Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Celebrate for $100 per person at these spots
    A close up of beautifully formed heart shaped ravioli, slightly dusted with flour, atop a piece of white parchment paper
    Heart shaped ravioli at Pasta Sisters

    Topline:

    It may sound like the proverbial unicorn, but it does exist — restaurants where you can get excellent high quality food and drinks without taking out a second mortgage. These places have thoughtfully put together packages and specialties for around $100 each person. (Some are even $100 for both of you). Why not head to one of them and save your money for the rest of your relationship?

    Why it matters: Because while love don't cost a thing, in reality... it does. So why not be smart while celebrating your successful coupling?

    Why now: As much as you want to be a Valentine's Day grinch, you know you'll get sucked in. So start planning!

    Happy (upcoming) Valentine's Day, Los Angeles! Feb. 14 is just around the corner. And whether you're tethered to another human on this Hallmark holiday, overpaying on a day to celebrate the purity of love is just plain heartless. (Call me unromantic, but I stand my ground).

    Why not say I love you for less this year and save some money for the rest of your relationship?

    Everything you'll find here is $100 per person or less, (with some being $100 total!)

    The Exchange at The Freehand Hotel (Downtown Los Angeles)

    If you're looking for a meal that really has heart, consider one where 15% of your romantic night out will go to benefit those affected by the L.A. wildfires. The Exchange at Freehand L.A. is doing an I Heart LA Coast-to-Coast menu in downtown Los Angeles along with their partner restaurant in New York by "marrying" the menus of their head chefs Narita Santos (L.A.) and Felipe Donnelly (NYC).

    The inside of a modern-looking dining room inside a restaurant, with light brown leather booths and various tables and chairs throughout the space. Above are large lanterns, and in the background are windows that look onto an outdoor street scene.
    The Exchange Dining Room
    (
    Courtesy The Exchange
    )

    The three-course prix fixe includes items like oysters with hibiscus leche de tigre, kampachi aquachile with pan-seared black Coho salmon, and chocolate tres leches for dessert.

    The Price of Love: Prix fixe $70 per person
    Reservations: OpenTable February 13 and 14, beginning at 6 p.m.

    Written Hand (The Kimpton Everly Hollywood)

    A series of shucked oysters that sit in various positions against a white surface
    Complimentary oysters, shucked table side at The Written Hand in Hollywood.
    (
    Pixabay
    )

    It's Bivalve-ntine’s Day at Written Hand, where they're toasting the day of love with a prix fixe that's all about the aphrodisiac.

    The meal begins with complimentary oysters, shucked tableside for your enjoyment that can be paired with briny freezer martinis. There's also bread from Bub & Grandmas, Ama Ebi Kauai prawns, squash blossoms, and a shared entree with either a ribeye cap blue-fin tuna collar or ike jime rockfish.

    The Price of Love: $75 per person
    Reservations: OpenTable beginning at 5 p.m.

    Barra Santos (Cypress Park)

    A small, round, white marble dining table is positioned in a corner, with dark wooden bistro-style chairs and a place setting with wine. On the left side is a large window, partially covered by a small white curtain . On the right-hand wall, a blue and white tiled surface features a large painting of a round dining table with a tablecloth and dishes.
    An intimate dinning corner dining area at Barra Santos in Cypress Park.
    (
    Allison Zaucha
    /
    Courtesy Barra Santos
    )

    Barra Santos hosts "a party every night," and Valentine's Day should be no exception. This neighborhood gem from co-owner Mike Santos and chef Melissa López offers Portuguese snacks to pair with pours of Madeira wine alongside larger dishes like piri piri chicken ($22). The specials for V-Day are still forthcoming, but you can pair a bottle of Barra Santos vinho ($40) with the Lisbon special ($31) trio of snack plates and have yourself an enjoyable and wallet-friendly kind of nite.

    The Price of Love: wines by the glass from $11, entrées $20 - $30.
    Reservations: Resy (but don't delay; this spot books up quickly.)

