Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Service, hospital workers butt heads with system
    A man with medium skin tone and short dark hair smiles holds up a picket sign. He is clad in gray slacks and a black shirt. Behind him, his co-workers also hold up signs.
    AFSCME member José Pérez, who participated in a two-day strike last November, has worked at UC Irvine’s medical center for nearly a decade.

    Topline:

    The union that represents more than 42,000 service and hospital workers across the University of California has announced plans to stage an open-ended strike at all campuses next month, starting May 14.

    Why it matters: The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees local 3299 (AFSCME) includes custodians, food service workers, patient care assistants and hospital technicians. The results of the contract negotiations—which have been going on for over two years—could have a meaningful impact on their quality of life. Moreover, a systemwide strike could impact UC students, faculty and hospital patients.

    Why now: The union has filed unfair labor practice charges with the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB), formally accusing the UC system of violating California labor law. According to AFSCME, one of the charges stems from UC’s “refusal to bargain over housing aid for its workers.” The other takes issue with the system’s “imposition of contract terms,” including higher healthcare rates.

    What the union says: Members say their wages have failed to keep pace with inflation, and that they’ve been priced out of local housing markets. Some members commute “three hours each way” to get to work, while others are “sleeping in their cars or living in homeless shelters,” said union spokesperson Todd Stenhouse.

    What the UC says: “ We're disappointed that AFSCME is moving towards this open-ended strike, despite the real progress that we've made at the bargaining table,” said Heather Hansen, a spokesperson for the university system. “We recognize that many employees are facing real pressures related to housing, commuting, and the high cost of living …That's why we've made the generous offers that we have.”

    Go deeper: UC nursing union scores a new deal, and another union goes on strike

    The union that represents more than 42,000 service and hospital workers across the University of California has announced plans to stage an open-ended strike at all campuses next month, starting May 14.

    The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees local 3299 (AFSCME) has been negotiating with the university system for over two years.

    The union’s membership includes custodians, food service workers, patient care assistants and hospital technicians. Members say their wages have failed to keep pace with inflation, and that they’ve been priced out of local housing markets.

    Todd Stenhouse, a spokesperson for the union, underscored that strikes “ involve great sacrifice for workers.” He also noted that its members “are overwhelmingly women and people of color.”

    AFSCME members “love the university,” he added. But to continue working for the UC, some workers have to drive “ three hours each way.” Other members “are sleeping in their cars or living in homeless shelters,” he said.

    “To say that these workers feel undervalued and insulted would be an understatement,” Stenhouse said. “At a certain point in time, you have to just say: ‘Enough.’”

    What is the basis for the strike?

    The union has filed unfair labor practice charges with the Public Employment Relations Board, formally accusing the UC system of violating California labor law.

    AFSCME charges the university system with:

    Here’s what AFSCME is bargaining for.

    What is UC’s position?

    In a press statement, the UC system said it has exchanged proposals on wages, health care and working conditions with the union, “reaching agreement on 26 contract articles to date.”

    “ We're disappointed that AFSCME is moving toward this open-ended strike, despite the real progress that we've made at the bargaining table,” said Heather Hansen, a spokesperson for the university system.

    “We recognize that many employees are facing real pressures related to housing, commuting, and the high cost of living,” she added. “That's why we've made the generous offers that we have.”

    Hansen said the UC’s proposals include wage increases of 32% or more through 2029, “which means more money in the employee's pockets right away, with continued increases over time.”

    The road ahead

    Stenhouse said the UC system is touting “fuzzy math.” More than a third of the proposed wage increases, he said, “ are not even applicable to all workers.”

    When asked about the unfair labor practice charges filed by the union, Hansen said that “just because AFSCME has filed these charges doesn't mean that [they have] merit. And we disagree with some of the characterizations that they've made.” In the end, she added, it is PERB who will decide whether the charges stand muster.

    Last fall, the union staged a two-day strike. If AFSCME decides to carry out the open-ended work stoppage this spring, Hansen said, “ We have robust contingency plans in place to ensure patients, students, and staff members and faculty are minimally impacted.”

    Julia Barajas is a part-time graduate student at UCLA Law.

  • Bass and Raman lay out environmental platforms
    Two women in suit jackets hold mics and gesture as the address an audience.
    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass and Councilmember Nithya Raman separately explain their environmental positions at a mayoral forum held Thursday at L.A. Trade Tech in downtown Los Angeles.

    Topline:

    The two candidates for L.A. mayor defended their environmental records and painted two different pictures of the city on Thursday during a forum on climate and environment issues.

