Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Advocates seek funding to keep children enrolled
    A woman holding a child on her hip is pictured from behind. She is standing at a pharmacy counter. A woman wearing black glasses and a white lab coat stands behind the counter.
    California voters passed Proposition 35 to increase Medi-Cal payments for various healthcare services. Here, a patient waits in line to pick up a prescription at La Clinica in Oakland.

    Topline:

    California's children's advocates are asking Gov. Gavin Newsom to provide funding for low-income children to stay on Medi-Cal without renewal requirements until age 5.

    The backstory: Each year nearly 400,000 children with Medi-Cal health insurance lose coverage for a period of time and then must re-enroll. Often they still qualify for publicly subsidized healthcare but get kicked off because of administrative errors or lost paperwork. Sometimes their families miss the income cutoff by a couple hundred dollars for a few months.

    Why now: The federal government must approve California spending Medi-Cal dollars this way, but the Trump administration's executive order on federal spending and attempted funding freeze signaled an intent to make deep cuts to a variety of social safety net programs.

    Read on ... to learn about the role of Proposition 35, which was approved by voters in November and raised payments for doctors and other providers.

    Each year nearly 400,000 children with Medi-Cal health insurance lose coverage for a period of time and then must re-enroll. Often they still qualify for publicly subsidized healthcare but get kicked off because of administrative errors or lost paperwork. Sometimes their families miss the income cutoff by a couple of hundred dollars for a few months.

    That’s a problem, advocates say, because early childhood comes with a host of vital health checks, vaccinations and developmental screenings. Without them, kids are at risk of falling behind on language development and social behaviors or missing early disease detection.

    California tried to close that coverage gap in last year’s budget, but a November ballot initiative erased that investment even as it improved payments to doctors, clinics and hospitals that serve low-income households.

    Now, children’s advocates are asking Gov. Gavin Newsom to try again and provide money for all low-income children to stay on Medi-Cal without renewal requirements until age 5 — but they concede it may already be too late.

    The federal government must approve California spending Medi-Cal dollars this way, but the Trump administration’s executive order on federal spending and attempted funding freeze signaled an intent to make deep cuts to a variety of social safety net programs .

    Still advocates say they are moving forward with their request for Newsom.

    “This is a clear opportunity to address systemic barriers that hinder Medi-Cal access,” said Mayra Alvarez, president of the Children’s Partnership, the organization leading the funding request.

    Statewide, about 56% of all children rely on Medi-Cal insurance.

    Last year, in the midst of a multibillion-dollar deficit, Newsom and state legislators agreed to spend $33 million to fund the program starting in 2026. The money would draw from one of the only growing revenue streams available to the state during a tight year, a special tax on health insurance plans that helps fund Medi-Cal.

    But the bill Newsom signed had a catch. It stipulated that if voters passed a ballot measure to invest a majority of the health insurance tax money on pay increases for Medi-Cal doctors, then continuous coverage and other investments made by lawmakers in the state budget would not be funded.

    The ballot measure passed with an overwhelming 68% of votes.

    Supporters argued, and voters agreed, that the nearly $7 billion raised by the health insurance tax annually should be used to shore up the state’s expansive and often strained public health insurance program. Pay increases would encourage more doctors and clinics to accept Medi-Cal patients, supporters argued.

    This time around, advocates are less certain that the state would be able to spend money on continuous coverage for kids even if lawmakers agree to fund it.

    Early congressional budget discussions indicate the GOP-controlled government wants to significantly reduce Medicaid spending . Medi-Cal is California’s version of the federal Medicaid program.

    California can’t go alone on Medi-Cal change

    California would need a waiver from the Trump administration to use the money from the health insurance tax in the way that advocates want.

    “Our plan as a coalition is to continue moving forward and asking for the funding to be allocated and the waiver to be submitted,” said Courtney Armstrong, director of government affairs for the First 5 Association of California. “I don’t know what the likelihood is of the waiver being approved or not. Obviously it’s in the context of bigger threats to Medicaid. Potentially [the Trump Administration] is amenable to the argument that kids need access to health coverage.”

    Advocates had pressured the state last year to submit a waiver request to invest in the program before President Joe Biden left office, but the Department of Health Care Services stopped pursuing the issue after the ballot measure passed in November.

