Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • 'Compact' offers grant access. Newsom pushes back
    A sign in stone that says University of Southern California
    USC is one of nine schools that received a letter from the Trump administration Thursday.

    Topline:

    The White House is asking nine elite universities, including the University of Southern California, to sign a compact with the Trump administration in exchange for favorable treatment.

    Why now? The Associated Press obtained the letter on Thursday. It asks the universities to agree to the government's definition of gender, to exclude race and gender in college admissions decisions, limit the enrollment of international students, and cap tuition for U.S. students, among other demands.

    What is the White House offering in return? Universities that sign the "Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education” will receive preferential access to federal grants, according to a White House official who spoke to AP.

    The take from Sacramento: California Governor Gavin Newsom responded today, warning that any California university that signs a compact with the Trump administration will lose its state funding. 

    The background: The move comes as universities, including many in Southern California, face extraordinary pressure from the Trump administration, including the threat of pulling federal funding.

    What is USC saying? A USC spokesperson said in a statement that the university was reviewing the administration's letter.

    The White House is asking nine elite universities including the University of Southern California to sign a compact with the Trump administration in exchange for favorable treatment.

    The Associated Press obtained the compact on Thursday. It asks the universities to agree to the government's definition of gender, to exclude race and gender in college admissions decisions, limit the enrollment of international students, and cap tuition for U.S. students, among other demands.

    The 10-page letter also takes aim at free speech policies on campuses, asking the schools to commit to "transforming or abolishing institutional units that purposefully punish, belittle, and even spark violence against conservative ideas."

    Universities that sign the "Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education” will receive preferential access to federal grants, according to a White House official who spoke to AP.

    California Governor Gavin Newsom responded Thursday, saying that any California university that signs a compact with the Trump administration will lose its state funding. 

    "California will not bankroll schools that sell out their students, professors, researchers, and surrender academic freedom," Newsom said in a statement. 

    A USC spokesperson said in a statement that the university was reviewing the administration's letter.

    What happens if USC agrees to sign?

    The move comes as universities face extraordinary pressure from the federal government. The Trump administration has threatened to pull federal funding at colleges and attacked schools for policies not in line with the government's agenda.

    In Southern California, for instance, the federal government has asked UCLA to pay nearly $1.2 billion dollars to settle civil rights and antisemitism allegations in exchange for releasing nearly half a billion dollars in federal funding, according to the Los Angeles Times.

    Blake Emerson, a law professor at UCLA, said that if USC and other universities agree to the letter, it could create a "snowball effect" where other institutions follow suit.

    “They're trying to make sure that institutions adopt and teach views that are consistent with their political perspective," he said. "Those are the kinds of moves that make labels like authoritarianism apt and not alarmist."

    The letter was sent to Brown University, Dartmouth College, the University of Arizona, the University of Pennsylvania, Vanderbilt, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Texas, the University of Virginia, and USC.

    It’s not clear what an agreement would mean for USC’s various research centers and faculty who study race, equity and other topics that have drawn the ire of the administration.

    Faculty members associated with USC’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors wrote a letter to university leadership Thursday, according to an email sent by the chapter reviewed by LAist. The letters said that the compact "represents a historic and dangerous change to the principles of academic freedom that have shaped American education and research over the past century."

    Kelly Benjamin, the national spokesperson for that group, called the compact a "corrupt form of a loyalty oath."

    "To have colleges and universities pledge allegiance in order to receive funding or fair treatment from the federal government is bonkers," Benjamin said. "This is a new era of thought policing by this administration in American higher education."

  • How President Trump has challenged it

    Topline:

    In his first year back in the White House, President Trump has presided over a sweeping expansion of executive power while eroding democratic norms.

    What experts say: Many scholars of democracy say that these moves are unprecedented in U.S. history and that Trump has pushed the United States toward authoritarianism.

    What has happened so far? From firing inspectors general, to sidelining Congress, to attacking the media to control information, Trump and his administration have moved at warp speed from the moment he was sworn in.

