Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Now, you get to vote for your favorite
    An amazing looking cheese burger
    Yum. Cheeseburger. A Terrible Burger, Mahalo version, served at a pop-up outside Wine Country in Long Beach.

    Topline:

    We announced the LAist Tournament of Cheeseburgers a month ago and asked you to share your favorite cheeseburgers. And did you! We received thousands of entries. Today, we're releasing The Round of 32, who will be whittled down over the next few weeks to the Savory 16, the Tasty 8 and the Flavorful 4. The ultimate winner will be crowned on July 7 at Smorgasburg LA. This is your invitation to join us for this free event!

    Why it matters: You get to vote! These are the 32 most popular SoCal cheeseburgers nominated by you, the LAist audience. The list reveals the deep connection you have to the places you frequent, and how they're part of your lives.

    Why now: We have the entries — now we need you to vote! Starting today, you'll have the chance to push your favorite cheeseburger into the Savory 16 round. Voting closes on Thursday May 30 at 1 p.m.

    The backstory: We're celebrating the 100th anniversary of the cheeseburger, an iconic American favorite with close ties to SoCal. According to local lore, the cheeseburger was invented right here in Pasadena at a drive-up roadside stand. (A sidewalk plaque on Colorado Boulevard in Pasadena commemorates this magical moment.) To honor that entrepreneurial spirit, we decided to crown the best cheeseburger in Southern California — with your help.

    What's next: You vote! Head to LAist.com/burgervote, and while you're at it, get your friends, family members, neighbors, and co-workers to vote, too. And plan to join us at Smorgasburg LA, on July 7.

    We asked you to share your favorite cheeseburgers in L.A., and you answered in droves!

    As of this week, we've received almost 4,000 entries for the LAist Tournament of Cheeseburgers, our competition to crown the favorite cheeseburger in the land.

    Now we’re unveiling the Burger Round of 32 — see below — and opening voting for the next round.

    Here’s how it will work

    Starting today (Friday), you can vote for your favorite cheeseburger eateries among the Burger Round of 32.

    Those votes will determine who makes it to the Savory 16 round, which will be announced on Friday May 31.

    Then, a new round of voting will begin. Each week your votes will whittle the list down two more times, to the Savory 8 and then the Flavorful 4.

    So get voting — and get your friends, family, neighbors, and co-workers to vote, too. Remember, each person can only vote once.

    It will all come to a head at a free event on Sunday, July 7, at Smorgasburg LA, when the top vote-getter will be crowned.

    Check out the entries

    We couldn’t be more proud of this list, which embraces the greatness of our SoCal food scene.

    You shared the juiciest, meatiest, and cheesiest burgers as your favorites — from smash burgers with the thinnest crispy, lacy edges to thick bistro burgers found in dive bars, pop-ups, beachside locales, and beyond. Your entries reflected it all.

    The representation of the many neighborhoods and cities on the list also reflects the true diversity of the Tournament of Cheeseburgers, which feels distinctly LAist.

    It'll be amazing to see burger businesses from the Valley, South Bay, O.C., and L.A. all grilling their hearts out next to each other this summer at Smorgasborg LA.

    So without further ado, here are your most popular burgers, in alphabetical order. (We want to keep things fair).

    The voting page also randomizes the order every time the page loads, so there's always a different eatery at the top of the list.

    Introducing the Burger Round of 32

  • Listeners argue whether dogs belong in restaurants
    dog-restaurant-cali.jpg
    L.A. County's public health policy forbids dogs inside restaurants.

    Look: I like dogs. I just don't like when they're inside restaurants or other places where food is served. Lately, I've seen a lot of people casually bringing their pups into restaurants, and it's been grossing me out.

    But: That's just my opinion. L.A. County's public health policy forbids dogs inside restaurants, but that doesn't seem to be stopping anyone. On a recent episode of AirTalk, we heard from listeners about what they thought about bringing dogs in restaurants.

    Listen: To the AirTalk episode below to hear what listeners thought, and email me at nperez@laist.com if you want to fight.

    Listen 17:47
    AirTalk: Do dogs belong in restaurants?

  • Sponsored message
  • LAUSD ridership expands as fleet goes electric
    A yellow bus with a green fender. Black letters above the windshield read "SCHOOL BUS."
    LAUSD's bus fleet now includes 250 electric buses. The vehicles cost about $420,000 each and are funded largely by state and federal dollars, said Daniel Kang, LAUSD's transportation director.

    Topline:

    The number of Los Angeles Unified students regularly taking the bus to school has increased by about 10% over the last two years, a change prompted in part by families concerned about federal immigration enforcement. On Thursday, district leaders said buses have room for even more riders.

    The backstory: During the last school year, an average of 16,800 students rode the bus each day, up from 15,300 students in the 2023-2024 school year. Federal law requires schools to provide transportation for some students with disabilities. The district also prioritizes students in specific academic programs and those with concerns about safety.

