Tesla vehicles charge at a Supercharger lot in Kettleman City on June 23, 2024.
(
Larry Valenzuela
/
CalMatters/CatchLight Local
)
Topline:
Californians could get instant rebates on electric vehicle purchases under Gov. Gavin Newsom's $200 million plan, which would require automakers to match state incentives dollar-for-dollar.
The plan: The Legislature must still approve Newsom's plan which the California Air Resources Board would oversee. It would offer rebates at the point of sale to lower upfront costs for buyers instead of reimbursing them later. The draft does not specify rebate amounts, which the air board will determine during program design and discuss at a public workshop this spring, said Lindsay Buckley, a spokesperson for the agency. The proposal limits eligibility by vehicle price, not buyer income. New passenger cars qualify only if priced at or below $55,000, while vans, SUVs and pickup trucks are capped at $80,000. Used vehicles are limited to a sales price of $25,000. All vehicles must be registered to California residents.
Why now: Newsom first unveiled the incentive proposal as part of his January budget plan but released few initial details. State officials cast the subsidy as a response to President Donald Trump’s dismantling of incentives and blocking of California’s clean-vehicle mandate.
Californians could get instant rebates on electric vehicle purchases under Gov. Gavin Newsom's $200 million plan, which would require automakers to match state incentives dollar-for-dollar.
The plan, which the Legislature must still approve, lays out for the first time how the governor plans to steer a California-specific rebate program to bolster a slowing electric car market after the Trump administration cancelled federal incentives last year.
The California Air Resources Board would oversee the program, offering rebates at the point of sale to lower upfront costs for buyers instead of reimbursing them later. The draft does not specify rebate amounts, which the air board will determine during program design and discuss at a public workshop this spring, said Lindsay Buckley, a spokesperson for the agency.
The proposal exempts the program from the state’s usual rule-making requirements, allowing California to design and launch the rebates more quickly than typical for new programs.
Newsom first unveiled the incentive proposal as part of his January budget plan but released few initial details. State officials cast the subsidy as a response to President Donald Trump’s dismantling of incentives and blocking of California’s clean-vehicle mandate.
How the rebates would work
Outside experts and clean vehicle advocates said the details raise new questions about how the program would work in practice and who would benefit.
Ethan Elkind, a climate law expert at UC Berkeley, said structuring the incentives as grants allows the state to set the terms automakers must meet to access the money, giving California leverage over manufacturers.
But Mars Wu, a senior program manager with the Greenlining Institute, which advocates for investments in communities of color, said the draft plans fall short on equity, arguing the proposal does little to ensure the incentives reach the Californians who need them most.
“[The] proposal sets up a first-come, first-serve free-for-all scenario, which is not a prudent use of extremely limited public dollars in a deficit year,” she wrote in an email.
How far could the money go?
The proposal limits eligibility by vehicle price, not buyer income. New passenger cars qualify only if priced at or below $55,000, while vans, SUVs and pickup trucks are capped at $80,000. Used vehicles are limited to a sales price of $25,000. All vehicles must be registered to California residents.
The newly released details also add context about the size of the program. A CalMatters estimate of the governor’s initial proposal found that the $200 million would cover rebates for only about 20% of last year’s electric vehicle sales.
The proposed matching funds from auto manufacturers could allow the program to cover a larger share of buyers or provide larger point-of-sale rebates, depending on how the incentives are structured.
One clean car advocate said the details aren’t locked in yet — including how the rebates could be targeted. Wu said the state could move quickly without abandoning equity by deciding who qualifies in advance while still offering rebates at the dealership. “There is a way to balance equity and expediency,” Wu wrote.
Hundreds of athletes from around the world — including 232 from the U.S. — will descend on over two dozen venues across northern Italy to compete in 16 different sports. `But you don't have to board a plane or sport hand warmers to get a good view, thanks to NBC's robust broadcasting rights and NPR's scrappy team of journalists on the ground. Here's how to follow the action.
Opening ceremony: The Feb. 6 opening ceremony marks the official start of the Games (even though several sports, including curling and ice hockey, start competing two days earlier). NBC's live coverage of the opening ceremony (also streaming on Peacock) will begin at 2 p.m. ET on Friday, Feb. 6, with a prime-time broadcast planned for 8 p.m. ET the same day. NBC says it will broadcast events live throughout the day, with a nightly prime-time highlights show at 8 p.m. ET, followed by a late-night version.
