Sustain LAist today!

Your monthly gift during our June member drive powers our local newsroom.
1,485 sustainers of 2,500 goal
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Bonta sues CHOC for ‘illegally’ restricting care
    Protesters on a street corner hold signs with slogans that include "Politicians should not make healthcare decisions," "Patients before politics" and "Trust doctors."
    Trans health care advocates staged a rally on Jan. 24, 2026 outside Children's Hospital of Orange County to protest its decision to stop some gender-affirming treatments.

    Topline:

    California Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed a lawsuit against the parent company of Children’s Hospital of Orange County for violating the terms of a recently signed merger agreement when it announced it had decided to cut off hormone therapy and other gender-affirming treatments.

    Why now: Bonta said Rady Children’s Health, the parent company of Children’s Hospital of Orange County and Rady Children’s Hospital in San Diego, guaranteed it would continue to offer the same level of gender-affirming care to youth in a 2024 merger agreement.

    The backstory: CHOC and Rady had announced late last month it would discontinue hormone treatments for its patients under 19, even those currently receiving these treatments, effective Feb. 6.

    Read on... for what else is in the lawsuit.

    California Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed a lawsuit against the parent company of Children’s Hospital of Orange County for violating the terms of a recently signed merger agreement when it decided to cut off hormone therapy and other gender-affirming treatments to about 1,500 patients.

    Last month, Rady Children’s Health announced the restrictions, which take effect Feb. 6. It pointed to recent federal actions in its decision.

    The healthcare system said that it would still offer hormone replacement therapy to patients 19 and older, according to a nonprofit that works with Rady's hospitals in San Diego and Orange. Rady Children's Health hospitals will also continue to see its trans patients 18 and under, though they won't offer hormones and surgeries to them.

    Bonta’s lawsuit, however, alleges the hospital system broke an agreement it had signed with his office just a year ago. That contract guaranteed that it would continue offering the same level of care to its patients through 2034 in many divisions of health care, including gender-affirming care.

    “Rady flagrantly disregarded its legal obligations by unilaterally deciding to preemptively comply with the Administration’s demands and cease medically necessary care for roughly 1,450 patients,” Bonta wrote in a statement.

    What the lawsuit says

    Bonta is seeking a permanent injunction that would require Rady to restore “all gender-affirming care services to the same types and levels of care as were provided at the time of Rady’s merger in January 2025” at CHOC. The injunction would also apply to Rady Children’s Hospital in San Diego, and its other hospitals and clinics across Southern California.

    Bonta also pointed to the long-term health effects and complications that would result from taking trans youth off of their prescribed hormone treatments, echoing concerns that medical professionals have shared with LAist.

    “Even brief interruptions in gender-affirming medical care can have a detrimental impact on a patient’s mental health and overall well-being,” the lawsuit states.

    Bonta also pointed to the short notice — just over two weeks — given to families, and said it left “hundreds of patients in medical limbo.”

    The father of a trans patient at Rady Children’s Health told LAist he found out from the San Diego-based nonprofit TransFamily Support Services that his son’s health care provider could no longer prescribe hormones. The father later found out that he'd been notified through a brief statement in a portal in his health care app, with no information about next steps. He said he was not otherwise contacted directly by the hospital.

    Bonta’s office declined to comment further on the lawsuit.

    What the hospital system is saying

    In a statement to LAist, Rady Children’s Health said it is “aware of the lawsuit filed by the California Attorney General and is reviewing the filing.”

    “That decision was guided by our responsibilities as a nonprofit pediatric healthcare system to continue serving all children and families across our communities, including through participation in essential federal programs,” Rady Children’s Health wrote.

    The hospital system said that it will address Bonta’s concerns “through the legal process.” A spokesperson did not respond when LAist asked directly if Rady Children's Health was undoing its previously announced restrictions.

    The hospital has pointed to recent federal actions, which include proposals aimed at restricting gender-affirming care for youth, as the reasoning behind its move. These federal rule changes are still going through a required 60-day comment period, which will end on February 17. The rules, even if they’re upheld by courts, may not take effect until later in the spring.

