among the city’s poorest neighborhoods. The median household income is around $74,000 compared to around $120,000 for the city as a whole, according to Census data.

Once a Japanese American settlement, the neighborhood is now majority Latino, compared to the city as a whole, which is only about 20% Latino, according to Census data.

Nearly 60% of residents living in the Census tract that encompasses Oak View speak a language other than English at home, and 28% are foreign-born.

Despite a 2016 legal settlement with trash hauler Republic Services to enclose its adjacent transfer station, the smell of ripe garbage still occasionally wafts through the rows of bungalows, two-story apartment complexes, and modest single-family homes.

Residents have historically complained about crime and gang activity in Oak View, although rates had reportedly dropped in the years leading up the pandemic. Current crime data for the neighborhood is not publicly available, and LAist was unable to obtain data from the city in time for this story.

Last year, the city invested $6.5 million ($5 million from Caltrans) to repave Oak View’s streets, improve street lighting and landscaping, and add colorful signs and crosswalks. That grant, said Carson, also paid for some of the new security cameras.

“Once that project was completed, the [police] department received numerous complaints about vandalism to the revitalized area," he wrote. "To identify those responsible and deter additional costly damage, public safety cameras were installed.”

Rodriguez, the former City Council candidate, said the relationship between the community and the city government and police department had improved over the last decade. The city also holds periodic town hall-style meetings in the community.

 ”I think it's important for the community to have that trust with the city,” Rodriguez said. “That's the goal, right?”

But that trust has been put to the test under the current local and national administrations.

All-MAGA council declares HB a 'non-sanctuary city'

Huntington Beach’s defiantly conservative city government has made national headlines in recent years — over its efforts to restrict controversial books at the city’s public library, install a “MAGA” plaque for the library’s anniversary, and implement a voter ID rule that runs contrary to state election rules.

The plaque that has generated all the controversy in this beach city.

(

Courtesy Huntington Beach

)

At the council’s first meeting of 2025, the day after President Donald Trump was inaugurated, Huntington Beach City Council members voted unanimously to declare the city a “non-sanctuary city.” It was a direct challenge to the state’s sanctuary law, the California Values Act, which restricts local law enforcement agencies from assisting with federal immigration enforcement except in the case of individuals convicted of violent crimes.

The city and the police department also sued the state of California over the state’s sanctuary law, arguing that it forces the city to violate federal law. They also argued in a March 2025 court filing that the city is “harmed by the presence of increased numbers of illegal aliens,” including lowered tax revenue and property values and “increased expenditure of public funds to provide public services to illegal aliens.”

America First Legal, a law firm co-founded by Stephen Miller, the architect of Trump’s immigration strategy, is representing the city.

The state has argued that the city can’t challenge a state law in federal court. The case is ongoing.

Shortly after Huntington Beach passed its “non-sanctuary city” resolution, city leaders held a town hall meeting for Oak View residents at a nearby Catholic church. At the meeting, then-City Attorney Michael Gates sought to assure the crowd that officers wouldn’t out undocumented immigrants to the federal government unless they landed in police custody. (Gates is now a deputy assistant attorney general in the U.S. Department of Justice.)

“We can all go to the grocery store without concern,” he told the standing-room-only crowd. “We can go to church without concern, we can go to the doctor without concern. Living day-to-day, there's no concern that there's immigration enforcement in our police department.

“But if you've committed a crime in Huntington Beach and you're in police custody, they will communicate with the federal government."

Oak View residents told LAist they were unaware of any major ICE presence in the neighborhood in recent months. But there have been round-ups at some nearby car washes and Home Depot parking lots.

Gina Clayton-Tarvin, a trustee at the Ocean View School District, which includes Oak View Elementary, said she worries the neighborhood cameras — including one near the school’s entrance and a second camera on school district property near the preschool — will be used to “spy on” families.  

”People are already nervous in the community,” she said, adding that participation in the school’s summer meals program, and at the local Boys and Girls Club, had dropped precipitously compared to recent years.

“And then these cameras are magically just in the Oak View community, they're not in my neighborhood and I live a half a mile from Oak View,” she said. “So really what's going on? Really what I feel is it's like a form of racial profiling. It's a way to scare people."

