The Brief

Fire departments across Southern California are posting about fireworks safety this week. While some are advising pyrotechnic lovers to use fireworks safely, others are saying they’re outright illegal. So, what’s the law?

Here’s all you need to know about how to enjoy the “rocket’s red glare” safely in SoCal this Fourth of July.

Are fireworks legal in California?

Kind of.

California bans fireworks that explode, go in the air and move uncontrollably on the ground. These so-called illegal fireworks include sky rockets, bottle rockets, aerial shells and firecrackers.

The law regarding other types of fireworks varies from city to city. In some California cities, there is a zero tolerance policy for all fireworks. But in others, “safe and sane” fireworks — which are non-explosive and non-projectile — are allowed.

How can I check if my city allows “safe and sane” fireworks?

Check out our list of SoCal cities that permit “safe and sane” fireworks:

Los Angeles County: Alhambra, Artesia, Azusa, Baldwin Park, Bellflower, Commerce, Compton, Cudahy, Downey, El Monte, Gardena, Hawaiian Gardens, Hawthorne, Huntington Park, Industry, Irwindale, La Mirada, La Puente, Lakewood, Lawndale, Lynwood, Maywood, Montebello, Monterey Park, Norwalk, Palmdale, Paramount, Pico Rivera, Rosemead, Sante Fe Springs, South El Monte, South Gate, Temple City and Vernon.

Orange County: Anaheim, Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, Los Alamitos, Orange, Santa Ana, Stanton, Villa Park and Westminster.

Riverside County: Blythe, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs and Indio.

Ventura County: Fillmore.

Imperial County: All cities permit “safe and sane” fireworks.

San Diego County: No cities permit “safe and sane” fireworks

San Bernardino County: Adelanto, Barstow, Chino, Colton, Needles and Rialto (as well as in specific locations in Fontana, Grand Terrace and San Bernardino).

Kern County: All cities permit “safe and sane” fireworks.

Santa Barbara County: Guadalupe, Lompoc and Santa Maria.

San Luis Obispo County: Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach and Morro Bay.

All fireworks are illegal in unincorporated communities, though there are some exceptions: in Kern County, “safe and sane” fireworks are only banned in unincorporated mountain communities, and certain counties may allow you to light fireworks in unincorporated regions if you have a permit.

Some cities have ordinances with additional restrictions, so be sure to check your city’s website for more information.

Why are fireworks dangerous?

Because they’re unpredictable.

Fireworks can go off randomly, go off in the wrong direction and cause much larger explosions than you may expect — particularly if they’re illegal or homemade. They also burn at incredibly high temperatures, with some reaching 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

When fireworks explode, they also release gases like carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide, which, if inhaled, is very harmful to the lungs — and the environment. If you’re working with or watching fireworks this Friday, try and avoid the smoke by staying upwind and indoors whenever possible, and monitoring air quality reports.

Fireworks can also start larger blazes.

Sean Doran, a fire captain and public information officer for the Orange County Fire Authority, said fires started by fireworks are “completely preventable.”

“[The] first line of defense in preventing these fires is by not using these fireworks and attending professional, city-sponsored shows,” Doran said.

For those who still plan to set off “safe and sane” fireworks, Doran gave the following tips:

• Have a water source easily available to douse unexpected flares and submerge fireworks after use.
• Avoid lighting fireworks near vehicles, houses, pets or children.
• Avoid lighting fragments of fireworks you see on the ground, even if they seem to have an unlit fuse — they may instantaneously explode once lit. Instead, leave the fragment where it is, and call for professionals to remove it.
• Do not let children handle fireworks or touch firework fragments.

Doran said that in 2023, Orange County saw 46 firework-related injuries and $181,000 in reported firework-caused property damage. In 2024, there were 66 injuries and $1.6 million in property damage.

“Nobody ever wakes up thinking… they're going to cause harm to a family member, to a friend, to a neighbor, to a home, to the wildland — nobody thinks that, but every year, it happens,” Doran said. “I don’t want anyone on the night of the Fourth of July to go to bed thinking, ‘What did I just do?”

