Erin Stone
covers climate and environmental issues in Southern California.
Published October 23, 2024 10:00 AM
An active oil refinery is located next to a single-family home on September 21, 2022 in Wilmington.
(
Allison Dinner
/
Getty Images
)
Topline:
Phillips 66 announced last week it will shut down its oil refineries in Wilmington and Carson by the end of year. There are complicated implications for neighboring communities, California's gasoline supply and gas prices.
Why it matters: Together, the Phillips 66 refineries supply about 8% of all of California’s gasoline demand. They also contribute to California’s planet-heating pollution and higher rates of asthma and cancer in neighboring communities.
Keep reading... for more on how the closure may impact gas prices and what may be next for the 650-acre site.
Phillips 66 announced last week it will shut down its oil refineries in Wilmington and Carson by the end of next year, marking the end of an era.
The decision comes as demand for gasoline continues to decline and an aging facility faces costly maintenance and updates to meet pollution regulations.
About 600 employees and 300 contractors will be affected by the closure, according to the company.
What does the closure mean for nearby communities?
Pollution from refineries has been linked to higher rates of asthma and cancer in neighboring communities. Homes in Wilmington, for example, are a stone’s throw from the Phillips 66 facility, just across a cinder block wall. The Wilmington and Carson area has the largest concentration of oil refineries in California.
These facilities are linked to so much suffering and death that they will never pay for.
— Alicia Rivera, Wilmington organizer for Communities for a Better Environment
“These facilities are linked to so much suffering and death that they will never pay for,” said Alicia Rivera, an organizer with Communities for a Better Environment who has advocated for better protections from refinery pollution in Wilmington for more than 20 years.
She said she’s glad the refinery is closing, but worries the site will just be turned into another health-harming facility, such as hydrogen, biofuel production, or carbon capture. Those types of operations may reduce planet-heating carbon pollution compared to traditional oil and gas production, but they can also increase or not significantly reduce local health-harming air pollution, as well as have other impacts.
“I hope that Phillips 66 doesn’t plan another polluting operation…continuing the trend of fossil fuels that are fueling the catastrophe of illnesses in the neighborhood and in the climate,” Rivera said. “The neighbors are vigilant about what the plans are.”
An aerial view shows Marathon Petroleum Corp's Los Angeles Refinery in Carson, Calif. It's the state's largest producer of gasoline. It's among the many refineries in Wilmington-Carson area, including Phillips 66's Los Angeles Refinery, which will shut down next year.
Rivera said the community has not yet been involved in discussions about what may be next for the site.
Redevelopment would be subject to a full public process under the California Environmental Quality Act.
What’s next for the refineries?
“With the long-term sustainability of our Los Angeles Refinery uncertain and affected by market dynamics, we are working with leading land development firms to evaluate the future use of our unique and strategically located properties near the Port of Los Angeles,” said Mark Lashier, chairman and CEO of Phillips 66, in a news release. “These sites offer an opportunity to create a transformational project that can support the environment, generate economic development, create jobs, and improve the region’s critical infrastructure."
A Phillips 66 spokesperson declined to provide more details on their future plans for the 650-acre site.
Phillips 66 has been trying to sell the aging refineries for years, said David Hackett, chairman of Stillwater Associates, a transportation energy consulting firm in Irvine.
Phillips 66 is not one of their clients, but Hackett said they called him about the closure before the public announcement.
(
Courtesy Nick Souza Photography via The Port of Los Angeles
)
Hackett told LAist their representative told him that part of the 650-acre site will be converted to an oil terminal, which will store and distribute imported petroleum products.
The rest of the site he expects they’ll clean up and repurpose for other industrial uses, such as warehousing. The land is zoned industrial.
“Land that's zoned industrial is very dear in Southern California,” Hackett said. “So they could essentially recycle the land, scrape the buildings that are there, clean up the dirt, and then sell it to somebody for other industrial uses. There are plenty of examples of this in the industry. You see this fairly frequently.”
Why now?
Demand for gasoline has been steadily declining since the early 2000s due to slowed population growth, more efficient gas and diesel vehicles, and now the increasing adoption of electric vehicles. The Phillips 66 L.A. refineries also face higher costs to maintain and upgrade aging facilities and meet pollution reduction requirements.
