Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Diners line up to get one last taste before 5 p.m.
    People stand in line under a mural reading: Original Pantry Cafe
    The line outside The Original Pantry Cafe on its last day

    Topline:

    Beloved Los Angeles restaurant The Original Pantry Cafe closes today at 5 p.m. after more than 100 years in operation. Hundreds of Angelenos lined up before dawn to get one last taste.

    Why now: The restaurant was owned for decades by former Los Angeles mayor Richard Riordan who died n 2023. Ownership of the restaurant then fell to his administrative trust, which began exploring a sale of the restaurant.

    The backstory: The restaurant opened in 1924 and has amassed many loyal customers over the decades. Several generations of Angelenos have both eaten and worked at the diner over the years. The restaurant is known for its comfort breakfast food and operated 24/7 for many years.

    What's next: Workers at the restaurant are unionized under UNITE HERE Local 11 and have been attempting to negotiate a new contract with the current owners that would guarantee worker protections in the case of new ownership, but a new contract never materialized.

    The Original Pantry Cafe at the corner of 9th and Figueroa streets in downtown L.A first served plates of classic American breakfast in 1924, cultivating a loyal multi-generational base of regulars. More than a hundred years later, the diner is closing down.

    Former L.A. Mayor Richard Riordan bought the restaurant in 1981. After his death, his administrative trust took over ownership, which also oversees the charitable nonprofit Riordan Foundation.

    In a statement to LAist’s media partner KCAL News, the Richard J. Riordan Administrative Trust says selling the restaurant will better fund the foundation’s education work for low-income students.

    Listen 1:28
    The Original Pantry Cafe is set to close. We paid it a visit
    The greasy spoon has legion of fans who waited around the block to bid farewell.

    Riordan operated the restaurant as a passion project, and the Foundation says it was never profitable:

    “The trustees of the Mayor’s estate have determined that closing The Pantry and selling the property upon which it is located is the best path to provide the Foundation with the most financial resources to continue its wonderful charitable mission.”

    End of an era

    Fans of the Pantry have flocked to the greasy spoon for days knowing that it’s closing down. Sunday morning, the mood was bittersweet. A line stretched down the entire block of James M. Wood Boulevard and wrapped around until Francisco Street.

    Word on the line: The wait on this final day of business would be three hours.

    Josephine Garza came from Montebello, making it on the line by 10 a.m. Garza said when learned about the closure from the news, she made plans for one last meal.

    “If it’s the last day I’ve got to eat that bread. I love the bread,” she said. “It’s delicious.”

    Patrons waiting to go in chatted with each other about the iconic food and the memories they had dining at the restaurant over the years.

    For Dolores Rivoli of El Sereno, The Pantry was where she and her late husband went often with the family. She planned to honor him by ordering his favorite meal.

    “He loved the ham steak, the potatoes, the sourdough bread and the delicious pancakes, and of course no one could make coffee like them…He would be here,” Rivoli said.

    Inside the restaurant diners savored meals, drowning food in ketchup and syrup and leaving extra large tips on their tables. Many gave a tap on the shoulder of waiters they’ve known their whole lives, for what is likely the last time.

    They were full of joy and sorrow, and many seemed just happy they got a table at all. The crowd was expected to be nonstop until closing time at 5 p.m.

    Ronnie Medina of Norwalk enjoyed a plate of pancakes and said this meal was just one of many special occasions he’s had at The Pantry.

    “Special moments with my dad at the counter. I shared those same moments with my son,” Medina said. One time he was eating with his son, and realized they had the same waiter who'd served him when he was a little boy some 40 years ago.

    “I asked him, ‘How could that be?’ and he said, ‘Because I’ve never missed a day. And if you came and sat at the counter on a weekday at this time, it was me,’” Medina said.

    Labor negotiations

    Brenda De La Rosa was the lone cashier working Sunday. She’d been at The Pantry for just over a year, but her mother — a decades-long server — had been bringing her here since she was a child.

    She said she’s not sure what she and her mom will do next. “We’re all sad. They gave us a three-week notice,” De La Rosa said. “We’re still gonna protest and try to fight. Customers here are sad, they have many memories.”

