Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • How to protect yourself and your furry friends

    Topline:

    Bird flu or avian influenza has a grip on dairy herds in California. Here's what to know about how likely it is you might contract it and how to also keep your pets safe.

    Can humans contract the bird flu? Yes, though the strain of highly pathogenic avian influenza — so named because of its lethality in poultry — driving the current outbreak has not adapted to easily infect humans, meaning it's still "essentially a bird virus," says Richard Webby, a virologist who studies avian influenza at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.

    Who is more likely at risk? During the current outbreak, poultry workers have generally caught the virus while they're culling infected flocks. This is considered a high risk activity because it can involve handling infected animals and spending long stretches of time in facilities where viral particles in their saliva, mucus and poop can hang in the air and contaminate surfaces.

    Keep your pets safe: Give your cats a little bit more supervision when they're outside. Keep them away from wild birds (dead or alive) and rodents, especially if you live on a farm or have backyard poultry. Cats are largely infected with bird flu by consuming raw contaminated meat and by preying on wild birds, including during the current outbreak.

    Avian influenza has a grip on dairy herds in California, a few people have fallen seriously ill in North America and researchers have found that a single mutation could give the virus a better foothold in a person's upper airways.

    At the same time, those who're tracking avian influenza's footsteps say most of us don't need to be preoccupied with the virus as we go about our day, at least for now.

    "We're really on alert," says Benjamin Anderson, an infectious disease epidemiologist at the University of Florida. "It's a tricky thing to communicate."

    Fears that H5N1 bird flu could unleash a pandemic go back decades, and previous strains of the virus have proven quite deadly in humans. That has not been the case during this current outbreak. Most infections linked to the strain of bird flu circulating globally in wild birds and U.S. dairy herds — technically known as clade 2.3.4.4b — have been mild.

    But two recent cases are a reminder this isn't a foregone conclusion.

    First, a teenager in Canada was hospitalized, as was a Louisiana resident who was exposed to backyard flocks. In each, genetic analysis suggests mutations may have emerged as the virus replicated inside of them. However, there's no evidence any of this has led to human-to-human spread.

    "The difficult thing is it's hard to know how much of a heads up we're going to get that things are changing," says Richard Webby, a virologist who studies avian influenza at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.

    Here's what some experts are saying now.

    Should I be worried about catching bird flu?  

    Despite its wide reach, the strain of highly pathogenic avian influenza — so named because of its lethality in poultry — driving the current outbreak has not adapted to easily infect humans, meaning it's still "essentially a bird virus," says Webby.

    Of the more than 65 human cases in the U.S., almost all of them can be traced back to some kind of close contact with infected poultry, wild birds, or dairy cattle. So, if you're not dealing directly with any of these animals, the chance of catching the virus in its current form remains quite low.

    Unlike the seasonal influenza viruses, bird flu doesn't attack the cell receptors that predominate in a person's upper airways. Instead, it prefers "avian-type receptors" deep in the lungs and in the mucus membranes around the eyes, which seems to explain why many recent human cases have presented as conjunctivitis.

    "It's not actually very good at infecting people," says Anderson. "What we typically have seen is a lot of viral exposure in order to be infected."

    A few cases have popped up with unexplained origins in California, Missouri, and British Columbia. However, there's no indication any of the people contracted the virus from another human, or spread it to anyone else.

    For now, the concern is more about what could transpire as more animals and humans get infected, says Kristen Coleman, who researches airborne infectious diseases at the University of Maryland. "It's not an immediate risk, but that's not to say that it won't be a risk in the near future."

    That's because every spillover into mammals, including humans, puts added pressure on the virus to adapt to its new host, raising the prospect that certain mutations pop up, which could, under the right circumstance, let the virus more efficiently replicate and infect people.

    Scientists already have an idea of what some of the most concerning changes would look like (at least to some extent), and it doesn't appear they've caught on yet, based on testing done in poultry and cattle.

    But it's evident this particular strain of H5N1 is sickening a much broader range of mammals than previous ones, says Seema Lakdawala, an influenza researcher at Emory University.

    "We don't know why yet, but it could be chance or a precise genetic feature," she says.

    What does "close contact" with a bird look like exactly? 

    During the current outbreak, poultry workers have generally caught the virus while they're culling infected flocks.