    Bar Lis (Hollywood-Thompson Hotel)

    The patio features an al-fresco bar space with an illuminated bar surrounded by a line of orange-cushioned stools. In the center, there is a fountain, and two modern wicker chairs are positioned nearby. The bar offers a view of a hilly cityscape at night.
    Bar Lis at Thompson Hollywood
    (
    Michael Mundy
    /
    Courtesy Thompson Hollywood
    )

    Hollywood's rooftop French Riviera, Bar Lis, has two options that will take your breath away.

    The Sunset Hour Prix Fixe Dinner includes cauliflower panna cotta with caviar and oyster leaves, beet gnocchi, and a choice of New York steak or duck breast for $78 a person. The Bar Lis Canapé Package features a bottle of GH Mumm brut champagne and a canapé platter with tuna and radish tartare and duck yuzu kosho tacos. The price is $150 per couple, and that includes hypnotic music and views for days.

    The Price of Love: $78 per person for the Sunset Hour Prix Fixe Dinner; $150 per couple for the Bar Lis Canapé Package.
    Reservations: reservations@barlisla.com for February 13 to February 15, from 5:00 p.m. to 8:45 p.m.

    Pasta Sisters (Culver City)

    A large white bowl is filled with cooked tortellini.
    Tortellini from L.A.'s Pasta Sisters
    (
    Courtesy Pasta Sisters
    )

    Keep it a bit more casual at Pasta Sisters, where you can enjoy glasses of wine ($12) while nibbling heart-shaped ravioli either in the restaurant or in your own home.

    The ravioli are filled with porcini mushroom and ricotta cheese and are available for dine-in ($21) or as a ravioli pasta kit to go, which feeds two and includes edible flowers ($40). The restaurant will also be offering 10% off select bottles of Italian Pinot Noir if you're purchasing the kit.

    The Price of Love: A night of pasta and wine for two will cost less than $100.
    Reservations: walk ins only; order online to enjoy these culinary creations in your own kitchen.

    Redbird (Little Tokyo)

    A white bowl containing a cooked fish mixture with vegetables sits inside bright orange liquid against an orange surface.
    Lobster Chawanmushi at Redbird
    (
    Courtesy Redbird
    )

    Enjoy Valentine's Day in the church of love at a fraction of the cost when you dine in the Garden Bar area of Redbird by chef Neal Frasier. Redbird is located in the former Cathedral of St. Vibiana, specifically the Cardinal's house (hence the red bird), and for Valentine's Day, they are serving a special three-course prix fixe menu for $150 a person in the main dining room. While that might sound enticing, you can keep the costs down and still enjoy a selection from the prix fixe menu when you choose à la carte pricing in the Redbird Garden Bar.

    A perfect night out for two might include Humboldt Fog on griddled sourdough ($16), profiteroles with chicken liver parfait ($16), chawanmushi with kaluga caviar and uni ($38), and two glasses of Domaine des Ronces Bubbles ($17 each).

    The Price of Love: Menu is à la carte, so it's up to you.
    Reservations: Walk-ins only from 5 p.m. on February 14 and 15.

    SOCALO (Santa Monica Gateway Hotel)

    A round cocktail glass with an etched surface, containing red liquid, sits on a wooden bar top that overlooks a small outdoor patio during the daytime.
    Amor de Los Angeles Cocktail at SOCALO
    (
    Courtesy SOCALO
    )

    SOCALO, from chef duo Susan Feniger and Mary Sue Milliken, is putting some SOCAL into your LOve life with fresh, modern Mexican cuisine in a uniquely Los Angeles environment steps away from the Santa Monica Pier.

    The Valentine's Day prix fixe kicks off with a sparkling wine toast for two. Next, you'll enjoy a ceviche trio with such delicacies as tuna with peanut matcha salsa and ono with passion fruit habanero. The main course features a 16oz bone-in rib eye and yuzu glazed seared shrimp with broccolini and romesco. Dessert is a red velvet cake with strawberry crema and spumoni ice cream.

