Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Newsom points to tariffs and rising costs
    A man stands at a podium, speaking into a microphone with his left arm outstretched, wearing a dark suit. Behind him is an American flag, a California flag and the seal of the state of California. Beside him is a television monitor that reads, "-$16B our state revenues. Trump slump 2025-2026 estimated reduction."
    Gov. Gavin Newsom addresses the media during a press conference unveiling his revised 2025-26 budget proposal at the Capitol Annex Swing Space in Sacramento on May 13, 2025.

    Topline:

    Gov. Gavin Newsom today announced that California is facing a $12 billion budget deficit, spurred by soaring costs for social services as the state’s economy teeters from President Donald Trump’s chaotic tariffs strategy.

    "Trump Slump": Unveiling his revised $322 billion spending plan, Newsom repeatedly blamed the tariffs for undermining key industries and eroding financial markets that are crucial to California’s fiscal health — a “Trump slump” that he forecasts will reduce tax revenues by $16 billion next year. But the size of Newsom’s budget proposal remains virtually unchanged from an earlier version in January, when the governor projected a modest surplus, underscoring that runaway expenses for subsidized health care and other state programs are the biggest long-term challenges.

    Closing the deficit: Newsom is proposing to close the deficit by rolling back state-funded insurance coverage for adults without legal immigration status, cutting coverage for weight loss drugs like Ozempic and reducing home health services, as well as sweeping billions of dollars out of specialty funds to backfill core services.

    Read on . . . for more on Newsom's plan to close the deficit and next steps for the governor's proposed budget.

    California budget is $12 billion in the red amid Trump tariffs and rising costsBy Alexei Koseff, CalMatters

    Gov. Gavin Newsom addresses the media during a press conference unveiling his revised 2025-26 budget proposal at the Capitol Annex Swing Space in Sacramento on May 13, 2025. Photo by Fred Greaves for CalMatters This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom today announced that California is facing a $12 billion budget deficit, spurred by soaring costs for social services as the state’s economy teeters from President Donald Trump’s chaotic tariffs strategy.

    Unveiling his revised $322 billion spending plan, Newsom repeatedly blamed the tariffs for undermining key industries and eroding financial markets that are crucial to California’s fiscal health — a “Trump slump” that he forecasts will reduce tax revenues by $16 billion next year.

    “California is under assault, the United States of America in many respects is under assault, because we have a president that’s been reckless in terms of assaulting those growth engines and has created a climate of deep uncertainty,” Newsom said. “The impacts are being felt disproportionately in the fourth-largest economy in the world.”

    But the size of Newsom’s budget proposal remains virtually unchanged from an earlier version in January, when the governor projected a modest surplus, underscoring that runaway expenses for subsidized health care and other state programs are the biggest long-term challenges.

    Newsom is proposing to close the deficit by rolling back state-funded insurance coverage for adults without legal immigration status, cutting coverage for weight loss drugs like Ozempic and reducing home health services, as well as sweeping billions of dollars out of speciality funds to backfill core services.

    “We’ve got a spending problem,” Newsom acknowledged, defending the potential cuts against anticipated blowback. “We can deny that we have a shortfall. We can deny that we have a deficit. We can deny we have a problem in the system and we could put it off and be irresponsible.”

    His approach will force hard conversations about priorities with the state Legislature as they race to reach a budget deal before the start of the fiscal year in July. Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire of Santa Rosa and Senate Budget Chairperson Scott Wiener of San Francisco, both Democrats, gave only a tepid initial response, saying in a joint statement that they “remain focused and prepared to protect the people and progress we’ve made over the years.”

    Gov. Gavin Newsom addresses the media during a press conference unveiling his revised 2025-26 budget proposal at the Capitol Annex Swing Space in Sacramento on May 13, 2025. Photo by Fred Greaves for CalMatters California’s financial picture was troubled even before the recent turmoil. Newsom and the Legislature took extraordinary steps last summer to close a budget gap projected in the tens of billions of dollars over two years, including more than $28 billion in 2025-26.

