Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Taxpayer-funded but with little results
    Someone holds a needle and is using a vial, wearing blue gloves
    Medical Assistant Jada Williams prepares a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine inside the UCSF Fresno Mobile Health and Learning unit In Fresno. The Centro Binacional para el Desarrollo Indigena Qaxaqueno (CBDIO) held a vaccination drive in Fresno Oct. 9, 2021.

    Topline:

    California officials have warned students for years that for-profit schools may make misleading career claims — leaving them with “a mountain of debt” but no job. Still, many for-profit schools remain on the state’s list of recommended job training programs.

    The backstory: Most adults who receive job training assistance get a tuition subsidy — over the past six years about half of those subsidy recipients went to private for-profit colleges — yet some of the most popular programs were for medical or nursing assistants, whose graduates earned less than $30,000 in the year after graduation, according to student outcome data collected by the state’s Employment Development Department.

    Graduate tracking: While California’s labor agency tracks employment rates for graduates who use job training subsidies, it doesn’t gather specifics about where they are working or whether they are working in the industry for which they trained.

    “There’s very little quality control,” said state Sen. Richard Roth, a Democrat from Riverside. “We spend so much money and we absolutely have no evaluation process in place to evaluate the use of the money.”

    Kiana Munoz didn’t have much time. She had a baby to care for and needed to earn money after just graduating from high school. When she saw that Premiere Career College, a for-profit school in Los Angeles County, promoted its ability to help her get a job as a medical assistant, she enrolled.

    But after graduating, she couldn’t find work. She said she spent months searching for a job at doctors’ offices, but eventually gave up and started working at Sears instead. More than six years later, she said she still owes the college more than $5,500.

    In 2022, California spent nearly $61 million of taxpayer dollars from the federal Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to support job training, typically for low-income and unemployed adults, according to the most recent data available. It’s one of the largest job training programs in California — designed by the federal government to prepare students for high-quality jobs.

    The reality is far different.

    Most adults who receive job training assistance get a tuition subsidy — over the past six years about half of those subsidy recipients went to private for-profit colleges — yet some of the most popular programs were for medical or nursing assistants, whose graduates earned less than $30,000 in the year after graduation, according to student outcome data collected by the state’s Employment Development Department.

    Trucking is the only training program that’s more popular, statewide. While it pays higher wages, the working conditions are so grueling that most new drivers quit within the first year. 

    “These jobs are a concern,” said Abby Snay, deputy secretary at the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency. “We need to do better as a system in advising people.”

    An attorney for for-profit Premiere Career College, Robert Orr, said the school would not comment in response to CalMatters’ questions about Munoz’s experience and how the school prepares students for careers.

    For years, state leaders have tried to limit for-profit schools, and the state attorney general’s office has an explicit warning to prospective students on its website:

    “The for-profit college and career training industry is not part of the public school system; they operate schools to maximize profits for their investors….Students have complained about aggressive recruiting practices, misleading graduation and employment rates, and illegal debt collection practices—their complaints suggest that many graduates can’t get jobs or afford to repay their loans. If you are not careful, enrolling in a for-profit school may leave you under a mountain of debt, but not help you get a job.”

    While California’s labor agency tracks employment rates for graduates who use job training subsidies, it doesn’t gather specifics about where they are working or whether they are working in the industry for which they trained.

    “There’s very little quality control,” said state Sen. Richard Roth, a Democrat from Riverside. “We spend so much money and we absolutely have no evaluation process in place to evaluate the use of the money.”

    In 2022, the Legislature passed his bill asking subsidiaries of the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency to collect better outcome data for students who received state job training subsidies. In an April hearing, Jennifer Sturdy, who oversees evaluations with the workforce development agency, said those changes would cost more than $25 million and will go into effect only if the governor agrees to fund them in next year’s budget.

    Why students prefer for-profit schools

    Munoz’s medical assistant program at Premiere Career College was designed to get her a job at a doctor’s office. Along with classes, the school offers resume and interview preparation, and promises to refer students to potential jobs. “Secure a career as an entry-level medical assistant performing a variety of front-office administrative duties,” the website says, before listing other possible careers for graduates, such as phlebotomy.

