The Brief

A lucky few got a glimpse of the interior of the revamped Vista Theater on Sunset Boulevard last week, one of the last remaining single-screen movie theaters in the Southland, when owner Quentin Tarantino held a special screening of the 1993 cult classic True Romance.

The Vista — with a new 70 mm projection system, sound system, and 21-seat screening room and café named “Coffy,” after the 1973 Pam Grier film — opens officially on Friday at 4473 Sunset Dr., with horror maestro Eli Roth’s Thanksgiving.

The rebirth is the latest chapter in the century-long saga of one of L.A.’s most famous historic theaters. “The history of the Vista is quite surprising, and full of ups and down, and I for one find its resilience to be the most exciting part,” says Celine Vacher, of the Los Feliz Neighborhood Council.

To tell its story, you need to go all the way back to the birth of Hollywood.

Sunset Boulevard

Filmmaking came to the East Hollywood/Los Feliz area in 1912, when producers L.L. Burns and Harry Revier leased a fig orchard on Sunset Boulevard. On this farmland they built a rustic studio, which was soon renamed Reliance Film Company. Reliance quickly hired pioneering director D. W. Griffith, who brought along his silent film stars Lillian and Dorothy Gish.

Griffith eventually gained control of the studio, which he renamed Fine Arts Studio. In 1914, Griffith built a sprawling replica of a southern antebellum town around the junction of Sunset and Hollywood Boulevards. This set was used for his revolutionary, highly controversial 1915 racist epic The Birth of a Nation, which many historians point to as the first blockbuster full-length feature.

The next movie Griffith set at Sunset Junction would become part of Los Angeles lore. In this quiet rural neighborhood, still dotted with farmhouses and ranches, Griffith constructed a towering plaster set for his 1916 epic Intolerance. Meant to portray the ancient palace of Belshazzar, King of Babylon, the set covered an astounding three city blocks.

“Belshazzar’s Feast beneath Egyptian blue skies,” writer Kenneth Anger wrote in his infamous 1959 expose Hollywood Babylon, “spread out under the blazing California sun: more than four thousand extras recruited from L.A. paid an unheard-of two dollars a day plus box lunch, plus carfare.”

A large crowd congregates outside of Bard's Hollywood Theatre to celebrate its grand opening

(

Los Angeles Public Library

)

After filming, the set remained up in some form until 1922, becoming a playground for local children. By then, the area was becoming a hub for silent productions, crew bungalows, and stars’ mansions. “Los Feliz was home to Walt Disney’s very first studios, Cecil B. DeMille’s estate where Charlie Chaplin once resided, and even the Vitagraph studios where parts of The Jazz Singer (the first movie with sound) were filmed,” says Vacher.

Egyptian revival style

So it was fitting that the theatrical impresario Lou Bard chose to build the latest in his string of theaters at the fabled intersection of Hollywood and Sunset Boulevards, known as “the great crossroads of Los Angeles.” On Oct. 9, 1923, the 838-seat single screen theater, said to have been called Lou Bard Playhouse or Bard’s Hollywood, opened with a special vaudeville show and the short Tips, starring child star Baby Peggy — who also appeared on stage.

The theater design was as trendy as it could be. Designed by architect Lewis A. Smith, the exterior was constructed in the popular Spanish Mission Revival style. But it was the interior that was truly a feast for the imagination. Designed in the peculiarly western “Egyptian revival” style (popularized by the discovery of King Tut’s tomb in 1922), the interior was a brightly colored riot of golden pharaohs, goddesses, and lamps shaped like pyramids.

According to the Los Angeles Times, the theater was the site for all important industry previews during the golden age of silent film. But Bard was not as successful as he would have liked, and he reportedly sold the theater in 1927. It was renamed the Vista.

Over the decades, the Vista went through many owners. But it was reliably a popular neighborhood theater, even as larger, showier movie palaces sprang up all over Los Angeles.

A crowd of movie-goers attend a showing of Mildred Pierce, starring Joan Crawford, at the Vista Theater.

