Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Oversight Committee expected to get files today
    A person's hand points to a mug shot on a poster titled U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein.
    The chairman of the House Oversight Committee says the Justice Department will begin sharing files related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation starting on Friday. Above, federal prosecutors announce charges against Epstein on July 8, 2019 in New York City.

    Topline:

    The House Oversight Committee is expecting to get hundreds of documents today related to the Justice Department's investigation into the Jeffrey Epstein case.

    Why it matters: The release will mark the first wave of files to be sent to the committee in response to a congressional subpoena issued earlier this month calling on the DOJ to provide records from its probe of the convicted sex-offender and his longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell.
    What's next: Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., has said at least some of those files will eventually be made public.

    The House Oversight Committee is expecting to get hundreds of documents on Friday related to the Justice Department's investigation into the Jeffrey Epstein case.

    The release will mark the first wave of files to be sent to the committee in response to a congressional subpoena issued earlier this month calling on the DOJ to provide records from its probe of the convicted sex-offender and his longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell.

    Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., has said at least some of those files will eventually be made public.

    "We're going to be transparent. We're doing what we said we would do. We're getting the documents," Comer told reporters on Capitol Hill this week. "And I believe the White House will work with us."

    The handling of the Epstein case represents a delicate dance for congressional Republicans. On the one hand, they're navigating pressure for more transparency from their base. On the other hand, the release risks exposing potentially embarrassing details about the government's handling of the Epstein investigation, as well as President Trump's own past ties to the disgraced financier. Trump has long maintained his friendship with Epstein ended before he was indicted for soliciting prostitution in 2006.


    Earlier this month, Comer issued 11 subpoenas seeking the DOJ files, as well as testimony from high-profile witnesses. In addition to Maxwell, the list includes former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, as well as top law enforcement officials from previous administrations, including former FBI Directors James Comey and Robert Mueller and former Attorneys General Merrick Garland and Bill Barr.

    Epstein died by suicide in prison six years ago this month while waiting to go on trial on sex trafficking charges — fueling conspiracy theories of a cover-up.

    On the campaign trail, Trump and other Republicans promised to release the Epstein files if they came to power. But the administration has been facing blowback since July, when Attorney General Pam Bondi said the Justice Department and the FBI had found no evidence that Epstein had a "client list" or that he blackmailed prominent associates.

    The committee's review

    Comer told reporters on Capitol Hill this week he wasn't sure what the committee would receive from the Justice Department on Friday. But he said he expected there would be a lot to review.

    "I'm confident there are hundreds and hundreds of pages because you have two people that were charged, so there has to be a lot of evidence there," Comer said.

    A white man with gray hair speaks to reporters in a hallway.
    House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., speaks to reporters in the Rayburn House Office Building on July 24. Comer says his committee will begin receiving records related to the Justice Department's Jeffrey Epstein investigation starting on Friday.
    (
    Kevin Dietsch
    /
    Getty Images
    )

    Comer said the Justice Department would conduct its own review of what should be redacted in the files. He expected the committee to also do a separate review.

    Critics — including some Republicans — say they're worried the release will be far from comprehensive. Democrats have argued the release to the public will be limited and carefully controlled by Republicans.

    Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., the committee's top minority member, noted the panel delivered a bipartisan vote for complete compliance with the subpoena demanding DOJ records.

    "Releasing the Epstein files in batches just continues this White House cover-up," Garcia said in a statement this week. "Handpicked, partial productions are wholly insufficient and potentially misleading."

    The unsuccessful push for grand jury testimony

    Last month, Trump asked for related grand jury transcripts to be made public. However, three federal judges have ruled against the plan.

    The latest ruling came on Wednesday, when U.S. District Judge Richard Berman of Manhattan said there wasn't sufficient justification to unseal the records. He also said the thousands of pages the government has in its possession would go further to inform the public than what the government asked to be unsealed. Berman said the grand jury materials requested totaled 70 pages of summary testimony from a single FBI agent, a power point exhibit and four pages of call logs.

    The Oversight committee's work is not the only effort in Congress to release Epstein records to the public. With Congress due to return after Labor Day, Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., plans to force a House vote on releasing the records.

    Critical of his party's response to the records demands, Massie teamed up with Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., for the bipartisan effort. The two plan to hold a press conference the day after the House's return with Epstein survivors.
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Three dead after car drives into 99 Ranch Market
    A screenshot of a television broadcast showing an overhead view of an accident scene. A fire engine and ladder truck are visible on the scene, along with a police cruiser and multiple firefighters dressed in yellow turnout gear.
    Three people are dead and several others are injured after a woman crashed her car into a 99 Ranch Market in Westwood.

    Topline:

    Three people are dead and there are multiple injuries after a driver crashed into a 99 Ranch Market in Westwood.

    What we know: The crash happened around 12:11 p.m., according to LAFD, which says four people were transported to local hospitals. Two of those people were in critical condition and two were in fair condition. The L.A. Fire Department said the woman driver hit a bicyclist about a block earlier before crashing into the store.

    Both the driver and bicyclist declined medical treatment and hospital transport. LAPD says it's not treating the crash as intentional. The LAFD says it removed the silver sedan from the store when it arrived at the scene to rescue people who were trapped. All three people who died were inside the bakery at the time of the crash.

