Federal officials have approved another generic version of the abortion pill mifepristone, a regulatory formality that quickly triggered pushback from anti-abortion groups and politicians aligned with the Trump administration.
What the drugmaker is saying: Drugmaker Evita Solutions announced on its website that the Food and Drug Administration signed off on its low-cost form of the pill, which is approved to end pregnancies through 10 weeks. On its website, Evita states that it "believes that all people should have access to safe, affordable, high-quality, effective, and compassionate abortion care."
What opponents are saying: Students for Life Action, which opposes abortion, in a statement Thursday called the approval "a stain on the Trump presidency and another sign that the deep state at the FDA must go." Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri also criticized the move in a post on X, stating, "I have lost confidence in the leadership at FDA."
Read on ... for more on the history of this particular pill and the FDA's place in drug approvals.
WASHINGTON — Federal officials have approved another generic version of the abortion pill mifepristone, a regulatory formality that quickly triggered pushback from anti-abortion groups and politicians aligned with the Trump administration.
Drugmaker Evita Solutions announced on its website that the Food and Drug Administration signed off on its low-cost form of the pill, which is approved to end pregnancies through 10 weeks.
Students for Life Action, which opposes abortion, in a statement Thursday called the approval "a stain on the Trump presidency and another sign that the deep state at the FDA must go."
Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri also criticized the move in a post on X, stating, "I have lost confidence in the leadership at FDA."
A spokesperson for the agency said the FDA "has very limited discretion in deciding whether to approve a generic drug" and added that FDA officials do not "endorse any product."
The criticism comes as Republican President Donald Trump's top health officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., face growing pressure from abortion opponents to reevaluate mifepristone, which was approved 25 years ago and has repeatedly been deemed safe and effective by FDA scientists.
In a letter to Republican attorneys general last month, Kennedy and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary pledged to conduct a full review of the drug's safety.
Under Makary and Kennedy, the FDA has repeatedly delayed decisions on vaccines, ultimately narrowing the terms of approval for this year's COVID-19 shots. That type of political intervention was previously highly unusual at the FDA, where career scientists typically make such decisions.
The FDA approved the original version of mifepristone in 2000 and gradually eased access over time. That included approving the first generic pill, from drugmaker GenBioPro, in 2019.
In 2021, the FDA under Democratic President Joe Biden permitted online prescribing and mail-order delivery of the drug, greatly expanding access. Abortion opponents have been fighting the change ever since.
Approval of generic drugs is typically a rote process at the FDA, with multiple copycat versions usually approved after the patent on the original drug expires. In most cases, generic drugmakers only need to show that their drug matches the ingredients and formula used in the original medication.
"This is exactly how our system is supposed to work, and it has worked this way for decades," said Mini Timmaraju of Reproductive Freedom for All. "Career scientists and civil servants at the FDA did their jobs."
The FDA typically approves such applications within 10 months. But filing documents posted to the FDA's website show that Evita Solutions filed its application to market mifepristone four years ago.
On its website, Evita states that it "believes that all people should have access to safe, affordable, high-quality, effective and compassionate abortion care."
The company said in an email that the drug is expected to launch in January of next year.
Approval of a second generic is unlikely to affect access to the pill, which is typically taken with another drug, misoprostol. The combination accounts for roughly two-thirds of all U.S. abortions. Mifepristone dilates the cervix and blocks the hormone progesterone, while misoprostol causes the uterus to cramp and contract.
Access to mifepristone is restricted across large sections of the country because of state laws that ban abortion — including medication abortion — or impose separate restrictions on the drug's use. Those laws are subject to a number of ongoing lawsuits that are winding their way through the legal system.
Restrictions on the pill are not supported by most major medical societies, including the American Medical Association.
East L.A. is the most populous unincorporated community in the state. Here’s what that means and how it affects its nearly 119,000 residents.
Why it matters: East L.A. is not a city, and it’s not part of the city of L.A.. Instead, it’s an unincorporated part of L.A. County, and even though it’s the most populous unincorporated area in California, community organizers say many residents are unaware of the problems that raises.
What is an unincorporated community? An unincorporated area is land within a county that has not been designated to be a city, meaning that it relies on county services, including for law enforcement, public works and local government. Instead of being governed by a city council and a mayor, major decisions for East L.A. residents fall under the authority of the L.A. County Board of Supervisors.
Read on ... for more on what it means to be unincorporated and residents can make their voices heard.