    UNITE HERE Local 11, the union representing workers at The Pantry, sought to renegotiate their contract to safeguard work protections in the case of new ownership — but to no avail.

    So by shift's end, it was the end of a chapter for a local institution.

    “Today's our last day. We're hoping [for] a miracle or something, you know,” said  Maricela Granados, who has been working at the Pantry for 26 years. “Thank you for all the loyal customers that we have and everybody's trying to support.”

  • Curren Price Jr. faces corruption charges
    curren_price5.jpg
    Curren Price. (Photo by Jonathan Leibson/Getty Images)

    Topline

    Los Angeles City Councilmember Curren Price Jr. was ordered to stand trial on corruption charges Wednesday.

    The details: Superior Court Judge Shelly Torrealba made the decision after a six-day preliminary hearing where prosecutors presented a wide range of evidence against Price, including documents showing he voted to support projects that benefitted his wife’s business.

    The charges: Price, who is 75, faces 12 felony counts, including five counts of grand theft by embezzlement of public funds, four counts of conflict of interest and three counts of perjury by declaration. If convicted on all charges, he faces up to 11 years behind bars.

    Price attorney: “We’re obviously disappointed,” said Price defense attorney Michael Schafler. “We are going to continue to fight.” Price has pleaded not guilty.

    Los Angeles City Councilmember Curren Price Jr. was ordered to stand trial on corruption charges Wednesday.

    Superior Court Judge Shelly Torrealba made the decision after a six-day preliminary hearing where prosecutors presented a wide range of evidence against the 75-year-old Price, including documents showing he voted to support projects that benefitted his wife’s business.

    Price faces 12 felony counts: five counts of grand theft by embezzlement of public funds, four counts of conflict of interest and three counts of perjury by declaration.

    If convicted on all charges, he faces up to 11 years behind bars.

    “I’m glad that we were able to put on the evidence and the judge heard it and we get to move forward,” said Deputy District Attorney Casey Higgins, who presented the case.

    Price has pleaded not guilty.

    “We’re obviously disappointed,” said Price defense attorney Michael Schafler. “We are going to continue to fight.”

    Price declined to comment after the hearing.

    Conflict of interest charges

    Price, who represents a large swath of South L.A., is termed out of office at the end of the year. He is a veteran L.A. politician who has served in the state senate and assembly and on the Inglewood City Council.

    The conflict of interest charges relate to Price’s failure to recuse himself on votes involving projects in which his wife benefitted, according to prosecutors. Delbra Price Richardson provides relocation services and community engagement on big projects.

    During the hearing, prosecutors presented evidence that the city’s Housing Authority and LA Metro paid Price’s wife more than $800,000 at the same time Price voted to award the agency's multimillion-dollar contracts.

    Prosecutors also presented evidence that Del Richardson & Associates, a company owned solely by Price’s wife, received payments totaling more than $150,000 between 2019 and 2021 from developers before he voted to approve their projects.

    Former Price staffers testified about their system for flagging projects where there was a conflict of interest. But they conceded some projects slipped through the cracks.

    Schafler said Price didn’t know about the conflicts at the time.

    “There is no evidence Mr. Price knew of conflicts or that he acted with any wrongful intent,” the defense attorney said. “Prosecutors presented no evidence of Price's state of mind.”

    He also noted the projects “overwhelmingly” passed the City Council and that Price’s vote made no difference.

    Higgins, the deputy district attorney, argued it was ultimately Price’s responsibility to recuse himself from voting on projects involving his wife. The prosecutor told the judge Price tried to “create a wall around himself” with staffers who would give him “plausible deniability.”

    The perjury charges relate to Price allegedly failing to include Richardson’s income on disclosure forms. Schafler said the statute of limitations had run out on the charge.

    Price is also accused of embezzling approximately $33,800 in city funds from 2013-2017 to pay for medical benefits for Richardson, whom he falsely claimed was his wife while still legally married to Lynn Suzette Price.

    “He's nickel and diming the government at every turn,” Higgins told the court.