    According to a statement from the Department of Health Care Services, without funding it could no longer pursue the waiver request.

    “The passage of Proposition 35 makes inoperative continuous coverage for children up to age 4” as lawmakers authorized last year, the statement from health care services said.

    Medi-Cal kids are vulnerable

    Providers who serve Medi-Cal patients say preventing kids from losing health insurance is critically important in their early years. Kids need regular pediatric checks and follow-up care. When they lose insurance, even temporarily, doctors and insurers also lose the ability to track and make sure they’re getting services on-time and not missing critical check points.

    “This is singularly the most vulnerable population that we serve,” said Michael Hunn, chief executive officer of CalOptima Health, the largest Medi-Cal plan in Orange County. “We value and strongly recommend this continuous coverage because of what it means to set the health trajectory of an individual from little on.”

    CalOptima serves nearly 74,000 children ages 0 to 5 and covers about 6,000 births each year, Hunn said.

    “What I’m most concerned about with this change in continuous eligibility is that parents will have to make a choice between the medical care of their child and rent or food, and that is a very difficult place to put a family,” Hunn said.

    For a few years during the federal COVID-19 emergency, eligibility checks were paused nationwide. During that time, the percentage of kids who “churn” in and out of Medi-Cal within one year dropped from 7.5% to 1%, according to Children’s Partnership, the group leading the budget ask. When the federal emergency ended, rates went back up.

    “The writing was on the wall that this type of policy could avoid any child between 0 and 5 losing their care,” Alvarez with Children’s Partnership said.

    One of the most frequent reasons why people lose Medi-Cal coverage is that their income exceeds the cutoff by $200, sometimes even less than $100, said Georgina Maldonado, executive director of the Community Health Initiative of Orange County, a nonprofit that helps people apply for Medi-Cal and other social services.

    “The federal poverty level chart is not realistic for those that reside in California,” Maldonado said.

    Supported by the California Health Care Foundation (CHCF), which works to ensure that people have access to the care they need, when they need it, at a price they can afford. Visit www.chcf.org to learn more.

  • Here’s how you can get involved
    A view of Los Angeles City Hall from below, with a tall palm tree in the forefront and the light blue sky in the background.
    L.A. City Hall in downtown Los Angeles on April 21.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles is working on its first major overhaul of the city’s charter — the document that acts as the city’s constitution for how government is run — in more than 25 years. Now there’s a new way residents can get involved. Applications are open for Angelenos who want to be a part of an upcoming mini civic assembly on charter reform.

    The details: The L.A. Charter Reform Commission, a civilian board with 13 appointed commissioners, recently endorsed these mini assemblies and pledged to hear their recommendations at commission meetings. This group selected from the applications will come up with a set of suggestions for updating the rules on how L.A. is run and present them to the commission for consideration.

    What’s a civic assembly? It’s a process by which a small group of residents get together and work out solutions to thorny community problems . Think of it as an intensive, in-person group project. Members are chosen by lottery but also selected to be demographically representative by factors like age, race or geography.

    When is the assembly and how do I apply? The first mini assembly, organized by a coalition called Rewrite LA , takes place Dec. 13 at the Institute of Contemporary Art in downtown L.A. Forty people will be selected, and this session will focus on one specific topic related to charter reform. If you’re interested, apply on Rewrite LA’s website by Tuesday .

    How else can I weigh in on charter reform if I don’t get picked? There are more assemblies planned for 2026. In the meantime, Rewrite LA is asking residents to share their thoughts here for what the assembly should address and how the city should be run. You can also give public comment at upcoming Charter Reform Commission meetings or submit written comments at ReformLAcharter@lacity.org .

    Go deeper: 

    Los Angeles is working on its first major overhaul of the city’s charter — the document that acts as the city’s constitution for how government is run — in more than 25 years. Now there’s a new way residents can get involved. Applications are open for Angelenos who want to be a part of an upcoming mini civic assembly on charter reform.

    The details

    The L.A. Charter Reform Commission, a civilian board with 13 appointed commissioners, recently endorsed these mini assemblies and pledged to hear their recommendations at commission meetings. This group selected from the applications will come up with a set of suggestions for updating the rules on how L.A. is run and present them to the commission for consideration.