    This is considered a high risk activity because it can involve handling the animals and spending long stretches of time in facilities where viral particles in their saliva, mucus and poop can hang in the air and contaminate surfaces. For example, workers in Colorado were infected while depopulating birds in hot barns with industrial fans blowing. They struggled to wear personal protective equipment over their mouths, nose and eyes because of the heat.

    Historically, human cases of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 have often been traced back to live bird markets. In this context, people tend to be handling, defeathering, butchering and preparing the animals for sale.

    High concentrations of viral particles can spew into the air and be inhaled, or coat surfaces and hands, eventually ending up on your eyes and nose, perhaps after you rub your face, says Webby. "If you're just walking past an infected bird, it's extremely unlikely that you're going to get it that way."

    Coleman agrees. In a study carried out before this latest outbreak, she sampled the air at a massive live market in Vietnam and discovered it was filled with aerosolized bird flu virus. They could even grow infectious viruses from their samples. Yet, none of the people they tested there had active infections.

    Okay, I'm not butchering or touching any birds, but do I need to stop using my bird feeder? What about touching bird poop? 

    For the average person, it's unlikely you'd get infected from a stray piece of bird poop or from touching your bird feeder, although there isn't necessarily data on these specific scenarios, says Anderson.

    How long H5N1 bird flu survives on objects depends on a variety of factors. For example, it can survive for days or even weeks under certain colder conditions and in water. Contracting the virus from a contaminated surface is a legitimate concern for people who are "handling equipment associated with animal care on poultry or dairy farms," says Lakdawala, adding that people should be cautious at petting zoos and agricultural fairs, too.

    Bird poop can harbor high loads of the virus, possibly for long stretches of time, but Webby doubts it would be a concern for more than a few days after being exposed to the elements on your porch or deck.

    "If you had things that had bird poop on them, yes, you would want to avoid that or disinfect it," says Anderson.

    You could do the same for your bird feeder. He says just use common sense hygiene principles like washing your hands and avoid touching your face before hand washing.

    People who have backyard flocks should be particularly cognizant of the risk, especially if they live in the path of migratory birds. Do your best to keep your poultry from mixing with wild birds. If you're concerned, you can wear an N95 mask around them.

    What's the deal with dairy cattle? Do I need to worry about milk? 

    Unless you're spending time with dairy cattle or raw milk, there's no reason to be concerned.

    The spread of bird flu in dairy cattle took scientists by surprise. The best guess is a spillover from birds into dairy cattle in late 2023 was enough to set in motion the nationwide outbreak in dairy cattle today.

    The U.S. Food & Drug Administration has found pasteurizing milk can effectively inactivate the virus. The same is true for pasteurized eggs products, and if eggs are cooked to 165 degrees

    There's now "strong" evidence that contact with raw milk, laden with high concentrations of virus, is how roughly 40 dairy workers have become infected, says Anderson. Most likely this is happening in the milking parlor when people are sprayed in the face, or viral particles are aerosolized and inhaled.

    Research has shown that raw milk can "stabilize the virus on a variety of surfaces for long periods of time," says Lakdawala. Hence the warnings against drinking raw milk.

    Even relatively small amounts can be deadly for mice, according to lab experiments done by Peter Halfmann and his colleagues at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. "But we don't know how this exactly would work in humans," he says. "It's still a big black box."

    While the exact risk is unknown, Lakdawala considers consuming raw milk a "high risk activity," especially in states like California where bird flu has been found in some of these products.

    Dr. Jürgen Richt, a veterinary microbiologist at Kansas State University, echoes that sentiment.

    "Is the mouse a good model for humans? I don't know," says Richt. "But don't become a guinea pig."

    What should I be doing to protect my pets? 

    The basic principles for keeping yourself safe from bird flu also apply to your pets.

    Coleman's advice: Give your cats a little bit more supervision when they're outside. Keep them away from wild birds (dead or alive) and rodents, especially if you live on a farm or have backyard poultry.

    Coleman recently reviewed the data, and found this current strain of bird flu looks to be more deadly in felines than it is for H5N1 overall, although it's hard to say because of limited data.

    She says cats are largely infected with bird flu by consuming raw contaminated meat and by preying on wild birds, including during the current outbreak.

    In Oregon, a house cat died after consuming raw pet food, riddled with the virus, which prompted a nationwide recall. It's possible that contaminated meat was behind an outbreak that wiped out 20 cats at a wildlife sanctuary in Washington state. In Los Angeles, raw milk is implicated in the death of several house cats.

