The Brief

The Los Angeles area’s largest homeless services system is using a new, real-time digital database to track shelter bed availability in an effort to reduce wait times for thousands of unhoused residents.

Starting July 1, the tool will be used to automatically match unsheltered people with beds, according to the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. Previously, the agency known as LAHSA, used a patchwork of spreadsheets to monitor when beds became available, a process that was often slow and inefficient.

“ There were a lot of challenges tracking inventory in the past,” said Bevin Kuhn, the agency’s deputy chief analytics officer, at a LAHSA Commission meeting last month. "We're gonna let the computer do a lot of that thinking.”

L.A. County is home to more than 75,000 unhoused residents, according to LAHSA’s latest count, and a lack of available shelter beds is a chronic problem.

The agency funds about 16,000 “interim housing” beds across L.A. city and county — a category that includes motel rooms, congregate shelters and tiny homes. There are consistently about 5,000 people on wait lists for those shelter beds, according to the agency.

On the other hand, thousands of shelter beds can sit empty on any given night because providers often don’t know which beds are available and where, according to LAHSA.

A 2024 L.A. City Controller’s audit examining the city’s shelter system found that 1 in 4 LAHSA shelter beds sat empty, and the agency had “severe data quality issues.” The report also called on LAHSA to formalize its reservation system for shelter beds.

LAHSA did not respond to multiple requests for comment about its new shelter inventory system.

Homelessness officials and service providers say they want efficiency, but they also have concerns about automating the shelter system and losing human interaction, which they say many unhoused clients need.

"Call me archaic, but I will always think you need a lot of people involved when you're dealing with vulnerable people,” LAHSA Commissioner Amy Perkins said at the April meeting. “So computers will never be able to do this.”

How it works

LAHSA first tested its new bed inventory tracking system in January 2024 with the city’s Inside Safe and county’s Pathway Home programs, both of which focus on moving people out of encampments and into hotels.

The new database is built into an existing database called the Homeless Management Information System that service providers were already using to track clients.

The new system captures detailed information about each shelter, including bathroom and kitchen facilities, accessibility features for people with disabilities and other requirements, such as they only accept a particular gender or age group.

The database allows shelter managers and outreach teams to see why some beds might be offline. It also shows users who is currently staying in each room or bed in the system.

Service providers are responsible for updating the system every morning. LAHSA officials say this fixes a problem in which the systems showed that beds were occupied long after clients had left because providers were waiting to complete paperwork before updating the system.

Homeless services providers underwent training from LAHSA and started working with the new system earlier this year.

Ben Kay, who works for homeless services provider HOPICS, told LAHSA commissioners last month that the agency needed more input from people on the front lines — like those who work with outreach and intake — before overhauling its shelter management system.

“ The growing pains are not going to be felt at [the commission] level,” Kay said. “They're not gonna be felt by those who have made this decision. They're gonna be felt by the people who are doing the work and those on the street.”

Laura Harwood, deputy chief program officer at Hope the Mission, said her organization has been using the software for the past few weeks. She’s optimistic about it, but cautioned that it’s hard for shelter operators to take on new technology.

“With rising costs, declining donations, service cuts and leadership changes at LAHSA, the capacity to absorb and execute new initiatives like this one is being tested,” she said.

Since March, some of the information on shelters has been available to the general public through an online dashboard, but it’s not updated daily. The dashboard allows users to monitor interim housing occupancy rates, track the availability of beds across different regions and learn why certain beds might be offline.

The dashboard has information about more than 11,000 LAHSA-funded shelter beds. As of Monday, about 80% of were occupied, according to the dashboard. However, officials said that figure may be inaccurate because not all providers have finished entering data. About 3% of the total units are offline.

The interior of a 120-square-foot (11-square-meter) with bathroom rapid-response shelter home to house the homeless on display in Los Angeles earlier this year. The state and local governments have been under pressure to deliver more beds for unhoused Californians.

(

Frederic J. Brown

/

AFP via Getty Images

)

Matching clients with shelter

LAHSA plans to launch the next phase of the system in July by automating the matching process. Currently, service providers are manually matching clients with available beds using a disjointed spreadsheet system and making phone calls.

The new system will start off somewhat slowly, with more than half of the 11,000 beds in the inventory being automatically matched. When matches are made, case managers will receive email notifications and can schedule intake appointments.