    “Your honor, this is not the kind of case with strippers and hookers and bags of cash and cocaine,” he said. “It's a long secret corruption.”

    Statement from Price’s office

    After the judge’s decision, Price’s spokesperson Angelina Valencia-Dumarot issued a statement.

    “The testimony presented during the hearing, including from key witnesses, clearly shows that Councilman Price did not act with any intent to do wrong and that the case rests on speculation rather than facts. While the court’s ruling is disappointing, the Councilmember remains fully committed to fighting these charges, clearing his name, and is confident the truth will ultimately prevail.”

    No trial date has been set. The next court date is March 13.

  • Sponsored message
  • Thousands call 211 hotline but resources are few
    A man in a wheelchair is tucked next to the side of a building, seeking shelter from rain falling on the city in front of him. A few people can be seen walking down the sidewalk with umbrellas and rain coats.
    A man finds a dry spot in downtown Los Angeles as another storm passed through on Saturday, Jan. 3, 2026.

    Topline:

    As a series of winter storms barreled toward Southern California around the start of the new year, the 211 LA hotline prepared to hand out motel vouchers and reserve shelter beds for people seeking refuge from wet weather.

    Why now: The hotline received more than 12,700 calls for assistance between Dec. 22 and Jan. 6 when the Emergency Response Program was activated in response to the severe weather.

    But it had just 140 motel vouchers to distribute — 50 from the city of Los Angeles and 90 from the county.

    What officials say: “A lot of the responses that we get from callers is anger … about not being able to provide them with that resource that they were told they can call us for,” Nancy Dueñez Velazquez, 211 LA’s housing director, told LAist.

    Read on ... Unhoused People Who Call 211 For Emergency Winter Shelter Should Expect Long Wait Times, If They Can Get Through At All

    As a series of winter storms barreled toward Southern California around the start of the new year, the 211 LA hotline prepared to hand out motel vouchers and reserve shelter beds for people seeking refuge from wet weather.

    The hotline received more than 12,700 calls for assistance between Dec. 22 and Jan. 6, when the Emergency Response Program was activated in response to the severe weather.

    But it had only 140 motel vouchers to distribute — 50 from the city of Los Angeles and 90 from the county. All vouchers were handed out within a day, according to the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, known as LAHSA, which helps distribute funding.

    Only one shelter in the program, in Long Beach, was open at that time and it was full during the two-week activation period, according to LAHSA. Another winter shelter program offers 335 beds but was mostly full at the time, officials said.

    The situation highlights long-running challenges 211 LA has faced during weather emergencies, including inadequate staff and long wait times. Officials say hotline callers are often frustrated when they find out that so few resources are available.

    “A lot of the responses that we get from callers is anger … about not being able to provide them with that resource that they were told they can call us for,” Nancy Dueñez Velazquez, 211 LA’s housing director, told LAist.

    She noted that when city and county officials encourage people to call 211 LA for shelter during a storm, they often don’t make clear that resources are "extremely limited.”

    County supervisors say they’re working to address 211’s challenges, but there are budget constraints. The county is considering major cuts to homeless services and programs in the next budget year as it faces increased costs and funding losses.

    Other county officials say they’re working to improve messaging around 211 and are shifting more funding through LAHSA to boost staffing.

    Supervisor Janice Hahn told LAist she wants the county to look into providing more shelter beds during storms.

    “In an emergency when lives are on the line, we have to be able to do better,” Hahn said.

    LAist reached out to several authorities in the city of L.A., including Mayor Karen Bass, but none responded by the time of publication.

    Thousands of calls; limited resources

    Southern California experienced historic rainfall in late December — Christmas Eve and Christmas Day were the wettest on record — followed by more rain in early January.

    During that time, the 211 hotline received 12,784 calls for assistance, Dueñez Velazquez said. But it didn’t have enough staff to handle them all.

    The hotline had funding for 17 agents, working around the clock, who were able to field about three quarters of those calls. The rest disconnected before reaching an agent. Ideally, the hotline needs nearly 60 agents to handle the call load, according to 211 LA estimates.

