Nearly 30 of California's community colleges offer bachelor's degree programs. Here's our guide with tips, history, research, and student and other expert voices.
A brief history: In 2014, then-Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill that allowed community colleges a few years to try out bachelor degrees programs. A 2021 assembly bill extended the programs indefinitely and allowed colleges to offer an additional 30 bachelor’s programs per year.
Why it matters: The application process for the bachelor’s degrees at community colleges, while simpler than UC and CSU applications, still require effort and planning. Some programs can get competitive, as most colleges try to maintain a 25-student cohort size.
Keep reading: For more advice on how to take advantage of these programs, including why you need to apply for financial aid.
In my years reporting on community colleges, I never knew that 29 campuses offer bachelor’s degrees (at the time of writing this).
My goal — as a first-generation Latina student — is to receive a degree at one of the UC schools. But, could my life have been different had I known about these degrees? If I knew there were other opportunities to get a bachelor's degree locally, would I still be a journalist? (I like to think I would.) Along with many others, I felt like I was missing out on what these community colleges provide.
So, I interviewed students and faculty to learn more. This guide contains tips, history, research, and student, faculty, and expert voices.
This guide is for everybody: students, educators, co-workers, and everyone in between.
You never know who might want to start or resume their college journey.
How long have these programs been around?
In 2014, then-Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill that allowed community colleges a few years to try out bachelor degrees programs.
I was offered a job transferring bodies at night. And once I started doing that, it was like nothing else.
A state bill passed in 2024 even attempted to make these baccalaureate programs free at community colleges, as an extension of the already existing California Promise Program. (Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed it.)
Profile: Santa Monica College’s interaction design degree
The beach town's local community college, Santa Monica College, offers a bachelor of science in interaction design.
Estimated cost: $10,000. Financial aid and scholarships are available, and their website provides a net price calculator.
Application process: A portfolio of three to five projects is required. The application usually opens about a year before the anticipated start date in the fall.
Cohort size: Twenty-five students are accepted into the year’s cohort — out of the 60 to 90 people who apply on average.
Students in this program (which is also known as IX design) learn to collaborate in groups. The hands-on environment fosters open discussions on how to improve user interaction with technology. Think homepages and app interfaces. When you see an aesthetically pleasing website or app, this is the work of interaction designers.
Christian Enriquez, a 2021 IX program alum, created the company Reality Experience Design. He is one of six “reality designers” who creates augmented reality experiences — think the work of filters on social media, where an animation can be added to your photo. (Another good example is those brown dog ears and long tongue added onto a selfie in real time- for the old-school Snapchat users.)
“It provided my calling,” said Enriquez. “When our company creates experiences, it's well thought out. So, there is research involved, which is crucial when it comes to the stuff that we learn in the program. I know that I'm definitely more successful in this area because of the skills that I learned in that program.”
How much do these degrees cost?
California Community Colleges states that a bachelor’s degree costs $10,560. On most of the community college websites, this number is rounded down to $10,000.
The $10,560 number is determined by the sum of 60 units in lower division courses and 60 units in upper divisions. (We're going to explain units in that infobox two paragraphs down from here.) Californians pay $46 a unit for community college courses. This includes those parts of an associate’s degree or general education — or lower divisions. Courses for a bachelor’s degree (upper division courses) cost more: $130 per unit.
Out-of-state students pay more.
The More You Know: What Is A Unit?
Colleges have a price “per unit.” But: What is a unit? Is that different from a course?
A unit, also called a credit, reflects the amount of class time and work that is expected in a course.
Courses will almost always have a number of units attached to them, usually on a scale of one to five. So, a five-unit course may be longer and more intensive.
Course catalogs provided by each college clearly display the unit numbers.
Bottom line: Apply for financial aid.
“Honestly, it's weird. I think this hasn't happened before; community colleges offering bachelor's degrees,” said Alison Parrales, a senior in the interaction design program at Santa Monica College. “Because many people, the reason why they don't do it is because, maybe they don't have the time, don't have the money. And community colleges are for people who are like that, basically.”