Clients will have 24 hours to accept a match and 48 hours to arrive at the facility before the bed is released.

Matches will be made based on criteria developed by LAHSA and L.A. County. Priority is given to clients who need to be moved from other shelters, including victims of crime, people with accessibility needs and those in programs that are shutting down. People who are highly vulnerable or have been waiting longest will also be prioritized.

Perkins cautioned LAHSA about relying too much on technology because new systems don’t always work as intended.

“Of course it sounds great on paper, but I don't know, I'm just nervous,” Perkins said. “The more you centralize and take people out of things, it sounds great, but then it doesn't always translate.”

Harwood from Hope the Mission urged LAHSA to keep its teams of staffers dedicated to matching clients with housing.

“The human element that matchers provide is essential,” she said. “Replacing that entirely with automation could feel as frustrating as being trapped in a phone system loop.”

LAHSA officials acknowledged those concerns and emphasized that human expertise remains central to the process. Kelsey Madigan, LAHSA’s director on interim housing, said it’s a running joke among the matching team that they could be replaced by robots.

“I'm like, 'No, we need you,'" she said. "It takes an entire team to support matching.”

A judge on Wednesday suspended criminal charges against a former U.S. Marine arrested at President Donald Trump’s Los Angeles-area golf course with ammunition and a gun in his vehicle. He is undergoing a psychiatric evaluation.

Los Angeles County Judge John Lonergan Jr. sent Jeanine John Taele, 38, to a mental health court in Hollywood based on statements he made in a pretrial evaluation indicating he wasn’t mentally fit to stand trial. In the evaluation, Taele falsely insisted he had been a State Department official for 14 years.

When Taele was arrested earlier this month, he was seen wearing an earpiece and taking pictures of the golf course where Trump was scheduled to attend a Republican National Committee dinner. The event was at Trump National Golf Course Los Angeles in Rancho Palos Verdes, just south of L.A.

A search of his pickup truck in the golf course parking lot at the time turned up a loaded 9 mm pistol, binoculars and a badge that read “security protection agent,” according to the U.S. attorney’s office in Los Angeles.

Lonergan expressed particular concern over the 200 pages of Taele’s writings that investigators found following his arrest. The writings included schedules for first lady Melania Trump and members of the president’s Secret Service, as well as detailed lists for surviving “off the grid.” The judge did not say whether the writings included any specific political motives or ideologies.

“This case itself is alarming in this day and age with the violence that is creeping into our everyday lives, especially with our partisanship in the political environment” ahead of the midterms, Lonergan said.

The judge also cited a previous arrest in November 2025 at an AT&T store where Taele accused an employee of spying on him with Meta Glasses, stole the glasses, and was found muttering to himself in the parking lot. He was charged with second-degree robbery following that incident.

Taele was charged with several felonies including possession of a short-barreled rifle or shotgun and receiving a large-capacity magazine. He was also charged with carrying a concealed firearm in a vehicle, a misdemeanor.

Taele appeared in the Torrance, California, courtroom Wednesday, weeks after his Aug. 5 arrest, wearing a vest designed to prevent self-harm or suicide attempts. Nearly a dozen family members and friends tearfully watched from the courtroom.

Lonergan declined to set bail for Taele, who will remain in jail until a Sept. 9 hearing at the Hollywood Mental Health Court.

Taele’s attorney, public defender A.J. Bayne, said it was too early to tell whether Taele’s mental health would play a role in his legal defense.

“He’s a veteran, he served our country, and I don’t know enough right now, but he has a family that loves him, that has huge support for him,” Bayne said, adding that “people assume too much” about Taele’s motives on the day he was arrested at the golf course.

Taele is a decorated U.S. Marine who served two tours in Iraq and Afghanistan between 2008 and 2016, according to a Marine Corps spokesperson. He was a corporal who received countless accolades, including two Marine Corps Good Conduct Medals, a Navy Unit Commendation, a National Defense Service Medal, and a Global War on Terrorism Service Medal.

A politically heated bribery case in Orange County came to an end Wednesday when a judge cleared Westminster Councilmember Amy Phan West of wrongdoing.

