Today is Giving Tuesday!

Give back to local trustworthy news; your gift's impact will go twice as far for LAist because it's matched dollar for dollar on this special day. 
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • LA County to ban law enforcement from masking
    A crowd gathered holding signs
    L.A. County Supervisors Janice Hahn and Lindsey Horvath announce new ordinance banning law enforcement officers from wearing masks in unincorporated L.A. County.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to move forward with a proposed ordinance that prohibits law enforcement officers from concealing their identities while interacting with the public in unincorporated areas of the county.

    The County ordinance: The proposal would require all officers and agents — local, state or federal — to refrain from wearing masks or other facial coverings in unincorporated L.A. County. It makes some exceptions, including for undercover and SWAT personnel.

    Federal response: The ordinance mirrors California’s first-in-the-nation state law passed in September. The Trump administration has said its agents will not comply with California’s mask ban. The Department of Justice sued California in November, challenging it.

    What's next?: The supervisors approved the first reading of the proposed ordinance in a 4-0 vote, with Supervisor Kathryn Barger abstaining. The supervisors are expected to vote a second time on Dec. 9 to adopt the ordinance, which would go into effect 30 days later.

    The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to move forward with a proposed ordinance that prohibits law enforcement officers from concealing their identities while interacting with the public in unincorporated areas of the county.

    The proposal would require all officers and agents — local, state or federal — to refrain from wearing masks or other facial coverings. It also mandates that they display visible identification, including their agency name along with either their last name or badge number.

    Supervisor Janice Hahn said the concealment of officers’ identities during these raids undermines public trust and creates unnecessary fear.

    "We need to declare in no uncertain terms that in Los Angeles County, police do not hide their faces," said Hahn, who sponsored and co-authored the ordinance. "That is our expectation, and this ordinance will now make it a local law."

    In a statement to LAist, federal immigration officials defended officers wearing masks. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said L.A. County's ordinance is unconstitutional.

    “Our officers wear masks to protect themselves from being doxed and targeted by highly sophisticated gangs like Tren de Aragua and MS-13, “ McLaughlin said in the statement. “Criminal rings, murderers, and rapists who attempt to go after the officers and their families."

    She also noted a provision of the U.S. Constitution that says federal law prevails over conflicting state law.

    McLaughlin said L.A. County’s proposed ordinance would “violate the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, which makes it clear that Los Angeles does not control federal law enforcement.”

    The supervisors approved the first reading of the proposed ordinance in a 4-0 vote, with Supervisor Kathryn Barger abstaining.

    They are expected to vote a second time on Dec. 9 to adopt the ordinance. If adopted, the new law would go into effect 30 days later.

    Enforcement questions

    According to county officials, violations would be punishable as infractions or misdemeanors. But it’s uncertain how L.A. County will enforce the new ordinance. It mirrors California’s first-in-the-nation state law passed in September.

    The Trump administration has said its agents will not comply with California’s mask ban. And the Department of Justice sued California in November, challenging it.

    Hahn said L.A. County will wait to see the outcome of that lawsuit before determining how to enforce the new ordinance.

    “We’re going to wait until it plays out in court,” she said.

    County officials said the ordinance was prompted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement sweeps that began in June.

    Federal agents wearing plainclothes, tactical gear and masks conducted what county supervisors describe in the motion as “violent and indiscriminate operations in immigrant communities.”

    “ These agents hide their faces and refuse to wear badges,” Hahn said. “They pull people into unmarked vans at gunpoint, and then they wonder why people resist arrest.”

    “This is how authoritarian secret police behave, not legitimate law enforcement in a democracy,” she added.

    Between June and August, the Department of Homeland Security arrested at least 5,000 people in Los Angeles County, including people who had not committed crimes, those with pending legal status and visa holders.

    Exemptions

    The Board of Supervisors originally approved a motion on July 29 directing County Counsel to draft the ordinance.

    County officials said that when officers conceal their faces, it becomes difficult for residents to distinguish actual law enforcement from imposters, increasing the risk of criminal impersonation.

