Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Small cities say they're getting shortchanged
    A blue sign with white letters is on a metal pole. If reads: City of Santa Clarita and includes an image of a tree and a Spanish style building along road.
    Santa Clarita is one of several cities who told LAist they think Measure A's local solutions fund is unevenly distributed.

    Topline:

    For the first time, L.A. County's Measure A sales tax is providing dedicated homelessness funding directly to all 88 cities. But local leaders in some smaller cities say residents are paying way more into the tax than they're seeing spent on their streets.

    The numbers: The new half-cent sales tax generates about $1 billion annually, including $96 million this year for the Local Solutions Fund divided among cities. Santa Clarita residents contribute an estimated $21.8 million but receive $476,000. Torrance generates about $26 million but gets $559,000.

    How it's divided: Los Angeles gets 57% of the fund ($55 million). The formula is based mostly on each city's Point-in-Time homeless count from the past two years. The remaining 10% is based on extremely low-income households.

    How cities are using it: Cities can use the funds on shelter, housing, prevention and more. L.A. is spending its entire allocation to keep 1,100 shelter beds open. Pasadena is using funds to keep people in rental housing as federal subsidies expire. Burbank says the eligible use guidelines are too narrow and don't allow enough flexibility.

    What's next: The county will track how each city uses its funds and publish the information in a public database. Cities will also receive separate Measure A funding for affordable housing development through the new L.A. County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency.

    For the first time, L.A. County's homelessness sales tax is providing dedicated funding directly to all 88 cities — a key selling point of Measure A that was supposed to empower local leaders to tackle the growing crisis in their own communities.

    But some local leaders say they're still getting shortchanged.

    The new half-cent sales tax is expected to generate about $1 billion annually for homeless services and affordable housing in L.A. County. That includes about $96 million this year for the county’s new Local Solutions Fund, a pot of money divided up between L.A.’s municipalities.

    Officials from some smaller cities told LAist residents are paying way more into Measure A than they’re seeing spent on their streets.

    “There is still an imbalance between what our residents contribute and what comes directly back to our community to address homelessness locally,” said Tracey Sullivan, community preservation manager for the city of Santa Clarita.

    Santa Clarita’s taxpayers will contribute an estimated $21.8 million this year under Measure A, she said. The city is getting $476,000 from the local solutions fund, according to L.A. County’s full breakdown of the allocations.

    “They deserve to see their dollars reinvested directly into our community and the impact they make,” Sullivan said.

    The city of Torrance is expected to generate about $26 million annually through the Measure A half-penny sales tax, but will receive about $559,00 in local homelessness funding, according to the city’s mayor, George Chen.

    “We strongly believe that allocations should be more proportional to each municipality’s tax contribution and to the level of homelessness services already in place,” Chen said.

    The frustration echoes concerns these cities had with Measure H, the previous quarter-cent sales tax that Measure A replaced last year. That’s why Measure A was different, including some dedicated local funding, according to Carter Hewgley, senior director at L.A. County’s Homeless Initiative.

    “ I think the Local Solutions Fund is recognizing that we hear your frustrations, and that it really matters for communities to have some agency in how their own community serves its most vulnerable members,” Hewgley said.

    Smaller cities say it’s still not enough. With many cities now facing budget shortfalls, those dollars are sorely-needed. Burbank is getting about $309,000 this year through the new funding stream.

    “The current amount of funding is not adequate to support the programs and services needed to address the city’s homeless,” said Kasey Lee, Burbank’s housing development manager.

    How the funds are divvied up

    As the county’s largest city, Los Angeles is getting roughly $55 million this year from the fund, or 57% of the entire local solutions fund. Long Beach is getting about $4.9 million and Lancaster $2.4 million.

    Smaller cities with far fewer unhoused residents are pulling in far less. Ranchos Palos Verdes is allocated about $38,000 through Measure A’s local fund, and Manhattan Beach is getting $41,ooo.

    The specific funding formula to determine which city gets what was approved by the L.A. County Board of Supervisors in March — after fierce debate. County officials considered various funding formulas, with cities favoring the option that afforded them the most funding.

    The county ultimately approved a formula that is based mostly on a city’s official point-in-time Homeless Count results from the past two years.

    The remaining 10% of the funding formula is based on the number of extremely low-income households in the city, as reported by census data. That’s meant to reflect people at-risk for homelessness, unhoused students and people living with others who aren’t counted in annual tallies, according to county officials.

    This formula could change in future budget years, but that would require approval by the Board of Supervisors.

