Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Electric trucks are vulnerable to federal threats
    Nine big trucks of various colors line up at gates in a parking lot
    In an aerial view, trucks line up to leave a shipping terminal at a port of entry.

    Topline:

    President Donald Trump’s cuts to federal funding and attacks on state climate policy that have already caused California to withdraw one of its most ambitious pollution rules are raising questions about whether the state can propel its transition to zero-emission trucks forward on its own.

    Why it matters: Trucks are an outsize source of pollution for California and one of the thorniest pieces of the state’s grand experiment to show the world what a net-zero economy looks like. In contrast with passenger vehicles, where a robust market for electric cars already exists, California’s market for electric trucks is just in its infancy and more vulnerable to federal threats.

    What Trump is taking away: A week before Trump took office, California withdrew its request for a federal waiver to implement its clean truck purchasing mandate, citing Trump’s opposition and the fact that former-President Joe Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency ran out of time to act on the rule. Trump is also seeking to block government spending, with a special target on Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funds, throwing billions of federal dollars for truck charging into question.

    Regulators look on the bright side: Officials say the state still has regulatory and financial tools to meet its goal of 100 percent zero-emission port trucks by 2035 and 100 percent clean trucks across the state by 2045. Funds are available through local air districts, state agencies, California’s cap-and-trade program and its transportation fuels emissions trading program.

    Others aren’t sure: Some private fleet owners say the loss of California’s zero-emission truck purchasing mandate will delay the transition. Under that rule, companies were supposed to stop registering new diesel trucks with the ports beginning in 2024.

    For more, read the full story in POLITICO's California Climate newsletter.

    This story is published in partnership with POLITICO. 

  • "Imperfect Paradise" ultrarunner episode honored
    At left a medallion for Edward R. Murrow winners, at right a group of people gesture in celebration at the Start/Finish line of a race.
    The story of Cesar Quijano, center, with his Amity support team at the finish line of the San Diego 100, has been honored with a National Murrow Award.

    Topline:

    LAist’s weekly podcast Imperfect Paradise won a national Edward R. Murrow Award — among the highest honors in journalism — which was announced today.

    About the episode: The episode "Rebuilding a life, 100 miles at a time" won in the Podcast category and tells the story of Cesar Quijano, who was struggling with addiction and reentry following years in prison.

    Keep reading... to listen to his story.

    LAist’s weekly podcast Imperfect Paradise has won a 2026 national Edward R. Murrow Award — among the highest honors in journalism.

    The episode "Rebuilding a life, 100 miles at a time" won in the Podcast category and tells the story of Cesar Quijano, who was struggling with addiction and reentry following years in prison.

    Quijano found purpose and salvation in an unlikely hobby: ultrarunning. The episode follows Quijano as he prepares and completes a 100-mile race and unpacks consequential questions about the support people need to successfully transition out of prison and into society.

    The episode was co-reported by Lucy Copp and Senior Producer Natalie Chudnovsky and hosted by Antonia Cereijido, with production help from James Chow and engineering by Shawn Campbell.

    The award was announced Thursday.

    "We're honored for this recognition," said LAist Editor in Chief Megan Garvey. "This is a moving, well-told story of resilience and rebirth. It's a great example of the deep and human-centered enterprise journalism that is a hallmark of LAist and our flagship podcast, Imperfect Paradise."

    The winning episode advanced to national consideration after taking top regional honors earlier this year. Another Imperfect Paradise episode, "Rebuild or leave? One Black family in Altadena decides their future after Eaton Fire" also won a regional Murrow award.

  • Sponsored message
  • Concerns of worse times as Long Beach debates cuts
    Two firefighters, slight out of focus in the foreground, speak to one another as a group of firefighters extinguish a fire in a home.
    Long Beach firefighters extinguish a fire inside a home on the 400 block of 59th Street in Long Beach, Monday, July 20, 2026.

    Topline:

    Residents and City Council members are raising concerns about Long Beach’s plan to shut down a fire engine, lay off dozens of firefighters and reduce fire station staffing on a rotating basis.

    More details: They said city management should consider other options to balance the budget before making cuts that would drive up response time and limit how effectively first responders can handle emergencies.