Yusra Farzan contributed reporting.

Voters on Saturday rejected a measure that would have weakened California’s landmark environmental law by fast-tracking reviews for some projects.

With about 76% of votes counted, voters rejected Prop. 45 by 55.7% to 44.3%.

The vote maintains the status quo under the state’s Environmental Quality Act, which since 1970 has required public agencies to review project developments that could have harmful environmental impacts, and mitigate those harms.

“Californians have sent a clear message to corporate developers, utilities and data center builders that they will not stand for a broad assault at the ballot box on state law protecting our air, water and natural resources,” No on 45’s Woody Little said. “We were outspent but not outgunned.”

Supporters had said the changes would reduce building costs. The California Chamber of Commerce sponsored Proposition 45, the Building an Affordable California Act, which would limit the length of environmental reviews for projects deemed “essential” to 365 business days and require courts to resolve litigation in 270 calendar days. Those projects include housing, water, broadband and transit developments.

Proponents said the savings from building more quickly would pass to consumers and spent $41 million campaigning for the measure. The Building a Better California political action committee was the largest donor, giving $10 million to the campaign. The organization is funded partly by current and former Google executives Sergey Brin and Eric Schmidt. Two of the largest investor-owned utilities, Pacific Gas & Electric Company and Southern California Edison, together donated $4.4 million.

Environmental groups argued the measure would go too far in weakening a law meant to protect people from environmental harms. Opponents, including a coalition of environmental, health and union organizations, spent $30 million trying to stop it. Wendy Schmidt, a Democratic philanthropist, was the largest donor, giving $10 million to the campaign. The political action committee Clean and Healthy California Sponsored by Environmental Organizations contributed $7 million.

The California Democratic Party opposed the measure. The California Republican Party supported it, while county Republican groups were split.

Deborah Sivas, an environmental law professor at Stanford University, said Prop. 45 would radically change current law. It would shift power “away from local governments and to developers by giving them some new tools … and limiting what courts can do in terms of reviewing decisions that agencies and local governments make,” she said.

CEQA and housing

California’s environmental review law, signed in 1970, requires agencies to assess the environmental impacts of developments and help mitigate them.

Over decades, developers have raised concerns about the process, arguing litigation and bureaucracy slow down construction.

State legislators have tried to fix the problem by passing laws that exempt or streamline certain projects from environmental review. In 2025, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed laws that exempt many urban housing projects from the full review process.

But some supporters of Prop. 45, including the California Building Industry Association and the California Council for Affordable Housing, say those changes don’t go far enough.

“It’s an important piece of the puzzle, but (that type of housing) does not produce quickly or at scale,” said Jennifer Hernandez, an attorney who helped write the measure. “We need quicker, at scale, affordable housing.”

Supporters say Prop. 45 would help California redevelop large, unused sites like malls and parking lots into housing and make it easier to build away from urban areas.

Pro-housing groups, public agencies divided 

Pro-housing and local government groups usually support CEQA reform, but Prop. 45 has divided many of them.

Housing advocates in the Bay Area, including East Bay for Everyone and the Greenbelt Alliance, oppose the measure. Other Yes in My Backyard groups are neutral, including Abundant Housing Los Angeles and both California YIMBY and YIMBY Action — the movement’s two flagship advocacy groups.

The split between pro-housing groups lies in whether California should keep building outward onto undeveloped land or promote construction in urban centers. Some supporters, including Oakland Democratic Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, have said the state needs all types of housing.

Others say building away from urban centers would make it harder to address climate change.

“We believe we can (and must) solve the housing and climate crises simultaneously. That means building communities with denser housing and alternatives to automobile dependence,” wrote Max Dubler of California YIMBY in a blog post explaining the group’s neutral stance on Prop. 45.

Public agencies and local governments that could benefit from the building rules were also divided.

The California Municipal Utilities Association opposes the measure. But most other groups representing local governments, including the League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties, remained neutral.

Financial impacts for Prop. 45

Prop. 45 supporters argued that streamlining development would make life more affordable for Californians, but the long-term financial benefits are unclear.