    How cities are using local funds

    While the funds have been allocated and are already being spent by some cities, others are still working to finalize their plans.

    Some are using their new county dollars to keep shelters or other services open that would otherwise be lost to local budget cuts.

    The city of Los Angeles is spending the entirety of its $55 million to keep 1,100 existing shelter beds open that it would probably have had to cut, according to county officials.

    Pasadena is using its $867,000 primarily on rental subsidies, to prevent dozens of renters relying on federal housing vouchers from losing housing.

    Hundreds of federal rental vouchers are expiring in L.A. County, as a COVID-19 pandemic era infusion of emergency funding sunsets. The Trump administration has proposed deeper cuts to housing vouchers which would affect thousands in the region. Those cuts are still being negotiated in Congress.

    Cities can use their allocations for whatever homeless solutions they want, including shelter, permanent housing, outreach and prevention services. The eligible use guidelines are rooted in the language of Measure A, Hewgley said.

    But there’s some things it won’t cover, and the county has been working those details out with several cities, officials said. For example, if a city proposed to clear a tent encampment, their local solutions dollars could pay to provide shelter to the displaced encampment population, but it would not cover debris removal. The city would need to cover that with another source of funding.

    Burbank officials said the guidelines don’t allow enough flexibility.

    “The biggest concern regarding Measure A and the Local Solutions Funds are that the eligible uses are narrow,” Lee said.

    Torrance is using its dollars mostly to operate a 40-bed tiny homes village. In addition to fair funding, Mayor George Chen said he wants the county to prioritize more Measure A dollars for treatment facilities for substance abuse and mental illness.

    “Without a substantially higher and more predictable funding stream, cities like Torrance cannot plan and budget for the long-term operations required to stabilize and serve unhoused residents,” he said.

    Santa Clarita is splitting its funding between two local nonprofit service providers that recently opened new homeless shelters. The city’s officials said there needs to be more transparency around Measure A, so that residents can clearly see how money is spent and if results are achieved.

    L.A. County’s Hewgley said the county will be tracking how each city uses its funds, and eventually publishing that information in a public database.

    In addition to the local funding for homeless services, Measure A will soon give L.A.’s 88 cities separate dedicated local funding for affordable housing development.

    Santa Clarita, which gets $476,000 for homeless services, expects to get nearly $3.5 million in additional Measure A funding through the new L.A. County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency.

  • Sheriff says ICE agents will be present
    A man in a beige law enforcement uniform stands behind a mic and podium. Another man in a unform stands to his right and a third man is standing to his left wearing a navy blue suit. A multi-colored soccer ball rests on the podium beside him.
    L.A. County Sheriff Robert Luna (center) confirmed Monday that ICE will play a role in World Cup security. He spoke beside L.A. County District Attorney Nathan Hochman (left) and LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell.

    Topline:

    L.A. County Sheriff Robert Luna confirmed Monday that ICE will play a role in World Cup security, but said he's been told they won't conduct immigration enforcement.

    Why now: He made the comments today at a news conference on law enforcement's plans for the tournament, and said he'd been speaking directly with the head of Homeland Security in the Los Angeles area.

    Why it matters: The World Cup is coming to Los Angeles at exactly the year mark since immigration agents ramped up arrests in the region. Masked agents in neighborhoods across the county sparked protests and widespread fear, and ICE arrests in the L.A. area last year tripled.

    Read on… for more on what officials had to say about ICE and security at the upcoming World Cup.

    L.A. County Sheriff Robert Luna confirmed Monday that ICE will play a role in World Cup security, but said he's been told federal agents won't conduct immigration enforcement.

    He made the comments at a news conference on law enforcement's plans for the tournament, and said he'd been speaking directly with the head of Homeland Security in the Los Angeles area.

    "There will be federal agents," Luna said. " Because it's gonna take all of us to make sure that all the venues, the scoped and unscoped events, are secure."

    SoFi Stadium is set to host eight tournament matches, including the U.S. team opener against Paraguay on June 12. Los Angeles will also host a historic match three days later when Iran is set to take the field in Inglewood, making the U.S. the first host nation in World Cup history to be at war with a participating country.

    Luna said the federal government had said that civil immigration enforcement would not occur at the tournament. But he made no guarantees.

    " They told us that specifically would not be occurring at any of the games. Any of that's subject to change," he said. "But I have trust that they're giving me the appropriate information because if that starts occurring, we're gonna have a whole new host of problems."

    In a statement to LAist, Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis wrote that Department of Homeland Security is working with federal, state, local and international partners.