    Read on... for more on how Trump has expanded his authority beyond what his predecessors have done.

    In his first year back in the White House, President Donald Trump has presided over a sweeping expansion of executive power while eroding democratic norms.

    Many scholars of democracy say that these moves are unprecedented in U.S. history and that Trump has pushed the United States toward authoritarianism.

    The president and his supporters counter that the Constitution provides for precisely the type of muscular presidency he is exercising and that voters gave him a mandate to enact far-reaching changes to government.

    Trump remains popular with his base, but most Americans disapprove of his job performance. The president's critics hope that waning popularity — as well as this year's midterm elections — will provide a stronger check on Trump.

    So what has happened so far? From firing inspectors general, to sidelining Congress, to attacking the media to control information, Trump and his administration have moved at warp speed from the moment he was sworn in.

    As Year 2 of his second term begins, we wanted to look at just some of the ways the president has expanded his authority beyond what his predecessors have done and how his administration has tested the constitutional foundations of the country.

    Checks and balances

    An illustration depicting a person wearing a red tie and suit stepping on a scale on a red white house as the Supreme Court and Capitol are raised on the other side.
    (
    Jackie Lay
    /
    NPR
    )

    Aided by a pliant Republican-led Congress, Trump and his administration have numerous times stretched the power of the executive branch into areas of governance normally reserved for the legislative branch. His aides have pulled back funds appropriated by lawmakers, who constitutionally control federal purse strings. The president has implemented sweeping foreign tariffs, using existing sources of authority in new, expansive ways. And his administration has remade or demolished whole federal departments.

    Other checks on a president's power, such as federal inspectors general and agency appointees who previously were insulated from White House influence, have also been sidelined.

    Loading...


    Freedom of speech and expression

    An illustration depicting a person wearing a suit and red tie pulling electrical chords from a power outlet.
    (
    Jackie Lay
    /
    NPR
    )

    Trump has targeted freedom of speech, attempting to control and change information — often with misinformation and falsehoods — to push his views into the media, higher education, national museums and the arts. He has intimidated major news outlets, defunded public media and made it increasingly difficult for journalists to report on his government, even threatening to jail reporters who won't identify government sources. The Trump administration has sought to erase parts of American history in the nation's museums, and the State Department was instructed to reject visa applications due to some applicants' alleged roles in "censorship."

    Loading...


    Rule of law

    An illustration of a gavel hitting and breaking the U.S. Capitol.
    (
    Jackie Lay
    /
    NPR
    )

    Trump has bulldozed through a norm separating the White House and the Department of Justice, openly using the DOJ to pursue an agenda of retribution by seeking investigations and prosecutions of his political foes. He has liberally used the pardon power to the benefit of allies, including those who were convicted of violent crimes during the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. Federal judges have accused the Trump administration of defying their orders and rebuked the administration for aggressive immigration tactics and attempts to consolidate Americans' sensitive data. And while Trump says he is overseeing a return of law and order, he frequently uses inciting language himself.

    Loading...


    Trump, family business and power

    An illustration of a large hand putting a coin into a coin slot on top of the White House.
    (
    Jackie Lay
    /
    NPR
    )

    Trump has taken other steps to consolidate power and demonstrate that he alone is in charge. His name and face seem to be everywhere. He receives fawning foreign visitors bearing gifts for him in a newly gold-adorned Oval Office.

    And Trump continues to flex his power by mixing policy with the business interests of his family and allies, casting aside any ethical concerns.

    Loading...


    Public health and science

    The Trump administration has upended the institutions charged with protecting public health and conducting scientific research. Initiatives that once enjoyed bipartisan support and are the shared responsibility of the states and the federal government saw their funding slashed. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. led the overhaul of the children's vaccine schedule, sidelining expert advisers and slashing the number of recommended immunizations. There have been disruptions and turmoil for federally funded research, including at the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The administration abruptly halted USAID's global health work, which had saved millions of lives from scourges like AIDS, malaria and malnutrition over the course of six decades.