This story was originally published by Boyle Heights Beat on Feb. 24, 2026.
East Los Angeles is home to nearly 119,000 residents, but the community has no mayor or city hall.
So who makes decisions? Who fixes potholes? Who gets called to report illegal dumping?
East L.A. is not a city, and it’s not part of the city of L.A. Instead, it’s an unincorporated part of L.A. County, and even though it’s the most populous unincorporated area in California, community organizers say many residents are unaware of the problems that raises.
According to the L.A. County Planning Department, there are approximately 120 to 125 unincorporated areas in the county, which altogether represent two-thirds of its total area and one-tenth of its population.
“For the 1 million people living in these areas, the Board of Supervisors is their ‘city council’ and the supervisor representing the area is their ‘mayor,’” the department website says.
So what does it mean to live in an unincorporated community?
Let’s break it down:
What is an unincorporated community?
An unincorporated area is land within a county that has not been designated to be a city, meaning that it relies on county services, including for law enforcement, public works and local government.
Instead of being governed by a city council and a mayor, major decisions for East L.A. residents fall under the authority of the L.A. County Board of Supervisors.
East L.A. residents have called for representation that’s more closely tied to their community and financial transparency, saying they want to know how their tax dollars are spent locally.
Who represents East LA?
East L.A., located in Supervisorial District 1, has been represented by County Supervisor Hilda Solis since 2014. Her term is set to end this year.
Solis also makes decisions for the nearly 2 million other residents who live in District 1, which covers more than 20 cities, stretching from Silver Lake to Pomona, as well as various neighborhoods of the city of Los Angeles, including Boyle Heights and downtown.
Independent cities often provide residents with their own municipal services such as law enforcement, firefighting, animal control, trash collection, road maintenance, library services and parks.
Here’s a list of services available to East L.A. residents:
First District Field Office – East Los Angeles
Services: Here’s how you can get in touch with Solis’ office if you have questions or concerns.
Location: 4801 E. Third St., Los Angeles
Contact: (323) 881-4601
East LA Sheriff’s Station
Services: In addition to serving East L.A., the station also serves the cities of Commerce, Cudahy and Maywood, as well as unincorporated Belvedere Gardens, City Terrace, Eastmont, Saybrook Park and Union Pacific.
Location: 5019 E. Third St., East Los Angeles
Contact: (323) 264-4151. For emergencies, call 911.
Services: The L.A. County Fire Department serves all of the unincorporated area within Los Angeles County, as well as 60 incorporated cities, 59 of which are in Los Angeles County and one in Orange County.
Contact: (323) 881-2411. For emergencies, call 911.
Services: L.A. County Public Works responds to calls about graffiti, potholes, illegal dumping, homeless encampments, transportation services and building and safety permits, among other things.
Contact: Reports can be submitted online. Urgent requests can be made by calling the 24-hour line at (800) 675-4357.
Services: 211 L.A. County provides health and social service resources, including housing support, mental health care, financial assistance and recovery resources. During disasters, like wildfires and other crises, the line provides real-time information and can help people find shelter, food, financial help and emotional support.
Contact: Dial 211. Those unable to reach 2-1-1 service can call (800) 339-6993. TTY/TDD# (phone for hearing impaired): (800) 660-4026
For a full list, check out this guide to unincorporated areas services for District 1.
Why isn’t East LA its own city?
Over the decades, multiple efforts to incorporate East LA into a city have failed. A recent fiscal analysis concluded that cityhood remains financially unviable for the region. Residents have continued their calls for more financial transparency and better representation. A new effort on the horizon may allow citizens to directly advise the county on issues unique to East LA.
How can residents make their voices heard?
The report that deemed cityhood unfeasible for unincorporated East LA last year recommended the formation of a Municipal Advisory Council (MAC) — a formal, citizen-led body that would provide residents with a structure for public input and give stakeholders a direct line of communication to county leadership.
At the first of six community forums on Saturday, Feb. 21, some residents deemed the MAC a stepping stone towards proper incorporation down the line. Others asked for better economic investment and access to a localized, itemized budget every year for residents to understand how their tax dollars are spent on improving social services and local businesses.
“Every problem we have, can be solved if we have a local government,” resident Francisco Cardenas. “We have nobody to complain to.”
Here’s everything you need to know about the MAC and the upcoming community forums where residents are invited to weigh in. The next meeting will take place Thursday at East L.A. Library, located at 4837 E. Third St. Register here.