Where can I buy “safe and sane” fireworks?

You can buy fireworks in person at state-authorized firework stands. Some cities only permit “safe and sane” firework sales on specific days and at specific times, so be sure to check that information for your city.

If you’re looking to buy fireworks online, here are some sellers that will ship “safe and sane” fireworks to California. But be warned: shipping takes several days, so you might want to bookmark these for next year’s Independence Day:

• Pyro Direct ships to the West Coast in 5-7 business days. While they don’t have an explicit “safe and sane” fireworks category, narrow your search to the ‘sparklers’ and ‘novelties’ categories — most fireworks there should fall under the “safe and sane” standard.
• Wholesale Sparklers ships to California in approximately 5 business days.
• OC Fireworks (and nope, not the OC you’re thinking of) has several fireworks options that can ship to California — check either the “safe and sane” or “low cost shipping” categories to find fireworks that are shippable to the state.

If you order non-legal fireworks across state lines, border authorities may confiscate them.

What are the repercussions of owning illegal fireworks?

If you’re caught with illegal fireworks, you’ll be charged with a misdemeanor, and will be fined between $1,000 and $2,000 or face up to one year in jail, or both.

And that’s just for possessing under 25 pounds of fireworks: as the weight goes up, fines can reach up to $100,000.

How can I enjoy fireworks if my city bans them?

Check out our list of venues to watch fireworks shows put on by cities and various organizations — as well as find some unconventional ways to celebrate the Fourth of July this year.

Something unusual is happening with only a few days remaining before the U.S. men's national team opens its World Cup campaign against Paraguay: Tickets for the match are not sold out.

Although numbers fluctuate regularly, FIFA's ticketing website still shows 132 tickets left to sell for a game that's set to take place in Los Angeles on Friday. Meanwhile, resale platforms such as StubHub and SeatGeek — and FIFA's own marketplace — also show thousands of tickets on sale.

The number is even higher for Canada's opening match against Bosnia Herzegovina in Toronto on the same day, with 226 tickets left in FIFA's website and a high number of tickets available in resale markets.

That's unusual for high-profile events such as the opening matches of the World Cup — traditionally among the hardest to get tickets in the tournament. This year will feature three hosts in the U.S., Canada and Mexico — but so far only Mexico's opening match against South Africa on Thursday looks to be virtually sold out.

Ticketing experts widely agree on the reason: the prices. FIFA dramatically jacked them up for the tournament — especially for high profile games. The most expensive regular seats for the U.S. opener against Paraguay are priced at $2,735 — more than the final cost for the 2022 World Cup final — while the cheapest are $1,120.

Even President Trump said he wouldn't pay those prices.

"I would certainly like to be there, but I wouldn't pay it either, to be honest with you," Trump told the New York Post in a recent interview.

The other two remaining games for the U.S. national have far fewer tickets available, given that prices are well below the ones for the opening match.

Prices have also fallen sharply

There are not only plenty of tickets left to sell — a number of them are also available below FIFA's face value. According to Ticketdata, which tracks prices across the resale platforms, the cheapest pair of tickets for the opening match for the U.S. and Canada was $951 as of Monday morning, while in FIFA's resale platform, tickets were available for as low as $690.

Other games across the 104-match tournament also still have many tickets left to sell — despite FIFA President Gianni Infantino's claim that every match is "already sold out." That's especially the case for lesser well known teams such as the Jordan against Algeria match, which still had hundreds of unsold seats in the FIFA's web site.

Demand for high-profile tickets such as Argentina and Portugal was far higher, however, with many of those games looking largely sold out.

Will the opening matches sell out?

Whether eventually the U.S. and Canada opening matches will sell out is hard to answer. Throughout the sales process, FIFA has closely guarded how many tickets it has actually sold and how many are left to sell, making it virtually impossible to gauge.