    Loading...

    Ben Swasey, Yvonne Dennis, Kristian Monroe, Preeti Aroon, Pam Webster, Gerry Holmes, Pallavi Gogoi, Scott Horsley, Emily Kopp, David Folkenflik, Ciera Crawford, Matteen Mokalla, Jim Kane, Didrik Schanche, Elissa Nadworny, Steve Drummond, Diane Webber, Scott Hensley, and Sarah Knight contributed to this story. Design and development by Rahul Mukherjee and Alyson Hurt. Art direction by Danielle Scruggs and Emily Bogle.
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • Says he's living 'rent-free" in president's head
    A man wearing a blue suit holds up his hands as he speaks to another man wearing a dark suit, holding up a microphone.
    Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks to the press on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, on Tuesday.

    Topline:

    Gov. Gavin Newsom took his spat with President Donald Trump to the world stage Thursday, when he criticized the administration and corporate leaders he accused of “selling out” to the White House at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

    What Newsom said: Newsom told news site Semafor’s co-founder Ben Smith in an on-stage conversation Thursday that "we're deeply in their head. I think the affordability agenda appears to be — I’m living rent-free in the Trump administration’s head.” Newsom traded broadsides with U.S. officials throughout his three-day swing through the global confab in the Swiss Alps. For Newsom, who is widely expected to mount his own campaign for the presidency in 2028, the event provided a new audience for his signature brand of Trump-bashing.

    The backstory: The Davos drama between the White House and governor’s office escalated Wednesday after Newsom accused the Trump administration of working to block a speaking engagement the governor had planned on the sidelines of the conference. “They made sure it was canceled,” Newsom said. “And that’s what is happening in the United States of America — freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, freedom of speech — it’s America in reverse.”

    Gov. Gavin Newsom took his spat with President Donald Trump to the world stage Thursday, when he criticized the administration and corporate leaders he accused of “selling out” to the White House at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

    Newsom traded broadsides with U.S. officials throughout his three-day swing through the global confab in the Swiss Alps.

    For Newsom, who is widely expected to mount his own campaign for the presidency in 2028, the event provided a new audience for his signature brand of Trump-bashing.

    “We’re deeply in their head,” Newsom told news site Semafor’s co-founder Ben Smith in an on-stage conversation Thursday. “I think the affordability agenda appears to be — I’m living rent-free in the Trump administration’s head.”

    The Davos drama between the White House and governor’s office escalated Wednesday after Newsom accused the Trump administration of working to block a speaking engagement the governor had planned on the sidelines of the conference.

    “They made sure it was canceled,” Newsom said. “And that’s what is happening in the United States of America — freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, freedom of speech — it’s America in reverse.”

    The Trump administration did not respond directly to questions about Newsom’s claim and referred to the governor using a misspelling of his name frequently used by Trump.

    “No one in Davos knows who third-rate governor Newscum is or why he is frolicking around Switzerland instead of fixing the many problems he created in California,” White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said.

    The governor was in the room with business titans and world leaders Wednesday when Trump delivered a speech in which he called Newsom “a good guy” and appeared to offer to send National Guard troops to fight crime in California.

    As Trump took credit for declining crime and criticized cities with sanctuary immigration laws, cameras panned to Newsom, who laughed and shook his head.

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent responded Wednesday, accusing Newsom of “hobnobbing with the global elite while his California citizens are still homeless,” and deriding the governor as “too smug, too self-absorbed and too economically illiterate to know anything.”

    Bessent spoke at USA House, a privately funded venue holding events with American officials and executives, which was scheduled to host a “fireside chat” later that day between Newsom and media outlet Fortune.

    The governor’s office accused the Trump administration of pressuring the venue’s organizers to cancel the event.

    “I was going to speak last night … a simple conversation, discussion after Trump’s speech,” Newsom said. “They made sure that I didn’t.”