    “It’s not public safety, it’s intimidation, plain and simple,” said Supervisor Lindsey Horvath. “Los Angeles County is not going to tolerate it. When the public cannot tell who a real officer is, everyone is at risk.”

    Several immigrants’ rights activists showed up at the Board of Supervisors meeting on Tuesday to support the county’s move.

    “It’s good that it's recognized that this is a problem, but the only way we're gonna actually do anything about it is to keep relying on the community to come out and support,” said Quetzal Ceja, an organizer for South Bay day laborers.

    The ordinance includes several exemptions where law enforcement authorities can wear face coverings, including undercover and SWAT operations. They can also wear helmets and other equipment for health reasons or protection against environmental hazards.

  • Huntington Beach loses in court
    A man wearing white holds a sign that reads "ICE out of California. Support SB 54!" Behind him is a woman and a cardboard cutout of Donald Trump.
    Senate Bill 54, also known as the California Values Act, was passed and signed by the governor in 2017.

    Topline:

    A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit from Huntington Beach challenging the state’s sanctuary law. That law prohibits local law enforcement from assisting with federal immigration enforcement, except in the case of serious crimes.

    Backstory: The decision marks Huntington Beach’s second failed attempt to sue California over the sanctuary law, SB 54, known as the California Values Act. This time, the city had legal help from America First Legal, a conservative law firm founded by Steven Miller, the architect of President Trump’s aggressive immigration enforcement strategy.

    Read on ... for more about the court battle and the city's options going forward.

    A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit from Huntington Beach challenging the state’s sanctuary law. That law prohibits local law enforcement from assisting with federal immigration enforcement, except in the case of serious crimes.

    The decision marks Huntington Beach’s second failed attempt to sue California over the sanctuary law, SB 54, known as the California Values Act. This time, the city had legal help from America First Legal, a conservative law firm founded by Steven Miller, the architect of President Donald Trump’s aggressive immigration enforcement strategy.

    Shortly before Trump took office in January, taking office, America First Legal sent letters to hundreds of elected officials in cities and states with sanctuary laws, warning them that they could face legal consequences for allegedly impeding federal immigration enforcement.

    What did the city argue?

    The city argued that SB 54 is unconstitutional and that prohibiting the city from cooperating with federal immigration authorities inhibits its ability to combat crime.

    The city was joined in the lawsuit by Chad Bianco, the Riverside County sheriff and 2026 gubernatorial candidate.

    How to keep tabs on Huntington Beach

    • Huntington Beach holds City Council meetings on the first and third Tuesday of each month at 6 p.m. at City Hall, 2000 Main St.
    • You can also watch City Council meetings remotely on HBTV via Channel 3 or online, or via the city’s website. (You can also find videos of previous council meetings there.)
    • The public comment period happens toward the beginning of meetings.
    • The city generally posts agendas for City Council meetings on the previous Friday. You can find the agenda on the city’s calendar or sign up there to have agendas sent to your inbox.

    What did the judge rule?

    U.S. District Court Judge Sunshine S. Sykes ruled that, based on precedent, the city lacks standing to sue the state on constitutional grounds in federal court.

    Read the judge's ruling.

    What’s next?

    The complaint was dismissed without prejudice, meaning the city could try again to challenge the sanctuary law in court. No word yet on whether the city will do that.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is @jillrep.79.

    • For instructions on getting started with Signal, see the app's support page. Once you're on, you can type my username in the search bar after starting a new chat.
    • And if you're comfortable just reaching out by email I'm at jreplogle@scpr.org

  • Sponsor
  • More relief coming to 39K LA County residents
    Patients rest in a hallway in the emergency room area at Providence St. Mary Medical Center on Jan. 27, 2021 in Apple Valley.
    Patients rest in an emergency room hallway.

    Topline:

    If you’re an L.A. County resident with medical debt, keep an eye on your mailbox in the coming days. The county may have erased some of it.

    Why now: The county health department says another wave of notices are going out to 39,000 residents whose debt has been abolished, totaling about $180 million. The first notices hit back in May.

