Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Newsom points to tariffs and rising costs
    A man stands at a podium, speaking into a microphone with his left arm outstretched, wearing a dark suit. Behind him is an American flag, a California flag and the seal of the state of California. Beside him is a television monitor that reads, "-$16B our state revenues. Trump slump 2025-2026 estimated reduction."
    Gov. Gavin Newsom addresses the media during a press conference unveiling his revised 2025-26 budget proposal at the Capitol Annex Swing Space in Sacramento on May 13, 2025.

    Topline:

    Gov. Gavin Newsom today announced that California is facing a $12 billion budget deficit, spurred by soaring costs for social services as the state’s economy teeters from President Donald Trump’s chaotic tariffs strategy.

    "Trump Slump": Unveiling his revised $322 billion spending plan, Newsom repeatedly blamed the tariffs for undermining key industries and eroding financial markets that are crucial to California’s fiscal health — a “Trump slump” that he forecasts will reduce tax revenues by $16 billion next year. But the size of Newsom’s budget proposal remains virtually unchanged from an earlier version in January, when the governor projected a modest surplus, underscoring that runaway expenses for subsidized health care and other state programs are the biggest long-term challenges.

    Closing the deficit: Newsom is proposing to close the deficit by rolling back state-funded insurance coverage for adults without legal immigration status, cutting coverage for weight loss drugs like Ozempic and reducing home health services, as well as sweeping billions of dollars out of specialty funds to backfill core services.

    Read on . . . for more on Newsom's plan to close the deficit and next steps for the governor's proposed budget.

    California budget is $12 billion in the red amid Trump tariffs and rising costsBy Alexei Koseff, CalMatters

    Gov. Gavin Newsom addresses the media during a press conference unveiling his revised 2025-26 budget proposal at the Capitol Annex Swing Space in Sacramento on May 13, 2025. Photo by Fred Greaves for CalMatters This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom today announced that California is facing a $12 billion budget deficit, spurred by soaring costs for social services as the state’s economy teeters from President Donald Trump’s chaotic tariffs strategy.

    Unveiling his revised $322 billion spending plan, Newsom repeatedly blamed the tariffs for undermining key industries and eroding financial markets that are crucial to California’s fiscal health — a “Trump slump” that he forecasts will reduce tax revenues by $16 billion next year.

    “California is under assault, the United States of America in many respects is under assault, because we have a president that’s been reckless in terms of assaulting those growth engines and has created a climate of deep uncertainty,” Newsom said. “The impacts are being felt disproportionately in the fourth-largest economy in the world.”

    But the size of Newsom’s budget proposal remains virtually unchanged from an earlier version in January, when the governor projected a modest surplus, underscoring that runaway expenses for subsidized health care and other state programs are the biggest long-term challenges.

    Newsom is proposing to close the deficit by rolling back state-funded insurance coverage for adults without legal immigration status, cutting coverage for weight loss drugs like Ozempic and reducing home health services, as well as sweeping billions of dollars out of speciality funds to backfill core services.

    “We’ve got a spending problem,” Newsom acknowledged, defending the potential cuts against anticipated blowback. “We can deny that we have a shortfall. We can deny that we have a deficit. We can deny we have a problem in the system and we could put it off and be irresponsible.”

    His approach will force hard conversations about priorities with the state Legislature as they race to reach a budget deal before the start of the fiscal year in July. Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire of Santa Rosa and Senate Budget Chairperson Scott Wiener of San Francisco, both Democrats, gave only a tepid initial response, saying in a joint statement that they “remain focused and prepared to protect the people and progress we’ve made over the years.”

    Gov. Gavin Newsom addresses the media during a press conference unveiling his revised 2025-26 budget proposal at the Capitol Annex Swing Space in Sacramento on May 13, 2025. Photo by Fred Greaves for CalMatters California’s financial picture was troubled even before the recent turmoil. Newsom and the Legislature took extraordinary steps last summer to close a budget gap projected in the tens of billions of dollars over two years, including more than $28 billion in 2025-26.

    The $12 billion deficit in Newsom’s revised budget proposal represents an additional shortfall after state officials agreed last year to sweeping cuts to state agencies and positions, clawing back funding increases for health care providers, eliminating affordable housing programs, delaying money for schools, suspending business tax credits and dipping into reserves.

    Newsom seeks major cuts to Medi-Cal

    Medi-Cal, the state’s health insurance program for low-income people, has reported a more than $6 billion cost overrun this year — in part because an expansion to include immigrants without legal status brought in more new enrollees than expected — and it needed an emergency cash infusion in March.