(

Los Angeles Public Library

)

Controversies over the years

Yet the small but mighty theater would find itself the center of controversies which cemented its place in history. In 1948, the theater capitalized on its historic location by announcing a revival of the problematic The Birth of a Nation, only days after D.W. Griffith's death on July 23, 1948. The Hollywood Reporter noted the choice, in a short article headlined “Opportunism!” It read:

Disturbed Angelenos immediately took action. Allen M. Metcalf, a local candidate from the Progressive Party, went to the theater to confront the management. “The manager of the theater,” the Los Angeles Times reported, “pointed out that the movie showed the skeleton in the closet of the nation and denied that the cinema was incitement for a riot.”

Progressives were unconvinced. Around 20 Black and white civil rights activists formed a picket line in an attempt to block customers from seeing the film. However, the revival continued.

Charges of un-American values

Controversy came again in the 1950s, when the theater reopened as the Vista Continental. Capitalizing on the growing popularity of foreign films, the theater boasted that it was the only SoCal theater showing first-run films from the Soviet Union. This led locals to complain that the theater was promoting un-American, Communist values at the height of the Cold War. But the theater soldiered on.

The biggest test for the Vista came in the 1960s. During that era, the theater began showing pornographic films, including same-sex films. Irate, the city revoked its operating permit. The Vista fought back, and in 1968 the case was heard in the California Supreme Court.

The Vista won the case, in a decisive blow against anti-gay governance. “The court ruled, in a 5-2 decision, that the law is ‘overly broad’ and threatens to deny theater operators their rights of free speech and press,” the Los Angeles Times reported in June 1968.

“The Court ruled that Stewart Burton, manager of the Vista Theater, should be granted a writ of prohibition against the Los Angeles Board of police commissioners, which did not renew his license.”

Over the next three decades, the theater changed hands several times before it was purchased by Landmark Theatres in 1982. It became known for reviving classic films like Harold and Maude and Gone with the Wind, but business was slow, as VHS decimated art houses nationwide.

A neighborhood gathering place

In 1997, the Vista was purchased by Lance Alspaugh’s Vintage Theater Group. Alspaugh made community outreach a priority. It became known for its very own Walk of Fame, featuring handprints and footprints from stars like John Landis, Elvira, Tatum and Ryan O’Neal, and Baby Peggy herself.

“It’s been an integral part of Los Feliz because it’s intentionally embedded itself in the community,” Vacher says. “Take the longtime manager [Victor Martinez], for example, every big opening night he greets moviegoers in full costume. It’s become a tradition and locals all have their own sets of memories with him as he makes everyone feel like a welcomed friend.”

The Vista became an important gathering place in the area, known for its welcoming atmosphere, epitomized by Martinez (who is reportedly currently on the board of the theater). The theater was rented out for weddings, late night screenings, and was the home of Thomas Starr King Middle School’s annual animation and film festival. There was a Secret Movie Club, and local filmmakers were thrilled when they had premieres at their neighborhood theater.

“I had my first movie premiere at the Vista, which we sold out,” says filmmaker Kestrin Pantera, whose film Let’s Ruin it with Babies premiered in 2013. “It was an…amazing all-night karaoke party and a dream come true to be on the marquee.”

The pandemic shuttered the Vista, which closed in 2020. The marquee, which read “To Be Continued…” became a hopeful sight for weary travelers driving down Sunset Boulevard during the shutdown.

What Tarantino says is next for the theater

But the Vista had not taken its final bow. In 2021, it was announced that director Quentin Tarantino, who saved the historic New Beverly Cinema when he purchased it in 2007, had bought the movie house. “I would not have handed the keys to the Vista over to just anybody,” Alspaugh told the Los Angeles Times.

“It’s no secret that Tarantino often pays homage to Hollywood history in his films, so it feels all the more appropriate that someone with such reverence for the art of filmmaking would be the new custodian of this iconic theater in its iconic location,” Vacher says.

Tarantino vowed to show only movies on film at the new Vista, instead of digital projection. He also clearly valued the communal aspects Alspaugh had fostered over the years. “I do think boutique cinemas will actually thrive at this time,” Tarantino told the Los Angeles Times. “I got a living room. I want to go to a movie theater.”

Over the last two years the Vista has undergone a dramatic makeover. “Quentin basically retained the auditorium — it’s intact, it’s been rehabbed and it’s still new and beautiful, but the overall auditorium is in intact condition,” said Alspaugh, who has remained as chief operating officer.