    Dogs are also susceptible. Last year, a dog in Canada died from the infection after it was found chewing on a dead goose.

    While pets can develop respiratory symptoms, the infection can manifest as a neurological illness, seeming to mimic rabies, she says. "If your cat or your dog starts acting funny, maybe circling or acting rabid, make sure to contact a veterinarian right away."

    There have only been a few documented cases of feline-to-human transmission of avian influenza, after people tending to the animals had direct contact, but not during this current outbreak.

    Anderson says "there's no need to panic" that your pet is going to be getting H5N1 tomorrow, especially if you keep them from these known sources of infection.

    "It's just about being aware," he says.

    Copyright 2024 NPR. To see more, visit npr.org.


  • FDA chief hints at overhaul

    Topline:

    The Food and Drug Administration intends to get tougher on vaccine approvals, as top officials raised concerns about the risk of COVID vaccines for children.

    Why now: Speaking on Fox News Saturday morning, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency would no longer "rubber-stamp new products that don't work," claiming it made a "mockery of science."

    Background: Makary's comments came the day after FDA's top vaccine regulator, Dr. Vinay Prasad, told his team the agency would change its annual flu vaccine framework, update vaccine labels to be "honest," and make other changes to how it reviews vaccines, according to contents of an internal email reviewed by NPR and reported on first by a PBS News Hour correspondent and later by The Washington Post.

    The Food and Drug Administration intends to get tougher on vaccine approvals, as top officials raised concerns about the risk of COVID vaccines for children.

    Speaking on Fox News Saturday morning, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency would no longer "rubber-stamp new products that don't work," claiming it made a "mockery of science."

    Makary's comments came the day after FDA's top vaccine regulator, Dr. Vinay Prasad, told his team the agency would change its annual flu vaccine framework, update vaccine labels to be "honest," and make other changes to how it reviews vaccines, according to contents of an internal email reviewed by NPR and reported on first by a PBS News Hour correspondent and later by The Washington Post.

    Prasad wrote that the FDA would also no longer authorize vaccines for pregnant women without stricter requirements. And for pneumonia vaccines, manufacturers will have to prove they reduce disease rather than show they generate antibodies. He also raised questions about giving multiple vaccines at the same time, which is standard practice.

    The changes could make it much more difficult and expensive for vaccines to get approved, further limiting the availability of vaccines, which are considered among the safest and most effective tools for protecting people against infectious diseases.

    While all vaccines carry some risks, most public health experts argue the current process for vetting vaccines before marketing has long assured that the benefits of vaccines outweigh their risks. Studies required after vaccines are approved and surveillance systems, including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), also flag potential safety issues once vaccines are in use.

    FDA says an analysis links COVID shots to some deaths

    Makary said on Fox News that 10 children had died from the COVID shot during the Biden administration, but did not offer specifics about how the FDA came to that conclusion. Millions of children have received the vaccine. 

    Officials with the Department of Health and Human Services and Food and Drug Administration didn't immediately respond to requests for comment on the COVID analysis and changes to vaccine review standards.

    According to the FDA email from Prasad, he told the agency's biostatistics and pharmacovigilance team to analyze 96 reported deaths from 2021 to 2024, and they determined 10 children died "after and because of" the COVID vaccine. But Prasad said the true number was likely higher.

    Dr. Paul Offit, who directs the Vaccine Education Center at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, said in a text message that Prasad has not shared the evidence that these vaccines killed 10 children.

    "Because he doesn't provide any evidence, he is asking us to trust him on an important issue," Office said. "All this will do is scare people unnecessarily. At the very least, he should provide all the evidence he has so that experts in the field can review it and decide whether he has enough data to prove his point."

    Dr. Jesse Goodman, a professor at Georgetown University who held Prasad's job at FDA from 2003 until 2009, said in an email that the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, which oversees vaccine approval, has been "recognized globally as a gold standard regulator." Goodman defended "immunologic endpoints like antibody levels" for the accelerated approval of pneumonia and influenza vaccines. He said science supports their use and they are confirmed with studies after approval: "These approaches have helped provide children and adults with timely access to safe and effective vaccines, saving many lives."

    Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota, reviewed the email from Prasad and challenged his statement that "COVID-19 was never highly lethal for children." Osterholm also questioned the FDA's latest analysis of adverse event reports attributing the 10 deaths to COVID vaccines.