    That program is targeted for major reductions in Newsom’s budget proposal: a freeze on new enrollment of adults who are in the country illegally, as well as a $100 monthly premium and cuts to long-term care and dental benefits for those who maintain their coverage. The governor estimates those moves could eventually save more than $6 billion annually.

    The governor is also proposing to undo a recent rule eliminating asset tests for seniors, a factor that state analysts found has contributed to a 40% growth in senior Medi-Cal enrollment over the past four years.

    His plan would borrow billions of dollars from a special fund intended to raise reimbursement rates for Medi-Cal providers and shift more than $1.5 billion out of a fund intended for projects to reduce greenhouse gases to pay for the state’s firefighting operations.

    Newsom is also looking to save money by closing another state prison, a cut made possible because California’s incarcerated population has declined by nearly half, to 91,000 people, in the past two decades. It would be the fifth state prison to close during his administration, though Newsom did not specify which one.

    The devastating fires that hit Los Angeles in January have introduced new uncertainty for the budget, because the tax deadline for Los Angeles County — where a quarter of all Californians live — was delayed until October.

    But the most significant risk to tax receipts is undoubtedly from Trump’s tariffs, which Newsom sued last month to block. Stock market declines are poised to take a bite out of future income tax revenue, because California relies disproportionately on capital gains earned by the wealthiest taxpayers; that accounts for $10 billion of the projected revenue decline. Higher costs from the tariffs are also imperiling major sectors such as manufacturing, agriculture, tourism and shipping in California, whose largest trading partner is China.

    Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher of Chico called Newsom pinning California’s latest budget woes on the tariffs “the biggest load of crap I’ve ever seen from a politician.” Gallagher said in a statement, “We’re in this mess because of his reckless spending, false promises, and failed leadership.”

    Next step: Negotiating with lawmakers

    Bargaining with legislative leaders will ramp up over the next month, with a June 15 deadline for the Legislature to pass a balanced budget or forgo its pay, though sometimes provisions of an overall deal drag out beyond that.

    “Anyone who thinks we’re not going to make cuts this year is not in touch with reality,” Assemblymember Jesse Gabriel, an Encino Democrat who leads the Assembly budget committee, told CalMatters. “Advocates who are proposing major expansions of programs should stop wasting people’s time.”

    California’s public universities, however, saw a rosier forecast in the budget announcement — cuts of 3%, far below the initial 7.95% cuts Newsom proposed in January. Lawmakers this year rallied to spare the University of California and California State University from the original, deeper cuts.

    That still means $130 million less for UC and $144 million less for CSU, which is particularly reliant on state funding and says it faces larger class sizes, fewer course options and likely layoffs as a result.

    Another spending proposal was spared: a $420 million annual increase of California’s film and television tax credit, more than doubling the pot of available subsidies and boosting the amount that individual productions can receive. It’s a priority for Newsom, with the strong backing of many Los Angeles-area legislators, especially as the region seeks a comeback after the fires.

    “I want to get the economy moving again,” Newsom said. “Revenue doesn’t come from trees, it doesn’t come from printing presses.”

    Trump’s effort to slash federal spending is another looming question mark. Congressional Republicans have floated shifting more of the cost of social safety net programs to the states, though they are struggling to reach a budget agreement.

    If they ultimately push through major changes to federal funding, lawmakers could be back in Sacramento later this year or early next year revising the state budget once again.

    “Ninety percent of the ball game is in Washington,” Gabriel said. “It’s frustrating to me that this is beyond our control.”

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Thousands gather in downtown LA to protest Trump
    A teenage girl, surrounded by other teenagers, holds up a sign that says "We are skipping our lessons to teach u one."
    Thousands of students from schools across Los Angeles walked out Wednesday in peaceful protest of the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

    Topline:

    Thousands of students from schools across Los Angeles walked out Wednesday in peaceful protest of the Trump administration’s immigration policies. The Los Angeles Unified School District estimated 4,400 students from about two dozen schools participated.

    Student voices: 

    • “ I think it's really empowering that we aren't being discouraged to [protest], but it's also really dis-encouraging to have to live through this,” said Roybal Learning Center senior Melisa. 
    • “The reason I came out is 'cause we're so young and I feel like people always think that like young people don't have a voice and in reality we have one of the strongest voices,” said Jazlyn Garcia, a senior at  Alliance Gertz-Ressler High School. “I want people to go out and vote for midterms, pre-register to vote.”
    • “We need to protect our neighbors,” said Leonna, a senior at Downtown Magnets High School and daughter of immigrants from Cambodia.  “We need to protect the people that make sure that the economy is running and make sure that our lives are the way that they are every day.”

