Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Diners line up to get one last taste before 5 p.m.
    People stand in line under a mural reading: Original Pantry Cafe
    The line outside The Original Pantry Cafe on its last day

    Topline:

    Beloved Los Angeles restaurant The Original Pantry Cafe closes today at 5 p.m. after more than 100 years in operation. Hundreds of Angelenos lined up before dawn to get one last taste.

    Why now: The restaurant was owned for decades by former Los Angeles mayor Richard Riordan who died n 2023. Ownership of the restaurant then fell to his administrative trust, which began exploring a sale of the restaurant.

    The backstory: The restaurant opened in 1924 and has amassed many loyal customers over the decades. Several generations of Angelenos have both eaten and worked at the diner over the years. The restaurant is known for its comfort breakfast food and operated 24/7 for many years.

    What's next: Workers at the restaurant are unionized under UNITE HERE Local 11 and have been attempting to negotiate a new contract with the current owners that would guarantee worker protections in the case of new ownership, but a new contract never materialized.

    The Original Pantry Cafe at the corner of 9th and Figueroa streets in downtown L.A first served plates of classic American breakfast in 1924, cultivating a loyal multi-generational base of regulars. More than a hundred years later, the diner is closing down.

    Former L.A. Mayor Richard Riordan bought the restaurant in 1981. After his death, his administrative trust took over ownership, which also oversees the charitable nonprofit Riordan Foundation.

    In a statement to LAist’s media partner KCAL News, the Richard J. Riordan Administrative Trust says selling the restaurant will better fund the foundation’s education work for low-income students.

    Listen 1:28
    The Original Pantry Cafe is set to close. We paid it a visit
    The greasy spoon has legion of fans who waited around the block to bid farewell.

    Riordan operated the restaurant as a passion project, and the Foundation says it was never profitable:

    “The trustees of the Mayor’s estate have determined that closing The Pantry and selling the property upon which it is located is the best path to provide the Foundation with the most financial resources to continue its wonderful charitable mission.”

    End of an era

    Fans of the Pantry have flocked to the greasy spoon for days knowing that it’s closing down. Sunday morning, the mood was bittersweet. A line stretched down the entire block of James M. Wood Boulevard and wrapped around until Francisco Street.

    Word on the line: The wait on this final day of business would be three hours.

    Josephine Garza came from Montebello, making it on the line by 10 a.m. Garza said when learned about the closure from the news, she made plans for one last meal.

    “If it’s the last day I’ve got to eat that bread. I love the bread,” she said. “It’s delicious.”

    Patrons waiting to go in chatted with each other about the iconic food and the memories they had dining at the restaurant over the years.

    For Dolores Rivoli of El Sereno, The Pantry was where she and her late husband went often with the family. She planned to honor him by ordering his favorite meal.

    “He loved the ham steak, the potatoes, the sourdough bread and the delicious pancakes, and of course no one could make coffee like them…He would be here,” Rivoli said.

    Inside the restaurant diners savored meals, drowning food in ketchup and syrup and leaving extra large tips on their tables. Many gave a tap on the shoulder of waiters they’ve known their whole lives, for what is likely the last time.

    They were full of joy and sorrow, and many seemed just happy they got a table at all. The crowd was expected to be nonstop until closing time at 5 p.m.

    Ronnie Medina of Norwalk enjoyed a plate of pancakes and said this meal was just one of many special occasions he’s had at The Pantry.

    “Special moments with my dad at the counter. I shared those same moments with my son,” Medina said. One time he was eating with his son, and realized they had the same waiter who'd served him when he was a little boy some 40 years ago.

    “I asked him, ‘How could that be?’ and he said, ‘Because I’ve never missed a day. And if you came and sat at the counter on a weekday at this time, it was me,’” Medina said.

    Labor negotiations

    Brenda De La Rosa was the lone cashier working Sunday. She’d been at The Pantry for just over a year, but her mother — a decades-long server — had been bringing her here since she was a child.

