Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Commissioners say the Biden-era rule was illegal
    A man in a suit sits at a long table in front of a microphone. He is surrounded by water bottles and b.ehind him are men and women also in suits
    Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew Ferguson testifies on Capitol Hill on May 15 in Washington, D.C.
    Topline:
    The Federal Trade Commission is moving to vacate its rule banning noncompete agreements, reversing what was seen as a signature accomplishment of the commission under President Joe Biden. The ban, championed by former FTC Chair Lina Khan, was finalized in 2024 but never took effect.

    What is a noncompete? Noncompetes are employment agreements that prevent workers from taking new jobs with a competing business or starting one of their own, usually within a certain geographic area and timeframe after leaving their job.

    Who is affected? The FTC has estimated that some 30 million people, or 1 in 5 American workers, from minimum wage earners to CEOs, are bound by noncompete agreements.

    What supporters of the ban say: Khan said because workers would be able to freely pursue new opportunities without the fear of being taken to court by their past employers, it could lead to increased wages totaling nearly $300 billion per year and the annual creation of 8,500 new businesses.

    What opponents say: Republican commissioners on the FTC at the time whoe voted against the rule argue that the FTC lacks the authority to issue a nationwide prohibition on a centuries-old business practice. In a written dissent, they called the ban "by far the most extraordinary assertion of authority in the Commission's history" and a violation of the Constitution.

    The Federal Trade Commission is moving to vacate its rule banning noncompete agreements, reversing what was seen as a signature accomplishment of the commission under President Joe Biden.

    Noncompetes are employment agreements that prevent workers from taking new jobs with a competing business or starting one of their own, usually within a certain geographic area and timeframe after leaving their job.

    The ban, championed by former FTC Chair Lina Khan, was finalized in 2024 but never took effect. Following a lawsuit brought by the Dallas-based tax services firm Ryan LLC, a federal judge in Texas found that the FTC had likely exceeded its authority in issuing the ban and halted it nationwide.

    Last fall, the Biden administration appealed that ruling to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. But in March, the Trump administration asked the court for a 120-day pause on the appeal. The government's attorneys cited the changeover in administration and comments made by new FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson that the agency should reconsider its defense of the rule.

    Then in July, the Trump administration told the court it needed still more time. The court approved another 60-day pause that was to end Sept. 8.

    Late Friday afternoon, just ahead of that deadline, the FTC announced it had voted 3-1 to dismiss the appeal and take steps to vacate the rule.

    "The Rule's illegality was patently obvious," wrote Ferguson in a joint statement with fellow Republican commissioner Melissa Holyoak. "It preempted the laws of all 50 states and actively displaced hundreds of existing laws across 46 states."

    The dissenting vote was cast by Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, whom Trump had tried to fire earlier this year. Now the lone Democrat on the commission, she returned to her seat Wednesday following a ruling from the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

    30 million people bound by noncompetes

    The FTC has estimated that some 30 million people, or 1 in 5 American workers, from minimum wage earners to CEOs, are bound by noncompete agreements.

    The agency's rule, narrowly approved by the commission along party lines in April 2024, would have invalidated nearly all existing noncompetes and banned new ones except in rare circumstances. Khan said because workers would be able to freely pursue new opportunities without the fear of being taken to court by their past employers, it could lead to increased wages totaling nearly $300 billion per year and the annual creation of 8,500 new businesses.

    From the business community, there was immediate pushback. In its lawsuit, Ryan LLC argued that the noncompete ban would inflict irreparable harm by enabling its employees to leave for the competition, potentially taking with them valuable skills and information gained on the job. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which joined Ryan's lawsuit, argued that the rule constituted an unlawful overreach of the FTC's authority and warned it would harm the economy.

    Ferguson, one of two Republican commissioners on the FTC at the time, voted against the rule, arguing that the FTC lacked the authority to issue a nationwide prohibition on a centuries-old business practice. In his written dissent, he called the ban "by far the most extraordinary assertion of authority in the Commission's history" and a violation of the Constitution.

    Still, since becoming FTC chair under Trump, Ferguson has made clear he's no fan of noncompete agreements.

    "Noncompete agreements can be pernicious," he wrote in his statement released Friday. "They can be, and sometimes are, abused to the effect of severely inhibiting workers' ability to make a living."

    Earlier this year, Ferguson told Fox Business that one of his top priorities would be, instead of a blanket ban, to send FTC enforcers out looking for noncompetes and no-poach agreements that violate the Sherman Act, the 1890 law prohibiting activities that restrict competition in the marketplace.