Hackett said he wasn’t surprised Phillips 66 decided to shut down the aging refinery, but he was surprised by the timing.
“What we forecast is that the demand is going to come off to the point sometime before the end of the decade where the economics of running a refinery are poor,” Hackett said. “At that point, somebody would give up and quit. We didn't think somebody would be quitting next year. We figured it would be around 2027.”
We didn't think somebody would be quitting next year. We figured it would be around 2027.
— David Hackett, Stillwater Associates
A spokesperson for Phillips 66 said in a statement that the decision was primarily related to high-cost operations and a long-term decline in demand for crude oil products.
Will gas prices be affected?
Phillips 66 said in its news release that despite the closure at the end of next year, it will continue to “work with the state of California to supply fuel markets and meet ongoing consumer demand.”
The company declined to provide more details to LAist on how exactly they'll meet that demand.
Hackett said the closure could lead to higher gas prices, because the company will likely need to import more gasoline to meet demand.
“While demand is decreasing, it's not going to decrease 8% between now and the end of next year,” Hackett said. “That gasoline supply…is going to come in by tanker from someplace else.”
And imported gasoline on average costs more, Hackett said.
"Instead of being produced locally, it'll be produced someplace else: India or Korea or the United Kingdom — those are the places that make the most California-like gasoline, so it's got to come from halfway around the world," Hackett said. “It's going to be expensive.”
The refineries will shut down late next year, so the exact impact won’t be quite clear until closer to the date.
Climate Emergency Questions
Fires. Mudslides. Heat waves. What questions do you need answered as you prepare for the effects of the climate emergency?
Yusra Farzan
reports on issues affecting current and future college students, their families and communities.
Published August 19, 2026 3:25 PM
Students at UCLA on the Janss steps.
(
Ashley Balderrama
/
LAist
)
Topline:
UCLA has announced plans to stutter two university-run childcare centers next June because the university has determined “the program is not sustainable.”
Why it matters: UCLA's Early Care and Education program has long provided a safe and reliable childcare option, according to students and faculty. Clemente Larraín, a doctoral student from Chile, chose UCLA because it offered subsidized childcare on campus.
Those businesses have typically cared for children 5 and under but are now losing more kids to transitional kindergarten. Between 2019 and 2025, about 1,100 preschools have closed across California.
Clemente Larraín, a doctoral student from Chile, chose his program at UCLA because it offered subsidized childcare on campus. His young daughter was enrolled for free, giving him the peace of mind to focus on his studies.
Now, the university has thrown a wrench in those plans.
In an email to families enrolled in UCLA’s Early Care and Education program, Darnell Hunt, executive vice chancellor and provost, announced two university-run childcare centers will close at the end of the 2026-27 academic year because the university has determined “the program is not sustainable.”
“ For international students, this is the worst news because we don't have networks here," Larraín said. "We don't have family. Some of us have some friends, but not too close to just trusting them to our kids.”
He earns around $3,000 a month working on campus, which he said barely covers his rent, forcing the family to dig into savings. Meanwhile, his wife is waiting for a work permit so she can start to bring in additional income.
Having to find full time care for their daughter is causing immense stress.
“ This obviously changed radically the experience of the graduate students with family at UCLA,” Larraín said.
Evyn Lê Espiritu Gandhi, an associate professor of Asian American studies at UCLA, has two children enrolled in a UCLA-run childcare center, which she said costs her around $6,000 a month — and that’s at a subsidized rate.
“Having a high-quality, safe, reliable childcare option for my children just allows me to do my job as a UCLA professor, which includes research and publishing, but also teaching and mentorship of undergraduate and graduate students,” Gandhi said. “I'm really not sure how I'll be able to do that job if I don't have adequate childcare next year.”
Gandhi said the only alternative she has for her daughter is Bright Horizons Westwood, which is part of a large chain of childcare facilities across the U.S.
“ But to be honest it doesn't have as good of a kind of teacher-child ratio as [UCLA's Early Care and Education] does, and it has a super long wait list,” she said.
LAist has reached out to the childcare facility to ask about its waitlist, teacher-child ratio and rates.
