Sustain LAist today!

Your monthly gift during our June member drive powers our local newsroom.
1,380 sustainers of 2,500 goal
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Homeless service data issues spark outrage
    A man in a suit speaks into a microphone with the words "BLUMENFIELD" written on a name placard in front of him.
    L.A. Councilmember Bob Blumenfield at a budget hearing he chaired on May 1, 2023.
    Topline: The city of L.A. is running into major data problems as the mayor’s office works to address homelessness – it was discovered this week that the city may be paying for services that were never used, such as motel rooms that sat empty.

    Key quotes: “It’s just insanity,” said Councilmember Monica Rodriguez. “There's a fundamental problem with getting some very basic information here, and it's costing taxpayers millions of dollars.” Added Councilmember Marqueece Harris-Dawson: “It feels like we’re flying blind with the people’s money.”

    What’s being done: LAHSA leaders say they’ve hired additional data staff and brought on a consulting company to help fix the issues. Despite the problems, major improvements in accuracy have been made in recent weeks, according to a city analysis last week.

    A threat to cut funding: Councilmember Bob Blumenfield said LAHSA needs to finally provide the city with direct access to its data – or he’ll work to cut them off from city dollars. “I’m at the end of my rope on this,” Blumenfield said, adding that he’s “sick of us paying money without getting any data.”

    The city of L.A. is running into major data problems as the mayor’s office works to address homelessness — it was discovered this week that the city may be paying for services that were never used, such as motel rooms that sat empty.

    Councilmembers learned new details about the issues, which include missing data points on people leaving motel shelters, during their housing and homelessness committee meeting this week.

    “It’s just insanity,” said Councilmember Monica Rodriguez. “There's a fundamental problem with getting some very basic information here, and it's costing taxpayers millions of dollars.”

    So far, the council has authorized $300 million for the Inside Safe motel shelter program since L.A. Mayor Karen Bass took office, an unprecedented spending level to try and move people off the streets and into housing at a time when the number of people experiencing homelessness continues to rise. The latest count shows nearly 33,000 people on L.A. streets are unhoused.

    Tempers flare at meeting

    The issue blew up Thursday at the meeting when a councilmember asked about missing data points about people who leave the Inside Safe motel shelter program.

    The nonprofits that serve unhoused people are supposed to log when unhoused people exit the motel room program. But that requirement has not been enforced by LAHSA, which contracts with the providers and manages the data system. The agency’s system allows providers to “bypass” disclosing whether a person has left the program, said Emily Vaughn Henry, LAHSA’s deputy chief information officer.

    That means the city might not know if it’s paying for empty motel rooms after people leave, councilmembers were told by the mayor’s top homelessness advisor in response to questions.

    What Is Inside Safe?

    Inside Safe is L.A. Mayor Karen Bass’ signature program to address homelessness and aims to give people living outdoors immediate quality housing in motels or hotels.

    “That's horrifying,” Councilmember Bob Blumenfield said at the meeting Thursday. He also chairs the council’s budget committee.

    “So we could be paying for weeks for an empty room, when somebody left two weeks earlier, and we could be using that room to house somebody?” Blumenfield asked.

    Mercedes Marquez, who leads the mayor’s homelessness efforts, acknowledged that could be the case.

    “If there was nothing else that was being done, you would be absolutely correct,” Marquez said in response to Blumenfield’s question.

    The mayor’s office is doing its own checking of motel invoices to try to ensure they’re accurate, she said. But LAHSA’s incomplete data about exits is a real problem that makes it possible that the city does not know if it’s paying for empty rooms in some instances, Marquez added.

    “I wouldn't tell you that it is never true that an extra day is paid for,” she said. “But it is not the usual because we're checking, and we check every invoice” before it’s paid.

    ‘Merry-go-round from hell’

    Councilmember Rodriguez said she also is extremely frustrated by LAHSA’s data problems.

    How do we know that we're not leasing out rooms that are not in fact being utilized?
    — Monica Rodriguez, L.A. councilmember

    “How do we know that we're not leasing out rooms that are not in fact being utilized?” she said.

    Rodriguez said these types of problems with LAHSA’s data have been going on for the six years she’s been on the council.

    “Get me off this merry-go-round from hell,” Rodriguez said, referring to a pattern of councilmembers pressing for more transparency but, in her view, not getting it. “The idea that we continue to have the same conversation with the same agency and the same problems being uplifted, and no one can seem to learn this lesson – I don't understand.”

    It feels like we’re flying blind with the people’s money.
    — Marqueece Harris-Dawson, L.A. councilmember

    “It feels like we’re flying blind with the people’s money,” added Councilmember Marqueece Harris-Dawson.