West was charged with a misdemeanor last year for allegedly using her clout as an elected official to coax parking officers not to tow her husband’s car. In lieu of a trial, the judge ordered her to take an ethics training course and do 20 hours of community service. In exchange, the charge would be dropped and her record cleared.

But earlier this month, just before Phan West was scheduled to complete her year under court supervision, the Orange County District Attorney’s Office asked the judge to revoke the deal. Deputy District Attorney Matt Bradbury alleged that Phan West hadn’t taken the criminal charge to heart and continued to violate ethics rules, including by allegedly using public resources for personal gain.

In court Wednesday, Bradbury tried to prove that Phan West improperly used her City Council office to do a campaign media interview, and that she and her supporters had handed out campaign literature at the city’s annual Tet parade. Phan West, a Republican, ran for Congress in the June primary, but did not advance to the upcoming general election.

Bradbury also showed a video from a candidate forum in which Phan West called the proceedings against her a “jungle court” and compared her legal problems to those of the president.

“Like how they’re doing it to Donald J. Trump — it’s the same thing they’re doing to take me out,” Phan West said in the video.

Judge Sherri Honer rejected the prosecution’s argument and said the evidence did not prove Phan West had broken any laws.

“People express dissatisfaction with the court all the time,” she said of Phan West’s comments during the candidate forum. “That’s not an ethical violation.”

After the judge’s ruling, Phan West’s husband, who was in the courtroom with the couple’s three sons, wiped away tears. Phan West’s youngest son shouted, “Thank you, judge.”

Outside the courthouse, Phan West said her faith in God had gotten her through the ordeal. She also said she thinks residents plotting her demise were behind the criminal charge, aiming to drain her “financially, emotionally, and spiritually.”

“ I don't know why they don't like me, but I believe I'm fighting for everyone who wants to have a voice to speak out even though people don't agree with them,” Phan West said.

The exterior of Westminster City Hall.

(

Jill Replogle

/

LAist

)

Westminster City Council ‘dysfunctional’

Westminster’s five-member City Council has been roiled by infighting in recent years, and civically active residents have lined up on either side of a stark dividing line between a three-member council majority on one side, and Phan West and council ally NamQuan Nguyen on the other. That has led to shouting matches, name-calling, and long meetings.

In June 2024, the council held a discussion on whether to censure Phan West for behaviors, allegedly including improperly disclosing confidential information and lying. The meeting lasted more than 11 hours.

The council eventually censured Phan West, and later the city filed a lawsuit against her and Nguyen for repeatedly disrupting meetings and creating a rowdy atmosphere. A judge issued a default judgment against Nguyen last year, ordering him not to speak at council meetings without the mayor’s permission.

The case against Phan West is scheduled for trial in November, shortly after the election.

Ryan Bent, a trustee for the North Orange County Community College District and friend of Phan West, has attended many of the contentious meetings, even though he doesn’t live in Westminster. He said the City Council has stood out in recent years “as one the most dysfunctional” in the county. Phan West, he concedes, is part of the problem.

“In her case, she’s gone too far, too often,” he said. Still, Bent said, he has come to believe that Phan West has been unfairly targeted because of her outspokenness and staunch conservative politics.

“They’ve gone after her mercilessly,” he said.

He also called the city’s lawsuit against Phan West a waste of money at a time when the public budget is tight.

“I’ve never seen City Council members sue one of their own using city tax dollars,” he said. “It’s just not a good practice at all.”

The opposition, and the upcoming election

Terry Rains, a Westminster resident and one of Phan West’s most vocal foes, said she was disappointed with the judge’s ruling in the bribery case. “ This is the very essence of abuse of power by an elected official for personal gain,” Rains said of the towing incident.

“If I went out and said, ‘Don't tow my car away,’ and I'm just a resident, they'd just laugh,” she said.

Rains is closely following the city’s civil case against Phan West. She agreed the lawsuit is a waste of taxpayer money, but blamed Phan West. She said the city had to sue her “just to get her to adhere to the rules of meetings and her behavior during council meetings.”

Phan West declined to discuss the city’s lawsuit after Wednesday’s court hearing since it is ongoing. In the past, she has accused her City Council opponents of violating her right to free speech and waging a personal vendetta against her.

