Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Graduate worker strike left mixed legacy for some
    The University of California system has 48,000 UAW members, more than Stellantis. In the fall of 2022, UC graduate student workers went on strike and won 46% raises over two years.
    Hundreds of UC academic workers picketing at UCLA in Los Angeles in 2022.

    Topline:

    One year later, the massive University of California strike by graduate student workers and researchers has improved pay and working conditions. But the divisions that were apparent in the final vote still remain.

    What happened in 2022: Nearly 50,000 UC academic workers received pay raises and improved working conditions after a six-week strike.

    How it’s playing out: Some report that working relationships between faculty and graduate students have soured and that it's affecting research. Others say that they remain satisfied about wanting to hold out for a better deal. And others say things are good — better pay, more benefits, and still-strong relationships.

    Why it matters: Students at other universities — like the University of Southern California — have also been organizing for better pay and working conditions. The experience of UC students might inform bargaining and expectations.

    Listen 1:05
    One Year Later, Massive University Of California Grad Student Strike Leaves Complicated Legacy For Some

    UC Irvine doctoral student Tia Chung-Swanson didn't miss the reminder of how her life changed a year ago.

    “I get… memories on my photos,” she said, alluding to how smartphones can generate collections from years past.

    One photo shows her on the first day of the UC graduate student strike on Nov. 14, 2022. She’s holding a megaphone. She was one of nearly 50,000 graduate students across 10 University of California campuses whose United Auto Workers-affiliated locals went on strike for higher pay and better working conditions.

    The UAW called it the largest strike in higher education in U.S. history.

    Chung-Swanson says she didn’t get involved because it would be historic. She and other graduate students worked full-time hours on research, helping teach, or tutor, and were paid wages they could not live on.

    “I really only got involved [because] I don't think I want to work in a department where we're not supporting each other and we're not fighting for more,” she said.

    And the contract that finally ended the six-week strike gave workers more. The UC graduate students were represented in multiple units that negotiated for postdocs, graduate student workers, and student researchers.

    Chung-Swanson is happy with the wage increases and so are her union colleagues on campus. They celebrated the anniversary last Tuesday grilling some burgers and hot dogs at the community center in campus graduate housing.

    Still, many of the concerns and divisions that were apparent in the final vote to ratify those agreements linger a year later.

    Employees and employers

    Chung-Swanson thinks about some of the personal costs of the strike.

    “I've seen [students] facing retaliation. I've definitely felt that relationships are changed,” Chung-Swanson said.

    She’s talking about relationships with faculty.

    The field many of these students work in doesn't have the long history of organized labor that other parts of the economy do.

    “[In science] you're asking hard questions that people don't know the answer to, you have to constantly devise experiments to try to prove yourself wrong, and [it] just involves so much and back and forth between the mentor and the mentee … counting hours is something that's never been on our radar," said Elliot Botvinick, a UC Irvine professor in the departments of surgery and biomedical engineering.

    He supervises a half dozen doctoral students in research involving the physics of cancer and the making of devices to treat type 1 diabetes.

    “Now I feel like an employer, which is an absolute catastrophe from the point of view of doing science,” he said.

    The contract and its rules, he said, are affecting his lab’s productivity. But the previous arrangement of low pay for full time-plus work had to change, he added.

    Tiers for union workers

    The strike attracted national attention because of how many workers the union represented, the non-traditional aspect of those workers, and that pickets were going on across California.

    “Once the UAW got that particular feather in its cap, it was no longer really interested in us,” said Janna Haider, a fifth year doctoral student in the history department at UC Santa Barbara.

    She voted against ratification of the contract after the strike.

    The strike’s legacy, she said, is that it created a two-tier pay increase, giving higher raises to some union members at UCLA, UC Berkeley, and UC San Francisco.

    “Sixty-seven percent of academic student employees on the Santa Barbara campus voted no on the contract because it leaves so many of us in poverty,” she said.