Reporting for this story came from notes taken by Andrew Lopez, a Boyle Heights Beat contributor and Los Angeles Documenter, at the East LA MAC community forum on Feb. 21. The LA Documenters program trains and pays community members to document what happens at public meetings. Check out the meeting notes and audio on Documenters.org.
Gillian Morán Pérez
is an associate producer for LAist’s early All Things Considered show.
Published February 24, 2026 2:40 PM
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, right, and then-Fire Chief Kristin Crowley, left, address the media on Jan. 11, 2025.
(
Allen J. Schaben
/
Getty Images
)
Topline:
Former L.A. Fire Department Chief Kristin Crowley is suing the city of L.A., alleging that her removal after the Palisades Fire was retaliatory.
The background: L.A.Mayor KarenBass removed Crowley from her role as chief in February 2025, saying that Crowley had failed to deploy enough firefighters before the Palisades Fire started. Last summer, Crowley filed a claim against the city of L.A. and Bass in which she alleged defamation and that the mayor had thrown her under the bus after the fires.
What the lawsuit says: The lawsuit, filed Friday, accuses Bass of “orchestrating a campaign of retaliation to conceal the extent to which Bass undermined public safety and transparency.”
Crowley also criticized the mayor’s handling of last year’s fire, saying the mayor ignored repeated warnings about the risks posed by LAFD’s “worsening resource and staffing crisis” and instead further cut the department’s budget. She claims that Bass retaliated against her by removing her as fire chief and relegating her to a lower position in the department following comments Crowley made publicly about the LAFD being underfunded.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and “accountability for Bass’ calculated efforts to punish a dedicated LAFD civil servant for exposing the truth, and for choosing the safety of the city and its firefighters over the interests of Bass and her cover-up.”.
The mayor’s response: “There is nothing new here,” said Yusef Robb, senior advisor to Bass, in a statement. “Ms. Crowley was removed from her post for her failure to predeploy and her decision to send 1,000 firefighters home instead of keeping them on duty on the morning the fires broke out. This lawsuit has no merit.”
Go deeper: For more on the fallout between Mayor Bass and Kristen Crowley over the city's response to the Palisades Fire, listen to this episode of LAist's podcast "Imperfect Paradise."
Keep up with LAist.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
Cato Hernández
covers important issues that affect the everyday lives of Southern Californians.
Published February 24, 2026 2:25 PM
In L.A. County, one emergency room visit a year can increase your risk for medical debt.
(
Mario Tama
/
Getty Images
)
Topline:
One in nine Angelenos experience medical debt in L.A. County, almost a million people. For the past two years, L.A. County has been working with a nonprofit, Undue Medical Debt, to help struggling residents by abolishing unpaid medical bills. We look at one person’s struggle with medical debt at a young age, and how she learned her bill got erased.
How did this start? Long Beach resident Alexy Cordova got into a car crash when she was just 16 years old. She needed multiple surgeries, and over the years her emergency visits continued because of constant pain. The visits created a mountain of medical bills that went into collections.
Erasing the debt: One of her bills — a charge for $2,200 dollars — has been erased. That happened through a county pilot program with the nonprofit Undue Medical Debt, which buys the debt for pennies on the dollar.
What she’s learned: She says knowing that the bill is gone has been a big relief. She encourages others to do what she does now: get an itemized list and negotiate your bill.
Read on…. to learn more about her journey.
Medical debt affects 1 in 9 Los Angeles County residents — almost a million people — according to the county health department. It’s a financial burden Long Beach resident Alexy Cordova learned about at a young age.
When she was 16 years old, Cordova was in a car crash that resulted in multiple surgeries on her spine and intestines. But over the years, her pain kept coming back to the point where she was constantly in the emergency room.
Despite having health insurance, those visits led to medical bills which piled up, including one for $2,200 in 2020.
Getting the relief
For Cordova, who’s now 25, living with that debt was a heavy burden. She wanted to pay it off, but she was young, and with a minimum wage job, it was hard to save and focus on her education at the same time.
“You want to pay this, but you have all these other bills,” Cordova said. “What comes first? Obviously not medical debt. I mean, not to me. I’m going to be honest.”
Many of the bills went into collections. Recently, she paid a repair service to help take care of them — but then she received a letter in the mail. She almost assumed it was another bill, but when she opened it, she realized it was something else entirely.