In addition, like other teams, FIFA could also sell tickets in other platforms including third-party ones such as SeatGeek, which can further obscure how many tickets are left to sell.

FIFA and organizers, however, are hoping for a surge in excitement that leads to a last-minute rush of sales for the opening matches as well as for those such as Jordan against Algeria that look far from being sold out.

Ben Shields, a senior lecturer at the MIT Sloan School of Management, says perceptions so far of the tournament have been shaped by how expensive tickets and travel has been for a tournament taking place across an entire continent.

That, he says, "does not seem to sit well with many."

But that could change.

"The hope or bet — for FIFA is that once the matches start — and the greatest players in the world compete for the most prestigious prize of them all, the sport as business lens will fade into the background and the World Cup will be seen and experienced as the enduring global institution that it is," Shields says. "We shall see."
Copyright 2026 NPR

Orange County’s top elected leaders on Tuesday are set to discuss what to do with $3.7 million recovered from the Andrew Do corruption scheme.

Do is now serving a five-year sentence in federal prison after he admitted to accepting bribes in exchange for awarding millions in tax dollars meant to feed needy seniors and people with disabilities in his district.

As part of the plea deal, Do acknowledged taking more than $800,000 in bribes through his two daughters, including a down payment on the house his youngest daughter Rhiannon Do later forfeited to resolve the criminal case. The scheme was first uncovered by LAist.

Federal officials recovered money from seized bank accounts and two properties connected to Do’s scheme — including the Tustin house his daughter bought.

The county Board of Supervisors is expected to publicly discuss plans for the recovered funds as they make decisions on the overall county budget at their meeting Tuesday. Public comment will also be taken.

What to do with the money?

Ahead of Tuesday’s discussion, Do’s successor said the funds should support residents of his former district who were deprived by Do and his alleged co-conspirators.

“For the past five years, every other district in Orange County has benefitted from the same community funds to support their cities, nonprofits, civic projects which strengthens their communities,” Supervisor Janet Nguyen wrote in a mass email to constituents last week. “However, our district went without because Do stole what belonged to our residents.”

“This money was stolen from the First District, and it must come back to the First District,” Nguyen added.

Nguyen was Do’s mentor and former boss more than a decade ago, before the two had a bitter falling out by 2016.

She encouraged residents of her district to send letters to the board and to speak during public comments.

Several county supervisors told LAist they supported a similar approach, one in which the recovered money goes to support the original intended recipients: seniors and people with disabilities in Do’s former district. Some supervisors have since advocated a broader view of how they’d want to use the money, noting that it was meant to address disruptions caused by the pandemic. Now that years have passed since the initial COVID-19 outbreak and lockdowns, some supervisors argue community needs have changed.

“We are so many years on, and the problems that money originally was to address (mostly Covid impacts) are now behind us, that I think we should have a discussion about how and where to spend it,” Supervisor Don Wagner told LAist via text message in March. “The budget is so tight and the needs so great across the county.”

Supervisor Vicente Sarmiento said he’d work toward a fair distribution of the funds to best serve residents, with a focus on current needs.

“We will definitely consider what areas of the County were harmed by Do’s scheme, but we must also remember that the funds were intended for relief efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic, a threat we are no longer facing,” he said in March. “We also need to consider addressing the current needs of residents with any dollars returned to the county.”

Millions more haven’t been recovered, at least yet

The amount of taxpayer money recovered so far is less than half of the $7.9 million Andrew Do admitted was diverted from specific meal contracts.

In a lawsuit seeking to recover funds, the county alleges the total amount lost in the scheme was even larger: $13.25 million. The county’s suit — scheduled for trial in November 2027 — covers all of the money Do gave to two nonprofits accused in the scheme, Viet America Society and Hand to Hand Relief Organization.

That leaves more than $4 million — and possibly much more — not yet recovered.

A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office noted they have an ongoing criminal case against Do’s alleged co-conspirator Peter Pham.