    Why now: Students say the Trump administration's immigration raids threaten their families, communities and education. Alexis, a senior at Brío College Prep, said administrators locked down his campus after agents detained a nearby fruit vendor. “He was a part of our community,” Alexis said. “He would always be out there selling fruits to us after school.”

    What's next: San Fernando Valley students at more than 40 schools plan to walk out Friday. “Los Angeles Unified supports the rights of our students to advocate for causes important to them,” a district spokesperson wrote in a statement to LAist. “However, we are concerned for student safety at off-campus demonstrations as schools are the safest place for students.” The district encouraged students to exercise their rights in on-campus discussions and demonstrations.

  • Sponsored message
  • More homes damaged by landslide could be eligible
    A broken mountain road. An orange cone to the right of frame.
    Land movement made a section of Narcissa Drive impassable in September 2024.

    Topline:

    Rancho Palos Verdes city officials announced Tuesday that five more homes ravaged by land movement could be eligible for a buyout. That’s because the city is set to receive around $10 million from a FEMA grant.

    How we got here: Land movement in the Portuguese Bend area has increased in Rancho Palos Verdes in recent years, triggered by above-average rainfall since 2022. Those landslides have left around 20 homes uninhabitable and forced dozens of people off the grid after being stripped of power, gas and internet services.

    About the grant: Any time a state of emergency is declared in a state, that state, in this case California, can apply for the Hazard Mitigation Grant from FEMA. Those funds are then allocated to cities, tribal agencies and other communities for projects that will help reduce the impact of disasters. The city has a buyout program underway for around 22 homes, also funded through a FEMA grant.

    What’s next: Rancho Palos Verdes has applied for additional federal funds to buy out homes in the area, with the goal of demolishing the structures and turning the lots into open space.

  • USC appoints its top lawyer, Beong-Soo Kim
    A man in a blue suit and with medium-light skin tone and East Asian features smiles for a portrait in front of a stately brick walkway.
    The University of Southern California board of trustees has appointed interim president Beong-Soo Kim to be its 13th president.

    Topline:

    The University of Southern California board of trustees has appointed interim president Beong-Soo Kim to be its 13th full president. Kim was named as the interim leader in February 2025 and began the role this summer.

    Who is he? Kim most recently served as USC’s senior vice president and general counsel and as a lecturer at the law school. Prior to joining USC, he worked at Kaiser Permanente and was a federal prosecutor for the Central District of California.

    What’s he stepping into? Kim succeeds Carol Folt, who was brought on to stabilize the university following a series of scandals under the administration before hers. She formally stepped down from her role in July, following criticism of her ability to handle student protests and concerns over fiscal stewardship.

    What’s happened under Kim’s interim presidency: USC faced a $200 million dollar deficit last fiscal year; Kim oversaw the layoffs of hundreds of employees since July.

    The University of Southern California board of trustees has appointed interim president Beong-Soo Kim to be its 13th full president.

    Kim was named as the interim leader in February 2025 and began the role this summer. He most recently served as USC’s senior vice president and general counsel, and as a lecturer at the law school. Prior to joining USC, he worked at Kaiser Permanente and was a federal prosecutor for the Central District of California.

    Kim succeeds Carol Folt, who was brought on to stabilize the university following a series of scandals under the administration before hers. She formally stepped down from her role in July, following criticism of her ability to handle student protests and concerns over fiscal stewardship.

    Soon after his term began, Kim oversaw the university’s effort to manage a $200 million deficit, which also led to hundreds of layoffs.

    “We did have to make some difficult decisions last year with respect to our budget and layoffs,” Kim told LAist. “And I'm really pleased that as a result of those difficult decisions, we're now in a much stronger financial position and really for a number of months have been really focusing on the opportunities that we see on the horizon.”

    In a call with LAist, and joined by USC board chair Suzanne Nora Johnson, Kim touched on bright spots and some of his priorities. He also touched on the relationship between USC and the Trump administration before a sudden ending to the call.

    This interview has been lightly edited for clarity.

    LAist: You've talked about addressing the mass layoffs and budget challenges. What do you see as the way forward?