“The intention is to run mostly first-run and occasional classics or repertory film,” Alspaugh told Variety’s Pat Saperstein. “There will be sections of time where you might see classic repertory titles on film for brief interludes. In the future, you’ll see some late shows of classic films and I think you’ll see morning shows of classic films.”

Whatever happens, cinephiles are just happy that their favorite historic theater is again part of the community where it has thrived for a century.

“The entire neighborhood has been anxiously awaiting the Vista’s comeback,” Vacher says. “It’s been on everyone’s lips. We’re all so eager to see that corner revived and active, no doubt we’ll all be flocking to it trying to make up for lost time.”

A federal judge on Thursday ordered major changes to reported conditions at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center in San Bernardino County, granting a preliminary injunction that requires federal immigration officials provide people with clean drinking water and adequate medical care.

U.S. District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes ruled that the detainees who brought the lawsuit “demonstrated they are likely to prevail” on their claims that conditions at the facility violate Fifth Amendment protections against inhumane conditions of confinement. While the case will continue to work its way through the courts, the judge issued the ruling now, finding that people being detained could suffer irreparable harm without court intervention.

The suit came after two deaths at the facility within weeks of each other last fall: Ismael Ayala-Uribe, a 39-year-old former DACA recipient, and 56-year-old Gabriel Garcia-Aviles. Both deaths are still under federal investigation as scrutiny over the conditions inside immigrant detention centers in the Trump administration continues to mount.

In their lawsuit, lawyers for the detainees said Adelanto violated ICE detention guidelines by failing to provide clean drinking water, nutritious meals, sanitation, access to medical care and medicine, as well as medical intake screening upon arrival at the facility. They also alleged violations of rules around recreation time outside, visitation time for family, daily headcount to ensure detainees are alive, and accommodations for people with disabilities.

In response, Sykes ordered 24-hour access to clean drinking water, meals with a sufficient number of calories, and access to soap and hygiene products free of charge. The injunction also requires the facility to be cleansed daily and for mold to be identified and removed. Detainees are to be provided blankets and temperature-appropriate clothing, as well as access to recreational yard time outside for at least four hours every day.

The order prevents Adelanto, which is located about 90 miles northeast of Los Angeles, from limiting family visitation during regular business hours, including removing time restrictions and physical contact, such as hugging or holding hands, with family members. It also says the facility can not cancel a visitation if a family member needs to use the restroom during the visit.

The majority of people being held in immigration detention centers in California have not been accused of committing crimes, only of civil immigration violations.

The court ordered Adelanto to perform at least two headcounts every day, once overnight and once during the day, to ensure detainees are present and not incapacitated. The court also ordered restrictions on sending detainees to isolation, barring a life safety risk to staff or if the detainee requests it.

The ruling requires Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other named defendants to immediately provide detainees with the condition upgrades the judge ordered.

The Department of Homeland Security declined to comment on the ruling. DHS attorney Pushkal Mishra argued in court last week the federal government couldn’t be held liable for the actions of its contractor, GEO Group, which runs Adelanto and 18 other immigration facilities around the country.

In a motion to dismiss the case, DHS argued that it should not have “to take over the daily management of a federal contract from a private contractor.”

GEO Group did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Disability access in ICE facilities has been a recurring issue since the Trump administration took office for a second term. According to the complaint, one person described being placed in handcuffs and ankle chains for court appearances despite using a cane. Others alleged people with mobility issues were routinely assigned top bunks. The new court order requires the government to provide people with disabilities with reasonable accommodations.

The court has given the federal government 14 days to create a plan to address medical care and disability needs for detainees. The order requires all detainees to be given an intake screening upon arriving for physical or mental illnesses, ensure ongoing treatment and medication, and treat and segregate detainees to prevent the spread of communicable diseases. The order also mandates that every detainee must have access to primary, secondary, and tertiary medical care and be advised of their patient rights.

Sykes ordered that the government must provide two independent monitors for the duration of the lawsuit to ensure compliance with the court orders. Detainees must also be given the opportunity to submit grievances to the monitors in English or Spanish that are contained in a lockbox only accessible to the monitors.

A report by the California attorney general this year found that six people have died in detention facilities in the state since the start of the Trump administration’s mass deportation campaign. Nationwide, 22 people have died this year in immigration detention.

