Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Dozens of people double-counted in L.A. data
    Tents line a sidewalk in front of a tall white building.
    Tents line the sidewalk in front of L.A. City Hall this March.
    Topline: An LAist review has found major errors in a recent data release that tracks where encampments have been cleared in L.A. and how many people were brought inside from each council district.

    What we found: The data is the first known public listing of each encampment operation for Inside Safe, a program started a year and a half ago by L.A. Mayor Karen Bass to bring people living in encampments into motels. Officials who prepared the spreadsheet in April acknowledge it had the following errors:

    • It incorrectly labeled encampments located in multiple districts as only being in a single district. In one of those operations, 116 people were incorrectly labeled as all coming inside from Council District 1. The vast majority — about 100 — were actually in Council District 13, according to that district’s spokesperson. 
    • It double-counted about 50 people who left Inside Safe motels, returned to an encampment, and then re-entered an Inside Safe motel.
    • It listed incorrect dates for when encampment clearings took place. Among the problems: It showed an Inside Safe operation as starting before the mayor took office. The program didn’t launch until after she was sworn in.

    Who is responsible: Bevin Kuhn, who is the interim data chief for the L.A. Homeless Services Authority, took responsibility for the problems in an interview with LAist. She said the data didn’t get the high-level vetting that it should have and fell off her radar. She said the errors were fixed this week in a corrected dataset sent for the council.

    Why it matters: L.A. residents continue to rank homelessness as a top concern. Taxpayers are spending hundreds of millions of dollars on Inside Safe to help get people off the streets and into motels.

    As L.A. residents continue to rank homelessness as a top concern, taxpayers are spending hundreds of millions of dollars on Mayor Karen Bass’ signature program Inside Safe to help get people off the streets and into motels.

    Now an LAist review has found major errors in a recent data release that tracks where encampments have been cleared and how many people were brought inside from each council district.

    It comes as some council members have questioned a lack of details about how the mayor’s office chooses which encampments to offer motel rooms to.

    The data was the first — and so far only — detailed public listing of each encampment operation for Inside Safe, a program that started a year and a half ago.

    About the data and errors

    The data was provided to the City Council back in April by the L.A. Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA), after the council ordered officials to gather it.

    As LAist was analyzing the data last week, we reached out to all 15 council offices to verify the accuracy. That’s when problems with the data were pointed out to LAist by officials — problems that hadn’t previously been acknowledged publicly.


    Click to compare the spreadsheets


    Officials who prepared the spreadsheet acknowledge it had the following errors:

    • It incorrectly labeled encampments located in multiple districts as only being in a single district. In one of those operations, 116 people were incorrectly labeled as all coming inside from Council District 1. The vast majority — about 100 — were actually in Council District 13, according to that district’s spokesperson. 
    • It double-counted about 50 people who left Inside Safe motels, returned to an encampment, and then re-entered an Inside Safe motel.
    • It listed incorrect dates for when encampment clearings took place. Among the problems: It showed an Inside Safe operation as starting before the mayor took office. The program didn’t launch until after she was sworn in.

    Officials at the Homeless Services Authority acknowledged the errors in an interview with LAist and issued a correction this week for the City Council. The agency is overseen by Bass and other officials appointed by the mayor and county supervisors.

    LAHSA official owns the errors

    “I will own the errors in that report,” said Bevin Kuhn, who has been overseeing data at LAHSA on an interim basis since February. That’s when the previous data chief — Emily Vaughn Henry — left, before this data was compiled.

    Kuhn was brought into the top data role at LAHSA by its CEO, Va Lecia Adams Kellum, who formerly worked with Kuhn at the Westside service provider St. Joseph Center.

    Kuhn said the data was compiled as she was starting in her new role, and that she did not take the time to thoroughly review the data before it went out for the council.

    “This report unfortunately fell off my personal radar,” Kuhn said.

    “There was nothing nefarious about it, and there was nothing hidden there.”

    LAHSA fixed the errors, and the corrected report sent to the city on Tuesday is “100% accurate,” Kuhn said.

    Kuhn said she’s learned to communicate if deadlines aren’t realistic, and to do a better job of educating staff to prevent data errors.

    Adams Kellum said she believes overall that LAHSA’s data is much more accurate than in the past, but that mistakes do still happen. She said she’s been working to get LAHSA staff to feel more comfortable asking for more time to make sure data reports are correct, and owning up to mistakes.

    “We know nothing will get better, and we won't be able to hone our interventions if we can't tell you what's working and what's not,” she told LAist.

    Timing: Homeless count numbers coming soon

    LAist discovered the errors as LAHSA prepares to release the widely-anticipated homeless count results on Friday.