It was a notice telling her that $2,200 of her debt was being paid off by an L.A. County pilot program, which uses the nonprofit Undue Medical Debt to buy medical debt for pennies on the dollar. Cordova was happy to see it.
Alexy Cordova works as a legal assistant while she pursues a degree in criminal Justice.
(
Courtesy Alexy Cordova
)
“ I definitely felt relieved,” she said. “Knowing that I have a bill really does stress me out, and it adds to everything that I have going on.”
So far, L.A. County’s pilot program has abolished more than $363 million in unpaid medical bills, for 170,000 residents.
You can’t apply for the relief; instead the program works with certain hospitals and healthcare providers to identify debts eligible for the program.
The debt problem
Unpaid medical bills are very common and often out of people’s control.
Certain factors can increase your risk. County public health data shows that visiting an emergency room just once a year makes you twice as likely to face medical debt. It also disproportionally affects lower-income households and Latino and Black patients.
Cordova says her situation happened because she wasn’t getting the right help at those emergency room visits, and doctors weren’t telling her where to go next. She ended up finding a specialist at the recommendation of her mother, a step that finally reduced her pain.
Cordova has learned from her debt experience and has some suggestions: Ask for itemized bills any time you get charged for care, so you can see what you’re being asked to pay for, and negotiate your bill.
“ If you don’t understand a charge, look into it. If you feel like it’s excessive, say something. I didn’t know that when I was younger,” she said.
More medical debt relief is on the way for L.A. County residents. According to an Undue spokesperson, they have about half of the current contract still to spend for the pilot program.
Oscar Deleon Jr., a student and Rapid Rehousing beneficiary, sits outside the Meriam Library at Chico State.
(
Salvador Ochoa
/
CalMatters
)
Topline:
Since the program launched in 2020, the College Focused Rapid Rehousing program has helped over 9,000 students facing housing insecurity or homelessness. Through partnering with local community-based organizations, Rapid Rehousing provides students with emergency housing, rental subsidies, case management and advising.
The context: Rapid Rehousing operates at all 10 University of California campuses, 25 community colleges and 18 California State University campuses. Students in the program reported higher GPAs and improved mental health and nutrition, according to an evaluation of the program in 2025 by the Center for Equitable Higher Education at Cal State Long Beach. As of 2025, California spends $31 million annually on Rapid Rehousing programs in higher education. The governor’s proposed budget for 2026-27, released in January, also includes $31 million.
The background: Following the 2018 Camp Fire in Northern California, Butte County lost over a third of its housing stock, impacting students at Chico State. But students everywhere were having a hard time finding affordable housing. In 2018, 10.9% of 27,805 students surveyed across the Cal State system reported they had experienced homelessness in a Student Basic Needs survey commissioned by the chancellor’s office. In a separate survey of California community college students, 19% of nearly 40,000 respondents had experienced homelessness between 2016 and 2018.
Initial aid: In response, the state Legislature included $10 million for a rapid rehousing pilot program in the state Budget Act of 2019, with $3.5 million going to UCs and $6.5 million to Cal States. Universities applied within their systems to receive grants to participate.
Read on... for more on who the program has helped.
Nineteen hours after leaving Coachella Valley, Oscar Deleon Jr. stepped off a bus with four bags of clothes, $800, admission to Chico State University, and no idea where he was going to live or work. All he knew was that he was taking his agriculture professor’s advice from College of the Desert and transferring to a university to continue his education.
He checked into a hotel. Two days later, at orientation, he learned about the Rapid Rehousing program at Chico State. The program’s community partner, True North Housing Alliance, a nonprofit that addresses homelessness in Butte County, paid for Deleon’s hotel bill. The university transferred Deleon to student housing for the school year and helped him secure financial aid to cover most of the cost.
“When I needed somewhere to go, they were willing to help me out, no questions asked. ‘Let’s get you situated,’ you know? You don’t forget that kind of help,” Deleon said.
Since the program launched in 2020, the College Focused Rapid Rehousing program has helped over 9,000 students facing housing insecurity or homelessness. Through partnering with local community-based organizations, Rapid Rehousing provides students with emergency housing, rental subsidies, case management and advising.
Rapid Rehousing operates at all 10 University of California campuses, 25 community colleges and 18 California State University campuses. Students in the program reported higher GPAs and improved mental health and nutrition, according to an evaluation of the program in 2025 by the Center for Equitable Higher Education at Cal State Long Beach. As of 2025, California spends $31 million annually on Rapid Rehousing programs in higher education. The governor’s proposed budget for 2026-27, released in January, also includes $31 million.
