Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Corporation sues after board member firings
    A man wearing glasses and a light purple sweater sits in a black leather chair with his hands folded on his knees
    President Trump tried to fire three board members of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting on Monday, including Tom Rothman, the chairman and CEO of Sony Pictures Entertainment's Motion Picture Group.

    Topline:

    The Corporation for Public Broadcasting sued the Trump administration Tuesday in response to the president removing three of the corporation's board members on Monday.

    The backstory: The firings dovetail with President Donald Trump's efforts to shut down the corporation altogether. He has said that he will ask Congress to claw back the $1.1 billion it has already granted to support the nation's public broadcasters through September 2027, including NPR. Trump has targeted independent institutions that often serve as a platform for critical voices, which include non-profits, foundations, and universities.


    About the CPB: The CPB distributes more than $500 million annually to public broadcasters, primarily to local television and radio stations. PBS and its stations each receive, on average, 15% of their revenues from the corporation; NPR stations receive 10% of their funds from the CPB while NPR itself receives about 1% directly from CPB. (NPR receives a bit more indirectly because local member stations pay NPR for the right to air its programs.)

    About the lawsuit: In a statement, CPB says, "The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is not a government entity, and its board members are not government officers. Because CPB is not a federal agency subject to the President's authority, but rather a private corporation, we have filed a lawsuit to block these firings." In its lawsuit, CPB's legal team cites the statute authorizing CPB, which specifically states that no officers or employees of the U.S. government can serve on the board – and no board member can be considered a federal employee.

    President Donald Trump opened up a new front in his assault on public media on Monday, asserting that he was removing three of the five board members of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. The corporation sued Trump on Tuesday morning in response, pointing to federal law and a U.S. Supreme Court ruling to argue that he does not have the power to take these actions.

    U.S. District Court Judge Randolph D. Moss set a court hearing for Tuesday afternoon to take up the CPB's motion for a temporary restraining order preventing Trump's decree from taking effect.

    "As numerous courts have repeatedly affirmed, the Constitution gives President Trump the power to remove personnel who exercise his executive authority," White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in a comment emailed to NPR. "The Trump Administration looks forward to ultimate victory on the issue."

    The CPB distributes more than $500 million annually to public broadcasters, primarily to local television and radio stations. PBS and its stations each receive, on average, 15% of their revenues from the corporation; NPR stations receive 10% of their funds from the CPB while NPR itself receives about 1% directly from CPB. (NPR receives a bit more indirectly because local member stations pay NPR for the right to air its programs.)

    Under the law that created CPB more than five decades ago, the president has the authority to appoint members of its board, in consultation with Senate leaders of both parties.

    The law does not, however, establish any authority for a president to remove them. As the CPB lawsuit notes, that law does not include the clause common to U.S. government agencies that its board members "serve at the pleasure of the President."

    Indeed, the law specifically states that the CPB "will not be an agency or establishment of the United States Government" and sets up a series of measures intended to "afford the maximum protection from extraneous interference and control."

    The board members targeted by Trump are Tom Rothman and Diane Kaplan – both appointees of former President Joe Biden – and Laura Gore Ross, who was appointed to the board by Trump in his first term and then reappointed by Biden.

    "Not a federal agency"

    In recent weeks, the Trump administration similarly took control of the boards of the John F. Kennedy Center for Performing Arts and the U.S. Institute of Peace. Trump appointed himself chairman of the former and shut down the latter. The two organizations are hybrids — duck-billed platypuses of Washington fauna: The Kennedy Center is a public-private partnership; the peace institute an independent nonprofit corporation with the secretaries of defense and state as board members by virtue of their offices.

    In a statement, CPB says, "The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is not a government entity, and its board members are not government officers. Because CPB is not a federal agency subject to the President's authority, but rather a private corporation, we have filed a lawsuit to block these firings."

    In its lawsuit, CPB's legal team cites the statute authorizing CPB, which specifically states that no officers or employees of the U.S. government can serve on the board – and no board member can be considered a federal employee.

    Trump's sweeping actions to remake the federal government and workforce have inspired a raft of litigation. Along with many wins, the White House has been handed numerous defeats in court, among them cases filed by law firms objecting to executive orders and staffers of the Voice of America and Radio Free Asia seeking to reinstate funding for their networks.

    A chilling effect

    Georgetown law professor Stephen Vladeck says the CPB's lawsuit "has legs."

    But he adds a warning to those who oppose Trump's actions:

    "The Trump administration is not trying to win all these lawsuits," Vladeck says. "A lot of its behavior is patently unlawful. And a lot of its behavior will not survive litigation. But it's nevertheless designed to intimidate, to chill, to shift the conversation, to consume the oxygen."