    “The safety and security of the American people and the millions of visitors attending these events remain our highest priority," Bis wrote in an email. "DHS will continue leveraging every available authority, technology, and partnership to protect the Homeland while ensuring the World Cup remains safe, secure, and successful for everyone involved.”

    Luna is the latest official to confirm that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement will play a role in the tournament. Kathryn Schloessman, who leads L.A.'s World Cup host committee, told reporters last month that ICE would be at the World Cup, and that its presence was typical at these types of major events.

    ICE has two main branches: Enforcement and Removal Operations, which detains and deports people, and Homeland Security Investigations, which conducts international criminal investigations.

    Todd Lyons, the former head of ICE, said at a congressional hearing earlier this year that it would be ICE’s investigatory branch, not its enforcement division, playing a key role in World Cup security.

    Still, some in L.A. aren't satisfied. The World Cup is coming to Los Angeles at exactly the year mark since immigration agents ramped up arrests in the region. Masked agents in neighborhoods across the county sparked protests and widespread fear, and ICE arrests in the L.A. area last year tripled.

    SoFi Stadium workers represented by Unite Here Local 11 have threatened to strike over ICE's role in the tournament. They'll vote on whether or not to authorize a strike later this week.

  • Sponsored message
  • Critics say state overhaul benefits Big Oil
    An oil refinery comprised of tall towers and heavy machinery is seen at dusk. Smoke arises from one of the towers in the middle of the photo.
    An oil refinery in Carson on May 29, 2024. A new California rule that would promote cleaner fuels was rejected by a state law office this week.

    Topline:

    California air regulators on Friday approved a contentious overhaul of the state’s carbon market, creating a program that could steer billions of dollars in free pollution permits to oil refineries and other major polluters over the objections of environmental groups, key lawmakers and three of the board’s own members.

    Why now? Ten members of the California Air Resources Board voted to adopt the changes to its cap-and-invest program after two days of lengthy hearings, including a full day dedicated to hundreds of public comments.

    How we got here: The overhaul followed intensive lobbying by the oil industry as well as pressure from Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration to help keep refineries operating in the state amid rising gas prices.

    The context:The approval sets up a potential budget fight in Sacramento. The Legislative Analyst’s Office projects that quarterly auction revenue for state climate programs will drop from roughly $4 billion a year to about $2 billion under the new overhaul.

    Read on... for more on the overhaul and its implications.

    California air regulators on Friday approved a contentious overhaul of the state’s carbon market, creating a program that could steer billions of dollars in free pollution permits to oil refineries and other major polluters over the objections of environmental groups, key lawmakers and three of the board’s own members.

    Ten members of the California Air Resources Board voted to adopt the changes to its cap-and-invest program after two days of lengthy hearings, including a full day dedicated to hundreds of public comments.

    The overhaul followed intensive lobbying by the oil industry as well as pressure from Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration to help keep refineries operating in the state amid rising gas prices.

    The approval sets up a potential budget fight in Sacramento. The Legislative Analyst’s Office projects that quarterly auction revenue for state climate programs will drop from roughly $4 billion a year to about $2 billion under the new overhaul.

    Such a shortfall would effectively zero out programs lawmakers spent last year fighting to fund: affordable housing, public transit, drinking water in low-income communities and pollution monitoring in California’s most polluted neighborhoods.

    The governor’s office praised the measure as a compromise that balanced economic uncertainty with the state’s climate goals. Refinery closures and the Iran-Israel war have driven average California gas prices above $6 a gallon.

    Newsom, in a statement, used the moment to draw a contrast with President Donald Trump.

    “While Trump sows ongoing chaos and uncertainty, California is staying focused by protecting our economy, safeguarding public health, and doubling down on the clean energy future all Californians deserve,” he said.

    Environmentalists warned the changes to the program amount to a giveaway to the fossil fuel industry that weakens California’s only program setting a firm cap on greenhouse gas emissions.

    Katelyn Roedner Sutter, California senior director for the Environmental Defense Fund, called the decision “deeply misguided” for prioritizing polluters over communities.

    “Newsom’s air regulators are handing billions to oil executives at the expense of our climate, health, and affordability for working families in a rushed process that has shortchanged meaningful public participation,” said Bahram Fazeli, policy director at Communities for a Better Environment.

    How the program works — and what changes

    California’s 13-year-old carbon market forces major polluters to buy permits while the state lowers the overall cap each year. Friday’s vote will reduce those permits – and creates a new subsidy program carved out of the market.