    "Prasad's email is filled with factual mistakes and misrepresents both the severity of COVID in children (1597 deaths in 2020-2022) and how the US responded to the first signals of possible vaccine-associated pediatric deaths in May 2021," Osterholm wrote in an email to NPR.

    "While Prasad's email notes 10 such deaths, these cases have never been presented for review by the medical and public health communities or published in the medical literature," Osterholm continued. "Given the record of this Administration to misrepresent scientific data regarding vaccines, until these cases have been reviewed by an expert third party, like the National Academy of Science[s], we can not accept the fact they are vaccine-associated deaths."

    Surveillance system collects vaccines reports

    The FDA makes public data from the VAERS surveillance system co-sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But the FDA cautions, "it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause and effect relationship has been established." In his email, Prasad wrote that "with case reports, causality is typically assessed on a subjective scale. In this scale ranging from certain to unlikely — certain, possible/likely, and probable are broadly considered as related to the product."

    Makary said on Fox News that when the COVID shot was first rolled out, it was "amazing" for people at high risk of coming down with severe disease, but things have changed.

    "Back in 2020, we saw a reduction in the severity of illness and lives saved, but now recommending that a 6-year-old girl get another 70 million COVID shots — one each year for the rest of her life — is not based on science. And so we're not going to just rubber stamp approvals without seeing some scientific evidence."

    The claim is the latest move by Trump administration health officials questioning the safety and effectiveness of vaccines and how the government has regulated them. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has long questioned vaccines.

    The FDA restricted eligibility for the updated COVID vaccines in August after announcing the agency planned to require more evidence about the shots' safety and effectiveness going forward.

    CDC committee will meet to review vaccine policies

    The FDA email on vaccine policy comes just before the CDC convenes a crucial two-day meeting of that agency's influential Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on Dec. 4-5. The committee is in the process of conducting a major review of how children are inoculated against dangerous infectious diseases such as measles, mumps, rubella, polio and hepatitis B.

    Many public health experts are concerned the committee will upend the childhood vaccination schedule. It could move to delay the timing of some inoculations, space out vaccinations and call for the reformulation of some vaccines. Taken together, the moves could result in fewer children getting protected and the resurgence of once-vanquished diseases.

    Asked about Makary and Prasad's claims that the COVID vaccine caused deaths among 10 children, Moderna, whose COVID vaccine is approved for children as young as 6 months old, pointed to a statement it made in September. The company says that multiple published, peer-reviewed studies from a variety of sources show its shot is safe and that it is "not aware of any deaths in the last year or pertinent new information from prior years."

    Moderna says it monitors its vaccine's safety along with regulators in more than 90 countries. "With more than one billion doses distributed globally, these systems — including in national health systems across Europe, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and the U.S. — have not reported any new or undisclosed safety concerns in children or in pregnant women."

    Pfizer did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Sponsor
  • Impact on community after immigration crackdown
    Afghan evacuees sit on a bus at the U.S. air base in Ramstein, Germany, on Aug. 26. Ramstein Air Base, the largest U.S. Air Force base in Europe, has hosted thousands of Afghans.
    Afghan evacuees at the U.S. air base in Ramstein, Germany in 2021.

    Topline:

    The Trump administration’s sudden freeze on all visa and asylum decisions for Afghan immigrants has left many of them in Orange County — one of the country's largest hubs for Afghans — in limbo. Local groups are preparing to support the immigrants even as they await clarification from federal authorities.

    Why it matters: California is home to the nation’s largest concentration of Afghan immigrants, many of them now grappling with the Trump administration’s abrupt visa and asylum freeze.

    Read on ... to learn more about the Afghan population in Orange County and guidance from one O.C. immigration official on what could come next.

    California is home to the nation’s largest concentration of Afghan immigrants, many of them now grappling with the Trump administration’s abrupt visa and asylum freeze.

    Friday’s announcement by the White House followed the fatal shooting of a National Guard member in Washington, D.C. a couple days earlier by a suspect who had immigrated from Afghanistan.

    In Orange County, where many Afghans have settled as their immigration applications pend, local officials are gearing up to help them navigate the change, even as guidance is scant from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

    Jose Serrano, director of Orange County's Office of Refugee and Immigrant Services, said the goal is to provide the “most up-to-date information so they can continue on towards their pathway towards citizenship here in the United States.”