    Officials said they can boost staffing during emergencies by paying staff overtime. During the recent storms, 211 LA added about 58 hours of overtime, officials said.

    Fewer staff can mean people wait longer to get connected to an agent for assistance. The average wait time for people calling during the storms was a little under eight minutes.

    The longest wait time happened on Dec. 23, a day before Gov. Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency in L.A. and five other counties because of the weather. Some 211 callers waited two hours to reach an agent.

    Long wait times are not new to 211. In February 2024, as an atmospheric river was pummeling the region, LAist called the hotline and waited three hours and 30 minutes before reaching an agent. That was a little longer than the average wait for most callers that day, officials said at the time.

    Officials from 211 LA have communicated those challenges in multiple after-action reports, most recently in June 2025. The reports highlight strained capacity, extensive wait times, frustrated callers and delayed funding.

    Dueñez Velazquez said 211 LA has the ability to respond quickly to emergency events and assist people in need, it just needs the resources and budget to support the work. On a typical day, the hotline is “able to handle the call volume,” she said, but callers’ needs fluctuate with the weather.

    Resources can run out quickly, so 211 LA provides whatever assistance is available at the time of the call, Dueñez Velazquez said.

    “Whether that's a motel voucher, whether that's placement in a winter shelter site or whether that's information and referral to the next possible best resource that we can connect you to,” she said. “We really are here to help.”

    She added that 211 LA updates its website with information about the number of available motel vouchers so callers with access to the site can decide whether to stay on the line.

    LAHSA officials said the agency's goal is to serve as many unhoused people as possible each winter, and they’re proud to have “maximized resources” during the latest emergency.

    “We would welcome additional resources, but we understand there are several competing priorities,” Ahmad Chapman, LAHSA’s director of communications, told LAist.

    County officials respond

    L.A. County officials say they’re working to fix some of the problems facing 211.

    Supervisor Hilda Solis, chair of the Board of Supervisors, told LAist her office is improving public messaging so people calling 211 get the most up-to-date information on how many vouchers and other emergency resources are available.

    “Extreme weather events highlight both the importance and the limits of motel vouchers,” Solis said. “While they are an essential emergency tool during storms, they are resource-intensive and difficult to scale quickly enough to meet the full level of need.”

    Measure A, a half-cent sales tax increase passed by voters in 2024, directs funding to 211 LA to help ramp up capacity during the winter shelter season, Solis said. Cities can use their Measure A dollars to help add emergency shelters beds and motel vouchers to the overall inventory.

    Supervisor Kathryn Barger told LAist the county’s new Department of Homeless Services and Housing is focused on making the most of limited resources while working with LAHSA on outreach.

    “While emergency shelters are one critical tool, they are not the only option — motel vouchers and other interventions are also part of the County’s response — but all of this is constrained by fiscal realities,” Barger said. “That’s why we continue to look for ways to better coordinate, communicate, and stretch resources as effectively as possible.”

    Officials with the Department of Homeless Services and Housing told LAist that more emergency shelter units were available during the winter storms, nearly half of which were allocated to 211 LA.

    The department said in a statement to LAist it connects with people experiencing homelessness to make sure they’re aware of incoming storms, moves them out of areas prone to flooding and provides temporary shelter for as many as possible. Outreach teams also have their own motel vouchers to hand out, according to officials, in addition to 211 LA.

    “[The department] has taken steps to support 211 in addressing an influx of callers seeking support during inclement weather, including shifting funding through LAHSA to pay for around-the-clock staffing to meet urgent needs,” the statement read.

    Officials with the city of L.A. have expressed concerns about the region's storm response in the past.

    Councilmember Nithya Raman has said previously that her office struggled to get people seeking shelter into temporary rooms during winter storms in 2024, and that there needed to be better lines of communication between LAHSA, 211 and the city.

    Raman, chair of the Housing and Homelessness Committee, and Councilmember Ysabel Jurado, vice-chair of the committee, didn’t respond to LAist’s questions about the recent storm response.

    Mayor Karen Bass’ office did not respond to LAist’s request for comment.