    Asked why the public should trust the point in time results, Adams Kellum said it’s important to note that the data for that is overseen and validated by researchers at the University of Southern California.

    She acknowledged “data issues across our entire homeless delivery system,” noting that LAist has reported on many of them.

    “We've made great strides,” Adams Kellum said, adding that Kuhn “is making a great improvement in our ability to stand behind the numbers and also share with you where there's gaps.”

    “That's that transparency that we're trying to get to.”

    How to get involved

    If you’re concerned about this or anything else about the local homelessness response, you can contact your local elected representatives. LAHSA in particular is overseen by the L.A. mayor and City Council, as well as L.A. County Board of Supervisors.

    To find out who your city and county representatives are, click on the following links:

    LAHSA is governed by commissioners, who are appointed by the L.A. mayor and county Board of Supervisors. Click here for the list of LAHSA commissioners. The next commission meeting is on Friday morning, and members of the public can attend and speak in person or via Zoom. More info is available here.

    LAist also would like to hear from you. You can contact reporter Nick Gerda at ngerda@scpr.org.

    The backstory

    The data was collected under a City Council order in February, which was initiated by Councilmember Monica Rodriguez.

    “I requested the data because this information was not forthcoming from the mayor's office when we were requesting these reports” previously, Rodriguez told LAist in an interview.

    “My big problem is that there was a lot of dollars being spent, a lot of money being allocated, but there hasn't been a lot of accountability for who's getting what money, what is it going to — like, breaking down and distilling more of those details,” Rodriguez told LAist in an interview.

    The mayor’s office should be ensuring transparency and accuracy for data about the mayor’s key program, Rodriguez said.

    “The administrator of the program should be able to account for how the program operates and where the deployments are.”

    LAist requested an interview with Bass and her top homelessness advisor, Lourdes Castro Ramirez. They have not responded.

    Why there are still unanswered questions

    Many City Council members say Inside Safe is making a real difference in the lives of their constituents — housed and unhoused alike. More than 2,700 people have come inside under the program, as of the latest data, of whom about 1,900 are still known to be in shelter or housing.

    Still, lack of clarity around how decisions get made persists, which the City Council’s directive to collect data in February noted. The strategy “remains open to further definition,” states the motion.

    Asked how encampments are prioritized for Inside Safe, Mayor Bass’ office pointed LAist to a short description that says factors include “council district priorities, voluntary participation, encampment-specific needs (e.g., RVs, number of residents, size of encampment, safety/hazard issues, multiple jurisdictions), availability of interim housing, and service provider capacity."

    Her office did not respond to follow-up questions, including what "council district priorities" means and how they’re decided.

    Councilmember Bob Blumenfield, who chairs the council’s budget committee, called for “more transparency and accountability” about Inside Safe decisions in an interview with LAist.

    He credited the mayor’s office with trying to prioritize encampments for Inside Safe in “a rational way,” but said “the decision process is not necessarily clear or inclusive of the entire council.”

    “I think they're just trying to address a crisis. I don't think they have a clearly delineated process,” Blumenfield said.

    The City Council is now stepping up its push for transparency about that. As part of its budget approval for the new fiscal year, the council is requiring detailed data about each Inside Safe operation on a regular basis — including, for the first time, how encampments were chosen.

    As for the data errors uncovered by LAist, he said LAHSA’s data quality has been a longstanding problem and one that’s still “a big concern” for him.

    LAHSA officials “certainly have asked us for more money for admin, for data, and we've provided that every time we've been asked,” he added.

    “And we're spending a lot on making sure that they're resourced to provide the data.”

    Tell LAist: The state of homelessness in your neighborhood

  • Teachers, parents urged board to delay cuts
    A man with medium-light skin tone stands at the front of a classroom. In the foreground there are two young girls with long hair facing toward the front of the room.
    Los Angeles Unified is the second-largest employer in L.A. County with more than 83,000 employees in the 2025-26 school year.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles Unified School District rescheduled a Tuesday meeting where the board was expected to vote on layoffs as part of a larger plan to cut spending. Educators and parents have urged district leaders to delay the vote.

    Why delay? It’s not clear. LAist asked LAUSD for an explanation and when the public will receive more information about the proposed reduction in force (RIF). In a statement, a district spokesperson said board agendas are subject to change and that the proposed reduction in force would be presented at a future meeting. Tuesday’s meeting is currently re-scheduled for Feb. 17.

    The backstory: For the last two years, the district has relied on reserves to backfill a multi-billion-dollar deficit. There are more than 40% fewer students compared to the early 2000s and the district has not closed schools or significantly reduced staff as costs have increased. LAUSD hired more staff to support students during the pandemic, but the federal relief dollars that initially funded those positions are gone.