    The backstory: So far, the county has erased roughly three quarters of its $500 million goal to eliminate medical debt, one of the leading causes of bankruptcy in the U.S. It’s happening under a pilot program that launched last December with the nonprofit Undue Medical Debt, which is purchasing the debt for a fraction of the cost. The program may expand with outside help.

    What should I know? The pilot may not eliminate all of your debt, and it has certain eligibility requirements. Official notices will come from Undue Medical Debt and L.A. County (see here for examples). If you don’t get a letter, more resources for medical debt relief can be found on the county’s website.

    Go deeper:

  • Study shows improved mental health, here's how

    Topline:

    A new study out last week in JAMA Network Open found that cutting down on social media use even for a week can significantly reduce mental health symptoms in young adults.

    Why it matters: It's part of a growing body of research that shows that taking breaks from scrolling and posting can be a mental health boon, especially for young people.

    2 weeks of observation, 1 week of detox: During the first two weeks of the study, the app gave Torous and his colleagues baseline data. At the end of those two weeks, the researchers shared that data with participants and gave them standardized questionnaires for symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia and loneliness. Then, they asked whether they wanted to try a weeklong social media detox.

    Read on... for the results and tips from experts.

    If you have ever sworn off social media for a week or two because you sensed it was feeding your anxiety or dampening your mood, you may be on to something.

    A new study out last week in JAMA Network Open found that cutting down on social media use even for a week can significantly reduce mental health symptoms in young adults.

    It's part of a growing body of research that shows that taking breaks from scrolling and posting can be a mental health boon, especially for young people.

    For example, a recently published meta-analysis found that limiting social media is tied to a statistically significant boost in "subjective well-being."

    Unreliable data vs. an objective measure

    Most studies on the impacts of social media ask users to recall how much time they spend on their phones or these platforms, as well as other aspects of their health like mood and sleep. But that data is often unreliable, says psychiatrist John Torous, director of the Division of Digital Psychiatry at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston and author of the new study.

    "If you ask me, 'How much have you slept in the past week, and can you guess your screen time?" says Torous, "I don't think I would be right."

    In the new study, Torus and his colleagues tried to get a more objective measure of social media use. They recruited 373 young adults ages 18 to 24. For the first two weeks, participants used social media like they normally would and allowed researchers to record information from their phones about their social media use, their step counts and their sleep. They had participants download an app that sent the data directly to the researchers.

    2 weeks of observation, 1 week of detox

    During the first two weeks of the study, the app gave Torous and his colleagues baseline data. At the end of those two weeks, the researchers shared that data with participants and gave them standardized questionnaires for symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia and loneliness. Then, they asked whether they wanted to try a weeklong social media detox.

    "We had 80% of participants opt into the detox," says Dr. Elombe Calvert, a co-author of the study.

    At baseline, the participants were spending about two hours a day on the five social media apps the study was looking at: Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and X (formerly Twitter). "During the detox, it fell to like 30 minutes a day," says Calvert.

    By the end of that third week, Calvert and the team found a 16% reduction in anxiety symptoms, a 24% decrease in depression symptoms and a 14.5% decrease in insomnia symptoms. "So, it's very effective," says Calvert.

    Torous notes that the results mirror what his and his colleagues' patients report. "We definitely have had patients telling us for some time that they've tried digital detoxes on their own [and] that they find it useful," he says.

    Most participants in the study, however, did not score high enough in the mental health screenings to qualify for a mental health diagnosis, notes Torous. Only a minority showed elevated levels of symptoms at baseline, and this group showed "greater improvement," he says.

    Striking results

    "It usually takes eight to 12 weeks of intensive psychotherapy to see those kinds of reductions in mental health symptoms," says psychologist Mitch Prinstein, chief of strategy and integration at the American Psychological Association. "So if you can get those with just one week of change in behavior, wow!"

    What's also striking, adds Prinstein, is that as the participants cut back on social media use, their screen time didn't go down. They were doing other things on their devices.