    The victims: Names of the victims have not been released, but LAFD has identified them as a 42-year-old woman and two men, ages 55 and 30.

    This is a developing story.

  • Sponsored message
  • Police shot man who appeared to have a gun
    people stand around a long driveway roped off with police caution tape
    The Los Angeles Police Department set up a perimeter in the parking lot of the California Science Center following a shooting Thursday.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles police officers shot and killed a man who appeared to be armed with a rifle outside the California Science Center in Exposition Park on Thursday morning, according to LAPD Deputy Chief Marc Reina.

    What do we know right now? Reina said a motorcycle cop initially spotted the man around 9:30 a.m. carrying what appeared to be a rifle and walking west down State Drive, a small road that runs between the science center and Exposition Park Rose Garden. Multiple cops responded to the scene and faced off with the man. The subject continued down State Drive, Reina said, before police opened fire.

    Read on ... for more on what witnesses to the incident saw.

    Los Angeles police officers shot and killed a man who appeared to be armed with a rifle outside the California Science Center in Exposition Park on Thursday morning, according to LAPD Deputy Chief Marc Reina.

    Reina said police do not yet know the identity of man, who they estimate was about 35 years old.

    No police or other community members were injured in the incident, Reina said. The science center was placed briefly on lockdown but reopened. The north side of the museum remains closed, the deputy chief said.

    Reina said a motorcycle cop initially spotted the man around 9:30 a.m. carrying what appeared to be a rifle and walking west down State Drive, a small road that runs between the science center and Exposition Park Rose Garden.

    Multiple cops responded to the scene and faced off with the man. The subject continued down State Drive, Reina said, before police opened fire.

    Los Angeles Fire Department personnel arrived at the scene and pronounced the man dead, Reina said.

    The incident will be investigated by department use-of-force investigators, the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office and the LAPD’s inspector general, the deputy chief said.

    Investigators have not yet determined what prompted police to open fire, Reina said. Police do not believe the man fired his weapon.

    Here's what witnesses saw

    Stacey Hutchinson said he was sitting on a bench along State Drive drinking a cup of coffee when the incident unfolded.

    He said the man appeared in good spirits and greeted him nonchalantly as he walked up the street before taking a seat. Hutchinson said he saw the man carrying what appeared to be a long gun.

    Police initially responded with bean bag guns, Hutchinson said, but drew firearms when the man picked up the weapon.

    Police opened fire after the man pointed the apparent rifle in their direction, Hutchinson said.

    The man did not appear to be trying to enter the science center, Hutchinson said, and appeared to remain calm until police asked him to drop his weapon.

  • Ex-OC Supervisor Andrew Do formally disbarred
    A man in a chair wearing a suit jacket, tie and glasses looks forward with a microphone in front of him. A sign in front has the official seal of the County of Orange and states "Andrew Do, Vice Chairman, District 1."
    Then-Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do serving at an Orange County Board of Supervisor's meeting back in November 2023.

    Former Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do has been disbarred, stemming from his conviction last year on a federal bribery charge. The disbarment was expected. It stems from a state Supreme Court order that came down Dec. 1 and is now recorded as such on the state bar's website.

    What's the backstory?

    Do is currently serving a five-year prison sentence in Arizona after admitting to directing money to several nonprofit groups and businesses that then funneled some of that money back to himself and family members for personal gain. LAist has been investigating the alleged corruption since 2023. Do was also ordered to pay $878,230.80 in restitution for his role in the bribery scheme that saw millions in taxpayer dollars diverted from feeding needy seniors, leading authorities to label him a “Robin Hood in reverse.”

    What does the bar action mean?

    The official disbarment means Do is prohibited from practicing law in California. He was also ordered to pay $5,000 to the State Bar.

    Go deeper ...

    Here's a look at some of LAist's coverage of one of the biggest corruption scandals in Orange County history:

    LAist investigates: Andrew Do corruption scandal
    Ex-Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do is ordered to pay $878,230.80 in restitution
    'Robin Hood in reverse.' O.C. Supervisor Andrew Do resigns and will plead guilty to bribery conspiracy charge
    Former OC Supervisor Andrew Do turns himself in, begins 5-year federal prison term
    6 questions we still have after disgraced former OC Supervisor Andrew Do’s sentencing
    A quiet retreat for the judge married to disgraced OC politician Andrew Do

  • CA's first fully accredited tribal college
    Eight men and women wearing graduation caps, face masks and wrapped in colorful blankets stand next to each other on stage. Above and behind them hangs a banner that reads California Indian Nations College.
    The first graduation at California Indian Nations College, class of 2020 and 2021.

    Topline:

    California now has it's first fully accredited tribal college in almost 30 years.

    California Indian Nations College in Palm Desert recently received an eight-year accreditation from the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.

    Why it matters: The accreditation grants the college access to state and federal funding for higher education. Assemblymember James C. Ramos of San Bernardino calls the milestone historic, saying California has the highest number of Native Americans in the U.S.

    How we got here: There aren't any fully accredited tribal colleges in California. But a Palm Desert school might change that.