    The specialty cocktail for the night is an Amor de Los Angeles, made with tequila, pama liqueur, and topped off with pomegranate seeds and a black salt rim ($16).

    The Price of Love: Prix fixe $165 for two; Happy Hour $5 beers, $8 cocktails, and $8 - $10 glasses of Mexican wine.
    Reservations: OpenTable from 4 p.m. February 14 and 15. Happy Hour 3 p.m. to 6 p.m.

    The Velvet Martini Lounge (Studio City)

    A stage with red curtains features a large black grand piano, two microphones set up against it, and a small curved bar areas with cushioned seats.
    The Velvet Martini Lounge
    (
    Courtesy Eat Drink LA
    )

    If you love crooners and cozy corners, The Velvet Martini Lounge is about to become your new favorite secret speakeasy. It's located above the Italian restaurant Vitellos and features live music, dim lighting, and no windows — kinda like Las Vegas.

    The food menu is minimal, with throwback items like a TV Dinner Tray, but I recommend focusing on cocktails and conversation instead. Try a Jazzerac made with Hennessey, Luxardo Amaretto, bitters, and finished with an absinthe mist.

    The Price of Love: Cocktail prices hover around $18; no cover for live music.
    Reservations:  OpenTable beginning at 5 p.m.

    Vincenzo's Pizza of NoHo (North Hollywood)

    A heart-shaped pizza with red pepperonis and melted cheese that's slightly charred around the edges on a round metal tray.
    Heart-shaped pizza at Vincenzo's of Noho
    (
    Courtesy EatDrinkLA
    )

    Eat your heart out when you order this special heart-shaped pizza from Vincenzo's Pizza of Noho. The small size measures 14" and is made for two people to share. Complete the meal with a chocolate vin-yay, which are beignets with powdered sugar and a Nutella drizzle ($6).

    The Price of Love: The 14" with one topping is $25.
    Reservations: Walk ins only; order from their website or with your favorite delivery apps.

    Malibu Wines + Beer Garden (West Hills)

    A woman with a light skin tone is sitting at a wooden table. She is wearing a red sweater and has red hair. Next to her, another person with light skin is holding out a glass, while a third person, who is out of the frame, is about to pour a glass of rosé wine into it. In front of each person seated at the table, there is a cheese plate.
    Malibu Wines and Beer Garden
    (
    Pixabay
    )

    Love shouldn't be limited to just one day, and Malibu Wines & Beer Garden wants you to celebrate all week. Visit anytime from Feb. 10 to 17 for a two-flight wine tasting of Saddlerock wines and a curated cheese board.

    The Price of Love: $65 per couple for a 2.5-hour table reservation
    Reservations: Tock

    Catch more of Caroline's suggestions at EatDrinkLA

  • US' World Cup run end in 4-1 loss

    Topline:

    The Americans' World Cup exit on Monday was the same as it ever was: Eliminated yet again in the Round of 16 at the hands of a European team — this time, Belgium, by a score of 4-1.


    How we got here: From the moment they stepped onto the Seattle field, the U.S. was outclassed by their opponent, No. 9-ranked Belgium. Countless turnovers and defensive lapses were seized on by the Belgians, who needed only nine minutes to take a 1-0 lead.
    The context: The U.S. men's national team came into this FIFA World Cup with a lineup full of players with key roles in Europe's top leagues. They had the name-brand coach — Mauricio Pochettino, of Tottenham, PSG and Chelsea fame. And they had homefield advantage, with every game on U.S. soil for the first time in three decades.

    The controversy: The U.S. had entered Monday's game under a cloud of controversy around their striker Folarin Balogun, who was shown a red card in last week's Round of 32 match against Bosnia-Herzegovina. An automatic one-game suspension was set to sideline Balogun, the Americans' leading scorer at the World Cup, for Monday's game. Then, the day before the game, a FIFA disciplinary panel took the highly unusual step of delaying Balogun's suspension by a year to allow him to participate. Then, news broke that President Trump had personally called FIFA president Gianni Infantino to encourage him to review the red card.