Read on . . . for details about the opening ceremony and NPR's coverage.
It's the Winter Olympics, that special season every four years in which everyone you know is suddenly an expert on luge strategy and curling technique from the comfort of their couch.
There's plenty to dive into this year, at the unusually spread-out Milan Cortina Olympics.
Hundreds of athletes from around the world — including 232 from the U.S. — will descend on over two dozen venues across northern Italy to compete in 16 different sports. There are 116 medal events on the line throughout the 2 1/2 weeks. And this time, unlike the COVID-era 2022 Beijing Winter Games, spectators will be allowed to watch in person.
But you don't have to board a plane or sport hand warmers to get a good view, thanks to NBC's robust broadcasting rights and NPR's scrappy team of journalists on the ground. Here's how to follow the action — and peek behind the curtain — from home.
How to watch the opening ceremony
The Feb. 6 opening ceremony marks the official start of the Games (even though several sports, including curling and ice hockey, start competing two days earlier).
It will be held primarily at the historic San Siro Stadium in Milan, featuring performances by icons like Mariah Carey and Andrea Bocelli, as well as traditional elements like the Parade of Nations and the lighting of the Olympic cauldron.
But there will also be simultaneous ceremonies and athlete parades at some of the other venues — scattered hundreds of miles apart — and, for the first time in history, a second Olympic cauldron will be lit in the co-host city of Cortina d'Ampezzo.
NBC's live coverage of the opening ceremony (also streaming on Peacock) will begin at 2 p.m. ET on Friday, Feb. 6, with a prime-time broadcast planned for 8 p.m. ET the same day.
How to keep up once the Games begin
There are 16 days of competition between the opening and closing ceremonies, with contests and medal events scattered throughout, depending on the sport. Here's the full schedule (events are listed in local time in Italy, which is six hours ahead of Eastern time).
NBC says it will broadcast events live throughout the day, with a nightly prime-time highlights show at 8 p.m. ET, followed by a late-night version.
U.S.-based viewers can watch on NBC, Peacock and a host of other platforms, including the apps and websites of both NBC and NBC Sports. Seasoned Olympic viewers will recognize Peacock viewing experiences like "Gold Zone" (which whips around between key moments, eliminating the need to channel surf) and "Multiview," now available on mobile.
The Feb. 22 closing ceremony will be broadcast live starting at 2:30 p.m. ET, and again on prime time at 9 p.m. ET.
It will take place at a historic amphitheater in Verona, which will also host the opening ceremony of the Paralympics on March 6. Some 600 Para athletes will compete in 79 medal events across six sports — including Para Alpine skiing, sled hockey and wheelchair curling — before the closing ceremony in Cortina on March 15.
How to follow NPR's coverage
All the while, you can check out NPR's Olympics coverage to better understand the key people, context and moments that make up the Games.
NPR's five-person Olympics team will bring you news, recaps and color from the ground in Italy, online, on air and in your inbox. Plus, expect updates and the occasional deep dive from NPR's journalists watching from D.C. and around the world.
You can find all of NPR's Winter Olympics stories (past, present and upcoming) here on our website.
To listen to our broadcast coverage, tune to your local NPR station and stream our radio programming on npr.org or the NPR app.
Plus, subscribe to our newsletter, Rachel Goes to the Games, for a daily dose of what it's like to be there in person.
We'll also have a video podcast, Up First Winter Games, to further dissect the day's biggest Olympic stories and oddities. You can find it on NPR's YouTube page.
Copyright 2026 NPR
Yusra Farzan
covers Orange County and its 34 cities, watching those long meetings — boards, councils and more — so you don’t have to.
Published February 4, 2026 8:40 AM
Jim Vanderpool, former Anaheim city manager, at an Anaheim City Council meeting.
(
Gary Coronado
/
Los Angeles Times
)
Topline:
Anaheim officials announced Tuesday that City Manager Jim Vanderpool has resigned. The resignation comes after weeks of scrutiny into Vanderpool’s ties to special interests in the city.