    That’s the primary benefit of many for-profit job training programs, according to interviews with officials at eight local workforce agencies: These programs are short, easy to access, and prioritize employment.

    But Munoz struggled to get the job she trained for. After graduating, she said, she spoke with a staff member at the college’s career counseling department repeatedly, and that the counselor referred her to a number of job openings, but they all required fluency in Spanish. “I had let her know, like numerous times, that I was not bilingual,” said Munoz, referring to her counselor. She went to about 10 interviews, she said, only to be rejected each time because she doesn’t speak Spanish.

    Today, the roughly six-month program at Premiere Career College costs just over $3,600 for tuition, plus roughly $3,000 for books and other fees, but tuition has varied widely each year, according to the school’s annual catalogs, which are submitted to the state. When Munoz was a student, the cheapest medical assistant program charged more than $10,000, including tuition and fees — more than half of which she said she still owes.

    In retrospect, Munoz wishes she had attended community college, which charges no tuition for low-income students.

    Another way students can receive free tuition, even at a for-profit school, is if the taxpayers pick up the tab. At job centers, career counselors provide such tuition money for adults who are low-income or unemployed. Since summer 2020, the job centers run by the Los Angeles County Department of Economic Opportunity have paid tuition for 13 students to attend Premiere Career College, according to department data.

    The Los Angeles department can refer students only to schools that meet its own requirements. Their training programs must be relatively short, typically less than six months, and the schools must individually track the wages and employment outcomes of any student referred by a workforce agency. “A lot of the colleges don’t want to go through the process, or it doesn’t align well with their semester or quarterly system,” said Irene Pelayo, a department program manager.

    Ultimately, students decide which institution to attend, among those that meet the requirements. She said the job centers typically see clients who prefer short-term programs and those that promise a job right after graduation.

    Turnover, low wages plague popular career paths

    From 2018 through 2023, the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency oversaw training for as many as 12,700 people, more than a quarter of whom attended for-profit trucking schools, according to the state’s data.

    Trucking programs offer a “big bang at the end,” said Pelayo, referring to the starting wage of graduates. A “perceived big bang,” she clarified.

    While experienced truckers can earn more than $100,000 a year, the career falls short in other ways. To gain the necessary experience, most graduates must first go into long-haul trucking, where they work 80-100 hours a week carrying goods across the country. They spend weeks on the road, away from friends and family, and in some cases, they end up earning less than minimum wage, according to a 2023 report from the UC Berkeley Labor Center. As a result, the report said, long-haul trucking has “extraordinary levels of turnover.” Some companies have to hire an entirely new workforce every year.

    “In terms of quality of training and first employment, this is like throwing workers into the deep end of the pool,” the report said.

    “Students were going to private programs and paying $3,000 for something they can get here for free.”

    Medical or nursing assistant is the second-most popular program, even though, as various government and academic research attests, the professions offer low wages and poor retention.

    “Medical assistants don’t make very much,” said Tammy Vant Hul, dean of the school of nursing at Riverside City College. She said the community college doesn’t offer any medical assisting programs. The closest is a program to become a certified nursing assistant, which enables graduates to work in hospitals, where they take vital signs and help patients get dressed, or to become home health aides. These jobs are in high demand.

    Vant Hul said Riverside City College began offering certificates for nursing assistants in 2018, after professors saw students attending private for-profit schools.

    “Students were going to private programs and paying $3,000 for something they can get here for free,” she said. “The quality was poor.”

    Last year the state awarded the community college a $1.4 million grant to expand its training for certified nursing assistants. Still, Vant Hul said, becoming a certified nursing assistant is not a “good stopping point” for a career. The certificate is useful, she said, mostly because it’s a prerequisite for becoming a licensed vocational nurse.

    Community colleges are 'changing the way we do things'

    For years, Gov. Gavin Newsom and other state leaders have pushed a new agenda for job training programs — one that prioritizes what he calls “good-paying, long-lasting, and fulfilling careers.” 