    What’s new this school year? Nearly three-quarters of the district’s 1,300 buses now run on alternative fuel, including a record-high 250 electric vehicles, according to Daniel Kang, LAUSD’s transportation director. The vast majority of the fleet now has Wi-Fi and technology that allows families to track their students’ bus in real time.

    “A student's ability to arrive to school safely and reliably should never depend on a family's income, where they live, or whether they have access to a car,” said Board Vice President Rocío Rivas.

    ICE raids led to more riders: There have been several instances of students and parents being detained near Southern California schools since the Trump administration stripped campuses of immigration enforcement protections in 2025.

    Last school year, the district provided rides to about 1,000 students whose families worried about immigration enforcement, Kang said Thursday.

    Request a ride: Any family can request a bus ride, but the district sets routes based on demand. The Parent Portal app is the best way to request a ride, Kang said. Parents can also ask school staff, including the principal, or counselors, or call the district’s resource hotline at (213)-443-1300.

  • Move to deregulate the early ed program

    Topline:

    The Trump administration on Thursday proposed significant changes to Head Start, the nation's early education program for children from low-income families. The move would diminish the program's federal standards and give states and parents more control.


    About Head Start: The program not only provides preschool and childcare, but also meals and support services for qualifying families. It now serves more than 700,000 kids each year from birth to age 5. Since its launch in 1965, the $12 billion HHS program has, for the most part, enjoyed bipartisan support. But in recent years, some conservatives have criticized Head Start, saying it wastes money and fails to have a lasting impact on students.
    Why are changes being made?: The new proposal would limit the amount of money Head Start centers can spend on administrative overhead, from a 15% cap to 5%. This change should save the government $2.2 billion, which it plans to reinvest in the program. To get those costs down, the administration said it proposes cutting regulations and "compliance-driven activities," according to a press release. Similarly, they are shifting decisions about several standards — such as student-teacher ratios, education requirements, background checks and transportation practices — back to states.

    The Trump administration on Thursday proposed significant changes to Head Start, the nation's early education program for children from low-income families. The move would diminish the program's federal standards and give states and parents more control.

    "We have 1,600 Head Start providers across the country," Alex Adams, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services' assistant secretary for family support, said in a call with reporters. "And one-size-fits-all mandates from Washington cannot fully account for the realities facing these 1,600 grantees."

    Head Start not only provides preschool and childcare, but also meals and support services for qualifying families. It now serves more than 700,000 kids each year from birth to age 5.

    Since its launch in 1965, the $12 billion HHS program has, for the most part, enjoyed bipartisan support. Lawmakers often cite it as a success — including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during the call with reporters announcing these changes. But in recent years, some conservatives have criticized Head Start, saying it wastes money and fails to have a lasting impact on students.

    Aiming to cut costs

    The new proposal would limit the amount of money Head Start centers can spend on administrative overhead, from a 15% cap to 5%. This change should save the government $2.2 billion, Adams said, which it plans to reinvest in the program. The goal is to create 200,000 more spots for children, he said.

    To get those costs down, the administration said it proposes cutting regulations and "compliance-driven activities," according to a press release. Similarly, they are shifting decisions about several standards — such as student-teacher ratios, education requirements, background checks and transportation practices — back to states.

    Childcare providers are not sold on the proposal.

    "If we look at the previous actions of the administration, what they have done is not in favor of expanding the program," said Yvette Sanchez Fuentes, senior vice president with Start Early, an Illinois-based Head Start partner.

    "Is it enough to just bring kids in the door if we're not actually giving kids and families what they need?"

    Sanchez Fuentes said administrative costs are not only things like payroll and day-to-day operations, but also help fill gaps in care. "If you, for example, have children with disabilities you [can use] some of those funds to pay for additional special services or staff with specialties who could come in and support kids."

    The administration's proposal also says parents are children's primary teachers and seeks to bring in more parent opinions on "structure and curriculum" into the classrooms and emphasizes nutrition and exercise.

    Loosening the standards

    Head Start's current standards are laid out in a detailed 133-page guide. The manual is used not only by the program's centers, but also by many unaffiliated private childcare centers across the country.

    These standards include safety guidelines, spell out who is eligible for Head Start and provide detailed rules — such as the requirement that kids in the program brush their teeth once daily with fluoride toothpaste.

    Erica Phillips, the executive director for the National Association for Family Child Care, said about 10% of her members are Early Head Start childcare partners, while the rest are home-based providers around the country.

    "The Head Start performance standards were a consistent … evidence-based set of standards," she said. "It can be helpful to have a nationally recognized benchmark."

    Phillips said her organization will be on the lookout for variations across states. She said she worries "quality is now dependent on your ZIP code or on your geography."

    The Trump administration sees it differently.