    Read on... for more on U.S.' exit.

    SEATTLE — This time was supposed to be different.

    The U.S. men's national team came into this FIFA World Cup with a lineup full of players with key roles in Europe's top leagues. They had the name-brand coach — Mauricio Pochettino, of Tottenham, PSG and Chelsea fame. And they had homefield advantage, with every game on U.S. soil for the first time in three decades.

    For weeks, the hype seemed like it might be real: The team's three wins over Paraguay, Australia and Bosnia-Herzegovina were the most ever by a U.S. men's squad in a World Cup. A new generation of American fans filled stadiums by the tens of thousands and tuned in on TV by the tens of millions.

    But in the end, the Americans' exit was the same as it ever was: Eliminated yet again in the Round of 16 at the hands of a European team — this time, Belgium, by a score of 4-1.

    From the moment they stepped onto the Seattle field, the U.S. was outclassed by their opponent, No. 9-ranked Belgium. Countless turnovers and defensive lapses were seized on by the Belgians, who needed only nine minutes to take a 1-0 lead.

    Then, once the Americans equalized on a free kick by midfielder Malik Tillman, Belgium scored yet again in barely a minute of play. Belgian forward Charles De Ketelaere scored both his team's first-half goals.

    After halftime, came an embarrassing nail in the coffin that silenced the Seattle sellout crowd for good — a 57th minute roll-in by Hans Vanaken after a slip-up by goalkeeper Matt Freese outside of the penalty area left the goal unguarded. Belgian forward Romelu Lukaku added a stoppage-time goal to seal the final score at 4-1.

    Three men in dark blue soccer kits celebrate on a field while running.
    Malik Tillman #17 of the United States celebrates scoring his team's only goal during their World Cup match against Belgium. In what was one of the few bright spots of the game, the U.S. pulled even with Belgium at 1-1. The tie lasted less than two minutes before Belgium scored again.
    (
    Luke Hales
    /
    Getty Images
    )

    The U.S. had entered Monday's game under a cloud of controversy around their striker Folarin Balogun, who was shown a red card in last week's Round of 32 match against Bosnia-Herzegovina. An automatic one-game suspension was set to sideline Balogun, the Americans' leading scorer at the World Cup, for Monday's game.

    Then, the day before the game, a FIFA disciplinary panel took the highly unusual step of delaying Balogun's suspension by a year to allow him to participate. Then, news broke that President Trump had personally called FIFA president Gianni Infantino to encourage him to review the red card.

    The Royal Belgian Football Association said it would protest Balogun's inclusion in the lineup. But even at full strength, the U.S. were never real contenders in Monday's game.

    Belgium will advance to the quarterfinals for the third time in the past four World Cups, where it will face Spain on Friday in Los Angeles.
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • California bill would require assessment by 2028
    Small square white cards show the numbers 1 through 7 in black text. There are also cards with gray clouds, a sun and rain clouds.
    Numbers are everywhere in kindergarten, but are all students learning the math concepts?

    Topline:

    California could begin testing students as early as kindergarten in math if a bill currently going through the state legislature becomes law.

    Why it matters: Proponents of Senate Bill 1067, including state Sen. Akilah Weber Pierson, say the goal is to identify students who are falling behind in math early so they can get help. More than 60% of California students fall below the benchmark on the state’s standardized math test.

    How the law would work: By January 2028, schools would have to choose a math test for young learners from a list created by the state’s education department. The state must also provide guidance for educators on how to interpret and explain test results to families. The test results could not be used in teacher evaluations, student grades or to identify a disability.

    What's next: The bill passed the state Senate unanimously in May and is now moving through the Assembly.

    Read on… to learn more about why it’s challenging to assess young students’ math skills. 

    California could begin testing students as early as kindergarten in math.

