Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Federal protections to come after years of efforts

    Topline:

    U.S. wildlife officials announced a decision Tuesday to extend federal protections to monarch butterflies after years of warnings from environmentalists that populations are shrinking and the beloved pollinator may not survive climate change.


    What the protections do: The Endangered Species Act affords extensive protections to species the wildlife service lists as endangered or threatened. Under the act, it's illegal to import, export, possess, transport or kill an endangered species. A threatened listing allows for exceptions to those protections.
    The context: In the monarch's case, the proposed listing would generally prohibit anyone from killing or transporting the butterfly. People and farmers could continue to remove milkweed, a key food source for monarch caterpillars, from their gardens, backyards and fields but would be prohibited from making changes to the land that make it permanently unusable for the species. Incidental kills resulting from vehicle strikes would be allowed, people could continue to transport fewer than 250 monarchs and could continue to use them for educational purposes.
    What's next? The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service plans to add the butterfly to the threatened species list by the end of next year following an extensive public comment period.

    MADISON, Wis. — U.S. wildlife officials announced a decision Tuesday to extend federal protections to monarch butterflies after years of warnings from environmentalists that populations are shrinking and the beloved pollinator may not survive climate change.

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service plans to add the butterfly to the threatened species list by the end of next year following an extensive public comment period.

    "The iconic monarch butterfly is cherished across North America, captivating children and adults throughout its fascinating life cycle," U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Martha Williams said in a news release. "Despite its fragility, it is remarkably resilient, like many things in nature when we just give them a chance."

    The Endangered Species Act affords extensive protections to species the wildlife service lists as endangered or threatened. Under the act, it's illegal to import, export, possess, transport or kill an endangered species. A threatened listing allows for exceptions to those protections.

    In the monarch's case, the proposed listing would generally prohibit anyone from killing or transporting the butterfly. People and farmers could continue to remove milkweed, a key food source for monarch caterpillars, from their gardens, backyards and fields but would be prohibited from making changes to the land that make it permanently unusable for the species. Incidental kills resulting from vehicle strikes would be allowed, people could continue to transport fewer than 250 monarchs and could continue to use them for educational purposes.

    "We want people to continue to raise caterpillars and monarchs in their homes and use them for education," said Lori Nordstrom, assistant regional director for ecological services for the wildlife service's Midwest region.

    The proposal also would designate 4,395 acres (1,779 hectares) in seven coastal California counties where monarchs west of the Rocky Mountains migrate for winter as critical habitat for the butterfly. The designation would prohibit federal agencies from destroying or modifying that habitat. The designation doesn't prohibit all development, but landowners who need a federal license or permit for a project would have to work with the wildlife service to mitigate damage.

    Efforts to list the monarch as threatened began a decade ago

    It's been a long road to get a formal proposal from the wildlife service.

    The Center for Biological Diversity and other conservation groups petitioned the agency in 2014 to list the monarch as threatened. The agency launched a review of the the butterfly's status at the end of 2014, concluding six years later that listing was warranted but other species took priority. The center filed a federal lawsuit and won a settlement in 2022 that called for the government to decide whether to list monarchs by September 2024. The government secured an extension to December.

    "The fact that a butterfly as widespread and beloved as the monarch is now the face of the extinction crisis is a ... distress signal warning us to take better care of the environment that we all share," said Tierra Curry, a senior scientist at the center.

    Monarchs are found across North America. Known for their distinctive orange-and-black wings, they're a symbol of sunny summer days. But conservationists have worried for the past decade that monarch numbers are dwindling.

    Monarchs in the eastern United States spend winters in Mexico. Monarchs west of the Rocky Mountains typically migrate to the California coast, where their colorful clusters in tree groves attract nature lovers and tourists.

    Monarch numbers have dropped dramatically

    World Wildlife Fund Mexico, a branch of the independent global wildlife preservation organization, tracks monarch migration in that country. The group released data in February that shows the species occupied only 2.2 acres (.9 hectares) of their traditional overwintering groves in 2023-24. That's a 59% decrease in area from the previous year when the organization observed monarchs across 5.5 acres (2.2 hectares).

    The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation collects data from overwintering sites along the California coast, northern Baja California and some inland sites in California and Arizona. The number of monarchs that volunteers have counted during November — the peak of the migration season when most butterflies are present — has fallen a staggering 81% over the past quarter-century, from 1,235,490 monarchs across 101 sites to just 233,394 over 257 sites last year.

    Environmentalists say monarch populations are shrinking because of warmer temperatures from brought on by climate change, agricultural expansion and herbicides that have hindered growth of milkweed — the main food source for monarch caterpillars.