    In his conversation with Smith, Newsom discussed his transformation to becoming one of America’s leading Trump critics — a strategy of “fighting fire with fire” with memes and online jabbing that has won admiration from Democrats across the country.

    Though Newsom has attended the World Economic Forum previously, he credited his pugilistic approach for capturing attention in a fractured media environment.

    “I was doing my 10-point plans before, and I don’t think any of you would have been here this morning had I done that,” Newsom said.

    Asked whether California — where a majority of residents still believe the state is heading in the wrong direction — can be held up as a model of effective governance, Newsom responded that he is “proud of my state.”

    “We have more Fortune 500 companies than any state in America, more scientists, more engineers, more Nobel laureates in my state than any state in America,” he said.

    While Newsom criticized the business executives he said have failed to stand up to Trump, he also continued his public campaign against a proposed tax on billionaires that could appear on California’s November ballot.

    The proposal, a one-time 5% tax on assets excluding real estate, was proposed by a health care union to raise money for safety-net programs in the wake of federal cuts.

    While proponents of the measure are still collecting signatures to place the idea on the ballot, Newsom said high-income earners are already leaving the state in response. And he argued that the initiative’s focus on health care programs would leave less money for California schools.

    “It’s a badly drafted initiative … that literally takes teachers and takes our educational system out of any consideration of support,” Newsom said.

  • Trump administration abandons its appeal
    A group of men and women sit at a table, having a discussion. On the table are water bottles, papers, cellphones and a laptop
    Fresno Unified School District leaders, educators, parents and students share feedback about changes to the academic support department for Black and marginalized students during a community forum.

    Topline:

    The Trump administration has abandoned the legal defense of its campaign to strip federal funding from schools and colleges that promote diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.

    What happened: The administration formally dropped its appeal Wednesday in a filing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, leaving in place an August ruling from U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher in Maryland. The decision found that anti-DEI policies violated the First Amendment.

    Why it matters: Educators and advocates said that over the last year, the Trump administration’s campaign against diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives had a major effect on the landscape of both TK-12 schools and higher education, even in California. “The damage has already been done across the nation and even in California, where people think we’re impervious to the conservative backlash or right-wing movement,” said Royel Johnson, who leads the Race and Equity Center’s National Assessment of Collegiate Campus Climates at USC.

    The Trump administration has abandoned the legal defense of its campaign to strip federal funding from schools and colleges that promote diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.

    The administration formally dropped its appeal Wednesday in a filing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, leaving in place an August ruling from U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher in Maryland.

    A coalition of groups, including the American Federation of Teachers, challenged a “Dear Colleague” letter sent by the U.S. Department of Education in February, which targeted practices the administration said “toxically indoctrinated students with the false premise that the United States is built upon ‘systemic and structural racism.’”

    Gallagher said the federal government ran afoul of procedural requirements and violated the First Amendment with its letter, online portal to report discrimination, and other federal guidance.

    “The government did not merely remind educators that discrimination is illegal,” Gallagher wrote in her August order, “it initiated a sea change in how the Department of Education regulates educational practices and classroom conduct, causing millions of educators to reasonably fear that their lawful, and even beneficial, speech might cause them or their schools to be punished.”

    The latest legal development is “a victory for California students and families,” said Christopher Nellum, executive director of EdTrust-West, a nonprofit advocacy group that aims to dismantle racial and economic barriers in California’s education systems.

    “The evidence is clear: diversity, equity, and inclusion strategies expand access and help close opportunity gaps,” Nellum said in a statement to EdSource. “Federal funding threats aimed at dismantling these efforts undermine public education and harm the students who need support most.”

    Educators and advocates said that over the last year, the Trump administration’s campaign against diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives had a major effect on the landscape of both TK-12 schools and higher education, even in California.

    “The damage has already been done across the nation and even in California, where people think we’re impervious to the conservative backlash or right-wing movement,” said Royel Johnson, who leads the Race and Equity Center’s National Assessment of Collegiate Campus Climates at USC.