    Proponents of Senate Bill 1067, including state Sen. Akilah Weber Pierson, say the goal is to identify students who are falling behind in math early so they can get help. More than 60% of California students perform below the benchmark on the state’s standardized math test.

    “Math learning is cumulative, and when students fall behind in the early grades it becomes much harder to catch up,” Weber Pierson wrote in support of the bill. “At its core, this bill is about making sure every child builds a strong foundation in math, opening the door to lasting academic achievement, meaningful career pathways, and lifelong success in California’s innovation economy.”

    How the law would work

    By January 2028, schools would have to choose a math test for kindergarten, first and second grades from a list created by the state’s education department.

    The State Board of Education would set the criteria for the test and consider multiple factors, including learning standards for math and how students’ demographic information, including their primary language, may affect their performance.

    Listen 13:35
    Listen: AirTalk discusses testing kindergartners in math

    The state must also provide guidance for educators on how to interpret and explain test results to families. The results could not be used in teacher evaluations, student grades or to identify a disability.

    The Senate Appropriations Committee found it would cost more than $100 million to develop and select the test, train educators and provide ongoing support as the policy is implemented.

    What are the possible challenges?

    Megan Franke, professor of education and vice chair of professional programs at UCLA, said one challenge is that many standardized assessments do not reflect all students' understanding of mathematical concepts.

    “Young children solve problems differently than adults do, and they don't all solve problems in the same way at the same time,” Franke said.

    For example, a student who doesn't remember the word for “11” may not lack an understanding of the number system, they just may be struggling with the vocabulary.

    “Our number system is a little bit wonky, [in] that we don't count ten-one, ten-two, ten-three,” Franke said. “We made up words — eleven, twelve and thirteen.”

    Franke said there may also be other reasons why students struggle with standardized assessments, including difficulty using technology or anxiety.

    Franke said a single test, or intervention, is not a long-term solution.

    “Really, we should be thinking about schools and how we help schools be these places…where they're creating these rich opportunities for each and every student to learn mathematics,” Franke said.

    What's next 

    The bill passed the state Senate unanimously in May and is now moving through the Assembly. You can sign up to track the bill's progress through the California Legislative Information website.

  • The meaning behind the hopeful World Cup chant
    A medium skin toned man holds a large Mexican flag, his arms raised. It's nighttime. A young girl wearing a green Mexico jersey helps him hold the flag.
    Despite Mexico’s 2-3 loss against England on Sunday, the chant “¿Y si sí?” took on a new kind of power for Mexico fans during the team’s World Cup run.

    Topline:

    As Mexico took on England in the World Cup’s Round of 16 on Sunday, fans had one thing to say: “¿Y si sí?”

    What does it mean? The chant means, “What if yes?” What if the Mexican national team wins the World Cup? What if Mexico breaks (more) historic records? It’s full of hope and optimism. (Mexico ultimately was knocked out by England, 3-2.)

    Read on … for why the phrase hits home with so many Mexican soccer fans.

    As Mexico took on England in the World Cup’s Round of 16 on Sunday, fans had one thing to say: “¿Y si sí?”

    The chant translates to “What if, yes?” It refers to the swirling hope of: what if the Mexican national team wins the World Cup? What if Mexico breaks (more) historic records? What if?

    The saying grew louder after Mexico ended a 40-year curse with a 2-0 win against Ecuador last week. The national team had not won a World Cup knockout game since 1986. Not only did the team advance to the Round of 16 knockout stage, but it did so without conceding a single goal.

    Despite Mexico’s 3-2 loss against England on Sunday, “¿Y si sí?” took on a new kind of power for Mexico fans during the team’s World Cup run, especially in Southern California.

    What does the phrase mean for fans? 

    Jorge Leal, an assistant professor of history at UC Riverside, told LAist the term has grown in popularity in the last couple of weeks.

    “It's a way of saying maybe it can happen this time. It gives people a new chant, and it's hopeful,” Leal said. “From being ‘Si se puede,’ which is a great phrase, but it's very tentative, to the ‘¿Y si, sí?’ I think it's a little more affirmative.”