    Her wages went up $8,000 to $29,000 for the work she does, but Santa Barbara’s cost of living remains high for many grad students, even with the increased pay.

    LAist reached out to UAW leadership for response to the criticisms.

    “The new GSR contract has made a huge difference in my life. My annual salary has increased by $6,800 since last winter and I now have paid PTO and days off for bereavement leave,” said Madeline Vailhe, a UC Santa Barbara graduate student, in an email response to the inquiry.

    Vailhe also said she has not felt relationships change since the strike’s end.

    Sharing experience

    UC grad students’ experience during and after their strike could inform USC unionized grad students who gave their leaders the green light to strike last month.

    “I’ve had the privilege of having some conversations with rank-and-file union members at USC,” UCSB's Haider said.

    She urged them to keep decision-making with the local members.

    “Lean in to your grassroots organizing, lean in to the rank-and-file movement," she said. "Remember that the statewide power structure is there to support you, not to dictate to you."

  • CA may ban countertops after lung disease outbreak
    A Latino man wearing a blue sweatshirt and blue LA Dodgers baseball cap looks downward. He has a black moustache and goatee. Plastic tubing to help him breathe is tucked into each nostril and runs over his cheeks toward the back of his head.
    Juan Gonzalez Morin died at 37 in 2023 after cutting and grinding artificial stone countertops in the Los Angeles area.

    Topline:

    California is considering prohibiting the fabrication and installation of artificial-stone countertops — effectively banning the products — in response to an epidemic of the fatal lung disease silicosis among workers who cut, grind and polish countertop slabs before they are fitted into homes and businesses.

    What is silicosis? Silicosis is caused by the inhalation of pulverized silica, one of the most common minerals on earth. The silica that threatens the fabricators’ lungs comes from quartz, which is crushed and mixed with resins and pigments to make artificial stone — also known as engineered stone — a cheaper, more versatile alternative to natural stone like granite or marble. The ingredients are poured into molds, a process that allows for mass production of countertop slabs. When a slab is cut, ground or polished in preparation for installation, a pestilent powder is released into the air and drawn into workers’ lungs, where it collects and causes slow suffocation.

    How many silicosis cases do we know of? Public Health Watch, LAist and Univision were the first to disclose a silicosis cluster among Southern California countertop fabrication workers in December 2022. Five months after the initial stories were released by Public Health Watch and its media partners, the California Department of Public Health had confirmed 69 cases of silicosis statewide. As of April 8, that number had grown to 542, with 29 deaths. More than half of these cases — 279 — came from Los Angeles County.

    Read on... for more on the original stories about silicosis by Public Health Watch, LAist and Univision.

    California is considering prohibiting the fabrication and installation of artificial-stone countertops — effectively banning the products — in response to an epidemic of the fatal lung disease silicosis among workers who cut, grind and polish countertop slabs before they are fitted into homes and businesses.

    Silicosis is caused by the inhalation of pulverized silica, one of the most common minerals on earth. Public Health Watch, LAist and Univision were the first to disclose a silicosis cluster among Southern California countertop fabrication workers in December 2022. A year later, the California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board adopted an emergency temporary standard that required the employers of such workers — most of whom are young, immigrant men — to suppress toxic silica dust with water and take other protective measures. That standard became permanent in December 2024.

    Five months after the initial stories were released by Public Health Watch and its media partners, the California Department of Public Health had confirmed 69 cases of silicosis statewide. As of April 8, that number had grown to 542, with 29 deaths. More than half of these cases — 279 — came from Los Angeles County.

    What is silica?

    The silica that threatens the fabricators’ lungs comes from quartz, which is crushed and mixed with resins and pigments to make artificial stone — also known as engineered stone — a cheaper, more versatile alternative to natural stone like granite or marble. The ingredients are poured into molds, a process that allows for mass production of countertop slabs.

    When a slab is cut, ground or polished in preparation for installation, a pestilent powder is released into the air and drawn into workers’ lungs, where it collects and causes slow suffocation. There is no cure for silicosis; the only procedure that can buy some victims time is a double-lung transplant, which is expensive, cumbersome and rarely prolongs life beyond 10 years.