    What are the cuts? The district’s fiscal stabilization plan proposes layoffs in those “un-funded” positions, central office staff and at schools that support higher needs students.

    Unions push back: In a Friday letter, the unions representing LAUSD teachers, support staff and principals asked the board to delay the RIF vote until there is more information available about state funding and the public has more time to understand the proposed cuts. “The notion that these are dark times for education requiring harmful cuts when there are record high state revenues is fearmongering,” the letter states.

  • LA County is considering half cent bump
    A woman with medium-dark skin tone with dreadlocked hair in a bun wearing a green shirt as she speaks from a dais sitting in a cream colored chair.
    A proposal from Los Angeles County Supervisor Holly Mitchell is meant to make up for some federal funding cuts, most of which were to the county's healthcare system.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday will consider a proposal to place a plan on the ballot that, if passed, would raise the sales tax by half a cent to address federal funding cuts. The increase would bump the county’s sales tax to 10.25% — the highest allowed by state law.

    The backstory: L.A. County faces projected losses of $2.4 billion over the next three years as a result of President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” most of it to the county’s healthcare system. In just four months following the bill’s signing, the county lost an average of 1,000 people per day from Medi-Cal enrollment — over 120,000 people between July and November 2025, according to Supervisor Holly Mitchell.

    Children hit hard: During the same four-month period, more than 27,000 children under age 18 lost their Medi-Cal coverage, equating to nearly 200 children per day, according to Mitchell. The county also lost more than 70,000 CalFresh enrollees receiving food assistance, including approximately 27,000 who were children under age 18.

    Temporary tax: Under Mitchell’s proposal, which must be approved by voters, the sales tax would raise a billion dollars a year and expire in five years. Mitchell is proposing to place the measure on the June ballot.

  • World Series Game 7 moments and more
    A man wearing a white t-shirt with a small graphic on the front unboxes a bobblehead of Dodgers star Shohei Ohtani. The man holds the cardboard bobblehead box under his arm as he opens the plastic packaging holding the figurine.
    A fan unboxes his 50/50 Ohtani bobblehead on May 15, 2025, at Dodger Stadium.

    Topline:

    The Dodgers announced their promotional giveaway schedule for 2026 on Monday, and it includes some special bobblehead games commemorating the team's 2025 World Series repeat that are sure to be popular.

    Memorable playoff moments: There are two bobblehead series in particular that look like they could reach collectors item status. The first is a set of four bobbleheads depicting pivotal moments from the Dodgers' World Series Game 7 win over the Toronto Blue Jays, including Miguel Rojas' game-tying 9th inning home run (Friday, May 8), Will Smith's go-ahead home run in the 11th (Saturday, March 28), Mookie Betts' game-ending double play (Friday, June 19) and Yoshinobu Yamamoto's reaction to the final out from the mound (Wednesday, May 27).

    The Ohtani factor: The second is a pair of bobbleheads honoring Shohei Ohtani's "Greatest Game of All Time" on the mound and at the plate in Game 4 of the National League Championship Series against the Milwaukee Brewers when he struck out 10 batters and hit three home runs. The bobblehead giveaway honoring his hitting performance will be Friday, April 10, and the pitching one will be Wednesday, July 8.

    Go deeper: You can see the full schedule of promotional giveaways planned for the 2026 season here.

  • Hope remains for more eggs for Jackie and Shadow
    A wide view of two adult bald eagles snuggled up next to each on a tree branch in a mountain range.
    Big Bear's famous bald eagle couple, Jackie and Shadow, snuggled up side by side on their "Lookout Snag" on Saturday.

    Topline:

    After the famous bald eagle couple in Big Bear lost their eggs last month, fans are still holding out hope that they’ll lay a second round of eggs this season.

    Why it matters: Bald eagles generally have one clutch — the group of eggs laid in each nesting attempt — per season. But a replacement clutch is possible if the eggs don’t make it through the early incubation process, according to Friends of Big Bear Valley.

    The backstory: In January, nest watchers were saddened to see that the eggs were breached by ravens.

    What's next: But because the eggs were lost so early in the season, Jenny Voisard, the organization’s media manager, told LAist they’re hopeful there’s still time for another clutch.

    Go deeper: How to talk to children about Jackie and Shadow’s chick dying and other losses in life

    After Jackie and Shadow, the famous bald eagle couple in Big Bear, lost their eggs last month, fans are holding out hope that they’ll lay a second round of eggs this season.

    Bald eagles generally have one clutch — the group of eggs laid in each nesting attempt — per season. But a replacement clutch is possible if the eggs don’t make it through the early incubation process, according to Friends of Big Bear Valley.