    The $12 billion deficit in Newsom’s revised budget proposal represents an additional shortfall after state officials agreed last year to sweeping cuts to state agencies and positions, clawing back funding increases for health care providers, eliminating affordable housing programs, delaying money for schools, suspending business tax credits and dipping into reserves.

    Newsom seeks major cuts to Medi-Cal

    Medi-Cal, the state’s health insurance program for low-income people, has reported a more than $6 billion cost overrun this year — in part because an expansion to include immigrants without legal status brought in more new enrollees than expected — and it needed an emergency cash infusion in March.

    That program is targeted for major reductions in Newsom’s budget proposal: a freeze on new enrollment of adults who are in the country illegally, as well as a $100 monthly premium and cuts to long-term care and dental benefits for those who maintain their coverage. The governor estimates those moves could eventually save more than $6 billion annually.

    The governor is also proposing to undo a recent rule eliminating asset tests for seniors, a factor that state analysts found has contributed to a 40% growth in senior Medi-Cal enrollment over the past four years.

    His plan would borrow billions of dollars from a special fund intended to raise reimbursement rates for Medi-Cal providers and shift more than $1.5 billion out of a fund intended for projects to reduce greenhouse gases to pay for the state’s firefighting operations.

    Newsom is also looking to save money by closing another state prison, a cut made possible because California’s incarcerated population has declined by nearly half, to 91,000 people, in the past two decades. It would be the fifth state prison to close during his administration, though Newsom did not specify which one.

    The devastating fires that hit Los Angeles in January have introduced new uncertainty for the budget, because the tax deadline for Los Angeles County — where a quarter of all Californians live — was delayed until October.

    But the most significant risk to tax receipts is undoubtedly from Trump’s tariffs, which Newsom sued last month to block. Stock market declines are poised to take a bite out of future income tax revenue, because California relies disproportionately on capital gains earned by the wealthiest taxpayers; that accounts for $10 billion of the projected revenue decline. Higher costs from the tariffs are also imperiling major sectors such as manufacturing, agriculture, tourism and shipping in California, whose largest trading partner is China.

    Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher of Chico called Newsom pinning California’s latest budget woes on the tariffs “the biggest load of crap I’ve ever seen from a politician.” Gallagher said in a statement, “We’re in this mess because of his reckless spending, false promises, and failed leadership.”

    Next step: Negotiating with lawmakers

    Bargaining with legislative leaders will ramp up over the next month, with a June 15 deadline for the Legislature to pass a balanced budget or forgo its pay, though sometimes provisions of an overall deal drag out beyond that.

    “Anyone who thinks we’re not going to make cuts this year is not in touch with reality,” Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel, an Encino Democrat who leads the Assembly budget committee, told CalMatters. “Advocates who are proposing major expansions of programs should stop wasting people’s time.”

    California’s public universities, however, saw a rosier forecast in the budget announcement — cuts of 3%, far below the initial 7.95% cuts Newsom proposed in January. Lawmakers this year rallied to spare the University of California and California State University from the original, deeper cuts.

    That still means $130 million less for UC and $144 million less for CSU, which is particularly reliant on state funding and says it faces larger class sizes, fewer course options and likely layoffs as a result.

    Another spending proposal was spared: a $420 million annual increase of California’s film and television tax credit, more than doubling the pot of available subsidies and boosting the amount that individual productions can receive. It’s a priority for Newsom, with the strong backing of many Los Angeles-area legislators, especially as the region seeks a comeback after the fires.

    “I want to get the economy moving again,” Newsom said. “Revenue doesn’t come from trees, it doesn’t come from printing presses.”

    Trump’s effort to slash federal spending is another looming question mark. Congressional Republicans have floated shifting more of the cost of social safety net programs to the states, though they are struggling to reach a budget agreement.

    If they ultimately push through major changes to federal funding, lawmakers could be back in Sacramento later this year or early next year revising the state budget once again.

    “Ninety percent of the ball game is in Washington,” Gabriel said. “It’s frustrating to me that this is beyond our control.”

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • 4 people face felony charges in alleged NYE plot
    A man in a blue suit with a red tie speaks at a podium, holding up one hand and pinching two fingers together. A man in a grey suit with a red tie and another man wearing a police uniform stand behind him.
    Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli (center) speaks at a press conference Oct. 8 in Los Angeles.