    She said she’s not sure what she and her mom will do next. “We’re all sad. They gave us a three-week notice,” De La Rosa said. “We’re still gonna protest and try to fight. Customers here are sad, they have many memories.”

    UNITE HERE Local 11, the union representing workers at The Pantry, sought to renegotiate their contract to safeguard work protections in the case of new ownership — but to no avail.

    So by shift's end, it was the end of a chapter for a local institution.

    “Today's our last day. We're hoping [for] a miracle or something, you know,” said  Maricela Granados, who has been working at the Pantry for 26 years. “Thank you for all the loyal customers that we have and everybody's trying to support.”

  • LA County supervisor announces run for new role
    LA County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath speaks during the Dec. 19, 2023 meeting of the LA County Board of Supervisors
    Lindsey Horvath has announced she will run for county CEO in 2028.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath announced Monday that she is running to be the county’s first elected chief executive. Horvath is the only candidate so far to enter the race, which is set for 2028.

    Why it matters: The new executive post will take the place of the county’s appointed CEO and implement key priorities of the county Board of Supervisors.

    Voters created the position in 2024 when they approved Measure G, which was proposed by supervisors Horvath and Janice Hahn.

    Pushback: On Monday, Supervisor Kathryn Barger issued a statement saying she believed it was “premature” to campaign for the new county executive position when it remained unclear whether “the office itself is constitutional.” Barger pointed to questions raised by former federal judge Stephen Larson about whether California’s Constitution allows an elected county executive to veto board decisions, control county contracts and take on powers state law currently gives the Board of Supervisors.

    Go deeper: Supervisors vote to create LA County’s first ethics commission
    LA County’s $2M CEO payout was over claims she was harmed by ballot measure

    Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath announced Monday that she is running to be the county’s first elected chief executive. Horvath is the only candidate so far to enter the race, which is set for 2028.

    The new executive post will take the place of the county’s appointed CEO and implement key priorities of the county Board of Supervisors. The executive will oversee the county budget, which is currently roughly $50 billion, and labor relations with more than 100,000 employees.

    Horvath was first elected to the Board of Supervisors in 2022 and was re-elected in June to another four-year term. She represents the county’s 3rd District, which covers the San Fernando Valley and parts of the Westside and Central Los Angeles. She is a former mayor of West Hollywood.

    The supervisor made her announcement Monday via social media and her campaign website. She called the race a “once-in-a-generation opportunity.”

    The backstory

    Voters created the position in 2024 when they approved Measure G, which was proposed by Supervisors Horvath and Janice Hahn.

    Among other changes, the measure allowed the Board of Supervisors to expand from five to nine members by 2030 and established an independent Ethics Commission, which held its first meeting last month.

    The pushback

    On Monday, Supervisor Kathryn Barger issued a statement saying she believed it was “premature” to campaign for the new county executive position when it remained unclear whether “the office itself is constitutional.”

    Barger pointed to questions raised by former federal judge Stephen Larson about whether California’s Constitution allows an elected county executive to veto board decisions, control county contracts and take on powers state law currently gives the Board of Supervisors.

    “Moving forward with an office that would fundamentally change how Los Angeles County is governed, without first resolving these questions, is putting the cart before the horse,” Barger said in her statement. “We need clarity.”

    The primary election is scheduled for March 7, 2028.

  • Sponsored message
  • LAUSD reviewing; AI committee meets Friday
     In this photo illustration, the Google Chrome search engine home page is displayed on the screen of a computer on June 08, 2023 in Paris, France.
    Google says Search will be turned off for schools who restrict use of artificial intelligence.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles Unified School District said it’s reviewing Google’s announcement this week that it will not allow schools from using its search engine unless they opt in to using artificial intelligence.

    The backstory: Earlier this school year, LAUSD implemented a moratorium on students using generative AI on district-issued devices. Currently, students in LAUSD can still use Google to search for information, but the AI mode — in which students can chat with the company’s chatbot, Gemini — is turned off.