    On Thursday, the FTC gave an example of the type of enforcement it now plans to pursue. The commission announced it had ordered the country's largest pet cremation business to stop enforcing noncompetes against its nearly 1,800 employees.

    While acknowledging that kind of enforcement is important, Slaughter says it's no substitute for a nationwide rule.

    "It does nothing to help the person working at the hair salon in Minnesota, or the engineer in Florida, or the fast food worker in Washington," she says. "Those people deserve protection too."

    The FTC this week also invited the public to come forward with information to help the commission "better understand the scope, prevalence, and effects of employer noncompete agreements, as well as to gather information to inform possible future enforcement actions," according to a press release.

    Slaughter points out that during the rulemaking process, the FTC received 26,000 public comments on noncompetes, almost entirely in support of a nationwide ban.

    An architect of the noncompete rule warns the enforcement strategy will fail

    Elizabeth Wilkins, Khan's former chief of staff and one of the architects of the FTC's noncompete rule, predicts Ferguson's plan for going after noncompetes using agency enforcers will prove woefully insufficient.

    "The FTC has something like 1,400 employees to police the entire economy — not just workers, not just labor markets, but everything," says Wilkins, who is now president and CEO of the left-leaning Roosevelt Institute.

    Wilkins notes that even in states that have passed their own laws making noncompete agreements unenforceable, companies are still using them.

    "You find them almost as often as you do in states where they are enforceable, which is to say workers don't know their rights," says Wilkins. "A clear and simple ban on noncompetes is, to my mind, the only way to truly protect workers."

    A noncompete at a real estate company presents a hard choice

    In Grand Junction, Colo., Rebecca Denton signed a noncompete when she took a job as a transaction coordinator with a real estate company in 2019.

    Finding herself overworked during the pandemic-era surge in housing sales, she wanted to quit her job, which involved handling all the paperwork for closings. But there was a problem. Because of her noncompete, she knew she wouldn't be able to do similar work in a three-state area for a year.

    "You feel trapped," says Denton. "Shackled with a ball and chain."

    Denton, who was 52 at the time, weighed her options. She decided on what she considered the lesser of two evils: Rather than remaining in a job that was running her into the ground with 16-hour days, she quit. She took on lower-paying gig work for a year, steering clear of the line of work in which she has expertise. She feels lucky to have had the financial resources to make that choice, a luxury she says many of her friends in real estate don't have.

    In 2022, Colorado enacted a law significantly limiting the use of noncompetes. Denton was pleased and says she knows people who were able to leave their jobs as a result. She hopes the law will encourage employers to find other ways to retain workers.

    "If you're a good company, and you are paying your employees at scale or better, and you're treating them well, you have nothing to fear of them leaving," Denton says. "You don't need a noncompete because they're going to happily stay right there."

  • Sound of lightning picked up by rover microphone

    Topline:

    Mini-lightning strikes created by whirling dust devils on Mars have been detected accidentally by the microphone on board the Perseverance rover.

    The context: The chance discovery is direct evidence of a form of lightning on Mars, researchers say in a report published in Nature. They describe how the rover's microphone picked up signs of electrical arcs just a few centimeters long, which were accompanied by audible shockwaves.
    Why it matters: "There's been a very big mystery about lightning on Mars for a long time. It's probably one of the biggest mysteries about Mars," says Daniel Mitchard, a lightning researcher at Cardiff University in the United Kingdom, who wasn't part of the research team but wrote an accompanying commentary for the journal.
    The background: Besides Earth, flashes of lightning have been seen in the atmospheres of Jupiter and Saturn, and lightning has also been detected on Neptune and Uranus. But finding lightning has proven more elusive on our closest planetary neighbors — even though experimenters in the 1970s did lab work that suggested lightning should exist on Mars.

    Read on ... to learn how scientists tested their theory

    Mini-lightning strikes created by whirling dust devils on Mars have been detected accidentally by the microphone on board the Perseverance rover.

    The chance discovery is direct evidence of a form of lightning on Mars, researchers say in a report published in Nature. They describe how the rover's microphone picked up signs of electrical arcs just a few centimeters long, which were accompanied by audible shockwaves.

    "There's been a very big mystery about lightning on Mars for a long time. It's probably one of the biggest mysteries about Mars," says Daniel Mitchard, a lightning researcher at Cardiff University in the United Kingdom, who wasn't part of the research team but wrote an accompanying commentary for the journal.

    "The key thing here," he explains, "is that we actually have a rover on the surface of Mars that appears to have detected something that fits our idea of what we think lightning on Mars would look like."

    Besides Earth, flashes of lightning have been seen in the atmospheres of Jupiter and Saturn, and lightning has also been detected on Neptune and Uranus. But finding lightning has proven more elusive on our closest planetary neighbors — even though experimenters in the 1970s did lab work that suggested lightning should exist on Mars.