    The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), which works globally to conserve migratory animals through through treaties and regional agreements, has warned that as the planet warms, milkweed could shift toward the poles to find more conducive growing conditions. That could force monarchs to migrate longer distances, reducing time spent breeding.

    Temperature changes brought on by climate change could wreak havoc on monarch migration, too. Warmer temperatures could delay or prevent monarchs' return north, according to the convention.

    Monarchs also need to overwinter in forests where temperatures are cold enough to slow their metabolism but not so cold that they freeze. So the CMS has warned temperature shifts could spell doom for the insects.

    Why the monarchs weren't designated as endangered

    Kristen Lundh, a biologist with the wildlife service, said that the agency chose to propose listing monarchs as threatened rather than endangered because they're not in immediate danger of becoming extinct across all or a significant portion of their range. Monarchs west of the Rockies have a 95% chance of becoming extinct by 2080, she said, but most of the U.S. monarch population — 90% — can be found east of the Rockies and that population faces a 57% to 74% probability of extinction by then, she said.

    Tuesday's announcement kicks off a 90-day public comment period. Then the wildlife agency will decide whether to tweak the proposal, publish the listing or drop the effort. The agency has until December of 2025 to publish the listing if it moves forward.

    The proposal raises questions for groups that have been advocating for voluntary conservation in hopes of staving off a federal listing — and potential restrictions that could come with it.

    Matt Mulica is the lead facilitator for Farmers for Monarchs, a group of farmers, ranchers and agricultural businesses that include the American Farm Bureau Federation and the American Soybean Association.

    Mulica said farmers have been working for years on their own to maintain monarch habitat. It's too early to know what a threatened listing would mean for agriculture, he said.
    Copyright 2024 NPR

  • Public documents reveal ongoing dispute
    A large concrete bridge arching over a paved street on a clear, sunny day. A palm tree is in the forefront on the right, and a large pillar is on the left.
    The LAX Automated People Mover project was originally slated to open in 2023.
    An ongoing dispute over maintenance of parts of the system that powers the LAX Automated People Mover could be the reason the long-awaited train won’t open until next summer, or even later, according to public documents reviewed by LAist.

    More on the dispute: Power was partially shut off to the train between February and July 2025 so the contractor could repair faulty equipment in a metering cabinet used to measure how electricity is distributed throughout the system. The power shut-off reportedly delayed critical testing.

    Public documents provide more insight: In October, LAist reported about how the train’s estimated completion date moved from early 2026 to next summer. The dispute detailed in public documents about the project offer a more specific reason for the delay, which was previously opaque.

    Status of the Automated People Mover: In a statement, Los Angeles World Airports said it’s not "unusual" to see “contractual disputes” on large capital projects like the Automated People Mover and that the train is still on schedule to open to the public next summer. Construction on the project is nearly complete, and most of the current work is focused on testing and ensuring all the parts of the system work together.

    Read on … to learn more about what LAist uncovered about the latest issue embroiling the city agency responsible for LAX and its contractor.

    An ongoing dispute over maintenance of parts of the system that powers the LAX Automated People Mover could be the reason the long-awaited train won’t open until next summer, or even later, according to public documents reviewed by LAist.

    The current dispute adds to a long series of disagreements between the city and LINXS, the group of companies contracted to design, build and operate the train, that have led to the ongoing saga of delays, hundreds of millions in cost overruns and diminishing public confidence that there’ll ever be a rail-only connection to LAX.

    An L.A. County Civil Grand Jury report released earlier this year claimed that LINXS has used the dispute resolution process and “political pressures” to force contract extensions and additional compensation throughout the design and construction process.

    In October, LAist reported about how the train’s estimated completion date moved from early 2026 to next summer. The dispute detailed in the public documents offers a more specific reason for the delay, which was previously opaque.

    Dispute over metering cabinet equipment

    In February, staff from city agencies directed LINXS to repair faulty equipment in a metering cabinet, according to a summary of the dispute and findings by a third-party evaluator. While the type of equipment isn’t specified, it’s likely related to measuring the power distributed throughout the system.

    Power was partially shut down during the period of repair work, which lasted until July 2025.

    That power shut-off delayed critical testing of the technology that allows for central control of the train’s systems, according to the third-party evaluator.

    The third-party evaluator’s report said LINXS argued it was not required by contract to perform the repair work and is entitled to a schedule extension and compensation. The third-party evaluator, whose recommendations are not legally binding, agreed with LINXS’ position.