    Why is California considering banning engineered stone?

    The Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board is scheduled to take video testimony from fabrication workers suffering from silicosis at its meeting Thursday in Santa Rosa. It is not expected to vote on a ban, however, any sooner than its May 21 meeting in Los Angeles.

    Should California choose to ban engineered stone, it would be the first state to do so. Australia banned the material in 2024 after experiencing a silicosis outbreak that claimed an estimated 1,000 victims.

    The standards board is required to respond to a petition submitted in December by the Western Occupational and Environmental Medical Association, a nonprofit that represents more than 600 physicians and other health experts in seven states. In that petition, the association asked the board to “prohibit all fabrication and installation tasks ... on engineered stone that contains more than 1% crystalline silica. This action is necessary in light of the continuing epidemic of silicosis that is causing disease and death among California fabrication workers ...” Engineered-stone countertops typically contain more than 90% crystalline silica, the most common and dangerous form of the mineral; another form, amorphous silica, is not believed to pose serious health risks.

    Lawyers representing hundreds of sick workers and their families in litigation against countertop manufacturers say engineered stone cannot be handled safely.

    “Artificial stone is too toxic to be safely fabricated,” said Raphael Metzger, who practices in Long Beach and won a $52.4 million jury verdict — the nation’s first — against 34 manufacturers in August 2024. “Every week I meet with about a half-dozen fabricators, many of whom have silicosis.”

    “The silicosis crisis is not a failure of rules — it’s a failure of a product,” said James Nevin, based in Novato, California. The medical association’s “proposed ban works because it removes that hazard at its source. Every jurisdiction that has reduced disease has done so by eliminating crystalline silica artificial stone itself — not by pretending it can be used safely.”

    Countertop manufacturers are not standing by quietly. In a March 27 letter to the standards board, Cosentino North America, part of Spain’s Cosentino Group, said, “Effective [workplace safety] standards already exist, but there are non-compliant fabrication shop owners that do not implement them and put their workers at risk.” With “the correct controls in place,” the company said, “engineered stone can be fabricated safely.”

    Cal/OSHA enforces silica rule

    California’s silica rule is enforced by the state’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health, known as Cal/OSHA. In a statement to Public Health Watch, a Cal/OSHA spokesperson said the agency had opened more than 140 inspections of fabrication shops since the emergency temporary standard took effect in December 2023. Those inspections unearthed more than 580 violations, the spokesperson said.

    In a presentation to the standards board at its March meeting, Eric Berg, Cal/OSHA’s deputy chief for health, research and standards, said the agency had assessed a total of $1.8 million in penalties against fabrication shop owners alleged to have violated the silica rule. Stop-work orders were issued to 26 shops where dry-cutting of artificial stone — a prohibited practice — or inadequate respiratory-protection measures were observed, Berg said.

    Last year, Cal/OSHA estimated that the state had 920 fabrication shops, employing some 4,600 workers.

    It's unclear which way the standards board will go when the proposed ban comes up for a vote. In a February 27 letter, Chairman Joseph M. Alioto Jr. urged district attorneys in the seven counties that account for nearly 95% of the silicosis cases in California to pursue criminal charges against violators.

    “Please do not be misled by the misdemeanor classification of [silica violations],” Alioto wrote. “These are no ordinary misdemeanor cases, as the science bears out. Dry-cutting on its own will result in serious injury in a majority of cases. That means that every successful misdemeanor you prosecute will shutter a violating employer and save workers’ lives.”

    The medical association on whose petition the board must rule, however, argued that “education and enforcement alone will not be sufficient to curtail the escalating occupational health emergency caused by” engineered stone.

    After Australia banned the material, alternatives with the same “quality, look and feel” but free of crystalline silica took its place, the petition says. If the standards board follows Australia’s lead, “it is highly likely that these safer products will be made immediately available in the California market, without significant economic consequences for fabrication businesses and their workers.”