Profile: Cypress College’s funeral service degree
Cypress College, located in north Orange County, offers a bachelor’s of science in funeral service. It is one of three community colleges in the state that offers this degree.
Estimated cost: $10,560. Financial aid and scholarships are available.
Application process: The application opens about ten months before the anticipated start date.
Cohort size: There are typically 20 students per cohort, and the program is almost entirely online.
For students who want to work in the funeral service industry — think embalmers, funeral home directors, cemeterians and more — obtaining a bachelor’s degree allows you to have the possibility for upward mobility and higher paying positions within the field.
Kimberly Worl, a student who graduated in 2022, was part of the pilot program with just five other students in her cohort. She was in the funeral service industry for about 15 years before she started her college journey at Cypress.
“I can't imagine what my life would be like if I didn't find [the funeral service program],” said Worl. “I'm so glad that I was able to further my education in exactly that focused coursework for my job.”
She started by “transferring bodies” from where they died to where they needed to go for funeral services. But prior to getting her degree, there was little room for pay raises.
“I was offered a job transferring bodies at night,” said Worl, who now manages administration for two funeral homes in Westminster Memorial Park and Mortuary. “And once I started doing that, it was like nothing else. It was a huge paradigm shift, because it felt everything that happened was meaningless, and the stuff I was doing at night was super fulfilling, and it meant something to someone. So, I asked for full time work with the funeral home and quit my other job, and then did my embalming apprenticeship, and finally went back to school.”
What should I know before applying?
The application process for the bachelor’s degrees at community colleges, while simpler than UC and CSU applications, still require effort and planning. Some programs can get competitive, as most colleges try to maintain a 25-student cohort size.
(A cohort is what the community colleges call the group of students in the bachelor’s program of that year.)
Research finds that many students who pursue these degrees are already within the community college system, as they build off of pre-existing associates degree programs. But these bachelor’s programs are open for everyone!
Look into the program you want to join at least six months to a year before enrolling.
Check if you need to provide a portfolio of work, or if you are missing any prerequisite courses.
Make an appointment with a community college counselor — for new and returning students.
Profile: West L.A. College’s dental hygiene degree
West LA College is one of five community colleges in the state that offers a baccalaureate degree in dental hygiene. The program has existed at the college since 1969 and became a baccalaureate program in 2016.
Estimated cost: $23,040. This price includes the cost of the individual units for each course, textbooks, required license fees, supplies, and more.
Application process: It opens about six months before the program starts. West L.A. College has applications in both the fall and the spring semester, which is rare for these community colleges.
Cohort size: On average, 35 students are accepted while upwards of 200 students apply.
Students in this program learn the ins and outs of oral healthcare by operating the free clinic on campus. Abigail Martinez, a senior in the program, said that the clinical aspect allows students to go through the motions of what a dental hygienist would do at an appointment.
“They start making the same money as people who have been in a field for 30 years, with the same amount of salary,” said Lisa Kamibayashi, the dental hygiene program director and professor at West LA College for 24 years. “You don't have to move up in dental hygiene, each office makes the same, whether you are 30 years a dental hygienist or fresh out of college.”
The other community colleges with this program are Cerritos College, Foothill College, Fresno College, and Taft College.
How do new programs get established?
In order for these programs to exist, a community college must submit an application to the California Community College Chancellor’s Office where strict criteria is expected to be met: curriculum, enrollment projections, unmet workforce needs, and the curriculum and program itself that does not duplicate a CSU or UC program — to name a few.
This process is necessary for every community college that applies for a bachelor’s program, and once the program is approved, it then needs to be accredited.
Cecilia Rios-Aguilar is a UCLA Education Professor, and co-author of a research study about Latino experience and success post community college bachelor degree program.
“[Students] end up having jobs, you know, in the field that they're studying,” she said. “That's part of why these programs are created. They have to have that component, even from the application, from the design, they're very thoughtfully and intentionally designed so that students can take advantage of jobs that are available locally.”
