The Brief

Tucked inside the Port of Los Angeles, an industrial island has become an unexpected flashpoint in the federal immigration crackdown.

Terminal Island is best known for housing shipyards, warehouses and the remnants of a Japanese American fishing village demolished during WWII.

But since the immigration sweeps began last month in L.A., the island has also become a hub for the agents staging at the federal facility there — and the locals keeping watch over them on behalf of their immigrant neighbors.

Soon after the sweeps began, Harbor Area Peace Patrols began sending volunteers to monitor the government vehicles streaming in and out of the sole access road to the gated facility, which holds a U.S. Coast Guard base and a low-security prison.

“We have people do shifts at Terminal Island throughout the day because it is such a strategic point,” said one of the volunteers, Victor Maldonado.

The Harbor Area patrollers say they’ve been able to tie about 60 of the government vehicles passing through Terminal Island to raids around the state, including a particularly chaotic operation at a cannabis farm in Camarillo.

Volunteers with Harbor Area Peace Patrols monitor Terminal Island for government vehicles.

(

Josie Huang

/

LAist

)

ICE watch

Thousands of people have been arrested since the sweeps started June 6 in Los Angeles. During this period, local efforts to block raids have surged, with outraged residents patrolling their neighborhoods and sounding the alarm if they see agents.

The Harbor Area patrol formed within days of the first sweeps, with support from Union del Barrio.

Every morning, at 6:30 a.m., volunteers meet at local spot for their assignments before getting into their cars.

Aside Terminal Island, patrols also span Wilmington, San Pedro and Carson and involve scanning parking lots for agents and notifying undocumented workers of constitutional rights.

Some volunteers, including Maldonado, keep gravitating to Terminal Island because their information-gathering could have implications for people far beyond the port.

Almost daily, the Carson resident crosses the Vincent Thomas Bridge onto the island before he starts his day as an employee representative in labor disputes.

“Once you realize the importance of it, and that just simply being there you could prevent someone from being abducted, you feel like it's like a moral duty,” Maldonado said.

This past Wednesday, Maldonado was joined on the island by five other volunteers, armed with cellphones, cameras and binoculars. They photographed cars coming and going from the complex. Red flags for them are dark-tinted windows, mostly American makes and masked drivers. They've documented vehicles with missing license plates or plates being swapped between cars.

Harbor Area patrollers Victor Maldonado and Merci Macatrao walk past a memorial to a Japanese American fishing village that once stood on Terminal Island.

(

Josie Huang

/

LAist

)

Maldonado is in charge of the Instagram page this day, and posts updates as he receives it from other volunteers, as well as sharing it with other community patrols.

Volunteer Gina Lumbruno says sometimes drivers flip them off, turn the camera phones on them or speed by dangerously close — the reason why the patrollers all now wear bright yellow safety vests.

“It’s so stupid,” Lumbruno said. “They give themselves away. They just profile their own selves by their actions.”

A dark chapter

The patrollers stand near a memorial to a vibrant fishing village for 3,000 islanders of Japanese descent who used to work on the harbor or in nearby tuna canneries. The bronze statue is of two fishermen facing opposite directions.

Lumbruno said before the raids, she used to visit the memorial regularly to clean off bird droppings and sweep away debris because of the deep meaning it held for her.

When she was growing up in San Pedro, Lumbruno’s tuna fisherman father told her what happened to the village. How it was demolished during World War II after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. How the Navy forced hundreds of residents into incarceration in Manzanar.

The only two buildings still standing housed a grocery and a dry goods store — structures that preservationists and locals like Lumbruno are trying to save from proposed demolition by port officials.

The A. Nakamura grocery store served the Japanese fishing community on Terminal Island.

(

Tim Yuji Yamamoto

/

National Trust for Historic Preservation

)

“This was something that was done,” said Lumbruno, who works in healthcare. “These people had their civil rights, their human rights, stripped from them just because of some xenophobic B.S., you know?”

Lumbruno said she sees a painful irony in federal agents driving by the bronze fishermen on their way to immigration operations.

“It's just crazy to me,” she said. “The same thing that was done to them is what's happening now.”

Indefinite vigilance

Federal agencies did not respond to LAist’s requests for information about their Terminal Island operations.

But the office of U.S. Rep. Nanette Barragán, who represents Harbor Area communities, said it has confirmed through the Coast Guard that its base is serving as a staging area for Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other personnel with the Department of Homeland Security.

A former immigration detention and processing center is housed on the same federal complex, but that dilapidated structure is not being used (except for a small portion by Coast Guard staff), according to Barragán’s office.