    Beong-Soo Kim: Our research expenditures have actually been going up over the last year, over the last couple of years. We're focusing on: How do we provide the best possible educational value to our students? We're focusing on how to maintain and strengthen our academic culture of excellence, open dialogue and engagement with different viewpoints.

    And we're also really kind of leaning into artificial intelligence and asking questions as a community about how we incorporate AI responsibly into our education, into our operations, into our research. And there are obviously a lot of important ethical questions that we're working on, and it's really an quite an exciting time to be in the position that I'm in.

    What are you excited for?

    Well, a couple things that we're really looking forward to are, as part of the anniversary of the United States, we're going to be hosting a National Archives exhibition [of] founding documents in late April. We're also looking forward to helping host the L.A. Olympics in 2028. We have our 150th anniversary coming up in 2030 as a university.

    So there's a lot that's on the horizon. We also have the Lucas Museum opening up across the street later this year and, of course, George Lucas is one of our most beloved Trojan alumni. So there's so much vitality, so much energy on the campus right now.

    USC has, for the most part, avoided the sort of conflicts that the University of California system and elite private institutions across the country have had with the Trump administration. What can you share about how you plan to manage USC’s relationship with the federal government?

    Well, we really make an effort to engage with all levels of government, as well as foundations, the private sector, community groups. That kind of engagement is really more important nowadays. Universities can't just go off on their own. It's important for us to partner and find opportunities to work with others. And that's what we've been doing.

    And that's part of the reason why I think that our research has continued to go strongly. And I give a lot of the credit to our faculty and researchers who can continue submitting grant applications and continue to do research in areas that are critically important to the benefit of our community, our nation, and our world. And I think that we -—

    Suzanne Nora Johnson: —Actually I'm so sorry, but we have to complete the board meeting, and we've got to run. Thank you so much for your time. I really appreciate it. We'll be in touch. Bye. Thanks. Bye.

  • The city is appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court
    A line of people wait to vote on the right side of the image. On the left side of the image voting booths are shown with Orange County's logo and the words "Orange County Elections." An American flag hangs in the widow behind the people waiting in line.
    Voters wait to cast their ballots inside the Huntington Beach Central Library on Nov. 4, 2025.

    Topline:

    Huntington Beach will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review a decision striking down the city’s controversial voter ID law.

    What’s the backstory? Huntington Beach voters approved a measure in 2024 allowing the city to require people to show ID when casting a ballot. The state and a Huntington Beach resident promptly sued to block it. But the fight isn't over. The City Council voted unanimously this week to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in.

    Does the city have a shot? The Supreme Court gets 7,000 to 8,000 requests to review cases each year. The Court grants about 80 of these requests, so the city’s chances of getting the court’s attention are statistically slim.

    Read on ... for more about the legal battle.

    Huntington Beach will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review a decision striking down the city’s controversial voter ID law.

    What’s the backstory?

    Huntington Beach voters approved a measure in 2024 allowing the city to require people to show ID when casting a ballot. That contradicts state law — voters in California are asked to provide ID when they register to vote but generally not at polling places.

    The ensuing court battle

    The state and a Huntington Beach resident promptly sued the city over the voter ID law and won an appeals court ruling striking down the law. The California Supreme Court declined to review the decision earlier this month. The state also passed a law prohibiting cities from implementing their own voter ID laws.

    Then, the City Council voted unanimously this week to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in.

    Does the city have a shot?

    The Supreme Court gets 7,000 to 8,000 requests to review cases each year. The Court grants about 80 of these requests, so the city’s chances of getting the court’s attention are statistically slim.

    There’s also a question of whether or not the city’s voter ID case meets the Court’s criteria for review — SCOTUS addresses questions of federal law. Mayor Casey McKeon said it does, in a news release, noting a 2008 Supreme Court decision that upheld a state’s voter ID law — in Indiana. But Huntington Beach is a city, and the question in its voter ID case is whether or not a city can implement its own requirements for voting, even if it clashes with state law.

    Go deeper

    How to keep tabs on Huntington Beach

    • Huntington Beach holds City Council meetings on the first and third Tuesday of each month at 6 p.m. at City Hall, 2000 Main St.
    • You can also watch City Council meetings remotely on HBTV via Channel 3 or online, or via the city’s website. (You can also find videos of previous council meetings there.)
    • The public comment period happens toward the beginning of meetings.
    • The city generally posts agendas for City Council meetings on the previous Friday. You can find the agenda on the city’s calendar or sign up there to have agendas sent to your inbox.