    “¿Y si sí?” is more empowering, whereas “Si se puede” is more aspirational, Leal added.

    Sebastian Garcia said the phrase started off as more of a joke at the top of the tournament.

    “Everyone kind of knew Mexico's history, and it was like it'd be cool, but it wouldn't happen,” Garcia said. “And then, as they started playing and they started winning … you start believing it, and then it kind of takes you over.”

    What makes this team different? 

    There are many reasons why this Mexican national team differs from previous years.

    “We cannot discount that they're playing at home, and that home advantage is huge,” Leal said. “This national team came together with really low expectations. People were very skeptical, myself included. There's a couple really great players, but most of them are young or improving.”

    Throughout the global tournament, however, that skepticism turned into optimism.

    “This national team has beaten the odds,” Leal said. “We were not expecting much of them, but now we can dream that they're going to beat expectations.”

    Nevertheless, Sunday’s loss was heartbreaking, Leal said.

    https://www.instagram.com/p/DaPQ-RyA7jA/

    Why it matters 

    Mari Garcia said Mexican Americans, and Latinos overall, have been feeling so much uncertainty in the last year, especially following last summer’s ICE raids.

    “Another soccer player, when asked about that phrase, he said ‘¿Por que no?’ (Why not?), and I think that's simply the answer,” Mari said. “(It’s) reaffirming that we are capable of doing anything.”

    Mexico’s run was more than 20 days of euphoria that show how unifying global events can be, Leal added.

    “We have been in an era that ethnic Mexicans, Mexican Americans, Chicanos, people of Mexican descent - we have been under persecution,” Leal said.

    As the World Cup continues on, Leal said, what keeps us from continuing the watch parties and collectivity?

    “Obviously, the ones for the Mexican team are much more fun, but … I think in L.A., in a region that sorely needs this type of collective event, we can see how they can bring people together,” Leal said. “It's very bittersweet, but I think that we can … rejoice that it happened, that we lived through this very special three-and-a-half weeks.”

  • Man sues agency after agents tracked him down
    Two screenshots from a security camera, side by side, showing a man and a woman, both wearing dark blue jackets, approaching the front door of a home. There is a bicycle propped up against a railing to the left of the photos.
    Two federal agents in blue jackets stand on David Streever's porch at his home in Rochester, N.Y.

    Topline:

    Rochester, N.Y. resident David Streever is suing the Department of Homeland Security after federal agents tried last month to track him down and give him a warning notice alleging that he had potentially violated the law when he wrote a harsh email months earlier to the former head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

    About the lawsuit: Filed by the nonprofit Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression on Monday in federal court in Washington, D.C., the lawsuit argues that Streever's January email was protected speech and the federal agents' and their superiors violated Streever's First Amendment rights. FIRE's lawsuit says the First Amendment protects Americans' rights to speak out against police but says the "Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is actively threatening that freedom, tracking down and retaliating against speakers like Plaintiff David Streever because he exercised his fundamental right to criticize one of the highest-ranking law enforcement officers in the United States."
    The backstory: Streever wrote to Todd Lyons, who stepped down as the acting director of ICE at the end of May, on Jan. 26 after federal immigration officers in Minneapolis fatally shot two U.S. citizen observers during the immigration enforcement surge there. The three-paragraph note compared Lyons to a Nazi and predicted that Lyons would be tormented by his own conscience. It has the subject line, "What's next." Five months later, on June 23, two HSI agents rang the doorbell of Streever's Rochester home and then left a document with Streever's wife for him to sign. It was labeled "WARNING NOTICE" and "YOU MAY BE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW," and described federal laws that make it a crime to threaten federal officials.

    Federal agents with Homeland Security Investigations tried to track down Rochester, N.Y. resident David Streever last month and give him a warning notice alleging that he had potentially violated the law when he wrote a harsh email months earlier to the former head of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

    Now a lawsuit filed by the nonprofit Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression on Monday in federal court in Washington, D.C. argues Streever's January email was protected speech and the federal agents' and their superiors violated Streever's First Amendment rights.