    Back in February, Johnson and other advocates for DEI policies said the federal government’s guidance was not law and warned institutions from overreacting to the February 2025 “Dear Colleague” letter. Johnson has seen schools cut funding or staff to departments and programs focused on underserved groups. Some institutions have also scrubbed references to race, ethnicity, the LGBTQ community, diversity or equity in favor of something more general like community, Johnson noted, including his own employer, USC.

    Some educational institutions in California made subtle changes over the last year. EdSource found that California State University institutions scrubbed some diversity buzzwords from their programs and websites. At Stanislaus State, for instance, “diversity” was dropped from events once called the Presidential Diversity Celebration Series. At CSU Monterey Bay, the Office of Inclusive Excellence became the Office of Community and Belonging.

    Johnson says something is lost when schools drop “identity safety clues” from spaces and organizations that serve as a beacon to students who “have a tough time seeing themselves on campus.”

    Some institutions were undeterred by federal and political pressure. Johnson points to Sacramento State as an institution that “doubled down” on its commitment to Black students and was among three colleges designated a California Black-Serving Institution. The Los Angeles Unified School District put more money into its Black Student Achievement Plan, despite being sued by a conservative group that called the program discriminatory.

    The latest development is a legal victory that establishes support for the values of equity and inclusion, said John Rogers, a professor at UCLA’s School of Education and Information Studies. But he says the Trump administration’s tactics were successful in disrupting education over the last year.

    “One of my concerns is that the strategy of the Trump administration is to disrupt and instigate a sense of conflict within local communities,” Rogers said.

    He points to other actions taken by the Trump administration that have also been disruptive, such as canceling protections for schools against immigration enforcement or targeting policies that are aimed at supporting LGBTQ students, especially transgender students.

    Johnson said that he hopes that schools and colleges can capitalize on this legal victory and stop self-censoring work under the banner of DEI that supports students and addresses the harms of the past. But he warns there will be more fights ahead.

    “I hope folks can feel more emboldened today,” said Johnson. “It doesn’t mean more isn’t coming.”

    EdSource is an independent nonprofit organization that provides analysis on key education issues facing California and the nation. LAist republishes articles from EdSource with permission.

  • Number of deaths are at their highest in a decade
    Two firefighters in yellow uniforms and two police officers in black uniforms stand around a white car that is on it's side, after having been involved in a crash
    Long Beach firefighters respond to a rollover crash on 10th Street and Elm Avenue where the driver knocked over a tree and busted through a metal fence.

    Topline:

    Long Beach has been striving for years to make its roads safer. In 2016, the City Council said it hoped to eliminate traffic deaths and serious injuries by 2026. It was their version of a Vision Zero plan that many municipalities have adopted. But in 2025, the city recorded 53 fatal traffic collisions, a sharp increase from 2024 and the most in more than 10 years.

    Pedestrian deaths: The greatest toll has been on people outside of cars. Last year, 32 people were killed while walking, biking or riding an e-scooter. That eclipses the number of people murdered here last year: 29. On Tuesday, the City Council voted to approve reducing speed limits on dozens of streets.

    The fix: Public Works told the Long Beach Post that seemingly simple fixes like the speed bumps aren’t feasible. Its engineers prefer other “traffic calming treatments.” Speed humps slow down emergency response vehicles and the department has received “objections to noise” caused by drivers hitting them, Padilla wrote in an email. Instead, the city favors “bulb outs” that extend curbs into the street at a crosswalk and “diverters” — islands that separate bicyclists from regular traffic and prevent cars from turning into neighborhoods or where it’s unsafe. Officials plan to install speed cameras at 18 locations throughout the city, but they’re not scheduled to be installed until the summer. They’ll then start issuing warnings to drivers until fines begin in the fall.

    Along busy streets in Long Beach’s Washington neighborhood, longtime resident Jesus Esparza says locals will consider just about anything to keep themselves safe from speeding drivers.

    The latest idea: leaving reflective vests on the worst street corners so pedestrians can don them while crossing and leave them for the next passerby.