Earlier this year, Gandhi said, tuition at UCLA’s Early Care and Education program increased by 4%, Gandhi said. At the time, UCLA also announced it would eliminate “all food program services (which includes all meals, baby formula and food, milk and snacks), discontinuing support for diapers and formula, not backfilling vacant positions, and other cost reducing measures.”
After families protested, the university backed down.
‘Disconnected from its mission’
Yvonne Yang, an assistant clinical professor at UCLA in psychiatry, called it "callous and heartless," even "cruel" that the university decided to close down the childcare centers.
“It means to me that the university has completely become disconnected from its mission and basically lost its soul and is focusing only on profits,” said Yang, who is also a physician and researcher at the West Los Angeles VA Medical Center.
Yang said she’s now competing with all the families enrolled in the UCLA program for the limited childcare options available on the west side.
”When our kids were young and still breastfeeding, moms are welcome to just walk up to the daycare and to feed our kids during the workday, which is so much better than having to pump,” she said. “It's just a way of maintaining that connection with your kids so early in that transition.”
Having the childcare center on campus allowed her to integrate having a family life and being a professor, she said.
Makenna Cramer
covers the daily drumbeat of Southern California — events, processes and nuances making it a unique place to call home.
Published August 19, 2026 3:07 PM
A firefighter douses a hot spot as a fire burns in Pacific Palisades, California on January 7, 2025.
(
David Swanson
/
AFP
)
Topline:
The former Pacific Palisades resident accused of starting a fire that led to last year’s destructive Palisades Fire pleaded not guilty Wednesday to a new set of reduced arson-related charges, according to federal prosecutors.
Why it matters: Jonathan Rinderknecht, 30, was arraigned on two charges in a downtown L.A. courtroom. He was originally facing three arson-related charges, but his first trial ended with a deadlocked jury in June. The judge declared a mistrial, and First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli vowed to retry the case before a new jury.
Why now: Steve Haney, Rinderknecht’s attorney, told reporters after the hearing that their defense strategy will mostly remain the same, as he argues Rinderknecht is innocent. "I've maintained all along that the charging was a little bit curious," Haney said, according to LAist’s media partner CBS LA. "[Prosecutors] still need to establish that there's some bridge between the two fires, the Lachman Fire on Jan. 1 and Palisades on Jan. 7, and I think that's a real challenge."
The backstory: Prosecutors have argued that Rinderknecht maliciously started the smaller Lachman Fire near a hiking trail in the Santa Monica Mountains just after midnight on New Year’s Day 2025. About a week later, it became the Palisades Fire, one of the most destructive wildfires in California history.
What's next: The retrial was originally set for October, but it’s been continued to Nov. 2. Rinderknecht will stay in federal custody in the meantime.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
Mariana Dale
explores and explains the forces that shape how and what kids learn from kindergarten to high school.
Published August 19, 2026 2:58 PM
Inglewood Unified partnered with Dr. Dre and producer Jimmy Iovine to open a new high school in 2025.
(
Robert Gauthier
/
Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
)
Topline:
Los Angeles County education leaders say Inglewood Unified is emerging from a financial crisis that started more than a decade ago. An estimated 5,000 students returned to district campuses this week for the start of what could be the last school year under the control of an outside administrator.
The backstory: Inglewood Unified entered receivership in 2012 after the district requested a multimillion loan from the state to balance its budget. As a condition of the loan, the state, and later Los Angeles County, appointed a series of outside administrators to run the district. To regain local control, Inglewood Unified must meet more than 100 standards related to finance, governance, staffing, student achievement and facilities and pay off the $29 million loan — with interest.
Why it matters: If the district maintains recent improvements to its financial and facilities management, as determined by the evaluation of a state agency, the elected board of education could regain the power to approve a budget and make other key decisions in 2027. County administrator Jim Morris told LAist he is “completely confident,” the district’s scores on the state evaluation will continue to improve.
Challenges ahead: Deficit spending was one factor that landed Inglewood Unified in receivership and the district's spending is expected to exceed revenue by $21 million this school year, according to the most recent report from the state’s Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team (FCMAT). Inglewood Unified, like other California districts, also expects enrollment to continue to decline. The FCMAT report found the district enrolls 67% fewer students than it did in the 2003-04 school year.