The Trump administration has given no timeline for how long the L.A. sweeps will last. But volunteers with the Harbor Area group vow to continue their work even as their numbers ebb and flow.

With the start of school, they expect participation may dip because a disproportionate number of volunteers are teachers. Maldonado is optimistic that others will step up.

“We're going to keep putting the information out there,” he said. “Even if it helps just one person, we're perfectly OK with that. As long as this continues, so will we.”

This summer's World Cup has been a bonanza for corporate sponsors.

Hydration breaks are "powered by Powerade." Each game crowns a Michelob Ultra "superior player of the match." Even the signs announcing player substitutions have a label slapped on: Rexona deodorant, which is owned by Unilever. They're the "official personal care sponsor" of this World Cup.

This relentless branding is nothing new for major sporting events, but it has provoked outrage in Los Angeles, where protests during the tournament took aim at FIFA's corporate partners, saying they betrayed the city's values.

At a demonstration in downtown L.A. last week, advocates rallied against a number of high-profile sponsors of the tournament, including Home Depot, the official "home improvement retailer" for the 2026 World Cup.

Its signature orange branding has been splashed across tournament activations this summer, but in the L.A. area its parking lots have been the sites of high profile immigration raids. Last summer in Monrovia, a man was killed fleeing ICE activity in a Home Depot parking lot after he ran onto a freeway and was hit by a car. In another incident, federal agents jumped out of a Penske moving van at the Westlake Home Depot and detained 16 people.

" Their parking lots have been turned into hunting grounds," said Miriam Arghandiwal, an organizer with the Boycott Home Depot Coalition.

" FIFA has been intentional in allowing the people's game to become the billionaire's game, and there's no better example of this than its choice in sponsors," she said at the protest.

The group also railed against FIFA partners Hyundai and Kia, citing a 2022 report that suppliers of Hyundai and Kia had used child labor in its Alabama factories. LAist has reached out to Home Depot and the Hyundai Motor Group, which also owns Kia, for comment.

Demonstrators said they wanted FIFA to make corporate accountability a metric of accepting a sponsor.

" We know mega-events like the World Cup can only happen with the support of host communities, local infrastructure and resources, with the workers throughout various supply chains that make these events possible," said Valerie Lizárraga with the nonprofit Jobs to Move America.

The group was also gathered to demand action from the Los Angeles Sports and Entertainment Commission, which runs the L.A. World Cup Host Committee. Demonstrators said they were dissatisfied with the committee's guidance on human rights for the World Cup.

A spokesperson for that commission deferred to FIFA for comment on corporate sponsorships. FIFA did not respond to LAist's request.

Last week, a small group of climate activists also demonstrated outside SoFi Stadium against Saudi energy company Aramco, another major FIFA partner. They were calling on FIFA to drop the fossil fuel giant as a sponsor.

The World Cup is wrapped up in Los Angeles after Friday's quarterfinal match between Spain and Belgium. But advocates rallying in L.A. say they are looking toward the future.

" Things like the World Cup [and] the Olympics are events that are fueled by people," said Father Thomas Carey, a member of Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice. "The question is, do we hold them to account to take care of and protect the people who work for them and the people who attend their games?"

Next year, Los Angeles will host the 2027 Super Bowl. And the year after that will be the Olympics.

The Trump administration is abandoning its most aggressive attempt to end gender-affirming care for youth nationally, according to an official document obtained by NPR.

The document shows that the Department of Health and Human Services will not be finalizing a proposed rule that would have blocked all Medicaid and Medicare funding for hospitals that provide pediatric gender-affirming care.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services told NPR in a statement: "CMS does not comment on future rulemaking or speculate on potential actions. The Trump Administration rejects ideologically driven surgical interventions on vulnerable children."

(Surgery is very rare among transgender people under age 18, and the rule applied to all gender-affirming care, which is mainly therapy and medications for children.)

A "victory" for trans rights, but not a "retreat" by HHS

The fact that the Trump administration is backing off from this action is "a victory for people who are defending the rights and interests of trans people," says Sam Bagenstos, a professor at Michigan Law who served as general counsel at HHS under the Biden administration. "But I don't think it indicates a more general retreat from the aggressive posture of the Trump administration."

Bagenstos notes that this type of leverage — a "conditions of participation" rule for the Medicare and Medicaid program — has historically been used by HHS to compel states and hospitals to meet basic health and safety standards. Things like "making sure that you have stockpiles of certain kinds of equipment, making sure that you have certain kinds of emergency protocols, making sure that you have certain staffing ratios," he explains.