This week, the Mexican federal government called on state attorneys general to criminally investigate cases where Mexican nationals have died in ICE custody.

The White House has released a series of documents that President Donald Trump said in a primetime address reveals "shocking vulnerabilities in our election infrastructure."

Yet Trump, who for years has baselessly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him, did not detail allegations of widespread illegal votes in that election. Numerous reviews have debunked his claims about that election.

Instead, he focused on allegations that China had accessed voter data and that noncitizens are found on certain states' voter rolls, among his claims.

Yet Trump has often spoken of issues with elections that fall apart under scrutiny. His administration's system for identifying noncitizens on voter rolls has incorrectly flagged citizens, for example.

The remarks came as his war in Iran approaches the five-month mark, some Republican lawmakers want him to focus on the economy, and as his approval rating remains near second-term lows.

This is a breaking news story and will be updated.
Copyright 2026 NPR

The state is often knocked by the rest of the country as being "slow" to count votes. But here's the deal: that's a feature, not a bug, of the election system.

The backstory

Things take a while here largely because California works so hard to expand the ways people can vote. For example:

• Californians in recent years overwhelmingly vote by mail — nearly 90% of votes cast in the 2024 presidential election were mail-in ballots. In that same year's primary the percentage was just as high. Those ballots can be postmarked up to and including Election Day. They're counted as long as the ballot arrives within seven days (for the June primary, that was June 9).
• California offers same-day voter registration at any voting center. These new voters must cast a provisional ballot, which is counted once election officials confirm their eligibility (they are overwhelmingly accepted — for example, Los Angeles County reports that historically between 85% to 90% have been counted.)
• Voters also have the right to cast provisional ballots if there's any problem on Election Day — like if poll workers aren't able to void an outstanding mail-in ballot, or if there’s any issue calling up voter information from e-pollbooks. Again (see above), provisionals take longer to process because eligibility has to be confirmed.
• Vote-by-mail ballots require signature matching. When the one received doesn't match the one on file, county registrars must contact that voter to let them know — and give them the chance to correct it.
• And, with more than 23 million registered voters, we're really, really big. In the 2024 general election more than 16 million Californians voted (down from nearly 18 million in the 2020 presidential election). Either way, that’s more people than the total populations of all but three other states.

Why things have sped up, some

But things have sped up considerably in the 30 counties that have adopted a 2016 law called the Voter's Choice Act, including L.A., Orange and Riverside counties. In recent elections, the changes associated with that law — like voters not being locked into a designated polling location — drastically cut down the number of provisional ballots cast, which helped move things along faster than they had before.

A closer look at ballot counting times in California where an increasing number of vote-by-mail ballots has slowed ballot counts.

(

Courtesy California Voter Foundation

)

Still, accuracy and a commitment to "expanding the franchise" — translation: allowing more people to vote — means the process is not designed to produce instantaneous results.

L.A. County Office of Education’s letter to Los Angeles Unified School District earlier this month, warning it was at risk of running out of money, has escalated tensions between county overseers and the state’s biggest school district.

LACOE has told the district it must revise its $21 billion budget by mid-August — or risk the appointment of an external advisor with the power to override the LAUSD board and superintendent’s decisions.

The district has already announced the elimination of hundreds of jobs, primarily in its administrative offices, and approved another plan to cut an estimated $3.6 billion over the next three years through furloughs, layoffs and school consolidations.

But LACOE says it wants a more specific plan with more details, and has assigned a fiscal expert to help.

What does it all mean — for teachers, staff and most importantly, the almost 400,000 students in LAUSD schools? We break it down.

What’s in the letter?

The letter outlines a list of why the County has determined the district will become insolvent.

These include:

• Running out of money: The district's own projection has shown that its operating cash will be $231 million in the red by November 2027. “A district that cannot maintain a positive cash balance is unable to meet payroll and other obligations as they come due,” wrote Debra Duardo, the L.A. County superintendent. 

• New labor agreements with teachers, principals, school support staff and other employees: Recently approved contracts, which the unions say are essential to helping employees weather the region’s increasingly high cost of living, will cost an additional $1 billion in the next school year. These increases outpace the state’s  cost of living increases. 
  
