The Brief

Pointing to a series of problems and a breakdown in trust, L.A.’s city attorney is now recommending yanking control of the troubled Skid Row Housing Trust from the person she had a judge put in charge just a few months ago.

In a memo dated Friday, City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto and the city’s housing director outlined their support for asking the judge to replace Mark Adams as the properties’ receiver — and have the city lend up to $10 million toward fixing problems with the apartments.

To incentivize the judge to replace him, the city would be offering the low interest loan on the condition that Adams is replaced. City councilmembers are expected to take up the recommendation at a budget committee meeting Monday. The committee's chair, Bob Blumenfield, told LAist Friday afternoon that he supports the move to replace Adams.

“All of these red flags move from being red flags to being flashing red lights that say, 'watch out'," Blumenfield said.

"We really need to do everything we can to prevent a human tragedy from getting worse, and to look after the public dollar as well. Because that is very much at stake," he added.

Back in late March, Feldstein Soto had asked a court to put Adams in control of the trust’s 29 properties, which are home to about 1,500 formerly unhoused people — after the nonprofit Housing Trust fell apart financially and many of its apartments were deemed health and safety risks.

But in a reversal of confidence, Feldstein Soto joined with L.A. Housing Department chief Ann Sewill to recommend Adams be replaced by Kevin Singer of Receivership Specialists, for “some or all” of the properties.

'Disappointing' progress

“[Adams’] progress toward resolving serious code enforcement violations such as repairing the fire/life safety systems, fixing plumbing problems in common area restrooms and restoring units that have been cited for abatement by HACLA for minor code violations has been disappointing,” states the memo to the city council.

“In addition, just a couple of weeks ago, the property management company hired by [Adams] sent out 3-day eviction notices to hundreds of tenants which were then rescinded but which should never have been sent.”

Feldstein Soto previously told the Los Angeles Times the 451 eviction notices were illegal under the city’s tenant protection law and violated his promise to not evict anyone solely for being behind on rent.

The memo also says Adams hasn’t hired enough staff to repair and secure the properties and says he hasn’t provided the court-ordered reporting and accounting that the city and other agencies require.

“It became apparent that the receivership would be better served with a different receiver,” it states.

Adams didn’t respond to LAist’s requests for comment Friday morning, and a spokesperson for the city attorney said they had no comment.

In recommending Singer to replace Adams, officials wrote that Singer has handled nearly 500 receiverships statewide — more than Adams’ roughly 300 — and that San Francisco officials spoke highly of his work in the city, which included “a very challenging receivership” in the Tenderloin District.

Asked if Singer received more vetting by the city attorney than Adams did, Blumenfield said he and others have asked and "we have been assured there’s been considerably more vetting."

What happens next

The request to extend city loans up to $10 million — as long as the court replaces Adams — now heads to the city council’s budget committee for a decision. That meeting is set for Monday at 2 p.m.

“One way or the other, the public ends up on the hook for this," Blumenfield told LAist, saying that he believes if the Housing Trust implodes, many of the residents will end up back on the streets with no other options.

"An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. We need to be smart about this and engage as early as we can to prevent a bigger catastrophe that will also end up costing us a tremendous amount of money – which is why we're even entertaining the idea of engaging with our own tax dollars in this process.”

As part of the loan, Blumenfield said, the city would put in place more stringent requirements for the new receiver to update the city – and consequences if that doesn't happen.

Blumenfield said that's something the city can't currently require, because the receivership is a court-controlled process and the city isn't a lender.

It will ultimately be up to L.A. Superior Court Judge Mitchell Beckloff whether to replace Adams. His support of Adams could be waning — last week, during a tense court hearing in downtown L.A., Beckloff removed seven properties from the receivership and questioned Adams’ efforts to improve the properties. Still, the judge expressed support for Adams, saying he thought he was the right person for the job.

It’s unclear what the status is of the city attorney’s investigation of Adams’ performance, which she revealed last week. Her spokesperson declined to comment about it Friday.

The key going forward, Blumenfield said, is for the housing units to be fixed up quickly so they can become financially stable. Currently, hundreds of the units are ineligible for federal housing voucher dollars because the city has declared they violate livability standards, including for issues like fire safety.

Past issues

The move comes after the improper eviction notices, and reports by the L.A. Times and LAist about multiple judges finding problems with his past receiverships, including major overbilling for his company’s services.

LAist also reported earlier this month that a company Adams created for his receivership work has been banned by the state from doing business since 2015 over unpaid taxes. Adams told us he’d look into it and said his current company is in good standing.

City officials have said the stakes are high with the housing trust. For decades, it’s been one of L.A.’s largest providers of affordable housing to unhoused people. But its buildings have fallen into disrepair in recent years as its nonprofit owner descended into disfunction and financial ruin, according to the memo and reporting by the Times.

On April 5, just before Adams was put in charge, three people were found dead in a Skid Row Housing Trust building due to suspected overdoses.

When Feldstein Soto announced in late March she would be seeking the receivership that put Adams in control of the properties, she said the 1,500 people living in its buildings are extremely at-risk.

“[These] are among our most marginalized and vulnerable populations,” Feldstein Soto told reporters. “If they lose their housing, there is very little question that they will spill out onto our streets.”

LAist reporter David Wagner contributed to this story.