    The details: Incumbent Mayor Karen Bass and City Councilmember Nithya Raman each answered questions separately about how they would approach many environmental challenges facing the city, including emergency preparedness, water resiliency and transportation policy.

    The takeaways: Bass said L.A. has made solid progress on transitioning to clean energy and other environmental challenges, while Raman argued the city has fallen behind. Bass defended her role in the city’s response to the Palisades and Boyle Heights warehouse fires, while Raman criticized it for lacking effective guidance and communication for victims.

    Read on…for more takeaways from the forum.

    With a little more than two months to go until the general election, the two mayoral candidates running to lead the city of Los Angeles fielded questions about the environment at a Thursday night forum hosted by LAist.

    Incumbent Karen Bass and her challenger, L.A. City Councilmember Nithya Raman, each answered questions separately about how they would approach many environmental challenges facing the city, including emergency preparedness, water resiliency and transportation policy.

    These and other environmental and climate issues are top of mind for many Angelenos during a summer marked by extreme heat, humidity and the Lineage warehouse fire in Boyle Heights that affected surrounding neighborhoods for months. Communities are also still rebuilding from last year’s destructive Eaton and Palisades fires.

    The forum, held at Los Angeles Trade Technical-College, was organized by the L.A. League of Conservation Voters, SCOPE-LA, Sierra Club, Clean and Healthy California, Neighborhood Council Sustainability Alliance and Communities for a Better Environment, and was moderated by LAist climate and environment Reporter Erin Stone.

    Here are three takeaways from the event:

    Differing visions of LA

    Bass, who was elected mayor in 2022, painted a picture of an L.A. that’s made significant progress on environmental issues during that time, while Raman said the city has stalled under Bass’ leadership.

    Bass referenced her work transitioning the city off of coal-generated energy and expanding the city’s electric bus fleets and clean-energy jobs. She said she wants to build on that momentum, particularly with a focus on helping communities impacted by environmental and industrial pollution.

    She pointed to many communities of color that bear the brunt of industrial pollution, including in South L.A. neighborhoods dotted with oil wells and residents who live in close proximity to the Lineage warehouse in Boyle Heights.

    “Where we need to go now in the future is focusing on environmental justice, focusing on the communities that are disproportionately impacted by greenhouse gases and by the environment,” she said.

    Raman also talked about a need to focus on environmental justice, but she said environmental programs are underfunded and understaffed, and that she would invest more in them if she becomes mayor.

    She said Bass’ administration has not prioritized environmental climate issues enough, and that there should be a more aggressive policy around them.

    “Too much of that work remains unfinished,” she said. “Our transition to clean energy has slowed. Efforts to build a resilient water supply, close neighborhood drilling sites, make our streets safer, all of these have slowed over the last four years.”

    Raman specifically called out Bass for her proposal to cut funding for the Climate Emergency Mobilization Office as the city faced a billion-dollar budget shortfall last year.

    Bass defended the proposal, arguing the program had not developed a climate action plan as directed and needed to be revamped.

    The office has shrunk under Bass’ leadership, and she removed the city’s chief heat officer and quietly appointed a new one earlier this year.

    Emergency response failures

    Both Bass and Raman said L.A. has room for improvement when it comes to preparing for fires, earthquakes and other disasters.

    Raman criticized the city’s response to last year’s Palisades Fire, saying there was no clear leadership to guide the community through the recovery effort. She pointed to Bass' appointment of Steve Soboroff to head the recovery. He left the post after his three-month term and was not replaced.

     ”What we saw in the Palisades, I think, was an example of what shouldn't happen,” Raman said. “ A lot of residents in the Palisades have been feeling like they don't know who to reach out to, who is the person that they need to connect with in order to make sure that recovery really happens.”

    But she defended her administration’s response, and said confusion over city and state land made it more difficult.

     ”Part of the brush was the city, part of the brush was the state. There was a reluctance to go into state territory because our folks were told they couldn't do that,” Bass said. “As far as I'm concerned, that's not gonna happen again.”

    Bass said the biggest impediments to the recovery process — and to people moving back into their homes — are insurance companies and banks. She called for legislative reforms to the insurance process.

    Raman also criticized the response to the Lineage warehouse fire in Boyle Heights this summer, calling out Bass directly for sharing misleading information about air quality.

    Bass said she relied on inaccurate information from public health and air quality management officials.

    Both candidates said there’s a need for stronger enforcement and higher fines that could be levied against corporations like Lineage, the warehouse owner, and better planning for emergencies around industrial buildings.