    Topline:

    A federal grand jury Tuesday returned a six-count indictment against four members of a group described as “far-left, anti-capitalist and anti-government” that allegedly plotted to set off bombs in Southern California on New Year’s Eve.

    The details: According to the indictment, the defendants are part of the Turtle Island Liberation Front, or TILF.

    In November, one of the members allegedly drafted an eight-page, handwritten document titled “Operation Midnight Sun” that described a bombing plot targeting technology and logistics companies across Southern California on New Year’s Eve, according to prosecutors.

    Another group member is accused of sending two others a message that read: “death to israel death to the usa death to colonizers death to settler-coloniasm [sic].”

    Other targets: The defendants also planned to target U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and vehicles with firearms and pipe bombs to “take some of them out and scare the rest of them,” according to the indictment.

    The defendants:

    • Audrey Illeene Carroll, 30, a.k.a. “Asiginaak,” and “Black Moon,” of South Los Angeles;
    • Zachary Aaron Page, 32, a.k.a. “AK,” “Ash Kerrigan,” and “Cthulu’s Daughter,” of Torrance;
    • Dante James Anthony-Gaffield, 24, a.k.a. “Nomad,” of South Los Angeles; and
    • Tina Lai, 41, a.k.a. “Kickwhere,” of Glendale.

    All are being held in federal custody without bond. Each is charged with one count of providing and attempting to provide material support to terrorists and one count of possession of unregistered firearms.

    If convicted, Carroll and Page could be sentenced to life in federal prison. Gaffield and Lai would face at least 25 years in federal prison.

    Reached for comment, an attorney for Lai said only that she would plead not guilty to the charges early next month. Attorneys for Carroll and Gaffield did not immediately respond to emailed requests for comment.

    LAist was not immediately able to identify an attorney for Page.

    What’s next: Arraignment is set for Jan. 5 in U.S. District Court.

  • Sponsored message
  • Grand Jury slams the 25% salary hike in report
    A seal with mountains, rows of farm land, and oranges with the words "County of Orange California" surrounding the scene. The seal hangs on a wooden wall with words inscribed "In God We Trust." At the bottom right of frame there are the ends of three flags.
    In June, the O.C. Board of Supervisors approved a 25% pay hike, increasing their salaries by about $49,000.

    Topline:

    The Orange County Grand Jury released a scathing report Monday that accused the county supervisors of undermining the public’s trust when they granted themselves a 25% pay increase.

    Background: The Orange County Board of Supervisors approved a 25% pay hike in June 2025, raising their salaries to a level higher than that of the California governor. Previously, supervisors were set to earn 80% of a Superior Court judge’s salary, but the board voted to change that to 100% match a judge’s salary. With the pay hike, they now make at least $244,000.

    Why it matters: The pay hike came just after former Supervisor Andrew Do was sentenced to five years in federal prison. Do pleaded guilty to a felony bribery charge in October 2024 for accepting more than $550,000 in bribes. The county itself is also financially in hot water following the Airport Fire, which has racked up hundreds of millions of dollars in damage claims against the county.

    Read on … for more on the Grand Jury’s findings.

    The Orange County Board of Supervisors “undermined” the public’s trust when they granted themselves a 25% pay increase, according to the latest OC Grand Jury report released on Monday.

    Since 2005, supervisors were set to make 80% of a Superior Court judge’s salary. That changed in June, when the board approved a 25% pay hike, increasing their salaries by about $49,000 to at least $244,000.

    The pay increase raised eyebrows over the summer, sparking the Grand Jury investigation. A Grand Jury is a panel of citizens who investigate local government and public agencies. Members serve one year and look into several issues during that time.

    It came just weeks after former Supervisor Andrew Do was sentenced to five years in federal prison for accepting more than $550,000 in bribes. The county itself is also financially in hot water following the Airport Fire, which has racked up hundreds of millions of dollars in damage claims against the county.