Rapid Rehousing came to the rescue
Following the 2018 Camp Fire in Northern California, Butte County lost over a third of its housing stock, impacting students at Chico State.
“A whole town was lost of housing,” said Emma Jewett, the senior basic needs case manager at Chico State. “Our students are often struggling to get housing and find sustainable housing as it is, because they don’t have the qualifying factors, such as making three times the rent.”
But students everywhere were having a hard time finding affordable housing. In 2018, 10.9% of 27,805 students surveyed across the Cal State system reported they had experienced homelessness in a Student Basic Needs survey commissioned by the chancellor’s office. In a separate survey of California community college students, 19% of nearly 40,000 respondents had experienced homelessness between 2016 and 2018.
Meanwhile, off-campus housing costs across the state increased by more than 30% between 2018 and 2022, according to California Competes, a research organization focused on higher education and workforce issues.
In response, the state Legislature included $10 million for a rapid rehousing pilot program in the state Budget Act of 2019, with $3.5 million going to UCs and $6.5 million to Cal States. Universities applied within their systems to receive grants to participate.
Left to right, Emma Jewett and Leah Slem, staff leaders of the Basic Needs Center at Chico State, stand inside a Rapid Rehousing home in Chico on Feb. 5, 2026.
(
Salvador Ochoa
/
CalMatters
)
Chico State was one of the Cal State campuses initially awarded funds in 2020, alongside Long Beach, Pomona, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, and San José. The state expanded the program to include Northridge in 2021. All UC campuses participated in the pilot as well.
Moving from kitchen to garage to student housing
Rapid Rehousing felt like a “support system,” said Eli Reyneveld, a third-year communications major and soccer player at Sacramento State. He didn’t always want to be a student athlete, but after playing soccer at Modesto Junior College, the opportunity presented itself. “I scored a lot of goals,” he recalled.
When he received a Division I scholarship offer to cover his tuition at Sacramento State starting in spring 2024, he had just two days to accept. He worried whether he would be able to afford moving from his parents’ house in Modesto.
“I wasn’t ready to move anywhere, but I had to just take the jump,” Reyneveld said.
At first, Reyneveld moved into a house with five guys on the soccer team. He slept in the kitchen and paid $550 a month for his share of the rent.
It felt far from a home. It was hard for Reyneveld to get enough sleep, and there were tensions among his housemates. He moved into a different house shared by more of his teammates, where he slept on a mattress in the garage for $800 a month. A full night of rest was just as hard to get as the sound of cars never stopped.
Being a student athlete required Reyneveld to juggle school, traveling for games, training and maintaining a healthy diet. But his living conditions made it hard to eat and sleep consistently.
He avoided telling trainers and staff about his living situation, recalling being “too prideful to tell anybody,” until his athletic performance deteriorated. By September 2024, his trainer pulled him aside at practice and Reyneveld told him everything.
Eli Reyneveld, a member of the Sacramento State men’s soccer team, on the university’s soccer field on Jan. 27, 2026.
(
Aliza Imran
/
CalMatters
)
That week, Reyneveld met with Basic Needs Center staff and, that night, he was transferred into a hotel that Rapid Rehousing fully covered. Three days later, he moved into student housing where he would pay just $500 a month for five months, meals included.
“As soon as I got moved into a room, I think my coach and trainer could tell you, like, my performance is 180. I was a whole new player,” Reyneveld said.
Reyneveld moved out of student housing in February into his own apartment, where Rapid Rehousing is now paying him $200 a month for five months to help with his rent.
“I was about to turn down the scholarship to a D1 because I didn’t have the necessary means to move, but I just took a risk and (it) ended up working out because people are helping me,” he said.
Local organizations help campuses assist students
All campuses with Rapid Rehousing partner with community organizations that connect students to case managers, housing assistance, and academic and mental health support.
Long-term case management makes a big difference, according to Jessica Wolin, a public health lecturer at San Francisco State, who led the Cal State Long Beach evaluation of the program.
“Our evaluation showed the more meaningful outcomes for students who are experiencing homelessness is through this longer term, higher touch, more holistic intervention,” Wolin said. “And those needs are not met with (just) an emergency voucher.”