The upcoming election in November may turn out to be the best gauge of how Westminster residents feel about the ongoing drama. Two council seats are up for election — Phan West’s District 1 seat and Nguyen’s District 4 seat. Both face several challengers. The mayor’s position, which all residents vote on, is also up for election. Five candidates are vying for that seat.

Gov. Gavin Newsom is pushing for an eleventh-hour legislative proposal that would give an environmental carve-out to a Santa Monica developer who is a Newsom appointee to state commissions and longtime donor.

The draft proposal, obtained by CalMatters, would effectively exempt a mixed-use project on Santa Monica’s oceanfront, designed by the late architect Frank Gehry, from the state’s environmental regulations of coastal developments, unless the city adopts its own land use policies by Jan. 1, 2028.

The project belongs to Jeff Worthe, who, along with his wife Kristin Worthe, has donated more than $274,000 to Newsom’s campaigns and inaugural fund between 2018 and 2022, according to state campaign finance records. Newsom appointed Worthe to the California Privacy Protection Agency Board in 2023, and then to the California High-Speed Rail Authority last year.

The Santa Monica City Council and the California Coastal Commission both approved the $350 million project a few years ago after Worthe agreed to pay millions of dollars toward low-cost housing and city infrastructure. But the approvals lapsed, and the project never broke ground despite Worthe’s promise to start building in early 2025.

The new last-minute proposal shocked and angered a coalition of environmental advocates, who for months have urged state leaders to reject any backdoor deal to exempt any project from the California Coastal Act, a 50-year-old law that set the environmental standard for coastal development.

In May, the coalition successfully fought off a legislative proposal that would have expedited Worthe’s project. In June, they fended off another proposal from Newsom’s office that would have exempted most housing developments along Santa Monica’s shoreline from the act. About 90,000 people live in the city, which is known for its famous pier and a long stretch of beachside restaurants and hotels.

The specific carveouts in the latest proposal would set a precedent of overriding coastal environment protections for the interest of wealthy developers, said Susan Jordan, executive director of the California Coastal Protection Network.

“Every other developer is going to want the same treatment,” Jordan said. “It sends the message: If you have deep pockets, you get a big payoff.”

Assemblymember Rick Zbur, a Democrat representing Santa Monica, said he received the proposal Monday night. He said he opposes it because it would undermine Assembly Bill 1740, which he authored this year to set a deadline for Santa Monica to develop its land use plan — known as a “local coastal program” — by Jan. 1, 2029. The bill passed 76-0 in the Assembly Tuesday and is headed to the governor’s desk.

The city is one of 14 in California without such a plan, which means developers must obtain individual permits directly from the California Coastal Commission, which often takes longer.

Both area lawmakers oppose it

Newsom’s proposal would fast-track Worthe’s project if the city fails to develop a plan by 2028 — a soft deadline the city had set for itself in a June agreement with the coastal commission.

“This isn’t about the project,” Zbur told CalMatters. “It’s about the precedent of exempting a project and about doing something that is in conflict [with] and undermines a bill that I just worked so hard to bring all the parties together on.”

Sen. Ben Allen, an El Segundo Democrat who also represents the area, similarly opposed the proposal, arguing it would incentivize developers to delay the city from creating a local coastal plan. Allen said he supports Zbur’s legislation instead.

“I … am not interested in unwinding that work,” he said in a statement Wednesday.

Newsom has been critical of the coastal commission and appointed several pro-housing commissioners in recent years to speed up coastal development.

His proposal comes as President Donald Trump has sought to weaken California’s environmental regulations and push for offshore oil drilling. The Trump administration has launched an investigation into the Coastal Commission’s authority, which environmental activists, the commission and Newsom himself see as a power grab intended to undermine the state’s environmental protections.

But environmental advocates called Newsom hypocritical for criticizing Trump while pushing a regulatory carveout for the Santa Monica project.

'He’s carving up the Coastal Act. He’s selling it to the highest bidder.'

Marce Gutiérrez-Graudiņš, founder of the climate justice advocacy group Azul, said it would be dangerous to “weaken our law instead of strengthening it” now.

Susan Jordan, executive director of the California Coastal Protection Network, said Newsom is following Trump’s playbook.

“He’s carving up the Coastal Act. He’s selling it to the highest bidder. And we don’t need a governor to be doing that, and we certainly don’t need our next president to do that,” she said.