    Shared goals

    Although the candidates leaned into their differences, the reality is that they align on many climate and environmental policies.

    Unhoused Angelenos are especially at risk from extreme heat, and Bass said the city needs to provide more places for them to cool off.

    “My plan, priority one, is to get people off the streets,” Bass said, adding that during heat emergencies that needs to include providing emergency shelters and other ways to cool off.

    Raman talked about similar solutions.

    “ Responding to people who are experiencing homelessness to ensure that they're actually able to get indoors and off the streets, so that they're not dying from exposure to heat, because that is a very, very high risk that people who are experiencing homelessness face,” she said.

    They had other shared goals.

    Both said incentives and rebates that keep down the cost of utility bills need to be more accessible, especially in low-income communities.

    Both called for more severe penalties for owners of industrial sites like the Boyle Heights warehouse.

    And they both said they want to grow the city’s electric vehicle fleet, and decrease car use by building more public transit ridership and expanding biking infrastructure.

  • Sponsored message
  • Harmful algal bloom confirmed in Riverside County
    A boat on a lake with green algae.
    A boat motors through green water during a harmful algal bloom in at Lake Elsinore, in 2022. Now another Riverside County lake, Lake Hemet, is reporting issues.

    Topline:

    Visitors and residents are being warned to avoid swimming in another Lake Hemet heading into the long Labor Day weekend.

    The details: State water officials confirmed a harmful algal bloom there is showing up as green, cloudy discolored water, scum and algae.

    What's next: You can check California’s map to see if any harmful algal blooms have been reported in the area.

    Topline:

    Visitors and residents are being warned to avoid swimming in another Southern California lake heading into the long Labor Day weekend.

    The details: State water officials confirmed a harmful algal bloom in Lake Hemet that’s showing up as green, cloudy discolored water, scum and algae.

    Why it matters: The bloom can produce toxins that could cause you and your furry friends to get sick. People and pets are being urged to stay out of the water and away from any scum or algae along the shore. Dogs and children are especially vulnerable because they’re more likely to swallow water while playing and swimming, according to the State Water Resources Control Board. You can learn more about healthy water habits here.

    Why now: The warning for the Riverside County lake comes about a week after a similar alert was issued for Big Bear Lake. Lake Hemet is under an advisory until further notice, state officials said.

    The backstory: Harmful algal blooms are most common in California between the warmer months of late May through October, although they can pop up year round, according to the board.

    What's next: You can check California’s map to see if any harmful algal blooms have been reported in the area.

    Go deeper: What's the green sheen on Big Bear Lake? What you need to know about harmful algal blooms

  • High quality affordable sushi and sake
    A man holds up a tuna head, as he goes through the process of cutting the fish, with an audience in attendance.
    Photo from Yama Sushi Marketplace's Koreatown grand opening

    Top line:

    Started by a local fish broker, Yama Sushi Marketplace has become a one-stop shop for Japanese culture. Current owner Scott Kohno talks about how they've grown the operation from San Gabriel to additional locations in Koreatown and West L.A.

    Expanding to craft sake: Co-owner Wendy Kohno, who is a professional sake sommelier, has helped add a selection of over 200 sake options.

    Upcoming event: Yama Sushi Marketplace is co-hosting American Craft Sake Fest, happening in West L.A., on Saturday, Sept.10.

    Read more... to learn how the business keeps the food quality high while keeping prices lower than you might think.

    Yama Sushi Marketplace is a local chain that helps set the standard for quality sushi and Japanese cuisine in Los Angeles — all while trying to keep prices more affordable than you might expect.

    About the owners

    Kenzo Yamada opened the business in 1984 after working as a local fish broker. He eventually sold the business in 2021 to Scott Kohno and his family. Kohno sat down with Austin Cross, who hosts AirTalk every Friday, to explain how they've continued to deliver quality sushi and expand the business.

    Making Japanese culture accessible and affordable

    A man holds up a tuna head, as he goes through the process of cutting the fish, with an audience in attendance.
    Yama Sushi Marketplace's Koreatown grand opening.
    (
    Courtesy Alysia Rodriguez
    )

    Yama Sushi Marketplace looks to provide the best of both worlds — high-quality sushi lower costs — in serving customers.

    How do they do it? They've benefited from Yamada's connections, sourcing quality fish through trusted suppliers like Bluefiná. It also helps that it's not a restaurant, minimizing the overhead costs that come with staffing.