  • Sending National Guard to cities could cost $1B

    Topline:

    President Donald Trump's unprecedented use of the National Guard could cost $1.1 billion this year if domestic deployments remain in place, according to data released by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

    Seven months of deployment: During his second term, Trump sent troops to six Democratic-led cities in an effort to suppress protests, tackle crime or protect federal buildings and personnel, beginning with Los Angeles. Half of those mobilizations ended this month, namely in Los Angeles, Chicago and Portland, Ore. But the continued military presence in Washington, D.C., Memphis and New Orleans, along with 200 members of the Texas National Guard still on standby, is expected to carry a steep cost.

    The numbers: The CBO said that at current levels, these deployments will require an additional $93 million per month. The operation in D.C. alone, which currently includes over 2,690 Guard members, is projected to reach upwards of $660 million this year if it runs through December as expected by the CBO. National Guard deployment to Los Angeles cost $193 million.

    President Donald Trump's unprecedented use of the National Guard could cost $1.1 billion this year if domestic deployments remain in place, according to data released by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

    During his second term, Trump sent troops to six Democratic-led cities in an effort to suppress protests, tackle crime or protect federal buildings and personnel. Half of those mobilizations ended this month, namely in Los Angeles, Chicago and Portland, Ore. But the continued military presence in Washington, D.C., Memphis and New Orleans, along with 200 members of the Texas National Guard still on standby, is expected to carry a steep cost.

    On Wednesday, the CBO said that at current levels, these deployments will require an additional $93 million per month. The operation in D.C. alone, which currently includes over 2,690 Guard members, is projected to reach upwards of $660 million this year if it runs through December as expected by the CBO.

    The CBO's findings were issued in response to 11 U.S. senators — led by Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon — who, back in October, urged the budget office to conduct an independent probe into deployment costs.

    "It's a massive use of national treasure that should be going into healthcare, housing and education," Merkley told NPR on Wednesday.

    The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

    For months, the Trump administration has offered little information about the price tag associated with the Guard operations. The CBO's findings on Wednesday come as Trump's use of National Guard troops has already faced legal scrutiny in the courts and sparked serious conversations about soldiers' morale.

    In 2025, $496 million spent on domestic deployments 

    Trump first deployed the Guard in June to Los Angeles in response to protests over immigration raids. In the months that followed, the president ordered troops to D.C. and Memphis, arguing that they were needed to crack down on crime. Guard forces were also mobilized to Chicago and Portland, Ore., after the administration said they were needed to protect federal buildings and personnel, though they were blocked by federal courts from conducting operations. Most recently, at the end of December, troops arrived in New Orleans after Republican Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry requested federal assistance to improve public safety.

    According to the CBO, these mobilizations cost about $496 million in 2025. That total includes:

    • $193 million in Los Angeles 
    • $223 million in D.C.
    • $33 million in Memphis
    • $26 million in Portland, Ore.
    • $21 million in Chicago


    The cost for a single service member — which includes pay, health care, lodging, food and transportation — ranges from $311 to $607 per day, the budget office said.

    At large, the nation's defense budget will surpass $1 trillion for the first time in U.S. history as a result of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. But Gabe Murphy, a policy analyst from the nonpartisan budget watchdog Taxpayers for Common Sense, said the deployments' multimillion-dollar price tag shouldn't be overlooked.

    " No one wants to see their tax dollars wasted," he said.

    Murphy argued that using federalized Guard members to tackle crime, like in D.C. and Memphis, is not cost-effective since they are not allowed to conduct actual law enforcement duties, such as performing arrests or searches. He added that deploying the Guard is not a long-term solution to reducing crime.

    "It would be far more cost effective to invest in local law enforcement," he said.

    Trump has repeatedly defended the use of troops, asserting that cities with a Guard presence have become safer.

    "Can't imagine why governors wouldn't want us to help," Trump said at a press conference on Jan. 3.

    If Trump orders more deployments, it could cost up to $21 million per 1,000 soldiers

    Earlier this month, the Trump administration withdrew the Guard from California, Oregon and Illinois after the Supreme Court refused to allow troops into Chicago, at least for the time being.