    Data problems at the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) long predate Bass’ term and the time that LAHSA’s CEO, who started in April, has been in charge.

    Despite the issues, city councilmembers and the city’s top fiscal advisor do acknowledge major improvements in recent weeks to the accuracy and transparency of the data, which city leaders and the public rely on to know how many people receive which types of housing services – and whether those programs are working.

    But huge problems remain, councilmembers say.

    A threat to yank funding

    Among those problems, according to councilmembers, is that city officials still don’t have direct access to LAHSA’s data. That’s despite the council providing LAHSA with millions more in funding over the last year in order to improve data access, they said.

    Blumenfield said this is putting him on the verge of halting any more city dollars going to the region’s homeless services agency.

    “I’m at the end of my rope on this,” Blumenfield said, adding that he’s “sick of us paying money without getting any data.”

    “I want to stop any dollars going to LAHSA until we have access to this…that’s literally where I’m going.”

    But while council members have threatened that repeatedly, Councilmember John Lee said it’s been an empty threat so far.

    The council has “failed” to actually explore other options for homeless services, he said.

    “If we were to make that choice, what would we do?” Lee said, adding that he shares his colleague’s frustrations about the data issues and supports looking into a replacement for LAHSA.

    “Otherwise, every year we're going to be coming here and having the same exact conversations,” he said.

    Promise Tracker

    Mayor Bass promised to house 17,000 Angelenos during her first year in office. How’s she doing so far? Our Promise Tracker is keeping tabs on Bass' progress tackling homelessness in L.A.

    Check on her progress.

    Vaughn Henry, the LAHSA official, responded that the holdup in giving data access is not from LAHSA but from L.A.’s Continuum of Care Board, which is a regional planning group that has 17 representatives of government, service providers, and people who have been unhoused. Vaughn said she supports giving the city direct access to the raw data.

    Multiple city officials have told LAist that the lack of accurate data from LAHSA has made it difficult to hold leaders accountable, going back many years, because there often is no reliable measure of whether programs are working as intended.

    How LAHSA is improving data quality

    Va Lecia Adams Kellum, who inherited the data problems when she started as LAHSA’s chief in April, acknowledged this week that LAHSA “has long been challenged to produce data that is accurate and timely.”

    At a news conference Tuesday marking her 100th day in office, she described a series of actions to try to fix it.

    Adams Kellum said LAHSA has hired additional data staff and brought on an information technology consulting company, Gartner, which she described as an industry leader.

    Our team is working diligently every day to produce reports, on a weekly and bi-weekly basis.

    — Va Lecia Adams Kellum, CEO of LAHSA

    “Our team is working diligently every day to produce reports, on a weekly and bi-weekly basis,” she said.

    “And that means working directly with the service providers, making sure we're curing data, making sure we're looking at the data, making sure that it's accurate and accessible.”

    HOMELESSNESS FAQ

    How did we get here? Who’s in charge of what? And where can people get help?

    Among the changes LAHSA has made in the last couple of weeks is spelling out in their reports exactly how much of the data they believe is unreliable.

    “We're being transparent, and we know that we can get better. And we know that our whole entire system has to function more effectively and be more data-driven,” Adams Kellum said in response to LAist’s questions Tuesday about the data problems.

    ‘Same song every two weeks’

    At Thursday’s meeting, Harris-Dawson noted he and his colleagues keep expressing frustrations with LAHSA’s data at the twice-per-month committee meetings.

    “It is beginning to sound unfortunately like a choir that sings the same song every two weeks,” he said, also expressing frustration about the issue.

    But, he said, residents are demanding urgent action on homelessness.

    His constituents who live in homes and own businesses aren’t so concerned about how much motel rooms are costing, he said. They want more encampments cleared.

    “For them, they're not asking me about how much we're paying per night per room, or if the room is filled or not,” Harris-Dawson said.

    “They're saying, ‘It's great that this encampment is gone. Can we get rid of the next one?’”

  • With days left, US opening match not sold out

    Topline:

    Something unusual is happening with only a few days remaining before the U.S. men's national team opens its World Cup campaign against Paraguay: Tickets for the match are not sold out.

    More details: Although numbers fluctuate regularly, FIFA's ticketing website still shows 132 tickets left to sell for a game that's set to take place in Los Angeles on Friday. Meanwhile, resale platforms such as StubHub and SeatGeek — and FIFA's own marketplace — also show thousands of tickets on sale.