    NPR reported last week about HSI agents trying to contact Streever first at his home and later at a hotel over an email that Streever wrote to Todd Lyons, who stepped down as the acting director of ICE at the end of May.

    FIRE's lawsuit says the First Amendment protects Americans' rights to speak out against police but says the "Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is actively threatening that freedom, tracking down and retaliating against speakers like Plaintiff David Streever because he exercised his fundamental right to criticize one of the highest-ranking law enforcement officers in the United States."

    The suit goes on to say, "Our Constitution does not tolerate such a brazen abuse of authority."

    Streever wrote to Lyons' government email address on Jan. 26 after federal immigration officers in Minneapolis fatally shot two U.S. citizen observers during the immigration enforcement surge there.

    The three-paragraph note compared Lyons to a Nazi and predicted that Lyons would be tormented by his own conscience. It has the subject line, "What's next."

    Five months later, on June 23, two HSI agents rang the doorbell of Streever's Rochester home and then left a document with Streever's wife for him to sign. It was labeled "WARNING NOTICE" and "YOU MAY BE IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW," and described federal laws that make it a crime to threaten federal officials. The notice said ICE's Office of Professional Responsibility had identified an email to Lyons that may violate federal law and the office "is requesting that you promptly remove and/or discontinue the aforementioned behavior."

    The bottom of the form reads, "Receipt of this Notice will be taken into consideration, should you continue to be involved in any criminal activities described above."

    Streever was taking his 7-year-old daughter on a vacation to a Finnish theme park when the agents visited his home. He and his daughter landed at New York City's John F. Kennedy International Airport two days later and made their way to a nearby airport hotel to sleep.

    That evening, Streever was told by the hotel front desk that a federal agent from the Department of Homeland Security had come to see him and had left a business card. His wife had not told the agents which hotel he would be staying at, raising questions about how Streever had been tracked to that location.

    "Like many Americans, I was deeply upset after the shootings in Minnesota and I felt compelled to do something," Streever said in a statement. "Writing an email to the head of ICE seemed like the least I could do to express my sense of outrage. I never dreamed it would lead to a knock on my door by federal officers or descending on my hotel in the dark of night."

    The lawsuit names three federal agents who tried to contact Streever as defendants along with Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin and ICE officials.

    The suit argues the federal agents' actions have caused Streever to self-censor his views, and alleges they violated a First Amendment bar on the government threatening people over protected speech.

    The lawsuit asks for the court to find that Streever's email was protected by the First Amendment, and to bar defendants "from taking any further actions, formal or informal, to coerce, threaten, retaliate against, or intimate repercussions directly or indirectly to Plaintiff Streever for his protected speech and petitioning activity."

    The suit also asks the court to declare the warning notices federal agents are issuing people are "sufficient" to chill free expression protected by the First Amendment.

    "ICE's issuance of formal "WARNING NOTICE" documents to critics who engage in protected speech—and its decision to have federal agents deliver those warnings in person—can have only one purpose: to systemically chill ICE's critics and coerce them into silence," the suit reads.

    DHS initially responded with the same statement that it provided last week when NPR first asked about Streever's case. "ICE investigates all credible threats towards its employees and officers, including threats to the ICE Director. As a matter of policy, we do not comment on any ongoing investigations."

    Later on Monday DHS sent an additional statement. "Any allegation DHS and its components are attempting to 'squash' free speech is categorically FALSE," it reads.

    "Our law enforcement officers are on the frontlines arresting terrorists, gang members, murderers, child sex abusers, and rapists. They are experiencing coordinated campaigns of violence against them and facing a 1,300% increase in assaults against them, a 3,300% increase in vehicular attacks, and an 8,000% increase in death threats."

    NPR has not verified the statistics shared by DHS.

    "Anyone who assaults or threatens our law enforcement officers will face the consequences," the statement concludes.