    For example, when researchers put volcanic sand into a flask and pumped it down to Martian atmospheric pressures, swirling the sand in the flask created a glow that could be seen in the dark, says Ralph Lorenz, a planetary scientist with the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.

    The glow came from electrical charges caused by the friction between the bits of sand. If you had a bigger buildup of electric charge, he says, that could produce a more sudden discharge, like what happens with spark plugs in a car, or on a larger scale, lightning. After all, even on Earth, lightning can occur in turbulent clouds of volcanic ash.

    "So there's no reason that blowing dust or sand on Mars shouldn't become electrically charged," says Lorenz.

    Recently, he and some colleagues were reviewing audio picked up by the Perseverance rover, a car-size robot that's been trundling around the Red Planet since 2021. It's got a microphone, and a few years ago scientists reported hearing the sounds of a whirling dust devil passing over the rover.

    Besides the wind and the hiss of the dust, Lorenz says, there was a brief sound of a snap or crack in the middle of the encounter. "We just assumed it was a big sand grain or a small gravel grain just, you know, hitting the structure," he says.

    But not too long later, one of their team members attended a science conference and heard a talk about atmospheric electricity. "I thought that if there were discharges, we could hear them. And then, I remembered this recording," says Baptiste Chide, who is with the Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie in Toulouse, France.

    So he did some experiments here on Earth, using an electrostatic generator, to see how electric discharges would affect the microphone. What he saw was the same signals that had been captured on Mars; there was a distinctive pattern of a brief electrical interference followed by the acoustic signal of a shockwave.

    Fifty-five such events were picked up by the microphone over two Martian years, the researchers say, and the sparks were usually associated with dust devils and the fronts of dust storms.

    The electrical arcs would feel and sound like strong static electricity sparks, says Chide. If an astronaut was on Mars, it might be possible to see them, although "small discharges are hard to see in strong sunshine, and it's the sunniest times of day that have most dust devils and maybe most of the strong discharge events. That said, some events were at night," he says.

    The researchers think it's important to study this atmospheric electrical activity to understand the hazards it could pose to future robotic or human missions. While most space hardware is designed to be robust, they note that the Soviet Mars 3 mission landed during a dust storm and only operated for about 20 seconds on the surface before suddenly and mysteriously ending its transmission.

    "Something changed in 20 seconds," says Lorenz. "Could it have been an electrical discharge event? I don't think we can rule that out."

    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Sponsor
  • New analysis pegs origins to much earlier time
    Modern dogs come in all shapes and sizes. A new study finds they started evolving much of that physical diversity thousands of years ago.

    Topline:

    A new analysis of hundreds of prehistoric canine skulls, spanning the last 50,000 years, shows the vast range in physical attributes of dogs emerged much earlier than previously thought.

    Why now? The results of new study, published in the journal Science, show that by nearly 11,000 years ago, just after the last ice age, dog skulls were already different from those of wolves. They were shorter and wider. But perhaps more surprising is that the dog skulls were already different from each other, meaning that the switch from wolf to dog had to have happened much earlier.

    The science: To determine when those changes happened, a team of international researchers created 3D models of 643 skulls of ancient and modern dogs and wolves. The models allowed them to discern subtle changes in the skulls' shape over time.

    The context: Until now, it's been commonly believed that the vast range in physical attributes of dogs is a product of the Victorian era, when kennel clubs started selectively breeding dogs to produce certain characteristics roughly 200 years ago.

    Read on ... to learn more about new research into the domestication of dogs.

    You don't have to walk by a dog park to know that domestic dogs come in all shapes and sizes. From 2-pound Chihuahuas to 150-pound Newfoundlands, chunky Labradors to slender Vizlas, our canine companions are some of the most physically diverse mammals on the planet.

    It's commonly believed that this vast range in physical attributes is a product of the Victorian era, when kennel clubs started selectively breeding dogs to produce certain characteristics roughly 200 years ago.

    A new analysis of hundreds of prehistoric canine skulls, spanning the last 50,000 years, shows it emerged much earlier.

    "By about 10,000 years ago, half of the amount of diversity present in modern dogs was already present in the Neolithic," said Carly Ameen, a bioarchaeologist at the University of Exeter and one of the lead authors on the new study. "So very early on in our relationship with dogs, we not only change them from wolves but they begin to change amongst themselves and generate a lot of diversity."