    “The Afghan population in Southern California, specifically in Orange County, is one that is really important to the DNA of who we are,” Serrano said. “Let's continue to stay together and strong and reimagine a place for belonging for everyone.”

    As they await more information, Serrano advised visa and asylum seekers to:

    • stay on top of updates from USCIS and the Department of Homeland Security
    • contact their local office of immigrant and refugee affairs
    • connect with organizations that work closely with immigrant and refugee populations, such as resettlement agencies and legal aid groups

    The pull of OC

    Nearly 200,000 Afghans are in the U.S., with 39% of them residing in California, according to the Migration Policy Institute.

    Hundreds of Afghan households have settled in Orange County, Serrano said, making it one of the state’s hubs for Afghan immigrants alongside San Diego and Sacramento.

    Serrano said a big draw for immigrants to Orange County is Little Arabia in Anaheim, a regional destination for Middle Eastern food, culture and community life.

    Serrano, who spent more than a decade working with immigrants at World Relief Southern California and the state's refugee programs bureau, said entering Afghan homes means being offered large meals. One family had prepared a whole feast for a Time Warner cable worker, he recalled.

    “They didn't understand why that person couldn’t stay to dine with them,” he said. “That’s the type of people that are here in Orange County, folks who are so committed to being a part of civic engagement, to connecting alongside other communities.”

    Visa applications in limbo

    Serrano said many of the Afghans who resettled in the county are Special Immigrant Visa holders, a program created for Afghan nationals who helped the U.S. government during the war in their home country.

    That program has now been frozen by the State Department.

    Serrano said immigrants who entered the U.S. as refugees and have since become green card holders could see their cases reopened.

    Joseph Edlow, who leads USCIS, said the new immigration measures will last until “we can ensure that every alien is vetted and screened to the maximum degree possible.”

    For Serrano, the current screening process is rigorous and involves multiple organizations aside from USCIS, such as the U.S. Department of Justice, the F.B.I. and counterterrorist organizations.

    Applicants undergo health screenings and multiple fingerprinting appointments, he said.

    “They're constantly doing an assessment to verify that you are a good-standing citizen,” Serrano said. “One of the things that I think we should be very proud of within the United States is that there is an in-depth screening process for anyone who is seeking a protection.”

  • Four dead and 10 wounded in banquet hall shooting

    Topline:

    Four people were killed and 10 wounded in a shooting during a family gathering at a banquet hall in Stockton, sheriff's officials said Saturday.

    Details: The victims included both children and adults, said Heather Brent, a spokesperson for the San Joaquin County sheriff's office.

    What's next: Early indications "suggest this may have been a targeted incident," Brent said during a news conference at the scene. Local officials said the suspected shooter has not been caught and pleaded with the public for help. Detectives were still working to identify a possible motive.

    STOCKTON, Calif. — Four people were killed and 10 wounded in a shooting during a family gathering at a banquet hall in Stockton, sheriff's officials said Saturday.

    The victims included both children and adults, said Heather Brent, a spokesperson for the San Joaquin County sheriff's office. Early indications "suggest this may have been a targeted incident," Brent said during a news conference at the scene.

    Local officials said the suspected shooter has not been caught and pleaded with the public for help. Detectives were still working to identify a possible motive.

    "If you have any information as to this individual, reach out immediately. If you are this individual, turn yourself in immediately," San Joaquin County District Attorney Ron Freitas said during a news conference.

    The shooting occurred just before 6 p.m. inside the banquet hall, which shares a parking lot with other businesses. Stockton is a city of 320,000 about 40 miles (64 kilometers) south of Sacramento.

    "Families should be together instead of at the hospital, standing next to their loved one, praying that they survive," Mayor Christina Fugazzi said.

    Authorities did not immediately provide additional information about the conditions of the victims. Officials said earlier that several were taken to hospitals.

    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • The Stahl House is for sale, first time ever
    A mid-century modernist home with giant glass walls overlooking the city of Los Angeles. Two women dressed in white party dresses are sitting in the living room, chatting.
    The iconic photograph of the Stahl House taken by photographer Julius Shuman.

    Topline:

    The Stahl House, otherwise known as Case Study House #22, is on the market for the first time in its 65-year history.

    Why it matters: The midcentury modern home in the Hollywood Hills has come to embody the postwar Los Angeles good life. It is also one of the most recognizable examples of West Coast modernism.