How we got here: Vanderpool’s resignation came to light after a Daily Pilot report revealed that he did not disclose a trip with former Anaheim Chamber of Commerce officials to Lake Havasu in 2020. The trip took place just before the council voted on the sale of the Angels stadium deal and prompted the current City Council to discuss his future at the helm of O.C.'s biggest city last week. The Fair Political Practices Commission, the state’s campaign finance watchdog agency, is also currently investigating Vanderpool under the Political Reform Act.
The context: The stadium sale fell apart after a federal investigation revealed then-Mayor Harry Sidhu was sharing “city-specific information” with the Angels’ owners to use against the city in negotiations. The investigation also revealed an overly friendly relationship between Sidhu and Todd Ament, the former CEO of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. According to prosecutors, Ament was the ringleader of a “cabal” of leaders, including politicians and business leaders, who exerted influence over the city.
What's next: Greg Garcia, who served as Vanderpool's deputy, will serve as the acting city manager.
Keep up with LAist.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
Jacob Margolis
covers science, with a focus on environmental stories and disasters, as well as investigations and accountability.
Published February 4, 2026 8:00 AM
The California Department of Water Resources Snow Survey and Water Supply Forecasting Unit conducts the second snow survey of the 2026 season at Phillips Station in the Sierra Nevada.
(
Sara Nevis
/
California Department of Water Resources
)
Topline:
While California started the rainy season off strong, as of early February, the Sierra snowpack is at just 56% of where it should normally be by this time of the year. That's a concerning sign, given the rainy season is about two-thirds over.
Our other major water source: The Upper Colorado River Basin is catastrophically behind the ball, with one expert describing the conditions as, "the worst I've seen."
Why it matters: Snowpack is a crucial store of water in the West. As it melts, it provides landscapes and people with water throughout the dry seasons. California gets its water both from the Sierra Nevada and the Colorado River.
Read on ... for details about the snowpack.
On a clear January day about a week ago, California water resources engineer Jacob Kollen jammed a blue Mt. Rose sampler deep into the snow at Phillips Station, near Lake Tahoe in the Sierra Nevada.
The second California Department of Water Resources survey of the season showed the snow was 23 inches deep, with a snow water equivalent (the amount of water contained) of eight inches. That’s just 46% of average, an alarming fall from the 89% of average seen at the beginning of the month.
These are crucial measurements to watch, as the snowpack is California’s most important reservoir. As snow melts throughout the year, it provides residents, agriculture and the state’s vast landscapes with much-needed moisture.
Our wet season began with quite a strong showing of rain, but a dry January coupled with warm weather has set California off in the wrong direction.
“ Statewide, we were better off last year than we are at this point,” said David Ricardo, the Department of Water Resources hydrology section manager, during a news conference about the snow survey results. “Something to be cognizant of, especially if we can make up more ground in the northern and central part of the Sierra Nevada.”
California's snowpack is at 56 percent of normal as of February 3, 2026.
(
California Department of Water Resources
)
As of Tuesday, the statewide snowpack is at just 56% of normal for this date, with the southern Sierra doing the heavy lifting at 74%. The central and northern portions are at 56% and 43% respectively.
For now, California reservoirs are well stocked, and drought conditions have been rained away, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor. However, our snow water totals are just about in line with what we saw in 2012, the beginning of a catastrophic drought period.
Over in the Colorado River Basin, which supplies Southern California with about 20% of its water, snowpack is at about 64% of normal.
“ There's no way to sugarcoat it,” said Kathryn Sorensen, director of research at the Kyl Center for Water Policy at Arizona State University. “ I've been doing Colorado River stuff for 25 years. This is the worst I've seen.”
In the upper basin, the snow water equivalent is lower than it was in 2002 — a period of time so alarmingly dry that seven states and Mexico came together to hash out how to manage Colorado River water. The agreement, which has been in place since 2007, is set to expire at the end of 2026.
Because California enjoys senior water rights, it’s unlikely that the state will see Colorado River cuts for the next couple of years, Sorensen said. Arizona, however, will.
The Climate Prediction Center is forecasting below average precipitation across much of California through the end of the state's rainy season.
(
Climate Prediction Center
/
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
)
Where will things go from here?
Experts are eyeing April 1, which is usually when the snowpack reaches its apex. If we manage to get a few sizable snowstorms by then, we should be sitting pretty heading into the dry months.
NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center is forecasting likely above average precipitation over the next few weeks for California. Over the next several months though, forecasts are for below-normal precipitation with elevated temperatures.
Longer term, higher temperatures as a result of climate change can cause more precipitation to fall as rain rather than as snow, and for snow on the ground to melt faster. Warming air temperatures dry out soils and vegetation more quickly, too, meaning even an average amount of precipitation may not be enough for some ecosystems. Overall, snowpack could decline by more than 50% by the end of the century, according to California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment.
Illegal dumping in Koreatown is a major issue for residents. Several intersections are some of the hardest hit neighborhoods across Los Angeles, like this scene on Berendo Street.
(
Jon Regardie
/
The LA Local
)
Topline:
An old couch, the remains of a black massage chair and a refrigerator with its door open. The items are unremarkable, but they speak to the volume of trash that falls into Koreatown — one of the hardest-hit neighborhoods for illegal dumping, according to the latest available data from the city.
About the data: From April 1 to Dec. 31, 2025, the city received a total of 206 illegal dumping reports at 4th Street and New Hampshire in Koreatown, according to an analysis of public data by Crosstown. The next highest count in that time frame was the 117 calls on the 7300 block of Lennox Avenue in Van Nuys, which leads overall for calls for service across the city.
Why it matters: Illegal dumping is a long-festering problem in Los Angeles. While in some instances it involves an individual tossing a few trash bags on a corner, it often means discarded furniture, mounds of unsold fruit or construction detritus dumped in a vacant lot or an alley at night by someone who does not want to pay a disposal fee.
Read on... for what illegal dumping means to K-town residents.
This story was originally published by The LA Local on Feb. 3, 2026.
An old couch, the remains of a black massage chair and a refrigerator with its door open clutter 4th Street and New Hampshire Avenue on the grassy strip between the sidewalk and the street.
On Berendo Street, two refrigerators, both full-sized, lay splayed out on the lawn on a sunny day in late January. Both were tagged with graffiti.
The items are unremarkable, but they speak to the volume of trash that falls into Koreatown — one of the hardest-hit neighborhoods for illegal dumping, according to the latest available data from the city.
“Every single person in my building — that’s their top concern,” said Tania Ramos, who was born and raised in Koreatown and serves on the Wilshire Center-Koreatown Neighborhood Council. “It’s so horrible.”
From April 1 to Dec. 31, 2025, the city received a total of 206 illegal dumping reports at 4th Street and New Hampshire in Koreatown, according to an analysis of public data by Crosstown. The next highest count in that time frame was the 117 calls on the 7300 block of Lennox Avenue in Van Nuys, which leads overall for calls for service across the city.
Los Angeles overhauled its data last March, making it difficult to compare data from previous years.
Streets in L.A. with most illegal dumping reports in 2025
Address
Reports
Neighborhood
4th St. & New Hampshire Ave.
206
Koreatown
7300 Block of Lennox Ave.
117
Van Nuys
5767 Lankershim Blvd.
100
North Hollywood
722 E. Washington Blvd.
80
Historic South-Central
8655 Belford Ave.
73
Westchester
Period from April 1 - Dec. 31, 2025 Source: The LA Local | City of Los Angeles MyLA311 cases dataset
Residents say the reporting system itself can feel ineffective.
“All the city tells us is to contact 311,” Ramos said. “They redirect you, but you have to wait and wait, and we end up being the ones that have to do neighborhood cleanups.”
The most impacted neighborhood from the 9-month period of April–December 2025 was Van Nuys, with 15,671 calls for service. Koreatown received 12,640 calls. Westlake ranked sixth, and Boyle Heights stood eighth, according to the data.
A spokesperson for Councilmember Heather Hutt, who represents part of Koreatown, did not respond to requests for comment about the long wait times and the high volume of illegal dumping.
Koreatown residents say they often report illegal dumping in their neighborhood, but often face long wait times for any type of cleanup.
(
Jon Regardie
/
The LA Local
)
Illegal dumping is a long-festering problem in Los Angeles. While in some instances it involves an individual tossing a few trash bags on a corner, it often means discarded furniture, mounds of unsold fruit or construction detritus dumped in a vacant lot or an alley at night by someone who does not want to pay a disposal fee.
Ramos said delays can stretch into weeks.
“Recently, there was a toilet in front of my building, and it took four to five weeks for it to get cleaned up,” she said.