An analysis by Blue Sky Consulting Group, commissioned by the California Chamber of Commerce, estimated the measure would produce $1.5 billion in savings and additional revenues for public agencies over 10 years that would reduce overall housing costs.

But the measure would initially cost local governments and public agencies more as they adjust to the measure’s rules, according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office, a nonpartisan adviser to the Legislature.

Democrats have done well in recent elections when they win young voters by a margin of at least 20 points. On Tuesday, they carried Gen Z — those under 30 — by nearly 50 points, according to exit polling.

It's a stunning shift from 2024, when the party lost critical ground with young people. Long seen as a part of the Democratic base, voters under 30 shifted right towards Donald Trump, motivated by his pledge to better their economic prospects.

But this week, the youngest generation of voters issued a strong rebuke of Republicans, taking another chance on Democrats and their change-focused message at a moment when many of them feel as though the American Dream is out of reach.

How young voters powered Democrats to victory 

Americans ages 18-29 have a history of turning out at lower rates than older voters, and this year was no exception. Gen Z made up 11% of the total vote on Tuesday.

However, where young Americans may have made the greatest difference is on the margins in House and Senate races where Democrats flipped seats.

The Texas Senate race is a key example. Democrat James Talarico won the state by 12 percentage points; however, when looking at just Gen Z, he won it by 60 points.

Explaining the massive shift from 2024

When assessing gains more broadly, Democrats argue the party's strong slate of candidates helped drum up increased enthusiasm.

But another motivating factor remains strong opposition to Trump. Throughout his second term, Gen Z increasingly soured on the president, with some arguing he failed to make good on a number of core campaign promises — from pledging to lower prices and repeatedly vowing "no new wars," to calling for a crackdown on federal corruption and the release of the Epstein files.

Much of that disappointment was reflected in exit polling. Economic issues were the top concern for a plurality of 18- to 29-year-olds, at 43%, and these voters expressed broad frustrations with Trump's handling of the issue. More than eight in 10 said that Trump's policies have worsened economic conditions, with similar shares opposing his tariff strategy and the decision to go to war with Iran.

The young voters Trump lost

Early analysis from CIRCLE indicates that 15% of young people who backed Trump in 2024 voted for a Democratic House candidate in this year's midterms.

Democrats made gains with some young voters who backed Trump two years ago, including white men and Latino men, two blocs that narrowly voted Republican in 2024 and then voted blue on Tuesday by double digits. Democratic candidates also narrowed the margins with young rural voters and people without college degrees.  

Some of those gains may have been helped by young Trump voters who chose to sit this election out, but it's unclear how many of them there were.

How the election results broke down by age

The midterm results underscore how neither of the two major parties owns Gen Z, according to John Della Volpe, a left-leaning pollster who's extensively studied the politics of young Americans.

"The cohort of younger people in this cycle had a different set of experiences than the cohort of people two years ago, or four years before that," he said. "Every candidate, every party has to earn their votes."

Della Volpe, who runs the Harvard Youth Poll, notes that in the latest survey, released in October, there was a sizable enthusiasm gap between young Democrat and young Republican respondents. While half of Democrats said they definitely planned to vote, just a third of Republicans and less than a quarter of Independents said the same.

"I also think we shouldn't overread what's happened," he added. "Clearly a significant historic rebuke on the party in office — that's obvious — however, I think we need to more fully, kind of understand, the contour of the electorate, who showed up and who didn't show up."

By 2028, Gen Z and millennial voters will make up more than half of the electorate, a demographic shift with huge implications for Democrats and the GOP.

"Young adults can make a difference," said Elizabeth Matto, who serves as the director of the Center for Youth Political Participation at Rutgers University.

"They do care about politics. They can sway the outcome of elections. And they're a voting bloc worth paying attention to."
Copyright 2026 NPR

The morning after Tuesday's midterms was gloomy and rainy in Minneapolis, but people still gathered at the place where Border Patrol agents shot and killed Alex Pretti, a VA nurse and U.S. citizen, last January. All week, community members have come here to place their "I Voted" stickers at the memorial.