Some opponents of these degrees at community colleges claim that they take students from four-year universities. Rios-Aguilar disavows this claim, and argues that the community colleges help to serve Black and Latino students — who historically have low baccalaureate degree rates.
“But they're not serving the same students,” Rios-Aguilar said. “If we had done a good job as a state of serving students, they may be competing. The evidence tells us we are not serving a large portion of Californians, ones who need a baccalaureate degree to achieve that upward economic and social mobility.”
What I do if I'm interested?
If this guide piqued your interest — for you or someone else — here are some next steps to get a bachelor’s degree at a community college.
Look into the program you are interested in — online or in person. Whether the degree is related to a field of study you are familiar with or not, bachelor programs are available to everybody. Here's a handy list of all the programs.
Take a tour. Even if your degree is mostly remote, or just two years, it will allow you to learn about your college and make in-person connections.
Book an appointment with a counselor at the college you want to attend! Whether in person or online, counselors are there to help you with the enrollment process. They can let you know what general education courses are needed if you are new to college. They will also fill you in on costs and scholarships unique to the college.
Look into financial aid. Even though these degrees are available at a reduced cost compared to universities, it is still a pretty penny. The Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) is a great place to start.
Get a copy of our zine
Our newest zine.
(
Ross Brenneman
/
LAist
)
We have a limited number of copies of this story as a 12-page zine. If you work for a community college, an academic enrichment program, or community space in the L.A. area and would like to provide copies for your constituents, please reach out to Ross Brenneman, senior editor for our education team. Please note that supply is limited.
Notice any issues?
There is a lot of information to cover. And there are a lot of programs, and things can change fast. Anything important we missed? Spot any problems? Get in touch.
Nick Gerda
is an accountability reporter who has covered local government in Southern California for more than a decade.
Published March 5, 2026 6:23 PM
L.A. County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath (left) and L.A. Mayor Karen Bass speak with each other in July 2024.
(
Myung J. Chun
/
Getty Images
)
Topline:
Two of L.A.’s top elected officials are publicly clashing over one of the public’s top issues — the future of homeless services spending — as city council members weigh pulling $300 million a year out of the troubled L.A. Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA).
The runup: Just after city council members expressed interest Wednesday in having county officials manage the city’s homelessness spending, Mayor Karen Bass issued a statement criticizing the county as “prioritizing bureaucracy rather than services” and urging the council not to redirect the funds too quickly without a plan.
The rebuttal: County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath responded with a statement saying the mayor is “living in the LAHSA twilight zone, where multiple failed audits are better than accountability,” said Horvath, whose district includes a large swath of the city.
‘Wasted’ time: City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez said at Wednesday’s meeting the council had “wasted precious time.”
”This is a leadership failure,” Rodriguez said. “We've wasted precious time. And if you care about the people that are being lost in the street, then you should care to work with urgency and decisive action.”
What’s next: The council’s homelessness committee plans to hold one more discussion in the coming weeks, before deciding next steps. Any changes to funding would have to go to a vote of the full city council.
Two of L.A.’s top elected officials are publicly clashing over one of the public’s top issues — the future of homeless services spending — as city council members weigh pulling $300 million a year out of the troubled L.A. Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA).
It started just after Wednesday’s meeting of the city council’s housing and homelessness committee, where members discussed the possibility of directing the city’s homelessness spending to the county’s new department. Mayor Karen Bass issued a statement urging the council not to redirect the funds too quickly without a plan.
“The county’s decision to establish its own department and withdraw from LAHSA has created a funding and operational gap, which the city must immediately address in order to ensure life-saving services for unhoused Angelenos are not disrupted,” Bass said.
County supervisors decided last April to withdraw their funding — over $300 million a year — from LAHSA and shift it to a new county department starting this July.
“The last thing we need is a new department and more bureaucracy,” the mayor said, adding the county had been “prioritizing bureaucracy rather than services.”
County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath responded shortly after with a statement of her own, saying the mayor “is living in the LAHSA twilight zone.”