    To determine when those changes happened, Ameen and a team of international researchers created 3D models of 643 skulls of ancient and modern dogs and wolves. The models allowed them to discern subtle changes in the skulls' shape over time.
    The results, published in the journal Science, show that by nearly 11,000 years ago, just after the last ice age, dog skulls were already different from those of wolves. They were shorter and wider. But perhaps more surprising, Ameen said, is that the dog skulls were already different from each other, meaning that the switch from wolf to dog had to have happened much earlier.

    "The relationship between wolves and dogs had to already have been ongoing," she said. "It's not an instantaneous change — the dog comes from the woods into your house and changes the shape of its skull."
    Those kinds of changes typically accumulate slowly, over many generations.

    Scientists have long wondered when the domestication of dogs first started. Dogs are believed to be the first domesticated species — before cows, pigs, sheep, or plants like wheat.

    The new study doesn't answer the question but "it narrows the window," Ameen said, and gives us insights into how humanity's mutually beneficial relationship with dogs physically changed them over time.

    That relationship was the focus of another new study, published in Science, that used ancient DNA from dogs to find that humans were traveling with — and even trading — domestic dogs in Eurasia for at least the last 10,000 years.
    The study's lead author, Minmin Ma, a researcher at Lanzhou University in China, said it makes sense that prehistoric hunter-gatherers were bringing dogs with them during migrations because they could assist with hunting.
    But for prehistoric farming and pastoral societies that raised animals like cattle, sheep and horses, "dogs weren't particularly essential in that economic sense," she said. And yet, their study found that those groups made the effort to bring dogs with them during migrations too.

    "Although the roles [dogs have] played varied across different periods, they have consistently been close companions to humans," Ma said. "We should cherish this bond even more."
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • East LA Youth Orchestra reinstated after uproar
    A conductor stands in front of an orchestra of young people. In the background is a screen that reads "YOLA Bowl 2025. Forever Summer."
    Students from the Youth Orchestra Los Angeles perform at a concert in 2023.

    Topline:

    The LA Phil on Wednesday said it secured new donor funding that would allow it to fully continue the Youth Orchestra Los Angeles program at Esteban E. Torres High School in East LA, just days after community outcry and Boyle Heights Beat reported that programming at YOLA’s Torres site would be reduced.

    From LA Phil: “YOLA is fundamental to the LA Phil’s mission of sharing the transformative power of music, so we are thrilled our donors recognized that this funding provides vital access to music education for the East LA community,” Kim Noltemy, president and chief executive officer of the LA Phil, said in a statement.

    Community response: In response to cuts, families and community members held meetings and launched a campaign on Instagram, urging the LA Phil to save the program at Torres.

    Read on... for what YOLA means to East LA students and families.

    This story was originally published by Boyle Heights Beat on Nov. 26, 2025.

    The LA Phil on Wednesday said it secured new donor funding that would allow it to fully continue the Youth Orchestra Los Angeles program at Esteban E. Torres High School in East LA, just days after community outcry and Boyle Heights Beat reported that programming at YOLA’s Torres site would be reduced.

    “YOLA is fundamental to the LA Phil’s mission of sharing the transformative power of music, so we are thrilled our donors recognized that this funding provides vital access to music education for the East LA community,” said Kim Noltemy, president and chief executive officer of the LA Phil, in a statement.

    “Joining together, we have and will continue working tirelessly over the coming months to ensure we remain in a position to support this program, because it is more important than ever,” Noltemy added.

    Programming was set to take place through Dec. 12, with orchestra rehearsals scaled back from four to two days per week. Parents said cuts at Torres involved beginner programs. They were also told that all instructors at the Torres site would be removed except for the conductors.

    In response, families and community members held meetings and launched a campaign on Instagram, urging the LA Phil to save the program at Torres.

    In a press release, parents noted that cuts come at a time when communities like East LA are grappling with fear and instability due to immigration raids that began over the summer. YOLA, they said, has been a safe space. They emphasized that no other YOLA site in LA “is being cut or reduced due to ‘funding.’”

    “Only Torres — the site serving East LA’s predominantly Latino community — is affected,” they said in the release.

    A young person holds a sign that reads "Musicos. Si. Capitalismo. No." which translates to "Musicians. Yes. Capitalism. No." There are youth standing and talking amongst one another in front of small lockers.
    Students and parents share their concerns about cuts to YOLA programming at a meeting Wednesday at Esteban E. Torres High School.
    (
    Courtesy of YOLA Torres community
    )

    The announcement of programming reduction comes as staff at all YOLA sites filed for union representation with the American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, according to the YOLA United Teaching Artists Instagram page.