    What’s new: A Google executive said, "search and AI are deeply integrated” and that search would not be available to schools that bar AI.

    What’s next: “We are reviewing Google’s announcement and its potential implications for schools, educators, and students,” said a spokesperson for LAUSD. The district’s Ad Hoc Committee on Generative AI will have its next meeting on Nov. 13.

    The Los Angeles Unified School District said it’s reviewing how to proceed after Google’s announcement last week that it will not allow schools to use its search engine unless they opt in to using artificial intelligence.

    Google said that in the coming months, access to products like Gemini and Google Search would be turned off by default until schools turn them on, saying it believes “schools should have control over AI in their classroom.” But Google Search, by default, includes an AI chatbot and uses AI to summarize search results — meaning that schools that restrict AI would not have access to Google Search.

    Earlier this school year, LAUSD implemented a moratorium on students using generative AI on district-issued devices.

    “We are reviewing Google’s announcement and its potential implications for schools, educators and students,” said a spokesperson for LAUSD. “Los Angeles Unified believes emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, have the potential to enhance teaching and learning when introduced thoughtfully, responsibly and with clear safeguards.”

    “Search and A.I. are deeply integrated,” Chris Phillips, vice president for education at Google, said to The New York Times. He told the outlet that if a school bans AI, students “will not have access to search, and they’ll see a message from their school that indicates it’s not available.”

    How to weigh in

    LAUSD's Generative AI Ad Hoc Committee will meet on Friday, Nov. 13 from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m.

    The agenda is posted here.

    The board meets in person in downtown Los Angeles at 333 S. Beaudry Ave, and also streams its meetings online, and offers American Sign Language and Spanish interpretation.

    Community members can also request interpretation in other languages by contacting the Board Secretariat at secretariat@lausd.net or (213) 241-7002.

    For more on how to be involved with LAUSD and its meetings (including where to park for board meetings!), read our handy guide.

    Currently, students in LAUSD can still use Google to search for information, a district spokesperson said, but the AI mode — in which students can converse with the company’s chatbot, Gemini — is turned off. Some searches may still show an AI-generated summary or overview. The district has asked Google for a modification to allow the summaries to be turned off.

    If a school does opt in to artificial intelligence, Google said it will offer a “guided learning” tool in its chatbot for student accounts “to help them work through problems without skipping straight to answers.”

    The announcement has prompted outcry from advocates. "Google forced its AI products into classrooms, and parents fought back," said Lila Byock, founder of Schools Beyond Screens, the group that pushed for LAUSD’s AI moratorium, as well as the district’s screen time limit. "Now Google is refusing to take no for an answer. … Schools Beyond Screens calls on district leaders to reclaim their authority from corporate interests and divest from Google."

    The district’s ad hoc committee on generative AI is scheduled to have its next meeting on Nov. 13.

  • Impeachment resolution filed for Sec of Defense
    A man wearing a blue suit and blue and white striped tie sits at a desk, speaking into a microphone. In front of him is a sign that reads, "HON Hegseth."
    Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth faces questions about Iran in congressional appearance.

    Topline:

    Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky moved Monday to force a vote to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, setting the stage for a dramatic vote on whether to remove one of the Trump administration’s most prominent figures following sweeping election losses.



    Why now: The Pentagon chief is bearing the brunt of anger and calls for his ouster after the Iran war and its economic impact contributed to severe Republican losses in the midterm elections that cost the party control of Congress. The impeachment resolution was introduced by Massie, a Kentucky Republican, as soon as the House opened for the first day of sessions after the midterms. It largely focuses on the war in Iran but also includes references to Hegseth’s role in carrying out military actions in Yemen and Venezuela. Massie said the secretary’s actions amount to “high crimes and misdemeanors” and his leadership at the Pentagon “thus warrants impeachment.”