    Snay, with the state Labor and Workforce Development Agency, acknowledged that its most popular careers rarely meet the governor’s recent directives. As one solution, she pointed to “high road training partnerships,” which are designed to use public money to get people into jobs that provide family-sustaining wages, benefits, opportunities for promotion, and a way for workers to express their voice, such as a union. Some of these partnerships help adults become electricians or state employees, while another trains certified nursing assistants. So far, the results of the “high road” initiative are mixed.

    The governor is also pushing workforce agencies to collaborate more closely with colleges and universities. For years, the state has invested millions to boost enrollment at community colleges, often with the explicit goal of steering students away from expensive, for-profit schools and toward cheaper public options.

    “We’ve always felt there’s competition with these for-profit schools,” said Assemblymember Kevin McCarty, a Sacramento Democrat, in a hearing in March. He pressed community college leaders on what they’re doing to compete, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic decimated college enrollment rates.

    “We’re changing the way we do things,” answered Wrenna Finche, a vice chancellor with the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office. She said community colleges are trying to offer more night and weekend classes, shorter semesters, and new enrollment practices that don’t require students to wait until the beginning of a semester to start a class.

    Some community colleges choose not to compete with for-profits because the training doesn’t lead to what they consider high-quality jobs. The Los Angeles Community College District doesn’t offer any trucking courses, for example, though it does offer a certificate in truck maintenance, which pays better, said James Lancaster, the district’s vice chancellor of workforce and economic development. With each new major, he said, the district must prove to the state that the outcome is a job that’s “high skill, high wage, high demand.”

    “It’s difficult to show that we should use state apportionment dollars to get somebody a minimum-wage job,” he said. “…For-profits can do whatever they want. They’re not guided by ethics.”

    Job training data — or the lack of it

    Around 10 years ago, when he was first elected to represent Riverside in the state Senate, Roth visited a regional workforce agency. “I was looking not only at the number of training dollars and the number of training programs, but also what the product was,” he said. He wanted to know what percentage of people got jobs and what their career progression was. “I couldn’t find anything like that.”

    The law he wrote, if funded, would require state agencies to collect data about whether publicly funded students are employed in the careers they trained for. It would also gather data after the first year of employment, so that researchers could evaluate how publicly funded job programs affect a person’s long-term career trajectory.

    A new interactive website also aims to improve data collection about job training results — but the site is far from ready. The state is still “modernizing” it, Sturdy, with California’s labor agency, told Roth in the hearing. She said the website currently includes only a subset of the state’s job training data.

    For Roth, it all boils down to data — or the lack of it. “What gets measured gets done,” he said. “We have a definite lack of measurement activity going on with respect to these workforce training programs.”

    He said he’s worried that publicly funded job training programs are preparing people for positions that don’t exist, or are misleading them about their potential wages after graduation.

    After working in retail, Munoz found a front-office job at a doctor’s office, but it didn’t require her degree or pay her much more than minimum wage. She decided to go back to school to become a social worker.

    “These schools are taking your money,” she said, “then you have to start all over if it doesn’t work out.”

    Adam Echelman covers California’s community colleges in partnership with Open Campus, a nonprofit newsroom focused on higher education.

    Financial support for this story was provided by the Smidt Foundation and the James Irvine Foundation.

  • LA explores tax cut for Palisades rebuilds
    Fencing lines a sidewalk next to a home under construction. Signs on the fence bear the Horusicky name.
    Fencing lines a sidewalk next to a home under construction.

    Topline:

    As Los Angeles homeowners grapple with the expense of rebuilding after last year’s devastating fires, an L.A. City Council member is putting forward an idea that could lower some costs.

    Who’s behind it: Councilmember Traci Park, who represents the Pacific Palisades, has introduced a motion to explore waiving part of the city’s portion of the local sales tax for fire victims who purchase rebuilding materials in the city.

    The details: The plan calls for returning the 1% of the local 9.75% sales tax that goes into the city’s general fund. The waiver could apply to lumber, appliances and other rebuilding goods purchased within the city.