    Restaurant details

    • The Kohno family has expanded to West L.A. and Koreatown. A fourth location is set to open in Sherman Oaks, although its official opening date hasn’t been announced.
    • Co-owner Wendy Kohno has a background as a kikisake-shi — sake sommelier — and has helped build out the market’s selection of more than 200 sakes, most of which you can find at their San Gabriel and West L.A. locations.
    • They also have classes on sushi, sake and miso.

    What we tried

    • California Roll (their most popular menu item)
    • Bara Chirashi
    • Yama Deluxe Platter
    • Narumi Sake (Yama's own craft sake)

    Yama Sushi Marketplace is co-hosting American Craft Sake Fest on Saturday, Sept. 10. Click here for more details.

    How to visit

    • Address:
      • San Gabriel location — 911 W Las Tunas Dr., San Gabriel, CA 91776
      • West LA location — 11709 National Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90064
      • Koreatown location — 3178 W. Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90006
    • Hours: All three businesses are open every day from 11 a.m. to 8 p.m.
    • Cost: A six-piece California roll costs $7.39; sushi platters range from $49 to $114.95.

    What should we try next?

    Have a question or comment about a segment? Want to pitch us a story?

    Fill out the form below, and please include an email address so we're able to follow up if necessary! We're not able to respond to every inquiry, but all submissions are read and reviewed by our production team.

  • Last minute fix gives hundreds a path forward
    A man with light skin tone and a beard, wearing a charcoal flat hat cap, flannel shirt, speaks while sitting at a table. There are people next to him and in the foreground also sitting out of focus.
    Paul Duncan, Long Beach's homeless services bureau manager, speaking at the city's Homeless Services Advisory Committee on Wednesday, April 1.

    Topline:

    After months of fear about dwindling federal funding for a pandemic-era housing assistance program, Long Beach housing officials say they have secured enough money to keep nearly 500 households from potentially falling back into homelessness.

    Why now: The last-minute announcement saves the city from what would have been the worst-case scenario: having to kick hundreds of formerly homeless people off of federal housing assistance. The situation illustrates just how dependent Long Beach’s homelessness and health services are on state and federal funding, which has stagnated or been cut in recent years.

    Why it matters: Long Beach officials thought they would run out of money to pay rental subsidies for the 480 households currently on Emergency Housing Vouchers as early as this month, but they now say they have the time — and money — to transition all of those households to other rental assistance programs by November.

    Read on... for more on the vouchers.

    This story first appeared on Long Beach Post.

    After months of fear about dwindling federal funding for a pandemic-era housing assistance program, Long Beach housing officials say they have secured enough money to keep nearly 500 households from potentially falling back into homelessness.

    The last-minute announcement saves the city from what would have been the worst-case scenario: having to kick hundreds of formerly homeless people off of federal housing assistance. The situation illustrates just how dependent Long Beach’s homelessness and health services are on state and federal funding, which has stagnated or been cut in recent years.

    Long Beach officials thought they would run out of money to pay rental subsidies for the 480 households currently on Emergency Housing Vouchers as early as this month, but they now say they have the time — and money — to transition all of those households to other rental assistance programs by November.

    An estimated $480,000 increase in federal funding for Long Beach, cost-saving measures and help from a neighboring housing authority made that possible, according to a city memo.

    The Emergency Housing Voucher program was a one-of-a-kind opportunity for people defined as “chronically homeless” or at risk of losing their housing to have a slew of services paid for to get them housing. That included security deposits, moving costs and paying past utility debt.

    Long Beach quickly used all 582 vouchers allocated to it.

    The swift spending gave people like Clark Inglish, a new mother living on the Los Angeles River, a streamlined and effective way to get back on their feet, according to local health officials. The program “really changed my life,” said Inglish, who was able to start working as a counselor and put her son in preschool after getting a roof over her head.

    The vouchers were supposed to be good through 2030, but when rent rates increased more quickly than anticipated, the program ran out of money years ahead of schedule, and in April last year, the Department of Housing and Urban Development notified housing officials that Congress did not allocate new funding for it.

    Instead, a last-second increase in federal dollars to a different housing program will allow the Long Beach Housing Authority to transfer 400 households from EHVs to Housing Choice Vouchers – also known as Section 8.

    HUD will also give Long Beach’s housing authority an additional $1,000 for each EHV voucher that they convert to Section 8.

    The 80 remaining households on EHVs will receive assistance from the Housing Authority of the city of Los Angeles.

    Over the next few months, housing officials will assist each household with completing the paperwork necessary to make the transition.

    If you’re on an Emergency Housing Voucher and have a question, you can email the city at HA-EHV@longbeach.gov.