    Trump's assault on public broadcasting is part of his broader war on the media, which encompasses his own private lawsuits, regulatory pressures, restrictions on journalists' access, mass cancellation of news subscriptions used by federal agencies, scaling back protections against prosecutors' investigations of reporters and more.

    In an interview with the Atlantic published this week, Trump praised Amazon founder and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos, who killed a drafted presidential endorsement of then-Vice President Kamala Harris last fall and reshaped his opinion pages away from its criticisms of Trump.

    "He's 100 percent. He's been great," Trump said of Bezos.

    More broadly, Trump has targeted independent institutions that often serve as a platform for critical voices, which include non-profits, foundations, and universities.

    Public media, because of the taxpayer subsidy, hits a rhetorical sweet spot for the president.

    In a recent U.S. House subcommittee hearing, the president's conservative allies sought to portray public media as a plaything for liberals and Democrats. Yet the CPB chief executive now suing Trump, Patricia de Stacy Harrison, is a former co-chairperson of the Republican National Committee and State Department official under President George W. Bush.

    A two-line email

    News of the president's intent arrived Monday evening in an email to the three board members from Trent Morse, the deputy White House director of presidential personnel for the executive office of the president.

    It read, in full: "On behalf of President Donald J. Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position on the Corporation for Public Broadcasting is terminated effective immediately. Thank you for your service."

    As the CPB noted in its legal filing, the message did not state the authority Trump was invoking to fire them.

    A vow to take back funding

    The White House's email to the CPB board members dovetails with Trump's efforts to shut down the corporation altogether. He has said that he will ask Congress to claw back the $1.1 billion it has already granted to support the nation's public broadcasters through September 2027.

    Once they receive a formal request, the U.S. House and Senate would each have to affirm the withdrawal of those funds — called a "rescission" — by a simple majority within 45 days for it to take effect. While Republicans who control each chamber have publicly signaled support, it is not clear whether they have enough support within their own ranks to do so. Congressional leaders say they have not yet received the request.

    Congress's decision to authorize money for CPB for two years at a time was a further effort to insulate the corporation, and public media more generally, from political pressures; a 1975 House Committee report said the advance funding would "go a long way toward eliminating both the risk of and the appearance of undue interference with and control of public broadcasting."

    Other government pressures on public media

    Trump has used other levers of government to exert pressure on public media. On social media, he has repeatedly pounded NPR and PBS to contend they should receive no taxpayer funds.

    His chief broadcasting regulator, Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr, has opened up a formal investigation into NPR and PBS stations and the networks' practices for running underwriting spots for corporate sponsors. He says they are indistinguishable from commercials; NPR and PBS and public media stations say they closely adhere to the guidance they have received from commission staffers over the course of decades as they have been encouraged to broaden their revenue streams beyond public coffers.

    The investigation carries implications, however, as Carr's agency oversees who is granted licenses to broadcast on the airwaves — and who can beam their signals using the desired noncommercial range of terrestrial broadcasting frequencies.

    The chapter on media in The Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 blueprint for a second Trump term — disavowed by the president on the campaign trail and closely followed by his aides once back in office — calls for NPR, PBS and public media stations to be "shorn" of their noncommercial status.

    Disclosure: This story was reported and written by NPR Media Correspondent David Folkenflik and edited by Deputy Business Editor Emily Kopp and Managing Editor Vickie Walton-James. Under NPR's protocol for reporting on itself, no corporate official or news executive reviewed this story before it was posted publicly.

    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Three dead after car drives into 99 Ranch Market
    A screenshot of a television broadcast showing an overhead view of an accident scene. A fire engine and ladder truck are visible on the scene, along with a police cruiser and multiple firefighters dressed in yellow turnout gear.
    Three people are dead and several others are injured after a woman crashed her car into a 99 Ranch Market in Westwood.

    Topline:

    Three people are dead and there are multiple injuries after a driver crashed into a 99 Ranch Market in Westwood.

    What we know: The crash happened around 12:11 p.m., according to LAFD, which says four people were transported to local hospitals. Two of those people were in critical condition and two were in fair condition. The L.A. Fire Department said the woman driver hit a bicyclist about a block earlier before crashing into the store.

    Both the driver and bicyclist declined medical treatment and hospital transport. LAPD says it's not treating the crash as intentional. The LAFD says it removed the silver sedan from the store when it arrived at the scene to rescue people who were trapped. All three people who died were inside the bakery at the time of the crash.

    The victims: Names of the victims have not been released, but LAFD has identified them as a 42-year-old woman and two men, ages 55 and 30.

    This is a developing story.