    Read on … to learn whether economists think the proposed tax relief could make a difference.

    As Los Angeles homeowners grapple with the expense of rebuilding after last year’s devastating fires, an L.A. City Councilmember is putting forward an idea that could lower some costs.

    Councilmember Traci Park, who represents the Pacific Palisades, has introduced a motion to explore waiving part of the city’s portion of the local sales tax for fire victims who purchase rebuilding materials in the city.

    The 1% of the local 9.75% sales tax that goes into the city’s general fund would be given back to consumers under the proposal. The waiver could apply to lumber, appliances and other rebuilding goods purchased within the city.

    The motion, introduced Friday by Park and seconded by Councilmember John Lee, says: “The City should do everything within its power to alleviate the financial burden for these residents and businesses in order to facilitate their return and stabilize the Pacific Palisades community.”

    Would it make much of a difference? 

    Economists told LAist the proposal could help many homeowners mitigate the high cost of rebuilding, but likely wouldn’t tip the scales for under-insured, under-resourced property owners.

    “It wouldn't hurt if it's very well designed and easy to use,” said Alexander Meeks, a director at the Santa Monica-based Milken Institute. “But I'm not sure if it's really going to tackle the scale of the financial challenge that survivors are facing.”

    Meeks noted that the tax waiver wouldn’t lower up-front costs such as environmental testing, architectural design and permitting. And it may not help homeowners sourcing raw materials from outside the city.

    Zhiyun Li, a UCLA Anderson School of Management economist, said the waiver could help some homeowners justify the additional cost of rebuilding more fire-safe structures.

    “Homeowners must typically pay out of pocket to upgrade to IBHS+ standards, which are more stringent,” Li said. “The tax waiver could encourage upgrading to IBHS+ standards or investing more in mitigation, thereby reducing future risk and improving the likelihood of maintaining insurance coverage.”

    What’s next for the proposal? 

    The proposed tax relief would not be available to properties that have been sold since the fires started in January 2025.

    The motion has been sent to the City Council’s budget and fire recovery committees. If approved by the full council, it would require the city administrative officer, the Office of Finance and the city attorney to report back to the council within 60 days on options for crafting a tax relief plan.

    The motion calls for the report to consider factors such as how to minimize the burden of administering the tax relief, what documentation homeowners would have to submit and what it would cost the city to oversee the program.

  • Sponsored message
  • Republicans in Congress say they have a deal

    Topline:

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said in a joint statement on Wednesday that the House will take up a measure passed by the Senate last week to fund most of DHS except Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol through the end of September. Republicans would then attempt to fund ICE and Border Patrol for three years using a party-line budget reconciliation bill that would not require support from Democrats.


    About the deal: The agreement comes nearly a week after House Republicans dismissed an identical plan, refusing to take up the Senate-passed measure and instead passing a 60-day short term funding bill for all of DHS that had little chance of overcoming Democratic opposition in the Senate. Democrats welcomed the agreement as in line with their pledge not to give ICE any more money without reforms after immigration enforcement agents killed two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis. But the deal does not include any of the policy demands Democrats are pressing for, such as a ban on masks for immigration enforcement officers and requiring warrants issued by a judge, not just the agency, to enter homes.

    What's next: Congress is on a two-week recess, but the Senate and House could move to fund all of DHS except ICE and CBP as early as Thursday using a procedure known as unanimous consent that allows the chambers to circumvent formal voting as long as no member objects. Even during a recess when most members are not in Washington, this could be unpredictable, especially in the House, where many hard-line conservatives oppose a deal that does not fully fund DHS. If a member does object, that could require waiting for another vote when all members are back from recess.

    Senate and House Republican leadership have resurrected a stalled plan to fund the Department of Homeland Security after a record 47-day funding lapse.

    House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said in a joint statement on Wednesday that the House will take up a measure passed by the Senate last week to fund most of DHS except Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol through the end of September.

    Republicans would then attempt to fund ICE and Border Patrol for three years using a party-line budget reconciliation bill that would not require support from Democrats.