The Supreme Court on Monday gave itself more time to consider a national ban on telemedicine access to the abortion pill mifepristone.

Justice Samuel Alito extended an earlier order he issued by three more days, so rules for prescribing mifepristone online or through the mail remain in effect through Thursday at a minimum.

The case at issue

The tumult over the future of telemedicine access to mifipristone started on May 1 with a ruling from the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. That ruling re-instituted prescribing rules from before the pandemic that required patients to receive mifepristone in person in a doctor's office or clinic.

The Food and Drug Administration determined that the rule was medically unnecessary in 2021. The state of Louisiana sued last fall, arguing that telemedicine access undermines the state's abortion ban.

What is telemedicine abortion?

The telemedicine abortion process starts with a patient connecting with a healthcare provider on the phone or online. If the patient is eligible, that provider can prescribe two medications — mifepristone and another pill called misoprostol. Patients can pick up the medicine at a local pharmacy, or providers can mail the drugs to a patient's home.

That access is a big part of the reason why the number of abortions nationally has actually increased since the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion in 2022. Now, most abortions in the U.S. use this combination of medications, and one quarter happen via telemedicine.

After the 5th Circuit ruling, some providers said they would continue offering telemedicine access to abortion medication using a different protocol that involves higher doses of misoprostol and no mifepristone.

Researchers say that method is just as safe and effective, but tends to cause more pain for patients and more side effects, like nausea and diarrhea. Misoprostol has other medical uses, such as treating gastric ulcers and hemorrhage, and has been on the market longer than mifepristone. It is likely to remain fully accessible, even if mifepristone is restricted.

Since the FDA's prescribing rules for medications apply to the whole country, a change to the rules about how mifepristone can be accessed has national impact. That means it affects states with constitutionally-protected access to abortion, states with criminal bans, like Louisiana, and all states in between.

States' rights

Nearly two dozen Democratic-led states submitted an amicus brief in this case, writing that the appeals court decision put the policy choices of states with bans above the choices of states "that have made the different but equally sovereign determinations to promote access to abortion care."

There are also stakes related to the power of FDA and other expert agencies to set rules. While the Trump administration's FDA did not respond to the Supreme Court's request for briefs, a group of former leaders of the agency, who served under mainly Democratic and some Republican presidents, wrote about this in an amicus brief.

They defended the FDA's process in approving the medication and modifying the rules for prescribing it, and say the appeals court decision "would upend FDA's gold-standard, science-based drug approval system."

Copyright 2026 NPR

For a decade, LAist has been making navigating elections in California and L.A. easier through our Voter Game Plan guides. More than 3 million people visited the Voter Game Plan during our coverage of the 2024 elections. That’s equivalent to more than half of the overall registered voters in L.A. County.

We’ve heard from so many people who tell us that Voter Game Plan has helped them make their most informed votes ever. You’ve told us that these helpful, plain-spoken and nonpartisan guides are essential in Southern California.

And each election cycle, we strive to find new ways to make them even better. Over the last few elections, we’ve added charts that let you follow the money in key races by tracking campaign finance. We’ve expanded to Orange County, Long Beach and Pasadena. We spun up our popular newsletter, “Make It Make Sense,” which keeps you informed on what goes on after the election. This year, we added a pre-game to the newsletter and brought you up to speed on recent big elections ahead of this primary election day.

What is Voter Game Plan+

Now we’re launching another new experiment. We call it Voter Game Plan+. This feature will offer you a new toolkit of features to enhance your voting research experience. Here's how it works:

• If you already support LAist’s work as a member, thank you. You’ll have full access to these new tools.
• If you haven’t yet taken the step of joining the LAist member ranks, we are asking for a small, one-time payment of $7 for these additional features through the Nov. 3 mid-term election.

All of our voter guides remain free for all to use, and you can still submit your questions to our reporters and we’ll get them answered.

Why ask for money? This nominal fee will help offset the cost of producing these specific guides and tools, as well as the overall Voter Game Plan, which takes the equivalent of at least two journalists working full-time for a year to produce every election cycle.

As part of VGP+, you will be able to match your interests and topical positions against 14 candidates in the L.A. mayoral race through an interactive quiz. And the California governor's race quiz launches later this week.

We’re also offering a way to follow and save your favorite candidates across all races. This tool will be useful if you want a printable list of choices to take to the ballot box, or if you just want to keep track of how you voted when the general election comes around in November. And there are more features to come.

Our ask to you

With VGP+, LAist continues our tradition of working hard to make elections and long ballots less intimidating and giving voters more context and support for making informed decisions.

This is not a paywall, and you are not under any obligation to purchase VGP+. But we are asking this: Has LAist’s Voter Game Plan saved you time and given you confidence at the ballot box? If the answer is yes, we’d be very grateful for your support.

A fire has broken out on an oil and gas platform about 6.6 miles offshore from Santa Barbara.

The fire was reported just after 7 a.m. on Monday. Onboard crew members were unable to contain it. The 26 workers were evacuated, and two minor injuries were reported.

Santa Barbara County, Santa Barbara City and Ventura County firefighters, as well as the Santa Barbara Harbor Patrol and the U.S. Coast Guard, are involved in efforts to contain the blaze.

There's no word on what started the fire.

This is a developing story.