The proposed rule was unprecedented, Bagenstos says, because it instead would have prohibited certain kinds of treatments for a certain population. He says it seemed unlawful in a variety of ways. For one, "it violates the Medicare Act, which says that Medicare and Medicaid can't be used to control the practice of medicine within the state — states get to regulate the practice of medicine," Bagenstos says.

Medical groups opposed the change

Normally, HHS would propose a rule, accept public comment for 60 days, and then finalize the rule so that it could take effect. In this case, after proposing the rule in December and receiving more than 30,000 comments, the administration is abandoning the rule. At least in the next year, it will not be finalized and will not take effect.

The American Medical Association and the Children's Hospital Association both submitted comments urging the agency to rescind or withdraw the proposed rule. Major U.S. medical groups say that puberty blockers and sex hormones are safe and can be effective for transgender young people.

Even so, gender-affirming care for youth is banned in 27 states after a flurry of laws passed over the last several years. In the remaining 23 states, many hospital clinics that offer gender-affirming care have continued to operate, while others have shuttered in the past year citing pressure from the Trump administration.

That pressure has come in the form of this proposed rule, another rule that would bar federal Medicaid reimbursement for transgender pediatric patients, and a declaration from Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that aimed to redefine the standard of care. (Interestingly, the press release issued when those actions were unveiled in December is now missing from the HHS website, as is the Kennedy declaration document.)

The Medicaid rule is currently in the final stage of review and appears to be on track to take effect in the coming weeks. A coalition of Democratic-led states sued over the so-called Kennedy declaration and succeeded in blocking it in federal court in Oregon. The Trump administration has not appealed that decision so far.

Protesters who are against gender-affirming care for young people gathered outside Boston Children's Hospital in September 2022.

(

Carlin Stiehl for The Boston Globe

/

Getty Images

)

At the same time, the Department of Justice has issued administrative and criminal subpoenas to hospitals seeking full personal medical files for transgender youth and employment files for their medical providers, although many of those attempts have been blocked in court so far. The Trump administration has also reached settlements with hospitals in Texas and Ohio that involved establishing "detransition" clinics.

And last month, when the Supreme Court allowed states to bar young transgender girls from sports, the White House issued a press release saying that the decision "Bolsters President Trump's Push to Eliminate Transgender Insanity." The release listed actions targeting transgender people across the federal government, from passport markers to military service to research funding.

Will hospitals that ended care for trans youth restart it?

While the Trump administration does not appear to be backing down from anti-transgender actions broadly, its decision not to finalize its most aggressive healthcare rule is significant, says Katie Keith, director of the Health Policy and the Law Initiative at Georgetown University who also worked in the Biden administration. Those other efforts are not nearly as durable as a finalized rule that takes effect, she notes.

The decision of the Trump administration not to finalize this rule "should give hospitals more confidence to either resume or continue offering the care," she says. Because the rule was never in effect, "I would argue that they should have been doing this all along anyway."

Kellan Baker agrees. He's a senior adviser for health policy at the Movement Advancement Project think tank, which focuses on LGBTQ issues. "This administration may have checked itself in one of the most extreme expressions of its agenda and I think people should take solace in that," he says. "But at the same time, this administration is continuing to show that its ultimate goal is eliminating healthcare for trans people and that it is apparently prepared to use almost any means necessary to do so."

The Medicare and Medicaid rule could theoretically be revived at some point, since it has not been formally withdrawn. An entry in the Trump administration's recent unified agenda sets a final action date for the proposed rule as December 2028, just before President Trump leaves office.

Copyright 2026 NPR

Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed a new law that expands the state's mobile ID program to 60% of licensed drivers, his office announced Monday.

For the last few years, participating residents have been able to use the state-issued mobile app and store their IDs in certain phone wallets as part of a pilot program.

Where you can use it

The program works for driver's licenses and state IDs.

The mobile version is mainly valid at airport security, but use is expected to expand in the future.

TSA accepts the California DMV Wallet App, as well as Apple, Google or Samsung wallets. A small number of stores accept them for age-restricted purchases.

One big caveat: Mobile IDs are not accepted by law enforcement or most state government agencies.

That means you should still keep your physical ID or license with you, especially if you're driving. You can find a full list of accepted places on the DMV's website.

How you can apply

Access to the program was previously capped to 4.2 million drivers — now that's quadrupled to over 16 million.

You can join the pilot by downloading the CA DMV Wallet app from your phone's app store and logging into your MyDMV account.

You'll need to provide your driver's license or ID card information. The app will prompt you to scan your card, and you'll have to refresh the mobile ID every 30 days.

More than 3.5 million Californians have joined so far.