    Several groups of people sit at tables full of papers and colored sticky notes in a recreation center.
    A mock civic assembly taking place in Culver City on June 7.
    (
    Brianna Lee
    /
    LAist
    )

    What’s a civic assembly?

    It’s a process by which a small group of residents get together and work out solutions to thorny community problems . Think of it as an intensive, in-person group project. Members are chosen by lottery but also selected to be demographically representative by factors like age, race or geography.

    When is the assembly and how do I apply?

    The first mini assembly, organized by a coalition called Rewrite LA , takes place Dec. 13 at the Institute of Contemporary Art in downtown L.A. Forty people will be selected, and this session will focus on one specific topic related to charter reform. If you’re interested, apply on Rewrite LA’s website by Tuesday .

    How else can I weigh in on charter reform if I don’t get picked?

    There are more assemblies planned for 2026. In the meantime, Rewrite LA is asking residents to share their thoughts here for what the assembly should address and how the city should be run. You also can give public comment at upcoming Charter Reform Commission meetings or submit written comments at ReformLAcharter@lacity.org .

    Go deeper 

  • Sponsored message
  • SCOTUS extends full block, continuing chaos

    Topline:

    The Supreme Court today extended an order blocking full SNAP payments, amid signals that the government shutdown could soon end and food aid payments resume.

    What it means: The order keeps in place at least for a few more days a chaotic situation. People who depend on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to feed their families in some states have received their full monthly allocations, while others have received nothing.

    What's next: The order will expire just before midnight Thursday. The Senate has approved a bill to end the shutdown and the House of Representatives could vote on it as early as Wednesday. Reopening the government would restart the program that helps 42 million Americans buy groceries, but it's not clear how quickly full payments would resume.

    The Supreme Court on Tuesday extended an order blocking full SNAP payments, amid signals that the government shutdown could soon end and food aid payments resume.

    The order keeps in place at least for a few more days a chaotic situation. People who depend on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to feed their families in some states have received their full monthly allocations, while others have received nothing.

    The order will expire just before midnight Thursday.

    The Senate has approved a bill to end the shutdown and the House of Representatives could vote on it as early as Wednesday. Reopening the government would restart the program that helps 42 million Americans buy groceries, but it's not clear how quickly full payments would resume.

    The justices chose what is effectively the path of least resistance, anticipating the federal government shutdown will end soon while avoiding any substantive legal ruling about whether lower court orders to keep full payments flowing during the shutdown are correct.

    Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only one of the nine justices to say she would have revived the lower court orders immediately, but didn't otherwise explain her vote. Jackson signed the initial order temporarily freezing the payments.

    Beneficiaries in some states have received their full monthly allocations while in others they have received nothing. Some states have issued partial payments.

    How quickly SNAP benefits could reach recipients if the government reopens would vary by state. But states and advocates say that it's easier to make full payments quickly than partial ones.

    Carolyn Vega, a policy analyst at the advocacy group Share Our Strength, also said there could be some technical challenges for states that have issued partial benefits to send out the remaining amount.

    An urgent need for beneficiaries

    In Pennsylvania, full November benefits went out to some people on Friday. But Jim Malliard, 41, of Franklin, said he had not received anything by Monday.

    Malliard is a full-time caretaker for his wife, who is blind and has had several strokes this year, and his teenage daughter, who suffered severe medical complications from surgery last year.

    That stress has only been compounded by the pause in the $350 monthly SNAP payment he previously received for himself, his wife and daughter. He said he is down to $10 in his account and is relying on what's left in the pantry — mostly rice and ramen.

    "It's kind of been a lot of late nights, making sure I had everything down to the penny to make sure I was right," Malliard said. "To say anxiety has been my issue for the past two weeks is putting it mildly."

    The political wrangling in Washington has shocked many Americans, and some have been moved to help.

    "I figure that I've spent money on dumber stuff than trying to feed other people during a manufactured famine," said Ashley Oxenford, a teacher who set out a "little food pantry" in her front yard this week for vulnerable neighbors in Carthage, New York.

    SNAP has been the center of an intense fight in court

    The Trump administration chose to cut off SNAP funding after October due to the shutdown. That decision sparked lawsuits and a string of swift and contradictory judicial rulings that deal with government power — and impact food access for about 1 in 8 Americans.