    "In following this two-track approach, the Republican Congress will fully reopen the Department, make sure all federal workers are paid, and specifically fund immigration enforcement and border security for the next three years so that those law-enforcement activities can continue uninhibited," Thune and Johnson wrote.

    The agreement comes nearly a week after House Republicans dismissed an identical plan, refusing to take up the Senate-passed measure and instead passing a 60-day short term funding bill for all of DHS that had little chance of overcoming Democratic opposition in the Senate.

    Johnson called the agreement a "joke" and President Donald Trump declined to publicly endorse the deal. Trump had previously resisted any package that did not include his push to overhaul federal elections known as the Save America Act.

    "I think any deal they make, I'm pretty much not happy with it," Trump told reporters last week.

    Democrats welcomed the agreement as in line with their pledge not to give ICE any more money without reforms after immigration enforcement agents killed two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis. But the deal does not include any of the policy demands Democrats are pressing for, such as a ban on masks for immigration enforcement officers and requiring warrants issued by a judge, not just the agency, to enter homes.

    "For days, Republican divisions derailed a bipartisan agreement, making American families pay the price for their dysfunction," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., wrote in a statement Wednesday. "Throughout this fight, Senate Democrats never wavered."

    Trump seemed to bless the revived plan earlier Wednesday, writing on social media that he wants a party-line bill to fund immigration enforcement on his desk by June 1.

    "We are going to work as fast, and as focused, as possible to replenish funding for our Border and ICE Agents, and the Radical Left Democrats won't be able to stop us," Trump wrote.

    Despite the shutdown, ICE has been minimally impacted because Republican lawmakers approved $75 billion for ICE through another party-line budget reconciliation bill last year.

    Congress is on a two-week recess, but the Senate and House could move to fund all of DHS except ICE and CBP as early as Thursday using a procedure known as unanimous consent that allows the chambers to circumvent formal voting as long as no member objects.

    Even during a recess when most members are not in Washington, this could be unpredictable, especially in the House, where many hard-line conservatives oppose a deal that does not fully fund DHS.

    "Let's make this simple: caving to Democrats and not paying CBP and ICE is agreeing to defund Law Enforcement and leaving our borders wide open again," Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., a member of the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus, wrote on X. "If that's the vote, I'm a NO."

    If a member does object, that could require waiting for another vote when all members are back from recess.

    Claudia Grisales contributed reporting.
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Youth baseball program expanding
    A child with black hair and light skin poses for a photo with a mascot wearing a Dodgers uniform.
    Logan Cattaneo, 6, poses for a photo with the Dodgers mascot during Dodgers Dreamteam PlayerFest at Dodgers Stadium in 2024.

    Topline:

    The Dodgers Foundation says it's expanding Dodgers Dreamteam, its program for underserved youth. The foundation says the program will be able to serve 17,000 kids this year, 2,000 more than last year.

    Why it matters: Now in its 13th season, the program connects underserved youth with opportunities to play baseball and softball and provides participants with free uniforms and access to baseball equipment. It also offers training for coaches in positive youth development practices, as well as wraparound services for participant families like college workshops, career panels, literacy resources and scholarship opportunities.

    How to sign up: For more information and to sign up, click here.

  • Low snowpack could signal early fire season
    Aerial view of a forest of trees covered in snow
    An aerial view of snow-capped trees after a winter snowstorm near Soda Springs on Feb. 20, 2026.

    Topline:

    California clocked its second-worst snowpack on record Wednesday, a potentially troubling signal ahead for fire season. It’s an alarming end to a winter that saw abnormally dry conditions briefly wiped from California’s drought map in January, for the first time in a quarter-century.

    What happened? Though precipitation to date has been near average, much of it fell as rain rather than snow. Then March’s record-breaking heat melted most of the snow that remains. The state’s major reservoirs are nevertheless brimming above historic averages and are flirting with capacity, and a smattering of snow, rain and thunderstorms are dousing last month’s heat wave.