    What advocates for trans health are saying

    “They are clearly in violation of their contract. They're clearly in violation of the law,” Kathie Moehlig, founder and executive director of TransFamily Support Services, said. “We didn't see any action happen around [CHLA’s trans youth clinic] when it closed, other than a letter from the Attorney General, but actually taking a legal stance is good. Somebody’s standing up for our families.”

    Moehlig also pointed to the “slow drip” of actions taken by Rady Children’s Health to restrict access to its gender-affirming health care services, and noted that the state Attorney General’s office appears not to have been notified of any of them.

    TransFamily Support Services regularly works to connect families seeking gender-affirming health services with providers, including at CHOC and other Rady’s Health hospitals.

    Moehlig is also familiar with the health care system for another reason: Her son was the first patient treated at Rady Children’s Hospital’s gender-affirming care clinic in San Diego 14 years ago, well before the care began to become restricted in Republican-led states and nationally.

    The rare move from Bonta follows protests and blowback from the community in Southern California, as protests were held outside CHOC and Rady’s Children Hospital in San Diego.

    What this means

    Bonta’s lawsuit marks a new enforcement mechanism in the state’s tactics to protect gender-affirming care for youth.

    Up to this point, Bonta has not directly intervened with hospitals in closures and restrictions for trans youth health care through lawsuits, opting instead to sue the federal government while sending hospitals letters warning them of potential violations of state law.

    Many of the legal issues around gender-affirming care for youth, and whether the federal government's actions to restrict it are legal, have still yet to be settled. There are multiple ongoing and expected lawsuits to settle the issue of whether the federal HHS can act to restrict trans youth health care by outlawing the allocation of Medicare and Medicaid funds for healthcare providers that offer it.

    Many advocates have accused the federal government of overreach and using improper enforcement mechanisms to strong-arm hospitals into closing or limiting access to clinics for trans youth.

  • With days left, US opening match not sold out

    Topline:

    Something unusual is happening with only a few days remaining before the U.S. men's national team opens its World Cup campaign against Paraguay: Tickets for the match are not sold out.

    More details: Although numbers fluctuate regularly, FIFA's ticketing website still shows 132 tickets left to sell for a game that's set to take place in Los Angeles on Friday. Meanwhile, resale platforms such as StubHub and SeatGeek — and FIFA's own marketplace — also show thousands of tickets on sale.

    Why now: Ticketing experts widely agree on the reason: the prices. FIFA dramatically jacked them up for the tournament — especially for high profile games. The most expensive regular seats for the U.S. opener against Paraguay are priced at $2,735 — more than the final cost for the 2022 World Cup final — while the cheapest are $1,120.

    Read on... for more on the opening matches.

    Something unusual is happening with only a few days remaining before the U.S. men's national team opens its World Cup campaign against Paraguay: Tickets for the match are not sold out.

    Although numbers fluctuate regularly, FIFA's ticketing website still shows 132 tickets left to sell for a game that's set to take place in Los Angeles on Friday. Meanwhile, resale platforms such as StubHub and SeatGeek — and FIFA's own marketplace — also show thousands of tickets on sale.

    The number is even higher for Canada's opening match against Bosnia Herzegovina in Toronto on the same day, with 226 tickets left in FIFA's website and a high number of tickets available in resale markets.

    That's unusual for high-profile events such as the opening matches of the World Cup — traditionally among the hardest to get tickets in the tournament. This year will feature three hosts in the U.S., Canada and Mexico — but so far only Mexico's opening match against South Africa on Thursday looks to be virtually sold out.

    Ticketing experts widely agree on the reason: the prices. FIFA dramatically jacked them up for the tournament — especially for high profile games. The most expensive regular seats for the U.S. opener against Paraguay are priced at $2,735 — more than the final cost for the 2022 World Cup finalwhile the cheapest are $1,120.


    Even President Trump said he wouldn't pay those prices.

    "I would certainly like to be there, but I wouldn't pay it either, to be honest with you," Trump told the New York Post in a recent interview.

    The other two remaining games for the U.S. national have far fewer tickets available, given that prices are well below the ones for the opening match.