    The nonprofit runs a popular YouTube livestream of the nest and Jackie and Shadow.

    In January, nest watchers were saddened to see the eggs were breached by ravens. But because the eggs were lost so early in the season, Jenny Voisard, the organization’s media manager, told LAist they’re hopeful there’s still time for another clutch.

    Jackie is typically fertile and able to lay eggs January through April each year, according to the organization. Several years ago, Jackie laid a second clutch after the eggs were broken or breached by ravens.

    Voisard said that while there’s no guarantees in nature, people are hopeful this isn’t the end of Big Bear’s nesting season.

    “Chicks are always welcome and we love them so much, but we love Jackie and Shadow,” she said. “We're going to remain optimistic.”

    What happened to the eggs?

    Jackie laid the first egg of the season on Jan. 23 and the second egg on Jan. 26 as thousands of fans watched online.

    By Jan. 30, viewers noticed that Jackie and Shadow had left their nest unattended for hours at a time.

    Friends of Big Bear Valley wondered if the eagles were practicing delayed incubation, and whether a third egg was on the way for the third season in a row, according to Voisard. The Big Bear bald eagles have practiced delayed incubation in previous seasons, which is when they don’t incubate full time until the last egg is laid, usually three days apart.

    An adult bald eagle is raising her left talon over a pair of white eggs laying in a nest of twigs.
    Jackie with the first and second egg of the season in January.
    (
    Friends of Big Bear Valley
    /
    YouTube
    )

    But that wasn’t the case this time.

    “When the raven was able to get so close, we had suspicions,” Voisard said. “Earlier in the day, we were examining and rewinding and looking at one of the eggs because it wasn't looking right to us.”

    The organization zoomed in with the livestream camera and confirmed an egg was cracked. A raven came back to the nest again later that day and breached both eggs.

    “The fact that the egg was broken could have signaled to the raven to come,” Voisard said.

    More bald eagles have been seen in the Big Bear area, and the animals’ territorial activity could have also contributed to Jackie and Shadow’s time away from their nest, according to the organization.

    When Friends of Big Bear Valley announced the loss of the eggs on its Facebook page, which has more than 1 million followers, fans flooded the comments to share their sadness about the situation.

    “My heart hurts for Jackie and Shadow,” a Facebook user wrote in a comment. “Do Eagles have feelings? Are they sad? Are they grieving? Are the[y] angry at the ravens?”

    Voisard stressed that the ravens didn’t do anything wrong, nor did Jackie and Shadow. It’s just part of nature, she said.

    Another Facebook comment asked why Friends of Big Bear Valley didn’t move the livestream camera around to try and scare the raven off.

    While the organization understands the instinct to want to help the eagles, Voisard said humans are not allowed to intervene during nesting season.

    What about past seasons?

    A second clutch is possible if the eggs don’t make it through the early incubation process.

    In 2021, Jackie laid the first egg on Jan. 6. It was destroyed by a raven the next day, according to organization records. Jackie laid the second egg Jan. 9 that year, and the third on Jan. 13. Both were broken or eaten by ravens.

    But about a month later, Jackie had a second clutch of eggs.

    She laid the first egg on Feb. 8, 2021 and the second three days later. One chick didn’t survive the hatching process, while the other egg wasn’t viable after more than 50 days of incubation.

    In 2023, Jackie laid two eggs in mid-January that were both breached by ravens on March 7, according to organization records.

    Voisard said Friends of Big Bear Valley volunteers were curious as to whether the eagle couple would lay another clutch that year. They came to believe later that it was too late in the season.

    Looking ahead

    The eagles have withdrawn from incubation and have been spending more time away from the nest, according to the nonprofit.

    Voisard said the withdrawal was a “really good thing” that may open the door to more eggs.

    For Jackie’s hormones to reset, the bald eagle duo need to go back to bonding and working on their nest, which Friends of Big Bear Valley refers to as the birds' “nestorations.” It typically includes deliveries of sticks and fluff to furnish their long-time nest, which is toward the top of a Jeffrey pine tree overlooking Big Bear Lake.

    Two adult bald eagles sitting in a nest of twigs towards the top of a tree. A large blue lake and mountain region can be seen in the background.
    Big Bear's resident bald eagle couple, Jackie and Shadow, in their nest overlooking Big Bear Lake on Saturday.
    (
    Friends of Big Bear Valley
    /
    YouTube
    )

    The duo did some of that work Sunday, which the organization said is a hopeful sign bonding and nesting behaviors may be returning. Shadow, or the “Stickman,” as some fans call him, has brought at least three new sticks to the nest since the eggs were lost, according to organization records.

    Jackie and Shadow have also been heard mating in the area, according to Friends of Big Bear Valley.