    Why now: The house has been with the same family since its completion. But after caring for it for more than 6 decades, the Stahl children are looking for the house's next steward.

    Read on... For the fascinating history of the Stahl House. Find out why its original moniker is Case Study House #22, and see the photographs that have made the hilltop home a revered landmark.

    A quintessential piece of Los Angeles history — a jaw-dropping midcentury modern house of glass, steel and seemingly all skies soaring high above the Hollywood Hills — is up for sale.

    Asking price: $25 million.

    The Stahl House, otherwise known as Case Study House #22, has stayed with the same family since it was built in 1960.

    "After 65 years, our family has made the heartfelt and very difficult decision to place the Stahl House on the market," wrote the Stahl children, Bruce Stahl and Shari Stahl Gronwald.

    The 2,200-square-foot home at 1635 Woods Drive has been preserved meticulously, funded in part by proceeds from open-house tours of the space.

    "This home has been the center of our lives for decades, but as we’ve gotten older, it has become increasingly challenging to care for it with the attention and energy it so richly deserves," the Stahl children continued.

    And they are not just looking for a buyer — but a steward.

    "It is a passing of responsibility," the listing for the house reads. "A search for the next custodian who will honor the house's history, respect its architectural purity, and ensure its preservation for generations to come."

    Post-war housing shortage

    A black and white photo of a mid-century modern home taken from the outside looking into the living room.
    The Stahl House, or Case Study House #22, was designed and built by Pierre Koenig in the Hollywood Hills.
    (
    Julius Shulman
    /
    © J. Paul Getty Trust. Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles (2004.R.10)
    )

    The futuristic house, with its stunning panorama and a swimming pool perched at the edge of nothingness, has become one of the most recognizable and prized expressions of midcentury modern architecture in L.A. How it came to be built was fueled by a similar spirit of experimentation and audacity.

    In 1945, the cutting-edge Arts & Architecture magazine launched the "Case Study House" program to commission the era's biggest and most boundary-pushing architects — Richard Neutra, Charles Eames and the like — to design and build affordable, scalable homes for an exploding middle class after World War II.

    "Each house must be capable of duplication and in no sense be an 'individual' performance," editor John Entenza wrote in the announcement-slash-manifesto.

    By its terminus in 1966, the program gave rise to 36 designs, of which 25 prototypes were built — mostly in and around the city — forging L.A. into an epicenter of West Coast modernism.

    Case Study Home #22

    One of them was Case Study Home #22 by Pierre Koenig, who, as an architecture student at USC in the early 1950s, was already making a name for himself, particularly for his use of steel.

    His student work caught the attention of Entenza, who later invited him to join the Case Study House program.

    The Stahl family home

    The Hollywood Hills home would be Koenig's second Case Study house — and his most well-known.

    The story began with Hughes Aircraft purchasing agent and former football player Buck Stahl and his wife, Carlotta, who bought a small hillside lot overlooking the city for $13,500.

    The couple spent weekends putting up a wall around the property using broken concrete sourced from construction sites. Buck, the Stahl family said, had built a model of his dream house to take to architects — many of whom turned the job down because the lot was seen as undevelopable.

    A black and white photo of a vintage car from the 1950s or 1960s parked next to a rectangular structure.
    The Stahl House, part of the Case Study House program, was completed in 1960.
    (
    Julius Shulman
    /
    © J. Paul Getty Trust. Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles (2004.R.10)
    )

    Enter Koenig, who signed on for the challenge in 1957. A month before construction began in 1959, the project was christened Case Study House #22. The Stahl House was completed a year later, according to the Los Angeles Times, at a cost of nearly $38,000.

    The birth of cool

    With its sleek lines and inviting airiness, Case Study House #22 has come to embody the good life in postwar Los Angeles, an idea reinforced by its countless appearances in movies, TV shows and magazine spreads over the decades.

    But the photographs that started it all — elevating the home into the stuff of mythology — were taken by Julius Shulman. He was tapped to document the entire Arts & Architecture program after charting an unlikely career photographing modernist architecture in L.A., starting with those designed by Neutra.

    Shulman shot the Stahl House in May 1960, shortly after its completion. In the most iconic shot of the series, two young women in white party dresses are sitting in the glass living room, conversing leisurely as the house dissolves into the shimmering sprawl below.

    "It was not an architectural quote-unquote 'photograph,'" said Shulman about the image in an interview for the Archives of American Art. "It is a picture of a mood.”