    It’s a grassroots tactic that illustrates their frustration with Long Beach’s increasingly deadly streets. In 2025, the city recorded 53 fatal traffic collisions, a sharp increase from 2024 and the most in more than 10 years.

    Long Beach has been striving for years to make its roads safer. In 2016, the City Council said it hoped to eliminate traffic deaths and serious injuries by 2026. It was their version of a Vision Zero plan that many municipalities have adopted.

    But in the ensuing decade, Esparza, who leads the local neighborhood association, says he’s seen little progress. He’s regularly passed along residents’ requests for traffic-calming measures — things like adding more lighting or delaying green lights so pedestrians get a head start in a crosswalk. But, he said, he’s yet to see any effective measures installed.

    “We would always ask for speed bumps or speed tables,” Esparza said in Spanish, “but they don’t put them [on our streets.]”

    Despite a rise in deadly crashes, a spokesperson for Long Beach’s Public Works Department, which manages streets, said the city is still confident in its strategy.

    Its “core principles” include protecting pedestrians, bicyclists and motorcyclists by slowing down drivers, Public Works spokesperson Jocelin Padilla wrote in an email. Those plans “remain unchanged.”

    She said speeding is a primary factor in the city’s most serious crashes. Bad driver behavior, such as impairment and distraction, is also to blame.

    Their greatest toll has been on people outside of cars. Last year, 32 people were killed while walking, biking or riding an e-scooter. That eclipses the number of people murdered here last year: 29.

    Other residents have also pressed for faster action.

    On another dangerous section of roadway along Orange Avenue, resident Kelsey Wise said she’s seen countless near misses. In response, she spent hours putting together a PowerPoint presentation to convince the city to install speed humps on Orange Avenue between Seventh Street and Hellman Avenue.

    Wise estimated that roughly half of the drivers on her street travel above the posted 25 mph speed limit — a habit she finds increasingly troubling when teenagers from the nearby school zip through her neighborhood on electric scooters and e-bikes.

    Last month, Wise presented the information to Councilmember Mary Zendejas’ office, who told her they would refer the presentation to Public Works. She’s yet to hear anything back.

    “I think the system right now is designed to respond once something catastrophic happens, not when residents are signaling that something catastrophic is likely to happen,” Wise said.

    Public Works told the Long Beach Post that seemingly simple fixes like the speed bumps Esparza and Wise asked for aren’t feasible. Its engineers prefer other “traffic calming treatments.” Speed humps slow down emergency response vehicles and the department has received “objections to noise” caused by drivers hitting them, Padilla wrote in an email.

    Padilla said they instead favor “bulb outs” that extend curbs into the street at a crosswalk and “diverters” — islands that separate bicyclists from regular traffic and prevent cars from turning into neighborhoods or where it’s unsafe.

    Over the past few years, the city has “made meaningful investments” to redesign major corridors with those principles in mind, Padilla wrote. Last May, Long Beach celebrated the completion of a $44.2 million project that installed protected bike lanes, new crosswalks and other traffic safety features on Artesia Boulevard.

    On Tuesday, the City Council voted to approve reducing speed limits on dozens of streets.

    Kurt Canfield, an organizer with local street safety group Car-Lite LB, said he was skeptical that speed limit reductions would slow down drivers unless it ramps up enforcement. Cops have been writing fewer speeding tickets since the pandemic.

    The city has pivoted to relying on automated enforcement. Officials plan to install speed cameras at 18 locations throughout the city, but they’re not scheduled to be installed until the summer. They’ll then start issuing warnings to drivers until fines begin in the fall.

    Canfield said he hopes last year’s high death toll will be an outlier.

    “I think people are wanting to get back out and bike and walk, but as more people start doing that, now we have what essentially amounts to more targets to be victimized,” Canfield said.

    The high death toll, he said, doesn’t mean the city’s approach is wrong, Canfield said.

    “It just means that we need to try more, we need to continue building safer streets and changing behaviors because it does work,” he said.