    Why it matters: Experts now warn that California’s case of the missing snowpack could herald an early fire season in the mountains. State data reports that California’s snowpack is closing out the season at an alarming 18% of average statewide, and an even more abysmal 6% of average in the northern mountains that feed California’s major reservoirs. “I think everyone's anticipating that it will be a long, busy fire season,” said Lenya Quinn-Davidson, director of the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Fire Network.

    California clocked its second-worst snowpack on record Wednesday, a potentially troubling signal ahead for fire season.

    It’s an alarming end to a winter that saw abnormally dry conditions briefly wiped from California’s drought map in January, for the first time in a quarter-century.

    Though precipitation to date has been near average, much of it fell as rain rather than snow. Then March’s record-breaking heat melted most of the snow that remains. The state’s major reservoirs are nevertheless brimming above historic averages and are flirting with capacity, and a smattering of snow, rain and thunderstorms are dousing last month’s heat wave.

    But experts now warn that California’s case of the missing snowpack could herald an early fire season in the mountains.

    On Wednesday, state engineers conducting the symbolic April 1 snowpack measurement at Phillips Station south of Lake Tahoe found no measurable snow in patches of white dotting the grassy field.

    “I want to welcome you call to probably one of the quickest snow surveys we’ve had — maybe one where people could actually use an umbrella,” joked Karla Nemeth, director of the California Department of Water Resources. “We’re getting a lot of questions about are we heading into a hydrologic drought? The answer is, I don’t know.”

    State data reports that California’s snowpack is closing out the season at an alarming 18% of average statewide, and an even more abysmal 6% of average in the northern mountains that feed California’s major reservoirs.

    Only the extreme drought year of 2015 beat this year’s snowpack for the worst on record, measuring in at just 5% of average on April 1st, when the snow historically is at its deepest.

    “I think everyone's anticipating that it will be a long, busy fire season,” said Lenya Quinn-Davidson, director of the UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Fire Network.

    “Without a snowpack, and with an early spring, it just means that there’s much more time for something like that to happen.”

    ‘It’s pretty bizarre up here’ 

    In the city of South Lake Tahoe, which survived the massive Caldor Fire in the fall of 2021 without losing any structures, fire chief Jim Drennan said his department is already ramping up prevention efforts.

    “It's pretty bizarre up here right now. It really seems like June conditions more than March,” Drennan said. “People are already turning the sprinklers on for their lawns.”

    Without more precipitation, an early spring may complicate prescribed burning efforts. But Drennan said fire agencies in the Tahoe basin can start mechanically clearing fuels from forest areas earlier than usual.

    “That means we can get more work done,” he said.

    It also means homeowners need to start hardening their homes now, said Martin Goldberg, battalion chief and fuels management officer for the Lake Valley Fire Protection District, which protects unincorporated communities in the Lake Tahoe Basin’s south shore.

    Goldberg urges residents to scour their yards for burnable materials, create defensible space and reach out to local fire departments with questions. The risks are widespread — from firewood, wooden fences, gas cans, plants, pine needles — even lawn furniture stacked against a house.

    “In years past, I wouldn't even think of raking and clearing until May,” Goldberg said. “But my yard's completely cleared of snowpack, and it has been for a couple weeks now.”

    ‘A haystack fire’

    Battalion chief David Acuña, a spokesperson for Cal Fire, said fire season is shaped by more than just one year’s snowpack.

    Climate change has been remaking California’s fire seasons into fire years. And California’s recent average to abundant water years have fueled what Acuña called “bumper crops of vegetation and brush.”

    “Most of California is like a haystack. And if you’ve ever seen a haystack fire, they burn very intensely because there's layers of fuel,” Acuña said.

    Like Quinn-Davidson, Acuña wasn’t ready to make specific predictions about fires to come.

    But John Abatzoglou, a professor of climatology at UC Merced, said the temperatures and snowpack conditions this year offer a glimpse of California in the latter decades of this century, as fossil fuel use continues to drive global temperatures higher.

    How this year’s fires will play out will depend on when, where and how wind, heat, fuel and ignitions combine. But it foreshadows the consequences of a warmer California for water and fire under climate change.

    “This,” Abatzoglou said, “is yet another stress test for the future in the state.”

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.