Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • How 2028 will affect homelessness in LA
    Aerial view at sunset of Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum and the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art in Exposition Park. The Los Angeles Coliseum is large open-air stadium with a facade of arches and red bench seating. Behind the Coliseum is the Lucas Museum, a curved, futuristic building with two glass domes. In the background of the photo is a sprawling view of the city street grid.
    The Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum is one of many Olympic venues in the city of L.A.

    Topline:

    Two years out from the Olympic and Paralympic Games, Los Angeles officials say security requirements could displace hundreds of unhoused people living around competition venues during the summer of 2028. But there's no plan for how those people will be relocated, where they'll go, or who will pay for it.

    Why it matters: Los Angeles has one of the largest unsheltered populations in the nation, which as of the latest count rose to 49,002 unsheltered people countywide. That includes people living near prominent Olympics locations like the Venice Beach Boardwalk, Sepulveda Basin and Exposition Park.

    What's the plan? Exactly how many people will be forced out around these venues is not yet clear. The plans will come down to security perimeters — zones around event sites established by the U.S. Secret Service, where most people won't be allowed.

    Read on… for what officials have to say and the questions that remain.

    Two years out from the Olympic and Paralympic Games, Los Angeles officials say security requirements could displace hundreds of unhoused people living around competition venues during the summer of 2028. But there's no plan for how those people will be relocated, where they'll go, or who will pay for it.

    Los Angeles has one of the largest unsheltered populations in the nation, which as of the latest count rose to 49,002 unsheltered people countywide. That includes people living near prominent Olympics locations like the Venice Beach Boardwalk, Sepulveda Basin and Exposition Park.

    The Metro L.A. area, which includes venues Crypto Arena, Peacock Theater and the Convention Center, saw its unsheltered population increase by about 20% this year.

    Security requirements could kick people out

    Exactly how many people might be forced out around venues is not yet clear. The plans will come down to security perimeters — zones around event sites established by the U.S. Secret Service.

    Brandon Dean, the chief of special operations for the L.A. County Sheriff's Department, told LAist security perimeters will be divided into "red" zones directly around venues where people and vehicles will be screened before entering, and "yellow" zones marking a larger outer perimeter. Dean said he expected that unhoused people would be able to remain in yellow areas, but not red zones.

    A spokesperson for the Secret Service told LAist that the agency hasn’t yet determined the exact areas that will need heightened security. But early conversations indicate they could be expansive. Carter Hewgley, chief strategy officer for L.A. County’s Department of Homeless Services and Housing, said his office had been told to plan for perimeters as wide as a mile.

    " By our current needs assessment, there's about 1,600 unsheltered people that are in the areas around the projected venues that could be impacted," Hewgley said.

    Hewgley said plans are likely to change as the Olympics get closer. Still, the number lays out the scope of the challenge for Los Angeles, where homelessness is an endemic crisis despite billions of dollars spent combatting the problem. Since 2016, one year before L.A. secured the bid to host the 2028 Olympics, homelessness in the city is up 59%.

    No single authority for addressing homelessness

    To address homelessness around Olympic venues on a tight timeline, officials at the cash-strapped city and county say they need money and a road map. Both don't yet exist. The Secret Service is in charge of security, but there is no single authority coordinating or responsible for addressing homelessness during the Olympics.

    Gita O’Neill, interim CEO of the embattled Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, told the city council ad-hoc committee on the Olympics recently that organizers should establish an interagency task force to manage how homelessness would be handled ahead of and during the Games.

    City Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson has also introduced a motion at city council requesting a report on how L.A. plans to clear encampments around Olympic locations. That motion also asks for details on locating housing for people and how the city can recover costs.

    "If we've got a place where we know there's an encampment and we know there's going to be an activity there, how do we do encampment resolution? How do we make sure it's done in a humane way? And how do we make sure it's paid for?" Harris-Dawson told LAist.

    Meanwhile, critics say emerging plans for unhoused people during the Olympics are short-sighted, when Los Angeles needs to prioritize permanent rather than temporary housing.

     "We always see with big events this kind of enhanced enforcement," said John Raphling, an organizer with the Los Angeles Community Action Network, a group that advocates for people experiencing homelessness. "And it's never made up for with an enhanced effort to actually solve the problem… through keeping people in their permanent homes and developing more affordable housing and preserving the existing affordable housing."

    Funding is unclear

    In 1984, the last time L.A. hosted the Olympics, police officers on horseback scattered people living on the streets of Skid Row ahead of the Games. One police captain told the L.A. Times it was an effort to "sanitize" the city.