• Declining enrollment and attendance: About 40% fewer students attend LAUSD schools than two decades ago, in part because of lower birthrates and families leaving because of the region’s high cost of living. Over time, this can reduce revenue because state funding is calculated based on how many students show up for class each day. 
  
• Leadership stability: The LAUSD Board appointed Andrés Chait, a longtime district administrator, as superintendent in June, just days after his predecessor resigned amid an ongoing federal investigation. ”This transition occurs at the moment the district must execute substantial corrective actions,” Duardo wrote.

It also includes next steps. We’ll discuss those below.

Why did LACOE send the letter July 2?

The letter is part of a process outlined in California law meant to prevent districts from going bankrupt.

Specifically, LACOE is required to intervene anytime it determines the district may be unable to meet its financial obligations in the current or subsequent two years (California requires districts to budget in three-year blocks.)

Has this happened to LAUSD before?

The requirement to issue this letter is fairly new and tied to a 2021 change in state law.

However, LACOE has intervened in LAUSD’s finances in the past. The agency assigned a fiscal expert team to the district from January 2019 to December 2021 after determining the district was at risk of not meeting its financial obligations.

The team helped analyze staffing, enrollment and make adjustments to the budget, according to a statement provided by Elizabeth Graswich, executive director of LACOE’s public affairs and communications department.

How did LAUSD get to this point?

The shortest explanation is that LAUSD is spending more money than it brings in.

The last three budgets relied on billions of dollars in reserves to offset the deficit.

Some of those reserves were built up when the district was receiving federal pandemic relief money and that funding ended in 2024.

LAUSD, like other districts in the state, also faces increased costs on everything from employee salaries and benefits to providing services for students with disabilities and settlements for decades-old sexual assault claims.

The district’s unions, parents, and several board members have also called for increased scrutiny on how much money the district spends on third-party contracts, including with tech companies.

Is LAUSD making cuts? How will they affect students?

LAUSD has already eliminated hundreds of jobs, primarily in its administrative offices, earlier this year.

This summer the board approved another plan to cut an estimated $3.6 billion over the next three years.

That plan includes furlough days for all employees, the elimination of thousands more jobs and cuts to the trust that funds retiree health benefits.

Among the cuts is the elimination of $900 million that helps high-needs schools pay for counselors, tutors and other student supports.

Most of these cuts aren’t scheduled to go into effect until the 2027-28 and 2028-29 school years.

The county said in its letter that the district plan needs to be more specific and include how each proposed change will be implemented, when the change will happen and how the outcomes will be measured.

Has there been any push back to the letter’s findings?

The district did not appeal the letter’s findings to the state, according to a district spokesperson.

However, when LAist asked if the district disputed any of the findings, a spokesperson wrote that the district is quote “continuing conversations” with the County, and that a revision to the budget may not be required.

“We will remain in conversation with LACOE to ensure our financial plan remains responsible, transparent, and aligned with our long-term commitments,” the spokesperson wrote.

The teachers union has said the letter unfairly targets the union’s new contracts.

“To me it feels as though the message is, ‘We warned you not to approve these contracts, and yet you did, and now we're going to overstep,’” said Gloria Martinez, president of United Teachers Los Angeles.

Martinez said the overall problem is that California doesn’t adequately fund public education.

We’re about a month away from the start of the next school year. What happens next?

The county has appointed a fiscal expert to help the district revise its budget by mid-August. Otherwise, the county says this advisor could be given the power to override decisions by the board and superintendent.

What happens if the district runs out of money?

Districts that become insolvent can lose the power to govern themselves in an arrangement called receivership. Instead of the elected school board and appointed superintendent making decisions about everything from curriculum to the budget, that power is transferred to an external administrator.

Receivership is a condition of accepting an emergency loan from the state. Only 10 school districts, out of nearly 1,000 statewide, have entered receivership since 1990, including Inglewood Unified.

The impact on students varies from district to district. The process was designed to protect students from sudden school shutdowns, but it comes at a cost. Districts must pay back the emergency loan and community-members lose the ability to elect or recall decision-makers during the receivership.

Contact your school board member

The LAUSD's Board's next meeting is a closed session scheduled for 10 a.m. Tuesday, Aug.11.