    The program, which may still see changes, could make available a new pool of free pollution permits available to industry valued at as much as $4 billion. Companies that pledge to invest in clean energy and efficiency may qualify for the permits in exchange for investments in clean energy.

    The pool will be capped at 118.3 million permits — the same number the air board has said must come off the market for California to hit its 2030 climate target. Environmentalists say the proposal risks wiping out those reductions.

    Half are reserved for the fossil fuel sector. A recent Berkeley analysis, by the chair of an independent committee that oversees the carbon market, found refineries could end up with more free permits than they need to cover their emissions.

    The air board has defended the design. Officials say the credits will go only to companies undertaking decarbonization projects, will be limited and temporary and can be clawed back if companies misuse them. The plan, they say, is meant to keep California refineries operating at a time of mounting closures and global market pressure. According to air regulators, the amended program will spur clean-energy investment as Trump cuts federal support.

  • What we know about vote tallies in LA and OC
    An election worker moves vote by mail ballots stacked on large carts.
    L.A. County's Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk has prep underway to begin tallying mail-in ballots for the June 2 primary election.

    Topline:

    With the primary election tomorrow, we're getting an early look at the total number of votes by mail and in person ahead of the Tuesday 8 p.m. deadline to cast your ballot.

    Keep reading ... for the latest on votes returned to date and what to watch for in the days and weeks ahead.

    Here's what you should know about the vote totals currently released:

    Keep in mind that June 9 will be the final day for votes postmarked by June 2 to arrive at county elections offices, so the bottom line on the vote totals won't be known until then.

    In L.A. County, the combined tallied votes as of Sunday add up to about 10% of registered voters.

    In Orange County, the current tallies represent about 22% of registered voters.

    How vote counts will be released

    L.A. County vote tallies

    In L.A. County, updates on the counting are expected to continue through June 26.

    Election night: After the polls close at 8 p.m., expect updates every 15 minutes or so through the early morning hours Wednesday.

    Post election night: Expect updated counts around 5 p.m. on the following days: June 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 18, 24 and 26.

    Final results must be certified by July 10.

    I thought it was an election NIGHT?

    That hasn't been true in quite a while. It takes a while to get results because after the initial tallies on election night, there are still many, many votes to count and more mail-in ballots are usually arriving.

    Here’s what we know so far:

    L.A. County turnout

    Los Angeles County has more than 5.8 million registered voters. As of Sunday, May 31:

    • 580,720 ballots have been processed
    • 95% voted by mail
    • 5% voted in person

    What's next:

    Orange County turnout

    Orange County has more than 1.8 million registered voters. As of Sunday, May 31:

    • 401,865 ballots have been processed
    • 95% voted by mail
    • 5% voted in person

    What's next:

    Expected total turnout

    Political Data Inc. is tracking ballot returns across California and in some high-profile races.

    As of midday Monday, turnout statewide was at 16%. While Democrats outnumber Republicans statewide by almost double, Republicans have returned more ballots pre-election (21% of their voters compared to 16% for Democrats).

    See the latest totals

    Why election day has turned into ballot-counting month

    Because of the increasing use of vote-by-mail ballots, the vote count has gotten longer, according to the California Voter Foundation. In an analysis, the organization found:

    • In November 2004, more than 80% of votes were counted within two days of Election Day, with 32.6% voting by mail. 
    • In June 2022, about 50% of ballots were counted within two days of Election Day, with more than 90% of people voting by mail. 
    • In November 2024, 66% of votes were counted within the first two days of Election Day, with 81% of the vote by mail.
    Chart shows the count of ballots within two days of a California election on the upswing after dipping to 50% in the June 2022 primary.
    A closer look at ballot counting times in California where an increasing number of vote-by-mail ballots has slowed ballot counts.
    (
    Courtesy California Voter Foundation
    )

    Election officials must physically open mail-in ballots and verify signatures.

    Kim Alexander, president of the California Voter Foundation, recently wrote about the ripple effect of turning in mail-in ballots by hand or in drop boxes on election day. She wrote for our partner newsroom CalMatters:

    "We turn in ballots in envelopes on Election Day that take time and care to process and cannot be processed until after Election Day. Processing these ballots — which account for as much as a quarter of all ballots cast — creates a bottleneck I like to call 'the pig in the python effect'. It prevents counties from doing other tasks they need to do to certify the results."

  • It isn't AI that's sidelined recent graduates

    Topline:

    New research reveals that companies are less likely to hire recent college grads into occupations that can be done remotely.