    L.A. officials this time around say they're committed to clearing encampments and people only if they can offer them at least temporary housing. But as of this month, there is no additional funding for such a project.

    That means local officials are seeking funds for the Olympics specifically.

    Carter Hewgley, with L.A. County, said officials have applied for nearly $93 million in state funding for "encampment resolution" around Olympic venues. He said that some of that money would follow the county's Pathway Home model, which clears encampments and brings individuals into interim housing. Hewgley said funds would also go towards direct financial assistance to help move people out of interim housing to create more space for an influx of new people that may be coming from around sports venues.

    " We are signaling to the state that this is a large event with large impacts and consequences and will require a large amount of resources," Hewgley said.

    City officials are also asking private Olympics organizing committee LA28 to help pick up the tab. According to an agreement with the city, Olympics organizers are expected to pay for Games-related city services that go beyond what's "normal and customary."

    But a recent human rights report produced by LA28 deferred to city officials on homelessness. That strategy document, submitted to the City Council, said that LA28 would coordinate with local officials and providers who will be supporting unhoused people impacted by the Olympics. It also pledged to notify authorities as early as possible if an unhoused person needs to be relocated due to the Games.

    City Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky, who chairs the budget and finance committee, questioned LA28's senior human rights advisor Julieta Valls Noyes about those plans at a recent council committee meeting.

     "Will LA28 ensure that the city or homelessness outreach organizations have the resources to engage unhoused residents who may be living inside a venue area or security perimeter?" Yaroslavsky asked. "Because, you know, we're not going to be able to do this on top of what we're already doing without help."

    Noyes responded saying that she believed the mass displacement of unhoused people that has occurred at past Olympics would not be as much of an issue for Los Angeles because organizers are relying on existing facilities rather than building new ones.

    Others aren't so sure. Randall Kuhn, a UCLA professor who runs a monthly survey of Los Angeles County's unhoused population, said he's worried about parts of downtown that are dense with tents and people being caught up in Olympics security plans.

    "What do they intend to do? What is the plan?" Kuhn said. "Is there an intention to provide any kind of genuine pipeline of care, a genuine pipeline to permanent housing? Or is this just gonna be sweeps that just push people just outside the perimeter?"

    Kuhn's working on including questions about how people are feeling about the Olympics in his monthly survey. But two years out, he says many people living on the streets in L.A. are just focused on survival.

  • Watch replay: Bass, Raman on environmental issues
    Two women in suit jackets hold mics and gesture as the address an audience.
    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass and Councilmember Nithya Raman separately explain their environmental positions at a mayoral forum held Thursday at L.A. Trade Tech in downtown Los Angeles.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass painted herself as a proven fighter for environmental justice issues. Her challenger, L.A. City Councilmember Nithya Raman, said progress on environmental goals has stalled in City Hall.

    Key topics: The candidates each had about 45 minutes to individually answer questions from Erin Stone, an LAist senior reporter focused on climate and environment.

    Here are some of the topics they covered:

    • Extreme heat
    • Emergency preparedness and recovery
    • Protecting communities from pollution
    • Water
    • Public transit

    LAist will have more coverage and analysis of the conversations Friday morning.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass described herself as a proven fighter for environmental justice issues. Her challenger, L.A. City Councilmember Nithya Raman, said progress on environmental goals has stalled in City Hall.

    Key topics: The candidates each had about 45 minutes to individually answer questions from Erin Stone, an LAist senior reporter focused on climate and environment.

    Here are some of the topics they covered:

    • Extreme heat
    • Emergency preparedness and recovery
    • Protecting communities from pollution
    • Water
    • Public transit

    About the organizers: The event is organized by a coalition of local environmental and environmental justice groups including: Los Angeles League of Conservation Voters, SCOPE-LA, Sierra Club, Clean and Healthy California, Neighborhood Council Sustainability Alliance and Communities for a Better Environment

    LAist will have more coverage and analysis of the conversations Friday morning.

  • Sponsored message
  • Ahead of election, Trump admin still has big plans

    Topline:

    The Trump administration is taking steps to advance a mysterious and unprecedented project to compile state-by-state lists of people it has decided are eligible citizens over the age of 18 who can vote in the upcoming midterm election.

    About the timing: Trump officials will no longer meet its own deadline to publish that information on a portal on Friday, which is 60 days before Election Day.