    Los Angeles World Airports, the agency that manages LAX and the Van Nuys Airport, did not participate in an August hearing regarding the dispute, the third-party evaluator’s findings said.

    The agency “rejected” the third-party evaluator’s conclusions, according to a November report from a management consulting firm retained by project lenders to monitor project progress.

    What happens next?

    According to the project contract, if a dispute remains unresolved after inquiring with the third-party evaluator, the next step is for LINXS to file a claim under a section of state law that governs complaints against public entities.

    A section on the California Tort Claims Act on the Sacramento County Public Law Library website notes that the claim is a required precursor to any civil action.

    “Filing a claim gives the agency the opportunity to settle the claim before a lawsuit is filed and to investigate the claim so that it can properly defend itself, or to correct the conditions or practices that led to the claim,” the website states.

    The management consulting firm’s November report notes that LINXS “formally submitted” a claim on Oct. 21, triggering a 60-day period for the city to “respond to the claim and sets out the basis for the LINXS entitlements to relief.”

    “Submission of [the] claim was explicitly requested by [Los Angeles World Airports] as a precursor to negotiation,” the report continues.

    The status of the Automated People Mover

    In a statement, Los Angeles World Airports said it’s not "unusual" to see "contractual disputes" on large capital projects like the Automated People Mover and that the train is still on schedule to open to the public next summer.

    “LINXS continues to assure us the train will be ready for the FIFA World Cup, but we have back up plans in place to ensure an outstanding experience for all fans who visit Los Angeles,” the statement added. “[Los Angeles World Airports] does not comment on pending legal matters.”

    Where did LAist find these documents?

    LAist found the documents on a website that tracks municipal securities called Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA). To find the page relevant to the Automated People Mover, head to emma.msrb.org. Then, in the search box on the upper righthand corner, search for 13048VBA5. This CUSIP number as it is known uniquely identifies the $1.2 billion in bonds that the California Municipal Finance Authority provided for the Automated People Mover. Halfway down the page, select the “Disclosure Documents” tab, and you’ll see a list of documents, including the third-party evaluator’s findings, as well as the monthly reports from LINXS and the management consulting firm.

    Construction on the project is nearly complete, and most of the current work is focused on testing and ensuring all the parts of the system work together.

    In November, Fluor, one of the companies that makes up LINXS, reported to investors that they can expect the Automated People Mover to “reach substantial completion over [the] next 3 quarters.”

    The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, which was also named in the documents about the dispute, declined to comment.

    LAist also reached out to LINXS and the companies that make up the group, but did not receive any response.

    The management consulting firm also did not respond to emails requesting an interview.

    Do you know something about the Automated People Mover that LAist should look into?

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.

  • Sponsored message
  • The redrawn district covers parts of LA and OC
    People wait in line outside to vote,
    With the passage of Prop. 50, Los Alamitos joins the newly redrawn District 41, which will also include Downey and La Habra.

    Topline:

    After the passage of Prop 50, the race for the newly redrawn U.S. Congressional District 41 will be vastly different. Once encompassing parts of the Inland Empire and the Coachella Valley, the district now will include southern L.A. County cities and a slice of Orange County.

    What did the passage of Prop 50 do? The proposition approved new congressional maps drawn by Democratic state officials to elect congressional representatives from 2026 through 2030.

    How exactly did District 41 change? In the previous map, District 41 stretched from Norco to Palm Desert. The newly redrawn district includes Whittier, Downey, La Habra and Los Alamitos. The new district is more than half Latino, whereas before Prop. 50, only 30% of voters were Latino, according to state Census data.

    Who is running to represent the updated district? Rep. Linda Sánchez already has thrown her hat in the ring to represent District 41. No one else has announced their candidacy yet. The deadline for the June primary is March 6.

    Read on … for how the old district compares to the new one.

    Once spanning parts of the Inland Empire and the outskirts of the Coachella Valley, the newly redrawn U.S. Congressional District 41 will be uniquely different.

    When voters approved Proposition 50 in November, it allowed California to use new congressional maps drawn by Democratic state officials to elect members of Congress from 2026 through 2030. Before this, maps were drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission.

    The maps — which state Republicans are trying to block — are expected to benefit Democrats.

    Shortly after Election Day, California Republicans announced they were challenging Prop. 50 in federal court, arguing the new district maps favor Latinos at the expense of other groups in violation of the Constitution. The federal Department of Justice filed last week to join the lawsuit. A similar legal battle playing out in Texas — where congressional maps were redrawn to favor Republicans — saw the new maps blocked Tuesday by a federal court.