    The findings: Researchers speculate that employers are reluctant to put recent college graduates in a setting where it's harder to absorb lessons from coworkers. The researchers found the unemployment rate among younger college grads — those under the age of 29 — rose 20% after the pandemic. Unemployment rose as remote work grew fourfold, the researchers write. "Our analysis suggests that these trends are related, with remote work making it more difficult for managers to train and mentor new employees."

    AI not as big a factor: To see how the rise of AI chatbots may have contributed to rising unemployment among the younger set, the researchers used another index that divides occupations into those more exposed to AI, such as engineering and accounting, and those less exposed, such as teaching and nursing. They found exposure to AI didn't explain the divergence in unemployment rates in the 2022-24 time period. Remote workflows were much more of a driving force.

    The buzz on college campuses is that AI is disrupting the job market for young college graduates.

    But new research from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York finds that the culprit may be something else: remote work.

    An analysis of federal employment data, paired with a deep dive into the flexible work arrangements at one unnamed Fortune 500 tech company, reveals that companies are less likely to hire recent college grads into occupations that can be done remotely.

    Researchers speculate that employers are reluctant to put such workers in a setting where it's harder to absorb lessons from coworkers.

    The researchers found the unemployment rate among younger college grads — those under the age of 29 — rose 20% after the pandemic, while unemployment among older college grads fell slightly.

    The study compares unemployment rates pre-pandemic, from 2017 to 2019, with unemployment rates after the pandemic, from 2022 to 2024.

    Unemployment rose as remote work grew fourfold, the researchers write. "Our analysis suggests that these trends are related, with remote work making it more difficult for managers to train and mentor new employees."

    Remote work leads to less feedback on the job

    The research began with a look at how much feedback software engineers at a Fortune 500 tech company were getting, says Emma Harrington, an assistant professor of economics at the University of Virginia and one of the authors of the report.

    "What we saw was this pretty striking pattern that software engineers got about 20% more feedback if they were sitting near their colleagues than if they were distant from them," she says, adding that that was true even before the pandemic.

    But after the pandemic, feedback plummeted.

    "And that really hit young workers much harder," says Harrington. "It was these people who had the most to learn that really saw this deficit in feedback."

    The researchers then looked deeper into who was getting hired at the tech firm. Turns out, as the company embraced remote work, they switched away from hiring younger people.

    "So they used to hire a bunch of new grads for their software engineering jobs," Harrington says. "Then they shifted really towards hiring much older people, like a decade older on average."

    Later, the company pivoted again, implementing what Harrington calls a "pretty aggressive" return-to-office policy. At that point, the company resumed hiring new graduates.

    "So [there was] some sense that these problems with mentorship were translating into whom this firm was deciding to hire," she says.

    A look at the broader economy

    The researchers then wanted to see if what was happening at that single tech company was playing out in the broader economy.

    Using a widely-used index that measures how feasible it is to do a job from home, the team divided all occupations into two categories: "remotable," which included software engineering, and "non-remotable," which included mechanical engineering.

    They found the gap in unemployment between recent graduates and older workers was significantly higher in "remotable" jobs than in jobs that have to be done in person.

    The unemployment rate for younger grads in "remotable" jobs jumped by almost a full percentage point after the pandemic, while the unemployment rate among older grads fell marginally.

    They concluded that remote work explained nearly two-thirds of the rise in unemployment among young graduates during this period.

    "This relative increase in young people's unemployment coincided with the pandemic and has remained elevated since then, as have rates of remote work," the researchers write.

    AI isn't disrupting so many jobs for recent college grads — yet

    To see how the rise of AI chatbots may have contributed to rising unemployment among the younger set, the researchers used another index that divides occupations into those more exposed to AI, such as engineering and accounting, and those less exposed, such as teaching and nursing.

    They found exposure to AI didn't explain the divergence in unemployment rates in the 2022-24 time period. Remote workflows were much more of a driving force, Harrington says, while emphasizing that this could change.

    "It's always hard to make guesses about what's going to happen with generative AI," she says. "It's certainly possible that this story could really change over the next few years."

    Researchers at the London School of Economics have reached a similar conclusion — that remote work is having a clearer impact on early-career hiring than AI — in a working paper examining new hires in the U.S., the U.K., Canada and Australia.

    Regardless of the cause, the New York Fed report warns that a high unemployment rate among young college grads is concerning.

    "Early-career experiences can have lasting consequences," the researchers write. "Research finds that individuals who began looking for jobs in slacker labor markets tend to have lower earnings and slower career progression relative to comparable peers who began their job search in better market conditions."

    Copyright 2026 NPR