Read on… to learn more about the upcoming school year in Inglewood.
Los Angeles County education leaders say Inglewood Unified is emerging from a financial crisis that started more than a decade ago.
An estimated 5,000 students returned to district campuses this week for the start of what could be the last school year under the control of an outside administrator.
“ We spent the first day of school filled with joy,” said James Morris, the district’s county-appointed administrator since 2023. “Breakfasts were ready. Children were welcomed with balloons and red carpets.”
Last month, a state agency announced the district had met all the standards needed to regain local control, and if it maintains those improvements for another year, the board of education could again have the power to approve a budget and make other key decisions in 2027.
“This exit from receivership is something the community has been waiting for,” Morris said.
Morris told LAist he is “completely confident” the district’s scores on the state evaluation will continue to improve.
As a condition of the loan, the state, and later Los Angeles County, appointed a series of outside administrators to run the district.
To regain local control, Inglewood Unified must meet more than 100 standards related to finance, governance, staffing, student achievement and facilities established by the state’s Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team (FCMAT).
FCMAT’s July 2026 report found Inglewood Unified met all the standards. It now needs to maintain those standards for another year.
The district will continue to have additional oversight until it pays off the $29 million loan — with interest — and completes an external audit.
Challenges, opportunities ahead
Overspending was one factor that landed Inglewood Unified in receivership and the district's spending is expected to exceed revenue by $21 million this school year, according to the most recent FCMAT report.
The district has outlined a series of budget cuts, including nearly $7 million in the 2026-27 school year, that includes eliminating certificated educators, support staff and administrators because of declining enrollment.
Inglewood Unified, like other California districts, also expects enrollment to continue to decline. The state distributes funding based on an average of how many students show up to class each day, so fewer students means a smaller multiplier for education dollars.
However, Deputy Superintendent Bernadette Lucas, says new programs could help stem enrollment losses.
“ Historically, the district has seen its greatest drop between middle school and high school, as parents and students look for options that align to their passions and their futures,” Lucas said.
In response, Lucas said high schools are creating pathways for students to earn career and technical education certificates. In 2025, Dr. Dre and producer Jimmy Iovine partnered with the district to open a new high school focused on design, technology and entrepreneurship.
“I'm not saying it's a huge wave, but students are coming back slowly, and families are expressing more interest,” Lucas said.
How Inglewood families can get involved in the district’s future
Watch or attend a board meeting
Five elected trustees represent Inglewood Unified residents. Even though the board doesn’t currently oversee the district directly, their meetings are where important decisions about finances, curriculum, school safety and other topics are discussed.
Community members can also share their experiences and ask questions during the public comment portion of each meeting. The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, Aug. 19. The public portion of the meeting is expected to start at 5 p.m.
The agenda, livestream link and schedule of upcoming meetings are online.
Join a parent teacher group (PTA) at your child’s school
PTAs often organize fundraisers, student events and volunteer opportunities for their school. Parents, guardians, caregivers and other family members of students are welcome to join.
“ We're the fun arm of the school,” Marcie Brown, vice president of the Inglewood Council of PTAs, told LAist in July.
There are elections for three of the district’s five board seats. The winners of these races will likely serve on the first board with decision-making power since the district entered receivership.
In Trustee Area 1, incumbent Joyce Randall is running against challenger Cheryl Williams.
In Trustee Area 2, Joe W. Bowers Jr. will face off against Shelby Richardson. Incumbent and Board President Carliss McGhee cannot run again after serving three consecutive terms.
In Trustee Area 3, incumbent Brandon Myers is running against challenger Yaritza A. Gonzalez.
Voters will also decide whether to approve a new property tax to raise up to $396 million to pay for repairs and classroom upgrades.
LAist will have a guide to Inglewood Unified’s bond measure in our upcoming Voter Game Plan.
Julia Barajas
is following the impact of President Trump's immigration policies on Southern California communities.
Published August 19, 2026 2:00 PM
Advocates fear proposed changes to naturalization fees could have an outsized impact on Asian Americans communities, who make up the largest share of naturalized U.S. citizens.