    Where things stand: Department of Justice attorneys told opposing counsel in two separate lawsuits that instead of meeting the Sept. 4 deadline, they would give 48-hours notice to plaintiffs' counsel before the state citizenship portal was launched, according to recent court filings.

    Why this matters: The U.S. has never attempted to create a comprehensive list of American citizens before this administration. Maintaining voter lists is the responsibility of states, not the federal government, as the Constitution dictates that states control elections. But President Trump has repeatedly taken steps to try to exert executive control over elections.

    The Trump administration is taking steps to advance a mysterious and unprecedented project to compile state-by-state lists of people it has decided are eligible citizens over the age of 18 who can vote in the upcoming midterm election. But it will no longer meet its own deadline to publish that information on a portal on Friday, which is 60 days before Election Day.

    Department of Justice attorneys told opposing counsel in two separate lawsuits that instead of meeting the Sept. 4 deadline, they would give 48-hours notice to plaintiffs' counsel before the state citizenship portal was launched, according to recent court filings.

    The U.S. has never attempted to create a comprehensive list of American citizens before this administration. Maintaining voter lists is the responsibility of states, not the federal government, as the Constitution dictates that states control elections. But President Trump has repeatedly taken steps to try to exert executive control over elections.

    The basis for the federal government creating state citizenship lists is an executive order Trump signed on March 31. A lower court had blocked implementation of key parts of that executive order in 23 states and Washington, D.C., but the Supreme Court stayed that injunction late last month, opening the door for the plan to be implemented after all.

    The March 31 executive order directs U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Social Security Administration to create "State Citizenship Lists" of individuals the agencies believe are citizens in each state, and send those lists to state officials "no fewer than 60 days before each regularly scheduled Federal election."

    The next section of the executive order says the U.S. attorney general will prioritize investigating and prosecuting state and local officials who issue federal ballots to anyone not eligible to vote.

    "States here have a strong incentive to actually use these lists to try to avoid federal investigation," said Jules Torti, counsel at the nonprofit Protect Democracy, in an interview with NPR. "But we know that these lists are going to be based on really inaccurate data. So the risk of disenfranchisement here is really, really palpable."

    The privacy group Electronic Privacy Information Center, along with individual voters, filed a motion Thursday asking a federal judge in Maryland to block the administration from creating the citizenship lists and publishing them on a portal. Specifically, they seek to block a June 8 implementation memo authored by USCIS director Joseph Edlow that outlines the plan.

    The motion, which was brought by Protect Democracy, along with another nonprofit legal group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, argues the administration's plans to share Americans' personal data between agencies and then disseminate the data to states violates multiple federal laws, including the Privacy Act, the Social Security Act and the Administrative Procedures Act. Under the Privacy Act, federal agencies must give the public 30 days notice and the opportunity to comment before they collect and disseminate Americans' personal data for a new purpose.

    The EPIC lawsuit also argues the government does not have access to accurate, up-to-date information on American citizens, especially those who move frequently, have changed their names, or are foreign-born. For example, Social Security's citizenship data often isn't updated when people naturalize, and the SAVE data system, operated by USCIS, frequently doesn't include records for people who became citizens as minors when their parents naturalized.

    Torti said it is "deeply concerning" that the administration is still planning to go ahead with the creation of citizenship lists but is no longer going to meet the deadline, since that means the lists will be completed even closer to Election Day.

    "It means additional chaos, additional confusion for the state election officials and just for voters," Torti said. "And I think that's the point. The point here is to create chaos in advance of the election."

    Neither the Department of Justice, nor the Department of Homeland Security, which is tasked with compiling the citizenship lists, responded to NPR's request for comment.

    The June 8 implementation memo stated that the portal for state election officials would be available around June 30 and a second portal where citizens could check their information would be available at a later date – but that deadline passed without further updates.

    The federal government has secured a domain for the state citizenship lists portal. While the portal is not currently online, it was briefly live in recent days with a landing page that said "Coming Soon," according to court filings.

    Lawyers representing Democratic party groups that had challenged the March 31 executive order in a separate lawsuit filed in April, accused the administration in a recent filing of failing to notify the court or the parties about its plans to move forward with the state citizenship portal. They asked the judge to require the federal government to give immediate updates about their plans to implement the executive order.

    This latest legal battle over the administration's plans to compile state citizenship lists comes as the Department of Homeland Security is ramping up its efforts to analyze state voter rolls with the goal of identifying potential noncitizens who are registered to vote. Previous audits have found instances of noncitizens casting ballots to be incredibly rare. 