“When the mayor created a new program — spending hundreds of millions of your dollars without prior City Council approval — she called it ‘strategic,’” said Horvath, referring to Bass’ Inside Safe program.
“Now, when the County withdraws hundreds of millions of your dollars from an agency that failed multiple audits, she calls it ‘more bureaucracy.’”
Audits released in late 2024 and last spring found LAHSA failed to properly track the hundreds of millions of dollars the city and county entrusted to it per year.
“Angelenos know the truth: The current system doesn’t work,” Horvath’s statement said. A spokesperson for Bass didn’t respond to a request for comment on Horvath’s criticism.
‘Wasted precious time’
Wednesday’s discussion by the homelessness committee came a year after city and county officials received staff reports about potential alternatives to LAHSA.
County supervisors made their decision last April. The city council is about a year behind in starting its discussion of the options.
City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez, who introduced the motion two years ago requesting the city report up for discussion Wednesday, said at the meeting the council had “wasted precious time.”
”This is a leadership failure,” Rodriguez said. “If you care about the people that are being lost in the street, then you should care to work with urgency and decisive action.”
She has criticized the committee’s chair, Nithya Raman, for waiting more than 300 days after the report was finished before bringing it forward for discussion.
Raman did not respond to the criticism during the meeting or in response to a request for comment from LAist.
At Wednesday’s meeting, council members were told in their official staff briefing that the city lacks officials dedicated to homelessness policy and that it would likely take a year and a half to bring oversight of the spending in house to direct city control.
Homelessness Bureau not ready
Bass’ statement pointed to a forthcoming Homelessness Bureau, a team in city government she said will focus on oversight and accountability over homelessness spending.
Raman said the bureau is not yet ready to monitor homelessness spending or advise the council.
“We have not hired a single person for the bureau yet,” said Raman, who championed the bureau a year ago. City council approved the bureau’s funding nine months ago, for the fiscal year starting last July.
How to reach me
If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is ngerda.47.
You can follow this link to reach me there or type my username in the search bar after starting a new chat.
And if you're comfortable just reaching out my email I'm at ngerda@scpr.org
Rodriguez criticized the council’s decision last spring to pursue the bureau instead of discussing options to shift funding from LAHSA. The bureau, she added, still does not have “ an overarching goal, which addresses the concerns around governance” of homelessness dollars.
Raman recently announced she’s running for mayor against Bass, something Horvath openly considered but opted not to do. She is instead running for re-election as supervisor.
The committee plans to hold one more discussion in the coming weeks, before deciding next steps. Any changes to funding would have to go to a vote of the full city council.
Makenna Sievertson
covers the daily drumbeat of Southern California with a focus on the housing and homelessness challenges confronting some of our most vulnerable residents.
Published March 5, 2026 5:09 PM
The line outside The Original Pantry Cafe on its last day
(
Dañiel Martinez
/
LAist
)
Topline:
The historic Original Pantry Cafe in downtown Los Angeles is reopening under a new partnership with homelessness nonprofit Hope the Mission.
Why now: The more than 100-year-old diner on Figueroa Street is expected to open in May or June in collaboration with the North Hills-based organization that provides meals, shelter and services to people experiencing homelessness.
The backstory: When The Pantry first announced its closure last March, thousands of Angelenos from its loyal multi-generational customer base flocked to the restaurant for one last meal.
Why it matters: But now, the greasy spoon will start serving customers again under a new model. All profits will go toward supporting the unhoused community, according to Ken Craft, founder and CEO.
Read on ... for more about the reopening.
The historic Original Pantry Cafe in downtown Los Angeles is reopening under a new partnership with nonprofit Hope the Mission.
The more than 100-year-old diner on Figueroa Street is expected to open in May or June in collaboration with the North Hills-based organization that provides meals, shelter and services to people experiencing homelessness.
When The Pantry first announced its closure last March, thousands of Angelenos from its loyal multi-generational customer base flocked to the restaurant for one last meal.
But now, the greasy spoon will start serving customers again under a new model. All profits will go toward supporting the unhoused community, according to Ken Craft, founder and CEO.