    The administration went along with two rulings on Oct. 31 by judges who said the government must provide at least partial funding for SNAP. It eventually said recipients would get up to 65% of their regular benefits. But it balked last week when one of the judges said it must fund the program fully for November, even if that means digging into funds the government said need to be maintained in case of emergencies elsewhere.

    The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to pause that order.

    An appeals court said Monday that full funding should resume, and that requirement was set to kick in Tuesday night before the top court extended the order blocking full SNAP payments.

    Congressional talks about reopening government

    The U.S. Senate on Monday passed legislation to reopen the federal government with a plan that would include replenishing SNAP funds. Speaker Mike Johnson told members of the House to return to Washington to consider the deal a small group of Senate Democrats made with Republicans.

    President Trump has not said whether he would sign it if it reaches his desk, but told reporters at the White House on Sunday that it "looks like we're getting close to the shutdown ending."

    Still, the Trump administration said in a Supreme Court filing Monday that it shouldn't be up to the courts.

    "The answer to this crisis is not for federal courts to reallocate resources without lawful authority," Solicitor General D. John Sauer said in the papers. "The only way to end this crisis — which the Executive is adamant to end — is for Congress to reopen the government."

    After Tuesday's ruling, Attorney General Pam Bondi posted on social media: "Thank you to the Court for allowing Congress to continue its swift progress."

    The coalition of cities and nonprofit groups who challenged the SNAP pause said in a court filing Tuesday that the Department of Agriculture, which administers SNAP, is to blame for the confusion.

    "The chaos was sown by USDA's delays and intransigence," they said, "not by the district court's efforts to mitigate that chaos and the harm it has inflicted on families who need food."
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Why they may linger past government reopening

    Topline:

    Flight disruptions are likely to continue even after the government reopens, airlines and aviation regulators warned, as airlines canceled scores of flights today.

    Where things stand: The Federal Aviation Administration ordered airlines to reduce air traffic at 40 of the nation's busiest airports, with cuts still ramping up to 10% of flights by Friday.

    Why now: This past weekend, the FAA reported staffing shortages at dozens of facilities, prompting the agency to slow air traffic to relieve pressure on air traffic controllers who did show up to work. Today, airlines canceled more than 1,200 flights, according to the aviation tracking site FlightAware.

    Keep reading... for what to expect next.

    WASHINGTON — Flight disruptions are likely to continue even after the government reopens , airlines and aviation regulators warned, as airlines canceled scores of flights on Tuesday.

    The Federal Aviation Administration ordered airlines to reduce air traffic at 40 of the nation's busiest airports, with cuts still ramping up to 10% of flights by Friday. The agency has been dealing with persistent staffing shortages of air traffic controllers , who are required to work without pay during the shutdown, which is now the longest in U.S. history at 42 days and counting.

    This past weekend, the FAA reported staffing shortages at dozens of facilities, prompting the agency to slow air traffic to relieve pressure on air traffic controllers who did show up to work. On Tuesday, airlines canceled more than 1,200 flights, according to the aviation tracking site FlightAware .

    The situation seemed to be improving somewhat on Tuesday, according to Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, with only a handful of FAA facilities reporting staffing shortages. But Duffy said that air traffic restrictions would remain in place until regulators are satisfied that staffing is back to normal levels.

    "We're going to wait to see the data on our end before we take out the restrictions in travel," Duffy said during a press conference at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport. "But it depends on controllers coming back to work."

    Even when those restrictions are lifted, it may take several days for airlines to return to normal operations.

    "It's gonna take a bit to unwind," said former FAA administrator Randy Babbitt in an interview with NPR's All Things Considered.

    "The airplanes are in the wrong cities and so forth. They're going to have to sort all that out as well. So a good deal of the responsibility will be the carriers getting their schedules and the aircraft and personnel back in the right positions to resume normal flying," Babbitt said.

    Sean Duffy at a lectern with the seal of the Dept. of Transportation
    U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said Tuesday that airlines may have to "stop flying" if Congressional lawmakers don't vote to end the government shutdown.
    (
    Seth Wenig
    /
    AP
    )

    An aviation industry trade group, Airlines for America, also warned that it will take time for carriers to get back to normal.

    "Airlines' reduced flight schedules cannot immediately bounce back to full capacity right after the government reopens. It will take time, and there will be residual effects for days," the group said in a statement.