    What's next: A vote in the House could come by mid-week, putting pressure on Republicans — many of whom blamed their election wipeout on the Iran war — but next steps are highly uncertain. Most House Democrats are expected to support impeaching Hegseth, with Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries saying over the weekend it’s time for the Defense secretary to go.

    Rep. Thomas Massie moved Monday to force a vote to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, setting the stage for a dramatic vote on whether to remove one of the Trump administration’s most prominent figures following sweeping election losses.

    The impeachment resolution was introduced by Massie, a Kentucky Republican, as soon as the House opened for the first day of sessions after the midterms. It largely focuses on the war in Iran but also includes references to Hegseth’s role in carrying out military actions in Yemen and Venezuela.

    Massie said the secretary’s actions amount to “high crimes and misdemeanors” and his leadership at the Pentagon “thus warrants impeachment.”

    A vote in the House could come by mid-week, putting pressure on Republicans — many of whom blamed their election wipeout on the Iran war — but next steps are highly uncertain.


    House Speaker Mike Johnson had tried to prevent this outcome, and warned lawmakers against impeaching the Defense secretary while the U.S. is engaged in military actions in the Middle East.

    “Impeaching a Cabinet secretary right now, especially the Department of War in the middle of hostilities abroad would be a terrible, terrible look, a terrible thing for our allies and our enemies to see that,” Johnson, a Republican, said as he opened the chamber.

    “We don’t impeach Cabinet secretaries for political gain or for cheap tricks, and I think that’s what this is and I think everybody knows it.”

    Most House Democrats are expected to support impeaching Hegseth, with Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries saying over the weekend it’s time for the Defense secretary to go.

    If the House votes to impeach Hegseth, it would next go to the Senate for a potential trial. Republicans remain in the majority in both chambers, until the new Congress convenes in January with Democrats in control.

    Hegseth issues his own defense and prepares for a fight

    Hegseth maintains he’s eager to litigate the military actions that he and President Donald Trump have taken against Iran, Yemen’s Iranian-backed Houthi rebels and Venezuela’s previous leaders.

    “If you want to take issue with what we did in Epic Fury or Rough Rider or nabbing Nicolás Maduro, you’re taking issue with the troops and what they accomplished, which is historic,” Hegseth told reporters Monday, using the military code names for the Iran war and campaign of strikes to halt the Houthis’ attacks on shipping in the Middle East.

    Hegseth also announced that he would hold a rare news conference on Tuesday — his first in over 180 days — on the impeachment threat. His last briefing was in May, and he has not held one on the Iran war, strikes on alleged drug-trafficking boats or other U.S. military actions since then.

    The Pentagon chief is bearing the brunt of anger and calls for his ouster after the Iran war and its economic impact contributed to severe Republican losses in the midterm elections that cost the party control of Congress.

    Hegseth waves off impeachment push as ‘noise’

    Hegseth, after giving a speech at the Naval War College in Rhode Island, brushed aside the impeachment push.

    “There’s a lot of politically motivated people who may have substantial policy disagreements, but their disagreements are with success,” he told reporters. He added that “if we want to litigate” the military actions that the Trump administration has taken, “I’m happy to do it all day long.”

    “My team, we’re not worried about the noise — it’s what I told the troops, too — ‘don’t worry about the noise,’” he said.


    Asked about Vice President JD Vance blaming the Iran war for the massive GOP losses in the election, Hegseth noted that Trump said he would do it again, and “I agree.”

    He largely repeated a line that Secretary of State Marco Rubio said to reporters a day earlier: “It doesn’t have to be necessarily popular, but it can be necessary.”

    Hegseth argued that the war was necessary because “someone had to confront the Iranian regime’s pursuit of a nuclear weapon” and said “the choice was don’t act and wish it away or take a bold move.”

    Iran has long maintained that its nuclear program is peaceful. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran has 440.9 kilograms (972 pounds) of uranium that is enriched up to 60% purity, a short, technical step from weapons-grade levels of 90%.