“This creates an opportunity for people to know 'I'm going to go enjoy an incredible meal at an iconic location in Los Angeles, and it's going to be doing good for the city of Los Angeles,'” Craft told LAist.
What’s new
Hope the Mission isn’t a total stranger to food service.
The organization provides nearly 9,000 meals each day and operates 33 shelters and interim housing sites in the region, including five shelters within a few miles of The Pantry.
One of its mottos is that everybody and everything gets a second chance — the historic diner included.
“It is very symbolic of the work that we do where oftentimes lives get beat down, they get worn out and they feel like their usefulness is done,” Craft said. “And so I look at The Pantry and I say, ‘No, your best years are yet to come.’"
The tagline of The Pantry when it reopens under the new partnership will be “a second serving”, as a nod to that second chance.
But the nostalgic draw of the diner is not lost on Craft.
The Original Pantry Cafe in 1979.
(
William Reagh
/
Los Angeles Photographers Photo Collection
)
The Original Pantry Cafe, on the northwest corner of Figueroa and 9th streets, in 1978.
(
Security Pacific National Bank Photo Collection
/
Courtesy L.A. Public Library
)
He said Hope the Mission is going to honor the history and legacy of the space (logo and several layers of flooring included) while giving it a new lease on life.
The organization’s chefs have been working on an updated menu. Craft said it’ll include some of the classic food customers came to love, including pancakes and hash browns, along with a new dessert line and some healthier options.
The overall goal is to replicate the feeling people had when they ate at The Pantry decades ago, with the same style and much of the same staff, while the diner evolves into the next philanthropic chapter. Craft said he wants to make sure The Original Pantry Cafe gets back on the map.
“Not only will you get an amazing meal and a wonderful experience, you're going to be actually investing back into the community,” he said.
The counter was full on The Pantry's last day open in March 2025.
(
Dañiel Martinez
/
LAist
)
The scene on the last day of The Pantry's operation in March 2025.
(
Dañiel Martinez
/
LAist
)
Officials are working to reopen The Pantry between May 1 and June 1, Craft said. All the business’ profits will go toward supporting people experiencing homelessness through Hope the Mission’s shelters, services and meal programs.
What’s old
Kurt Petersen, the co-president of UNITE HERE Local 11, the union representing the restaurant’s workers, told LAist they’ve come to an agreement with Hope the Mission so that all the staff who lost their jobs when The Pantry closed will be able to return to their previous positions.
Petersen said the union also reached an agreement that will provide free family health insurance, legal services and training funds for those workers.
“The folks who've been there 10, 20, 30, 40 years — they're really listening to them about what this needs to be in order to be a beloved institution going forward for Angelenos, “ he said.
“At the same time, they have some thoughts about how it should be run and hopefully the marriage of those two concepts will bring The Pantry forward so that it'll be open another 100 years,” Petersen continued.
José Moran, who worked at The Pantry for more than 45 years, told LAist he’s excited to start serving Angelenos again.
José Moran said he's "very happy" to be going back to work at The Pantry.
(
Courtesy UNITE HERE Local 11
)
“I feel great, I feel very happy,” Moran said. “I never thought I was going to work again there.”
Moran described the restaurant staff as a “family” — both figuratively and literally. His brother, Jesus, also worked at The Pantry a little longer than José.
Moran said he’s been missing his brother since they stopped seeing each other every day when the diner closed. But now, they’re both looking forward to coming back to the greasy spoon.
José and Jesus Moran were both servers at The Pantry for more than 45 years. José Moran said they're both looking forward to returning for the reopening.
(
Courtesy UNITE HERE Local 11
)
How we got here
The diner shut its doors last year after more than a century of serving breakfast staples.
The owner at the time, the Richard J. Riordan Administrative Trust, told LAist’s media partner CBS LA that the restaurant was never profitable and that selling the property would help keep the foundation’s charitable mission. The trust took over ownership after former L.A. Mayor Richard Riordan, who bought the restaurant in 1981, died a few years ago.