    Adam Steinbaugh, senior attorney at FIRE, said in a statement the government's delayed response to Streever's January email undermines its investigation.

    "If someone is really threatening a government official, you don't wait five months to act on it," Steinbaugh said in the statement. "The fact that authorities didn't respond immediately shows that David presented no threat. This pursuit is designed to intimidate lawful speech, pure and simple."

    Poll worker given the same warning notice

    The lawsuit mentions that the same day HSI agents visited Streever's home on June 23, they also confronted Paigelynne Gonyea, a Syracuse resident who was working at a polling place for the New York primary election that day, about an Instagram post.

    While Gonyea was at Syracuse's Central Library working the polls, an HSI agent left her a voicemail that said the agents had just visited her former apartment and were calling "in reference to a post that we believe you made on Instagram where you doxxed an ICE agent back in January."

    Doxxing typically refers to releasing sensitive information about a person online.

    Gonyea called the agent back. She said the agents had wanted her to come outside the polling place to speak with them but she told NPR she did not trust them, and had told them to come talk to her inside the polling place when there was a lull in voters.

    Local election officials later said the federal agents should not have gone inside, given that police are not supposed to enter polling places unless there is an emergency and a recently enacted New York law bars federal immigration officers from voting sites.

    Video captured by fellow poll workers shows two agents with badges speaking with Gonyea inside the library and delivering a warning notice that said her Instagram account may have violated the law. Gonyea said the agents did not tell her which of her posts had prompted their visit but they had confirmed it was a post about Jonathan Ross, the ICE officer who fatally shot Renee Macklin Good in Minneapolis.

    Gonyea denied to NPR and other news outlets that she had ever doxxed Ross and had said she thought the agents were referring to a post she made that identified Ross by name after the Minnesota Star Tribune had reported it, and called for Ross to be indicted. That post is still visible on her Instagram account.

    But after NPR and other media outlets wrote about the encounter, DHS released a statement that said Gonyea "committed a federal crime by posting the address of an ICE law enforcement officer online." The statement continued, "Doxxing federal law enforcement officers is a federal crime that puts their lives and their families in serious danger…If you doxx our officers, we will investigate you, and you will be brought to justice."

    DHS did not respond to requests from NPR to provide evidence that Gonyea had doxxed Ross. But the department did share with the Associated Press a redacted screenshot taken from a cell phone of a different Instagram post that looks like it was posted from Gonyea's account.

    The post that was shown to AP is a photo of Ross with text that reads, "The killer's name is Jonathan Ross of" and the rest is redacted, presumably by DHS. The post does not currently appear on Gonyea's Instagram account. The screenshot shows it was taken six hours after the post went up but does not show a date.

    Gonyea told NPR she had the opportunity to review the screenshot of the post but she did not believe she had posted it.

    "Based on everything I know, I do not believe that I made that post, and I have no independent recollection of ever creating or publishing it," she told NPR in a text message.

    "There is additional context that I believe is important, and I look forward to addressing those matters through the appropriate process rather than in the press," she wrote.

    "What has not changed is my concern about the broader constitutional issues raised by my experience, including free speech, due process and government accountability."

    Steinbaugh from FIRE told NPR last week that a social media post that shares a person's address alone is not a criminal offense.

    "What the law criminalizes is publishing an address or sharing an address with the intent to convey a threat," Steinbaugh said. "So if you post an address and say, 'Hey, gang, at 5:00 tonight, we're going to all meet up here with our pitchforks and torches,' that puts you more in the ballpark of a threat."

    He said some social media posts that publicized Ross's address were in the context of a broader public debate about whether federal immigration officers can wear masks and refuse to identify themselves "and essentially [act] almost as a secret police." He said for that reason, some posts that shared information about Ross were a form of protest.

    "People might think that that is speech that people should not engage in, but it's still protected and it can't be criminalized," Steinbaugh said.

    Gonyea and Streever are the first two people who have made public that they received warning notices from Homeland Security agents about their online communications.
    Copyright 2026 NPR