    The FAA argues the flight restrictions are necessary to keep the system safe while fewer air traffic controllers are showing up to work during the government shutdown. Some of those controllers have taken on second jobs during the shutdown, and many have called in sick.

    But to the Trump administration's critics, the move appears to be about more than just safety. Some Democrats argue that the cuts were a political ploy to raise the pressure to end the government shutdown.

    Secretary Duffy rejected that charge on Tuesday, saying the administration was responding to real concerns from pilots and mounting concerns about increasing loss of separation between aircraft.

    And he warned of even bigger disruptions ahead if lawmakers do not vote to end the shutdown .

    "You may find airlines that stop flying, full stop," Duffy said in Chicago. "You might have airlines that say, we're going to ground our planes, we're not going to fly anymore. That's how serious this is."
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Angelenos share their favorites over the years
    A billboard in blue and yellow advertising for a personal injury lawyer named Anh Phoong.
    Lawyer Anh Phoong is the latest entrant into the crowded field of personal injury lawyers that advertise on billboards in L.A.

    Topline:

    Over the decades, L.A. has become known for its wildly fun stock of iconic billboards. Angelenos called into LAist 89.3’s AirTalk recently to talk about their most memorable ones.

    Oldie but a goodie: One among the favorites hails back from the ‘60s, when the Beatles graced the Sunset Strip. Robert Landau, author of Rock ‘N’ Roll Billboards on the Sunset Strip, said this era was like a drive-through art gallery.

    Zero context: Sometimes, you don’t need a lot of words to get your message across. That was the case with another caller favorite: Angelyne’s dozens of bright pink billboards, which only have a picture of herself and her name. Tommy Wiseau’s billboard to promote The Room also loomed above L.A. for years with little explanation.

    Read on… to see what the billboards looked like.

    Los Angeles billboard culture is memorable, to say the least.

    Our attorney billboards have inspired Hollywood . Creative STD prevention ads have reminded people about safety in weirdly direct ways. Even upside down “ Call Jacob ” and “ hate vegans ” billboards have left a confusing impression.

    In a world of drab advertisements, every so often the cream of the crop rises to the top. LAist 89.3’s AirTalk unpacked some of those iconic memories recently. Here’s what listeners shared.

    Billboards for music

    A wide look at a large billboard above gray and red cards in a parking lot. In the image is the Bealtes members, who are walking in a line over a crosswalk.
    Billboard for Beatles Abbey Road record circa 1969 on the Sunset Strip.
    (
    Courtesy Robert Landau
    )

    Robert Landau, photographer and author of Rock ‘N’ Roll Billboards of the Sunset Strip , has spent years documenting these scenes. He says you have to be clever to plant a seed in drivers’ minds in only a few seconds.

    “ We’re such a car-oriented culture that we take this advertising form of billboards and maybe raise it to an art form,” he told host Austin Cross.

    One that he remembers vividly is the Beatles’ Abbey Road billboard in 1969.

    He said this period was about rock ‘n’ roll music. The bands he listened to were depicted on what he called artistic, almost non-commercial billboards on the Sunset Strip.

    “[It created] almost a drive through gallery at that time,” he said.

    Tommy Wiseau’s “The Room”

    Sam, a listener from Atwater Village, called to share one billboard that lives rent free in his mind.

    “ If you traveled in Hollywood on Highland, anytime in the early two thousands,” he said, “you saw the billboard for the Tommy Wiseau movie The Room.”

    The billboard was up for years and had little information about what it was actually about. A black-and-white Wiseau stared down passersby next to directions to call a number on the billboard to “RSVP.” (To the movie? A meeting? Who knew.)

    It became a sort of local mystery while the movie reached cult-like status .

    The Angelyne campaigns

    Another one L.A. won’t soon forget is model Angelyne’s plethora of billboards that have dotted the skyline for decades. Yes, decades .

    Michael in Studio City said he’s always found the billboard queen entertaining. They’re known for being bright pink and showing Angelyne, usually in a suggestive or sultry pose, alongside just her name.

    “I was confused about what necessarily she was going for other than notoriety,” he said.

    We could go on forever about L.A.’s hodgepodge of excellent billboards. What’s one that sticks out to you? Send your thoughts to chernandez@laist.com and we may follow up.