    Why now: Objections came during a City Council meeting Tuesday night when officials discussed potential cuts at the Long Beach Fire Department, which are part of sweeping cost-saving measures City Manager Tom Modica proposed to close a $58 million deficit in the coming fiscal year.

    Read on... for more on what's next for these potential cuts.

    Residents and City Council members are raising concerns about Long Beach’s plan to shut down a fire engine, lay off dozens of firefighters and reduce fire station staffing on a rotating basis.

    They said city management should consider other options to balance the budget before making cuts that would drive up response time and limit how effectively first responders can handle emergencies.

    Objections came during a City Council meeting Tuesday night when officials discussed potential cuts at the Long Beach Fire Department, which are part of sweeping cost-saving measures City Manager Tom Modica proposed to close a $58 million deficit in the coming fiscal year.

    Modica’s plan called for trimming $11 million from the LBFD’s $201 million budget. It would mean shutting down Fire Engine 14 in East Long Beach, eliminating 34 positions overall — including 28 currently filled jobs — and taking one engine out of service on a rotating basis among the city’s 23 stations.

    Four fire captain positions would be cut, including roles tied to the Los Angeles Joint Regional Intelligence Center, community services and public information, and training and recruitment, along with a vacant battalion chief position in the Operations Bureau. The Fire Department’s headquarters front desk would also lose its in-person staffing and shift to a remote receptionist system.

    In arguing to shut down Engine 14, which operates out of the fire station near Colorado Lagoon, officials said it responds to about 2,200 — mostly medical — emergencies each year but only about 200 fire calls, which is fewer than other engines. Fire Station 14’s ambulance crew will continue without interruption, they added. Eliminating the engine, along with laying off the firefighters assigned to it, is expected to save the city $3.88 million.

    A firetruck pulls out of a station into a street.
    Long Beach Fire Engine 14 pulls into Station 14 at the intersection of Colorado Street and Elliot Street in Long Beach Tuesday, November 29, 2022.
    (
    Thomas R. Cordova
    /
    Long Beach Post
    )

    Taking an additional engine out of service on a rotating basis would save an additional $3.82 million.

    But after pushback from the public and City Council members, Modica said his office would bring back other options to consider within the next week.

    The City Council must ultimately vote on any cuts before they take effect.

    What would the cuts mean?

    Cuts of the magnitude proposed would invariably affect operations, Fire Chief Dennis Buchanan told City Council members. “When I say operations, I mean I have to impact the community,” he said.

    The cuts would lead to an increased strain on firefighters and paramedics, leading to longer response times and instances where there is no engine available to respond to an emergency.

    “Even a mild adjustment can affect the way we respond to calls,” he said.

    Lamont Nguyen, president of the city firefighters union, said that the loss of Engine 14 would reverberate through the city. He said the engine, unlike some others, is also a paramedic-assessment unit, meaning it’s equipped to respond to medical calls and administer IVs and life-saving medication, or use heart monitors that could save someone in the time leading up to the arrival of an ambulance.

    Firefighters and paramedics responded to more than 67,200 calls for service in the past fiscal year, department data show, with 85% for medical emergencies and 11% for fires.

    The pushback

    Councilmember Kristina Duggan, whose district includes Station 14’s coverage area, said the calls for service won’t stop just because the engine does.

    She noted her district has more than 1,200 new housing units coming online in the next two years, along with an expanded battery storage facility next to a natural gas power plant.

    “It still does respond to 2,200-plus calls per year,” Duggan said of Engine 14. “If Engine 14 is eliminated, that doesn’t mean the calls disappear.”

    Calls currently handled by Engine 14 would be redirected to Engine 4 in Belmont Heights, Engine 8 in Belmont Shore and Engine 22, which serves the area near Cal State Long Beach.

    Councilmember Daryl Supernaw said that redistribution could overextend Engine 22, whose coverage area already stretches north to Cal State Long Beach, sometimes along the 405 Freeway and south to the border of Seal Beach.

    “To say it’s going to be impactful is an understatement,” Supernaw said.