    Why now: Ticketing experts widely agree on the reason: the prices. FIFA dramatically jacked them up for the tournament — especially for high profile games. The most expensive regular seats for the U.S. opener against Paraguay are priced at $2,735 — more than the final cost for the 2022 World Cup final — while the cheapest are $1,120.

    Read on... for more on the opening matches.

    Something unusual is happening with only a few days remaining before the U.S. men's national team opens its World Cup campaign against Paraguay: Tickets for the match are not sold out.

    Although numbers fluctuate regularly, FIFA's ticketing website still shows 132 tickets left to sell for a game that's set to take place in Los Angeles on Friday. Meanwhile, resale platforms such as StubHub and SeatGeek — and FIFA's own marketplace — also show thousands of tickets on sale.

    The number is even higher for Canada's opening match against Bosnia Herzegovina in Toronto on the same day, with 226 tickets left in FIFA's website and a high number of tickets available in resale markets.

    That's unusual for high-profile events such as the opening matches of the World Cup — traditionally among the hardest to get tickets in the tournament. This year will feature three hosts in the U.S., Canada and Mexico — but so far only Mexico's opening match against South Africa on Thursday looks to be virtually sold out.

    Ticketing experts widely agree on the reason: the prices. FIFA dramatically jacked them up for the tournament — especially for high profile games. The most expensive regular seats for the U.S. opener against Paraguay are priced at $2,735 — more than the final cost for the 2022 World Cup finalwhile the cheapest are $1,120.


    Even President Trump said he wouldn't pay those prices.

    "I would certainly like to be there, but I wouldn't pay it either, to be honest with you," Trump told the New York Post in a recent interview.

    The other two remaining games for the U.S. national have far fewer tickets available, given that prices are well below the ones for the opening match.

    Prices have also fallen sharply

    There are not only plenty of tickets left to sell — a number of them are also available below FIFA's face value. According to Ticketdata, which tracks prices across the resale platforms, the cheapest pair of tickets for the opening match for the U.S. and Canada was $951 as of Monday morning, while in FIFA's resale platform, tickets were available for as low as $690.

    Other games across the 104-match tournament also still have many tickets left to sell — despite FIFA President Gianni Infantino's claim that every match is "already sold out." That's especially the case for lesser well known teams such as the Jordan against Algeria match, which still had hundreds of unsold seats in the FIFA's web site.

    Demand for high-profile tickets such as Argentina and Portugal was far higher, however, with many of those games looking largely sold out.

    Will the opening matches sell out?

    Whether eventually the U.S. and Canada opening matches will sell out is hard to answer. Throughout the sales process, FIFA has closely guarded how many tickets it has actually sold and how many are left to sell, making it virtually impossible to gauge.

    In addition, like other teams, FIFA could also sell tickets in other platforms including third-party ones such as SeatGeek, which can further obscure how many tickets are left to sell.

    FIFA and organizers, however, are hoping for a surge in excitement that leads to a last-minute rush of sales for the opening matches as well as for those such as Jordan against Algeria that look far from being sold out.

    Ben Shields, a senior lecturer at the MIT Sloan School of Management, says perceptions so far of the tournament have been shaped by how expensive tickets and travel has been for a tournament taking place across an entire continent.

    That, he says, "does not seem to sit well with many."

    But that could change.

    "The hope or bet — for FIFA is that once the matches start — and the greatest players in the world compete for the most prestigious prize of them all, the sport as business lens will fade into the background and the World Cup will be seen and experienced as the enduring global institution that it is," Shields says. "We shall see."
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • OC supervisors expected to discuss Tuesday

    Topline:

    Orange County’s top elected leaders on Tuesday are set to discuss what to do with $3.7 million recovered from the Andrew Do corruption scheme.

    The backstory: Do is now serving a five-year sentence in federal prison after he admitted to accepting bribes in exchange for awarding millions in tax dollars meant to feed needy seniors and people with disabilities in his district. As part of the plea deal, Do acknowledged taking over $800,000 in bribes through his two daughters, including a down payment on the house his youngest daughter Rhiannon Do later forfeited to resolve the criminal case. The scheme was first uncovered by LAist.

    What they want: Ahead of Tuesday’s discussion, Do’s successor — Janet Nguyen — said the funds should support residents of his former district who were deprived by Do and his alleged co-conspirators. Other supervisors have advocated a broader view of how they’d want to use the money.

    Orange County’s top elected leaders on Tuesday are set to discuss what to do with $3.7 million recovered from the Andrew Do corruption scheme.

    Do is now serving a five-year sentence in federal prison after he admitted to accepting bribes in exchange for awarding millions in tax dollars meant to feed needy seniors and people with disabilities in his district.