    "Flexibility is permission. It's not a mandate," Adams said. "The opportunity for these programs to make a different decision does not necessarily mean they must make a different decision."

    The changes did not come as a complete surprise: The conservative Heritage Foundation has long criticized the program, saying it "doesn't work." In Project 2025, the foundation's policy blueprint that the Trump administration has taken many cues from, the message is clear — eliminate Head Start.

    Advocates see what they characterize as the erosion of quality and decrease in standards as the first step in dismantling the program.

    A long runway

    Thursday's announcement came in the form of a notice of proposed rulemaking, or NPRM. It kicks off a lengthy, formalized process of public comment and talks with stakeholders. It could be six months to a year before any new standards take effect.

    "I just really want folks to know Head Start is open," said Tommy Sheridan, deputy director at the National Head Start Association (NHSA), a nonprofit that advocates for the program. "The quality of Head Start children and families truly comes from the people that are running Head Start programs. Those folks are going to be the same. They're going to be able to do that."

    The administration says the NPRM will be published in the Federal Register on Friday and be open to public comment for 60 days.

    Edited by: Natalie Escobar
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Kids are struggling to gain access to meals
    A recent report from Feeding America shows that food insecurity increased year over year between 2022 and 2024.

    Topline:

    More children in Orange County experienced food insecurity in 2024 compared to the previous year, according to a new report from Feeding America.

    What we know: About 1 in 8 O.C. residents experienced food insecurity in 2024 — up 6% from 2023. And 27% more children were food insecure.

    Is this new? Previous reports show an upward trend in Orange County’s food insecurity.

    Read on … for what experts say could be causing the increase in hunger.

    A recent report from Feeding America shows food insecurity increased year over year between 2022 and 2024. Advocates say today’s reality could be much worse.

    The report published last week showed that about 1 in 6 kids in Orange County experienced food insecurity in 2024 — that’s up 27% from the year before.

    For some advocates, the report published last week was not surprising.

    “With the SNAP benefits being reduced and the persistent inflation, particularly food inflation and energy inflation, and the lack of wages keeping up, something's got to give,” LaVal Brewer, president and CEO at South County Outreach, said.

    Experts say the snapshot of food insecurity in Orange County could tell us more about today’s needs.

    Who else did the report capture? 

    Overall, 1 in 8 O.C. residents were food insecure in 2024 — up 6% from the year before.

    The problem also disproportionately affected communities of color. According to the report, 29% of Black residents and 18% of Latinos in Orange County experienced food insecurity.

    Nearly half of people experiencing food insecurity have incomes too high to qualify for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

    What does it mean to be food insecure? 

    Food insecurity is not knowing where your next meal will come from. A lot of factors can lead to this, like low or inconsistent income, access to nutritious foods and the cost of living.

    Claudia Bonilla Keller, CEO of Second Harvest Food Bank, told LAist some people might not doubt that they’ll have access to food, but they might not know what they’re having for breakfast, lunch or dinner.

    What does this report tell us about today? 

    The findings from this report were recorded in 2024, before the federal government made changes to food programs, like SNAP. Experts say food insecurity today is likely much worse and worsening.

    “Since the sunsetting of the COVID-era benefits, the onset of inflation and the high price of fuel, and now changes to the safety net, what we've seen is a constant downward,” Keller said.

    The report is compiled annually using data from national survey responses, local unemployment rates, and median incomes across all U.S. counties.

    What to know about hunger 

    Keller said food insecurity ebbs and flows throughout the year, but spikes in the summer.

    “But for families with children, we know that it spikes in the summer, also at the end of the year, for the long holiday breaks when students lose access to federally reimbursed meals,” Keller said. “Those meals can be two, even three, that families depend on to feed their kids.”

    Bill Bracken is the founder and executive director of Bracken’s Kitchen — a nonprofit that specializes in food rescue, culinary training and feeding the community.

    In the summer, he said, children suffer the most, and the same can be said for some college students.

    “We just happened to walk past a student who saw our logo on our uniforms and stopped and thanked us so much because he recognized the logo from the meals he gets from the (UCI) Food Hub,” Bracken said. “He's so grateful and just happy that we're able to provide something that he can pop in the microwave and eat right away.”

    Nevertheless, like hunger, food waste is also at an all-time high.

    “That's the sad part,” Bracken told LAist. “With all the need, we're still wasting more food than ever before. We're going to rescue more food this year than we ever have, and we'll produce more meals than we ever have.”

    When information is collected again, Brewer said, the numbers will be significantly worse, especially for those who no longer qualify for food benefits.

    “Those people who were not spending money on food because they were receiving a benefit from the federal government, from our tax dollars, no longer have that support,” Brewer said. “It's not like those people just suddenly earned more money to be able to cover their food costs.”

    Rent, mortgage, car notes, and child care are non-negotiables, Brewer added, “so you're going to be food insecure because that's something you can actually manage and control.”

    Food resources in Orange County