    Supernaw also noted that Engine 22 sits near the 405 Freeway and sometimes must respond to time-consuming freeway incidents and must go into the coverage area of Fire Station 18, which does not have its own engine.

    During the City Council meeting Tuesday, resident Patrick Pianezza urged the council to reconsider the cuts, arguing that removing Engine 14 would leave a gap that ambulances alone can’t fill, since they typically don’t carry fire-suppression equipment.

    “When you remove resources for public safety and public health, nothing good happens,” Pianezza said.

    What’s next?

    Mayor Rex Richardson has already proposed revising a portion of the cuts, specifically the rotating engine closure.

    However, he said Long Beach has survived prior budget crises that also required public safety cuts.

    “We know that budgets are cyclical. Sometimes there’s good years, sometimes there’s bad years,” Richardson said. “The last three mayors had to deal with it, the last three councils had to deal with it.”

    Long Beach Mayor Rex Richardson, a man with medium skin tone, wearing a black suit and blue tie, speaks behind a podium as he gestures with one hand.
    Long Beach Mayor Rex Richardson outlines his budget proposals during a press conference at City Hall on Thursday, July 30, 2026.
    (
    Thomas R. Cordova
    /
    Long Beach Post
    )

    He and others pointed out that Long Beach has closed and later restored fire engines before.

    Engine 12 was shut down and took roughly a decade to be structurally re-funded, according to city officials, while Engine 17 was restored in 2019 after seven years without full funding.

    Both engines, along with Engine 8, have since been brought back into service. Some council members and residents argued that history shows how difficult it can be to bring back a unit once it’s gone, even as the surrounding neighborhoods continue to grow.

    Richardson expressed optimism that the current shortfall is temporary and that the city is on track to reach a structural surplus within two years.

    “But the good news is, once it is structurally addressed through this plan, you know, forecast long-term fiscal stability that we haven’t had since the pre-pandemic era,” Richardson said. “That’s what we’re doing in this budget.”

    You can give your opinion on the budget by submitting a comment card here until Friday. The City Council and its Budget Oversight Committee will also continue discussing the budget at upcoming meetings, which you can find here. City Council members must adopt a balanced budget by October.

  • New bills seek to protect neighborhoods
    Assemblymember Mark González, a man with medium skin tone, wearing a blue suit, speaks behind a wooden podium outside, as state Sen. María Elena Durazo, a woman with medium skin tone, wearing a brown top and skirt, and LA Mayor Karen Bass, a woman with medium skin tone, wearing a gray suit, and others listen to González.
    At a press conference at Proyecto Pastoral on Wednesday, Aug. 12, Assemblymember Mark González and state Sen. María Elena Durazo announced two pieces of legislation that aim to keep the Lineage accountable in the aftermath of the fire.

    Topline:

    Two pieces of legislation were announced at a press conference on Wednesday at Proyecto Pastoral in Boyle Heights that aim to keep the Lineage cold-storage facility accountable in the aftermath of the fire.

    Building permits: One bill — proposed by Assemblymember Mark González — seeks to prevent the city and county of Los Angeles from issuing new building permits to cold storage facilities like Lineage, “unless they maintain a contingency fund that can be accessed in states of emergency.”

    Fines: The other bill, proposed by state Sen. María Elena Durazo, would increase the amount that cities and counties can fine companies that violate their ordinances.

    Read on... for more on the proposed legislation.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    Two pieces of legislation were announced at a press conference on Wednesday at Proyecto Pastoral in Boyle Heights that aim to keep the Lineage cold-storage facility accountable in the aftermath of the fire. 

    About the Lineage fire

    The Lineage fire broke out at a 500,000 square foot cold storage warehouse in Boyle Heights on June 17 and burned for a week.

    In the aftermath of the fire, tens of millions of pounds of refrigerated food stored in the massive warehouse rotted, sending foul odors and pests into the surrounding neighborhood.

    Check the current status of cleanup at the facility >

    Here's what you should know about the proposals:

    AB 817: Tax-free settlements

    One bill — proposed by Assemblymember Mark González — seeks to prevent the city and county of Los Angeles from issuing new building permits to cold storage facilities like Lineage, “unless they maintain a contingency fund that can be accessed in states of emergency.”