    As part of the plea deal, Do acknowledged taking more than $800,000 in bribes through his two daughters, including a down payment on the house his youngest daughter Rhiannon Do later forfeited to resolve the criminal case. The scheme was first uncovered by LAist.

    Federal officials recovered money from seized bank accounts and two properties connected to Do’s scheme — including the Tustin house his daughter bought.

    The county Board of Supervisors is expected to publicly discuss plans for the recovered funds as they make decisions on the overall county budget at their meeting Tuesday. Public comment will also be taken.

    What to do with the money?

    Ahead of Tuesday’s discussion, Do’s successor said the funds should support residents of his former district who were deprived by Do and his alleged co-conspirators.

    “For the past five years, every other district in Orange County has benefitted from the same community funds to support their cities, nonprofits, civic projects which strengthens their communities,” Supervisor Janet Nguyen wrote in a mass email to constituents last week. “However, our district went without because Do stole what belonged to our residents.”

    “This money was stolen from the First District, and it must come back to the First District,” Nguyen added.

    Nguyen was Do’s mentor and former boss more than a decade ago, before the two had a bitter falling out by 2016.

    She encouraged residents of her district to send letters to the board and to speak during public comments.

    Several county supervisors told LAist they supported a similar approach, one in which the recovered money goes to support the original intended recipients: seniors and people with disabilities in Do’s former district. Some supervisors have since advocated a broader view of how they’d want to use the money, noting that it was meant to address disruptions caused by the pandemic. Now that years have passed since the initial COVID-19 outbreak and lockdowns, some supervisors argue community needs have changed.

    “We are so many years on, and the problems that money originally was to address (mostly Covid impacts) are now behind us, that I think we should have a discussion about how and where to spend it,” Supervisor Don Wagner told LAist via text message in March. “The budget is so tight and the needs so great across the county.”

    Supervisor Vicente Sarmiento said he’d work toward a fair distribution of the funds to best serve residents, with a focus on current needs.

    “We will definitely consider what areas of the County were harmed by Do’s scheme, but we must also remember that the funds were intended for relief efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic, a threat we are no longer facing,” he said in March. “We also need to consider addressing the current needs of residents with any dollars returned to the county.”

    Millions more haven’t been recovered, at least yet

    The amount of taxpayer money recovered so far is less than half of the $7.9 million Andrew Do admitted was diverted from specific meal contracts.

    In a lawsuit seeking to recover funds, the county alleges the total amount lost in the scheme was even larger: $13.25 million. The county’s suit — scheduled for trial in November 2027 — covers all of the money Do gave to two nonprofits accused in the scheme, Viet America Society and Hand to Hand Relief Organization.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is ngerda.47.

    That leaves more than $4 million — and possibly much more — not yet recovered.

    A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office noted they have an ongoing criminal case against Do’s alleged co-conspirator Peter Pham.

    “Assuming we obtain a conviction in that matter, we would expect to seek restitution,” the spokesperson, Ciaran McEvoy, said.

    Pham left the country on a flight to Taiwan in late 2024 and remains a fugitive, according to McEvoy. The case against him also includes charges against another alleged co-conspirator, Thanh Huong Nguyen, who led the Hand to Hand nonprofit.

  • Fans watch US men’s national team's practice
    A mother and daughter with medium skinned stand smiling. The daughter is wearing a stars and stripe head scarf. Behind them is a soccer field with players standing and sitting.
    The U.S. Men's National Team at their only open-to-the-public practice session in Irvine.

    Topline:

    More than 6,000 fans watched a U.S. Men's National Soccer Team practice Monday morning at their base camp at Great Park Sports Complex in Irvine. It's the only time the team will practice in public during the World Cup.

    Why it matters: For fans of the US Men's National Soccer Team, it's a rare chance to see them without an expensive ticket. Thousands signed up for a lottery, with many left disappointed.

    What's at stake: The U.S. men’s team is representing co-host country USA in this 2026 World Cup, a country that has millions of youth in soccer leagues nationwide but that is often bested in international play by much smaller countries.

    Why Irvine: The team will use the soccer field and stadium at the Great Park as their training facility during the team’s three group play matches at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood.

    The backstory: The U.S. men’s team has not made it to quarterfinals in the World Cup since 2002.

    What's next: The U.S. plays Paraguay on June 12, Australia on June 19, and Turkey on June 25 in group play at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood.

    Fans of the U.S. Men’s National Soccer Team swelled the stadium at the Great Park in Irvine on Monday to watch players practice for the first time since arriving at the training facility they’ll call home for the first round of the 2026 World Cup.

    “Seeing them play right now… it was really cool to see how they play and how they practice,” said Mila Ran, who came with her mother from nearby Mission Viejo.