But UNITE HERE Local 11 said the trust abruptly closed the diner after staff insisted that any new owners must protect their jobs and honor the union.
Kurt Petersen, the co-president of UNITE HERE Local 11, said the staff who lost their jobs when The Pantry closed will be able to return to their previous positions.
(
Courtesy UNITE HERE Local 11
)
“I saw some of the guys crying, and because, you know, we all got families and we have to support them,” Moran said. “I know how they were feeling, because I was feeling too the same. At the beginning, that was very sad.”
Last September, the union announced a “landmark agreement” with the new owner, Leo Pustilnikov, who’s also a real estate developer.
Petersen said because the staff fought for their jobs with the support of residents and city officials, they are now going back to work with an operator and owner who share the mission that The Pantry needs to be one of the great restaurants in Los Angeles.
“So this is all good news,” Petersen said. “and God knows we need good news right now.”
Pustilnikov told the Los Angeles Times last fall that he planned to reopen The Pantry on New Year’s Eve, pending the necessary permits and licenses. Petersen said there were some delays when a car crashed into the building shorty after.
Pustilnikov didn’t immediately respond to LAist’s request for comment.
How to get involved
Hope the Mission is also launching a fundraising campaign with opportunities for the community to support The Pantry’s reopening.
There are various donation levels, with people giving $100,000 or more getting the chance to name a drink or item from the menu. Craft said they’ve already had a few takers.
Gifts of $50,000 or more will get to sponsor a booth at the diner, with the donor's name or business displayed on the table.
People who donate $5,000 or more will have their name permanently displayed on a sign inside The Pantry.
“We're looking to the business community and people that love L.A. to partner with us in helping to make sure that it's a successful launch,” Craft said.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
Josie Huang
is a reporter and Weekend Edition host who spotlights the people and places at the heart of our region.
Published March 5, 2026 2:51 PM
A server bank at a data center, this one in Quincy, Wash.
(
Megan Farmer
/
KUOW
)
Topline:
Monterey Park voters will decide in June whether to ban data centers after the City Council voted last night to place the measure on the ballot. The council also directed staff to draft a city ban and extended a temporary moratorium on data center development.
The backstory: The council’s actions follow months of backlash from residents who said they learned late last year — largely through word of mouth and social media — about plans for a 250,000-square-foot data center in a local business park.
Residents' concerns: Locals worry a large data center could bring high energy use and noise, degrade the environment and offer limited economic benefit.
What's next: The council's vote sets up a potential legal clash between the city and HMC StratCap, which has threatened litigation over the council’s efforts to block such projects.
Monterey Park voters will decide in June whether to ban data centers citywide, setting up a potential legal battle with the developer behind a proposed project.
The City Council on Wednesday unanimously approved placing a measure on the June ballot that would ask voters to amend the city’s General Plan to prohibit the facilities.
The council, also by unanimous vote, directed staff to begin drafting a city ordinance banning data centers ahead of the June election that could potentially take effect before then. It also extended a 45-day moratorium on data center development to January 2027.
City Attorney Karl Berger said the multi-prong approach would give Monterey Park the strongest legal footing.
“I like the belt, suspenders and girdle approach to most things just to make sure that everything's buckled down,” Berger said.
The council votes come after months of mounting resident outrage over a proposal to build a 250,000-square-foot data center in a business park — a project they fear would bring high energy use, noise and limited economic benefit.
Developer HMC StratCap has threatened litigation over the council’s moves toward banning data centers.
On Wednesday, before the council voted, Bryan Marsh, an HMC StratCap executive, gave public comment to boos from the audience, saying the company purchased the land in December 2024 after the “city provided assurances about the viability of data center development.”
He urged the city to work with the company on finding “alternative land uses” for the property.
“Forcing a ballot proposition with a special election in June 2026 severely degrades our ability to work together,” Marsh said.
The council appeared unmoved. Berger, the city attorney, said the developer currently does not appear to have a legally vested project.
There is an application on file, he said, but no public hearing has been scheduled. Berger added he had been authorized by the council to initiate litigation against HMC StratCap if the company were to file suit.