    The legislation, known as AB 817, also aims to ensure that any future settlements be tax-free for residents impacted by the Lineage fire. It would require local governments to take quicker action on controlling vectors if a state of emergency is declared.

    “If you’re going to operate in a community, you have a responsibility to that community, and if something goes wrong, the community should not have to beg for the resources just to survive it,” González said. 

    “AB817 will not undo what has already happened, but it can make sure that the next community in California is not left asking the same questions we are asking today,” González added.

    SB 716: Fines for violators

    The other bill, proposed by state Sen. María Elena Durazo, would increase the amount that cities and counties can fine companies that violate their ordinances. 

    Under this proposed legislation — known as SB 716 — violators would face $1,000 per day for a first violation, $2,000 for a second violation, and $5,000 for each additional violation. If the violation results from a state or federal disaster declaration, these fines can be multiplied up to $50,000 per violation, according to the legislative factsheet.

    Durazo said the current cap of $2,000 per day on city and county fines is not a “deterrent” for a company the size of Lineage, which has been cited by county health officials for unsanitary and nuisance conditions. Durazo said L.A. County issued six citations to Lineage and imposed $500 fines per day from July 23 through July 29.

    “It is outrageous that my constituents, the residents of these communities, are expected to endure these conditions while clean-up continues at the company’s slow pace,” Durazo said. “We need more tools to address this emergency now … and to prevent this from ever happening again.” 

    Why now

    These proposed bills come weeks after permit applications were filed to restore the Lineage cold-storage warehouse.

    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass, who attended Wednesday’s press conference, has directed city departments to pause any approval of permits to rebuild the Lineage warehouse pending an investigation.

    Just last week, the South Coast Air Quality Management District hearing board ordered Lineage to strengthen odor-control measures, expand air monitoring and improve communication with residents as cleanup of the burned warehouse continues.

    The board, however, did not require Lineage to pay any financial penalties, which several elected officials, including Bass, had requested in light of the numerous air quality violations it had been issued.

  • Judge pauses Trump administration's suspension
    A cyclist rides past a Skid Row sign in Los Angeles.

    Topline:

    A federal judge on Thursday granted a preliminary injunction on the federal government’s suspension of granting funds to the L.A. region’s lead homelessness agency.

    Why it matters: The order from U.S. District Judge David O. Carter means the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority can apply for federal homelessness funds used to provide services and housing to 11,000 people in the area. Carter ordered the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to distribute about $241 million anticipated to the L.A. region in this year’s homelessness funding competition. HUD was also ordered to pay out grants already awarded last year within 45 days, which LAHSA told LAist amounts to about $66.5 million.

    What the judge says: The judge acknowledged that LAHSA “may be dysfunctional,” but said thousands of people experiencing homelessness rely on those services. He said HUD “abruptly” pulled the rug from under providers and the unhoused people they serve.

    “Inevitably, this suspension will result in deaths among the homeless and the displacement of over 11,000 unhoused individuals onto the streets and into the neighborhoods of Los Angeles,” Carter wrote in his order. “It is much easier to destroy a dysfunctional homelessness system than to take the time and care necessary to make the system function properly,” he continued.

    How we got here: HUD suspended LAHSA from federal grant activity in June, citing alleged mismanagement by the agency. LAHSA filed a lawsuit to overturn or pause the suspension, which is what led to last week’s hearing in downtown L.A. where officials with the agency and Trump administration faced off in court.

    LA officials weigh in: L.A. County Supervisor Kathryn Barger said the ruling is fair, measured and strikes an appropriate balance by preserving short-term stability while creating a clear path toward accountability.

    "The Court's approach aligns with our County's longstanding position that reform should be deliberate and responsible," Barger said in a statement. "Change is necessary, but it must be implemented in a way that does not pull the rug out from under vulnerable individuals who depend on these services today."

    What's next: All parties have been ordered to appear in court on Oct. 27 for a status conference, which is when the preliminary injunction expires. A trial is scheduled to start next February.

    Go deeper: Court weighs options as LA and Trump administration face off over homelessness funding