    “The timing was especially troubling as the County of Orange (County) has been facing hiring freezes and budget constraints,” the Grand Jury reported. “This decision was not only tone-deaf — it reflected a deeper disconnect from the Board’s duty to serve the public with transparency and fiscal responsibility.”

    What does the Grand Jury say? 

    The Grand Jury questioned how the item was presented to the public and whether it was purposefully buried within the county budget agenda item.

    “The Board added their salary increase into the $10.8 billion 2025-2026 Orange County Annual Budget adoption process. This resulted in a minimal description in the agenda and minimal opportunity for citizen input,” the Grand Jury reported. “Therefore, the Grand Jury investigated: why did they want to conceal their salary increase, was it warranted at this time and who initiated it?”

    The board’s vote, the Grand Jury stated, signifies that the board prioritizes personal gain over accountability and public trust.

    “Elected officials are entrusted to serve, not to enrich themselves. When this happens, the foundation of representative democracy is undermined,” the Grand Jury said. “The people of Orange County deserve better, and the people must demand it.”

    How are officials responding? 

    OC Supervisor Katrina Foley — the lone dissenting vote on the raises — said she was not surprised by the Grand Jury’s findings.

    “I think most people felt that it was poor form for that to happen at that time, and given our current economic instability due to what's happening at the federal and the state level,” Foley told LAist.

    Following the criticism, Supervisors Vicente Sarmiento and Doug Chaffee said they would donate their increased pay to charity.

    “I am open to considering the recommendations in the report for changes to the pay ordinance and how future increases are approved, and I have been open to reconsidering the pay increase,” Sarmiento said in a statement.

    A county spokesperson and Supervisor Don Wagner declined to comment. Supervisor Doug Chaffee and Janet Nguyen did not respond to LAist’s request for comment.

    What’s next? 

    The report made a handful of recommendations, including that the board rescind the pay raise and salary changes by next March “to restore institutional trust and demonstrate a genuine commitment to transparency and accountability.”

    It also recommends that the board adopt procedures for proposing, reviewing and approving future supervisor salary changes that include public hearings.

    The county has 90 days from the release of the report to respond to the Grand Jury, according to a county spokesperson.

  • Nonprofit offers private catering training
    Ten people sit in a classroom. They look at a person standing, pointing to an image on a screen.
    The Hire a Vendor program trains street vendors to become caterers. The program is led by Inclusive Action for the City.

    Topline:

    To protect street vendors from ICE, L.A. non profit Inclusive Action for the City ramped up caterer training in 2025 to help vendors move their businesses off the streets. The group says it led to nearly 400 catering jobs — and it now wants to double the program in 2026.

    Why it matters: The increase of immigration sweeps has led many Southern California families to lose income. The training moves street vendors away from public settings to private events where there is little risk of being swept up in an ICE raid.

    Why now: Inclusive Action of the City trained 34 street vendors in catering practices and wants to expand that in 2026 by adding another full-time worker to the program.

    The backstory: The group’s effort is part of a number of actions taken by individuals and groups across the region to help people targeted for detention keep sources of income.

    What's next: Federal immigration sweeps continue in Southern California, leading to uncertainty among many families with a member who does not have the authorization to be in the U.S.

    Go deeper: LA group gives street vendors $500 grants to help during immigration sweeps.

    The increase of federal immigration sweeps in Southern California this year made one thing clear to street vendors without authorization to be in the U.S. — running a business outside was risky.

    In response, L.A. nonprofit Inclusive Action for the City ramped up an existing program that trains street vendors to work in private catering.

    “One of the big successes of the year was the growth of our Hire a Vendor program, where our business coaches essentially became brokers for our street vendors and other entrepreneurs so they can get catering jobs,” said Rudy Espinoza, the group’s CEO.

    The program was created in 2024 but the group expanded it this year after the increase of immigration sweeps. The group said in its annual report that 34 small businesses were trained for catering this year and more than 350 catering jobs came to those trainees this year.

    A person sits at a desk with others around him. The person wears a baseball cap and a red sweatshirt.
    The training program includes menu design and pricing, electronic sales systems and marketing
    (
    Courtesy Inclusive Action for the City
    )

    “Everywhere from the mayor's house to a small backyard party,” Espinoza said.