    At the moment, Prop. 50 is going forward in California, and the new maps put the previously safely Republican 41st Congressional District in Riverside County in a now primarily blue district in L.A. County and even a small portion of Orange County.

    “There's a lot of changes and some musical chairs that are happening,” Jodi Balma, political science professor at Fullerton College, told LAist. “Your house hasn't moved, but your congressional district boundary has moved around you, and so you might be interested to know who is likely to represent you at the end of the 2026 elections.”

    Here’s how the chairs have shifted and why it matters in this corner of Southern California.

    Why is the race for District 41 unique? 

    Balma said District 41 is unlike many other California districts in the wake of Prop. 50.

    “The others, you could kind of understand how the borders changed and some segment of the district remained the same,” Balma said. “But this one just wholesale was picked up from the Inland Empire and moved to Los Angeles, and it's a completely new district.”

    The new district brings together residents who might have different lived experiences and cultural backgrounds, said Sara Sadhwani, assistant professor of politics at Pomona College.

    “This district is substantively and geographically quite different from that, so you certainly can't compare 41 from before to 41 today,” Sadhwani said. “We have seen an incredible amount of growth throughout the Inland Empire, and notably, many Latino and Black communities moving into the Inland Empire, and with them brings a different kind of politics.”

    While those communities might lean Democratic, she added, they have varied interests.

    “For whoever wants to run in District 41, or any of the districts representing the Inland Empire, I think that those are some of the dynamics that they will need to be attuned to in order to earn those voters' votes,” Sadhwani said.

    What are the big changes?

    In the original map, District 41 stretched from Norco to Palm Desert. It included Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Palm Desert and La Quinta. Census data show that the congressional district originally was made up of 56% white, 30% Latino, 7% Asian and 6% Black voters. Before the passing of Prop. 50, District 41 was represented by Republican Congressman Ken Calvert for more than 30 years. Calvert now is running for the newly drawn 40th District.

    The original District 41 has been sliced into several congressional districts. Norco and part of Corona now are included in the new District 35; Menifee and Lake Elsinore are in District 40; and Palm Springs and La Quinta are split into separate districts.

    Whereas Prop. 50 made some slight regional changes to certain districts in Southern California, the newly redrawn District 41 encompasses completely different counties — including parts of L.A. and Orange counties.

    District 41 now includes Whittier, Downey, La Habra and Los Alamitos. More than half the voters in the newly redrawn area are Latino, 28% are white, 11% are Asian and 5% are Black, according to state Census data.

    Who could represent the new District 41? 

    Rep. Linda Sánchez, currently representing the 38th District, announced her run for the newly redrawn 41st. Sánchez could have chosen to run in either the new District 38 — which includes Bell, Diamond Bar, Rowland Heights and part of Yorba Linda — but chose the new District 41 instead.

    “After Proposition 50 passed and split my current district, deciding where to run was an emotional but ultimately an easy choice — I chose home,” Sánchez said in a statement. “Boundaries may change, but my commitment to fighting for the people I love will never waver.”

    There are 80 House seats up for grabs in the California primary election, as well as 20 Senate seats. More than half of those are in Southern California.

    No one else has announced their candidacy for District 41 yet, but that could change. The deadline to decide to run in the June primary is March 6. Here’s an election schedule.

  • First artifacts installed in LA museum's expansion
    A huge open room with dark floors and walls. A large metal space shuttle engine is displayed towards the right of the image. An even larger stark-white circular solid rocket booster segment is laid on its side to the left.
    The first of many artifacts have been installed in the Kent Kresa Space Gallery, including a space shuttle main engine (right) and a solid rocket booster segment.

    Topline:

    The California Science Center unveiled Tuesday the first of many launch vehicles, engines and other artifacts set to be installed in the museum’s 200,000-square-foot expansion coming to Exposition Park.

    Why it matters: Jeff Rudolph, president and CEO of the California Science Center, said the $450 million expansion is California’s biggest “endeavor” yet that will inspire the next generation of scientists, engineers and explorers.

    Why now: The first artifacts in the expanded museum were placed in the Kenta Kresa Space Gallery, including a three-story-tall Electron launch vehicle from Rocket Lab in Long Beach.

    The backstory: It’ll be the only place in the world where visitors can see an authentic space shuttle in its “Go for Stack” position, which is what museum officials called the process of moving each of the space shuttle components into place.

    What's next: Officials expect to announce next year an opening date for the expansion.

    Read on ... for a peak inside the expansion coming to Exposition Park.

    The California Science Center unveiled Tuesday the first of many launch vehicles, engines and other artifacts set to be installed in the museum’s 200,000-square-foot expansion coming to Exposition Park.