Opponents of the data center rejoiced over Wednesday’s votes and expressed relief that they had mobilized against the project before HMC StratCap’s application had advanced any further.
“The City Council has listened and is listening,” said Hrag Balian, a resident who helped found the group No Data Center in Monterey Park! “ I feel very optimistic that data centers are going to be banned from Monterey Park in the foreseeable near future.”
South Pas residents raise alarm about surveillance
Libby Rainey
is a general assignment reporter. She covers the news that shapes Los Angeles and how people change the city in return.
Published March 5, 2026 2:48 PM
Residents gathered in South Pasadena this week to tell the city council to cancel its contracts with Flock Safety.
(
Libby Rainey
/
LAist
)
Topline:
South Pasadena residents are urging their city council to end its contracts with Flock Safety, the controversial surveillance company that operates AI-powered automated license plate readers in thousands of communities across the U.S., including many in California. They're part of a growing movement.
How other communities are responding: Santa Cruz killed its contract with Flock in January following reports that the city's data was accessed by agencies outside of California and shared with ICE. Last month, Mountain View Police Department shut off its Flock cameras after an audit found that federal agencies had accessed its data in 2024. The Oxnard Police Department also suspended its use of Flock license plate readers last week.
Keep reading ... for more on how Flock works, what California law says and the decision ahead for the city of South Pasadena.
A group in South Pasadena gathered Wednesday to urge their city council to end its contracts with Flock Safety, the controversial surveillance company that operates AI-powered automated license plate readers in thousands of communities across the U.S., including many in California.
The small town has 27 Flock cameras that monitor the cars that come and go in the community of around 25,000 people — one of the highest densities in the region, according to the mayor. That information is temporarily stored in a database that's shared with law enforcement agencies across the state.
"I’m deeply concerned for the safety of our community. Flock has proven to be careless with our data," Olivia Ramirez, a South Pasadena resident, told the city council in public comment Wednesday. “Continuing to work with Flock will erode public trust and, as a consequence, will harm public safety.”
The speakers are part of a growing movement, as residents across California push local law enforcement and city governments to reconsider their ties with the Flock over concerns about surveillance and how their data could be used in the federal government's mass deportation campaign.
How other communities are responding
Santa Cruz killed its contract with Flock in January following reports that the city's data was accessed by agencies outside of California and shared with ICE. Last month, Mountain View Police Department shut off its Flock cameras after an audit found that federal agencies had accessed its data in 2024. Other local governments in the Bay Area have followed suit.
The Oxnard Police Department also suspended its use of Flock license plate readers last week, after an audit revealed that data from the city's cameras was made available to federal law enforcement agencies between February and March of 2025 through a "nationwide query" setting, against the city's wishes and state law. A California law prohibits sharing license plate reader data with agencies outside of the state.
Flock acknowledged the incident in a blog post this week, saying that out-of-state law enforcement agencies' access to some of its camera networks was "inadvertent" and it was not possible in some cases to determine the cause.
The post also said that Flock had strengthened its protections, including by excluding federal agencies from national and statewide lookup networks, and implementing guardrails that keep California agencies from accepting or initiating data sharing with federal agencies or out of state entities.
"Flock sincerely regrets the confusion and mistrust this has created within several communities," the blog post reads. "Flock takes full accountability for this situation, and has made changes and improvements to significantly enhance agency ability to effortlessly comply with applicable laws, regulations, and community norms that govern information sharing."
That wasn't good enough for Sam Gurley, who rallied with his neighbors in South Pasadena on Wednesday night.
“It isn't until they get caught that they say, 'Hey, I know that this is a law in California. We got caught, let's fix it,'" said Gurley, who said he became alarmed when he learned that Flock cameras were deployed. " Now that I have a better understanding of how the system, the city use and share this data with each other, I'm more terrified than I've ever been."