    Prices have also fallen sharply

    There are not only plenty of tickets left to sell — a number of them are also available below FIFA's face value. According to Ticketdata, which tracks prices across the resale platforms, the cheapest pair of tickets for the opening match for the U.S. and Canada was $951 as of Monday morning, while in FIFA's resale platform, tickets were available for as low as $690.

    Other games across the 104-match tournament also still have many tickets left to sell — despite FIFA President Gianni Infantino's claim that every match is "already sold out." That's especially the case for lesser well known teams such as the Jordan against Algeria match, which still had hundreds of unsold seats in the FIFA's web site.

    Demand for high-profile tickets such as Argentina and Portugal was far higher, however, with many of those games looking largely sold out.

    Will the opening matches sell out?

    Whether eventually the U.S. and Canada opening matches will sell out is hard to answer. Throughout the sales process, FIFA has closely guarded how many tickets it has actually sold and how many are left to sell, making it virtually impossible to gauge.

    In addition, like other teams, FIFA could also sell tickets in other platforms including third-party ones such as SeatGeek, which can further obscure how many tickets are left to sell.

    FIFA and organizers, however, are hoping for a surge in excitement that leads to a last-minute rush of sales for the opening matches as well as for those such as Jordan against Algeria that look far from being sold out.

    Ben Shields, a senior lecturer at the MIT Sloan School of Management, says perceptions so far of the tournament have been shaped by how expensive tickets and travel has been for a tournament taking place across an entire continent.

    That, he says, "does not seem to sit well with many."

    But that could change.

    "The hope or bet — for FIFA is that once the matches start — and the greatest players in the world compete for the most prestigious prize of them all, the sport as business lens will fade into the background and the World Cup will be seen and experienced as the enduring global institution that it is," Shields says. "We shall see."
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • OC supervisors expected to discuss Tuesday
    A man in a chair wearing a suit jacket, tie and glasses looks forward with a microphone in front of him. A sign in front has the official seal of the County of Orange and states "Andrew Do, Vice Chairman, District 1."
    Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do at the board of supervisors meeting on Nov. 28, 2023

    Topline:

    Orange County’s top elected leaders on Tuesday are set to discuss what to do with $3.7 million recovered from the Andrew Do corruption scheme.

    The backstory: Do is now serving a five-year sentence in federal prison after he admitted to accepting bribes in exchange for awarding millions in tax dollars meant to feed needy seniors and people with disabilities in his district. As part of the plea deal, Do acknowledged taking over $800,000 in bribes through his two daughters, including a down payment on the house his youngest daughter Rhiannon Do later forfeited to resolve the criminal case. The scheme was first uncovered by LAist.

    What they want: Ahead of Tuesday’s discussion, Do’s successor — Janet Nguyen — said the funds should support residents of his former district who were deprived by Do and his alleged co-conspirators. Other supervisors have advocated a broader view of how they’d want to use the money.

    Orange County’s top elected leaders on Tuesday are set to discuss what to do with $3.7 million recovered from the Andrew Do corruption scheme.

    Do is now serving a five-year sentence in federal prison after he admitted to accepting bribes in exchange for awarding millions in tax dollars meant to feed needy seniors and people with disabilities in his district.

    As part of the plea deal, Do acknowledged taking more than $800,000 in bribes through his two daughters, including a down payment on the house his youngest daughter Rhiannon Do later forfeited to resolve the criminal case. The scheme was first uncovered by LAist.

    Federal officials recovered money from seized bank accounts and two properties connected to Do’s scheme — including the Tustin house his daughter bought.

    The county Board of Supervisors is expected to publicly discuss plans for the recovered funds as they make decisions on the overall county budget at their meeting Tuesday. Public comment will also be taken.

    What to do with the money?

    Ahead of Tuesday’s discussion, Do’s successor said the funds should support residents of his former district who were deprived by Do and his alleged co-conspirators.

    “For the past five years, every other district in Orange County has benefitted from the same community funds to support their cities, nonprofits, civic projects which strengthens their communities,” Supervisor Janet Nguyen wrote in a mass email to constituents last week. “However, our district went without because Do stole what belonged to our residents.”

    “This money was stolen from the First District, and it must come back to the First District,” Nguyen added.