At Sacramento State, all students in the Rapid Rehousing program pay $500 per month toward their housing costs until they are ready for the next step. Other campuses, such as Chico State, determine students’ costs based on what they can afford. On-campus teams also work with financial aid offices to incorporate emergency grants into students’ aid packages.
Rapid Rehousing also teaches students about managing personal finances, understanding lease agreements, handling roommate conflicts, and planning for housing after graduation. Community partners work with students one semester prior to their graduation date to find housing they can afford or find relatives they can live with after graduation.
“Because these programs are (tied to enrollment), we have to make sure that we structure them so that students have some sense of urgency about the importance of working with us to find their next more permanent and stable housing that will be more long-term,” said Sacramento State Campus Wellness Director Emily Tupper.
ince 2020, Chico State’s Rapid Rehousing Program has provided over 600 students emergency shelter, transitional housing, or grants.
“A lot of students were thinking about dropping out of school and, after, they report that Rapid Rehousing has helped them stay in school,” said Chico State Basic Needs Director Leah Slem. “Our program is a lifeline to these students who possibly would have dropped out had they not received this assistance.”
When R.S., a student at Chico State who requested anonymity due to her international student status, first heard from her parents that they were on the verge of going bankrupt, she immediately went to the university’s International Student and Scholar Services office. In less than a month, she moved out of her off-campus apartment into on-campus student housing, which has been fully covered since November 2024.
With the help of her case manager, R.S. was referred to work on campus at Chico State’s Hungry Wildcat Food Pantry, which helped pay for her tuition.
International students often face unique challenges in college, Wolin said. In addition to not being able to access family support nearby, they are also not eligible for benefits like CalFresh.
“I was kind of going through a lot, but I didn’t really reach out for anything until the water almost got into my nose, and I’m like, ‘Oh no, you know, if I don’t help myself, who can help me?’’’ R.S. recalled. She urges all students to put themselves “out there” and to not be scared to ask for help.
Even with programs like Rapid Rehousing, housing insecurity still affects students across the state. As of April 2024, 1 in 5 community college students, 1 in 10 Cal State students and 1 in 20 UC students face homelessness, whereas 1 in 12 face homelessness in the general California population, according to California Competes.
From formerly homeless to doctoral dreams
The Cal State Long Beach evaluation of the Rapid Rehousing program at eight Cal States and two community colleges revealed how homelessness and housing insecurity disproportionately impacts certain student groups.
Of Cal State students, 4% identify as Black or African American, compared to 18.5% of Rapid Rehousing students. One-third of Cal State students are transfers, but transfers made up nearly half of Rapid Rehousing participants. Three-quarters of Rapid Rehousing students were first-generation, compared to a quarter systemwide. Foster youth made up 17% of the program, versus less than 1% of all students at Cal State.
Wolin said the findings reveal that “the program is reaching who they need to reach.”
As a formerly incarcerated, first-generation and transfer student at Chico State, Deleon recalled how “even having an associate’s (degree) was a big thing” for his family. He enrolled at College of the Desert to earn a 25-unit certificate in agriculture. On his first day, he recalled his professor telling him, “if you’re here for the certificate, you may as well stay for the degree.”
He completed his associate’s degree in agriculture, delivered his class graduation speech, and got accepted by all five Cal State universities he applied to. But after he left a long-term relationship at the end of that school year, he found himself homeless and couch surfing.
At Chico State, Rapid Rehousing helped Deleon remain in student housing throughout the 2024-25 school year while he worked on campus at Project Rebound, a program that supports formerly incarcerated students. In June, he moved into a shared off-campus apartment.
This fall, Deleon will be starting a master’s degree in agriculture at Chico State, and he hopes to later obtain a doctorate. If it weren’t for Rapid Rehousing, he said he doesn’t know if he would have had “the courage to stay in school.”
Deleon just returned from his first plane ride and research trip in Puerto Rico, where he saw plantain, mango, coffee berry and pineapple farms. Agriculture is what led Deleon back to school, he recalled, but Rapid Rehousing kept him in it.
“I’m planting those seeds of getting a Ph.D. now,” Deleon said. “(As) someone that’s formerly incarcerated, messed up his life before he got it back together … now that I have a second chance of getting my life right, look what I’ve done with it, with the opportunity I was given.”
Khadeejah Khan is a contributor with the College Journalism Network, a collaboration between CalMatters and student journalists from across California. CalMatters higher education coverage is supported by a grant from the College Futures Foundation.