    Despite the setback, Trump has continued to suggest using military force domestically. Most recently, he threatened to activate troops via the Insurrection Act to quell protests in Minneapolis following the shooting of Renee Macklin Good by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent.

    To support additional Guard deployments, the CBO estimates that it could cost between $18 million and $21 million for every additional 1,000 soldiers.

    Lindsay Koshgarian, the program director of the National Priorities Project who has been tracking deployment costs, worries that at some point, these expenses will affect funding for other important military priorities. The NPP is a research group within the progressive think tank, the Institute for Policy Studies.

    A cautionary tale comes from 2021. After some 25,000 Guard forces were sent to D.C. in the wake of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, the Army National Guard warned that the money used for that deployment had diverted funds away from military training and readiness. Congress later approved $521 million to reimburse the Guard.

    "At some point, this is going to either take away from other things that people want and need or it's probably going to have to be funded with additional money," she said.
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Bruce Springsteen's 'Streets of Minneapolis'

    Topline:

    On Wednesday, Bruce Springsteen released a protest song condemning the violence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in Minneapolis. The song memorializes the lives of Renee Macklin Good and Alex Pretti, who were fatally shot by federal agents this month.

    "Streets of Minneapolis": Springsteen wrote on social media that the song is "in response to the state terror being visited on the city of Minneapolis. It's dedicated to the people of Minneapolis, our innocent immigrant neighbors and in memory of Alex Pretti and Renee Good. Stay free." It's a full-band rock and roll song, complete with an E Street Choir singalong.

    Calling out Trump: Springsteen's raw and raspy voice is full of indignation as he calls out "King Trump" and his "federal thugs," and promises to remember the events unfolding in the streets of Minneapolis this winter. Springsteen, who has written politically-driven music for decades, has heavily criticized President Trump's policies since he was first elected to office in 2016. Last spring, he released the live EP Land of Hope & Dreams, which included on-stage comments from a show in England calling out the "corrupt, incompetent, and treasonous administration."

    On Wednesday, Bruce Springsteen released a protest song condemning the violence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in Minneapolis. The song memorializes the lives of Renee Macklin Good and Alex Pretti, who were fatally shot by federal agents this month.

    "I wrote this song on Saturday, recorded it yesterday and released it to you today in response to the state terror being visited on the city of Minneapolis," The Boss wrote on social media. "It's dedicated to the people of Minneapolis, our innocent immigrant neighbors and in memory of Alex Pretti and Renee Good. Stay free."

    "Streets of Minneapolis" is a full-band rock and roll song, complete with an E Street Choir singalong. Springsteen's raw and raspy voice is full of indignation as he calls out "King Trump" and his "federal thugs," and promises to remember the events unfolding in the streets of Minneapolis this winter. The verses narrate the killings of Good and Pretti respectively, and underline how eyewitness videos of their deaths contradict government officials' statements.

    "Their claim was self defense, sir / Just don't believe your eyes," Springsteen sings. "It's our blood and bones / And these whistles and phones / Against [Stephen] Miller and [Kristi] Noem's dirty lies."

    Following the shooting of 37-year-old nurse Alex Pretti on Saturday, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem referred to Pretti's actions as "domestic terrorism," saying he "brandished" a gun and "attacked" officers. Noem used similar language to describe Renee Macklin Good's behavior shortly before she was shot by an officer. A preliminary government review of Pretti's case diverts from Noem's initial statements, instead claiming that Pretti resisted arrest before being shot by two Customs and Border Protection officers.

    The release of "Streets of Minneapolis" follows public comments made by Springsteen regarding the ongoing protests. During an appearance at the Light of Day festival in New Jersey earlier this month, he dedicated his performance of "The Promised Land" to Renee Macklin Good, and echoed sentiments expressed by Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey that "ICE should get the f*** out of Minneapolis."

    Springsteen, who has written politically-driven music for decades, has heavily criticized President Trump's policies since he was first elected to office in 2016. Last spring, he released the live EP Land of Hope & Dreams, which included on-stage comments from a show in England calling out the "corrupt, incompetent, and treasonous administration."

    Copyright 2026 NPR