Nicki Adams, who dated Pretti and was his close friend for nearly 17 years, watched quietly as a woman added her sticker to a street lamp completely covered in the red decals.

"I wanted to see all the stickers. I just wanted to be here," she says. "It just means a lot to me. I think it would mean a lot to Alex, too."

A few blocks away, people left their stickers where an ICE officer killed Renee Good, a mom of three and a U.S. citizen, just a few weeks before Pretti's death. In Houston, they left them where an ICE officer killed Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, a father of three and a Mexican immigrant, in July.

Adams says these stickers, and the election results this week, send a clear message to Congress: "You work for us, and please carry on these values that we care about … We want to be seen and heard and taken care of and have our neighbors taken care of."

The deaths of Pretti and Good during the ICE surge in Minneapolis marked a pivotal moment for the country, sparking intense public backlash to President Trump's aggressive deportation efforts. But federal law enforcement officials have given little indication they're progressing in investigating their deaths, or the deaths of at least seven other people killed by federal immigration agents since Trump took office again last year. DHS did not respond to an NPR request for the status of those investigations.

Now, after Democrats' sweeping wins this week, their deaths at the hands of immigration agents will likely be the targets of renewed investigations. With a majority in Congress, Democrats can issue subpoenas to the major players in Trump's mass deportation plan, compelling them to testify under oath before the legislature.

That could include White House Border Czar Tom Homan, former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, former Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino, and White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, among others.

Congress can also demand internal documents, like use-of-force reports.

"They can dissect these individual shootings, and really unravel the story of what happened," says Naureen Shah, who leads the ACLU's immigration policy work.

Democrats have already held shadow hearings on the ICE shootings, during which they've called in family members and witnesses to testify.

But Shah says now Congress can ask key questions of top decision makers: What orders were given to immigration officers in the field? What was training like for these officers?

Who made the decision to paint Good and Pretti as threats, including calling Pretti a "would-be assassin" and a domestic terrorist, when video showed otherwise?

"It's like we can turn the faucet on and actually find out so much more," Shah says. "There's an aspect of this that is really about a kind of reckoning with how it's possible that things that seemed unthinkable could happen on American streets. How do you have that reckoning if you don't actually have the ability to force people to explain themselves?"

Democratic leaders have already said that's the plan.

Maryland Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin, who is expected to lead the House Judiciary Committee, told NPR in a statement that Congress will use "every tool" at its disposal to investigate ICE and that it is time for the agency to "start answering to the American people."

California Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia, expected to lead the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, vowed to take on DHS and ICE abuses in a two-word statement: "Lawyer Up."

Mississippi Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson, expected to lead the House Committee on Homeland Security, sent a letter on Wednesday to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, demanding the agency "comply with all document preservation requirements."

Illinois Democratic Rep. Delia Ramirez wrote on social media that Noem, Miller, Homan, Bovino and Mullin should "clear" their schedules.

In response to that, DHS general counsel James Percival said Democrats are "more interested in political shenanigans than in governing" but said the agency is prepared to "deal with this nonsense."

There are key limitations to what Democrats in Congress can do with their majority when it comes to ICE accountability, says Rachel Moran, a professor at the University of St. Thomas School of Law.

Major changes, like clawing back funding for the agency, would require a veto-proof majority, something the Democrats don't have.

"You still have a president who has shown a complete lack of interest in accountability for federal agents and in fact, a great deal of knee jerk defensiveness about their conduct," Moran says.

In a statement, a White House spokesperson told NPR "if Democrats choose to pursue sham investigations and radical left policies, they are choosing to work against the American people."

Democrats, the statement added, "should be reminded that we still control the federal government and all of its powers."

But that's not true. Congress has its own powers, one of them being the ability to compel testimony. Moran says a deeper probe into the shootings could still serve important purposes, like making evidence available for states to use in their own criminal investigations.

Minnesota officials, for instance, have been fighting with the federal government to get evidence related to the Pretti and Good killings.

Brent Ganger, Renee Good's brother, says learning more information about his sister's death will be hard to hear, "but I think it's also super important for us to understand what happened that day. I don't want history to keep repeating itself."