    Once complete, the new Samuel Oschin Air and Space Center will include multi-level galleries built around a towering centerpiece — the space shuttle Endeavour — displayed in its 20-story vertical launch position.

    It’ll be the only place in the world where visitors can see an authentic space shuttle in its “Go for Stack” position, which is what museum officials called the process of moving each of the space shuttle components into place.

    Museum admission will be free.

    Jeff Rudolph, president and CEO of the California Science Center, said the $450 million expansion is California’s biggest “endeavor” yet to inspire the next generation of scientists, engineers and explorers.

    “The enthusiasm that people have when they come in and see this stuff and get excited about it will hopefully lead to many more people, young and old, but particularly young people wanting to pursue more education in science,” Rudolph told LAist.

    Museum officials expect to announce next year an opening date, according to Rudolph.

    A look inside the center

    The Samuel Oschin Air and Space Center will feature three main galleries: the Samuel Oschin Shuttle Gallery, the Korean Air Aviation Gallery and the Kent Kresa Space Gallery.

    Guests will be guided through hundreds of exhibits and authentic artifacts focused on the exploration of the universe — including rocket ships that carried humans into space and telescopes used to view stars and galaxies beyond our reach.

    A towering black rocket, with a silver logo and the word "rocket" written on the front, is displayed standing straight up towards the unfinished roof of an interior building.
    A real Electron launch vehicle from Rocket Lab in Long Beach spans several stories tall in the Kent Kresa Space Gallery.
    (
    Makenna Sievertson
    /
    LAist
    )

    The first artifacts in the expanded museum were placed in the Kenta Kresa Space Gallery, including a three-story-tall Electron launch vehicle from Rocket Lab in Long Beach.

    Adam Spice, chief financial officer of Rocket Lab, told LAist the Electron helped lower the cost of getting to space by sending satellites in smaller, cheaper rockets. The new center is an opportunity to get up close and personal with an Electron for the first time outside of a factory.

    Spice said he hopes it’ll show visitors their dreams can become a reality.

    “They can be part of something much bigger than probably they ever thought they could,” he said.

    A segment of a solid rocket booster that flew into space several times is laid on its side on the second floor of the gallery.

    Kenneth Phillips, the California Science Center’s aerospace curator, told LAist it’ll be turned into an interactive exhibit with audio, video and educational graphics.

    “It's 12 feet in diameter, so people can actually walk through it and learn about the function of it from the inside out literally,” Phillips said.

    A close-up of intricate silver metal pieces, wiring and welding. It's part of the main engine of a space shuttle.
    Visitors will be able to get up close and personal with a space shuttle main engine.
    (
    Makenna Sievertson
    /
    LAist
    )

    A detailed model of a space shuttle main engine is set up next to the solid rocket booster. Three of those main engines helped boost space shuttles into orbit by providing about 20% of their power, Phillips said.

    What's next

    Construction of the Samuel Oschin Air and Space Center started more than three years ago and is on track to be completed in the coming weeks, according to museum officials.

    The remaining exhibits and artifacts will then be installed over "many months," Rudolph said. Officials expect to announce next year an opening date for the expansion.

    The California Science Center also is looking to raise about $70 million more for the $450 million project before it opens. You can learn more about its “EndeavourLA” fundraising campaign here.

    Catch up on our coverage ...

  • American Cinematheque to program Village Theater
    The Fox Westwood Village Theater is viewed on June 16, 2022 in Los Angeles, California. Jurassic World Dominion can be seen advertised on the Marquee.
    The Westwood Village Theater will be operated and programmed by American Cinematheque when it opens

    Topline:

    The group of directors restoring the Village Theater in Westwood are tapping film nonprofit American Cinematheque to program and run the venue when it opens.

    Why it matters: American Cinematheque also programs the Aero Theatre in Santa Monica, the Egyptian Theatre in Hollywood and the Los Feliz Theater, making it a visible and active film arts nonprofit in the industry.

    The backstory: The nearly century-old movie palace went up for sale in 2024 before Village Directors Circle bought it in February. The group is comprised of more than 30 notable filmmakers. They're led by director Jason Reitman (Thank You For Smoking, Juno) and their ranks include Guillermo del Toro, Alfonso Cuarón, Lulu Wang, Chloé Zhao, Christopher Nolan and Ryan Coogler.

    What's next: VDC says it's eyeing a 2027 opening for the Village Theater, and is currently in the quiet phase of a capital campaign to raise $25 million to restore and remodel the Village Theater into a more than 1,000-seat venue.