    Jim Morris is executive director and editor-in-chief of Public Health Watch, a nonprofit investigative news organization.

  • Sponsored message
  • Get your buzz on at LA’s coolest caffeine spots
    An outside patio full of wooden tables and benches rises above the ground; beyond is nothing but thick trees and vegetation
    Cafe on 27's picturesque setting in Topanga

    Topline:

    It isn’t hard to find great coffee in L.A. But if you’re ready to break from your usual morning routine, head to these one-of-a-kind coffee shops you wouldn’t find anywhere else.

    Why try them: There’s more to L.A. coffee than Maru and Intelligentsia — no shade to either of these places! These five cafés are distinctly unique, each with their own Angeleno flair.

    What to expect: Specialty Brazilian drinks in an Art Deco interior, coffee and brunch in the treetops of Topanga and espresso on the edge of a Porsche racetrack.

    There’s no shortage of great coffee shops in LA. It’s maybe something we’re especially known for — L.A., after all, is home to many a viral matcha moment and Instagrammable coffee shop interior. But the city also houses several unique cafés that make your coffee break feel a little more like a break from reality.

    These five coffee shops may part from tradition, but they certainly don’t fall short on the cool factor, or on quality.

    Aquarela (Downtown) 

    A coffee stand in the middle of a gorgeous art deco building, with an inlaid marble floor and wood panelling
    Aquarela’s stunning marble lobby was completed in 1931.
    (
    Courtesy CalEdison
    )

    DTLA is home to many wonderful coffee shops, but none can rival the beauty and splendor of Aquarela, a café nestled inside the marble halls of the historic CalEdison building. Here, you’ll find rare Brazilian farm-direct coffees, plus tropical smoothies and small snacks like pão de queijo (cheesy, savory bread bites). Beyond the stunning Art Deco digs, the specialty drinks are the real draw here — the Batida, a nod to the popular Brazilian cocktail, blends iced coffee with coconut, banana and condensed milk to transport you directly to the beach in Rio.

    Location: 601 W 5th St., Los Angeles
    Hours: Monday to Friday, 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.

    Cafe on 27 (Topanga)

    An outside scene; in the foreground three pieces of avocado toast sit on a wooden plate on a wooden table; in the background is a lower canopy-covered seating section, with nothing but green trees in the far back.
    Toast and views from Cafe on 27
    (
    Courtesy Cafe on 27
    )

    There’s a certain je ne sais quoi to drinking coffee while forest bathing. Cafe on 27, a treehouse-style brunch spot in Topanga Canyon, delivers this experience wonderfully. The sprawling, tree-blanketed patio opens out directly into the canyon, where verdant hills are the only thing you’ll see for miles.

    Like any good treehouse would, Cafe on 27 serves organic coffees that are roasted on-site. Matcha, hot tea and freshly-squeezed orange juice are also on offer, alongside brunch staples like avocado toast, crab cake benedicts, pancakes and Nutella waffles. Note: reservations are required on weekends and holidays, and highly recommended on weekdays, otherwise expect an hour-plus wait.

    Location: 1861 N Topanga Canyon Blvd., Topanga
    Hours: Monday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.; Saturday to Sunday 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.

    Casita Basqueria (Malibu)

    If you haven’t yet been to Casita Basqueria, the rustic Malibu cottage serving coffee, Basque grocery staples and often sold-out sandwiches, a drive up the Pacific Coast Highway is in order. Tucked in Surf Canyon among a small commune of artisanal retailers and workshops, Casita Basqueria makes for a wonderful weekend stop for brunch and coffee. Get there right at 11 a.m., if you can; the bocadillo sandwiches, which are made in limited quantities on fresh pan de cristal, are known to vanish within 20 minutes of opening. Sandwich offerings rotate daily, but the espresso machine can always be counted on to whip up a good latte or cappuccino.