“Assuming we obtain a conviction in that matter, we would expect to seek restitution,” the spokesperson, Ciaran McEvoy, said.

Pham left the country on a flight to Taiwan in late 2024 and remains a fugitive, according to McEvoy. The case against him also includes charges against another alleged co-conspirator, Thanh Huong Nguyen, who led the Hand to Hand nonprofit.

Fans of the U.S. Men’s National Soccer Team swelled the stadium at the Great Park in Irvine on Monday to watch players practice for the first time since arriving at the training facility they’ll call home for the first round of the 2026 World Cup.

“Seeing them play right now… it was really cool to see how they play and how they practice,” said Mila Ran, who came with her mother from nearby Mission Viejo.

“This whole time she’s saying, 'I want to go shoot, I want to go play,'” said Mila’s mother, Farah Ran.

They were among about 6,000 people who won free entry to the practice in a lottery that received more than 30,000 entries, according to Irvine officials.

Fans got to the venue early.

(

Adolfo Guzman-Lopez

/

LAist

)

The team’s biggest stars — Christian Pulisic, Antonee Robinson and others — showed off their ball handling skills, honed over years of play on U.S. youth fields and overseas in professional leagues. Fans yelled, waved U.S. flags, held up homemade signs, and did the wave several times.

The U.S. Men's National Team at their only open-to-the-public practice session in Irvine.

(

Adolfo Guzman-Lopez

/

LAist

)

After the roughly 45-minute practice, some players walked to the sidelines to take selfies with fans and sign autographs.

The players know it’s going to take more than this, however, to live up to expectations during the World Cup.

US men's national team player Tim Ream signs an autograph for a fan.

(

Adolfo Guzman-Lopez

/

LAist

)

“To be in a position to train in front of these people today… is such a unique opportunity and one that none of us take for granted,” said backup goalie Matt Freese before the practice. “We’re working as hard as we can, as focused as we can to leave the next generation inspired."

The U.S. men’s team and their training staff will use the Great Park facility over the next several weeks as the team plays Paraguay on Friday, Australia on June 19, and Turkey on June 25 in group play at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood.

Jury selection began Monday for the trial of the man accused of igniting a fire that led to the deadly and destructive Palisades Fire, which killed 12 people and destroyed thousands of structures.

Jonathan Rinderknecht is charged with one count of destruction of property by means of fire, one count of arson affecting property used in interstate commerce and one count of setting timber afire. He could face up to 45 years in federal prison.

How we got here

Prosecutors allege Rinderknecht set brush alight near a popular hiking trail in the Santa Monica Mountains on New Year’s Day, starting the Lachman Fire. Firefighters initially thought they put out the fire, but it remained smouldering underground for several days. High winds then brought the embers to the surface, sparking the Palisades Fire, which burned more than 23,000 acres.

What prosecutors say

In a court filing in April, prosecutors allege Rinderknecht displayed “extreme anger, indignation, and frustration” because he had to spend New Year's Eve alone. After driving around for Uber, Rinderknecht hiked up a popular trail and set chaparral alight in a clearing, according to prosecutors.

“He then started calling 911 multiple times, hiked down the hill, and fled the area in his car before firefighters arrived. Defendant returned to the area after he saw fire trucks arriving and then took videos of the firefighting efforts,” prosecutors wrote.

The filing also states that Rinderknecht threatened to burn down his sister’s home.

Prosecutors are expected to argue that Rinderknecht started the smaller blaze knowing it could turn into a bigger inferno.

U.S. District Court Judge Anne Hwang has previously expressed the government’s position could confuse jurors.

What the defense says

Defense attorney Steve Haney previously told reporters that prosecutors were trying to blame Rinderknecht for a fire that started days before the Palisades Fire.

"Well what about what happened between Jan. 1 and Jan. 7?" he asked. "Jonathan wasn't out there with a fire hose putting that fire out at the Lachman location, the Fire Department was. So why are they blaming him for whatever the Fire Department didn't do?"