    Additionally, last week, ICE published a request for information on a federal procurement site seeking vendors who can compile public voter rolls and voter history files from all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and U.S. territories, "to support Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) fraud detection and data segmentation activities."

    NPR's Hansi Lo Wang contributed reporting to this story. 
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • CA officials oppose land-swap deal
    A mountain with a sheer face is seen behind a row of trees. In the foreground is a river.
    El Capitan in Yosemite National Park.

    Topline:

    A group of California lawmakers called on federal officials to halt and reject a proposed land exchange in Yosemite National Park that would allow a private developer to take control of a strip of land in the park for an access road to the park’s main attractions.

    About the proposed land exchange: The proposal was first reported by news outlet NOTUS, which published a story last week alleging that members of the Trump administration were meeting with representatives of Kingsbarn Realty Capital, a private equity group that owns an 83-acre parcel next to the park. In an email to KQED, Kingsbarn’s lawyer Lanny J. Davis confirmed the group is pursuing the land exchange to build a new access road from its property to the park.

    Why it matters: A bipartisan group of 61 state legislators led by Assemblymember Greg Wallis, a Republican who represents Riverside and San Bernardino counties argues that the proposed land exchange is counter to the mission of the National Park Service and the founding of Yosemite in 1864, which set aside the start of the park for public use and protection for the first time in the history of the federal government.

    A group of California lawmakers called on federal officials to halt and reject a proposed land exchange in Yosemite National Park that would allow a private developer to take control of a strip of land in the park for an access road to the park’s main attractions.

    The letter to Department of the Interior Secretary Doug Burgum on Wednesday was signed by a bipartisan group of 61 state legislators led by Assemblymember Greg Wallis, a Republican who represents Riverside and San Bernardino counties.

    “Republicans and Democrats from both houses of the Legislature are standing together because some things are bigger than politics,” Wallis said in a statement. “Yosemite is not a subdivision. It is not a bargaining chip. And it is not for sale. Secretary Burgum and the administration should put an end to this proposal.”

    Two men and one woman stand side by side, looking to their left. Behind them is an bay.
    Interior Secretary Doug Burgum (center) visited the Tunnel Tops in San Francisco in 2025 after he and then-Attorney General Pam Bondi toured Alcatraz ahead of their announcement to reopen the former federal prison.
    (
    Katie DeBenedetti
    /
    KQED
    )

    The group argued that the proposed land exchange is counter to the mission of the National Park Service and the founding of Yosemite in 1864, which set aside the start of the park for public use and protection for the first time in the history of the federal government.

    “What is being proposed now runs directly against that founding principle, more than a century and a half later,” the letter states.

    It continues later: “Our national parks belong equally to every American. They are not the Department’s to trade away, and they are not for sale.”

    The proposal was first reported by news outlet NOTUS, which published a story last week alleging that members of the Trump administration were meeting with representatives of Kingsbarn Realty Capital, a private equity group that owns an 83-acre parcel next to the park. In an email to KQED, Kingsbarn’s lawyer Lanny J. Davis confirmed the group is pursuing the land exchange to build a new access road from its property to the park.

    Previous owners have pushed for the same deal since the early 2000s and failed in court.

    State Assemblymember Marc Berman (D-Menlo Park), who signed on to the letter, called the proposal “indefensible,” and said he’s looking at state laws to ensure a similar proposal could never slip through.

    “If the Trump administration can’t defend this publicly in broad daylight, then they shouldn’t be doing it,” he said.

    Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Marin) told KQED’s Forum on Wednesday that he’s worried there isn’t enough opposition among his Republican colleagues in Congress to stop the Trump administration’s efforts.

    “I have not seen a single Republican colleague willing to stand up to Donald Trump when he decides that he’s just going to do something,” Huffman said. “So that is my concern, that he just plows ahead with this — even if it has dubious legal authority, or even if it’s an open violation of the law. He’s doing stuff like that anyway. And in this Congress, there’s no one here to stop him.”

    In a statement to KQED, state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil (R-Modesto), whose district includes parts of Yosemite, said she will “keep pressing the Department [of the Interior] for a clear answer that this exchange will not proceed.”

    Since the news of the deal broke late last week, it has sparked condemnation from a number of Democratic state leaders, including Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff, as well as Attorney General Rob Bonta and Bonta’s predecessor, Xavier Becerra, who leads the race for California governor.

    “The secretive backroom land-exchange scheme has gotten everyone’s attention,” said Neal Desai, senior Pacific regional director of the National Parks Conservation Association. “I can’t recall another issue — and I’ve been working in the conservation space for over a couple of decades — where the response has been this sharp and so one-sided that this is a terrible idea that should not happen.”