When asked about his link to Worthe and why he’s pushing for the proposal late in the session, Newsom declined to comment. But he said he spoke with one state lawmaker who represents the area two days ago — without identifying who — and received “healthy feedback.”

“It’s a work in progress,” Newsom said at a Wednesday press conference in Vallejo. “We are in the process of negotiating and discussing it with them.”

The last-minute proposal comes after a Worthe-linked company spent $270,000 between January and June lobbying the Legislature and the governor’s office on Zbur’s legislation and other budget issues, according to state lobbying records. Lobbyist Bob Giroux reported receiving the payments from Catalina Media Development LLC, which is affiliated with Worthe’s real estate company.

Worthe did not respond to an email inquiry from CalMatters, and Giroux could not be reached immediately for comment.

What the bill would do

Under the proposal, only housing projects in Santa Monica that meet a narrow set of criteria would benefit from the coastal act exemptions.

The measure would only apply to a residential or mixed-use development, and would not apply to a hotel or residential inn. Qualifying housing projects must meet certain labor standards and sustainability requirements. The sites must be in urban areas and must not be near wetlands, environmentally sensitive areas or too close to the ocean.

But one criterion stands out: The qualifying project must include a museum honoring Gehry’s work with written authorization from Gehry’s trustees.

The only project that seems to check all the boxes is Worthe’s proposed mixed-use development at the corner of Santa Monica Boulevard and Ocean Avenue.

The previously approved plans included a 120-room hotel, 100 apartments that would include some affordable units, more than 70,000 square feet for commercial and “cultural use,” a 5,000-square-foot rooftop observation deck and nearly 300 parking spaces.

In an agreement with the city council, Worthe agreed to pay $6 million toward city transportation, parks and recreation, affordable housing, early childhood programs and economic development initiatives in exchange for building the project. In 2023, at the coastal commission staff’s suggestion, he also agreed to contribute another $6.5 million to a youth hostel next to the project site to provide lower-cost housing in the area.

Newsom’s proposal would only kick in if the city fails to certify its local coastal plan by 2028.

Under the measure, the coastal commission must publicly hear the project application within 90 days and make a decision within 30 days. The proposal assumes that the project complies with environmental regulations unless the commission proves the development would “result in a specific, adverse and unavoidable impact” to the environment.

But the state should not try to rush the design of complicated land use policies, Jordan argued.

“If that means you need to go six months over a deadline, then you should do that, and you should not be penalized by making the correct decision,” Jordan said.

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

Just days after the U.S. Supreme Court gave President Donald Trump a procedural win in his effort to limit mail-in voting, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a new lawsuit intended to protect the state’s power over how elections are administered.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Massachusetts on Wednesday, makes good on Gov. Gavin Newsom’s pledge to sue again over Trump’s mail-in voting executive order immediately after the Supreme Court decision.

California is able to sue despite the high court’s ruling because of developments that occurred after justices took up the previous case.

The court majority this week essentially ruled that California sued too early over the executive order and it noted that the administration had not yet handed down formal rules that would affect voting.

That changed late last week when the U.S. Postal Service issued final rules requiring states to turn over a list of eligible mail voters, redesign ballot envelopes with the Postal Service’s approval and include new tracking barcodes.

Under Trump’s order, the Postal Service would not deliver ballots to voters who are not in a federal database the administration wants to build, and would not deliver ballots in states that do not comply with its rules.

Bonta called the Postal Service rules a “clear violation of the Constitution,” which designates states as the primary authority over elections.

The Democratic-led states joining with California in the lawsuit argue that because neither the president nor the Postal Service have the constitutional authority to run elections, the latest changes are unlawful and will undermine mail-in voting — including the more than 89% of voters in California who used mail-in ballots in the latest June primary.

“President Trump doesn’t get to rewrite our voting system on a whim,” said Bonta during an online press conference Wednesday. “And the United States Postal Service cannot sidestep the laws that govern the postal service just to carry out the president’s agenda.”

Although Trump uses mail-in voting himself, he is an outspoken critic of the method, citing unsubstantiated claims that it increases voter fraud. Last year he said he wanted to “lead a movement to get rid of mail-in ballots.”

Given its challenges in court, it is unclear whether the Postal Service’s new rule will affect the November elections.

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.