How Flock works
Flock has contracts with more than 5,000 law enforcement agencies around the nation that use its cameras and license plate readers. The cameras are sometimes attached to street poles — including one on Fair Oaks Avenue in South Pasadena near the entrance to the 110 Freeway, where cars streamed by the nondescript camera under a small solar panel on Wednesday evening.
There are 27 Flock cameras installed around the city of South Pasadena.
(
Libby Rainey
/
LAist
)
Flock cameras "continuously scan and record images" of vehicles' license plates numbers, color, and make, according to a report put together by city staff in South Pasadena. The cameras record the date, time and GPS location every time a car passes by. According to Flock's website, the cameras also pick up other identifying features of cars, like stickers and roof racks.
The technology automatically cross references license plate numbers with law enforcement databases and alerts the police department if it detects a vehicle connected with a criminal investigation, according to the report.
Flock's database also allows law enforcement agencies to search the location of vehicles outside of their own city. Flock stores the data for 30 days and then automatically deletes it, although cities can adjust the length of time they retain the data. Flock emphasized to NPR that cities control how the data they collect is shared.
Law enforcement agencies have hailed the technology for helping them locate suspects and stolen vehicles. At a February city council meeting, South Pasadena Sergeant Andy DuBois called the Flock cameras a "force multiplier" for officers trying to solve crimes.
" It allows agencies to share relevant information in a secure and regulated way. By participating in this network, we benefit from broader technological coverage without needing to add additional staffing," DuBois said.
Nick Hidalgo, senior staff attorney with ACLU of Northern California who has done work on automated license plate readers for years, called the technology a "dragnet.”
"What they are collecting is a person's location — because any license plate information can be connected very easily to a driver," he said. "You can capture a ton of information about where a person lives, works, etc. We're talking about truly sensitive information here."
A deeper look at the law
In California, state law SB 34 prohibits agencies from sharing information gathered by automated license plate readers with out-of-state and federal agencies. Police departments also must keep a record of their queries of the system. Another state law, SB 54, limits California law enforcement agencies from assisting with immigration enforcement.
"The majority of California law enforcement agencies collect and use images captured by ALPR cameras, but few have appropriate usage and privacy policies in place," a press release from Bonta's office said at the time.
Last year, Bonta sued the city of El Cajon in San Diego County, saying it had shared data from its system of Flock automated license plate reader cameras with more than 100 out-of-state law enforcement agencies. The mayor of that city responded with defiance, saying it shares data with other states because "crime doesn't stop at the border."
Flock Safety says that it does not work with ICE or any agency within the Department of Homeland Security. It also emphasizes that it is local agencies that own the data that their cameras collect, not Flock.
South Pasadena faces a deadline
The city of South Pasadena pays around $83,000 annually for two contracts with Flock – one which sunsets this month, on March 19. The council has until March 18 to decide whether or not to auto-renew the contract for two more years.
If the city decides to terminate the contract, it will have to repay a federal grant of around $45,000 it used to install 14 cameras. The city could also decide to end its second contract with Flock before its March, 2027 end date. That would cost the city a $6,500 termination fee, but it would receive a refund for the unused days of service, according to a city report.
South Pasadena Mayor Sheila Rossi told LAist that she's concerned about Flock's system and reports about data being shared out of the state of California. She also told the city council in February that South Pasadena had a far higher density of cameras than many surrounding communities, saying it reached "the category of surveillance."
South Pasadena says it's implementing changes to its camera policies, including requiring monthly audits of how the system is queried and requiring agents that search the data include a case number.
Councilmembers in February also raised the idea of reducing their system's data retention to less than 30 days. The state of New Hampshire requires law enforcement agencies to delete automated license plate reader data after three minutes if it does not yield a hit with criminal investigations.
Rossi said the council will look into options including contracting with other automated license plate readers and canceling one of the city contracts with Flock.
" Cities have a responsibility to make sure the safeguards around these tools keep pace," she said.
Susan Seager, a First Amendment lawyer and South Pasadena resident, said she wants the cameras gone, period.
" I don't trust Flock and I don't trust our federal government, and I want to be able to trust our local police department," she said. "I don't think our little small city should be part of that surveillance state."