(
Joseph Prezioso
/
Getty Images
)
Topline:
As the Trump administration continues to add barriers to the U.S. naturalization process, the Department of Homeland Security has proposed a new rule that would make it more expensive to apply. Advocates in Southern California are responding to changes.
Why it matters: Immigrant advocates say they are already seeing a sharp drop in the number of people who are being scheduled for naturalization interviews.
What's next: The public has until 11:59 p.m. ET on Monday, Aug. 24, 2026 to provide comments on DHS’s proposed changes.
Where to weigh in: If you would like to provide public comment, you can do so directly on the U.S. Government’s website by clicking on the green “SUBMIT A PUBLIC COMMENT” button here.
Since fall 2025, the Trump administration has moved to make it more challenging for people to become U.S. citizens.
In the past, candidates for naturalization studied the answers to 100 questions issued by the federal government. During their civics test, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services officers would ask 10 questions from the list; to pass, candidates had to answer six correctly. Now, candidates must be prepared to answer 128 questions, and more correct answers are required to pass.
The Department of Homeland Security has also reintroduced “neighborhood investigations” into aspiring citizens — a discretionary practice that had been shelved since the 1990s.
About a year since those changes were implemented, advocates in Southern California say they are seeing additional barriers, including delays in the scheduling of naturalization interviews and heightened scrutiny of applicants who request waivers for testing requirements due to a physical, developmental, or mental disability.
DHS has also proposed changes that could make it significantly more expensive to apply for naturalization; more expensive for candidates to appeal denials; and eliminate fee waivers and reduced fees for low-income applicants.
The agency has said that these changes are needed to cover the cost of adjudicating naturalization applications.
For Dahni Tsuboi, CEO of the nonprofit Asian Americans Advancing Justice Southern California, this claim rings hollow.
“When you compare the $240 billion that have been invested by Congress in the last 18 months on the enforcement side, and then, for the people who are taking all the steps to become citizens, we're just making that much harder, I think that's very alarming,” she said.
A sharp drop in naturalization interviews
In recent months, local immigrant advocacy groups have seen a drop in the number of people getting scheduled for naturalization interviews.
At the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles, “we still have folks who applied before the [changes to the civics tests were implemented last October] that are still awaiting an interview,” said staff attorney Shawntel Williams.
Asian Americans Advancing Justice Southern California has been doing naturalization work for 40 years, Tsuboi said. Typically, 5 to 10 of their clients get scheduled for naturalization interviews every month. Since April 2026, that number has dropped to zero.
According to the nonprofit, the total number of naturalization adjudications per month — including approvals and denials — went from 78,379 in September 2025 to 37,832 by January 2026.
Tsuboi fears that naturalization rates could drop even further if DHS’s fee changes are implemented.
The changes, she said, could have an outsized impact on Asian Americans communities, who make up the largest share of naturalized U.S. citizens. At the nonprofit she represents, Tsuboi added, “75% of the individuals who apply for naturalization use the fee waiver or the reduced fees.”
Want to weigh in on proposed changes to naturalization fees?
The public has until 8:59 p.m. on Monday, Aug. 24 to provide comments on DHS’s proposed changes to naturalization fees.
If you would like to provide public comment, you can do so directly on the U.S. Government’s website by clicking on the green “SUBMIT A PUBLIC COMMENT” button here.
Asian Americans Advancing Justice Southern California has also created a portal with a template, which will forward comments to the federal government.
How advocates are responding to changes
To support immigrants navigating the evolving naturalization landscape, the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles’s Shawntel Williams and her colleague, Eugenia Kim, have been hosting free citizenship education workshops at the nonprofit’s offices in Westlake.
They also offer free pre-screening clinics for people who are interested in determining their eligibility.
For people with a physical, developmental, or mental disability, Kim said “we strongly recommend — more than ever — that if you believe that you qualify to apply for an N-648." The form is a medical certification that's completed by a doctor who has personal knowledge of your disabilities and has actually treated you over the years.
"We also recommend that applicants have that completed N-648 reviewed closely by an attorney,” Kim said.
She and Williams plan to continue hosting their legal clinics for the foreseeable future.
For aspiring U.S. citizens, Williams added, legal advice has become essential, as news of all the changes to the naturalization process could be discouraging.
“We don't want people to count themselves out,” she said.