    The exterior of a quaint cottage like building, with cream wooden paneling on the outside, a wooden front door, and a yellow surfboard leaning next to it, with yellow sunflowers in a jar in the front.
    The best time to show up to Casita Basqueria is right at 11 a.m.
    (
    Courtesy Casita Basqueria
    )

    Location: 3730 Cross Creek Rd., Malibu
    Hours: Monday to Saturday, 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.

    Granada (Echo Park) 

    The interior of a living room has a silver dining table with people sitting around it; the atmosphere is mellow and stylish; outside the open patio doors are people sitting at another large table
    Granada’s airy digs and delicious coffee catapulted it into instant stardom.
    (
    Cecilia Seiter/LAist
    )

    You could easily walk by Granada, L.A.'s newest coffee scene darling, without realizing that there’s a buzzy cafe nestled amid the towering Victorians of residential Angeleno Heights. But here it is, up an unsuspecting driveway and into the first floor of owners’ Sydney Wayser and Isaac Watters’ home, a concept made possible by LA County’s Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operation (MEHKO) program.

    It’s easy to see why Granada so swiftly achieved the viral status it did. The light-filled living room and locally-crafted furniture beckon guests to sit and stay. The garden, lush with palms and a pomegranate tree, also provides ample seating. An iced latte with whole milk will set you back $7 — par for the course in L.A. — but soaking in the sunlight filtering through the window while snacking on a pastry by baker Sasha Piligian (of Canyon Coffee and Chamberlain Coffee) feels like a fair trade. Connecting to the wifi here proves a journey, but if you can hotspot it, this is a fantastic place to knock out a few hours of work.

    Location: 1451 Carroll Ave., Los Angeles
    Hours: Wednesday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.

    Speedster Café (Carson) 

    A blue and red cup of coffee with a foam top sits on top of a white napkin which says Porsche. To its side is a blue ceramic plate with a mix of blueberries, almonds and green mint leaves.
    Coffee and racecars make for an excellent pairing.
    (
    Courtesy Porsche Experience Los Angeles
    )

    Fuel up on espresso as Porsche 911 GT3s fly by at Speedster Café. Situated at the edge of the racetrack at the Porsche Experience Center, Speedster offers a range of espresso drinks, plus breakfast sandwiches on brioche buns, matcha lattes and wines by the glass. Both indoor and outdoor seating are available, and if you need something a little more filling, you can always head upstairs to eat lunch at Porsche’s sit-down restaurant, 917.

    Location: 19800 South Main St., Carson
    Hours: Tuesday to Saturday, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; third Sunday of the month, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

  • Strike avoided, school continues Tuesday
    A woman's face, which is medium skin tone, is hidden behind a piece of white poster board that says "Parents supports educators!"
    UTLA and SEIU have been engaged in contract negotiations with LAUSD for over a year.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles Unified support staff reached a labor deal with the district early Tuesday morning, hours before a strike was set to begin.

    Why now: Two days after LAUSD reached new deals with its teachers union and its principals union, the district tentatively agreed on a contract with SEIU Local 99.

    Why it matters: The unions gave the district an April 14 deadline to reach a deal, or face a walkout. A strike by all three would have shut down district schools and disrupted the education of about 400,000 students and the lives of families scrambling for child care.

    The backstory: The unions had been negotiating with the district over pay, benefits and additional support for students for more than a year. The members of each union voted overwhelmingly to give their leaders the power to call a strike after contract talks stalled.

    What's next: SEIU Local 99 said in a press release that the agreement raises members wages 24% and will rescind the recent layoff notices for hundreds of IT workers. The union’s members and the Los Angeles Unified school board must vote to approve the deal.

    Los Angeles Unified support staff reached a labor deal with the district early Tuesday morning, hours before a strike was set to begin — meaning schools will remain open for nearly 400,000 students.

    "The tentative agreement makes strides in addressing key issues raised by school workers in negotiations," SEIU Local 99 said in a statement Tuesday morning.