    "So, it really helps us see that it's not just your screen that's a problem," he says. "It might be social media in particular."

    Ready to get some relief yourself? Here are a few tips from experts:

    1. Block out time

    Using social media mindfully can help, says Prinstein. That can take the form of setting goals for when we check our phones and for what. For example, setting aside 10-minute blocks at specific times to get rid of notifications or check headlines or unread messages. "Doing so seems to work and keeps us from getting distracted or going down rabbit holes for hours," he says. 

    2. Make it harder to log on and scroll

    Removing apps from the home screen and disabling notifications from social media apps can help too, says psychiatrist Amir Afkhami, at the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health at the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences. So does "logging out of the platform after use, which makes it a little bit harder to get back in," he says.

    3. Protect sleep

    For many people, social media use affects mood through "nighttime scrolling" by disrupting sleep and contributing to insomnia, says Afkhami. For those individuals, restricting evening or nighttime use is key, he adds. In a study published this year, Torous and his co-authors recommend "at least one hour of tech-free time before bed, to mentally disconnect from the online world and promote adequate, restful sleep." Parents can help teenagers build a habit of not using social media at night by designating bedrooms as "tech-free zones" at night, according to Torous and his colleagues. 

    4. Stroll more, scroll less

    For those who turn to social media during periods of boredom, Afkhami recommends replacing screen time with physical activity like a walk or a run. "The initial hump is a little bit higher," he says, "but over time, actually, patients end up liking it more because they get more of a dopamine surge than they do with social media." 

    5. Seek treatment, if more is going on

    For many people, social media overuse is linked to underlying mental health conditions such as depression, anxiety and ADHD, adds Afkhami. And while cutting back on social media might help alleviate some of those symptoms, he recommends that they also seek treatment from a mental health care provider.
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • US air travelers without ID will be charged $45

    Topline:

    Air travelers in the U.S. without a REAL ID will be charged a $45 fee beginning in February, the Transportation Security Administration announced Monday.

    Why now: The updated ID has been required since May, but passengers without it have so far been allowed to clear security with additional screening and a warning. The Department of Homeland Security says 94% of passengers are already compliant and that the new fee is intended to encourage travelers to obtain the ID.

    Some backstory: REAL ID is a federally compliant state-issued license or identification card that meets enhanced requirements mandated in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

    Read on... for what you need to know about the fee.

    Air travelers in the U.S. without a REAL ID will be charged a $45 fee beginning in February, the Transportation Security Administration announced Monday.

    The updated ID has been required since May, but passengers without it have so far been allowed to clear security with additional screening and a warning. The Department of Homeland Security says 94% of passengers are already compliant and that the new fee is intended to encourage travelers to obtain the ID.

    REAL ID is a federally compliant state-issued license or identification card that meets enhanced requirements mandated in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

    Obtaining the ID — indicated by a white star in a yellow circle in most states — means taking more documents to the motor vehicle agency than most states require for regular IDs. It was supposed to be rolled out in 2008 but the implementation had been repeatedly delayed.

    Beginning Feb. 1, travelers 18 and older flying domestically without a REAL ID and who don't have another accepted form of ID on them, such as a passport, will pay the non-refundable fee to verify their identity through TSA's alternative "Confirm.ID" system.


    TSA officials said that paying the fee does not guarantee verification, and travelers whose identities cannot be verified may be turned away. If approved, however, the verification covers a 10-day travel period.

    The fee can be paid online before arriving at the airport. Travelers can also pay online at the airport before entering the security line, but officials said the process may take up to 30 minutes.

    The TSA initially proposed an $18 charge for passengers without a REAL ID, but officials said Monday they raised it after realizing the alternative identification program would cost more than anticipated.

    Other acceptable forms of ID include military IDs, permanent resident cards and photo IDs from federally recognized tribal nations. TSA also accepts digital IDs through platforms such as Apple Wallet, Google Wallet and Samsung Wallet at more than 250 airports in the U.S.
    Copyright 2025 NPR