Pablo Cardoso, director of environmental services at the Koreatown Youth and Community Center, said illegal dumping has “always been an issue.”
“For our crews, yes, there have been more requests to go and pick up bulky items,” he said.
Cardoso believes convenience and limited infrastructure both play a role.
“My personal opinion about it is that people are just lazy and the easy way to get rid of their unwanted furniture is to just dump it in front of their building,” he said. “I also don’t think that these condos or apartments where they live don’t have the dumping or trash bins for big furniture.”
Neighborhoods with most illegal dumping reports in 2025
Neighborhood
Reports
1
Van Nuys
15,671
2
Koreatown
12,640
3
North Hollywood
11,620
4
East Hollywood
10,764
5
Hollywood
10,611
6
Westlake
9,431
7
Sun Valley
9,278
8
Boyle Heights
7,719
9
Valley Glen
7,076
10
Florence
7,069
Period from April 1 - Dec. 31, 2025 Source: The LA Local | City of Los Angeles MyLA311 cases dataset
Sometimes there are hazardous materials. At a Jan. 14 meeting of the City Council’s Public Works Committee, Nicholas Fuentes, with the city sanitation bureau’s Livability Services Division, said asbestos in abandoned commercial and construction material is a problem.
Los Angeles City Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez chairs the committee and said during the meeting that some residents don’t use or know about the free hazardous waste drop-offs the city offers and instead resort to dumping.
“I come across buckets full of oil in my district, like on the side of the road,” Hernandez said. “That means someone got the oil, put it in the buckets, put it in their mode of transportation, drove to this place and dropped it off.”
The city offers free bulky item pick-up for residents getting rid of that old desk or mattress (it involves lugging the item to the curb on trash day). But illegal dumping is a criminal offense, and perpetrators can be fined up to $1,000.
“Do they call 311? I hope they do,” Cardoso said. “Is 311 the best system? It’s there, but I don’t know. What I know is that they’re overwhelmed with requests.”
Awareness of the service remains low, organizers say.
“When I would promote 311, which is a free service, a majority of people do not know about it,” said Pia Cadanela of No Harm KTLA, a volunteer group that does trash pickups in the neighborhood twice a month. “Even people who volunteer with us would be surprised. They did not know that there’s a free pick-up service by the city.”
The issue is not new. In 2021, then-City Controller Ron Galperin authored a report titled “Piling Up: Addressing L.A.’s Illegal Dumping Problem.” Yet the document’s suggestions on how to combat the practice have produced few tangible results.
Fourth and New Hampshire may be a dumping destination because of one corner: While apartment buildings and the Joohyang Presbyterian Church occupy three parts of the intersection, the southeast corner holds a vacant lot, with a series of tents by a retaining wall.
It’s likely already being monitored by the city. Fuentes said his team works on problem points in each of the 15 council districts.
“We have identified with the directors of each council district those chronic locations, and we know that they need to be serviced on a regular basis,” he said at the committee meeting.
Although Fourth and New Hampshire suffered more than anywhere else in the city last year, it was not the only destination for frequent dumpers in Koreatown. There were 57 MyLA311 reports at 3525 W. Third St., a strip mall. That ranked ninth in the city.
Koreatown addresses with most illegal dumping reports in 2025
Address
Reports
4th St. & New Hampshire Ave.
206
3525 W. 3rd St.
57
826 S. Hobart Blvd.
52
734 S. Ardmore Ave.
47
3918 Beverly Blvd.
44
Period from April 1 - Dec. 31, 2025 Source: The LA Local | City of Los Angeles MyLA311 cases dataset
Cardoso said dumping tends to snowball after the first items are left behind.
“I drive by the streets, and there might be one or a couple of chairs,” he said. “And then later I drive by again, and it’s like, ‘Oh, now there’s a sofa. Now there’s a fridge.’”
“People see that little pile, and they’re like, ‘Oh, let’s add to that pile,’” he continued.
Ramos said residents are left frustrated by what she sees as a lack of outreach.
“I’ve never seen a city representative go door to door with resources and inform community members,” Ramos said.
She added, “It’s a combination of a lot of things — a lack of community education, lack of city outreach, lack of getting to the complaints, long response times — which can discourage people from contacting 311 because they have to wait too long.”