    Nguyen was Do’s mentor and former boss more than a decade ago, before the two had a bitter falling out by 2016.

    She encouraged residents of her district to send letters to the board and to speak during public comments.

    Several county supervisors told LAist they supported a similar approach, one in which the recovered money goes to support the original intended recipients: seniors and people with disabilities in Do’s former district. Some supervisors have since advocated a broader view of how they’d want to use the money, noting that it was meant to address disruptions caused by the pandemic. Now that years have passed since the initial COVID-19 outbreak and lockdowns, some supervisors argue community needs have changed.

    “We are so many years on, and the problems that money originally was to address (mostly Covid impacts) are now behind us, that I think we should have a discussion about how and where to spend it,” Supervisor Don Wagner told LAist via text message in March. “The budget is so tight and the needs so great across the county.”

    Supervisor Vicente Sarmiento said he’d work toward a fair distribution of the funds to best serve residents, with a focus on current needs.

    “We will definitely consider what areas of the County were harmed by Do’s scheme, but we must also remember that the funds were intended for relief efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic, a threat we are no longer facing,” he said in March. “We also need to consider addressing the current needs of residents with any dollars returned to the county.”

    Millions more haven’t been recovered, at least yet

    The amount of taxpayer money recovered so far is less than half of the $7.9 million Andrew Do admitted was diverted from specific meal contracts.

    In a lawsuit seeking to recover funds, the county alleges the total amount lost in the scheme was even larger: $13.25 million. The county’s suit — scheduled for trial in November 2027 — covers all of the money Do gave to two nonprofits accused in the scheme, Viet America Society and Hand to Hand Relief Organization.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is ngerda.47.

    That leaves more than $4 million — and possibly much more — not yet recovered.

    A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office noted they have an ongoing criminal case against Do’s alleged co-conspirator Peter Pham.

    “Assuming we obtain a conviction in that matter, we would expect to seek restitution,” the spokesperson, Ciaran McEvoy, said.

    Pham left the country on a flight to Taiwan in late 2024 and remains a fugitive, according to McEvoy. The case against him also includes charges against another alleged co-conspirator, Thanh Huong Nguyen, who led the Hand to Hand nonprofit.

  • Fans watch US men’s national team's practice
    A mother and daughter with medium skinned stand smiling. The daughter is wearing a stars and stripe head scarf. Behind them is a soccer field with players standing and sitting.
    The U.S. Men's National Team at their only open-to-the-public practice session in Irvine.

    Topline:

    More than 6,000 fans watched a U.S. Men's National Soccer Team practice Monday morning at their base camp at Great Park Sports Complex in Irvine. It's the only time the team will practice in public during the World Cup.

    Why it matters: For fans of the US Men's National Soccer Team, it's a rare chance to see them without an expensive ticket. Thousands signed up for a lottery, with many left disappointed.

    What's at stake: The U.S. men’s team is representing co-host country USA in this 2026 World Cup, a country that has millions of youth in soccer leagues nationwide but that is often bested in international play by much smaller countries.

    Why Irvine: The team will use the soccer field and stadium at the Great Park as their training facility during the team’s three group play matches at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood.

    The backstory: The U.S. men’s team has not made it to quarterfinals in the World Cup since 2002.

    What's next: The U.S. plays Paraguay on June 12, Australia on June 19, and Turkey on June 25 in group play at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood.

    Fans of the U.S. Men’s National Soccer Team swelled the stadium at the Great Park in Irvine on Monday to watch players practice for the first time since arriving at the training facility they’ll call home for the first round of the 2026 World Cup.

    “Seeing them play right now… it was really cool to see how they play and how they practice,” said Mila Ran, who came with her mother from nearby Mission Viejo.

    “This whole time she’s saying, 'I want to go shoot, I want to go play,'” said Mila’s mother, Farah Ran.

    They were among about 6,000 people who won free entry to the practice in a lottery that received more than 30,000 entries, according to Irvine officials.