    The union said the new agreement raises members' wages 24% and will rescind the recent layoff notices for hundreds of information technology workers. LAUSD confirmed the details of deal are still being worked out.

    The district had previously reached new deals with its teachers union and its principals union over the weekend.

    ”Our commitments reflect the dedication of our entire workforce. We are grateful for the collaboration that made this possible and hopeful that this marks a new chapter of partnership," Andrés Chait, the acting superintendent, said in a statement Tuesday morning. "At the same time, we are clear-eyed about the challenges ahead and know that meeting them will require continued trust, shared responsibility, and a united focus on what matters most — our students."

    How the deal came together

    The unions had given the district an April 14 deadline to reach a deal, or face a walkout. A strike by all three would have shut down district schools and disrupted the education of hundreds of thousands of students and the lives of families scrambling for child care.

    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass joined the negotiations with SEIU Local 99, which continued late Monday night. The deal was announced at 2 a.m. Tuesday.

    The unions had been bargaining with the district over pay, benefits and additional support for students for more than a year. The members of each union voted overwhelmingly to give their leaders the power to call a strike after contract talks stalled.

    The union’s members and the Los Angeles Unified school board must vote to approve the deal. The union said it would release more details of the deal at a news conference later Tuesday.

  • Swalwell exit leaves field in disarray
    Seven candidates are on stage behind lecterns each with their name.
    Talk radio host Tavis Smiley, left, moderates the California Governor Candidate Forum presented by Empowerment Congress at the California Science Center in January. The candidates appearin, from: Xavier Becerra, Ian Calderon, Jon Slavet, Tom Steyer, Eric Swalwell, Tony Thurmond, Antonio Villaraigosa and Betty Yee.

    Topline:

    With Rep. Eric Swalwell out of the race amid serious allegations of sexual assault and misconduct, the Democratic race for governor remains a toss-up, with Tom Steyer and Katie Porter most likely to benefit from his withdrawal.

    How we got here: Swalwell suspended his campaign Sunday evening and resigned from Congress Monday afternoon — a swift fall from power for one of the state’s leading candidates for governor.

    What's next: In theory, one fewer Democratic candidate in the race should help liberal voters consolidate the field. But in a race that was already anyone’s to win, Swalwell’s exit has only “caused more confusion,” said political strategist Marva Diaz, who primarily works with Democrats but is not involved in any gubernatorial campaign. “I’ve never seen something so in flux while ballots are about to drop."

    If voters were confused about who to support in California’s wide-open race for governor, Rep. Eric Swalwell’s exit amid allegations of sexual assault and misconduct may leave them as mystified as ever.

    Swalwell suspended his campaign Sunday evening and resigned from Congress Monday afternoon — a swift fall from power for one of the state’s leading candidates for governor.

    He said he would “fight the serious, false allegation made against me. However, I must take responsibility and ownership for the mistakes I did make.”

    In theory, one fewer Democratic candidate in the race should help liberal voters consolidate the field. But in a race that was already anyone’s to win, Swalwell’s exit has only “caused more confusion,” said political strategist Marva Diaz, who primarily works with Democrats but is not involved in any gubernatorial campaign.

    “I’ve never seen something so in flux while ballots are about to drop,” she said.

    Where things stand

    Because Swalwell dropped out after a statutory deadline to formally withdraw from an election, his name will still appear on the June 2 primary election ballot. That makes it possible he’ll still get some votes, but his rivals are already seeking to scoop up as many of his supporters as possible.

    Both billionaire climate advocate Tom Steyer and law professor and former Rep. Katie Porter circulated polls indicating they could both pick up a sizable portion of Swalwell’s potential voters. Pollsters with the Public Policy Institute of California and UC Berkeley both agreed Steyer and Porter were the most likely to benefit from prior Swalwell supporters.

    But they may not be the only ones, and it’s not clear that either one of them will immediately surge into the lead. An independent campaign committee supporting San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan pulled in $12 million million in new and previously committed contributions from wealthy donors since Friday, committee spokesperson Matt Rodriguez said, indicating his backers see an opening.