    The group’s effort is part of actions taken by individuals and groups across the region to help people targeted for detention keep sources of income.

    That help has included buyouts of daily inventory of fruit and flowers, as well as the awarding of grants to street vendors who lost income because they stayed home.

    The program is just an example of how some entrepreneurs really dedicated themselves to build out a different line of business.
    — Rudy Espinoza, CEO of Inclusive Action for the City

    Advocates said the loss of income through detentions — many carried out through violent means — often affected family members who were U.S. citizens and has created a humanitarian crisis as families have lost the means to pay bills and buy food.

    People sit at desks looking forward toward a screen. They all have black hair.
    Street vendors in a Hire a Vendor session organized by Inclusive Action for the City.
    (
    Courtesy Inclusive Action for the City
    )

    The vendor training program sought to alleviate that.

    “Sometimes, challenges force us to think, be creative and think about how to adapt,” Espinoza said. “The Hire a Vendor program is just an example of how some entrepreneurs really dedicated themselves to build out a different line of business for themselves.”

    How it works

    The Hire a Vendor program is free to people who seek and receive micro-loans from Inclusive Action for the City.

    Four of the program’s nine sessions are "office hours" in which a business coach works one-on-one with the business owner.

    The trainings cover:

    • Catering basics such as delivery, set-up and presentation
    • Invoicing and electronic sale systems
    • Menu design and pricing
    • Marketing through social media

    The trained vendors are free to pursue their own catering jobs but also get catering work through a portal created by Inclusive Action for the City.

    Espinoza said one full-time employee oversaw the program this year, and he’d like to add another full-time worker to expand the trainings in 2026.

  • Borrowers in default may see wages garnished

    Topline:

    The Trump administration will resume garnishing wages from student loan borrowers in default in early 2026, the U.S. Education Department confirmed to NPR.

    The context: "We expect the first notices to be sent to approximately 1,000 defaulted borrowers the week of Jan. 7," a department spokesperson told NPR. The spokesperson said wage-garnishment notices are expected to increase on a monthly basis throughout the year.

    The background: The move comes after a years-long pause in wage garnishment due to the pandemic.

    Who is affected? A borrower is in default when they have not made loan payments in more than 270 days. Once that happens, the federal government can try to collect on the debt by seizing tax refunds and Social Security benefits and also by ordering an employer to withhold up to 15% of a borrower's pay. Borrowers should receive a 30-day notice from the Education Department before this wage garnishment begins.

    Read on ... for more on the coming changes.

    The Trump administration will resume garnishing wages from student loan borrowers in default in early 2026, the U.S. Education Department confirmed to NPR.

    The move comes after a years-long pause in wage garnishment due to the pandemic.

    "We expect the first notices to be sent to approximately 1,000 defaulted borrowers the week of Jan. 7," a department spokesperson told NPR. The spokesperson said wage-garnishment notices are expected to increase on a monthly basis throughout the year.

    A borrower is in default when they have not made loan payments in more than 270 days. Once that happens, the federal government can try to collect on the debt by seizing tax refunds and Social Security benefits and also by ordering an employer to withhold up to 15% of a borrower's pay. Borrowers should receive a 30-day notice from the Education Department before this wage garnishment begins.

    Betsy Mayotte, the president and founder of The Institute of Student Loan Advisors, says even though borrowers have expected this, the timing is unfortunate.

    "It will coincide with the increase in health care costs for many of these defaulted borrowers," she said, referring to the premium increases for Affordable Care Act health insurance that kick in in 2026. "The two will almost certainly put significant economic strain on low- and middle-income borrowers."

    About 5.5 million borrowers currently are in default, according to a recent analysis of the latest federal student loan data published by the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a public policy think tank.

    Another 3.7 million are more than 270 days late on their payments and 2.7 million are in the early stages of delinquency.

    "We've got about 12 million borrowers right now who are either delinquent on their loans or in default," Preston Cooper, who studies student loan policy at AEI, told NPR.

    That's more than 1 in 4 federal student loan borrowers.

    Cory Turner contributed to this story.

    Copyright 2025 NPR