    The backlash comes at a turbulent time for National Park Service employees, who have faced layoffs, staffing cuts and fear of retaliation for speaking up against Trump administration policies since the start of the second Trump administration.

    Some former employees have also raised concerns about a potential reorganization of the National Park Service, according to a separate letter sent to Burgum’s office Wednesday. According to an email seen by KQED, park superintendents have been asked to attend in-person regional meetings in September — with no clear agenda beyond discussing “agency priorities, our FY 2026 outlook, and other matters important to the work ahead.”

    The letter to Burgam, signed by 20 retired parks superintendents warns: “An ill-advised and hastily planned reorganization could dismantle that structure, putting our parks — and those who visit them — at great risk.”

    Emily Thompson, executive director of the Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks, which organized the letter, said the email about regional meetings “raises some alarm bells.”

    “The Park Service is already operating from a difficult place, from a place of crisis,” she said. “And any additional cuts, any movements or actions that would further jeopardize the capacity of the folks that are left, that’s concerning. It’s worrying, and it’ll have a devastating impact on the Park Service.”

    Among the letter’s signatories is Don Neubacher, retired Yosemite superintendent, who has been a vocal advocate for parks amid the Trump administration’s changes.

    Thompson said she’s worried parks leaders will be stretched even further than they already are, and local decision-making over parks could be in jeopardy.

    “Morale is low,” Thompson said. “It’s a hard time to be a federal employee. Anything that … contributes to this culture of fear, it’s just not acceptable.”

  • New program to help small shops install cameras
    A window to a business storefront is broken as you can see inside the gated fence and "Open" sign.
    A file photo of an East Village restaurant that was vandalized on Thursday, June 6, 2024.

    Topline:

    Long Beach is offering up to $1,500 for local business owners and landlords to equip their storefronts with safety measures like cameras, floodlights, alarms and point-of-sale systems.

    More details: Businesses with storefronts of 1,500 square feet or less may receive grants of up to $750, while businesses between 1,500 and 5,000 square feet are eligible for up to $1,500.

    How it works: The funds will be provided as a reimbursement after eligible security improvements are installed. Grants will be given out until funds are exhausted.

    Read on... for more on how to qualify for these grants in Long Beach.

    This story first appeared on Long Beach Post.

    Long Beach is offering up to $1,500 for local business owners and landlords to equip their storefronts with safety measures like cameras, floodlights, alarms and point-of-sale systems.

    The grant program is accepting online applications now. You can apply here.

    Businesses with storefronts of 1,500 square feet or less may receive grants of up to $750, while businesses between 1,500 and 5,000 square feet are eligible for up to $1,500.

    Nonprofit organizations are eligible as well, and landlords can apply on behalf of commercial storefronts that are vacant or occupied. Franchises can also receive the grant.

    To qualify, a business must:

    • Have an active business license for a storefront within the city
    • Be independently owned and operated (franchises are eligible)
    • Be currently open and active for business
    • Earn no more than $5 million in annual gross revenue
    • Hold “active” status with the California Secretary of State for corporations, limited liability companies and limited partnerships

    The funds will be provided as a reimbursement after eligible security improvements are installed. Grants will be given out until funds are exhausted.

    It’s a great idea, according to Edwin Jara, who manages a pet store in Belmont Heights and was on the receiving end of a break-in earlier this year.

    His store had security measures already in place — two cameras and an alarm system — but even that wasn’t enough to deter a masked burglar who grabbed $1,000 cash and a handful of dog treats.

    Despite having footage of the burglar, Jara said police haven’t been able to catch the person and that a detective never responded after he filed a police report.

    The grant program is being paid for with $350,000 from the city’s Redvelopment Agency along with $50,000 from Los Angeles County Supervisor Janice Hahn’s office.

    “Our local small businesses are part of the fabric of our neighborhoods, and when business owners feel unsafe, the whole community feels it,” Hahn said in a statement.

    In a statement, Mayor Rex Richardson said the program is a “direct investment in the hardworking business owners who make our commercial corridors vibrant and welcoming.”

    Jara said he would consider applying for a grant if the city could send someone to help him and the store’s owner fill out the application.

    He was offered a separate grant to replace a glass door the burglar smashed, but the store’s owner opted not to fill out the application.

    “There was a lot of stuff that we needed to do, and I don’t have a lot of that information,” Jara said.