    YOLA, which was founded by the LA Phil, provides free instruments and ensemble training for thousands of young musicians who are 5 through 18 years old. The after-school program operates at sites across LA, including in Inglewood, Rampart District and Rampart/MacArthur Park. YOLA at Torres serves 165 students who attend East LA area schools, such as James A. Garfield High School and KIPP charter schools.

    In the statement, the LA Phil said its board is working to “ensure the program is positioned for lasting success.”

    “We will evaluate whether Torres remains the best and most sustainable location for YOLA programming after this school year,” the statement read.

    The LA Phil also said it is establishing a parent advisory committee “to maintain consistent dialogue with YOLA families as future decisions are made.”

    “We know how difficult and disruptive the initial decision to reduce the YOLA program at Torres has been for students, families, and teaching artists, and we are deeply apologetic,” Noltemy said in the statement. “We are profoundly grateful to the generous donors who made it possible for us to continue this essential program.”

  • City’s old residential hotels are losing money
    A wide shot of a thick, stocky block of a building that's actually a hotel.
    The Barclay Hotel in 2005.

    Topline:

    Often described as housing of last resort for some of the city’s poorest renters, single-room occupancy buildings in Los Angeles are operating at a financial loss — and losing more money every year.

    The source: That’s according to a November report from Enterprise Community Partners, an affordable housing nonprofit. The report surveyed 39 buildings across California. It found that only two — both located in San Francisco — have positive cash flow. All of the Los Angeles properties are run by organizations that keep buildings afloat by digging into their own budgets, making up for rental income that isn’t enough to cover operating costs.

    The housing: The buildings surveyed in the report contained more than 3,000 single-room occupancy units in total. These are bare-bones apartments, usually just a bedroom without a private bathroom or kitchens. Many are located in old residential hotels, often in L.A.’s Skid Row neighborhood.

    The context: The report found building owners have needed to triple the amount of money they’re advancing per unit over the last five years. Losses cost organizations an average of $971 per unit in 2020. Now, that figure is up to $2,866 per unit.

    Read on… to learn about a solution in San Francisco that could help in L.A.

    Often described as housing of last resort for some of the city’s poorest renters, single-room occupancy buildings in Los Angeles are operating at a financial loss — and losing more money every year.

    That’s according to a November report from Enterprise Community Partners, an affordable housing nonprofit. The report surveyed 39 buildings across California. It found that only two — both located in San Francisco — have positive cash flow.

    All of the L.A.-area properties are run by organizations that keep buildings financially afloat by digging into their own budgets, making up for rental income that isn’t enough to cover operating costs.

    “Owners that are carrying these properties are really trying to make them work,” said Marc Tousignant, who oversees vulnerable populations for Enterprise’s Southern California market. “They're really at the front lines of ending homelessness.”

    Losses have tripled

    The buildings surveyed in the report contained more than 3,000 single-room occupancy units in total. These are bare-bones apartments, usually just a bedroom without a private bathroom or kitchen.

    Many are located in old residential hotels, often in downtown L.A.’s Skid Row neighborhood.

    The report found building owners have needed to triple the amount of money they’re advancing per unit over the last five years. Losses cost organizations an average of $971 per unit in 2020. Now, that figure is up to $2,866 per unit.

    Some, like the storied Cecil Hotel, have struggled to attract tenants. The report found an average vacancy rate of 20% in the surveyed buildings. Some of the aging properties are unattractive to prospective tenants because of deferred maintenance or damage caused by residents with untreated mental health issues.

    “There have been discussions around, should we just abandon this model and convert them completely?” Tousignant said. “But they are really serving, I think, an important role.”

    What could turn them around?

    The two buildings in San Francisco that are financially healthy both have project-based vouchers through the city’s Section 8 program. These vouchers help tenants pay for rents in the building, and the vouchers cannot be transferred to other properties.

    Tousignant said this approach could help improve the financial outlook for buildings in L.A.

    “Unfortunately, in L.A., we haven't really been dedicating any new project-based vouchers to older or existing buildings,” he said. “They've really been going towards newer buildings.”

    Rehabilitation is another approach that could improve vacancy rates at the buildings. The estimated cost of fixing up each single-room occupancy unit was $165,000 on average, according to the report. Some of those plans could involve converting units into studio apartments, complete with kitchen and bathroom facilities — though that could involve reducing a building’s total number of units.

    “It's this sort of trade off,” Tousignant said. “What's more important? Making these complete units or losing a little bit of affordability in terms of the amount of units?”

    Tousignant said if the affordable housing field doesn’t find solutions to these problems, more buildings could find themselves in court-ordered receivership, with tenants facing an uncertain future.

    That’s the situation the Skid Row Housing Trust found itself in, before developer Leo Pustilnikov bought its troubled portfolio of buildings.