It was painful, he says, to watch immigration agents kill more people after his sister. He thought her death would be a turning point. In a way, it might have been the start of one. After the surge in Minneapolis, most Americans said ICE had gone too far.

Ganger, who considers himself a moderate, was happy to see the Blue Wave this week. On election night, he was scrolling Instagram when he saw a photo of his sister's memorial site, with all the "I Voted" stickers.

"I was very grateful to see the repudiation of this administration from the country. It felt very supportive of my entire family," he says.

The next morning, in his home in Colorado, he got up and made biscuits and gravy, his sister's favorite breakfast.
Copyright 2026 NPR

Abraham Zavala was born at Adventist White Memorial. So were his kids. So late Friday, when he heard federal immigration agents were at the Boyle Heights hospital, and that local youth were out blowing whistles to warn neighbors, he went. 

“To me that’s sacred ground,” said Zavala, an organizer with Unión del Barrio.

“I’m a dad,” he said. “I wanted to be there to support the youth.”

He was among the Boyle Heights residents who converged on the hospital and stayed in a standoff with federal immigration agents into the early hours of Saturday. Agents detained at least two people, according to rapid response groups.

Neighbors alerted each other with noisemakers and fireworks. A woman pounded her pots and pans. Teenagers ran across Mariachi Plaza, shouting that ICE was in the area and urging residents to lock their doors. 

“Even though we’re afraid, you know we’re still showing up,” said Myra Vasquez, a Boyle Heights resident who rushed to White Memorial after hearing reports of ICE in the area. “We’re not going to allow them to just come into our communities and terrorize us because they’re the real terrorists causing harm.”

Myra Vasquez, a Boyle Heights resident and co-owner of Espacio 1839 rushed to White Memorial after hearing reports of ICE.

(

Alejandra Molina

/

Boyle Heights Beat

)

The confrontation peaked around 11:30 p.m. Video shared with Boyle Heights Beat shows agents pushing back protesters who had moved toward them, and the two sides begin shoving. Agents appear to pepper-spray people on the sidewalk. One agent then tackles a man and pins him to the ground, while a second person is pulled from the crowd. Both were detained.

The standoff continued past midnight. Zavala said agents got out of their vehicles and formed a line in front of the parking lot where paramedics enter, blocking an emergency exit. “They literally became White Memorial’s private security detail,” he said. Zavala said he and another person were sprayed with Mace.

Adventist Health White Memorial Hospital in Boyle Heights.

(

Steve Saldivar

/

The LA Local

)

The Dept. of Homeland Security declined to comment about the incident in Boyle Heights, and, in a statement, the agency said they would “not disclose or discuss law enforcement operations.”

The spokesperson instead said that obstructing law enforcement is a federal crime.

“ICE does not target hospitals, schools, or churches,” the statement said, despite the large turnout of protesters who encountered the masked agents at the hospital.

Father Brendan Busse, who pastors nearby Dolores Mission Church in Boyle Heights, rushed to White Memorial after seeing reports from the Boyle Heights Immigrant Rights Network of ICE at the hospital.

Busse, a Jesuit priest, said he witnessed people caring for each other and tending to those suffering from pepper spray. People there advocated for them to find treatment at White Memorial, Busse said. Community members, he said, “were obviously doing their best, not just to communicate their feelings, but to push, to instigate the dispersal of this ICE presence.”

As clergy, Busse said their presence can help combat a narrative of those advocating for immigrants as “somehow dangerous, or violent, or vulgar.” 

“Just to be there is a sign that that’s not the only version of what this looks like,” he said.

Initially, Busse showed up wearing a hoodie, but he decided to change into his green stole he had in his car as things appeared to get tense. “Just try to do what I could to bring a presence of maybe a little moral authority,” he said.

“It’s bad enough that people have to lift up their voices to say something so obvious, that their lives matter, that our communities are sacred, that families belong together,” Busse said. “It’s bad enough that they have to be out at 3 a.m. in the morning to tell anybody that.”

“It’s even worse if they would have to suffer the consequences of retribution and violence that comes from speaking out in that way,” Busse added.

The post Fireworks, whistles, pots and pans: How neighbors came together to push ICE out of Boyle Heights appeared first on LA Local.