  • Sponsored message
  • Police shot man who appeared to have a gun
    people stand around a long driveway roped off with police caution tape
    The Los Angeles Police Department set up a perimeter in the parking lot of the California Science Center following a shooting Thursday.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles police officers shot and killed a man who appeared to be armed with a rifle outside the California Science Center in Exposition Park on Thursday morning, according to LAPD Deputy Chief Marc Reina.

    What do we know right now? Reina said a motorcycle cop initially spotted the man around 9:30 a.m. carrying what appeared to be a rifle and walking west down State Drive, a small road that runs between the science center and Exposition Park Rose Garden. Multiple cops responded to the scene and faced off with the man. The subject continued down State Drive, Reina said, before police opened fire.

    Read on ... for more on what witnesses to the incident saw.

    Los Angeles police officers shot and killed a man who appeared to be armed with a rifle outside the California Science Center in Exposition Park on Thursday morning, according to LAPD Deputy Chief Marc Reina.

    Reina said police do not yet know the identity of man, who they estimate was about 35 years old.

    No police or other community members were injured in the incident, Reina said. The science center was placed briefly on lockdown but reopened. The north side of the museum remains closed, the deputy chief said.

    Reina said a motorcycle cop initially spotted the man around 9:30 a.m. carrying what appeared to be a rifle and walking west down State Drive, a small road that runs between the science center and Exposition Park Rose Garden.

    Multiple cops responded to the scene and faced off with the man. The subject continued down State Drive, Reina said, before police opened fire.

    Los Angeles Fire Department personnel arrived at the scene and pronounced the man dead, Reina said.

    The incident will be investigated by department use-of-force investigators, the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office and the LAPD’s inspector general, the deputy chief said.

    Investigators have not yet determined what prompted police to open fire, Reina said. Police do not believe the man fired his weapon.

    Here's what witnesses saw

    Stacey Hutchinson said he was sitting on a bench along State Drive drinking a cup of coffee when the incident unfolded.

    He said the man appeared in good spirits and greeted him nonchalantly as he walked up the street before taking a seat. Hutchinson said he saw the man carrying what appeared to be a long gun.

    Police initially responded with bean bag guns, Hutchinson said, but drew firearms when the man picked up the weapon.

    Police opened fire after the man pointed the apparent rifle in their direction, Hutchinson said.

    The man did not appear to be trying to enter the science center, Hutchinson said, and appeared to remain calm until police asked him to drop his weapon.

  • Ex-OC Supervisor Andrew Do formally disbarred
    A man in a chair wearing a suit jacket, tie and glasses looks forward with a microphone in front of him. A sign in front has the official seal of the County of Orange and states "Andrew Do, Vice Chairman, District 1."
    Then-Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do serving at an Orange County Board of Supervisor's meeting back in November 2023.

    Former Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do has been disbarred, stemming from his conviction last year on a federal bribery charge. The disbarment was expected. It stems from a state Supreme Court order that came down Dec. 1 and is now recorded as such on the state bar's website.

    What's the backstory?

    Do is currently serving a five-year prison sentence in Arizona after admitting to directing money to several nonprofit groups and businesses that then funneled some of that money back to himself and family members for personal gain. LAist has been investigating the alleged corruption since 2023. Do was also ordered to pay $878,230.80 in restitution for his role in the bribery scheme that saw millions in taxpayer dollars diverted from feeding needy seniors, leading authorities to label him a “Robin Hood in reverse.”

    What does the bar action mean?

    The official disbarment means Do is prohibited from practicing law in California. He was also ordered to pay $5,000 to the State Bar.

    Go deeper ...

    Here's a look at some of LAist's coverage of one of the biggest corruption scandals in Orange County history:

    LAist investigates: Andrew Do corruption scandal
    Ex-Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do is ordered to pay $878,230.80 in restitution
    'Robin Hood in reverse.' O.C. Supervisor Andrew Do resigns and will plead guilty to bribery conspiracy charge
    Former OC Supervisor Andrew Do turns himself in, begins 5-year federal prison term
    6 questions we still have after disgraced former OC Supervisor Andrew Do’s sentencing
    A quiet retreat for the judge married to disgraced OC politician Andrew Do

  • CA's first fully accredited tribal college
    Eight men and women wearing graduation caps, face masks and wrapped in colorful blankets stand next to each other on stage. Above and behind them hangs a banner that reads California Indian Nations College.
    The first graduation at California Indian Nations College, class of 2020 and 2021.

    Topline:

    California now has it's first fully accredited tribal college in almost 30 years.

    California Indian Nations College in Palm Desert recently received an eight-year accreditation from the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.

    Why it matters: The accreditation grants the college access to state and federal funding for higher education. Assemblymember James C. Ramos of San Bernardino calls the milestone historic, saying California has the highest number of Native Americans in the U.S.

    How we got here: There aren't any fully accredited tribal colleges in California. But a Palm Desert school might change that.