    They’re launching $4.5 million worth of TV and digital ads Tuesday. Mahan is one of the race’s lower-polling candidates, getting 3% of likely voters’ support in a poll commissioned last week by the state Democratic Party.

    Until the San Francisco Chronicle and CNN last Friday published stories with explosive sexual misconduct allegations from four women, including a former staff member, Swalwell had consistently polled ahead of most other Democrats in the race for governor. He was often in a three-way tie for lead Democrat alongside Porter and Steyer, with each of them getting between 10% and 15% of voters polled, tied with or trailing the two leading Republicans, Steve Hilton and Chad Bianco.

    What happens to his endorsments?

    And though Swalwell counted among his supporters a sizable share of the Democratic establishment — his colleagues in Congress, major labor unions and other Sacramento interest groups — it was by no means a consensus. Now, after those groups have scrambled through emergency weekend meetings to pull their endorsements, they’ll have to slog through their internal procedures if they want to back another candidate for governor.

    That gives voters fewer pointers on which candidate to back, Diaz said. Some organizations, she added, may be hesitant to endorse another candidate out of concern they, too, could have damaging backgrounds.

    “Most people look to labor for guidance, especially on the Democratic side,” Diaz said. “When labor organizations are not working in tandem, it causes a lot of confusion.”

    Swalwell was one of four Democrats the California Labor Federation jointly endorsed for governor, along with Porter, Steyer and former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. The federation, which could not reach consensus on any individual candidate, likely won’t be revisiting its other endorsements with Swalwell gone, president Lorena Gonzalez said.

    But the Service Employees International Union, California Teachers Association and other heavyweights in Democratic politics which had endorsed Swalwell and then withdrew their support may not have time to go back to the drawing board to pick a new candidate. The teachers’ union’s endorsement process, for example, required a vote among hundreds of members from across the state; the union’s next such meeting isn’t scheduled until after the June 2 primary.

    Representatives of both unions said they did not have any campaign updates Monday. A spokesperson for the California Professional Firefighters, another major Swalwell supporter, did not respond to inquiries.

    Where his backers may throw their support

    The effects of Swalwell’s exit on public polling of the race may not be seen for weeks. Donors often look to such measures of a candidate’s performance to decide who to back.

    In the last survey UC Berkeley’s Institute of Governmental Studies conducted of the governor’s race, in March, Swalwell’s supporters leaned more liberal and progressive, said institute co-director Eric Schickler. Swalwell also did better than other candidates among older voters and white voters.

    Those voters cut a similar profile to Porter’s supporters, Schickler said, lending credence to the idea that his supporters would start following her.

    “On the other hand, Porter has had trouble, for a visible politician, has had trouble winning over a lot of Democratic establishment figures in her own right,” he said. “If you look at the support, it’s a little more similar, but not so striking to say these supporters automatically go there.”

    What about Swalwell's seat in Congress?

    As for Swalwell’s congressional seat, it’s not clear when he’s stepping down. But he said he would work with his congressional staff to ensure they are able to meet the needs of his San Francisco East Bay district, where he was first elected in 2013.

    Swalwell’s resignation Monday leaves the call for a special election to finish his term entirely at Newsom’s discretion, since the candidate filing deadline for the June primary has passed, according to the state election code.

    Newsom’s office would not say Monday whether the governor will do so.

    But if he calls for the election, the earliest date it could be held would be in mid-August, since state law requires it to take place between 126 and 140 days after the proclamation. If Newsom declines to call a special election, Swalwell’s seat will remain vacant until mid-January 2027, dealing a blow to the U.S. House Democrats who are already outnumbered by the Republican majority.

    Because Swalwell opted to run for governor instead of retaining his seat in Congress, there are already seven candidates in the running to replace Swalwell in the 14th Congressional District.

    CalMatters’ Yue Stella Yu contributed to this story.