    “This whole time she’s saying, 'I want to go shoot, I want to go play,'” said Mila’s mother, Farah Ran.

    They were among about 6,000 people who won free entry to the practice in a lottery that received more than 30,000 entries, according to Irvine officials.

    A light skinned teenage boy and a light skinned woman, both wearing Team USA T shirts, stand in line next to a green field.
    Fans got to the venue early.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
    /
    LAist
    )

    The team’s biggest stars — Christian Pulisic, Antonee Robinson and others — showed off their ball handling skills, honed over years of play on U.S. youth fields and overseas in professional leagues. Fans yelled, waved U.S. flags, held up homemade signs, and did the wave several times.

    Soccer players wearing a black uniform play soccer on a green pitch.
    The U.S. Men's National Team at their only open-to-the-public practice session in Irvine.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
    /
    LAist
    )

    After the roughly 45-minute practice, some players walked to the sidelines to take selfies with fans and sign autographs.

    The players know it’s going to take more than this, however, to live up to expectations during the World Cup.

    A light skinned man with blonde hair tied into a bun, wearing a soccer strip, kneels down to sign an autograph for a young boy with medium skin and dark hair. He's surrounded by other young boys wearing USA soccer shirts.
    US men's national team player Tim Ream signs an autograph for a fan.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
    /
    LAist
    )

    “To be in a position to train in front of these people today… is such a unique opportunity and one that none of us take for granted,” said backup goalie Matt Freese before the practice. “We’re working as hard as we can, as focused as we can to leave the next generation inspired."

    The U.S. men’s team and their training staff will use the Great Park facility over the next several weeks as the team plays Paraguay on Friday, Australia on June 19, and Turkey on June 25 in group play at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood.

  • Accused of starting deadly Palisades Fire
    A distraught woman holds a bag while gesturing to a car as fire and smoke billow in the background.
    A woman cries as the Palisades Fire advances in Pacific Palisades on Jan. 7, 2025.

    Topline:

    Jury selection began Monday for the trial of the man accused of igniting a fire that led to the deadly and destructive Palisades Fire, which killed 12 people and destroyed thousands of structures.

    The charges: Jonathan Rinderknecht is charged with one count of destruction of property by means of fire, one count of arson affecting property used in interstate commerce and one count of setting timber afire. He could face up to 45 years in federal prison.

    How we got here: Prosecutors allege Rinderknecht set brush alight near a popular hiking trail in the Santa Monica Mountains on New Year’s Day, starting the Lachman Fire. Firefighters initially thought they put out the fire, but it remained smoldering underground for several days. High winds then brought the embers to the surface, sparking the Palisades Fire, which burned more than 23,000 acres.

    Jury selection began Monday for the trial of the man accused of igniting a fire that led to the deadly and destructive Palisades Fire, which killed 12 people and destroyed thousands of structures.

    Jonathan Rinderknecht is charged with one count of destruction of property by means of fire, one count of arson affecting property used in interstate commerce and one count of setting timber afire. He could face up to 45 years in federal prison.

    How we got here

    Prosecutors allege Rinderknecht set brush alight near a popular hiking trail in the Santa Monica Mountains on New Year’s Day, starting the Lachman Fire. Firefighters initially thought they put out the fire, but it remained smouldering underground for several days. High winds then brought the embers to the surface, sparking the Palisades Fire, which burned more than 23,000 acres.

    What prosecutors say

    In a court filing in April, prosecutors allege Rinderknecht displayed “extreme anger, indignation, and frustration” because he had to spend New Year's Eve alone. After driving around for Uber, Rinderknecht hiked up a popular trail and set chaparral alight in a clearing, according to prosecutors.

    “He then started calling 911 multiple times, hiked down the hill, and fled the area in his car before firefighters arrived. Defendant returned to the area after he saw fire trucks arriving and then took videos of the firefighting efforts,” prosecutors wrote.

    The filing also states that Rinderknecht threatened to burn down his sister’s home.

    Prosecutors are expected to argue that Rinderknecht started the smaller blaze knowing it could turn into a bigger inferno.

    U.S. District Court Judge Anne Hwang has previously expressed the government’s position could confuse jurors.

    What the defense says

    Defense attorney Steve Haney previously told reporters that prosecutors were trying to blame Rinderknecht for a fire that started days before the Palisades Fire.

    "Well what about what happened between Jan. 1 and Jan. 7?" he asked. "Jonathan wasn't out there with a fire hose putting that fire out at the Lachman location, the Fire Department was. So why are they blaming him for whatever the Fire Department didn't do?"