    Trump defended Hegseth to reporters on Sunday night.

    “He’s guilty of two things, basically winning two wars,” Trump said. “I believe we saved the Middle East and Israel combined. And it’s awfully hard to say let’s impeach somebody who did that.”

    Pentagon chief insists ‘Iran is devastated’

    Hegseth reiterated that “Iran is devastated,” even though the Islamic Republic has been able to keep striking military bases in the Middle East that are used by the United States, causing billions of dollars in damage, as well as commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz. Disruptions to shipping in the waterway, where one-fifth of the world’s oil passed before the war, have led to higher energy prices that hit voters’ pocketbooks.


    He said the next steps on the war are up to Trump, including telling Iran: “Hey, we’re done, and we’re going to watch your nuclear material. You better not move it.”

    Hegseth’s defense of the war comes after about 6 in 10 voters said the U.S. made the “wrong decision” in taking military action against Iran, according to The AP Voter Poll, a survey of more than 100,000 voters in the United States.

    With anger in Congress rising, Hegseth has been on a social media blitz, posting a video last week acknowledging the threat of impeachment. He said it would be “all about the politics of personal destruction” and insisted that “won’t work with me. You can rest assured of that.”

    Since then, scores of political appointees within the Pentagon have posted images of Hegseth emblazoned with the words, “Stand. Fight. Defend the Republic.” The White House also posted a video to social media that featured praise from Trump.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Kevin Freking and Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report.

  • What to expect from the remaining term

    Topline:

    It is the final hoorah for the 119th Congress. Republicans have just weeks left in control of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The main thing on the agenda: keeping the federal government open. Funding is set to run out on December 11, when a stop-gap measure passed about a month ahead of the midterms expires.

    Why to expect: Any funding extension is all but certain to be done through another short-term bill, known as a continuing resolution. The typical government funding process — 12 carefully negotiated appropriations bills — would take time and political will that lawmakers currently lack. Congress will also need to find a path forward on the National Defense Authorization Act, long considered a must-pass annual military funding package. This year, the bill is quagmired in the unforgiving politics of the Iran war. The conflict is opposed by a majority of Americans — something President Trump has acknowledged was a key force in driving his party out of power.

    It is the final hoorah for the 119th Congress. Republicans have just weeks left in control of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The main thing on the agenda: keeping the federal government open. Funding is set to run out on December 11, when a stop-gap measure passed about a month ahead of the midterms expires.

    Any funding extension is all but certain to be done through another short-term bill, known as a continuing resolution. The typical government funding process — 12 carefully negotiated appropriations bills — would take time and political will that lawmakers currently lack.

    Congress will also need to find a path forward on the National Defense Authorization Act, long considered a must-pass annual military funding package. This year, the bill is quagmired in the unforgiving politics of the Iran war. The conflict is opposed by a majority of Americans — something President Trump has acknowledged was a key force in driving his party out of power.

    The House is also likely to vote on an impeachment effort targeting Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Introduced by Republican Thomas Massie of Kentucky, a key figure in forcing the administration's release of the Epstein files, the impeachment measure lists a number of charges, including that the administration failed to properly consult Congress on the military campaign.

    Democrats are unlikely to be in a compromising mood on legislation, just weeks away from taking control of both chambers. That means continued work on big-ticket items like the Protect College Sports Act, meant to introduce new regulations around college athlete compensation, and a bipartisan energy permitting overhaul will likely wait until the new term.

    With slim majorities in both chambers, they could also have to contend with some attendance problems after a demoralizing performance in last week's midterm elections. That further complicates passing legislation through chambers already governed by the thinnest of majorities.

    Mike Ricci, a Republican strategist with the group Seven Letter and aide to former Speakers of the House John Boehner and Paul Ryan, told NPR that a number of forces could help draw reluctant lame duck legislators back to Washington, including winding down their offices, finding new work and attending the White House Christmas party.

    Copyright 2026 NPR