    A light skinned teenage boy and a light skinned woman, both wearing Team USA T shirts, stand in line next to a green field.
    Fans got to the venue early.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
    /
    LAist
    )

    The team’s biggest stars — Christian Pulisic, Antonee Robinson and others — showed off their ball handling skills, honed over years of play on U.S. youth fields and overseas in professional leagues. Fans yelled, waved U.S. flags, held up homemade signs, and did the wave several times.

    Soccer players wearing a black uniform play soccer on a green pitch.
    The U.S. Men's National Team at their only open-to-the-public practice session in Irvine.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
    /
    LAist
    )

    After the roughly 45-minute practice, some players walked to the sidelines to take selfies with fans and sign autographs.

    The players know it’s going to take more than this, however, to live up to expectations during the World Cup.

    A light skinned man with blonde hair tied into a bun, wearing a soccer strip, kneels down to sign an autograph for a young boy with medium skin and dark hair. He's surrounded by other young boys wearing USA soccer shirts.
    US men's national team player Tim Ream signs an autograph for a fan.
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
    /
    LAist
    )

    “To be in a position to train in front of these people today… is such a unique opportunity and one that none of us take for granted,” said backup goalie Matt Freese before the practice. “We’re working as hard as we can, as focused as we can to leave the next generation inspired."

    The U.S. men’s team and their training staff will use the Great Park facility over the next several weeks as the team plays Paraguay on Friday, Australia on June 19, and Turkey on June 25 in group play at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood.

  • Accused of starting deadly Palisades Fire
    A distraught woman holds a bag while gesturing to a car as fire and smoke billow in the background.
    A woman cries as the Palisades Fire advances in Pacific Palisades on Jan. 7, 2025.

    Topline:

    Jury selection began Monday for the trial of the man accused of igniting a fire that led to the deadly and destructive Palisades Fire, which killed 12 people and destroyed thousands of structures.

    The charges: Jonathan Rinderknecht is charged with one count of destruction of property by means of fire, one count of arson affecting property used in interstate commerce and one count of setting timber afire. He could face up to 45 years in federal prison.

    How we got here: Prosecutors allege Rinderknecht set brush alight near a popular hiking trail in the Santa Monica Mountains on New Year’s Day, starting the Lachman Fire. Firefighters initially thought they put out the fire, but it remained smoldering underground for several days. High winds then brought the embers to the surface, sparking the Palisades Fire, which burned more than 23,000 acres.

    Jury selection began Monday for the trial of the man accused of igniting a fire that led to the deadly and destructive Palisades Fire, which killed 12 people and destroyed thousands of structures.

    Jonathan Rinderknecht is charged with one count of destruction of property by means of fire, one count of arson affecting property used in interstate commerce and one count of setting timber afire. He could face up to 45 years in federal prison.

    How we got here

    Prosecutors allege Rinderknecht set brush alight near a popular hiking trail in the Santa Monica Mountains on New Year’s Day, starting the Lachman Fire. Firefighters initially thought they put out the fire, but it remained smouldering underground for several days. High winds then brought the embers to the surface, sparking the Palisades Fire, which burned more than 23,000 acres.

    What prosecutors say

    In a court filing in April, prosecutors allege Rinderknecht displayed “extreme anger, indignation, and frustration” because he had to spend New Year's Eve alone. After driving around for Uber, Rinderknecht hiked up a popular trail and set chaparral alight in a clearing, according to prosecutors.

    “He then started calling 911 multiple times, hiked down the hill, and fled the area in his car before firefighters arrived. Defendant returned to the area after he saw fire trucks arriving and then took videos of the firefighting efforts,” prosecutors wrote.

    The filing also states that Rinderknecht threatened to burn down his sister’s home.

    Prosecutors are expected to argue that Rinderknecht started the smaller blaze knowing it could turn into a bigger inferno.

    U.S. District Court Judge Anne Hwang has previously expressed the government’s position could confuse jurors.

    What the defense says

    Defense attorney Steve Haney previously told reporters that prosecutors were trying to blame Rinderknecht for a fire that started days before the Palisades Fire.

    "Well what about what happened between Jan. 1 and Jan. 7?" he asked. "Jonathan wasn't out there with a fire hose putting that fire out at the Lachman location, the Fire Department was. So why are they blaming him for whatever the Fire Department didn't do?"